Rioter Comments
: League of Legends Frog champion idea.
http://cdn-9chat-fun.9cache.com/media/photo/amDlabK6m_480w_v1.jpg
: > [{quoted}](name=DragonTroopBeta,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=bxVTQZdJ,comment-id=000400000000,timestamp=2017-09-16T01:18:01.181+0000) > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm40xf5L0XY pretty sure ardent censors don't stack {{champion:432}}
> [{quoted}](name=Worst Brad Japan,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=bxVTQZdJ,comment-id=0004000000000000,timestamp=2017-09-16T03:17:46.086+0000) > > pretty sure ardent censors don't stack > > {{champion:432}} It was written right at the beginning at 0:18...
: ***
But... Wasn't he talking about Sandsexual? (and the fact that he is an Azir main and he says that his own main is too broken and so accentuating his weaknesses is good)
Epicurus (OCE)
: Maokai has a 100% updated lore right now. He is the nature spirit responsible for populating the Blessed Isles with life. He survived the Ruination and is trying to restore the Isles to life, but his constant ordeals have made him vengeful and spiteful, regressing from the benevolent spirit that he once was.
And when the corruption will finally take over him completely, he will become {{champion:427}}.
: > [{quoted}](name=Soen,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=ZnzbwEgK,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2017-09-12T21:46:59.848+0000) > > Money, was they're thinking. *their
Maybe it was an implied "Money, was (what) they're thinking."
: If Supports were kitties
{{item:3070}} {{champion:12}} {{champion:223}} {{item:3070}}
: If you payed attention you would know that they are already going to do that.
In the article Riot pls: Leveling, Ip and Rewards they said they were going to turn First win of the day into a daily mission. That's probably what you meant. http://www.surrenderat20.net/2017/09/riot-pls-leveling-ip-and-rewards.html
: I don't really see how though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9C_HReR_McQ
Leonerdo (NA)
: Well, part of it is envy, sort of. If Riot were to give everyone one 1000 RP for free, but a few people only got 500 RP, then I think the envy is justified. This is a little different, but still, people feel like Riot is being more generous towards part of the playerbase. The other part is just about the return on investment that people feel like they are getting from their rune purchases. Groups 1&2 feel like the runes were worth it overall. Group 3 might regret some of their purchases, because they didn't get to use them much. 800 IP to buy a rune may have seemed like a good idea before, but 700 IP to _rent_ a rune for 1-2 years... For some of the niche runes that don't get used often, that's a pretty shitty deal in retrospect.
I understand, but, after all, everything is rent in life, especially when talking about an online game. League of Legends may fall tomorrow, for what we know. If that happens, we will lose not only the runes, but also the champions and skin that we bought with time and money. It's silly thinking that this situation is different. After a long time, Riot has to make choices, that will inevitably alienate some. I don't know why they went for the flat refund, but, if you think about it, they already refunded us by doubling ip gains. You may think, "How is this?" Well, they removed pretty much half of the ip sink, without increasing champion prices or reducing blue essence gains. So it means we now need roughly half of the amount we needed before to buy the buyable. So it means we'll need half of the time we needed (as a new player), which is easily translatable with "doubling ip gains". Yes, it's definitely for newer players, but, as I said, they have to make this kind of choices sometimes.
: im just going to downvote this post because i dont want to see another runes reforge post on the front page
: So adding all new champs and ip gain being the same for years is balanced for both? I really wish u people would stop acting like this is a horrible refund rate and if we allow this they can keep on doing stupid shit
That's not what I meant with balance. Let's make an example: Let's say all the champions together cost 50000 ip. Then let's say all the runes together also cost 50000 ip. So it means that, to buy all the buyable with ip, you need 100000 ip. Then let's say Riot wants to make it a fair, not too short, not too long, grind, and wants you to get all the ip you need in 100 games. So it puts 1000 ip gain per game. What I'm saying is that Riot first created the shop, then decided the ip gain per match accordingly, not the other way around. With the new change Riot's not gonna increase prices or reduce average gains, but the shop is gonna get half of what it had until now. Instead of 100000 ip, you'll now need only half of it, 50000. It basically means that they already refunded you by pretty much doubling the effective ip gain (since you need half the time to buy everything). This is what so many people fail to see. So asking for ANOTHER refund on top of it is moot.
Rioter Comments
Ray29x (EUW)
: Here's the problem: i already farmed for all the runes i needed. They aren't annoying anymore. They're just wasted IP now. I don't like em cos i hade to waste a lot of IP. And now they're giving me shitty % of refund on something i never wanted to buy but i basically had to. JUST GIVE ME BACK AT LEAST 50% OF THE ORIGINAL PRICE FFS
Then you should cheer that no one is ever going to deal with the shit you've dealt again.
: I think we've had our fill of hyper mobile damage champs
{{item:3070}} {{champion:516}} {{item:3070}}
: You forgot to mention the part where we have to endure a balance nightmare for 3 months. Honestly though 100 BE (ex IP) for each rune is ridiculous considering how much they used to cost, quints were like 2k, for a full set of quints it was the same as a new champ.
Being cyclically unbalanced is the reason the game is so good, though. Trust me, a balanced game that gets patched every 4 months is the most boring shit you can find.
Leonerdo (NA)
: I don't think it's an unpopular sentiment. But that's not to say that it is the only right opinion either. I'm pretty sure all sides are entirely valid. Let me break the opinions into a few categories: 1. The people who are content with the refund constitute the majority of players, who have been playing for a long time and gotten a lot of good use out of their runes already. 2. The people who bought their runes this Season are getting a full refund, so they are obviously content. 3. The people who wasted IP on useless runes, or bought runes **right before** the start of the season, or bought niche runes (like spellvamp quints) that they haven't used much yet -- they are the ones complaining. And they have every right to, since comparatively they are getting much less value out of their runes (either from using them or from IP refunds) than the first two categories. Of course, the only way for Riot to fix this is to make an increasingly complex refund plan, to try and satisfy more categories of players while keeping the refund fair for each one. (Before someone suggests it, full refunds for everyone would still be unfairly beneficial to the first category who already got adequate value out of using their runes. On top of that, they are less in need of IP/BE; they are probably already sitting on 20k IP.)
Ok, but even group 3 people aren't losing anything. Let's say I am from that group, and I'm going to get a 15% effective refund. Why should I be upset that someone else got a 80% effective refund? Why should I care? We both earned something, I earned less, but we're still in positive. What is the actual point, envy? If it is envy, then it's obviously not a good reason to complain.
: Can u people stop acting like ip is free it takes time to get it and time is money
But you would have gotten those ip anyway, since you get them just by playing. You didn't have to go out of your way to SPECIFICALLY get ip to buy runes.
Ray29x (EUW)
: i always felt that runes where an annoying thing i had to farm to be relevant and when i was farming them i was thinking how they made the game unbalanced by being so high in price (both runes and runepages) and i never liked farming for them, and i never liked them. so, you see how i can be upset about the refund price of something basically mandatory that i never liked?
How can you be upset? Something you hated is now gone and you don't have to deal with it anymore. You should cheer instead!
: In the current state of the game, at any point over the 25-ish minute mark, it is one mistake and it's over due to how easy structures are to destroy. I'd personally enjoy having games last 35-40 minutes, so I'm a bit biased, but I don't think increasing passive gold without massively buffing objectives is a good way to go.
Ok, but we were talking about the consequences of lowering passive gold, not the other way around. Lowering it would increase snowball and not reduce it, like it was assumed before.
Ray29x (EUW)
: well, you BUY pack with gold.
Which I "earned" just by playing the game, without any special effort. Just like ip, which are a side consequence of playing games in LoL. I didn't go out of my way to earn neither gold in HS, nor ip in LoL.
Fefnil (EUW)
: To everyone upset with the rune refund
Don't be prideful, people.
Lakrosin (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Fefnil,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=OaV2bAVk,comment-id=000500000000,timestamp=2017-09-02T02:20:55.829+0000) > > Not always. If you give leveling bonus to new players, then inevitably level 30 players are going to complain if they don't get those bonuses. It already happened. > Even with the new level uncapped system, I alreadt saw many posts complaining about the "shame" of starting at 30 and having to end up at a lower level than a new player just because he played more than you in the first month of season 8. What bonuses? All they are doing is giving back the IP they had previously. It's not like they are introducing some new IP to destroy a MMORPG market or something that will make the prices inflate. Yes, you can buy champs with RP. But, the wiser people would most likely go for skins if they are actually going to play that long to make that purchase valuable.
> [{quoted}](name=Lakrosin,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=OaV2bAVk,comment-id=0005000000000000,timestamp=2017-09-02T02:22:39.095+0000) > > What bonuses? > > All they are doing is giving back the IP they had previously. It's not like they are introducing some new IP to destroy a MMORPG market or something that will make the prices inflate. I was talking about the leveling up rewards introruced in the Garena server some months ago. They didn't give these to people who already levelled up, and there obviously were people who complained. What you're saying is true, but without runes, there's not much you can buy anyway. With higher refunds, they would basically give you at least 10 free champions, on top of the ones who are going to be more easily available with the revamped blue essence system.
Lakrosin (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Fefnil,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=OaV2bAVk,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2017-09-02T02:13:58.623+0000) > > Well, then look at the most simple reason: this is catering to new players. The more players LoL takes, the more it's gonna live throughout the years, the more we're gonna enjoy it. Most people fail to realize that in a game like this, **majority > minority**... I think you fail to realize you can do both.
> [{quoted}](name=Lakrosin,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=OaV2bAVk,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2017-09-02T02:16:09.878+0000) > > I think you fail to realize you can do both. Not always. If you give leveling bonus to new players, then inevitably level 30 players are going to complain if they don't get those bonuses. It already happened. Even with the new level uncapped system, I already saw many posts complaining about the "shame" of starting at 30 and having to end up at a lower level than a new player just because he played more than you in the first month of season 8. People are going to complain if something hurts their pride, even if doing it it's going to hurt them more in the long run.
Fefnil (EUW)
: To everyone upset with the rune refund
Well, then look at the most simple reason: this is catering to new players. The more players LoL takes, the more it's gonna live throughout the years, the more we're gonna enjoy it. Most people fail to realize that in a game like this, majority > minority even for your own sake, since if the company goes red just to be loyal to the veterans, those very veterans are going to lose the game they love the most just because of their own pride. Runes did more than you think. By gathering your attention towards the runes, they could keep champion prices that way and allow for a fair stream of rp income outside cosmetics. They are going to give a low refund, sure, but as a compensation they are going to keep champion prices that way. Remember that they still haven't found an effective ip sink, and with the new change they are going to lose half of the current ip sink and a not-tiny chunk of the current rp income. It's already a risk by itself on their side. Throwing a lot more ip into the current situation is not the smartest idea.
Rioter Comments
: Honestly this is idiotic. The point here is that I (and many others) worked tirelessly to farm up the IP (and RP in some cases) for those runes/pages only to have them just handed out to everyone. Those rune pages used to confer a very slight advantage to really dedicated veteran players at a frankly massive time investment cost, which I was more than willing to pay because I loved the game. Now, literally anyone who can think up a unique summoner name is literally on par with me despite having only just created their account, and this is simply not fair. It is a forced casualization of the game, and to argue my point is simply a failure to grasp that basic concept.
You didn't farm IP. No one ever farmed IP. You see, "farming" is a term used to address a repetitive process that is needed to accumulate currency, gaining experience, or anything else and its ultimate purpose is to reach a new stage of power to help you in the actual game, and it's a process that you wouldn't do if not for this reason. Farming is when in an RPG you go in a map full of easy-medium enemies and repeatedly kill them to level up. Are you still going to do it after you reach level cap? Definitely not. Farming is when in an RPG you go in a specific place and do a particular trick to quickly earn large amounts of game currency. Are you still going to do it after you get all the money you need? Definitely not. In League of Legends, you get IP by doing games (which is the only thing you can do), and with these IP you buy runes to help you win more easily. Are you still going to play after you buy all runes? YES, BECAUSE THAT'S THE REASON YOU DID IT IN THE FIRST PLACE. Gaining IP to buy runes is not and never will be farming in LoL, simply because you do what you're supposed to do anyway. You didn't farm anything, simply because you would have done all those games even if there wasn't a rune system in the first place. So it means you got them WHILE playing, as a side gift. No one plays with the only purpose to farm IP, because IP help you become stronger in those exact same games, and if you didn't want to do them in the first place, then you would have never started farming IP.
Eedat (NA)
: ***
I signed in back in season 2, and I agree with him. Why do you need so much this refund? If nothing had changed, you would still have the runes and the ip you spent would still be lost forever. And in addition there would also be some runes left to buy (if you have any). Im any case, you would never get those ip back anyway but, after the change, you will have ALL the runes free. If you already had all the runes, then you simply gain nothing nor lose anything. In other words, you would lose more by actually keeping the current system. In addition to thjs, they are also prone to give us a refund: the flat amount is definitely not the smartest idea, but we don't know the rationale behind that. If it's simply laziness, well, shame on them, but still you lose nothing out of this. You may say: "But I could have spent those ip on other things". Well, you used thise runes. If you bought them just as a collector then you should already know the risks of collectionism, that everyone accepts. If not, you still used them. Riot is not taking them away from you, since they are deleting them all and substitute with an equal, free system. So where's the problem? As I said, those ip you spent, at the end of the day, would still be lost to you. You would never get to use them anyway.
Ray29x (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Limrick,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xs7dFWns,comment-id=0000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-09-01T20:36:46.306+0000) > > That's on YOU, not Riot. IP boosts are completely optional, hell, **_so are runes_**. > hahahahahahahahahahahaha oh wait, you're serious. let me laugh even harder. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHA boy i got harrassed and flamed the first time i got into ranked with incomplete runes... i got rekt because early game advantage thanks to the runes. saying that you can play league without buying runes is like saying you can play hearthstone without buying card packs...
I do, I played Heartstone without buying packs with real money, just grinded gold, bought packs, disenchanted, crafted cards, made a deck up to ranks 6-15 for a couple of seasons back in the day. Don't tell me you also think you can't play Clash of Clans or Clash Royale without buying gems?
Sunibee (NA)
: These Refund numbers are DISGUSTING
You are right. We should get 12% refund for every rune instead. What are these 30, 50, 100% pesky refunds?
Rioter Comments
Birbonius (EUW)
: "kayle ulting your target" i think i was clear enough. What i meant is "don't worry,there are plenty more ways other than playing GP and Trynd to counter your ultimate". And in a real situation yeah,it's basically impossible to have a shield big enough to save you,but there is in fact a "damage limit" on urgot's execution. As i said: Vandiril. Check it out.
That limit is no more. Some Rioter said they increased it (to 1 million if I remember correctly) since they hadn't effectively thought about Tahm's edge case. Truth be said, a reaaaaaaally stacked up Cho'Gath or Sion can still save themselves and other people with the Locket, but it's a number virtually impossible to reach. Even if someone wanted to test it out in a not-Practice mode, minions will scale up way faster than you to reach that point. And I don't think it's even reachable in Practice mode since the 1 hour time limit.
: As a side effect, it helps to end games faster by allowing people to reach late game faster.
Yes, that's true, but it's a healthy way to shorten game, reducing overall development of the power curve. On the other hand, hard snowballing makes it so you need to make one mistake and then it's over. It's better to simply accelerate the game, just like ARAM now, for example, than force stomps.
: All y'all motherf*ckers complaining about Mord's visuals, but look at this 2009, dirty ass, shit in a robe lookin' bastard http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/leagueoflegends/images/f/fa/Udyr_Render.png/revision/latest?cb=20141114134045 He is honestly one of my favorite champions, and i would one trick him if only I didn't have to pay 40$ on every account i made
Wait, didn't he get a VU a while ago? https://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/leagueoflegends/images/b/b4/Udyr_SpiritGuardSkin.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20170621034312 K
: I would also slow down the gold per second... it was increased a while ago, and players who haven't even farmed can access the items by CSing poorly. That shut down gold? Killer's only if you ask me, as it was once before. I do disagree about the "Baron stronger", removing the global gold and reducing gold per second you are forcing the players to CS better, and there's less gold available, effectively making everything else stronger because your items are not that powerful. Anyway... I loved Season 3, it should have remained like that if you ask me!.
Actually, reducing ambient gold increases snowballing, it doesn't reduce it. Think about this: let's say we get 1 gold per second, and killing someone gives you 500 gold. If I do it, how big is my boost? It's very big, since I earn 8 minutes worth of gold. If, instead, we get 100 gold per second, and killing someone still gives you 500 gold, is it still the same boost as before? Definitely not, since I only get 5 seconds worth of gold. It's pretty much a waste of time. So more ambient gold actually helps who's behind more than who's ahead.
: "CDR is too broadly found"- Meddler
{{item:3070}} {{champion:30}} {{item:3070}} {{item:3027}} {{item:3116}} {{item:3151}} {{item:3020}} {{item:3089}} {{item:3135}}
Saïx (OCE)
: Am I imagining things, or is Baron a bit... easy?
- Baron Nashor applies Grievous Wounds for 1 second to whoever damages him or gets damaged by him. Fixed
: I think Riot forgot that AP is suposed to be a cheaper stat than AD
On the other hand, when in ARAM I get a tank and the enemy team is full AD I am unkillable, while if it's full AP I get melted no matters how much MR I build.
: > [{quoted}](name=Fefnil,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=GKzHVR7B,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2017-08-09T17:42:39.794+0000) > > Which is a nonsense motivation since no one said to substitue chronological view with discussion view... In the other boards you can simply switch between them anytime, so if you want chronological you can just keep it... The reason why this board doesn't have both is because the two views don't play nicely with each other. When somebody replies to another person in discussion view, you can not see who is replying to who when you switch to chronological mode. An exception to this is if the quote button in discussion is clicked (instead of reply), but almost everybody clicks reply because there's practically no reason to ever quote somebody in discussion view since all replies are nested.
> [{quoted}](name=Tundra Fizz,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=GKzHVR7B,comment-id=00000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-08-09T17:47:45.363+0000) > > The reason why this board doesn't have both is because the two views don't play nicely with each other. When somebody replies to another person in discussion view, you can not see who is replying to who when you switch to chronological mode. > > An exception to this is if the quote button in discussion is clicked (instead of reply), but almost everybody clicks reply because there's practically no reason to ever quote somebody in discussion view since all replies are nested. That's a good point. I guess it's fine like this, then.
Arioch (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Fefnil,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=GKzHVR7B,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2017-08-08T12:02:11.192+0000) > > I'm sorry if it sounded like that, but I'm not trolling... I'm not aware of the wars between boards, I only look at the Hot section in the Home, so anything from any board is good for me. I simply started seeing more and more threads coming from GD, but this is the only board where you can't switch view, so I was genuinely wondering why all this excitement now, since I saw many threads that could be posted in other boards but they have something more than this one, the discussion view, which many people find better. > I mean, if you have the choice, why would you post in a board that offers less visual conveniences? this board doesnt have discussion view because its shit reddit garbage we dont want it and never will
I agree with these explanations about why chronological view gives equal weight, the problem is that that's not my point. It's a nonsense motivation since no one said to substitute chronological view with discussion view... In the other boards you can simply switch between them anytime, so if you want chronological you can just keep it... Which view is better is simply a subjective matter, so everyone can say his opinion about it, but what the other boards offer is the CHOICE to read in both views, which is clearly better than force one view. Even if chronological was objectively the better view without any doubt, offering the choice would still be way better than force only one.
: > [{quoted}](name=Fefnil,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=GKzHVR7B,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2017-08-08T12:23:42.665+0000) > > What? "Things that are League related that could be posted on other boards" Keyword is could. GD may or may not bring up League, there's no strict rule for or against it. And given that, it's not weird that a small minority of threads here end up being exclusively League related. Most people on here view it in "recent" view to treat it like a discussion board so the Hot Threads are usually League related since that's something the other boards care about. I think the idea that we shouldn't be allowed to discuss League on this board which is designed to be able to talk about w/e when we're all League players in some manner is silly
> [{quoted}](name=TwitchInMyPants,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=GKzHVR7B,comment-id=000400000000,timestamp=2017-08-08T12:29:47.082+0000) > > "Things that are League related that could be posted on other boards" > > Keyword is could. GD may or may not bring up League, there's no strict rule for or against it. And given that, it's not weird that a small minority of threads here end up being exclusively League related. Most people on here view it in "recent" view to treat it like a discussion board so the Hot Threads are usually League related since that's something the other boards care about. > > I think the idea that we shouldn't be allowed to discuss League on this board which is designed to be able to talk about w/e when we're all League players in some manner is silly Of course you can decide in which board to post, since GD overlaps with all the others (even if, for "fair play", they should not overlap and make GD not LoL related, but that's not the problem). What I wonder, though, is why would you choose GD when, here, you force people to look at the comments in chronological view, while in other boards they can choose between chronological and discussion view. I mean, when I post something, I want the most people possible to notice it. And it's clearly easier in a boards that offers more, no? Statistically, here in GD only people that like chronological view will look at my post, while in, for example, M&G, both people that like chronological and people that like discussion view will take a look. The more people there are, the more likely my post is gonna be read, right?
: Pool Party Ahri!
Well, actually Pool Party Ahri already exists, it's here in the background: http://www.mobafire.com/images/champion/skins/landscape/ziggs-pool-party.jpg And Pool Party skins always had this feature to include other Pool Party skins in them, even if they're not released yet.
: Believe it or not the people on the League of Legends General Discussion boards may have played League of Legends before *GASP*
> [{quoted}](name=TwitchInMyPants,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=GKzHVR7B,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2017-08-08T12:08:43.835+0000) > > Believe it or not the people on the League of Legends General Discussion boards may have played League of Legends before > > *GASP* What?
Arioch (NA)
: nice bait now get out me board
> [{quoted}](name=Arioch,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=GKzHVR7B,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-08-08T11:48:32.607+0000) > > nice bait now get out me board I'm sorry if it sounded like that, but I'm not trolling... I'm not aware of the wars between boards, I only look at the Hot section in the Home, so anything from any board is good for me. I simply started seeing more and more threads coming from GD, but this is the only board where you can't switch view, so I was genuinely wondering why all this excitement now, since I saw many threads that could be posted in other boards but they have something more than this one, the discussion view, which many people find better. I mean, if you have the choice, why would you post in a board that offers less visual conveniences?
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: Corki needs to be nerfed
How do you find it impossible to itemize against Corki? 90% of his damage is magic...
: Boot enchantments Idea
In my opinion, the problems with enchantments rise when you give them combat power, where they pretty much become keystone masteries. The problem with old enchantment was that there wasn't actually a choice. You pretty much picked the enchantment based on the champ you were playing. Also, it pretty much felt like a chore to buy it. The old enchantments were really cost inefficient, but because you had the opportunity to buy it, you were also forced to buy it. Pretty much the same problem as the old Eleisa's Blessing (RIP). So, in my opinion, enchantments should give out of combat utility. Things that are not really required, and are conveniences more than real upgrades. For these reasons, I think the PinkSlot is a very good candidate as an enchantment. The CreepBlock is okay-ish, maybe potentially too much impactful during fights. If I had to suggest other enchantments, mmh... let's see: Maybe an enchantment that enlarges your vision radius when you are out of combat for at least 7-8 seconds. Or maybe one that enlarges your vision radius if you stay still for at least 5 seconds or so. There could also be an enchantment that lets you store elixirs in the same way as PinkSlot, so when you are full build you are not forced to activate it in base. Also an enchantment that reduces your recall cast time by 0.5-1 seconds.
: I cannot stand my brother's girlfriend because of her eating habits
: Why the assassin rework was unfair
On the other hand they have the best mobility in game class wise, or at least this is the current concept design. Even if it's delayed and other classes have an instant burst, they can't still be compared, since they can literally jump around and dodge everything while killing you, while Lux can't. That's the reason why assassin is the most mechanically intensive class and one of the most difficult decision making ones.
Show more

Fefnil

Level 30 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion