: So Lockstin and Noggin must have it wrong on the Breath of the wild timeline theory.... (Editted)
: This is a tool that will turn anything you draw into a cat.
: Everyone's crying about a high damage meta, everyone's crying about exhaust supressing damage
To be fair damage being this high across the board indirectly makes exhaust stronger.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
CLG ear (NA)
: Do you think its possible to have a true friendship with an artificial intelligence?
: how do you come up with usernames
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnCyMpl4dhk
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
CLG ear (NA)
: Gosu possibly caught scripting in a match
Yeah normally I'm pretty skeptical about scripting footage but I watched the caitlyn trap dodge at 0.25 speed and noticed his cursor didn't even move to make that dodge possible.
ZaDahaka11 (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=TheLittlestLulu,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=ceFEJber,comment-id=000000010000,timestamp=2017-02-16T02:01:01.280+0000) > > Dogs needed to be trained to be very useful for those things, especially so if the owner didn't want to have to have to keep an eye on them due to their low maintenance. > > I've taken care of lots of Siamese cats, which are known to rival dogs in their affection towards humans. HAHAHA good one.. really. I will accept that love is different from pet to pet, but you can't say a cat is more loyal than a dog. it doesn't make sense by their own nature, plus a cat won't risk himself to protect the owner till death. if he does, that rarely happens.. while any dog, even small can do that.
> [{quoted}](name=ZaDahaka11,realm=EUNE,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=ceFEJber,comment-id=0000000100000000,timestamp=2017-02-16T02:03:10.145+0000) > > HAHAHA good one.. really. > > I will accept that love is different from pet to pet, but you can't say a cat is more loyal than a dog. it doesn't make sense by their own nature, plus a cat won't risk himself to protect the owner till death. if he does, that rarely happens.. while any dog, even small can do that. I had a Siamese cat who died of cancer and her sister had to be put down because she became so depressed she stopped eating and her liver eventually failed due to starvation.
ZaDahaka11 (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=TheLittlestLulu,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=ceFEJber,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-02-16T00:59:15.043+0000) > > You know cats have historically been used to keep dangerous pests such as snakes and scorpions at bay. The biggest advantage of cats was that they could do this and be left to their own devices without any training. at the same time people used dogs to control the herd of sheep, or defend homes. stop using that boring story every time, we don't need cats for anything anymore, other than pets. and they are only good because they don't need much like dogs, however as you can see from the pictures.. dogs "cost" more for a reason.
> [{quoted}](name=ZaDahaka11,realm=EUNE,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=ceFEJber,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2017-02-16T01:51:16.445+0000) > > at the same time people used dogs to control the herd of sheep, or defend homes. stop using that boring story every time, we don't need cats for anything anymore, other than pets. and they are only good because they don't need much like dogs, however as you can see from the pictures.. dogs "cost" more for a reason. Dogs needed to be trained to be very useful for those things, especially so if the owner didn't want to have to have to keep an eye on them due to their high maintenance compared to cats. I've taken care of lots of Siamese cats, which are known to rival dogs in their affection towards humans.
ZaDahaka11 (EUNE)
: If I die alone at home, how many hours or days will it be until my pet dog, cat or bird eats me?
You know cats have historically been used to keep dangerous pests such as snakes and scorpions at bay. The biggest advantage of cats was that they could do this and be left to their own devices without any training.
Risen29 (NA)
: Few questions about replay viewing
1 yes. 2 no. Don't bother using the official replay feature until Riot gets their head out of their asses and lets there be a way to use old replays. As it stands you cannot even save an old version of the game files and play the replays with them.
Rioter Comments
: List of fun builds that cannot be played anymore
There is a circle of hell that was made specifically for people who want AP Yi and AP Tryndamere to return.
Rioter Comments
: omg Lulu Plz
lulu's woolly world
: The valentine posters.
Seems pretty obvious to me. Garen is buying Lux clothes as a gift and Taric is the one selling them. Note Garen holding a wallet while Taric is holding a quill like he's writing a very expensive receipt.
: omg Chicken Plz
that chicken isn't made of wool you fucked up the meme
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=TheLittlestLulu,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HREWOZn7,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2017-02-14T23:58:57.403+0000) > > TBH you should have looked at the steam reviews before buying. There is a reason most of the recent reviews are negative. I bought it so I can just play with my friends
> [{quoted}](name=Popstar Ahri,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HREWOZn7,comment-id=0001000000000000,timestamp=2017-02-15T00:01:07.988+0000) > > I bought it so I can just play with my friends Play on a private server with them then. Do not even consider playing on an official server.
: > [{quoted}](name=TheLittlestLulu,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HREWOZn7,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2017-02-14T23:55:58.518+0000) > > You're not missing out on anything. The online servers are horrifically laggy and ever since Wildcard killed all their braincells and implemented server transfer Chinese clans have been hopping from server to server wiping out everything. But I just bought the game yesterday...
> [{quoted}](name=Popstar Ahri,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HREWOZn7,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2017-02-14T23:57:18.836+0000) > > But I just bought the game yesterday... TBH you should have looked at the steam reviews before buying. There is a reason most of the recent reviews are negative.
: Does anyone here play ARK survival evolved?
You're not missing out on anything. The online servers are horrifically laggy and ever since Wildcard killed all their braincells and implemented server transfer Chinese clans have been hopping from server to server wiping out everything.
: Trump could have beaten Bernie Sanders because he is a socialist. Most of the Bernie supporters were millenials who don't remember the cold war and use the internet all the time. So if you hang out on the internet I can see why you would think Bernie would win. Well a lot of Americans don't use the internet every day and would never vote for Sanders. They think he is a communist pretty much, and that's the only reason they would need to not vote for him. In my opinion Bernie Sanders would have been a pretty good President but I would be worried about who would be President after him because socialism gives the Government more power and we know there is corruption in the Government already.
> [{quoted}](name=Hypochondria9,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=ug6YzHQN,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2017-02-14T16:51:29.828+0000) > > Most of the Bernie supporters were millenials who don't remember the cold war and use the internet all the time. I don't think you remember the Cold War either if you think anything Bernie supported could be linked to anything that happened during that period of time.
: > [{quoted}](name=batosia95136,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=Z2H9vriu,comment-id=00000001000000000000000000000000000100000000,timestamp=2017-02-14T22:35:53.593+0000) > > I mean you even read his quote and interpreted the opposite of what he said. If it was meant in sarcasm, then it means he wants it to actually be the fairness doctrine. If he was serious, then he supports it. Lose-Lose for you regardless. > Donald Trump EXPLICITLY OPPOSES net neutrality. prove it. > When he calls it the fairness doctrine he's saying that he wants to get rid of it.... Like we did to the Fairness Doctrine. He called net Neutrality a top-down power grab of the internet. prove that Trump wants to get rid of it. > You don't even know what his policies are, and you're still supporting them? The reason he picked that FCC chair was BECAUSE they shared similar views. Prove that Trump has explicitly said "I want to remove net neutrality". > I can't tell if you're too stupid to read what Donald Trump actually posted, or you just think that his opinion on it is so bad that it can't be his opinion. Implying you haven't been blowing up everything he says into "this is gonna doom all of America!" I've asked for straight up proof of what TRUMP has said, and you can't be bothered to do that. It's not on me for you to prove your point.
> [{quoted}](name=Busty Demoness,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=Z2H9vriu,comment-id=000000010000000000000000000000000001000000000000,timestamp=2017-02-14T22:39:49.143+0000) > > If it was meant in sarcasm, then it means he wants it to actually be the fairness doctrine. If he was serious, then he supports it. Lose-Lose for you regardless. > > prove it. > > prove that Trump wants to get rid of it. > > Prove that Trump has explicitly said "I want to remove net neutrality". > > Implying you haven't been blowing up everything he says into "this is gonna doom all of America!" > > I've asked for straight up proof of what TRUMP has said, and you can't be bothered to do that. It's not on me for you to prove your point. dude come on Trump's opinion on net neutrality is sitting right there in in front of you in all it's naked and terrible glory. Watching you shill it up and completely shut down your own brain's ability to process it is getting kind of depressing. Here's lets break it all down: Trump's tweet was "Obama’s attack on the internet is another top down power grab. Net neutrality is the Fairness Doctrine. Will target conservative media." Trump posted this November 2014, which was the same time Obama pushed to have rules for Net Neutrality to prevent ISPs from throttling legal content. Therefore it is clear that Trump was responding directly to this action. Trump compares it to the Fairness Doctrine as a scare tactic to appeal to Republicans who are old enough to remember it, claiming that Net Neutrality will be used to silence them. It's pretty crystal pepsi clear that Trump isn't exactly a big fan of Net Neutrality lol.
: > [{quoted}](name=TheLittlestLulu,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=Z2H9vriu,comment-id=000000010000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-02-14T22:28:21.433+0000) > > The Republicans were absolutely not in favor of the Fairness Doctrine. That's why Reagan pushed the FCC to abolish it lol. > > When Trump says Net Neutrality is the Fairness Doctrine he is not saying that in a positive sense. You have to remember that Trump is an independent who swiped the Republican nomination from under their noses. And if you're going to repeatedly ignore that simply because he got the republican nomination, then I don't know what to tell you. And if he's using it sarcastically to imply Obama was trying to censor conservative media, then what exactly makes you think Trump isn't gonna try to make it better?
> [{quoted}](name=Busty Demoness,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=Z2H9vriu,comment-id=0000000100000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-02-14T22:33:44.977+0000) > > You have to remember that Trump is an independent who swiped the Republican nomination from under their noses. And if you're going to repeatedly ignore that simply because he got the republican nomination, then I don't know what to tell you. > > And if he's using it sarcastically to imply Obama was trying to censor conservative media, then what exactly makes you think Trump isn't gonna try to make it better? The fact that he straight up said that Net Neutrality is the Fairness Doctrine. That's a pretty heavy implication that he thinks it's bad. The Republicans didn't make the Fairness Doctrine better, they removed it from existence forever. Guess who Trump is trying to appeal to when he compares Net Neutrality to the Fairness Doctrine?
: > [{quoted}](name=batosia95136,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=Z2H9vriu,comment-id=0000000100000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-02-14T22:20:48.768+0000) > > There's a saying "X is self evident" it pretty much means that it's so obvious that if you don't understand it already you're too stupid to understand it if it's explained to you. > > If I have to explain how hiring someone who believes heavily in a certain thing that you are now giving them authority over affects that thing... I'm going to headdesk. http://i.imgur.com/6BYn6ic.jpg I already did. Because you're assuming Trump would allow that simply because he picked that person for his cabinet. Allow me to link something Malza so courteously gave us: https://mobile.twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/532608358508167168?lang=en In this tweet, Trump says "Net Neutrality is the Fairness Doctrine." Sounds very much like he's in favor of it. Oh, wait, but his cabinet pick means that this is a blatant lie and he's gonna overturn it. Right? Get your head out of your ass, please. Find me a quote of Trump saying "I wanna overturn Net Neutrality". Do not reference his cabinet pick. Do not use anything his cabinet pick has said. Those are not Trump's words and to use them as a substitute for Trump's position is fallacious.
> [{quoted}](name=Busty Demoness,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=Z2H9vriu,comment-id=00000001000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-02-14T22:27:19.868+0000) > In this tweet, Trump says "Net Neutrality is the Fairness Doctrine." Sounds very much like he's in favor of it. Oh, wait, but his cabinet pick means that this is a blatant lie and he's gonna overturn it. Right? The Republicans were absolutely not in favor of the Fairness Doctrine. That's why Reagan pushed the FCC to abolish it lol. When Trump says Net Neutrality is the Fairness Doctrine he is not saying that in a positive sense.
: > [{quoted}](name=NotSid,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=Z2H9vriu,comment-id=0000000100010000000000000001,timestamp=2017-02-14T21:58:40.162+0000) > > I agree. Net neutrality isn't *the* solution, but it is the foundation of the solution. If that falls, everything else will too. > > You don't necessarily have to break them up into smaller companies, but you can write laws that prohibit throttling, and make charging extra money for faster service to certain programs/websites illegal. If you're paying for a certain speed, you get that speed for everything, not just select websites. > > The ransom shit has to stop. Honestly, the ransom shit is illegal in the first place. Companies should simply go "Would you rather we call the FCC on this?" and that will stop them dead in their tracks. Again, Trump's tweet as linked by Malza said "Net Neutrality is the Fairness Doctrine." That alone tells me "I'm not gonna let my cabinet member abolish it." Right now it's mostly a matter of companies overcharging because they can get away with it. The ransom shit needs to be straight up reported to the government because that is outright illegal.
> [{quoted}](name=Busty Demoness,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=Z2H9vriu,comment-id=00000001000100000000000000010000,timestamp=2017-02-14T22:15:58.077+0000) > > Honestly, the ransom shit is illegal in the first place. Companies should simply go "Would you rather we call the FCC on this?" and that will stop them dead in their tracks. > > Again, Trump's tweet as linked by Malza said "Net Neutrality is the Fairness Doctrine." That alone tells me "I'm not gonna let my cabinet member abolish it." > > Right now it's mostly a matter of companies overcharging because they can get away with it. The ransom shit needs to be straight up reported to the government because that is outright illegal. Do you even know what the Fairness Doctrine was? I promise you Trump is not using that term in a positive sense, especially when the tweet was directed at Obama's support of net neutrality. Trump is objectively against net neutrality.
: > [{quoted}](name=TheLittlestLulu,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=nrXhtxiX,comment-id=00040001,timestamp=2017-02-14T15:14:24.858+0000) > > So what lesson was the children supposed to learn? I assume you apply the same argument to anchor babies. They were born here "illegally" but the parents werent so punish them by sending the parents home and keep the kids. The 3rd child is born "illegally", punish the parents by not letting them raise it and put in foster care. Both of these would revolve around a terrible system though: foster care. -.- so... fix foster care?! because yea, otherwise the children are punished just as hard.
> [{quoted}](name=Alaron Mercer,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=nrXhtxiX,comment-id=000400010001,timestamp=2017-02-14T15:41:02.413+0000) > > They were born here "illegally" but the parents werent so punish them by sending the parents home and keep the kids. > The 3rd child is born "illegally", punish the parents by not letting them raise it and put in foster care. lol you might as well just say we should sterilize the parents cause that would be less cruel than straight up taking their children from them.
: > [{quoted}](name=TheLittlestLulu,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=nrXhtxiX,comment-id=00040001,timestamp=2017-02-14T15:14:24.858+0000) > > So what lesson was the children supposed to learn? They're talking to the irresponsible mother, rather than the children. I'm not saying we should forsake the children or those who are trying to be responsible but have to deal with unplanned pregnancies. See my post below the one you just quoted. This is a matter regarding the parents more than the children.
> [{quoted}](name=Busty Demoness,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=nrXhtxiX,comment-id=000400010000,timestamp=2017-02-14T15:19:37.246+0000) > > They're talking to the irresponsible mother, rather than the children. > > I'm not saying we should forsake the children or those who are trying to be responsible but have to deal with unplanned pregnancies. See my post below the one you just quoted. > > This is a matter regarding the parents more than the children. Again, what lesson was the children supposed to learn? It doesn't matter who "they" are talking to, this lesson directly effects the children as well. You can't just say that we shouldn't forsake the children and then literally in the same breath say that children should be forsaken to teach their parents a lesson.
: I think they should be able to refuse assistance after a second child. Now, I'm not saying "we're gonna tie your tube/give you a vasectomy", I'm saying "Ma'am, you have 3 children and we're giving you assistance for 2 of them because your living situation doesn't properly support them. We're not giving you more because you clearly haven't learned your lesson." EDIT: Check my next post down before you reply to this one.
> [{quoted}](name=Busty Demoness,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=nrXhtxiX,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2017-02-14T10:56:10.839+0000) > > I think they should be able to refuse assistance after a second child. > > Now, I'm not saying "we're gonna tie your tube/give you a vasectomy", I'm saying "Ma'am, you have 3 children and we're giving you assistance for 2 of them because your living situation doesn't properly support them. We're not giving you more because you clearly haven't learned your lesson." So what lesson was the children supposed to learn?
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: Too bad the the new administration wants to gut net neutrality and make what the internet monopolies are doing legal. (if your company doesn't give us money, we slow down your internet) Meaning if riot doesn't pay them, a lot of NA players are going to have like 200-400 ping.
> [{quoted}](name=batosia95136,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=EM3rniMF,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-02-14T01:23:26.818+0000) > > Too bad the the new administration wants to gut net neutrality and make what the internet monopolies are doing legal. (if your company doesn't give us money, we slow down your internet) > > Meaning if riot doesn't pay them, a lot of NA players are going to have like 200-400 ping. um excuse me Trump doesn't like net neutrality so that means it's bad
Rioter Comments
: [Warning] CRINGE HEAVY VIDEO
Sorry but there is nothing on Earth that could surpass this video in that regard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJQhDkpT5aY
: pls keep in mind that youre part of an incredibly rare minority. so while its understandable that it might be frustrating to you, try to sound less entitled. because you cant blame game developers for not keeping less than 5% of the population in mind at every step of their work. they try to keep options for the colorblind, but sometimes it happens that youre being overlooked. its not wrong to ask, but its not right to expect to always have people think of these issues when making skins or texture designs for a game.
> [{quoted}](name=Critmaster Garen,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=btn5YeVo,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2017-02-12T19:48:16.369+0000) > > pls keep in mind that youre part of an incredibly rare minority. > > so while its understandable that it might be frustrating to you, try to sound less entitled. because you cant blame game developers for not keeping less than 5% of the population in mind at every step of their work. > > they try to keep options for the colorblind, but sometimes it happens that youre being overlooked. its not wrong to ask, but its not right to expect to always have people think of these issues when making skins or texture designs for a game. Releasing the snowdown map like that was overlooking. Releasing bloodmoon in the same state within a couple of months after people pointed out this problem with snowdown is just straight up ignoring.
: ADC is a joke now, tanks do all the damage and assassins can literally one shot anything. There you go.
> [{quoted}](name=Tsukanami,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=8dE3khV2,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2017-02-12T19:16:42.399+0000) > > ADC is a joke now, tanks do all the damage and assassins can literally one shot anything. There you go. ??? Are we even playing the same game? Have you seen all the QQ threads about ADCs abusing lethality?
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: One Trick Ponies deserve no respect or recognition
OP is a singed OTP and is trolling. There I saved you all a post.
: Is it okay if I AFK if I have a Soraka as my support?
If you use literally more than once in a single sentence you deserve to be trolled.
: AAAAAWWWWW SHIT YALL LASAGNA CAT IS BACK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yELOiYgR2aI
: AAAAAWWWWW SHIT YALL LASAGNA CAT IS BACK
seriously nobody else is excited about this?
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: He's still an above average mid laner.
> [{quoted}](name=ShaolinToilet,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ZQ1uXRZE,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2017-02-09T19:08:51.177+0000) > > He's still an above average mid laner. imagine being this dumb
Show more

TheLittlestLulu

Level 30 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion