Vexilus (NA)
: The Viability of a 1 Summoner Spell limit and the Improvement of Summoner spells
About {{summoner:11}} you forget, that being able to buy a jungle item is tied to having smite as summoner. Why it is tied? - because jungle items were stronger than "regular" items - even that strong, that laners took smite to be able to use the jungle item. So removing smite completely and giving everyone easy access to the jungle item agains is kind of a bad idea.
: It isn't difficult to cheat the system and not get filled. Someone dodges or a game isn't accepted and I reset the queue. But I shouldn't have to. As for how you don't believe it. During my time with draft pick, jungle was the second least contested role (in some cases supp was more contested). And was also the role many were least comfortable with filling if support vs jg were their options. At that point annie, morgana, fiddle, nid and zyra were pickable hyper carry supports so many didn't really object to it. As they'd simply "support" if you catch my drift. As for complaining about playing support. I don't mind support at all. I just prefer to do it from the jungle. Only my support jg champ pool is less than ideal atm due to the current jungle state/overall meta. If I had to choose a position to never play, it'd be adc followed by mid/sup/top/jg (sup and top r basically equal). I'm instead voicing for the games in which people r autofilled way out of their comfort zone. If you're autofilled from jg to top/sup there are plenty of champs that have similar styles and spells to help last hit. But chuck a supp/jg into adc against an adc main and you're in for a world of hurt. Add to that the cases where players are filled into someone elses pref and vice versa and you have a broken system. (I have indeed had a top filled to adc and an adc filled to top in the same game and on the same team) When draft was around I could play every role decently. But everyone had to be able to play every role decently, not just me. That was the expectation. Now you expect to main 2 roles and after a year without 3 other roles I adjusted as such. It simply isn't time efficient to work at being effective in every position just in case you get auto filled. If I were to remake the system I'd make it complex with 6 possible preferences one of which being fill. You could opt out of one role only if you chose to fill. With 4-5 prefences it raises the bar on everyone to play and potentially decreases queue times as there'd be no such thing as auto fill. If 5 people had supp last pref it would stick someone there based on winrate when placed there (they'd be most comfortable there theoretically)
> With 4-5 prefences it raises the bar on everyone to play and potentially decreases queue times as there'd be no such thing as auto fill. > If 5 people had supp last pref it would stick someone there based on winrate when placed there (they'd be most comfortable there theoretically) Resulting in support trying to see another lane to be autofilled to support again? :-D
: So we are fucking ap again?
: Alright, now EVERY mid laner can have Malzahar's passive on an item
: Alright, now EVERY mid laner can have Malzahar's passive on an item
well first abbysal doesn't grant ap any more (according to surrender@20) second .. banshees allready has that passive - without the skaling ... third .. its a testing system .. we also don't get Jinx criting spell even it was on the pbe
: Alright, now EVERY mid laner can have Malzahar's passive on an item
> [{quoted}](name=Malicious Metal,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=dUTf6A5h,comment-id=,timestamp=2017-04-07T09:07:43.196+0000) > > Really? > Feels like a huge slap in the face for what little Malzahar fans still remain. > > Can we get some actual insight on Riot's stance on Malzahar's state? refering to?
: I don't think you read what I wrote. The system knows it is negative. It doesn't punish every time it sees it.
> [{quoted}](name=Riot Tantram,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=EnunvHEJ,comment-id=000200010000,timestamp=2017-04-05T22:56:03.337+0000) > > I don't think you read what I wrote. > > The system knows it is negative. It doesn't punish every time it sees it. If I have an {{champion:81}} in my team ... is there a save way to adress him with ez or @ez without being punished? i.e. as support asking him how confident he is with the matchup ...
: Some Things About Support
Hi I'm also manly playing support. Some thoughts about it. > [{quoted}](name=TricolorStar,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=4vr1TKcR,comment-id=,timestamp=2017-04-04T14:39:24.875+0000) > > **Mages in the Botlane:** Yes right ... Damage > Sustain. Good example is the Taric rework .. while you were able to outsustane virtually any damage on laning phase with heal max with the old Taric, the new Taric just can't because of the stack mechanic .. yes heal and shield are really strong on teamfights but laningphase is almost only about landing stun and deal damage. > [{quoted}](name=TricolorStar,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=4vr1TKcR,comment-id=,timestamp=2017-04-04T14:39:24.875+0000) > > **Support Itemization:** Well ... support items should emphasize support abilities ... yes {{item:3107}} grants +10% shield and heal bonus but .. the real big effect is about the activ heal, which not even has a reduced effect on successive use like the heal summoner spell. The problem about the item I see is, that everyone can buy and use it effecively (greetings {{champion:427}} with {{item:3107}} first rush). I think the active ability should be changed ... something like .. 1. on activation the nearest 2 allies are also affected from heal/shield -> additional range or targets .. working with ablities or other active items (i.e. {{item:3401}} ) 2. on activation then next heal/shield gains double value and duration. The intention is not, to distroy the item but to make it only work on supports or someone who is realy dedicating to being supportive. I.E. if i pick Leona as support who has neither heal nor shield abilities the combination of {{item:3401}} is till strong but the "hey i am super behind top lane {{champion:68}} - i'll buy {{item:3107}} for the additional heal" .. well that guy shouldn't have a such great impact with the active ability.
dominusx (EUNE)
: you dont get banned. the skin just gets refunded.
also don't think you get banned - because you didn't do anything wrong.
: [Quick Gameplay Thoughts: March 14](http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/developer-corner/ppkM0ZAu-quick-gameplay-thoughts-march-14), "Changes to struggling junglers", last line in the paragraph.
Thanks - missed thad.
: They ll change Voli later on. Meddler Quote: [..] Volibear a possibility in 7.7 or later, though nothing proven good yet.
reference of quote?
: Not really much for contention here. >Once you hit the quota or final flagged game, you are immediately banned within minutes. Bans are instantly done within minutes of the flagged/reported game. There is no way this is done manually unless Rioters have people 24/7 around the clock on alert to watch for people to get banned. I've been banned twice and punished tons of times, so I know. Your last final bad game before punishment = punishment within minutes. >Riot looks at your history Riot says in its reports on you that "due to a history of negative behavior". How can they know there's a history if they don't look? Furthermore, if you challenge it through support tickets, they will look at your history to confirm the ban or lift it. >Riot also does not wipe false or wrong reports from the record, when a false report should be immediately discounted and removed, as should the punishment. 3) Riot is not clear on what negative attitude or verbal abuse means and most people don't know the difference and don't really care, but yet, every player can report someone for 3 categories. Riot also does not specify whether you were banned for negative or verbal when you get banned, as they just call it toxic behavior. This means that verbal and negative reports stack together. People don't know what each category means or don't care. Riot does not count categories separately, they stack them together. If Riot can't tell me clearly if I was banned for verbal or negative, how can a player who doesn't care?
you are repeating what you think they do .. you have any PROVE of that? Of course you aren't treaded because of a single game .. being toxic means being toxic frequently ... to prove that, they have to do a history. I am asking for a proof that riot isn'T wiping false reports. And i am asking for a proof that fals reports can get you banned.
: False reports can get you banned. It goes like this: 1) Most League players would be banned under the current low tolerance of the behavior system where words like retard can get you banned. I see stuff like "ez", "noob" and insults every game. This all breaks the behavior rules. 2) Riot goes through your history to justify bans. Since in #1, everyone says stuff that can get you banned, it gives Riot a lot of stuff to work with and look at when justifying bans. We don't know how far Riot goes back through people's chat histories or if there are any rules in place. 3) Riot is not clear on what negative attitude or verbal abuse means and most people don't know the difference and don't really care, but yet, every player can report someone for 3 categories. Riot also does not specify whether you were banned for negative or verbal when you get banned, as they just call it toxic behavior. This means that verbal and negative reports stack together. People don't know what each category means or don't care. Riot does not count categories separately, they stack them together. 4) People are not regularly banned or punished for false reporting. Look around here. The last bans for false reports are from 2012-2013. 5) False reports can get you banned. This is what happens. The reporter chooses multiple categories to report you, whether its legit or not. Once you hit the quota or final flagged game, you are immediately banned within minutes. If the report turns out to be a bogus report, Riot looks at your history and since everyone says stuff that could get them banned, they can easily find evidence proving that you engage in negative behavior and deserve to be banned. Riot also does not wipe false or wrong reports from the record, when a false report should be immediately discounted and removed, as should the punishment. What should happen: False report > Punishment reversed, report not counted and bogus reporter punished What actually happens: False report > Riot goes through your history for an unknown amount of games to justify your ban. If the report turns out to be bogus, it is not overturned due to "a history of toxic behavior"
> [{quoted}](name=Great Muta,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=9OR36u0E,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2017-03-13T14:44:30.822+0000) > False reports can get you banned. This is what happens. The reporter chooses multiple categories to report you, whether its legit or not. Once you hit the quota or final flagged game, you are immediately banned within minutes. If the report turns out to be a bogus report, Riot looks at your history and since everyone says stuff that could get them banned, they can easily find evidence proving that you engage in negative behavior and deserve to be banned. Riot also does not wipe false or wrong reports from the record, when a false report should be immediately discounted and removed, as should the punishment. Any proove of that?
: The problem is when you have Riot encouraging people to report as the answer to every problem and when you have players taking part in revenge reporting, tit for tat reporting, group reporting, reporting solely to get people in trouble and fake reporting, people let reports fly like auto attacks. And why not? People don't get punished for false reporting(please show me cases of people being punished solely for false reports) and sending out a report is free.
reports with no proof will be droped .. being reported doesn't lead to be treaded if you didn't do anything wrong.
: Length between reports?
Wouldn't be better to work on permanently not being reasonably reported instead of making the gap "long enough"?
Mig89 (NA)
: No. Before auto fill was a thing it was pick order
wich was unfair too because the last member was forced to play support 99% of the time
Tehery (NA)
: Let the player check mark the auto fill yes or no. If a no then they have long Q times and will never be put in to a game with an auto fill player or be autofilled that is up to the player to pick. Q time vs Auto fill. You must choose. But choose wisely, for as the true Grail will bring you life, the false Grail will take it from you.
Before autofill you had the choice to pick first lane and do second as any lane ... still queue times from about 20 minutes ...
: Autofill
you know autofill was introduced to reduce queue times from 20 minutes to about 3?
: What needs to happen with autofill
Funny ... everyone complained about the long queue times ... then forced fill was introduced to reduce queue time .. now everyone complains about being auto.filled ...
: Finding my lane
Hey I digged out one of my older posts ... I know there is outdated stuff but maybe it still helps http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/ENEGdmpR-advice-one-what-champion-to-main-topmid?comment=0002 for actuall champ classifications see here http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/de/c/developer-corner/3A5uuBw7-champion-subclass-list
: Would smite proc Relic shield?
smite support incoming after exhaust nerf :-D
: False Permanent Ban
you got banned .. you got an email with explanation ... post the mail here?
Pwntang (NA)
: Hacked, Banned -- and told there's no evidence so I'm out of luck?
Sorry but .. account seccurity is your charge .... riot won't unban.
: > [{quoted}](name=Anraton,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=RcoZ0zKR,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-04-08T08:14:57.206+0000) > > PrototypeBS2: reported > PrototypeBS2: enjoy 14 day ban > > PrototypeBS2: or id report u > > it is called harassment yea dude amumu came into the game and said fuck you vi fuck you vi over and over then I said back to him "reported enjoy 14 day ban" how is that harassment he was being toxic towards me..
doesn't matter what everyone else is doing... your chat log was judged here ... and you were sentenced
: I don't get it..
PrototypeBS2: reported PrototypeBS2: enjoy 14 day ban PrototypeBS2: or id report u it is called harassment
Annoxis (EUW)
: Most of the time it will be fired from two people.
try hit lucian or ez with it .. good luck
: > [{quoted}](name=Anraton,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=hcII79R5,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-04-06T09:23:53.585+0000) > > his passiv is a buff actually .... taric started with 25.9 armor and had a 20% armor scaling - for 1 attack. now he has 15 +5/level + a 15% bonus armor scaling -> before it was ~ 12 at lvl 1 now it is 20 for 2 hits > > Q Changed massiv - hit is now a charge ability with 15 sec recharge time per charge and a aoe healing that can be doubled with his W > > W ... passive armor is buffed but you loose the aura buff ... don't like the damage + armor shred exchange to a shield. > > E .. you do a 1 second selfstun and at lvl 1 it is a 0,75 sec stun ... funny stuff .. you need lvl 3 for 1.25 sec stun to be useable as gapcloser - even it is a damage buff > > Ult .. well its an aoe kayle ult .. no damage any more ... damage is more protective and passiv as he was before .... Actually, I think his W gives gives his ally that he's linked with the buff as well. Not too sure though. They need to clarify.
right the ally is getting the armor bonus, but the other 3 members of the team not.
Annoxis (EUW)
: E doesn't immobilize you.
sorry missread the update ... still 1 sec delay will be hard to hit
PanDorfa (EUNE)
: taric rework - for gods sake dont do this
his passiv is a buff actually .... taric started with 25.9 armor and had a 20% armor scaling - for 1 attack. now he has 15 +5/level + a 15% bonus armor scaling -> before it was ~ 12 at lvl 1 now it is 20 for 2 hits Q Changed massiv - hit is now a charge ability with 15 sec recharge time per charge and a aoe healing that can be doubled with his W W ... passive armor is buffed but you loose the aura buff ... don't like the damage + armor shred exchange to a shield. E .. you do a 1 second selfstun and at lvl 1 it is a 0,75 sec stun ... funny stuff .. you need lvl 3 for 1.25 sec stun to be useable as gapcloser - even it is a damage buff Ult .. well its an aoe kayle ult .. no damage any more ... damage is more protective and passiv as he was before ....
VayneEUNE (EUNE)
: Chat Ban
well .. only because you did the punishment games, you aren't automattically "reformed" ... how exactly it is working that you show yourself as reformed is unknown and riot won't answer the question.
: Targeted, meaning point and click (khazix q, malz e) not aimed skillshots.
why not just combine fastcast and "target champions only"?
SnowFall (NA)
: Is there anywhere I can submit my suggestions so it would be garenteed to be reviewed by Riot?
hm .. http://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/legal/termsofuse IV C .. Riot Games values your feedback on its services and products, but please do not submit any creative ideas, suggestions or materials. Neither Riot Games nor any of its employees and/or contractors accept or consider unsolicited ideas, original creative artwork or other works, including, without limitation, ideas or suggestions for new or improved games or technologies, game or product enhancements, marketing plans or names for new games (collectively “Unsolicited Ideas”).
: We have an AA click hotkey, why not for targeted abilities?
soulds like you are searching fastcast? EDIT: how you want to handle skillshits / not targeted skills .. like morgana e, lux e etc?
: Leona's passive
sorry no offense but .. feels like toe 100.000 time i read this suggesiton.
: thank you. And its not only that its them doing bad i understand people have bad games. i rarely am calling people bad simply because they make a mistake or 2. Its the people that simply refuse to listen to logic and reason, ignore the team, troll (in this case cho'gath mid becasue seriously have you even played against that) making the game not enjoyable in the first place. i get it, its a game. but the simple fact is that not everyone plays games to just hang around at. a lot of the league of legends community is competitve like me and when someone on you're team is feeding 0/16 and refusing to co-operate and communicate, im pretty sure i could do a lot worse then call them bad.
Still, raging at somone and telling him he is bad won't make him better .. and be honest ... nothing in your log was even close to being constructive ...
: New round of "Did you know"
> [{quoted}](name=CrazedPorcupine,realm=NA,application-id=Ir7ZrJjF,discussion-id=J1pAtrX7,comment-id=,timestamp=2016-03-31T08:20:49.090+0000) > > So, I really enjoy tiny tidbits of "Did you know" about champions, fun facts, interesting mechanical tidbits, even jokes are all good here. > > I'll start us off > > "Did you know: The "mark" inflicted when you become Kindred's target is actually coded as a buff? If it were coded as a debuff, then you'd be able to QSS/Mercurial. Riot intentionally coded Kindred's mark to be a buff to bypass this issue." Is that also true for Garens vilian mark?
: no it seriously isnt. calling someone bad isnt close to harassment. google the definition of harassment genius
Harassment (/həˈræsmənt/ or /ˈhærəsmənt/) covers a wide range of behaviours of an offensive nature. It is commonly understood as behaviour which disturbs or upsets, and it is characteristically repetitive. In the legal sense, it is behaviour which appears to be disturbing or threatening. Sexual harassment refers to persistent and unwanted sexual advances, typically in the workplace, where the consequences of refusing are potentially very disadvantageous to the victim. reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harassment telling someone he is garbage IS disturbing telling someone he is bronze 5 CAN also be disturbing telling someone he is not allowed to talk is disrepective and disturbing -> in my opinion, you deserve the ban.
: Game 1 KRYPTECDEMISE3: fuck my life its cho'garth KRYPTECDEMISE3: rip mid KRYPTECDEMISE3: hecarim start blue or red? KRYPTECDEMISE3: waiting to ward it KRYPTECDEMISE3: invading when he gets to blue KRYPTECDEMISE3: hec started red KRYPTECDEMISE3: hec recalled after red KRYPTECDEMISE3: he isnt at blue yet KRYPTECDEMISE3: where tf is he KRYPTECDEMISE3: he got blue KRYPTECDEMISE3: wtf KRYPTECDEMISE3: f this KRYPTECDEMISE3: people who play cho'garth mid are litteral garbage KRYPTECDEMISE3: i fucking hate this KRYPTECDEMISE3: its a cho'garth who is litterally broken in mid KRYPTECDEMISE3: and you're playing cho zed is not even close to broken KRYPTECDEMISE3: if you actually think zed is broken KRYPTECDEMISE3: you're bronze 5 KRYPTECDEMISE3: better then you obviously KRYPTECDEMISE3: you play cho mid KRYPTECDEMISE3: cho > infinit sustain KRYPTECDEMISE3: aoe poke KRYPTECDEMISE3: silence KRYPTECDEMISE3: 1k ult damage KRYPTECDEMISE3: cho garth may as well not either KRYPTECDEMISE3: his passive regens it KRYPTECDEMISE3: someone else is goibng to have to carry KRYPTECDEMISE3: cho mid is worse then teemo KRYPTECDEMISE3: impossible to poke he has unlited sustain on passive KRYPTECDEMISE3: like i said broken trash KRYPTECDEMISE3: its worse then playing teemo KRYPTECDEMISE3: infinite sustain poke aout damages all mid laners while tanking more KRYPTECDEMISE3: cho mid is broken KRYPTECDEMISE3: you obviously have not KRYPTECDEMISE3: played against him KRYPTECDEMISE3: you have no room to talk until you have played a cho in mid KRYPTECDEMISE3: i main mid KRYPTECDEMISE3: every time someone plays cho i lose no matter how good they are KRYPTECDEMISE3: the most brain dead player could play him KRYPTECDEMISE3: look at the fucking damage he does KRYPTECDEMISE3: half life with 1 q KRYPTECDEMISE3: while he sustains KRYPTECDEMISE3: 1v1 me with a real champion kid KRYPTECDEMISE3: 1 q and it hits half my life you have 1 item KRYPTECDEMISE3: look KRYPTECDEMISE3: at that KRYPTECDEMISE3: 1 q KRYPTECDEMISE3: ONE just got chat restriced on my newest account with this match. i made a new account so i could get hexatech crates and once again restricted
you wanna say that is not harassment? KRYPTECDEMISE3: people who play cho'garth mid are litteral garbage KRYPTECDEMISE3: if you actually think zed is broken KRYPTECDEMISE3: you're bronze 5 KRYPTECDEMISE3: you have no room to talk until you have played a cho in mid that is invalid: KRYPTECDEMISE3: cho > infinit sustain
: except not once did i break the rules set. riot's idea of "verbal abuse" were set to the standards of pre-schoolers. so much as simply disagreeing with someone has gotten me not only chat restricted after not being restricted for over a month, but because i was resricted again a temp ban. my logs have not once been repeatitive flaming, slurs, or anything similar
show an example of an "verbal abuse" which is not in your opinion .. complete chat log not only the a snippet.
i am jin (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Anraton,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=TubM1tdm,comment-id=000000010000,timestamp=2016-03-31T07:37:03.975+0000) > > Depending on how the game goes .. but on bad lanes .. defenitive ... reason ... it is bonus hp your enemy needs to reduce -> you and your adc live longer -> bigger chance to win fights > > wile it is most likely 1, maximal 2 hits in a direct fight you AND/OR your adc can take more ... compared to the BONUS MAGIC DAMAGE: 20 / 30 / 40 / 50 / 60 ... i think the additional 1-2 attacks are stronger. And you can recover easier after a fight (if you have enough mana left) > > Same reason, i max Q on taric first over W .. additional HP are more effective then additional armor. > > > Note: > Personal opinions here - nothing i could proove to be correct. What about E? And why is Q the most popular and superior choice most of the time? Sure w seems completely fine as it is, but there rarely seems to be an incentive to max it first over Q, let alone E.
Well ... Sona q deals damage ... it aggressive, it is about taking the initiative .... W is more defensive/supportive so which one to max first is ... to a certain point a matter of mindset.
: sick of riot's bans
Well ... Riot set up rules. You agreed to observe them. Don'T complain you get punished if you don't.
i am jin (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Anraton,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=TubM1tdm,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-03-31T06:49:14.558+0000) > > you mised the SHIELD STRENGTH: 35 / 55 / 75 / 95 / 115 (+ 20% AP) (+ 10 / 20 / 40) at her W > > so basically you got an "bonus hp pool" of 75/105/145/185/225 + 40% AP, and don't forget the missing hp scaling on the heal part. Do you max W when you play sona?
Depending on how the game goes .. but on bad lanes .. defenitive ... reason ... it is bonus hp your enemy needs to reduce -> you and your adc live longer -> bigger chance to win fights wile it is most likely 1, maximal 2 hits in a direct fight you AND/OR your adc can take more ... compared to the BONUS MAGIC DAMAGE: 20 / 30 / 40 / 50 / 60 ... i think the additional 1-2 attacks are stronger. And you can recover easier after a fight (if you have enough mana left) Same reason, i max Q on taric first over W .. additional HP are more effective then additional armor. Note: Personal opinions here - nothing i could proove to be correct.
: > [{quoted}](name=Anraton,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=EV5n2PUB,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-03-31T07:17:45.773+0000) > > because in low elo you don'T have enough cc/don't use it properly ... and the jungler isn't denying enough big monsters to reduce sated stacking speed. To be fair it's also tough in solo queve to A. Coordinate your cc sometimes and B. The maw/steraks shield combo is absolutely stupid. Just by the yi's game decisions and how he played I could tell that he wasn't the most skilled.. and that's fine it really is. What gets me however is he feels to rewarding to play when building sated when you compare him to how difficult he is to play. Let's take Draven for example, he's by know means easy to play. However once you get proficient with him(catching axes and what not) he begins to feel very rewarding to play and that I think is a good champion design. Many champions that run sated don't really have too much mechanically for the kind of reward that sated offers. This is ofcourse my personal opinion.. but especially in yi's case, true damage is not able to be mitigated so a couple hundred true damage every 2 autos doesn't feel fun to play against at all. I appreciate you for not dowvoting me by the way, and I'm glad that we can have a civil discussion :)
Well .. to adress that, yi got a change last patch .... and i expect the'll continue work on it if necessary ...
Troodon (NA)
: Purchasing Riot Points, Unlocked Skin and Disabled to play with.
: I can't seem to figure it out..
because in low elo you don'T have enough cc/don't use it properly ... and the jungler isn't denying enough big monsters to reduce sated stacking speed.
: Frag... Keys
key =!= key fragment ... key fragments are shown in the "loot" space .. with shards and chests .. klick the fragments anf do a 3 fragments -> 1 key transformation
: What's the reasoning for Sona's W and E being practically unchanged with rank?
you mised the SHIELD STRENGTH: 35 / 55 / 75 / 95 / 115 (+ 20% AP) (+ 10 / 20 / 40) at her W so basically you got an "bonus hp pool" of 75/105/145/185/225 + 40% AP, and don't forget the missing hp scaling on the heal part.
Imaginng (NA)
: I need help, my account got hacked
Well ... did you use such a "free rp" link and entered your login data there?
FrankerX (EUW)
: what what? 51+9 is not 59. its 60.
> [{quoted}](name=Anraton,realm=EUW,application-id=LqLKtMpN,discussion-id=aegEiUlK,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2016-03-30T13:54:44.221+0000) > > I expect it to be a rounding issue ... > like 50.7 + 8.7 = 59.4 ... while display would be 51 + 9 ...
Kothlim (NA)
: Spell Thiefs Edge Not Working
you know it is deactivated for 12? secs if you kill a minion?
Show more

Anraton

Level 71 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion