: I bet the downvote bot boy can't make the entire New page red.
If you don't like red, you should come to the french boards. Here, everything is green! Well, almost everything.
: Upon further review of this case, the moderators have determined that your thread was a continuation of problematic behaviour on the Boards. The specific thread in question contained a message, spelled out through the first letter of each sentence: > "La modération se fout de notre gueule" which as you know, means "Moderation doesn't care about us", but in more disrespectful way. In conclusion, the thread was disrespectful and was posted in the wrong sub-board. The suspension was applied after years of prior history of problematic behaviour. I appreciate you reaching out on the North American Boards, and I hope I was able to resolve your inquiry regarding the French Boards. Hopefully, the French moderators will be able to address your inquiries directly in the near future. Have a good day!
> In conclusion, the thread was disrespectful and was posted in the wrong sub-board. The suspension was applied after years of prior history of problematic behaviour. Hi Wuks, I'm a former mod of the french boards, and I personaly applied some of the suspensions mentionned, most noting being the (what was supposed to be) one-month ban for the "son of a bitch". I'd just like to add some perspective over those "years of prior history of problematic behaviour", as I was on the mod side at that time about two/three years ago. Most of DearPear's "problematic behaviour" was unfairly handled. To sum it up, one moderator in the team had something against DearPear, and whenever he came (once every six months), DP was banned. The bans were quickly reverted, of course, but there was (is?) no way to mark them as "unfair and shouldn't be taken into consideration". More, like you're probably aware of it, there was no way to actually unban someone, the only way to do so was to ban him for one hour, which reduced the ban to one hour. But it still appears on moderation history as a "ban", not as an "unban" (we marked them as such in the comments, but... Who reads those?). So, each time he was unfairly punished, there were two more bans on the history that **he didn't deserve**. There was also that time where a moderator misunderstood him (This time it wasn't malicious it was a legit mistake). Two more "unfair bans". There was also that time where he came to me to tell me he found a possible weak point in the ban system and asked me to ban him for a day so he could test it, after which I reverted the ban to a one hour again. That's two more. Etc. In total, I think that the only action on his account that is justified (at least was when I left the program a year ago) is the one month ban mentionned earlier. Other than that, DearPear clearly was never a problematic member.
: Why Lux... just why is she in league? like other champions like Yasuo or Zoe. why?
Death Rex (EUW)
: > We broke it down like this: ranked games should be a matter of public record, unranked should be visible to you and your friends, and customs are just for you. You can read that announcement here: http://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/news/game-updates/features/announcing-new-match-history-beta. The link isn't working for me, it just says Error 404. Could it just be because I'm from EUW or...?
> [{quoted}](name=Death Rex,realm=EUW,application-id=A7LBtoKc,discussion-id=V0BgNcOQ,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2017-08-18T20:41:08.573+0000) > > The link isn't working for me, it just says Error 404. Could it just be because I'm from EUW or...? Remove the . at the end of the URL and it should work
: No, not EVERY stat. We won't include a -% time dead rune, for example. Many stats will be reflected again in the new runes system though. AD (by way of Adaptive) is there, but also Armor, MR, and CDR we've already previewed. Not every stat will come back in the same form (see: Overcharger with CDR), but we'd definitely like to get back any stats that created interesting decision making. We're trying out AS and early %MS runes internally, for example, and figuring out where they fit.
> [{quoted}](name=Riot Reinboom,realm=NA,application-id=A7LBtoKc,discussion-id=MZd3jemX,comment-id=000f0000,timestamp=2017-07-05T21:42:55.373+0000) > > No, not EVERY stat. We won't include a -% time dead rune, for example. Indirect nerf to intentionnal feeders, nice!
Wrekzzz (NA)
: You get a free pair of Boots of Speed with an extra benefit on them, you have to upgrade them yourself but they keep the extra movement speed.
What happens if my inventory is full at 10 minutes?
: Replays are Live in the New Client!: FAQ & Pro-Tips
What does .rofl stands for? Replay Of a Freaking Legend?
: 1. https://twitter.com/RiotLyte/status/695129287578382336 2. http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/developer-corner/XvqbAgrF-lets-talk-about-dynamic-queues-and-ranked-play 3. https://twitter.com/RiotLyte/status/712404646313238529?lang=de 4. all his Statistics are Bullshit! i was never asked! 5.Tribunal comes back lie 6. Toxic Community will reform .... LMAO because if im toxic and get a Ban i go and great me a FUCKING NEW ACC... that being said BANS are useless! 7. to be continued....
> [{quoted}](name=4 Faker,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=yuhgGn46,comment-id=0004000000000000,timestamp=2016-05-10T09:13:46.187+0000) > > 1. https://twitter.com/RiotLyte/status/695129287578382336 It was true. The poll said 60% DynamicQueue for 40% SoloQueue. And when it was shown, a lot of people on Reddit tried their hardest to reverse it. > 2. http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/developer-corner/XvqbAgrF-lets-talk-about-dynamic-queues-and-ranked-play No lie in there. > 3. https://twitter.com/RiotLyte/status/712404646313238529?lang=de What tell you it's a lie? > 4. all his Statistics are Bullshit! i was never asked! You obviously don't know how statistics works, right? > 5.Tribunal comes back lie Still in the tube. > 6. Toxic Community will reform .... LMAO because if im toxic and get a Ban i go and great me a FUCKING NEW ACC... that being said BANS are useless! I... No, really, if I answer that, I'll get angry.
: he said Soloq will come out and then later said that was a lie - to the whole playerbase worldwide.
> [{quoted}](name=Drunken Yasuo,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=yuhgGn46,comment-id=0004000000000001,timestamp=2016-05-10T09:15:40.070+0000) > > he said Soloq will come out and then later said that was a lie - to the whole playerbase worldwide. ... He said it MIGHT not come back. But they're still trying to figure a way to make it come back.
: yup! he was the Lead liar of this liar company!
> [{quoted}](name=4 Faker,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=yuhgGn46,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2016-05-10T08:46:48.438+0000) > > yup! he was the Lead liar of this liar company! Really? When did he lie?
Lyte (NA)
: Goodbye for now, Riot Games
:( As someone who loved seeing your posts and statistics, As someone who liked your personnality and your way to use maths, As someone who saw first-hand what you did to the game, Thank you for everything. I wish you the best of luck in your future.
Drehirth (NA)
: I actually see this as a big injustice wow.. - he leveled his new account on stream - gets trolled every single game by both teams(but /mutes all when it happens) - has other streamers get jealous of his popularity shit talk him all day(and yet avoids the drama himself maturely and tells people to stop posting about it on his channel) but he gets the ban instead. Why now? He got most popular after he made a hype video about being a better player, but people claim he gets popular off of trolling. People are allowed to shit talk him all day, and yet even despite avoiding the drama he gets banned now? Seriously? The self righteous people will claim he's a troll etc and downvote to hell, but this was pretty damn stupid. edit: wow the post wasn't suppose to get that much attention. Here's some final thoughts though. Have received dozens of responses from either agreeing or disagreeing with mild to extreme toxicity both on the forums and people adding me in game. I would just like to say that regardless of your opinion, I had shown nothing but logic in my post and I find it disgusting that other people both try to take a moral high ground by judging tyler as a person and then extend that hate to anybody who even considers it a questionable timing. The other thing to keep in mind is that neither side should care anymore at this point. Have you seen his reaction to the ban? It was pretty funny, and not because he baby raged. If you are a fan, you shouldn't care because he doesn't care enough to If you hate him you also shouldn't care because you are only adding to his popularity
> [{quoted}](name=Drehirth,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=8a75KeUR,comment-id=006e,timestamp=2016-04-30T01:54:48.888+0000) > > - gets trolled every single game by both teams(but /mutes all when it happens) ... You're not serious, are you? > He got most popular after he made a hype video about being a better player, but people claim he gets popular off of trolling. Ah, yeah, you're serious. Now let me laugh even harder. Tyler1 IS toxic. I've watched him many times because I wanted to make my own opinion, and he is definitely toxic.
: What does Riot mean to you?
: Being banned for toxicity doesn't strip season rewards. The only way that happens is if he was Elo boosted or was Elo boosting.
> [{quoted}](name=Neo Cyrus,realm=NA,application-id=LqLKtMpN,discussion-id=lX8NqEAl,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2015-02-03T10:34:48.863+0000) > > Being banned for toxicity doesn't strip season rewards. The only way that happens is if he was Elo boosted or was Elo boosting. Talking about extreme toxicity, not "casual" toxicity. http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/miscellaneous/Tw3K6XXu-ranked-rewards-and-negative-behavior
: > [{quoted}](name=Max Nobody,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=wN0qalc9,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2015-02-03T09:52:31.281+0000) > > http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/NA1/1718616082/33728144?tab=overview > > Yeah, you didn't afk, you just got crushed by your matchup, that's why your level 5 with 14 cs in 36 minutes. > > Yeah, your Spellthief Panth deserve to be at least Diamond IV. You're quick to nit-pick a singular game. I checked the rest of his recent match history and he seems to do a relatively good job of being there in his games. Stop pretending like being afk for one game justifies any sort of restrictions on anyone.
> [{quoted}](name=AtrocityEyes,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=wN0qalc9,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2015-02-03T10:08:52.961+0000) > > You're quick to nit-pick a singular game. I checked the rest of his recent match history and he seems to do a relatively good job of being there in his games. Stop pretending like being afk for one game justifies any sort of restrictions on anyone. Ok. http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/NA1/1717569980/33728144?tab=overview Level 6 in 28 minutes. Special mention to two games : http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/NA1/1715095049/33728144 http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/NA1/1707073220/33728144 FYI, the oldest game is from the 01/24. Like, a week ago. And I didn't got into the details to see if he afk'ed during the game then reconnected for example.
: If you had the chance to meet the troller from your last game....
... Are you guys REALLY saying you'd be willing to send someone to the hospital, or, even worse, breaking several of his bones, just because he trolled you once in a VIDEO GAME?
Eilynne (NA)
: Reports from Premade groups
> First: Those pre-game demands. If I had a dollar for every time a duo premade in draft or ranked demanded they get bot lane, simply because they were premade; regardless of them being last pick. Add in 2 more to that group, and you better have been planning to fill since the get-go, because if you don't, after the game they will... Well, you know, you should let them and, you know, fill. I always fill, even though I say I prefer support, if someone else wants it, I give it. Usually it will result in a much nicer game. > Second: ...report you. The beauty of being premade, is that you have not only one, but a possible 3 other report-ers. Let's be honest, more often than not, if one member of a premade gets heated and swears they are reporting, so do his friends. Speaking personally, I am MUCH more likely to report someone for an offense if they've ticked off someone I queued with (granted, in my case, they have to have actually done something legitimately wrong -- i.e. trash talking someone in the game, be it my duo or someone else). Having said that, I really don't think my report along with my duo partner's should carry as much weight as someone solo queue who gives the same report. The number of games where you've been reported have more value than the number of reports in a single game.
: last season my rank level is gold V but now i lost all of reward ,my skin,
Have you been banned for 14 days due to extreme toxicity?
: It's a great time to quit League of Legends
http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/NA1/1718616082/33728144?tab=overview Yeah, you didn't afk, you just got crushed by your matchup, that's why your level 5 with 14 cs in 36 minutes. Yeah, your Spellthief Panth deserve to be at least Diamond IV.
: If you read the post, you'd see I have 52% winrate across 700 games. But apparently the system is extremely punishing on losing streaks and doesn't reward winning streaks, so w/e
> [{quoted}](name=Austinodood,realm=NA,application-id=cIfEodbz,discussion-id=ErOksjQR,comment-id=00030001,timestamp=2014-12-24T18:02:14.987+0000) > > If you read the post, you'd see I have 52% winrate across 700 games. But apparently the system is extremely punishing on losing streaks and doesn't reward winning streaks, so w/e If you read my answer, you'd see that, at a point, you were playing with Diamond 5 players (which mean Your ELO = Your League ELO), and had a 5 lose streak. So, your "streaking score" is at -5. Then you had a 4 lose streak without having a winning streak, putting it to -9. Then a 3 lose streak without having a winning streak, putting it to -12. So, at this point, you were playing with Plat 3 players. Then you finnaly had your 5 win streak, putting your "streaking score" to -12 + 5 = -7. Streaking score negative = You play with lower ELO players = You win less LP and you lose more. (Note : You're still playing with Platinum 2 players.)
: Won 5 in a row, ended up at 55 LP. Lost 2, ended up at 5 LP.
You're Diamond 5, but you're playing with Platinum 2. The system thinks you belong to a lower tier, maybe due to a big losing streak. Starting 25 days ago, you had a 5 loss losing streak, then a 4 loss streak, then a 3 loss streak, without you having a winning streak. So, you barely won for your first losing streak.
: Thank you, Lyte
> [{quoted}](name=ShadowKnight1224,realm=NA,application-id=cIfEodbz,discussion-id=zGUEt0Ha,comment-id=,timestamp=2014-08-19T01:23:57.995+0000) > > I am an avid follower fo the Red Tracker, and it just warms my heart to see Lyte's posts. I've been in the gamer community for years, and it's become an exercise in developing a thick skin and trying to ignore the slurs thrown about like candy. I've been disappointed by one of the servers of a game I used to play, who was strict with slurs until one day they were like 'homophobic slurs are fine actually, people use them all the time so it's really silly to ban them in the first place', which felt like a slap to the face. And here I read the Red Tracker daily and see Lyte just refusing to cave in to the entitlement of the toxic portion of the player base. That makes me feel that, instead of being forgotten or grudgingly tolerated, people like me *matter* to Riot, that we are just as important to them as anybody else. > > So thank you, Lyte and co., for working hard to make a safer and less toxic community for everyone to play in. You, sir, wrote aloud what I think silently.
Dedrius (NA)
: Should be an option to abort a game in champ select with at least 4 votes on one team
"Oh, you play TF jungle? K, all vote yes or report." "You picked Poppy? All vote yes or I troll". "God, Fizz, my counter, all vote yes or it's freelose" SO. MANY. FLAWS. (Oh and what about premades and DuoQ?)
: Where are Tribunal reports going?
Hi there, doesn't know if this has been posted before, but I just want a confirmation, I hope from a Red (again, if it has been answered before, I'm sorry) We at the French EUW Tribunal Forum, were told that, behind every case of chat restriction or ranked ban, someone at Riot Games checks it before the player is punished. I made some calculations and concluded that it was possible (Don't ask me for them, they are as flawed as a conspiracy theory, I need to remake it), but I'd like to confirm : Is it true?
: Disco Viktor
http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130914012346/cardfight/images/f/fc/Shut-Up-And-Take-My-Money-1024x1280.jpg
: Rito police
> because ive had a chat bann one after another after another since january Wait, you mean you had a restriction before it was even created?
Raptamei (NA)
: Too late, Sona is useless now.
> [{quoted}](name=Raptamei,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6oAU0rWs,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2014-12-11T22:46:01.867+0000) > Too late, Sona is useless now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FopyRHHlt3M
: Rek'sai, what makes her size increase?
Parkerrr (NA)
: A solutions to disconnects and quitters!
: These types of online contracts are typically only valid for the intellectual copyrights; however, in this contemporary society where the majority of social interactions take place digitally, a strong case can be made for what I will dub "naturalized online citizens" and their right to access online communities to which they are socially acquainted while it still exists. When someone makes a digital purchase, it is generally with the expectation of continued access to such content; however, players who have extenuating circumstances which may cause them to forcibly leave a match, are now at risk of discriminatory queues or denial of access to service which they may be socially reliant upon. **I strongly feel that this new leaver system is predatory in nature, aimed at denying access to customers who may be considered "undesirable."**
> [{quoted}](name=DoinitSlow,realm=NA,application-id=cIfEodbz,discussion-id=9tjUrlf5,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2014-12-11T14:37:45.033+0000) > These types of online contracts are typically only valid for the intellectual copyrights; however, in this contemporary society where the majority of social interactions take place digitally, a strong case can be made for what I will dub "naturalized online citizens" and their right to access online communities to which they are socially acquainted while it still exists. When someone makes a digital purchase, it is generally with the expectation of continued access to such content; however, players who have extenuating circumstances which may cause them to forcibly leave a match, are now at risk of discriminatory queues or denial of access to service which they may be socially reliant upon. **I strongly feel that this new leaver system is predatory in nature, aimed at denying access to customers who may be considered "undesirable."** First, yes, leavers are "undesirable". But you will only be struck with a sanction if you really leave way too often. Second, you did not bought the game. Third, it was noted in ToU you agreed upon you HAD to have a connexion and a computer good enough to play without disturbing your teammates.
K1dFrost (NA)
: Bye
Byyye! Send us a postcard! (Oh and if you're switching to Heartstone, forget your credit card)
: Leaver System Unfair
> Let it be known that I was under duress when I typed "I Agree" in accordance with the new Leaver Buster system and is therefore not admissible as evidence in a civil court. Let it be known that Riot doesn't sue their players for leaving games. If you had to type "I agree", it's just to make sure you have read the message. > Furthermore, let it be known that if I am denied equal access or am kept from accessing my purchased digital goods and services without appropriate recompense, that I will initiate a class-action lawsuit aimed to recover damages from online gaming services who have denied access to purchased digital goods and services from their customers without recourse, and for the emotional and psychological damages caused by such actions Can you read the ToU again? > Furthermore, compensation for time spent to gain competitive knowledge would be sought, since a coerced switch to a different online gaming service would require another significant time investment. ... Wait what. >If you have been negatively impacted by such systems without recourse, please comment with your specific situation below. Profiteering companies such as Riot, Blizzard, S2, BioWare, etc have created digital communities in which they have the sole authority to guide the aforementioned communities morally by holding your digital purchases hostage, while having no regard for civil law or even criminal law in some cases. ... In english, please? God, my brain hurt. OK, the popup you had just tells you "there is a system that punishes afk/leavers, so you'd better avoid it". THAT'S ALL. If you leave a second time there won't be any sanction, there will ony be one if you leave too often.
: Basic Attacking Dragon
Why? It's good as it is.
: Fixing the AFK problem
Wait, you mean you'll ask to some people "Hey, look, here's a match with Ezreal, but he fuk'd up with his runes/masteries so he has tanky runes/masteries, and went 0/6 before afk'ing. Oh and he start Sunfire. Do you want to risk your LPs playing this game?" and expect them to answer "Hell yeah bro'!" Plus, what happens if he reconnects?
Naethmor (NA)
: Why don't people like being carried
You never play ranked. Thus, you play mode people play to have fun. They don't want to be "carried", they want to play.
: Riot? Can you not? This 'Dark Horse' shit is stupid af.
Report Kikis for TF Jungle. I mean, man. It's just giving ideas on how to break the meta. I saw a Jungle Irelia and it was, like... Well... You see Warwick? Add more tankiness and you've got Junglia. Also, Support Brand is as broken as Support Annie is.
: Fiting is srs biznis guys
AAAH. POPPURGRAGAS.
: Moral of tonight's session.
It's like Gremlins? Don't feed after midnight?
: Help me GD
6 minions every 30 seconds, so potentially, each 30 seconds, 24 mana back (No I'm not counting siege minions, because <insert_reason_here>), if you last hit every damn minion. Let's say you manage to last hit half of it (which seems to be the average for Silvers), it means 12 mana for 30 seconds, so 2 mana per 5. The fact is, this MP5 value is not constant, it depends on the time of the game and the skill of the player.
Amachy (NA)
: Which Bullshit were you told, and believed in as a new player?
Ulting a full life Maokai with Warwick while the whole enemy team is right next to him is a good idea. Nashor's Tooth with Annie is OP. Sona is an ADC.
trumpsta (NA)
: > Which one did you try to smite? small ones
> > Which one did you try to smite? > > small ones You can't smite small monsters anymore, only large and epic monsters, plus minions. It was noted in the ingame hintbox, but I didn't see it in any patch notes.
Rew711 (NA)
: Players, please don't dislike this Thread but...
> His model doesn't even allow you to see his face. Do you see Scream's face? Serial Killers like Teemo always hide their faces.
trumpsta (NA)
: cant smite wolves as kha with tailbrazor thing
: I have proof that I'm winning at life
I'll take the screen. For... Research purposes. (Since you seems to have liked MGQ I assume you have good taste :p)
: Just lost 20 lp from rank for losing a normal game
It was a ranked. (Well, according to your history) You're sure your mouse didn't move when you clicked "Normal Draft"?
NuSix3 (NA)
: Does League of Legends perpetuate bad behavior from it's players?
> Absolutely nothing to do about keyboard warriors in chat. There is no tribunal system. There is a report system that doesn't do anything, and doesn't inform the player of the result of their report -- reporting is worthless if I don't know what became of it. *cough*chat restriction*cough* And yes, for you it is worthless. Because yes, you don't know what it led to. But for me it is worthwhile, because I DO know what it means, because I DO know it works, because I DID read many red posts. (Also I go a lot on these boards and the EUW forums, I can tell you : There is a result.) > There is no system for punishing false reports. So assholes and tilts are free to flood the already broken system. Well... Actually there is. Even more, there is two. First, there is a system that gives credit or not to your report. Might not be clear so I'll take an example, with false numbers (we don't know the true numbers for obvious reasons) but that's a perfect example of how this system works. Let's say, at the beggining, a player has a "report value" of 10. When I report a player, his "total report count" is increased by 10 points. If he is **punished**, my value will rise to 11, thus granting me a more powerful impact on the system. If he is not, my value will decrease to 9, thus inhibiting my impact on the system. And you can come to a point where your reports are literally worthless, with a value of 0. Second, those who abuse reports get permabanned. There was a post on EUW about this but I can't find it again. > There is no enforcement of meta play. Some people might argue the game should be open, but no other sport is. At professionnal level, they all use the metagame because it's the way who grants the more chances of winning. But if I create a small football club, nothing prevents me to do a 9-1-1 strat. Pros use a 4-3-3, a 4-4-2, and others because it is... Well, better, but if I have fun this way, I can go a 9-1-1, a 1-7-3, and stuff like that. > There are 5 very specific roles in the game and only certain characters can play them. Zed support? K thanks, how about I never ever ever volunteer to play ADC again. I don't care if I'm bad at it, I'm never going to get a fair chance to be good when my own teammates are trying to subvert me out of bottom lane. You won't ever be able to climb Everest if you only do so with your stairs. > The support role needs to have a bigger impact on the game. I lol'd. As a main support, I can tell you : Supports DOES have a great impact. They are team dependant, but when a Sona ult 3 opponents under your tower, it's almost an secured kill. > There is no training mode. There is a very, very basic tutorial but nothing telling you about roles, characters that are good for those roles and how to succeed at each role. Well, DAH! There's custom for that, and training from lvl1 to 29. The best training is going against other players.
Alphard (NA)
: I finally got my chat logs back, but I don't think they are toxic at all.
Hi! > [30:57] Alphard: normals [30:57] Alphard: are [30:58] Alphard: so [30:58] Alphard: gau [30:59] Alphard: gay Some might say I'm a bit prude or I tend to overthink everything, but imo saying you hate something then telling it's "gay" is homophobic.
: IM GONNA TROLL FOREVER AND THERES NOTHIN RIOT CAN do!!!!
: > Base lvl18 GP AD w/o runes/masteries/stuff = 105. > > + 4 * 80 (4 IE) = 320 > > + 30 (Trinity) = 350 > > + 40 (LW) = 390 > > So, when he Q, he deals (120 + 390) x 2,5 = 510 x 2,5 = 1275 physical damages every 5 seconds. Without taking runes/armor/masteries/Spellblade in account. > > If he had this page (AD Red, Health yellow, MR Blue, ArPen Quints) I took completely arbitrary, he'd have 390 + 8,55 AD, so it'd be 398,55. > > With [this](http://gameinfo.euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/game-info/summoners/masteries/#4-L7YukIT.4dtFafaae.0.0) random mastery page made in 5 secs, he'd have +10 AD (Brute force), so 408,55, + 4 (Martial Mastery), 412,55 AD. > > Then let's add the bonus from Warlord. ((412,55 - 105) x 1,05) = 322,9275 + 105 = 427,9275 total AD. > > With this, he deal, with one Q, ((120 + 412,55) x 2,5) + 210 (Spellblade passive) = 1541,375 physical damage. Plus 2% from Double Edged Sword so 1572,2025. Plus 3% from Havoc, so 1619,36858. EVERY 5 SECONDS. > > Then, let's take armor. Let's say someone has 100 armor. With Last Whisper + the mastery, it's 38,5% ArPen(Don't remember the exact math though), so before taking flat ArPen it will be as if the target has 61,5 armor. With the 7,5 flat from runes, it means it will be treated as 54 armor. > > To calc damages, the formula is : damages x (100/100 + armor). So, it's 1619,36858 x (100/154) = 1619,36858 x 0.649350649 = 1051,53804 every 5 seconds, for a DPS of approximately 200 DPS. > > IMO, not worth to be squishy as hell to deal less than an ADC. How the fuck do you start your post with saying "GP has 100 ad at level 18" not even counting 16 AD from his E passive then proceed to say "GP has 390 AD because his item gives him 390 AD" And that is done under the assumpion of 1) No Baron buff 2) No Drag buff 3) No Elixir 4) He was so ahead the other side squishy level was low the armor probably didn't even reach 70. 5) He never AAs. Like, really, the tank will dive him, he will orange the CC and proceed to 4-hit with AA Q AA AA bam dead tank because he was really ahead.
> How the fuck do you start your post with saying "GP has 100 ad at level 18" not even counting 16 AD from his E passive then proceed to say "GP has 390 AD because his item gives him 390 AD" . . . . . . . . . That's... Not the point. The point is : How the fuck can I be so dumb X'D Yep, looks like I got it all wrong. Too lazy to redo all the math now. Maybe later. Maybe not.
: Is there any recourse for false reports? What about an option to avoid large premades?
The premades you've been matched with report value will soon fall down to 0. If it isn't already. Plus, if you really did nothing, you won't receive anything. Also, accounts that report [u]way[/u] too much for nothing (When I say this, it means if you are just reporting behaviour you find innapropriate you shouldn't worry) get permabann'd.
Show more

Max Nobody

Level 91 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion