: What are you on, and are you sharing?
> [{quoted}](name=SammyDayspring,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=UJWfgf1i,comment-id=000f,timestamp=2019-03-12T00:40:47.551+0000) > > What are you on, and are you sharing? A balanced diet of Teemo shrooms and Zyra plants. Also no.
Savatgy (NA)
: Ranked Theory: Riot plants a bot with varying difficulty in the team that it wants to lose
The Illuminati are joining our games and feeding the enemy to keep up low rated and struggling so we don't notice their plan for world domination.
Uriel (EUW)
: A vague "kill yourself"
It definitely is banable, but the system looks for keywords and if what the person said does not contain those it probably won't get picked up on. If he gets reported often a riot employee will look into his behavior and hit him with the ban hammer though.
  Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Berel Hawdos,realm=EUNE,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=9chvtwMp,comment-id=0034,timestamp=2019-03-10T01:23:21.744+0000) > > Has anyone read the new Kayle lore. Riot just hires edgy teen fanfiction writers from Thumblr these days. ah yeah you mean the one where she shows up from another dimension inexplicably and is like the best at everything ever? and she has to kill her bitch sister who is a total assface and like totes evil? OH WAIT THATS HER OLD LORE
> [{quoted}](name=lowrankhero,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=9chvtwMp,comment-id=00340000,timestamp=2019-03-10T01:36:18.872+0000) > > ah yeah you mean the one where she shows up from another dimension inexplicably and is like the best at everything ever? and she has to kill her bitch sister who is a total assface and like totes evil? > > OH WAIT THATS HER OLD LORE No I mean the one where she represses everybody for some reason and goes psycho when morg kills her boyfriend? purging the entire town. Then she accidentally kills her dad and decides to go rediscover herself only to double down on her initial views. Clearly law and order = genocide and repression. Much expectation such subversion. Original character do not steal!
: Old league lore was bad, like really bad.
Has anyone read the new Kayle lore. Riot just hires edgy teen fanfiction writers from Thumblr these days.
: Old league lore was bad, like really bad.
New lore is worse. At least before there was less to cringe at.
: After Kayle's visual update, do you realize who this game is now marketed to?
I doubt that many find the new butterface, giraffe-neck Kayle model sexy, but maybe I'm in the minority on this one.
: Aether Wings Kayle
It's not just her Legendary skin, her lore as a whole was efd up in the most embarrassing lore rework yet. I'm not sure if the writing staff are somehow going trough puberty again or riot is hiring school children, but this has been some of the most cringy/edgy shit I've ever seen. You can sum up the entire lore of Morgana and Kayle with: "Authority and order bad, anarchy and chaos gud!". Seriously riot grow the ef up.
Grimmrok (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=KingBlackthorn1,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=FhZX9zFJ,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2019-03-05T07:33:15.418+0000) > > Not. All. Woman. Characters. Are. There. For. Your. Attractions. Then how can you explain Rek'Sai? {{champion:421}}{{champion:421}}{{champion:421}}{{champion:421}}
> [{quoted}](name=Grimmrok,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=FhZX9zFJ,comment-id=00060000,timestamp=2019-03-05T08:28:57.561+0000) > > Then how can you explain Rek'Sai? > {{champion:421}}{{champion:421}}{{champion:421}}{{champion:421}} I'd Colossal smash Rek'Sai if she'd let me.
Grimmrok (EUNE)
: Kayle, why is she so ugly? (rant)
I agree that base Kayle is kinda ugly but most of her skins look way better now.
Elipo (NA)
: I am a woman with no creativity, therefore on my main account my summoner name is my irl name. I have been bulied in game just for being a woman, but that doesn't mean every male in league is a crappy person. There's even been cases in wich other players in game defend me from those bullies. Also: this year I've seen way less sexism in game and I think it's because Riot takes sexist flamming really seriously (so, yay I guess). So let's not jump to extremes, please. Tjere are jerks and that 8s not only in gaming but around the world sone peopple are nasty, let's not generalize. Also, please report those jerks, people!
> [{quoted}](name=Elipo,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=l6g3GAa2,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2018-09-08T00:13:38.784+0000) > > I am a woman with no creativity, therefore on my main account my summoner name is my irl name. I have been bulied in game just for being a woman, but that doesn't mean every male in league is a crappy person. There's even been cases in wich other players in game defend me from those bullies. Also: this year I've seen way less sexism in game and I think it's because Riot takes sexist flamming really seriously (so, yay I guess). So let's not jump to extremes, please. Tjere are jerks and that 8s not only in gaming but around the world sone peopple are nasty, let's not generalize. Also, please report those jerks, people! I'd recommend muting and then reporting such players, the only thing you'll get from continuous interactions with them is frustration. The competitive nature of the game tends to bring out the worst in people and I have received my fair share of flaming just as any league player despite being a man. You may have gotten a little extra seeing as when a game starts to go south it'd be pretty easy for you to get singled out as scapegoat to blame. Even with constant reporting and banning of toxic players some amount of toxicity will always be present in league and I wouldn't recommend the game to anyone who can't handle that, be they man or woman.
D357R0Y3R (EUW)
: Can we talk about Sexism in League and its impacts?
> [{quoted}](name=D357R0Y3R,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=l6g3GAa2,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-09-07T21:53:38.499+0000) > > The problem isn't that right now the majority of players are men, the problem is that majority treats the minority like shit **when it comes to playing competitively** (i'm not talking about casually playing one game or two). > > So can we say that "we're welcoming any female players" like you guys say? because it doesn't look like that when I see on a daily basis attacks being made towards someone's gender > > When you insult people based on their GENDERS and not THEMSELVES, would it encourage the entire gender to be attracted into a field, it's just logic wtf. > If you want to welcome female players, then either stop insulting anyone. Or start insulting them while not bringing their gender into the discussion. Do we even know what % of male players are sexist towards women in game? I have never been and I don't see why I should be responsible for the people that are. Isn't it likely that those people are just toxic in nature and the main reason for their sexist comments is that they see it as an easy and effective way to insult women. I highly doubt they treat their male teammates any better and the only reason they aren't attacking their gender is because it's ineffective, instead opting to attack their intelligence or strongly implying that they are homosexuals(I don't want to eat a ban hammer, but you all know what I mean). Competitive games are known for breeding toxic communities so if that is not something an individual can handle, I can only suggest playing with friends or finding a different type of game. When faced with toxicity it is always best to use the mute, block and report features liberally.
: Unpopular Opinion
Banning men from the panels in question is sexist and discriminatory for the same reasons racial segregation is racist and discriminatory. If you'd like to argue that it is not sexist please apply those arguments to racial segregation not being racist and see what happens. If Riot didn't realize that they were being sexist from the very beginning I'd consider that an even greater cause for concern. Klein shouted insults at the majority of the customers of the company he worked for and told them to kill themselves(I realize it was meant to be a joke, yes) name one business that would allow an employee to do that without firing them. Fighting discrimination with more discrimination will never work, you trying to justify it shows the kind of person you are.
: > [{quoted}](name=Champion Skin,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=VNiEFLjt,comment-id=00060001,timestamp=2018-09-07T17:54:51.309+0000) > > Majority of people in power work to stay in power men/people in general be damned because most individuals put their own interests first > > A huge majority of men are not even close to having any power maybe they have a decent income but then again the wast majority of homeless people and the people at the bottom are men > > And does this mean that women (and people in general) can't face sexism from people who don't have power? (you know like random people in online games who don't have any power over women at all in the context of the game... or is being able to type/talk in chat somehow a form of power?) If the gender of the people at the top, the judicial officials, business executives, political figures, every president, police and military leaders, religious leaders, Best selling Authors are of a greater percentage than ladies, then statistically its men acting against men to gain power. men are more likely to be the leader in any situation to create a system that benefits themselves to the most beneficial as possible to them selves given the level of power that they can exert given their position or financial status. Men are creating the world where men are homeless. Men are creating the wars that men are fighting. men are paying the employees the poverty level wages and men are working it. If men want to have a better world, its nothing that a woman is doing to stop them, what woman president is forcing men to be homeless? our male president is allowing houses to stay vacant so that male owned banks can hold "financial assets" to sell to, back to the needy public for high prices. statistically more often at least.
> [{quoted}](name=Tree Citizen,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=VNiEFLjt,comment-id=000600010000,timestamp=2018-09-08T01:26:12.933+0000) > > If the gender of the people at the top, the judicial officials, business executives, political figures, every president, police and military leaders, religious leaders, Best selling Authors are of a greater percentage than ladies, then statistically its men acting against men to gain power. men are more likely to be the leader in any situation to create a system that benefits themselves to the most beneficial as possible to them selves given the level of power that they can exert given their position or financial status. Men are creating the world where men are homeless. Men are creating the wars that men are fighting. men are paying the employees the poverty level wages and men are working it. If men want to have a better world, its nothing that a woman is doing to stop them, what woman president is forcing men to be homeless? our male president is allowing houses to stay vacant so that male owned banks can hold "financial assets" to sell to, back to the needy public for high prices. statistically more often at least. So "men are more likely to be the leader in any situation to create a system that benefits themselves" but in their system men make up the majority of suicides and homeless people? And you think this system is sexist towards women because?
: I'd like to thank all the Rioters who act professional and mature constantly
It's not that I dislike any of the people you mentioned, but I don't think not telling your customers to kill themselves is a massive accomplishment.
Malza (NA)
: They didn’t break any laws.
> [{quoted}](name=Malza,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Kwmwnhkq,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-09-07T19:47:59.339+0000) > > They didn’t break any laws. I'm no lawyer, but whether it was legal or not it was still sexist to ban men from the panel and I believe it warrants an apology. Not issuing an apology would mean they believe they did nothing wrong making Riot a sexist company. Personally I am not comfortable with financially supporting a company that discriminates against me so I will not be doing so until they apologize.
: There is no civil case. This was a private event (PAX was ticket access), so the rules regarding things are quite different. Don't spout shit you know nothing about to sensationalize things. Furthermore, the panel WASN'T the only thing at PAX. There was other shit to do. People needed to have put on their big boy pants, go to another showroom for a few hours, then come back at 2:30. That's literally as simple as it can be. Yet so many people sat there and got outraged and ruined their own vacation and experience fuming about how they couldn't enter a panel when they specifically wanted to.
> [{quoted}](name=Oleandervine,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Kwmwnhkq,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-09-07T19:44:13.336+0000) > > There is no civil case. This was a private event (PAX was ticket access), so the rules regarding things are quite different. Don't spout shit you know nothing about to sensationalize things. > Furthermore, the panel WASN'T the only thing at PAX. There was other shit to do. People needed to have put on their big boy pants, go to another showroom for a few hours, then come back at 2:30. That's literally as simple as it can be. Yet so many people sat there and got outraged and ruined their own vacation and experience fuming about how they couldn't enter a panel when they specifically wanted to. I'm sorry I was born wrong. I'm sorry I'm white. I'm sorry I'm male.
: If you're happy that Riot was forced to let DZK go, that's fine.
You can't really expect to take a dump on the majority of the customers of the company you work for and keep your job. The difference between Klein and most victims of SJW witch hunts is that the "crimes" committed by them were unintentional. They didn't mean to offend anyone, SJWs just happen to be offended by anything and everything. Can you really tell me Klein is in the same position as them with a straight face? If anything I'm surprised they didn't fire him sooner.
: Kind of makes sense actually ....
Inb4 this gets locked like every other thread on the issue.
Rioter Comments
: Aatox QoL that will help him
I agree with everything and would like to add a buff to W as well like a stronger slow or a faster activation.
: Changing Aatrox numbers won't fix how clunky he is, he needs quality of life changes
His Q needs a faster animation and his W needs to trigger faster.

Berel Hawdos

Level 42 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion