: Report for int feeding does what exactly??
the same goes to me ... it appears it is about how much report he gets because lately, I had such an int feeder trolling for no reason until now nothing happened to him...
zPOOPz (NA)
: well, we kind of want you to not accept friend request from people who try to add you "after he trolled a game"
who is "we" refer too exactly ... but I agree I didn't even know it was him
rujitra (NA)
: Why are you adding friends who are not your friends?
: > Riot will ban you based on/if: > > ... > > Multiple people report you (absolutely a factor) False. I explained it to you in your own thread, so I'll drop the permalink [here](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/50zH1Y3v-unfair-permaban-refund-possible?comment=0000000000000000000000000000), but multiple reports do not influence the likelihood that you get punished. > You have a bad reputation (bad honor level) (absolutely a factor) False. Honor Level does not influence your likelihood to get punished - the only point where Honor and punishments coincide is that your Honor Level drops when you get punished, and that your Honor Level for a given match is nixed if you're validly reported. If you're getting punished more frequently at lower Honor levels, it's because you're continuing to misbehave despite being punished before, not because the lower Honor level has some invisible effect on report validity. > The frequency of how often people report you (absolutely a factor) False. Being reported frequently means nothing if all of the reports are false. There's a _very_ low probability that getting a dramatic number of reports which turn up with no evidence to punish you _could_ be forwarded for manual review/audit, but even in those cases, no misbehavior = no punishment. > You've had punishment before (absolutely a factor) Having a previous punishment history in and of itself doesn't influence the likelihood that you'll be punished again. There is a certain period shortly _following_ a punishment in which you're placed more-or-less under greater scrutiny, but having a punishment history doesn't affect whether or not you'll get punished again. So, no - not a factor. > The bot detects you flaming (sometimes a factor) Strange how the four previous things, which are _not_ factors, you call "absolutely a factor" in being punished, but one of the things that _legitimately **is** a factor_ in whether or not a player gets punished, you say is "sometimes a factor". If the IFS detects you flaming, you will get punished for it. There's plenty enough evidence on the _Player Behavior_ board to show that yes, flaming will get you punished. > The people who reported you have good reputations (aka honor level) (possibly a factor) False. Honor Level has zero impact on report validity. Reports from Honor Level 5 players have the exact same weight as those from Honor Level 0 players. > The people who reported you have spent more money on the game than you (possibly a factor) False. Honestly, you're going to have to explain how you could even humor this one. > The people who reported you have a higher win rate than you (possibly a factor) Once again: **_No, there are no external factors which influence whether or not a report is deemed valid. It doesn't matter if someone has a higher Honor Level, a higher win rate, or spent more money than you, their reports have the same weight as everyone else._** **_The only thing that determines whether or not a report is valid is your own behavior. 87.5% of your list is false, with the only actual factor being passed off as "sometimes a factor"._**
about what we see on posts here it is hard to believe who and who
The 13th (NA)
: I think you're nitpicking when you know the decision made by riot was wrong. I firmly believe Riot's algorithm works against you if more than 1 person reports you. The system needs work. Any sane person could see this is not a bannable offence, and was acceptable behavior that didn't violate a single one of the rules in the terms of use. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that this guy got screwed because multiple people turned on him and reported him. That's pretty much how the game works. You suck, people report you, you're banned.
Talonyte (NA)
: Yeah, this happened to me too. I was defending myself from my whole team being way more toxic to me and just defending myself.
dude... they told me literally " "Defending yourself", "he started first", "he said worse things" aren't excuses." that's their logic accept the insult and move on or get a ban
The 13th (NA)
: Ban system is absolutely corrupt. This happened to me too. I was also banned for defending myself from an entire team of toxic harassers. The enemy team was toxic too but not to the extent that my team was having full blown discussions about how bad I was from the start while telling the enemy team my location and everything I was doing so they could come and kill me etc.
same happened to me and I posted many posts about that and some of them got deleted, they just don't accept what they are wrong at {{sticker:zombie-brand-clap}}
: Why is this a ban?
Just go see my posts... and you will know why it is useless to post here
The 13th (NA)
: There's no explanation lol. They made a mistake but won't own up to it because it's a million dollar company and they don't care about you. Toxic people who get away with things will end up spending more money than people who get bullied out of playing the game and that's really all that riot cares about imo
: Why is this a ban?
I don't get it either... what did they said to you?
Pyrosan (NA)
: You aren't allowed to show the names of people if you're shaming them, blur out their username
: you cant name shame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> [{quoted}](name=DartExplosion10,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=Pk4AHJoh,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-08-15T17:43:16.289+0000) > > you cant name shame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! what do you mean ?
Rioter Comments
: I can see that, majority of the comments so far seem to agree with me but theyre all getting downvoted xddd maybe i can send this in and be like "yo ppl dont think this is toxic but ur policy sucks" Btw if you're in for a laugh, read the rujitra's guy comments above looool
well after reading all that, I understand pretty much... they don't want you to comment about what your team do, and also they want you to say good words to your enemy I had that argument before and that what I've been told my advice .... seek another game... if it is not for my childhood friend I would have uninstalled this ages ago playing like this is not fun anymore {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: I can see that, majority of the comments so far seem to agree with me but theyre all getting downvoted xddd maybe i can send this in and be like "yo ppl dont think this is toxic but ur policy sucks" Btw if you're in for a laugh, read the rujitra's guy comments above looool
well... I don't think the downvote is from real players, anyway, downvote doesn't mean you are wrong about that guy comment when I saw how much u argue I thought "it is pain in the...." to go read all of that, but since u say it is funny ill give it a shot {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}}
SanZero (EUNE)
: Really ?? >You acknowledge this information is taken from another poster, zPoopz, from your first post. Not new information. It is totally different from what he said, do you acknowledge that they are not the same ? > Yes. A long time ago, from season 3 (when I started) to I think season 5-6, we had the Tribunal that comprised of regular players like you and me that will judged chat logs of people who got reported one too many times. We had full chat log of the whole team plus game play statistics. As the game player base grew, Tribunal couldn't keep up with the volume of reports that need to be judged and people were being punished months from the time they were reported (essentially allowing people to be toxic for months without receiving any kind of punishment or ban). > > Rito created the Instant Feedback System (known as IFS) to automate the judging and punishment process. It is a machine learning system and was initially fed data from Tribunal. We were told RIto does manually review cases to make sure the IFS is working properly and players always have the option to submit a support ticket to ask for a human manual review. Otherwise, all our reported chat logs are reviewed and judged by a machine with no human involved. > > There are 2 parts to the IFS: the chat part and the game play part. > > The chat part is quite easy because all it needs to do is scan text-base chat and score the toxicity based on its machine learning algorithm. It should activate fairly quickly within minutes. The punishment for chat base toxicity is based on 2 things: frequency * severity. > > If the chat is deemed mildly toxic, you will have a certain amount of black marks on your account. Once your toxic meter reaches a certain threshold, you will be issue a punishment based on 4 tier of escalating punishment: 10 game chat restrictions, 25 game chat restrictions, 14-day ban, perma-ban. Wherever you are on the punishment ladder, you'll just receive the next tier (e.g. if you already have a 25 game CR, you will receive 14-day ban on your next punishment). As explained, if you chat is deemed mildly toxic and it does not push your toxic meter to punishment level, then you will not receive any punishment. Because of that, it may gives players the perceived assumption that the IFS is not working and your report against a player is not doing anything. Rito does give some linencies to mild toxicity because they understand sometimes players may have an off day and becomes mildly toxic on very rare occasion. You will NEVER be punished just from one game of mild toxicity. You will only be punished if you are frequently mildly toxic in your games. (not sure if this answer your question). > > Rito has a list of word what they called zero tolerance: homophobic, racism, sexism, hate speech, etc. that is more or less a word filter. If you use any of those word, you will be escalated straight to 14-day ban even if that is the only game you are toxic in. This is the severity part of the equation. > > The second part of the IFS is the game play detection for such things as trolling, inting, griefing, etc. This is the part the community complain the most and most will agree it doesn't really do its job very well. I've been told there are a lot of human manual review of reports for these categories. that's exactly what he says, now lets put light on it and sum up his main points... he talked about the system how it was and how it is, he talked about his 2 sides the chat and the behavior, he talked about the severity and frequency now lets see what i said ... > as for the second, it is about the automated system or what it called Instant Feedback System (IFS), "not gonna bring any comments now" : > as this League of legends empowering the reports that violate the rules -like what happend to me- the system well punished them by the IFS duo to such taunting; harassment, offensive remarks, intentionally feeding, etc... > the punishment will take place duo gauges the behavior in the game before punishments are issued and thus the punishment well take place i talked about the reports, and the limits which punishment take effect you still think they are the same ? not even in words nor the meaning >Your advice above was in the now removed post, Part 4 V2. This advice is in your 3rd post regarding the IFS: please... the only same part is blitz part, if its hurts that much you could simply removed it not the whole post becuse some point that is similar in other >I can see how there are some differences here, but I think it'd be better for you to have gone back and edited a post, or comment on your old post with the edit, since there are some changes, but not enough to make a new post about. are all different except one point above >I apologize that you feel ganged up on, no need i already got ganged up enough... and still you guys speak like we are talking about different things while it is plain and simple thanks anyway i think i had enough of this {{sticker:zombie-brand-facepalm}}
if you would say the same things then there is no need to replay or ill report it as spam
: >as for the second, it is about the automated system or what it called Instant Feedback System (IFS), "not gonna bring any comments now" : as this League of legends empowering the reports that violate the rules -like what happend to me- the system well punished them by the IFS duo to such taunting; harassment, offensive remarks, intentionally feeding, etc... the punishment will take place duo gauges the behavior in the game before punishments are issued and thus the punishment well take place You acknowledge this information is taken from another poster, zPoopz, from your first post. Not new information. >1- the same advice as always, don't use the chat 2- if you ever used it don't write a word that may seem bad on its own even if it between a sentence or it will be on frequency side of (IFS) 3- words like bad, useless, ff, izi, troll report, also count.... so avoid using those based on my experience even if it a replay or in normal conversation 4- the matter of fact that more report = a punishment is true, opposite to what been written on here "https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/201752884", so yes ... ask for reports. 5- Blitz bot always right you know Your advice above was in the now removed post, Part 4 V2. This advice is in your 3rd post regarding the IFS: >1 - take the penalty as it is, don't ask about it 2- as I said before, everything well is used against you, even thing that you don't know so don't tire your self about it 3- about the things you don't know about it don't ask about it 4- don't say any word that if you put it by itself on paper well appear as negative because you will judge by your word alone 5- Blitz bot always is right I can see how there are some differences here, but I think it'd be better for you to have gone back and edited a post, or comment on your old post with the edit, since there are some changes, but not enough to make a new post about. Please keep in mind that other people post on here and want to have their material viewed as much as you do; making several posts about a similar or same topic diminishes the visibility of other posts on the board. I apologize that you feel ganged up on, but we're all trying to give our opinions to help you in seeing the reasons for the removal. Also, I was informed KnightsKemplar would be stepping out, so I felt it appropriate to answer your questions at this time.
Really ?? >You acknowledge this information is taken from another poster, zPoopz, from your first post. Not new information. It is totally different from what he said, do you acknowledge that they are not the same ? > Yes. A long time ago, from season 3 (when I started) to I think season 5-6, we had the Tribunal that comprised of regular players like you and me that will judged chat logs of people who got reported one too many times. We had full chat log of the whole team plus game play statistics. As the game player base grew, Tribunal couldn't keep up with the volume of reports that need to be judged and people were being punished months from the time they were reported (essentially allowing people to be toxic for months without receiving any kind of punishment or ban). > > Rito created the Instant Feedback System (known as IFS) to automate the judging and punishment process. It is a machine learning system and was initially fed data from Tribunal. We were told RIto does manually review cases to make sure the IFS is working properly and players always have the option to submit a support ticket to ask for a human manual review. Otherwise, all our reported chat logs are reviewed and judged by a machine with no human involved. > > There are 2 parts to the IFS: the chat part and the game play part. > > The chat part is quite easy because all it needs to do is scan text-base chat and score the toxicity based on its machine learning algorithm. It should activate fairly quickly within minutes. The punishment for chat base toxicity is based on 2 things: frequency * severity. > > If the chat is deemed mildly toxic, you will have a certain amount of black marks on your account. Once your toxic meter reaches a certain threshold, you will be issue a punishment based on 4 tier of escalating punishment: 10 game chat restrictions, 25 game chat restrictions, 14-day ban, perma-ban. Wherever you are on the punishment ladder, you'll just receive the next tier (e.g. if you already have a 25 game CR, you will receive 14-day ban on your next punishment). As explained, if you chat is deemed mildly toxic and it does not push your toxic meter to punishment level, then you will not receive any punishment. Because of that, it may gives players the perceived assumption that the IFS is not working and your report against a player is not doing anything. Rito does give some linencies to mild toxicity because they understand sometimes players may have an off day and becomes mildly toxic on very rare occasion. You will NEVER be punished just from one game of mild toxicity. You will only be punished if you are frequently mildly toxic in your games. (not sure if this answer your question). > > Rito has a list of word what they called zero tolerance: homophobic, racism, sexism, hate speech, etc. that is more or less a word filter. If you use any of those word, you will be escalated straight to 14-day ban even if that is the only game you are toxic in. This is the severity part of the equation. > > The second part of the IFS is the game play detection for such things as trolling, inting, griefing, etc. This is the part the community complain the most and most will agree it doesn't really do its job very well. I've been told there are a lot of human manual review of reports for these categories. that's exactly what he says, now lets put light on it and sum up his main points... he talked about the system how it was and how it is, he talked about his 2 sides the chat and the behavior, he talked about the severity and frequency now lets see what i said ... > as for the second, it is about the automated system or what it called Instant Feedback System (IFS), "not gonna bring any comments now" : > as this League of legends empowering the reports that violate the rules -like what happend to me- the system well punished them by the IFS duo to such taunting; harassment, offensive remarks, intentionally feeding, etc... > the punishment will take place duo gauges the behavior in the game before punishments are issued and thus the punishment well take place i talked about the reports, and the limits which punishment take effect you still think they are the same ? not even in words nor the meaning >Your advice above was in the now removed post, Part 4 V2. This advice is in your 3rd post regarding the IFS: please... the only same part is blitz part, if its hurts that much you could simply removed it not the whole post becuse some point that is similar in other >I can see how there are some differences here, but I think it'd be better for you to have gone back and edited a post, or comment on your old post with the edit, since there are some changes, but not enough to make a new post about. are all different except one point above >I apologize that you feel ganged up on, no need i already got ganged up enough... and still you guys speak like we are talking about different things while it is plain and simple thanks anyway i think i had enough of this {{sticker:zombie-brand-facepalm}}
: They didn't even mention the rape part. I didn't insult anyone besides "grow up", which is more than appropriate to a team filled with raging man-childs. I didn't argue besides "I'm not your punching bag" nor did I flame, I was just stating thing as is, unless you count "Rengar isn't here again" as flaming (in which the entirety of the team already mentioned that he's never there) And no, I don't make the rules, never said I did. However, I do expect Riot to play by their own rules. Even if I did agree to it, I didn't break the rule. Oh and Morde was on the other team, idk why it didn't specify which one is /all and which one isn't. He gave me shit because I said "he's so fucking forgiving" and "what a skill champ", me, clearly upset about his balance when I cancelled his ult x2 by kiting yet he still ulted me the same.
don't talk reason here it won't work. in a matter of fact... don't ever use the chat in the game just to avoid all of this head hurting discuss {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: If u give us a really SECOND CHANCE, banned players, we will be respectful all life!!!!!!
we are talking about riot, even if you are right they won't give you a chance according to my experience just move on {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: “[33:29] Lil Vydöx (Jhin): bottom line is, i aint no bitch This one I could say is questionable. I listed it here because it kind of came off as a rude response to another player but this one could probably be given a pass.” - support agent Yeah chief. My first 10 game chat restricted, I fully take it. Had a 5 man premade and I admit I was a lil bit excited. My 25 game however, was literally just calling someone “acne ridden squeakerhead”. 3 words in a singular match across like 40 billion matches. To me, it feels like Riot is mechanical, cold-hearted and unrealistic. :(
true {{sticker:zombie-nunu-bummed}}
: Well it was kinda half and half. Either way, no point in opening up that one again if I’m still gonna have a 2 week suspension.
if I were in your shoe, I would consider leaving this game and move on duo their way of using their rules can you believe it, I got many posts deleted for the spam reason while the last one was totally different and I am still arguing with them about it, go see it ... you will laugh I assure you that {{sticker:zombie-brand-clap}}
: A 10 game which I’m fully responsible for. A 25 game for calling someone “acne ridden squeakerhead”, yes support did actually say I got banned for that only and closed the ticket before I could even respond ( way to go, Riot ). I decided to just finish the restriction and let it slide, not knowing I’ll get banned again for something Riot is reaching so fucking hard to justify banning me lmao
HOLY... see my experience with them if you want I post it here as part 3 ... if I like it here they will say it is spam and delete my post like what happened yesterday {{sticker:sg-lulu}}
: > [{quoted}](name=rujitra,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=imkXIVxt,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-07-21T04:28:35.798+0000) > > Virtually all of your logs would be highlighted. You flamed, insulted, and argued with people almost this entire game. You're going a little ham with your assessments of the chat logs. He wasn't flaming anyone, he was just bitching about the enemy champion (Fizz in this scenario). I get that this board likes to rail on people who get banned/punished but I don't see the point in just BSing and acting like they're doing something they're not. If you want to say he deserved it for being negative and toxic, that's fine. But let's stop with the bullshit.
BULLSEYE dude {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
: Riot always takes the bullies' side because they don't want to have to stop using their automated system. They won't even put a way to mute players into all of their game modes so the only thing you can do is sit there and take the abuse. Riot actually punishes players who defend themselves.
know ur feeling bro {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: Hey SanZero, I reviewed the removal in question, and I think if you want to talk in detail, using the discord would be a better option. We hesitate to bring up details about removals in public spaces to avoid shaming the OP (in this case, you). In general terms, we have rules against spamming similar topics repeatedly because it can drown out other, original topics on a particular sub-board, so if you're posting multiple times about exactly the same thing, especially in a short period of time, that can trigger a removal in many cases. -KnightsKemplar
: Got my post removed for THIS
I got many posts removed for a little more than this, lol... just let it go {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: > so what I learn that this is your personal opinion when you said There's a difference between an opinion and a judgement-call - an opinion is simply that, an opinion. A judgement-call is a decision based on a view of the situation from as objective a lens as possible - stripping away as much opinion and looking at all the facts as they're present. Personally, I've only been keeping tenuous track of your posts, but I frankly agree with the call to remove your repetitive posts. > my post was about the IFS with my own word of understanding that system and my advice as you say has a change then why this hateful manner of deleting without even a clear reason? They gave you a clear reason. You're spamming the boards with constant updates to your advice regarding the IFS by creating a new post whenever you come up with some revision. If all of your posts have the same general subject, with the only differences being on account of new information, why not just update the original, "Part 1" post to accommodate that new information? > is that what your friend above says : > > "We hesitate to bring up details about removals in public spaces to avoid shaming the OP (in this case, you)." > > ??? What KnightsKemplar is saying is that the Moderation Team prefers to hold discussions about removals/moderator actions in Discord, since discussing removals (and similar-such moderator actions) can potentially run the risk of shaming/decrying the actioned player (e.g, you) for having broken the rules that resulted in the removal/action.
Hi, again... another new one wants to gang on me ... yes I pretty much welcome that >based on a view of the situation from as objective a lens as possible their view is wrong and I proved that... then why? > but I frankly agree with the call to remove your repetitive posts. again you call it repetitive, we are talking the same language we know what repetitive mean, how is reapeting things over, and over like, why you all acting like things have a different meaning to you? > If all of your posts have the same general subject, with the only differences being on account of new information, why not just update the original, "Part 1" post to accommodate that new information? no, it is not the same thing however what was on the part one is commenter way of saying it >What KnightsKemplar is saying is that the Moderation Team prefers to hold discussions about removals/moderator actions in Discord, since discussing removals (and similar-such moderator actions) can potentially run the risk of shaming/decrying the actioned player (e.g, you) for having broken the rules that resulted in the removal/action. and I am still sure no rule was broke upon that. you see you are making this matter bigger than it is, it is just simple is it spam or not? if it spam then for what reason ? you guys said it a rephrase so it is spam, and I proved that it is not you guys said it is about your previous posts . and I also proved it is not u guys better think of good reasons right now {{sticker:slayer-jinx-unamused}}
: "It's just" argument.
there is no such thing that likes ""It's just" argument." here, just o let you know {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: > [{quoted}](name=Lil Vydöx,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=uIZkOJok,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-07-21T13:01:58.503+0000) > > Thank you for the sound advice! I don’t plan to use the in game chat anymore after this 2 weeks. Good luck out there! Yeah hope it helps and good luck to you :)
well said guys...well done {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}}
: Chat Restriction
my advice don't use chat or everything well be used against you, just let it go they won't listen {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: Why does Riot always take the bully's side?
I don't know if it about "bully side", but sure they will not be on yours {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: RIOT Supports Bigotry!
well, they are unfair... I agree with that {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: I'm very certain I'm banned unjustly
that's cute... I got also a penalty and many of my posts deleted unjustly...tell me about it {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: Chat restriction.... I cant understand why...
And you will never know why belive me {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: Hey, Referring to my removal, "Things you must know about the penalty system (PART 4) v2 * You rephrase what another poster had said in your first post about the report system. * You then include the advice that you had provided in Part 3, but with some changes. So on those grounds I considered this spam. I understand the need to inform others about the IFS, but you had already done so in prior discussions. >I'll also correct you that "it only takes 1 report to trigger a review of one's game." So, please do not encourage others to call for reports in game. This did not contribute to why your post was removed. However, the number of reports does not affect whether or not someone's chat logs will be reviewed or whether or not that player will be punished.
Oh and I forgot to mention ... please, I want to discuss the same thing with the same person... not always someone comes with diffrint point of view and different way of saying things.. what am I? a public response machine? you said : > If you have any questions about this moderation action, don't hesitate to reach out to the Boards Moderation Team via: The NA Boards Discord The Discuss the Boards sub-board I didn't expect the whole moderation team is the one behind my deletion?
: Got my post removed for THIS
I almost had a same unclear reason, it was about spam... but clearly not spam I cant understand those guys, and I post about that too so I am not alone in this {{sticker:sg-lulu}}
: Now that's what I call a power abuse
I agree the deletion is totally about personal opinion ... look at what they say about my post > [{quoted}](name=Periscope,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=91EM5Op1,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2019-07-22T17:09:51.988+0000) > > Hey, > > Referring to my removal, "Things you must know about the penalty system (PART 4) v2 > > * You rephrase what another poster had said in your first post about the report system. > > * You then include the advice that you had provided in Part 3, but with some changes. > > So on those grounds I considered this spam. I understand the need to inform others about the IFS, but you had already done so in prior discussions. > > This did not contribute to why your post was removed. However, the number of reports does not affect whether or not someone's chat logs will be reviewed or whether or not that player will be punished. just look at > So on those grounds I considered this spam it is all about personal opinion, an obvious > Now that's what I call a power abuse {{sticker:sg-janna}}
: Hey, Referring to my removal, "Things you must know about the penalty system (PART 4) v2 * You rephrase what another poster had said in your first post about the report system. * You then include the advice that you had provided in Part 3, but with some changes. So on those grounds I considered this spam. I understand the need to inform others about the IFS, but you had already done so in prior discussions. >I'll also correct you that "it only takes 1 report to trigger a review of one's game." So, please do not encourage others to call for reports in game. This did not contribute to why your post was removed. However, the number of reports does not affect whether or not someone's chat logs will be reviewed or whether or not that player will be punished.
first, that post wasn't a what you say a "rephrase " if you please compare between what he says and what I said, and about my advice you already said : > but with some changes. so what I learn that this is your personal opinion when you said > So on those grounds I considered this spam your personal opinion should not intrude with the rules of the board. and again please it is not**THE EXACT SAME THING ** my post was about the IFS with my own word of understanding that system and my advice as you say has a change then why this hateful manner of deleting without even a clear reason? and as I said, I can bring all my posts and show you how different there is even in the advice, even about that person comment just to prove myself is that what your friend above says : > . We hesitate to bring up details about removals in public spaces to avoid shaming the OP (in this case, you). ??? {{sticker:sg-lux-2}}
Pxerkza (EUNE)
: thats what i mean the moderation of the boards is 90% personal opinions by the mods and 10% adhering to the rules
Lol they downvoted you for just that
: Hey SanZero, I reviewed the removal in question, and I think if you want to talk in detail, using the discord would be a better option. We hesitate to bring up details about removals in public spaces to avoid shaming the OP (in this case, you). In general terms, we have rules against spamming similar topics repeatedly because it can drown out other, original topics on a particular sub-board, so if you're posting multiple times about exactly the same thing, especially in a short period of time, that can trigger a removal in many cases. -KnightsKemplar
No no, I am totally fine I allow you to bring details in public first it is not spamming nor the** SAME EXACT** thing ... I can bring you the full topic and all my other topic and discuss the difference easily if you want and you see this is the rules your friend gave me > [{quoted}](name=Ulanopo,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=p1EAe971,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-07-22T01:31:04.413+0000) > > There isn't a hard rule. The Boards are moderated by a team of volunteers. When a post is reported, they review the content and made a determination if it violates the [Universal Rules](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/ITFIpNUE) and, if so, what should be done. > > In-game chat restrictions are applied by Riot. > > On the Boards, we consider the following behaviors to be low-effort: > > * Duplicate posts, especially where no new content has been added. > * Copy/Paste posts. > * Linking to unrelated or semi-related posts in another person's thread. > * Posts that serve only to complain. These can go to [RANT]. > https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/rant > > > If you have any further questions, please feel free to head to the Discord. I am 100% sure I kept them all so again .. why? I find deleting that post is offending to the rules of your board directly {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}}
Pxerkza (EUNE)
: thats what i mean the moderation of the boards is 90% personal opinions by the mods and 10% adhering to the rules
i tottaly agree {{sticker:slayer-jinx-unamused}}
Pxerkza (EUNE)
: > and keep your content constructive. if this was upheld these boards wouldn't be the cespool of {{item:3073}} it is now
Pxerkza (EUNE)
: > and keep your content constructive. if this was upheld these boards wouldn't be the cespool of {{item:3073}} it is now
My post was constructive... {{sticker:zombie-brand-clap}}
Rioter Comments
Ulanopo (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=SanZero,realm=EUNE,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=p1EAe971,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2019-07-22T01:55:06.322+0000) > > the RANT link gave me Fixed.
: > [{quoted}](name=SanZero,realm=EUNE,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=p1EAe971,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-07-22T01:48:13.718+0000) > > It sounds, but you see my question was about the behavior itself in the game or out of it... not anything else The "Now now ... They call it spam..." thread was only about you asking why another thread was removed. That's a Discuss the Boards issue, not Player Behavior.
Ulanopo (NA)
: > so what is do you mean by spam exactly? There isn't a hard rule. The Boards are moderated by a team of volunteers. When a post is reported, they review the content and made a determination if it violates the [Universal Rules](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/ITFIpNUE) and, if so, what should be done. > let me shape this question it in another way... what does riot think the spam is whither in the game or in a board ? In-game chat restrictions are applied by Riot. On the Boards, we consider the following behaviors to be low-effort: * Duplicate posts, especially where no new content has been added. * Copy/Paste posts. * Linking to unrelated or semi-related posts in another person's thread. * Posts that serve only to complain. These can go to [RANT]. https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/rant If you have any further questions, please feel free to head to the Discord.
the RANT link gave me > Error: 404 > “Looks like you’re lost. Need a map?” > This page is missing or has been moved.
Ulanopo (NA)
: > so what is do you mean by spam exactly? There isn't a hard rule. The Boards are moderated by a team of volunteers. When a post is reported, they review the content and made a determination if it violates the [Universal Rules](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/ITFIpNUE) and, if so, what should be done. > let me shape this question it in another way... what does riot think the spam is whither in the game or in a board ? In-game chat restrictions are applied by Riot. On the Boards, we consider the following behaviors to be low-effort: * Duplicate posts, especially where no new content has been added. * Copy/Paste posts. * Linking to unrelated or semi-related posts in another person's thread. * Posts that serve only to complain. These can go to [RANT]. https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/rant If you have any further questions, please feel free to head to the Discord.
can you explain what spam in-game more? I would be grateful if you provide an example too and no, I don't have discord
: Sounds like the thread was in the wrong section.
It sounds, but you see my question was about the behavior itself in the game or out of it... not anything else
Rioter Comments
Show more

SanZero

Level 200 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion