Why is the community hating on a Challenger Wukong main?

In the Quick Gameplay thoughts yesterday, a lot of people downvoted Gorilla for trying to speakup about his main, if you missed it, here's the link: https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/developer-corner/zpaM5Ki1-quick-gameplay-thoughts-october-5?sort_type=best&comment=0002 Yes I know, his comment wasn't constructive and informative, but I'm sure as hell he never posted asking for buffs in the last 4 years when Wukong was never touched before introducing those items {{item:3095}} {{item:3147}} . I understand his frustration of trying to be competitive while his main is getting ignored and constant nerfs when there are others champs that are WAY more busted atm{{champion:104}} {{champion:39}} {{champion:6}} {{champion:84}} {{champion:28}} that can even do better and still have more options to survive/escape/outplay the enemy the more you play the champ and forge your skills. Why do most of the board community support reworking {{champion:82}} for the **_Second _** time yet {{champion:62}} never receives the same amount of support? is it because you favor certain active board members and you'd feel guilty if you didn't speak up? In the following comment https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/developer-corner/zpaM5Ki1-quick-gameplay-thoughts-october-5?sort_type=best&comment=0067 someone claimed that Meddler probably has no answer. isn't his **JOB** as the Design Director to have an answer after 2 years of Rework promise along with the cancelled Diver's Rework? and if he doesn't , who should be responsible to compensate? Patience is a virtue, but when your voice is getting constantly unheard then it will definitely trigger aggression and anger, thus the result is shown in the first link I posted.
Best New

We're testing a new feature that gives the option to view discussion comments in chronological order. Some testers have pointed out situations in which they feel a linear view could be helpful, so we'd like see how you guys make use of it.

Report as:
Offensive Spam Harassment Incorrect Board