: League of legends players are too soft
> [{quoted}](name=HallPanter,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=rFBiBlZ3,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-16T12:49:50.848+0000) > > I found a list of banned league words and i dont undetstand why would words like shit,fuck,smartass,skeez,sheep,scam,%%%%%%%%%,ass and sheepShagger??? be bannable That's a list of censored words for people that choose to keep the vulgar language filter. It has nothing to do with the so called "banwords".
: Try playing a champion with numerous bugs that have been present for more than a year. Even worse Riot is aware of them. 3 out of 4 of Warwicks abilities have some serious bugs: q: Dmg not going off when vision lost but still using mana and going on cd, not being able to use the dash through units, dmg going off delayed as well as the heal causing you to straight up die and still do q dmg after death. w: pathing issues where you're in the blood trail, not in combat but still losing the bonus movespeed R: Dash cancels mid flight if enemies OR ALLIES {{summoner:4}} in it's radius. This occurs 100% of the time. I've personally ulted THROUGH players who were feared happens rarely but still. Not as bad as some champions whose numerous bugs have become a meme {{champion:82}} but still utterly ridiculous that bugs are permitted to last so long.
> [{quoted}](name=Warwick Main,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Aj3AeyuJ,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-03-16T16:51:31.878+0000) > > Try playing a champion with numerous bugs that have been present for more than a year. Even worse Riot is aware of them. 3 out of 4 of Warwicks abilities have some serious bugs: > > q: Dmg not going off when vision lost but still using mana and going on cd, not being able to use the dash through units, dmg going off delayed as well as the heal causing you to straight up die and still do q dmg after death. > w: pathing issues where you're in the blood trail, not in combat but still losing the bonus movespeed > R: Dash cancels mid flight if enemies OR ALLIES {{summoner:4}} in it's radius. This occurs 100% of the time. I've personally ulted THROUGH players who were feared happens rarely but still. > > Not as bad as some champions whose numerous bugs have become a meme {{champion:82}} but still utterly ridiculous that bugs are permitted to last so long. The funniest WW bug is the ability to cancel Zoe's sleep when using your Q right before the effect.
: MAX TENACITY WUKONG BUILD! | 100% IMMUNE TO CC? (OFF-META BUILD) | Ranked P3 Jungle Gameplay
: Idk, but about the "girl support" meme. Isn't THIS phenomenon the reality we already seen?
I'm not sure I'm getting it. Is OP suggesting that girls can only play female characters?
Keyru (NA)
: [UPDATE 2/26] Boards Testing and Thoughts
Having both chronological and discussion modes was a shit decision. Removing either one of them is the right call. You get my full support on this.
: Gameplay Boards: >Wants to go back to when lethality didn't exist forgetting that assasins were stronger back then Me, an intelectual: >Wants to keep lethality because as it is now, lethality make assasins worse
> [{quoted}](name=Sir Saltarin,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=BrdXI73N,comment-id=0001000000000000,timestamp=2019-02-18T16:11:21.593+0000) > > Me, an intelectual: Good one mate!
Ifneth (NA)
: Remember, though, that the proposed Infinity Edge would bring him to two-item performance at only one item. Although it would cost 5,000 gold, the current Infinity Edge costs 3,400, and a Phantom Dancer built beforehand costs 2,700, for a total 6,100 gold cost. Yasuo’s build would effectively accelerate by over 1k gold.
> [{quoted}](name=Ifneth,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Xl90oXZ2,comment-id=0003000600000000,timestamp=2018-12-31T03:16:06.553+0000) > > Remember, though, that the proposed Infinity Edge would bring him to two-item performance at only one item. Although it would cost 5,000 gold, the current Infinity Edge costs 3,400, and a Phantom Dancer built beforehand costs 2,700, for a total 6,100 gold cost. Yasuo’s build would effectively accelerate by over 1k gold. And giving him way less stats and no damage reduction. Look, I'm all for Yasuo put in the dumpster. But that's probably not going to be as strong as you think it will.
Ifneth (NA)
: Uhhh... you do know that this version of IE would give Attack Speed, right? It says 30% AS right in the stat block. Yasuo would just build {{item:3031}} {{item:3006}} {{item:3072}} {{item:3053}} {{item:3022}} {{item:3026}} At just one item plus boots and a vamp scepter, he would have 3-item like performance. At three items, he would become the dreaded Bruiser Yasuo.
> [{quoted}](name=Ifneth,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Xl90oXZ2,comment-id=00030006,timestamp=2018-12-30T10:26:41.439+0000) > > Uhhh... you do know that this version of IE would give Attack Speed, right? It says 30% AS right in the stat block. > > Yasuo would just build > > {{item:3031}} {{item:3006}} {{item:3072}} {{item:3053}} {{item:3022}} {{item:3026}} > > At just one item plus boots and a vamp scepter, he would have 3-item like performance. At three items, he would become the dreaded Bruiser Yasuo. I, too, miss those 50+ minutes games. But it's kind of not happening anytime soon.
: Shouldn't Riot implement a method to detect why someone DC'ed?
*unplugs ethernet* o sori rito no mi folt Not gonna work because the game won't know wether you actually have an internet issue or you shut down your internet / computer. You're basically giving trolls a tool to quit games without getting punished for it.
: show me one high elo pyke mid player
> [{quoted}](name=SociaI Justice,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=qeU4hprA,comment-id=0004000000000000,timestamp=2018-12-29T21:34:27.005+0000) > > show me one high elo pyke mid player Not even an argument.
: his kit really doesn't work for solo lane and he would be far too good of a ganker if he could actually clear the jungle decently.
> [{quoted}](name=SociaI Justice,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=qeU4hprA,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2018-12-29T21:14:20.013+0000) > > his kit really doesn't work for solo lane Meanwhile he destroys mid.
: Off-Brands are better than popular brands, prove me wrong.
lykkelas (NA)
: i'm not saying he's broken. i just don't like the way his kit plays. that one garen main even said he's a stat check champ. like how sad is that. like at least give him 1 (one) skillshot
> [{quoted}](name=lykkelas,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=deGyPA4Y,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2018-12-27T19:13:22.287+0000) > > i'm not saying he's broken. i just don't like the way his kit plays. that one garen main even said he's a stat check champ. like how sad is that. > > like at least give him 1 (one) skillshot Except Garen is not really a stat check champ. His kit is straightforward, that's just it. Not every champion needs to be complicated.
: As you mentioned, the French volunteer program is in an uncertain state at the moment, so they cannot directly address your concerns. I’m taking on that role for the time being, until there is a change. I’ll bring up your response with the moderator and have a response for you, hopefully within a reasonable amount of time.
> [{quoted}](name=Wuks,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=bIwNFQx2,comment-id=000200010000,timestamp=2018-12-29T03:30:02.311+0000) > > As you mentioned, the French volunteer program is in an uncertain state at the moment, so they cannot directly address your concerns. I’m taking on that role for the time being, until there is a change. I’ll bring up your response with the moderator and have a response for you, hopefully within a reasonable amount of time. Take all your time, and thanks for what you're doing!
: Upon further review of this case, the moderators have determined that your thread was a continuation of problematic behaviour on the Boards. The specific thread in question contained a message, spelled out through the first letter of each sentence: > "La modération se fout de notre gueule" which as you know, means "Moderation doesn't care about us", but in more disrespectful way. In conclusion, the thread was disrespectful and was posted in the wrong sub-board. The suspension was applied after years of prior history of problematic behaviour. I appreciate you reaching out on the North American Boards, and I hope I was able to resolve your inquiry regarding the French Boards. Hopefully, the French moderators will be able to address your inquiries directly in the near future. Have a good day!
> [{quoted}](name=Wuks,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=bIwNFQx2,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-12-28T18:44:42.389+0000) > > Upon further review of this case, the moderators have determined that your thread was a continuation of problematic behaviour on the Boards. Problematic behaviour? Such as asking for a clarification on the rules after getting two threads deleted and my account banned for no apparent reason? For clarification, I'm talking about the first one. > [{quoted}](name=Wuks,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=bIwNFQx2,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-12-28T18:44:42.389+0000) > > In conclusion, the thread was disrespectful and was posted in the wrong sub-board. The suspension was applied after years of prior history of problematic behaviour. ? Oh, you mean when I was banned because I made a word play with a famous quote from a famous historical comedian, which the mod admitted having messed up? Or when I was banned for linking a song on youtube on a spam thread because they apparently banned everyone that had posted on that thread, no matter how much they participated in the spam (hint : I posted once)? Or maybe the ban that me and the mod simulated together on my account so we could test a possible security issue on the board? Or you mean that problematic behavior that got me into 0 trouble for quite some time despite posting on the boards every single day? So yeah, I once called a stalker a "son of a bitch" and this was wrong, and I paid for that. I'm not sure what this has to do which today's situation. > The specific thread in question contained a message, spelled out through the first letter of each sentence: "La modération se fout de notre gueule" > > which as you know, means "Moderation doesn't care about us", but in more disrespectful way. It means "Moderation mocks us". And while it's more vulgar than "La modération se moque de nous" it's in no way more disrespectful. I'm also quite intrigued because most people weren't able to decypher that hidden message even when they had a clear explanation on how to do so. And the mod team apparently took the time to read and review my thread, out of all others, so carefully that they found it? How does it work? It took them 30 minutes for that all the while actually reported weird LoL unrelated threads with insults and %%%%philiac references could stay in the same category for days? > I appreciate you reaching out on the North American Boards, and I hope I was able to resolve your inquiry regarding the French Boards. Hopefully, the French moderators will be able to address your inquiries directly in the near future. Have a good day! If they wanted to discuss they would have already. They don't even have a name, and we have to follow rules that aren't even written anywhere. What is this even??? I'm sorry Wuks, I really appreciate your work and what you're doing. You're kind of the man the boards needed. But you haven't resolved anything here besides providing an oddly wrong translation from the sentence "La modération se fout de notre gueule" and no explanation on why my account got banned in the first place. I might add that I'm not pleased at how I've supposedly had a problematic behavior for years when it's just plain wrong. And I truly doubt that my two first threads and their overall really good reception where "problematic" to begin with. And I'm again sorry, but considering that there is **no way to contact the mod team there** I feel obligated to do that here.
Rioter Comments
Tedo58 (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Jerry SeinfeId,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=TivJ8M7l,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-12-28T15:09:42.880+0000) > > well, maybe ur not actually a diamond level player? You are just not allowed to climb at some ppoint.
> [{quoted}](name=Tedo58,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=TivJ8M7l,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-12-28T15:15:01.220+0000) > > You are just not allowed to climb at some ppoint. why others are allowed then kek? You are overestimating your own skill level.
: neeko and buffs mentioned in the same post im fucking triggered 😡
> [{quoted}](name=SociaI Justice,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=RZxjErBZ,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2018-12-26T23:32:01.699+0000) > > neeko and buffs mentioned in the same post im fucking triggered 😡 You were born triggered.
: > [{quoted}](name=DearPear,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=6xOV3foK,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2018-12-26T04:08:20.451+0000) > > You'd have to also halve LP gains to avoid inflating the average rank. And non-leavers wouldn't benefit from that change in the long term. It would still make sense to do this. You qued up to face a full 5 on 5 match. If you're handed a free win then it's no longer a fair system overall. Think of it this way, if you were on the winning side of a 5 v 4 as part of the 5, is it bearable that you gained a little less LP because of the AFK on their team? Otherwise the reverse side is you're losing a full amount of LP for a loss if you're in the same game but on the losing side that really nothing can be done about unless there is a ridiculous skill difference between the two sides. Which one feels worse to you? I wouldn't mind gaining 15 free LP for a free win instead of 20, and having the enemy lose 15 instead of 20 because they basically handed it over. It just means games that have AFK's have less weight compared to a fair full 5 v 5. Which in my opinion makes sense as a measure of skill.
> [{quoted}](name=Arctic Husky,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=6xOV3foK,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2018-12-26T22:07:10.704+0000) > > It would still make sense to do this. You qued up to face a full 5 on 5 match. If you're handed a free win then it's no longer a fair system overall. > > Think of it this way, if you were on the winning side of a 5 v 4 as part of the 5, is it bearable that you gained a little less LP because of the AFK on their team? > > Otherwise the reverse side is you're losing a full amount of LP for a loss if you're in the same game but on the losing side that really nothing can be done about unless there is a ridiculous skill difference between the two sides. > > Which one feels worse to you? > > I wouldn't mind gaining 15 free LP for a free win instead of 20, and having the enemy lose 15 instead of 20 because they basically handed it over. It just means games that have AFK's have less weight compared to a fair full 5 v 5. Which in my opinion makes sense as a measure of skill. It's not so much about how it occasionally feels, it's about how the system would react as a whole. You don't plan on fucking up a whole system to fix a minor issue. This is a mathematical situation, AFKs **will** earn you more LP than they make you lose, period. Any change on LP loss must be exactly mirrored on LP gains so the system isn't totally fucked, meaning that most non-leaving players would benefit more from the current situation than the "fixed" situation.
: Reduce LP loss by half (round it down) for the remaining players if there is an AFK (RIOT PLS LOOK)
You'd have to also halve LP gains to avoid inflating the average rank. And non-leavers wouldn't benefit from that change in the long term.
: I have never got a penta, i have never got a quadra, i have only got a triple 8 times. Say that again, but take out the dumb parts
> [{quoted}](name=DeracadaVenom,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=FtjK9ohy,comment-id=000b0001,timestamp=2018-12-24T22:42:58.281+0000) > > I have never got a penta, i have never got a quadra, i have only got a triple 8 times. > > > > Say that again, but take out the dumb parts Your personnal lack of pentakills is also irrelevant.
D357R0Y3R (EUW)
: Akali's ban rate decreased to 45% after one week
> [{quoted}](name=D357R0Y3R,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=FtjK9ohy,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-12-23T20:07:08.143+0000) > > First timing Irelia should not result in a pentakill First timing many champions can result in a pentakill. That's not relevant.
PhRoXz0n (NA)
: Crit Item Explorations
How about changing crit's behavior to enhance AA's damage by a %, just like crit actually does but now with a constant outcome ?
saltran (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Pierce The Veal,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=j55gmnBc,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2018-12-20T06:39:16.353+0000) > > That’s not true, various champions did buy it. Just because it wasn’t the adc’s favorite item didn’t mean it was terrible and never bought. > > I used to love taking it on nocturne, for one, as did many others. > > Jayce also somewhat liked the item. > > There were a few others, and it was often a good substitute for bloodthirster if you wanted good mana sustain as well. It wasn't a core item on any champ and was even more niche than the current ER on some bruisers. That item was terrible.
> [{quoted}](name=saltran,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=j55gmnBc,comment-id=0002000000000000,timestamp=2018-12-20T10:20:38.087+0000) > > It wasn't a core item on any champ and was even more niche than the current ER on some bruisers. > > That item was terrible. Yet its rework made me stop playing many champions ;)
wolvius (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Jenivie,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=xQ8pPiLs,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2018-12-22T23:57:29.725+0000) > > True invis should be removed, delete the lockout on her ultimate because shes an assassin, why should i have to wait to execute somebody? Make her e1 cast faster or her e2 cast faster, decrease the amout of time she can hold onto her passive auto. I feel they could bring akali back into the spotlight by literally just removing true invis. It should have never made its way into the game, it was so dumb of riot to think people wouldnt permaban her for that. I love akali and with the shroud changes now, im deadass getting cc'd in my shroud because of the prestealth bullshit. Totally unfun to play, hope they open their eyes eventually and realize what they have to do. Yes this, the no counterplay true invisibility was the problem everyone was complaing about and what people were saying to remove as it was unnecessary and broke established game rules. Normal invisibility would have been fine as there are some ways to counter it such as true sight from ignite or specific abilities like cait ult etc. The ult delay should stay but only a small delay like 0.5 or maybe close to 1 second anything longer is stupid for an assassin. If they removed the microstun then no delay would probably be fine even.
> [{quoted}](name=wolvius,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=xQ8pPiLs,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2018-12-23T00:50:56.486+0000) > > Yes this, the no counterplay true invisibility was the problem everyone was complaing about I'm sad Riot did not just remove the true invisibility. You guys would all be REEEEEEEE when you'd realize that her true invisibility does jack shit most of the time.
AR URF (NA)
: Point and click rooting.
Point and click instant distant hard CCs should not exist, period. There are so many better options...
: jax is the only thing preventing worse shit into getting top lane
That means that he is himself worse than these "shit" you're talking about, not the other way around. Also, what are those "worse shit" we are supposed to be seeing whenever Jax is banned?
: You just got a chat-restriction 6 days ago, and another not long before that. Since you are showing a pattern here, the penalty was escalated. As noted in your reform card the next escalation will be to a perma-ban.
> [{quoted}](name=Riot Tantram,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=EFmHfEq8,comment-id=0008,timestamp=2018-12-19T20:22:53.325+0000) > > You just got a chat-restriction 6 days ago, and another not long before that. Since you are showing a pattern here, the penalty was escalated. As noted in your reform card the next escalation will be to a perma-ban. I should add to OP that after a 2-weeks ban even the slightest misbehavior can lead up to a punishment, being a permaban this time;
Leetri (EUW)
: Remove the O in the word "count" and you got yourself an exact match.
> [{quoted}](name=Leetri,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=EFmHfEq8,comment-id=000000000000000100000000,timestamp=2018-12-19T16:22:44.905+0000) > > Remove the O in the word "count" and you got yourself an exact match. But '%%%%' is not a ZT word though. The rest of his logs is really negative and he kept on flaming his jungler. That is the reason for his punishment. Not the typo.
: Its generally not your junglers fault
The junglers have such an early game power over all lanes that it's hard not to be bitter toward your own jungler when you got hard camped and you don't even remember what champion your jungler is playing because you haven't seen him once. Tbh everyone can fuck up and that's it. edit : Personal story. I was under the impression that I was getting camped a lot but really never saw my own jungler in pretty much all my games. So I started an excel file that would record how much ganks I would get from enemies and how much I would get from my own mates. To avoid adding only bad games to the excel file I simply decided to fill the file only if I thought about doing it before the game started and forced me to do so to avoid bias at all cost. I only did that for 8 games, so that's definitly not enough and I'm pretty sure I was just rather unlucky at that time (but damn, the straight bad luck lasted for months). My junglers ganked me a total of 7 times over 8 games, with 3 of these 7 times being a premade of mine. Enemies' junglers ganked me a total of 40 times over 8 games The game I played with a premade that ganked me 3 times, the enemy jungler ganked me 11 times. I won half these games. To be honest, I was really salty about that, it didn't feel fair at all.
: Not terrible, but not useful enough to buy a whole item around when she'd rather have actual damage scaling.
> [{quoted}](name=Morgan le Fey,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=6iEjvWm3,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2018-12-16T17:50:05.679+0000) > > Not terrible, but not useful enough to buy a whole item around when she'd rather have actual damage scaling. I mean, obviously, I just wanted to point out that less known trivia!
: With The Crit Changes They Took Away TWO of Ashe's Main Starting Items
> [{quoted}](name=BrightWîngs,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=6iEjvWm3,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-12-16T03:58:42.037+0000) > > she CAN'T crit by normal means she needs to apply frost shot before she can she can crit It doesn't matter in regard to your thread, but that sentence is wrong. It's not that she can't crit by normal means, it's that her crits do not increase her damage but rather her passive slow. The damage gain when hitting a slowed enemy is a bonus tied to her passive, with a crit chance ratio, but is unrelated to the crit system itself. It means that {{item:3095}} will indeed let her crit with her first hit. But she won't gain any damage from it, just a doubled slow, which is not so bad actually!
: Not looking for appeal. Just showing the report system is shit and so is the playerbase
> [{quoted}](name=Nerf Velkozby,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=HWkiFpZ4,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2018-12-16T07:52:10.658+0000) > > Not looking for appeal. Just showing the report system is shit and so is the playerbase You're kinda prooving otherwise.
: > [{quoted}](name=DearPear,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=EcQc6Efi,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-12-16T12:16:21.090+0000) > > The client has issues this patch and changed your region randomly. That 5Gb patch is due to that. Revert back to your prefered region. I play on EUNE and its still on EUNE. Hasn't changed.
> [{quoted}](name=Ozuma Usmani,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=EcQc6Efi,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-12-16T12:18:57.767+0000) > > I play on EUNE and its still on EUNE. Hasn't changed. Weird stuff then!
: Huge patch (5000mb)
The client has issues this patch and changed your region randomly. That 5Gb patch is due to that. Revert back to your prefered region.
D357R0Y3R (EUW)
: Why are people no longer permabanning Zoe
fun fact, warwick's Q completely nullifies Zoe's sleep.
: in low elo, her popularity moved from roughly 5% to 7% . In high elo, her pick rate moved from 2% to 7% her restealth time MIGHT be the same, but the new shroud allows her to wander in and out to instantly refresh it in in all areas, so that has changed. Even if the same mechanic was present, it only functioned at the outer edges of the shroud. If we want to get technical, we could say it has roughly a 0.2 second at most restealth time just by the time it takes to move in and out so the ability was changed to where there is more area for her to instantly stealth and it is not affected by turrets both of these changes are significant even alone
> [{quoted}](name=3TWarrior,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=rsXYf055,comment-id=00000001000000000000,timestamp=2018-12-15T14:43:32.254+0000) > > in low elo, her popularity moved from roughly 5% to 7% . In high elo, her pick rate moved from 2% to 7% > > her restealth time MIGHT be the same, but the new shroud allows her to wander in and out to instantly refresh it in in all areas There never was "disabled areas" in her shroud. She always could wander in and out for the exact same benefit. > [{quoted}](name=3TWarrior,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=rsXYf055,comment-id=00000001000000000000,timestamp=2018-12-15T14:43:32.254+0000) > > so that has changed. Even if the same mechanic was present, it only functioned at the outer edges of the shroud. Which is actually a downside from current shroud because she can't stand in the middle of it and stay stealthed. > [{quoted}](name=3TWarrior,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=rsXYf055,comment-id=00000001000000000000,timestamp=2018-12-15T14:43:32.254+0000) > > If we want to get technical, we could say it has roughly a 0.2 second at most restealth time just by the time it takes to move in and out If we really want to get technical : she always could go in and out of her shroud and instantly restealth, unless she attacked. 0.65s is the exact time it takes Akali to stealth after an attack. Value unchanged before and after the rework. > [{quoted}](name=3TWarrior,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=rsXYf055,comment-id=00000001000000000000,timestamp=2018-12-15T14:43:32.254+0000) > > so the ability was changed to where there is more area for her to instantly stealth and it is not affected by turrets As I said, the only upside of current shroud is the ability to avoid turret detection. Even then, you have to perfectly time your spells to restealth in between two turret shots and avoid turrets completely while attacking. That's possible though. But I dare you count how many times that actually happens. Also, the overall wideness of her shroud augmented, but the center no longer stealth her, which is a downside by itself. > [{quoted}](name=3TWarrior,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=rsXYf055,comment-id=00000001000000000000,timestamp=2018-12-15T14:43:32.254+0000) > > both of these changes are significant even alone Nah. You guys just whine. I'm ok with you thinking she's unfun to play against. But this is sad to see that you point out issues that were there BEFORE the rework as proofs that the rework itself has issues. And that's really shitty.
: at least half a second or more to invis, did not obscure under turret, I think it's duration was about 4 seconds but I hardly looked it up because it wasn't a real problem...
> [{quoted}](name=3TWarrior,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=rsXYf055,comment-id=000000010000,timestamp=2018-12-15T02:55:51.298+0000) > > at least half a second or more to invis Nope, exact same time. > [{quoted}](name=3TWarrior,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=rsXYf055,comment-id=000000010000,timestamp=2018-12-15T02:55:51.298+0000) > > did not obscure under turret That's right, that's the only upside of current shroud. > [{quoted}](name=3TWarrior,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=rsXYf055,comment-id=000000010000,timestamp=2018-12-15T02:55:51.298+0000) > > I think it's duration was about 4 seconds 8 seconds. It also gave her a blink. It also gave her up to 100% bonus MS compared to the current 40%. It also slowed enemies up to 30%. Oh, it also gave her sight on the area. > [{quoted}](name=3TWarrior,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=rsXYf055,comment-id=000000010000,timestamp=2018-12-15T02:55:51.298+0000) > > but I hardly looked it up because it wasn't a real problem... Actually yes it was. As much as it is now, if not more. But she wasn't nearly as popular as she is now. I'll reiterate. The only true upside of current shroud over past shroud is that turrets won't hit you while you stay camouflaged. It barely happens in any given game. That's strong, I admit that, but that's really not that relevant. Remove that mechanic and Akali will still be as oppressive as you guys believe she is.
Moody P (NA)
: Shyvana has to be the most disappointing champion in the game
: I honestly dont know why Riot is so confused as to how to make Akali not awful to play against...
> [{quoted}](name=PlasmaElement,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=B4Y4eWnG,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-12-14T03:33:59.866+0000) > > ALL > > YOU > > HAVE > > TO > > DO > > IS > > REMOVE > > TRUE > > INVISIBILITY True stealth only matter when hard diving, which Akali won't be doing a whole lot anyway. So yeah, I'm waiting for the mechanic to be removed and for people to keep whining because they realize it really doesn't make a fucking difference.
MVNFRXD (EUNE)
: MAN CMON DON'T BE LIKE THAT.
> [{quoted}](name=MVNFRXD,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=pjWiP8Uq,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2018-12-14T17:11:15.327+0000) > > MAN CMON DON'T BE LIKE THAT. He's being informative. You can't tell people to not be informative.
: > [{quoted}](name=Ozzie Storm,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=iEBklaWn,comment-id=0000000000020000,timestamp=2018-12-13T19:04:05.643+0000) > > lol expecting a "you have pings and voice chat so there's no need for chat to exist" post from riot soon xD Already agree with this. Wish they removed chat and just allowed pings. No more bans, EXCEPT FOR TROLLING.
> [{quoted}](name=No Chat System,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=iEBklaWn,comment-id=00000000000200000000,timestamp=2018-12-13T20:44:35.096+0000) > > Already agree with this. Wish they removed chat and just allowed pings. > No more bans, EXCEPT FOR TROLLING. I mean, just stop using the chat then? Is it that hard?
crazÿ (EUW)
: can you sent their names?
> [{quoted}](name=crazÿ,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=R4wlIyaP,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-12-14T16:55:50.551+0000) > > can you sent their names? no
Khabith (NA)
: everyone targets tf out of akali, her shroud is busted
> [{quoted}](name=Khabith,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=rsXYf055,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-12-14T05:22:20.436+0000) > > everyone targets tf out of akali, her shroud is busted pre-rework shroud was stronger though.
: You're not very smart. He's not implying he's special, he's implying riot is bullshit ting him for something that didn't happen like they always do. They don't care about the player base and they won't care about us for a very long time, not until the game really starts dying. Not once did he say he was special nor deserved anything, he's saying riot is lying about this makeshift ban that did not happen and that they don't care enough about us to give us what we earned.
> [{quoted}](name=4 Stances,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=n2KzIVAO,comment-id=00000002,timestamp=2018-12-13T14:43:21.961+0000) > > You're not very smart. Sorry boyo I can't compete with your otustanding 180 IQ. Blablabla.
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=needHymn,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=x7xOH3zm,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-12-12T22:49:50.393+0000) > > The mistake you made was buying boots on Sona. > > # #NoBootsSonaFTW {{item:3020}}
: Lol, it honestly sounds to me like you just have a hard time playing against her and you want people to agree with you that she's busted and needs to be nerfed but I don't see it man. We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. Like I said in another comment on this thread, she's got a 48.8% win rate. If she was as OP as you're making her out to be, it'd be higher than that.
> [{quoted}](name=Demon DARK Wolf,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=jBzYTs3z,comment-id=00030002000000000000,timestamp=2018-12-11T04:39:24.352+0000) > > Lol, it honestly sounds to me like you just have a hard time playing against her and you want people to agree with you that she's busted and needs to be nerfed but I don't see it man. We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. Like I said in another comment on this thread, she's got a 48.8% win rate. If she was as OP as you're making her out to be, it'd be higher than that. Meanwhile you claim that Akali has OP mechanics while being in the top 5 worse winrates of the game. Be consistent.
CLG ear (NA)
: I spent 40 dollars on a pizza AMA
Was there any big sausage or was it a rip-off?
King Lego (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=DearPear,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=wgEfB7K7,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2018-12-11T17:13:24.008+0000) > > It's funny because "true stealth" only really matters under towers and it's really not that much usefull. Her banrate is really people going REEEEE because she might use it to dive someday. So yeah, removing true stealth would be a good move. Not that it would really change her, but you gotta appease the livestock every once in a while. I don't mind dying to an Akali anywhere when i make a mistake or anything, but dying under my own turret where it's useless is where i draw the line and say "no".
> [{quoted}](name=King Lego,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=wgEfB7K7,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2018-12-11T17:19:43.048+0000) > > I don't mind dying to an Akali anywhere when i make a mistake or anything, but dying under my own turret where it's useless is where i draw the line and say "no". If you are in a situation where Akali can safely kill you under your tower, then almost half the champions can do that too. Xerath can do that under his own tower, Zed has his shadow, Evelynn dashes away + loses tower aggro while executing you, Garen reduces tower damage by a bunch, vladimir loses tower aggro, Lissandra can self R or E away, really listing them randomly. Also, how many times akali does that on average per game? Probably less than 1. Removing her true stealth will appeal to people that are more afraid of what she could do in a perfect situation for her than what she actually does, meaning that she won't suffer to much from the change while reducing by a bunch her banrate.
: Because the only difference between Diamond and Gold is commitment.
> [{quoted}](name=PhearBunny,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=kG2QqAXf,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-12-11T16:07:52.863+0000) > > Because the only difference between Diamond and Gold is commitment. That's a no
Show more

DearPear

Level 126 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion