: final boss yasuo???????
I think it's very appropriate. Coming to these boards, it's always felt like Yas was Enemy#1, so making him the final boss for the boards to overcome and finally implement all their 'brilliant'(contradictory and change every 2 secc) ideas on how to balance the game.
: It's a coding thing. Essentially, I think the specific coding is that Naut's passive only applies on a *successful* basic attack, and Udyr's applies as long as he manages to simply *attack at all*. Should it be that way? Probably not. But that's my best guess as to why it is.
> [{quoted}](name=ChaosReyn,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=wlUOLsKy,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-06-13T01:30:05.558+0000) > > It's a coding thing. > > Essentially, I think the specific coding is that Naut's passive only applies on a *successful* basic attack, and Udyr's applies as long as he manages to simply *attack at all*. > > Should it be that way? Probably not. But that's my best guess as to why it is. I agree. You only have to look at how all of Udyr's stance effects are applied. Best seen in Phoenix stance, the fire is launched when Udyr begins his AA animation, not when it lands. All his abilities, I'm sure, work like that, probably because of his low range.
: how is someone with multiple dashes not safe? she even has a ranged gnar ult to peel for herself in worst case scenario. she has situational stealth a situational snare. she's a mobile ad assassin. i don't know what world you live in but most immobile champs aren't going to be able to touch her unless she wants them to. and she has the exact same playstyle as akali which many people consider to be toxic. skirmishing assassins don't work unless they are broken on a fundamental level. so she's only going to be a nightmare to balance.
> [{quoted}](name=On My Kill List,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=GPLWx6h6,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-06-13T00:29:48.425+0000) > > how is someone with multiple dashes not safe? > she even has a ranged gnar ult to peel for herself in worst case scenario. > she has situational stealth a situational snare. > she's a mobile ad assassin. > i don't know what world you live in but most immobile champs aren't going to be able to touch her unless she wants them to. > and she has the exact same playstyle as akali which many people consider to be toxic. > skirmishing assassins don't work unless they are broken on a fundamental level. > so she's only going to be a nightmare to balance. Her E has to target an enemy, and her W has protobelt distance, basically.
: Personal opinion but if you don't Jungle, don't tell your team's Jungle how to play their role.
Yeah but if my jg could stop trying to 'gank' my lane when I'm pushed under tower with a HUGE minion wave and the enemy is playing safe, has lots of escapes, more health and a higher level than the jungler himself, and basically get killed by the laner and feed him kills, that would be great. I LITERALLY prefer not getting ganks and just trying to get solo kills that this sor of 'help'.
: My reaction to Yasuo's new skin
if that's your actual reaction, you have emotional problems man.
: > [{quoted}](name=hhaavviikk,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xnYQA44v,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2019-06-10T15:52:06.391+0000) > > what exactly is auto-chess? it seems like you move champions and they do all the fighting, it sounds like you do barely anything It's like a slot machine, pure luck.
> [{quoted}](name=SuicidePlank,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xnYQA44v,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2019-06-10T15:54:27.780+0000) > > It's like a slot machine, pure luck. Nah, I sometimes play Auto-chess when I get tired of the RNG of LoL matchmaking. Sure one or two autochess games are just going to be bad luck. But you always win points if you are in the top 4 out of 8 players, and there are ways of doing that fairly consistently. Unlike LoL, you can still go up in ranking, even when you aren't blessed with the best pieces.
: > [{quoted}](name=ZaFishbone,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=H72AP3yF,comment-id=0018,timestamp=2019-06-10T08:11:37.645+0000) > > Your choices are bad and you should feel bad. Seeing as I didn’t start this thread to make fun, bm, or bash anyone I don’t feel bad. It’s here to get opinions and data. If you have input like other reasons people smurf please feel free to share. Any offense taken by my questions is created in your own mind because I do not mean any offense.
> [{quoted}](name=Phieldworker,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=H72AP3yF,comment-id=00180000,timestamp=2019-06-10T13:35:20.454+0000) > > Seeing as I didn’t start this thread to make fun, bm, or bash anyone I don’t feel bad. It’s here to get opinions and data. If you have input like other reasons people smurf please feel free to share. Any offense taken by my questions is created in your own mind because I do not mean any offense. Ppl smurf because they want to have fun. Because, at the end of the day, despite Esports, despite how seriously some people treat it, for many people LoL is still a game. And getting hard-stuck for a long time is not fun and saps your willpower. Some smurfs are just trying to recapture the feeling that made them like to play in the first place. That your only choices are "self-education" and "ego-boost" tells me that you yourself have forgotten this fact. Does playing Lol feel any better than going to a 9 to 5 job for you?
IainG10 (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=ZaFishbone,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=3oMqnjfa,comment-id=00030001,timestamp=2019-06-10T08:07:46.321+0000) > > That is just BS. If you didn't win, there is no way for the game to judge that you actually did well. We've had strats like proxy singed and inting sion get wins, even tho score-wise, those strats would give the appearance that the dude sucked. We have supports who might get unimpressive scores but who can guarantee a win by carrying the adc until late game. Junglers who can win a game early with enough ganks, but once again miss out ion games and maybe do poorer late game. Winning is the only TRUE metric by which we can judge how skilled someone is. Then they need to get rid of variable LP changes, because if how well you played _this_ game shouldn't affect your Ranked change, then neither should how well you did _last_ game. And for shit like proxy Singed or Suicide Bulldozer Sion; you could always take into account minion and tower damage....
> [{quoted}](name=IainG10,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=3oMqnjfa,comment-id=000300010001,timestamp=2019-06-11T01:26:18.212+0000) > > Then they need to get rid of variable LP changes, because if how well you played _this_ game shouldn't affect your Ranked change, then neither should how well you did _last_ game. > > And for shit like proxy Singed or Suicide Bulldozer Sion; you could always take into account minion and tower damage.... Don't variable Lp changes depend mainly on the rank of the players in your current game? I don't remember anything about previous games counting,
Morbys (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=ZaFishbone,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=3oMqnjfa,comment-id=00030001,timestamp=2019-06-10T08:07:46.321+0000) > > That is just BS. If you didn't win, there is no way for the game to judge that you actually did well. We've had strats like proxy singed and inting sion get wins, even tho score-wise, those strats would give the appearance that the dude sucked. We have supports who might get unimpressive scores but who can guarantee a win by carrying the adc until late game. Junglers who can win a game early with enough ganks, but once again miss out ion games and maybe do poorer late game. Winning is the only TRUE metric by which we can judge how skilled someone is. It isn't BS and the examples you just made were toxic strats that should have never worked to begin with, people exploiting a champions ability that should never have been in the game to begin with, which is why they fixed the ability to do it with high success. Its still in the game but you get punished much more severely if you fall behind.
> [{quoted}](name=Morbys,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=3oMqnjfa,comment-id=000300010000,timestamp=2019-06-10T20:13:14.747+0000) > > It isn't BS and the examples you just made were toxic strats that should have never worked to begin with, people exploiting a champions ability that should never have been in the game to begin with, which is why they fixed the ability to do it with high success. Its still in the game but you get punished much more severely if you fall behind. Yep let's nerf minion farming and split-pushing, and only getting kills should help win games. At the same time, let's lower damage so that you can't kill enemies as fast. i see no inconsistencies with what ppl on the boards want here.
Kanzler (NA)
: Might want to send in a ticket.
> [{quoted}](name=Kanzler,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=Y1wBpLte,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-06-10T11:04:20.122+0000) > > Might want to send in a ticket. And get a permanent ban for it.
: [Player Advice]: Motivation is the Key
I don't treat my teammates as garbage. They still feed their asses off, botlane going 0/10 EASILY.
: I mean, this is the same system that wants you to participate in/take all of the kills in the game, but also afk farm and have 150 cs at 15 minutes (which are both mutually exclusive) on a jungler, *and also* have 0 deaths whatsoever just to get an S-. However, get 140 farm or die literally once and it's an A+... Yeah, I'd say the system makes zero sense {{sticker:zombie-nunu-bummed}} (if it wasn't obvious, this comment is full of hyperbole, but as someone who's been trying to get M7 on Evelynn for the last year+, it really feels like this)
> [{quoted}](name=That Shaman,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=1Oqz3YvK,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-06-10T04:52:35.070+0000) > > I mean, this is the same system that wants you to participate in/take all of the kills in the game, but also afk farm and have 150 cs at 15 minutes (which are both mutually exclusive) on a jungler, *and also* have 0 deaths whatsoever just to get an S-. However, get 140 farm or die literally once and it's an A+... Yeah, I'd say the system makes zero sense > {{sticker:zombie-nunu-bummed}} > > (if it wasn't obvious, this comment is full of hyperbole, but as someone who's been trying to get M7 on Evelynn for the last year+, it really feels like this) Play ranked a lot, then, once you've improved, come back to normals. That's what I did to get my last M7 token. If you won't even try to play ranked, don't be surprised if you never improve. Normal MMr matchmaking is too inconsistent to foster a good learning experience.
: when a b+ win gives you more points than a s+ defeat
If you didn't win, there is no way for the game to judge that you actually did well. We've had strats like proxy singed and inting sion get wins, even tho score-wise, those strats would give the appearance that the dude sucked. We have supports who might get unimpressive scores but who can guarantee a win by carrying the adc until late game. Junglers who can win a game early with enough ganks, but once again miss out ion games and maybe do poorer late game. Winning is the only TRUE metric by which we can judge how skilled someone is.
: How Qiyana's Lore (sort of) Saved Her Design And Steps in Perfecting It
I wish that the Lore team didn't constantly have to do damage control for the atrocious way champions are being characterized in-game these days. Seriously, there are SO MANY new characters and reworks these days who are so edgy and hard to listen to. I honestly can't stand the new Ezreal lines, makes him sound like such an a-hole. Do Riot games really think this is what people liked Ezreal's lore wanted?
: I opened the support ticket page only to see this
Ah I see a fellow EUNE player. Problems with house missions bugging out,like everyone else?
: Being flamed by High Elo players because of rank.
In my experience normals is a lot more chill than ranked. I mean even if I'm loosing I feel alright, and I just don't see the same amount of flame as I do in rank games.
: What do you guys think of smurfs?
Your choices are bad and you should feel bad.
: maybe not inflating ur mmr to ridiculous amounts after just few lucky games would help
> [{quoted}](name=Luther King Jr V,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=3oMqnjfa,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2019-06-10T08:08:02.911+0000) > > maybe not inflating ur mmr to ridiculous amounts after just few lucky games would help It really doesn't. I've very rarely had almost a dozen strait wins in a row before i finally lost, and there was no division skipping for me.
Morbys (NA)
: Its bad b/c no matter how well you do, a loss will net you the exact amount of lp loss that the garbage players you were carrying get. Or if you carried hard, still the same amount. If they can implement a scorecard for your performance, they can apply that to mmr. Thats how it should be, if you have an A+ or above on a losing team, you really shouldnt lose as much lp, same for winning, if you have an A+ or above, you should get more points b/c you clearly carried the game
> [{quoted}](name=Morbys,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=3oMqnjfa,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-06-10T05:01:39.187+0000) > > Its bad b/c no matter how well you do, a loss will net you the exact amount of lp loss that the garbage players you were carrying get. Or if you carried hard, still the same amount. If they can implement a scorecard for your performance, they can apply that to mmr. Thats how it should be, if you have an A+ or above on a losing team, you really shouldnt lose as much lp, same for winning, if you have an A+ or above, you should get more points b/c you clearly carried the game That is just BS. If you didn't win, there is no way for the game to judge that you actually did well. We've had strats like proxy singed and inting sion get wins, even tho score-wise, those strats would give the appearance that the dude sucked. We have supports who might get unimpressive scores but who can guarantee a win by carrying the adc until late game. Junglers who can win a game early with enough ganks, but once again miss out ion games and maybe do poorer late game. Winning is the only TRUE metric by which we can judge how skilled someone is.
: i think the reason why matchmaking sucks is because it doesn't account for inconsistent performance
There is literally no way to account for this. people need to understand that.
: > [{quoted}](name=ZaFishbone,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=M5qk1VhU,comment-id=000400000001,timestamp=2019-06-07T07:32:29.971+0000) > > 1. If someone is willing to pay 1$ a month to play LoL, they are kind of a dumb ass. But I suppose that they only ever need 1 account active at a time, so some of those dumb asses would be willing to play. > 2. Same as the above if they are willing to pay a few euros per new account. Once again, I agree that this does kinda undermine my idea. > 3. Hmm, I'm not really knowledgeable of how phone companies reuse old phone numbers. > 4. 13yos shouldn't be playing LoL > 5 Who the F uses a business phone for a crappy online game? (1. 2.) > Lots of smurfs are actually buying leveled accounts for a few euros when they get banned so ... (4.) They are authorized to play LoL, read the TOS it starts at 13 (5.) So what ? It's just a number
> [{quoted}](name=Starcraft243ver,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=M5qk1VhU,comment-id=0004000000010000,timestamp=2019-06-07T08:25:53.850+0000) > > (1. 2.) > Lots of smurfs are actually buying leveled accounts for a few euros when they get banned so ... > (4.) They are authorized to play LoL, read the TOS it starts at 13 > (5.) So what ? It's just a number That ppl are willing to spend money constantly just because they can't keep calm in-game is just sad.
: Riots champ design is incredibly dull now
The irony ism that back when Riot was releasing champs every 2 weeks, directly recreating champs from Dota, ripping off so many other media, and using every fantasy cliche ever, they had more creative champions, because at the rate they were releasing them they didn't give an F if just one champ was too edgy or wasn't that successful. Now Riot stresses over every champ release for months, each one HAS to be a success, and so they try to pander to the largest com unities within their playerbase.
: Inting Player, Nunu ADC, Said he wants to get demoted to Iron IV
In my mentality, if you complain about someone inting your game on these boards, be prepared to be downvoted! {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}}
: since a grown up never does this stuff i guess hes just a kid. so if even he could find u and knock ur door. just open the door and beat his ass. lol
> [{quoted}](name=jng dif victim,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=FIqJTvdp,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2019-06-06T08:38:54.162+0000) > > since a grown up never does this stuff PHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH, oh my god, how naive can you be?
: Please, for the love of Nagakabouros, give TB Skyen a fat female champion
Fat ppl who try to play hero usually die of diabetes before accomplishing anything noteworthy. As for {{champion:79}}, I'm pretty sure he has a beer belly, and it wouldn't do to reuse the idea. And should we really be asking Rito to pander to some annoying SJW youtuber?
: Qiyana Champion Teaser, and A Mini Rant (League of Legends)
Ranting before we even know anything about her kit. Pathetic.
: 1. There are offers for phone numbers for 1€/month (in my country at least, but i think it exists in all EU) 2. You can buy ready to use low cost expandable cellphones with brand new numbers for a few euros as well. 3. You get a phone number who belonged to someone else before who already used it with his account, what do you do ? 4. You are a 13yo and you want to play league but your parents wont buy you a cellphone before you are 15 (well, to be honnest if we could get rid of the 13yo, it's fine for me.) 5. A lot of people have a personnal phone AND a business/corporate phone I could expand this list but i think you get the point. Put the phone number requirement in place and i'll still have 3 accounts.
> [{quoted}](name=Starcraft243ver,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=M5qk1VhU,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2019-06-06T08:56:16.928+0000) > > 1. There are offers for phone numbers for 1€/month (in my country at least, but i think it exists in all EU) > 2. You can buy ready to use low cost expandable cellphones with brand new numbers for a few euros as well. > 3. You get a phone number who belonged to someone else before who already used it with his account, what do you do ? > 4. You are a 13yo and you want to play league but your parents wont buy you a cellphone before you are 15 (well, to be honnest if we could get rid of the 13yo, it's fine for me.) > 5. A lot of people have a personnal phone AND a business/corporate phone > > I could expand this list but i think you get the point. Put the phone number requirement in place and i'll still have 3 accounts. 1. If someone is willing to pay 1$ a month to play LoL, they are kind of a dumb ass. But I suppose that they only ever need 1 account active at a time, so some of those dumb asses would be willing to play. 2. Same as the above if they are willing to pay a few euros per new account. Once again, I agree that this does kinda undermine my idea. 3. Hmm, I'm not really knowledgeable of how phone companies reuse old phone numbers. 4. 13yos shouldn't be playing LoL 5 Who the F uses a business phone for a crappy online game?
: Did Riot ever consider not to allow creating of second account??
To all the people saying there are no methods of enforcing this, there actually are some that could partially work. Requiring a new account to need a phone number attached to it would mean that making new accounts continuously would become more and more of a headache the more it happened. And to the OP, Riot has stated that they've considered it, but were actually against it. Reasons why should be pretty obvious. They'd quickly loose a considerable amount of their player base, not to mention all the businesses involved in leveling new accounts to 30.
: Because he is popular and probably sells skins.
> [{quoted}](name=Clockwork Mouse,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=yU5k25O5,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-06-06T06:16:16.840+0000) > > Because he is popular and probably sells skins. Which is in no small part due to Faker making LoL history while playing zed.
: Poor Rhaast
Don't worry, going by an analytical study of player choices in-game, Rhaast is almost guaranteed to poses Kayn fully.
: > [{quoted}](name=ZaFishbone,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=JAEW1pGm,comment-id=0002000000000001000000000000,timestamp=2019-06-05T12:21:32.965+0000) > > What on earth made you start with the whole "not to be the guy beating your gf" bit? Did you completely miss out on what we were talking about? I gave the "standing around while someone beats ur gf" question as an example. The real question was: you said that being peaceful always leads to better results, does that even apply when someone is getting hurt in front of you RIGHT THEN AND THERE? Pls stop going of topic or on tangents, just answer that question. "ZaFishbone (EUNE) - about 4 hours ago The strongest thing depends entirely on the situation you are in. If some lone guy is beating up your girlfriend in front of you, I doubt the strongest things are calm and self-control." That was not a question. And in my previous statement I said defending a helpless person does not also mean you are not a pacifist. You can also approach fights that you feel you must fight in a calm and collected manner with self-control, as seen by Robert Downey Jr in the Sherlock Holmes movie. That means just use your brain first. So in a way, I did answer the question you did not ask. Also the post you were referring to was this: "Anyhow, I think the strongest thing is calm, self-control. It'll get you further in life than being impulsive will." That just means don't be a dick, i.e. Don't be the dude beating on people's girlfriends. [Cobra Kai Season 2 Spoilers Ahead] --------------------------------------------------------------------- And you may think that Miguel made the wrong choice to not end that fight with Robby when he had the chance, otherwise he wouldn't have gotten his back broken. But Robby actually broke that dude's back and will forever be known as the dude that took it too far. But to you, it seems you would find Miguel weak because he didn't "finish him" and be known as the guy that took it too far himself. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [End Spoilers] Please respond soon, as I look forward to our further discussion of us trying to figure out what the other person really means.
> [{quoted}](name=EyesOfTheFox,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=JAEW1pGm,comment-id=00020000000000010000000000000000,timestamp=2019-06-05T12:29:00.540+0000) > > "ZaFishbone (EUNE) - about 4 hours ago > > The strongest thing depends entirely on the situation you are in. If some lone guy is beating up your girlfriend in front of you, I doubt the strongest things are calm and self-control." > > That was not a question. And in my previous statement I said defending a helpless person does not also mean you are not a pacifist. You can also approach fights that you feel you must fight in a calm and collected manner with self-control, as seen by Robert Downey Jr in the Sherlock Holmes movie. That means just use your brain first. So in a way, I did answer the question you did not ask. > > Also the post you were referring to was this: > > "Anyhow, I think the strongest thing is calm, self-control. It'll get you further in life than being impulsive will." > > That just means don't be a dick, i.e. Don't be the dude beating on people's girlfriends. > > [Cobra Kai Season 2 Spoilers Ahead] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > And you may think that Miguel made the wrong choice to not end that fight with Robby when he had the chance, otherwise he wouldn't have gotten his back broken. But Robby actually broke that dude's back and will forever be known as the dude that took it too far. But to you, it seems you would find Miguel weak because he didn't "finish him" and be known as the guy that took it too far himself. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > [End Spoilers] > > Please respond soon, as I look forward to our further discussion of us trying to figure out what the other person really means. If you're capable of being calm and self controlled when someone is hitting your girlfriend, I would question how much you really cared for her. Sometimes getting angry and ruled by emotions is part of being a human with a healthy mentality.
: > [{quoted}](name=ZaFishbone,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=JAEW1pGm,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2019-06-05T08:02:39.273+0000) > > The strongest thing depends entirely on the situation you are in. If some lone guy is beating up your girlfriend in front of you, I doubt the strongest things are calm and self-control. If you are able to compare playing a videogame with someone beating your girlfriend then i have some really bad news for you, buddy...
> [{quoted}](name=Sebastit7d,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=JAEW1pGm,comment-id=0002000000000002,timestamp=2019-06-05T13:22:06.319+0000) > > If you are able to compare playing a videogame with someone beating your girlfriend then i have some really bad news for you, buddy... When did I make such a comparison? Did you see the comment I was responding to? It was talking about society at large, and aggressive vs peaceful attitudes in general, not just video games.
: Positvity tilts me even more. Constant ass kissing is not any kind of "support" for me
> [{quoted}](name=R107 Games,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=EWkrIkPJ,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-06-04T14:51:37.035+0000) > > Constant ass kissing Why are you sad when someone kisses you?
: > [{quoted}](name=ZaFishbone,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=JAEW1pGm,comment-id=00020000000000010000,timestamp=2019-06-05T11:23:02.241+0000) > > So standing around when someone else is doing it is just fine? "sorry honey, can't help you, I'm a pacifist, you see" Defending a helpless person does not mean you are not a pacifist. Pacifists don't go around looking for fights. They don't feel the need to engage in pointless fights either. You are trying to relate someone in real life trauma to some shit someone said on a computer. The two are NOT the same. Jesus was a pacifist but even he flipped some tables and yelled at some Romans once (in defense of his religion because he was angry at the corruption in the Church in Rome at the time). Fighting someone with words on the internet because they bruised your ego, does not make you strong. It actually proves how weak you are. And again...the point is, to not be the person beating on your girlfriend in the first place. Think about this, if that dude actually believed he was supposed to be the person that doesn't beat on women, he wouldn't have started beating her up, and we wouldn't even be having this conversation. You're trying to relate the defending of someone else that is in a helpless situation to the defending yourself in an online video game chat. One is a selfless act, the other is a selfish act.
> [{quoted}](name=EyesOfTheFox,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=JAEW1pGm,comment-id=000200000000000100000000,timestamp=2019-06-05T11:56:02.727+0000) > > Defending a helpless person does not mean you are not a pacifist. Pacifists don't go around looking for fights. They don't feel the need to engage in pointless fights either. You are trying to relate someone in real life trauma to some shit someone said on a computer. The two are NOT the same. Jesus was a pacifist but even he flipped some tables and yelled at some Romans once (in defense of his religion because he was angry at the corruption in the Church in Rome at the time). > > Fighting someone with words on the internet because they bruised your ego, does not make you strong. It actually proves how weak you are. > > And again...the point is, to not be the person beating on your girlfriend in the first place. Think about this, if that dude actually believed he was supposed to be the person that doesn't beat on women, he wouldn't have started beating her up, and we wouldn't even be having this conversation. You're trying to relate the defending of someone else that is in a helpless situation to the defending yourself in an online video game chat. One is a selfless act, the other is a selfish act. What on earth made you start with the whole "not to be the guy beating your gf" bit? Did you completely miss out on what we were talking about? I gave the "standing around while someone beats ur gf" question as an example. The real question was: you said that being peaceful always leads to better results, does that even apply when someone is getting hurt in front of you RIGHT THEN AND THERE? Pls stop going of topic or on tangents, just answer that question.
: > [{quoted}](name=ZaFishbone,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=JAEW1pGm,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2019-06-05T08:02:39.273+0000) > > The strongest thing depends entirely on the situation you are in. If some lone guy is beating up your girlfriend in front of you, I doubt the strongest things are calm and self-control. I think the point is to not be the guy beating up your girlfriend.
> [{quoted}](name=EyesOfTheFox,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=JAEW1pGm,comment-id=0002000000000001,timestamp=2019-06-05T09:31:12.802+0000) > > I think the point is to not be the guy beating up your girlfriend. So standing around when someone else is doing it is just fine? "sorry honey, can't help you, I'm a pacifist, you see"
: Can we allow losing bot to make comebacks already? Every game is a coin flip
There's no proof here that anybody on your team played well enough to deserve a comeback. QQ more.
: As someone who plays bot, I would love a comeback mechanic of some kind... Sometimes losing lane is just you got four man tower dived because you're not in a good match up. Like you're playing Tristana/Janna and are gonna be something amazing late game but right now, in laning phase, you're facing a Draven/Leona and there's only so much you can do except try not to die. And then it never fails that they shove the wave under turret and you're getting dove and have lost your turret.
> [{quoted}](name=OtterlyLost,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=nVMEaWE0,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-06-04T19:13:25.224+0000) > > As someone who plays bot, I would love a comeback mechanic of some kind... Sometimes losing lane is just you got four man tower dived because you're not in a good match up. Like you're playing Tristana/Janna and are gonna be something amazing late game but right now, in laning phase, you're facing a Draven/Leona and there's only so much you can do except try not to die. And then it never fails that they shove the wave under turret and you're getting dove and have lost your turret. If the recent MSI hasn't taught everyone that "lategame scaling" just doesn't win games anymore, there's no hope for ppl like you.
: > [{quoted}](name=SovereignMammal,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=JAEW1pGm,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-06-05T04:23:19.771+0000) > > Don't apologize. > Apologizing has bred the weak nanny state we now live in. It'd be pretty funny to see a society where no one makes amends for aggression bc they think it makes them look stronger. Anyhow, I think the strongest thing is calm, self-control. It'll get you further in life than being impulsive will.
> [{quoted}](name=Schoenberg,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=JAEW1pGm,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-06-05T05:08:54.951+0000) > > It'd be pretty funny to see a society where no one makes amends for aggression bc they think it makes them look stronger. > > Anyhow, I think the strongest thing is calm, self-control. It'll get you further in life than being impulsive will. The strongest thing depends entirely on the situation you are in. If some lone guy is beating up your girlfriend in front of you, I doubt the strongest things are calm and self-control.
: I was 80lp how is that loss protection im not deranking?
> [{quoted}](name=StaySaltyBaby,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=1vUYQEEq,comment-id=000000010000,timestamp=2019-05-31T19:06:02.146+0000) > > I was 80lp how is that loss protection im not deranking? Did you seriously downvote me because I was trying to explain how loss protection works?
: Now all that's left is for {{champion:6}} to say here kitty kitty kitty when he pulls yuumi with his R (just like nidalee)
> [{quoted}](name=Tahminatrix ,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=c73u8FBK,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-06-03T18:51:42.476+0000) > > Now all that's left is for {{champion:6}} to say here kitty kitty kitty when he pulls yuumi with his R (just like nidalee) And when he pulls Annie in he should say: "Hey little girl, want some candy?"
: I cracked up when she said she was going to go play HoN. Honestly HoN could have been better but had a crappier marketing settup.
> [{quoted}](name=AnotherFeeder,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=9MkzWupA,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-05-31T05:10:35.775+0000) > > I cracked up when she said she was going to go play HoN. > > Honestly HoN could have been better but had a crappier marketing settup. SHUNN THE HERETIC! SHUNN!!!! **SHUNNNN!!!!!!**
: ... Oh my fucking god.
> [{quoted}](name=4 Step Cadence,realm=NA,application-id=Ir7ZrJjF,discussion-id=VMKRJHlF,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-05-31T01:23:28.907+0000) > > ... Oh my fucking god. I really don't think Aurelain Sol does a lot of fucking.
: My Suggestion for a Shaco Rework (10-year Shaco main)
So cute that you think Riot actually cares one bit about the opinions of a 10 year Shaco main.
: I like trains
> [{quoted}](name=Break their rank,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=AnG6sTRn,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-05-30T22:45:24.397+0000) > > I like trains Yes, yes you do!
: oh so it doesnt immeditally remove lp just makes u gain less for 1 win? and ye i did dodge before it but i usually get like 15-18lp
> [{quoted}](name=StaySaltyBaby,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=1vUYQEEq,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-05-31T07:46:52.127+0000) > > oh so it doesnt immeditally remove lp just makes u gain less for 1 win? and ye i did dodge before it but i usually get like 15-18lp No, that's not it. I already answered what is wrong.
usul1202 (NA)
: Did you dodge before that game? Dodges cost lp (-3 for the first) and that cost is shown on your next gain or loss I believe.
> [{quoted}](name=usul1202,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=1vUYQEEq,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-05-31T07:26:47.123+0000) > > Did you dodge before that game? Dodges cost lp (-3 for the first) and that cost is shown on your next gain or loss I believe. Nope. It was loss protection game, which halves LP gain. You were probably playing right when the hotfix was applied.
: You don't have the right to complain about your champ unless you are Challenger. There is something I realised - there are no shit champions, only shit players
> [{quoted}](name=Flavi Kang,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=EPw0Gzy0,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2019-05-30T22:18:03.624+0000) > > You don't have the right to complain about your champ unless you are Challenger. There is something I realised - there are no shit champions, only shit players And we've got one such player right here.
DeusVult (NA)
: Morde is going to have 69 AD at level 1
{{champion:82}} "You only need to lick once, fool!"
: Everyone hates ez and lux being the focus my dude. It truly sucks to see them get those skin lines EPECIALLY when ezrial got a legendary skin. He already has an ULTIMATE skin like LUX for cryin out loud.
> [{quoted}](name=Whyskered Wyrm,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=IJ1uW19x,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-05-31T01:25:18.405+0000) > > Everyone hates ez and lux being the focus my dude. It truly sucks to see them get those skin lines EPECIALLY when ezrial got a legendary skin. He already has an ULTIMATE skin like LUX for cryin out loud. If everyone hated them they wouldn't be making Riot so much money.
TheGrot (NA)
: It really wouldn't be. In mid lane you pretty much never use hammer form to mana regen from a wave because of how vulnerable it makes you to ganks and free poke. Also because it's a shorter lane. Top lane you see it get put into use a lot more, which is why the change would be much more of a top lane nerf than a mid lane nerf. Really it just punishes Jayce players a lot harder for not being able to reliably land EQ. If you miss that in top lane, you cant just afk farm a wave to get half of the mana cost refunded.
> [{quoted}](name=TheGrot,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=bVN3ZVEz,comment-id=000f000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-30T19:24:14.054+0000) > > It really wouldn't be. In mid lane you pretty much never use hammer form to mana regen from a wave because of how vulnerable it makes you to ganks and free poke. Also because it's a shorter lane. Top lane you see it get put into use a lot more, which is why the change would be much more of a top lane nerf than a mid lane nerf. Really it just punishes Jayce players a lot harder for not being able to reliably land EQ. If you miss that in top lane, you cant just afk farm a wave to get half of the mana cost refunded. Not what I've heard. Also I main Diana, who needs 3 melee attacks to regain mana, and she still relies HEAVILY on this feature in mid. It's not impossible to get an attack in on the minions here and there, even against a mage.
Show more

ZaFishbone

Level 49 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion