Ooduwa (NA)
: Ranked has truned me into a Toxic player
> When ultimately your wins and losses, and therefore your rank, is out of your control. I get what you're trying to say, but at the end of the day, your input is what matters the most when it comes to determining your rank. I used to give 200% every game in order to try and carry my team, but have recently stopped doing so. I play with 100% of my capacity and rely on my teammates way too much, which isn't the best way to climb. Then again, I don't care. I've been playing this game for well over eight years now, and it's safe to say that I've lost quite a bit of interest in it. But, that's not to say I'm blaming my teammates for *not allowing me to climb higher*. While there are some really bad games out there (they just happen, you can't prevent that), the majority of your games **can** be determined by your very own input. That's why high elo players often tend to easily grind through lower elo tiers (on their smurfs). Keep in mind that your enemy team is more likely to have a bad player/troll. After all, you're playing with 4 strangers (you're filling the last spot), whereas the enemy team has 5 of them. Statistically, you should be at an advantage.
: If the notice is rare, why do I get it nearly every time I report someone for toxicity?
> [{quoted}](name=Scottsc20,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=8U5EQA9K,comment-id=0000000000010000,timestamp=2019-09-11T01:04:45.189+0000) > > If the notice is rare, why do I get it nearly every time I report someone for toxicity I get it? That message appears only sometimes and under certain circumstances. It's not a good indicator of how many people you've "successfully gotten restricted/banned". That in intentional, so as to reduce spam.
: restrictions for nothing "dying game"
Constantly picking on your teammates and belittling them doesn't seem like "nothing". This whole chat log is cluttered with insults and provocative behaviour.
: How long Is Honor 0?
Since bringing threads back from the dead is akin to spamming and against the rules, I'm going to have to go ahead and lock this one by sending it into the realm of darkness for voidlings to feast upon. If you'd like to discuss this topic, I recommend creating a new thread and presenting your points there! 🔒 If you have any questions or concerns about this action, please visit us in the Moderation Discord [here](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification).
: Can you not earn mastery 7 tokens on Twisted Treeline?
Since bringing threads back from the dead is akin to spamming and against the rules, I'm going to have to go ahead and lock this one by sending it into the realm of darkness for voidlings to feast upon. If you'd like to discuss this topic, I recommend creating a new thread and presenting your points there! 🔒 If you have any questions or concerns about this action, please visit us in the Moderation Discord [here](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification).
: NO experience players.
I've gone ahead and sent the last part of your thread to the Void for voidlings to feast on, as it was going against our naming and shaming rule. This is just a nudge to remind you that you shouldn't call other people out while discussing things on the Boards, as starting witch hunts isn't something we condone.
: wtf does this have to do with league
> [{quoted}](name=Pals Before Gals,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=tenIm9Go,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-09-07T15:32:19.715+0000) > > wtf does this have to do with league Rengar is a kitty, so... Yeah... Take that... <_<
: I taught my cat that if he brings me a toy, I'll throw it for him.
Dude same, and I also accompany the whole experience with some treats in order to boost his training XP.
PaSwG (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Bianca Colt,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=4Rt6vHIE,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-09-07T04:22:01.269+0000) > > In order for your account status to improve, you have to play the game. Being inactive will not trigger the decay. It also takes quite a bit of time (games) to drop a tier. So there is a decay system? Neat, I came back from a ban around October last month and assumed all was fine and dandy Like I said, I'll just have to wait and hope Riot attempts the un-ban experiment again, until then I'll take the ban and quit the game, not like I was very good anyways
> [{quoted}](name=PaSwG,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=4Rt6vHIE,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-09-07T04:26:15.080+0000) > > So there is a decay system? Neat, I came back from a ban around October last month and assumed all was fine and dandy > Like I said, I'll just have to wait and hope Riot attempts the un-ban experiment again, until then I'll take the ban and quit the game, not like I was very good anyways Take care 🧡!
PaSwG (NA)
: Permanently Banned
> Dunno, I just feel older players who get punishments years ago should maybe have those decay so they aren't permabanned years later for a few lousy games? In order for your account status to improve, you have to play the game. Being inactive will not trigger the decay. It also takes quite a bit of time (games) to drop a tier.
Skreame (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Bianca Colt,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=BQ763soP,comment-id=00020000000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-07T01:10:27.228+0000) > > It may be a little bit outdated, but it is the closest we have to actual statistics in regards to player behaviour and reform rates. > It doesn't mean anything if the topic is about today's game. I asked you about today's population with a point about players who got famous over the last few years. Even if these statistics are relevant, they are manipulated outcomes from standards that are not openly defined or agreeable. It's just a reassurance post from a former resigned employee on an ask.fm of all places. > Not much has changed. The IFS has been functional for quite some time, and the Honor update was just an addition that was built around the IFS and then incorporated into the game. > These sources are from Lyte who left in 2016. The actual likelihood is that these statistics are from a system that had a drastically different population from early 2016 to late 2015 and saying not much has changed is honestly surprising to me when inting and afking has never been more prominent. The whole point is that the system isn't changed. Arguing that the system that has remained stagnant for a period of 4 years is still ok, while things like honor have had a complete overhaul twice, a new client, and a plethora of new facets to the game is astounding. > This doesn't pertain to detection. If you **do get caught**, 1 game is more than enough for you to get hit with a suspension (14 days). > > I'm not sure I'm following the second part, though. That's exactly what happens when you repeatedly leave games. What is the significance of boasting an action that is a consequence of a system that doesn't actually work? The system effectively doesn't exist. They announced "implementing a detection system" in 2015 and never once has their been a perceivable decrease in trolling, nor have Riot actually given any statistics or data to support it. The leaverbuster system is another failed creation as it effectively gives the grieving players a timer notification of when they need to move their mouse and pretend to interact with the store while they AFK the game as their hostage. How many people have you ever seen complain or talk about leaverbuster? How is the detection system seriously failing to produce results in conjunction with leaverbuster? It's mind-boggling.
> [{quoted}](name=Skreame,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=BQ763soP,comment-id=000200000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-07T01:45:04.872+0000) > What is the significance of boasting an action that is a consequence of a system that doesn't actually work? The system effectively doesn't exist It does exist, it's just flawed. That is to be expected since you have to prove one's intent, which is not an easy task. Besides, we all know that the Feederbuster is quite lackluster. > The leaverbuster system is another failed creation as it effectively gives the grieving players a timer notification of when they need to move their mouse and pretend to interact with the store while they AFK the game as their hostage. It doesn't work that way. The system tracks more data than just that. Moving around your base every now and then **will** eventually result in you getting a LPQ. It's a common misconception, and I've seen numerous cases like this before on the EUW Boards. The reason people don't complain about it as much is because it inherently doesn't restrict anything, nor can it have any meaningful consequences (aside from you having to watch a YouTube video while waiting for the timer to drop down).
Skreame (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Bianca Colt,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=BQ763soP,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2019-09-07T00:44:00.634+0000) > > You can find all the information in this neat [library](https://en.volu-eu.org/library.php). Hope this helps. Nowhere in any of those sources do they give meaningful statistics. One article boasts a 92% reform rate for first time experiences with the instant feedback system, but does not define the criteria of "reform" whether that means no additional punishments within one week, one year, or perhaps if their "behavior" improved by only one unit of their metric temporarily. This article also has the premise of using these statistics to justify the instant feedback system of restrictions over instant temporary and permanent bans, which is exactly the same sentiment as OP with his preventative measures and chances to reform, over reactive punishment. The source is also provided by Riot Lyte, who left before the culmination of the Honor system as what it is today and subsequently this iteration of the Punishment system. Interestingly the very same source that questionable statistic came from says verabtim: "Actually, players who troll or intentionally feed now receive 14-day or permanent bans for their offenses after 1-2 games. Players who leave/AFK receive up to 20 minute Low Priority Queues for repeated offenses too." We both know that is entirely not the case. This whole library you linked to me has no updates past 2017, so I would like to ask if this is where you got your insinuation from as well.
> [{quoted}](name=Skreame,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=BQ763soP,comment-id=0002000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-07T01:01:09.709+0000) > This whole library you linked to me has no updates past 2017, so I would like to ask if this is where you got your insinuation from as well. It may be a little bit outdated, but it is the closest we have to actual statistics in regards to player behaviour and reform rates. > The source is also provided by Riot Lyte, who left before the culmination of the Honor system as what it is today and subsequently this iteration of the Punishment system. Not much has changed. The IFS has been functional for quite some time, and the Honor update was just an addition that was built around the IFS and then incorporated into the game. > Actually, players who troll or intentionally feed now receive 14-day or permanent bans for their offenses after 1-2 games > Players who leave/AFK receive up to 20 minute Low Priority Queues for repeated offenses too. >We both know that is entirely not the case. This doesn't pertain to detection. If you **do get caught**, 1 game is more than enough for you to get hit with a suspension (14 days). I'm not sure I'm following the second part, though. That's exactly what happens when you repeatedly leave games.
: Very good . Thank you very much . Ill be delleting this post in an hour so any people from the other answers have anything else to say . Appriciate your time . Good night.,
> [{quoted}](name=LethalKunai,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=XELPzKvn,comment-id=0003000100000000,timestamp=2019-09-07T00:56:23.387+0000) > > Very good . Thank you very much . Ill be delleting this post in an hour so any people from the other answers have anything else to say . Appriciate your time . Good night., Have a good one! ❤️
: Last question before i delete this thread! Do comments such as "Fking good job! , Jesus fking christ well fking done , You fking amazing" and that sort of comments , do they trigger the system in any way if the player saying them gets a troll report from a random guy in the match ?
> [{quoted}](name=LethalKunai,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=XELPzKvn,comment-id=00030001,timestamp=2019-09-07T00:41:52.320+0000) > > Last question before i delete this thread! > Do comments such as "Fking good job! , Jesus fking christ well fking done , You fking amazing" and that sort of comments , do they trigger the system in any way if the player saying them gets a troll report from a random guy in the match ? Generally, no, because you're not using those words to insult someone. Profanity won't get you in trouble unless you're using it to belittle or attack another player in any way, shape or form. However, be cautious with it. There are always better ways to express your gratitude towards someone or to congratulate them on getting a pentakill. Err on the side of caution, as you never know how someone might interpret those words (which could then lead to you having to justify yourself to support and all that stuff). But, as I said, profanity (in general) is not an issue. The issue lies in using it to stir up drama and disparage others.
Skreame (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Bianca Colt,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=BQ763soP,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-09-07T00:05:21.399+0000) > > which is why it boasts high reform rates. It's safe to say that it's pretty effective in what it is doing. Is there anything you can link that verifies this? I don't see how you could ever insinuate this when the last few years, people like Tyler1, Pornstar Zilean7, RatIRL, all get famous and idolized for their toxic behavior and running it down.
> [{quoted}](name=Skreame,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=BQ763soP,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-09-07T00:32:09.559+0000) > > Is there anything you can link that verifies this? I don't see how you could ever insinuate this when the last few years, people like Tyler1, Pornstar Zilean7, RatIRL, all get famous and idolized for their toxic behavior and running it down. You can find all the information in this neat [library](https://en.volu-eu.org/library.php). Hope this helps.
: How about having both 0 tolerance system AND pre-filtering system
While I find the first part of your idea interesting, I don't think I can say the same for the second part. Giving people more chances to ruin other people's games isn't the right way to go. Besides, the current punishment system is a result of numerous testings, evaluations and adjustments, which is why it boasts high reform rates. It's safe to say that it's pretty effective in what it is doing.
: Got banned from a game where i had 4 AFK ?!?! Is this a Joke or something?
> I understand if i got a suspension for toxicity/inting/feeding/griefing but for literally trying to win i get a fking game suspension ? It is nice that you tried your best to win the game, but according to your chat logs, it is fairly visible that you were displaying certain toxic behavioural patterns, which ultimately got targeted by the system. Mind you that due to your previous 25-game chat restriction, your account had been placed on thinner ice, resulting in less overall tolerance and leniency when it comes to dealing with situations of this nature. This also means that any further violations will end up in a permanent account suspension.
Wham III (NA)
: Yes, but what you left out was your take on rogue accounts and that is what I was most interested to hear.
> [{quoted}](name=Wham III,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=XXoxrwhl,comment-id=0000000100000000000100010001000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-05T15:30:21.461+0000) > > Yes, but what you left out was your take on rogue accounts and that is what I was most interested to hear. If someone wants to waste their time creating and levelling numerous accounts, just to misbehave and get banned again, then I don't know. They won't stay for long, as the system will target them rather quickly. However, I don't think that's what "this rule" is encouraging at all. It's a stretch to proclaim something like that without providing any evidence.
Wham III (NA)
: Okay, but then what is the penalty for hacking and intentional feeding? All this rule does is encourage people to create alternate accounts where they probably get really nasty. What say you to that queen moderator?
> [{quoted}](name=Wham III,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=XXoxrwhl,comment-id=00000001000000000001000100010000,timestamp=2019-09-05T15:00:16.961+0000) > > Okay, but then what is the penalty for hacking and intentional feeding? All this rule does is encourage people to create alternate accounts where they probably get really nasty. What say you to that queen moderator? Hacking will result in immediate account termination. Intentional feeding will net you a 14-day account suspension on your first offence, followed by a permanent suspension upon another detection. As you can see, chat related penalties are way more lenient in comparison to being caught hacking or intentionally feeding. You get three chances (two of which do not prohibit access to your account) before you permanently lose your account.
Voldymort (EUNE)
: so... what was your old name?
> [{quoted}](name=Voldymort,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=XXoxrwhl,comment-id=00000001000000000001000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-05T14:19:44.284+0000) > > so... what was your old name? I tend to change my name frequently. The most recent ones were KDA Umbra and another one which I shall not name, in fear of someone snatching it (but it starts with Gimme)! https://i.imgur.com/PYKEo1j.png
: > [{quoted}](name=Bianca Colt,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=XXoxrwhl,comment-id=00000001000000000001,timestamp=2019-09-05T13:57:59.674+0000) > > The rules are pretty simple though: don't be a nuisance and flame other people. Name change or new mod?
> [{quoted}](name=KFCeytron,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=XXoxrwhl,comment-id=000000010000000000010000,timestamp=2019-09-05T14:05:25.619+0000) > > Name change or new mod? Name change, but I've had it for a couple of months now.
Wham III (NA)
: Sure the rules are simple, but the consequences are indeed not.
> [{quoted}](name=Wham III,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=XXoxrwhl,comment-id=000000010000000000010001,timestamp=2019-09-05T14:07:06.721+0000) > > Sure the rules are simple, but the consequences are indeed not. Consequences aren't meant to be taken lightly. If Riot were to allow people to just do whatever they want, no one would be playing their game anymore. It is also worth stressing that you won't get permanently suspended for chat misdemeanour that easily (unless we're talking about extreme cases which include, but are not limited to, racism, homophobia, xenophobia etc.). You have to go through a series of steps before you finally overdo it, at which point you have no one else to blame but yourself.
Wham III (NA)
: I'm sorry but like most normal human beings I don't read pages of fine text to memorize every rule. Only now that I realize how riot operates (indeed as a terrible company) am I posting a suggestion. Riot is the company and it shouldn't be me in their target audience, but them in mine. Nowhere in their chat warnings did it say anything about a fourteen day banishment and deletion after. Anyone who would accept and defend that is seriously out of their mind. There are so many good video games (and companies) out there that don't take dumps on their supporters.
> [{quoted}](name=Wham III,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=XXoxrwhl,comment-id=0000000100000000,timestamp=2019-09-05T13:49:34.389+0000) > > I'm sorry but like most normal human beings I don't read pages of fine text to memorize every rule. The rules are pretty simple though: don't be a nuisance and flame other people.
Anatera (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Bianca Colt,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=rneiEosu,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-09-04T20:49:26.214+0000) > > Pretty much what Gatekeeper said. Keep the chat muted if it gets toxic and enjoy your game. You're allowed to play whatever you want, as long as you're aiming to win. In a TEAM game, huh? Fantastic.
> [{quoted}](name=Anatera,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=rneiEosu,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-09-04T20:59:52.977+0000) > > In a TEAM game, huh? Fantastic. If your team is flaming you, then yeah, I would personally resort to using the mute button. Pings should be more than enough to communicate your thoughts and intentions, should you need to do so. Not much of a team if all participants don't act like they're one.
RookieUS (NA)
: How can you learn characters without p*ssing people off?
Pretty much what Gatekeeper said. Keep the chat muted if it gets toxic and enjoy your game. You're allowed to play whatever you want, as long as you're aiming to win.
: What is wrong with the punishment system?
> each time I report these players I feel like my reports are ignored, and they simply continue to be extremely toxic parts of the game that completely destroy it. Don't worry, they're not. It's just that the Feederbuster tends to be quite lackluster in terms of actually determining when someone is intentionally feeding **and ** reacting to it. Then again, that is to be expected because it is hard to prove one's **intent** (which is the core of intentional feeding). Of course, there are some ridiculous cases where people slip under the radar for way too long, but what can you do. :sadpepe:
Mr Meat (OCE)
: "You wouldn't be here if you didn't care at all about them." ?????????????????????? "Most of what you said such as, stat tracking has been around forever actually translates to the point that people like you do want them to be free." No, it doesn't you absolute soft brain. It doesn't translate to shit. You literally are just assuming that. So you're saying that because I'm calling the sale of an item bullshit, that I immediately want them to be free? **(removed by moderation)** "So you don't have to say it directly when it gets implied by the context of what is written..." You didn't even read/respond to most of what I said. You are just assuming everything. Everything you have said thus far about any of my opinions is entirely made up by you. Still waiting for that part where I said I wanted them to be free. "...cause if you didn't care you wouldn't be here." And I never said I didn't care about this? **(removed by moderation)** "Otherwise you're just here to troll people" **(removed by moderation)** You haven't addressed what I've said to you at all. You just keep going on like the broken record I've described you as. You either are misrepresenting what I'm saying, or assuming things based on your own ideas about what my opinions are. So I'll boil it down for you, so it's as easy as pie. Respond to the following: - The OP is correct: this is a dirty way to make money, and the eternals are not wanted by the community; the community wants gameplay content. OR - You are wrong: the community has a say in what content goes into the product they use. Playing ignorant - especially after the last two years of riot losing money - is not an option. Do not tell me what you think my opinion is. Don't try and justify what you've said so far. Just actually reply to the topic at hand, and don't go off on a tangent. **(removed by moderation)**
> [{quoted}](name=Mr Meat,realm=OCE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=WTUA5fly,comment-id=0006000100000001000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-16T11:34:41.240+0000) I've gone ahead and sent some of the stuff you wrote in your responses into the Void for voidlings to feast on. Please remain civil when having a discussion with other users and refrain from using insults while trying to have a reasoned debate.
: Lore Power Levels Revised: The Magus Tier
Since bringing threads back from the dead is akin to spamming and against the rules, I'm going to have to go ahead and lock this one by sending it into the realm of darkness for voidlings to feast upon. If you'd like to discuss this topic, I recommend creating a new thread and presenting your points there! 🔒 If you have any questions or concerns about this action, please visit us in the Moderation Discord [here](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification).
: Wondering about my 10 game chat restriction
> Not a fan of losing my Honor 4 that I worked hard for and season rewards because of some deal made between someone on my team that was a douche to me all game If someone is abusing you via chat, mute them and report them afterwards. Don't engage in a war of circular flaming and scream at each other back and forth. Two wrongs don't make a right. To be honest, a chat log of this caliber wouldn't necessarily warrant a chat restriction. It could be that you've been using this behavioural pattern (minor toxicity) throughout an extended period of time, which has ultimately amounted to the current penalty.
: Karma mains asked for a gameplay update. We did not ask for number buffs.
Still waiting for her pointless passive to get merged with her R... Maybe one day...
darkdill (NA)
: Aww, no interaction between Swain and Kled...
Since bringing threads back from the dead is akin to spamming and against the rules, I'm going to have to go ahead and lock this one by sending it into the realm of darkness for voidlings to feast upon. If you'd like to discuss this topic, I recommend creating a new thread and presenting your points there! 🔒 If you have any questions or concerns about this action, please visit us in the Moderation Discord [here](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification).
: So, Riot.....about that Silver Kayle...
Since bringing threads back from the dead is akin to spamming and against the rules, I'm going to have to go ahead and lock this one by sending it into the realm of darkness for voidlings to feast upon. If you'd like to discuss this topic, I recommend creating a new thread and presenting your points there! 🔒 If you have any questions or concerns about this action, please visit us in the Moderation Discord [here](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification).
DatLegend27 (EUNE)
: Top 10 Strongest Champions (According To Lore)
Since bringing threads back from the dead is akin to spamming and against the rules, I'm going to have to go ahead and lock this one by sending it into the realm of darkness for voidlings to feast upon. If you'd like to discuss this topic, I recommend creating a new thread and presenting your points there! 🔒 If you have any questions or concerns about this action, please visit us in the Moderation Discord [here](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification).
: How exactly did Swain conquer the demon of secrets?
Since bringing threads back from the dead is akin to spamming and against the rules, I'm going to have to go ahead and lock this one by sending it into the realm of darkness for voidlings to feast upon. If you'd like to discuss this topic, I recommend creating a new thread and presenting your points there! 🔒 If you have any questions or concerns about this action, please visit us in the Moderation Discord [here](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification).
Tecniqe (NA)
: Permanently Banned for what?
Currently, there are no bans being issued to players who prematurely leave games. Instead, there's a low priority queue that forces you to wait extra couple of minutes before you can queue up for a game. Are you sure that the ban has any relevance to you being AFK in one game? What does the report card say?
: When mods get their mod card
Oh I love this XD {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}} I shall treasure this GIF with my life
: chatbanned for this?
Aggravating other players and constantly attacking and blaming them is something that can warrant a strike, yes. It classifies as toxic behaviour. Usually, a chat log like this _wouldn't_ necessarily net a chat restriction on its own (especially if we're talking about a clean account), so I'm assuming this is the kind of behaviour you've been exhibiting throughout an extended period of time.
SStick (EUNE)
: Penalization in 2019
> I am afraid to type a single word just because this system can be abused and multiple players can report me for no good reason. The system cannot be abused, as it doesn't care about the number of reports received. One report is all it takes to instigate an investigation. If the system finds you guilty, it will punish you accordingly, regardless of how many players reported you in a game (as long as it's >0).
: Cocoon From Pokemon you didn't even bother reading OPs argument you are just throwing shit at him and reasoning for riots side Cocoon : pupal casing made by moth caterpillars Raccoon and coon are interchangeable for : an animal His nicknames Icecoon and Firecoon as he stated are derived from long time ago from The Cocoon word and name of a Pokemon and Coon alone regardless of it's meaning as a slur defined by some noname in an unknown time period does not give it weight over the real meaning of the word established for over hundreds of years get over your sjw high horse and stop trying to find offense where there is none because that precisely makes you the one being offensive
I'm with you on this one. Seems like an exaggeration to be honest.
man of tin (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=KDA Umbra,realm=EUW,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=L4EGfdsv,comment-id=0008,timestamp=2019-04-11T14:13:37.571+0000) > > You've made me like Morde. I hate you. B-but who doesn't like Morde?
https://t4.rbxcdn.com/7ddae6830a1ed6d86b697d3a38609aa0
: Just some Morde I've been drawing recently
You've made me like Morde. I hate you. > ### *But seriously though, that's a really nice drawing!*
: Popular opinion: don’t play league if you’re not in the mood for league
: Does Riot ban inters?
Yes, they do. It's just that handling such cases can get tough, as we're talking about game related offenses, which are generally much harder to accurately detect and punish. Also, in the future, refrain from naming and shaming other players on the Boards because this is not the right place for that.
: i basically inted my last 2 games
It's not about the KDA, but the intent. If you were intentionally trying to sabotage those games, then you could potentially get targeted by the system. Having a bad score is not against the rules, so you don't have to worry about a thing (as long as your intent was to win the games)! {{sticker:sg-ezreal}}
Farmer (NA)
: Honor reset and checkpoints
Regaining your honour is a tedious process, so it might take a while before you reach higher honour standings. > i'm doing good just muting everyone at the start of every game Allegedly, you can get a small boost to your honour just by being nice and displaying positive behavioural patterns. It expedites the process ever so slightly. That's why I recommend utilizing the chat and leaning towards the more positive side, rather than being neutral (muting and not talking). > wondering why is there no progress bar for honor Among many reasons, the most prominent one pertains to preventing people from grinding honour, which would completely defeat the purpose of being an honourable player.
: Sona's Ultimate with Tritanomaly
I wish League had more options that could facilitate the experience for people with health problems. In addition to some visual assistance, it would be really nice to introduce certain notifiers for globally announcing ultimates, such as Sion's (for people with hearing difficulties). They would be a very helpful addition to the game for many players. As others have already pointed out, the best thing you can do at the moment is enable indicators :/
: >Example: "You are stupid" - actionable "All people are stupid" - not so much But the thread he talks about isn't saying "all ppl are stupid", is calling monkeys a specific part of the playerbase, in this case Riven mains. What, I'm allowed to say that all supp mains are monkeys for example ? It's okay to insult if you only target a part of the playerbase ?
> [{quoted}](name=Sir Saltarin,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=fJ4MEUiW,comment-id=00090001,timestamp=2019-03-03T15:13:07.270+0000) > > But the thread he talks about isn't saying "all ppl are stupid", is calling monkeys a specific part of the playerbase, in this case Riven mains. The same principle applies. Mind you that the author of this thread is also withholding the truth. What they said in that thread differs from what is presented here. Their words were actually much more insolent. > > What, I'm allowed to say that all supp mains are monkeys for example ? The thing is, you just have to know your boundaries. Saying "all supp mains are monkeys" wouldn't necessarily warrant a strike, **but that doesn't mean it's encouraged**.
: > [{quoted}](name=KDA Umbra,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=fJ4MEUiW,comment-id=0009,timestamp=2019-03-03T14:45:12.620+0000) > > There's a difference. One is direct (personal) and the other isn't. > > Example: "You are stupid" - actionable > "All people are stupid" - not so much > > However, I would err on the side of caution, cause calling the mods monkeys multiple times in the same thread is just provocation at this point. I've had posts removed as being disrespectful simply because the mod doesn't like them or me. It's happened with at least 2 moderators so far.
> [{quoted}](name=Busty Kunoichi,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=fJ4MEUiW,comment-id=00090000,timestamp=2019-03-03T15:02:23.887+0000) > > I've had posts removed as being disrespectful simply because the mod doesn't like them or me. > > It's happened with at least 2 moderators so far. That is not common practice and is strictly forbidden. If a moderator were to do that, they would soon be caught red-handed and met with disciplinary measures.
Corvin0716 (EUNE)
: [Removed by Moderation] Moderators
There's a difference. One is direct (personal) and the other isn't. Example: "You are stupid" - actionable "All people are stupid" - not so much However, I would err on the side of caution, cause calling the mods monkeys multiple times in the same thread is just provocation at this point.
Myrmiron (EUW)
: Yes, and it should work like "unskilled" did before they removed it.
> [{quoted}](name=Myrmiron,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=TtL6zOA1,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-02-27T20:45:58.741+0000) > > Yes, and it should work like "unskilled" did before they removed it. So... it shouldn't work at all? Those were placebo reports, they didn't do anything.
Show more

Bianca Colt

Level 221 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion