i don't think marksman should automatically be the carry class

especially not when you balance them only around laning vs each other we have had a lot of issues around early game marksmen like {{champion:21}} {{champion:236}} {{champion:202}} {{champion:119}} becoming late game powerhouses while still being bullies, and the opposite for {{champion:67}} {{champion:29}} {{champion:96}} {{champion:222}} . it kind of muddies the point of picking a hypercarry when other marksmen don't fall off or a lane bully when "hypercarry" marksman aren't exceptionally weak in lane. it makes which one you pick a lot less significant than it should be. i think they need to have a larger variance in power curve. not to mention itemization needs to change; maybe we shouldn't enforce the idea that they should all be 6 damage item glass cannons, or at least let the old 4 damage 2 defense builds be viable again so that they have an actual fallback pattern what do u guys think

We're testing a new feature that gives the option to view discussion comments in chronological order. Some testers have pointed out situations in which they feel a linear view could be helpful, so we'd like see how you guys make use of it.

Report as:
Offensive Spam Harassment Incorrect Board