| Rioter Comments | new Comment | Views | |||
| Rioter Comments | new Comments | Views | |||
Requiemsfire
(OCE)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
for {{champion:98}} : That was before Zed became {{champion:238}}.
|
|||||
Ebonmaw Dragon
(NA)
{{champion:58}} : WRONG FFS you're only saying bullshit on this one. go read this : https://universe.leagueoflegends.com/en_US/story/renekton-color-story/ It literally tells that the only reason that motivated Renekton to be reborn after all those centuries in the dark was his will to get **VENGEANCE** upon {{champion:75}}.
{{champion:111}} : Ok but his ingame quotes still have that thematic with the "Left to die [...] Lost and forgotten [...] I will have **VENGEANCE** " and many more
{{champion:83}} : He want to clean in the first place, i'm ok with that. But still after that he aims to avenge the island and get his hands on the Ruined King.
{{champion:6}} : You can still check his lore and his quotes definitely show that if he meets {{champion:50}} again it won't be for having a friendly talk. Basically if he meets {{champion:50}} he will CLEARLY avenge himself upon {{champion:50}} as he betrayed him.
{{champion:412}} : Yes but first for that, he has to pass through {{champion:412}} and that's probably not going to be Friendly. THo you're right and I understand that this one is ambiguous and can be considered not a vendetta.
{{champion:268}} : Still wants to make {{champion:101}} pay for what he did to Shurima Empire ( Go check quotes ).
{{champion:23}} : Yes he does but still considering his lore relation with {{champion:266}} and the quotes that this one says when he meets him CLEARLY shows that if {{champion:23}}'s voiceover is updated it WILL have a **VENGEANCE** like quote toward {{champion:266}} .
{{champion:63}} : Agreed
{{champion:98}} : Still if he gets a voiceover rework it will most certainly have a quote which implies that he does not forgive {{champion:238}} for his father's murder. That's meant to be a sort of vendetta against him.
|
|||||
EvilUnicornLord
(NA)
OH DAMN thanks i forgot about Lucian.
|
|||||
RyzeTheSmurfMage
(EUNE)
Right. Thank you for pointing me this one out.
|
|||||
Cetri
(NA)
Yes I know that Vengeance is not the first goal of all those champion but I mostly wanted to show that it's something that is way too much implemented in Champions' background.
Also for {{champion:57}} and {{champion:83}} , even tho it's a second goal it's not Just a second goal because this Vengeance goal is CLEARLY present in many many of their quotes. Unlike {{champion:98}} for example who doesn't even have a {{champion:238}} interaction quote.
|
|||||
|
EvilUnicornLord
(NA)
Yes but when you use it too much it's repetitive and boring. Look at {{champion:555}} for example. His whole Lore is based on Vengeance because it's the only thing they found to give depth to the champion's story and build up some easy in-game quotes. Without Vengeance this champ's interest (besides Ingame and design cause all champs have one) is non-existent.
They should stop using these "easy way out" of champ's lore and atmosphere or find some new ones.
|
|||||
| Rioter Comments | new Comments | Views | |||
| Rioter Comments | new Comments | Views | |||
japhib
(NA)
I wrote <49% by the way, so I Meant inferior to 49%, which is usually not to be considered too good. {{champion:31}} is hovering at around 48% Winrate as average of all Elo.
Also the "Fluctuation" is Usually meant because of different sources. Champion.gg is Plat+ on default setting, and LeagueOfGraph is Gold + on default setting. They also have different Region sources that they don't always display (For example It's KR servers for Op.gg) and some take stats on last X days while others take stats from the Patch Release.
|
|||||
Doublmull
(NA)
Even After playing {{champion:31}} for a while it's Very complicated on Level 6 and 11 ult especially against high HP people because it's super hard to define the number of HP they have when it's below 1K. After 16 and once it deals 1000+ true Damage atleast I have the 1K HP on HP Bar that is a "sort of" execute indicator but considering sometimes you just stress out when the enemy is around 1K HP it's still not as effective.
And yeah PLZ BUFF. {{sticker:sg-shisa}}
|
|||||
My Waifu Vanilla
(NA)
PLUS It makes a very loud sound on top of that
|
|||||
Valeeva
(NA)
I agree everyone shouldn't get this but for {{champion:238}} and {{champion:122}} , it's not SUPER crucial. Sure {{champion:122}} gets a Reset but it's not as valuable as a {{champion:31}} Stack if it's not in team fight and for {{champion:238}} it's only if the target dies before or with the DeathMark Proc. For {{champion:238}} it's hard to understand but Let me explain. In a complete 1V1 scenario where you want to get the Shadow AD out of the kill, Once the enemy gets low and you wonder if the proc is going to kill or not, no matter if there is the Execute indicator or not you can still hit the target until the Mark proc. And if it didn't kill you wouldn't have got the Stack in any way. If you want it simplified, {{champion:238}}'s Execute indicator is more meant to signal when you can escape of your position from incoming danger and still get the Kill ( In team fight and Dive situation for example). While for {{champion:31}} It's meant to signal when you can kill the Target to get the Stack. {{champion:238}} doesn't Need that because of his Mark Proc being at the very end of your whole burst. Basically, a {{champion:238}} that would be like {{champion:31}}'s would be one that shows when your full combo will give you the Kill because once you pressed R you already launched the Execute spell. I hope you'll get the Point.
|
|||||
| Rioter Comments | new Comments | Views | |||
Lohrr
(NA)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
First of, What you're saying makes no sense because it means that chat restriction is bad no matter what and yet you know that this is wrong and that's the reason why it's implemented.
Secondly, you don't understand anything about what I'm saying. I'm using the kid and the punishment as an example. What I'm basically saying is that if you ban someone for 1 yeah let's say, they will think about what they've done and will make everything to keep their account once it's back. While if you permaban them and say that the account is simply gone, they will simply create a new account and play with more toxicity due to the anger of the complete loss of an account.
|
|||||
Cobra70
(EUNE)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
I Feel Really sorry for you considering the time you spent on this account.
Just like you I wish riot could implement **Very Long** Chat Restriction and Game Bans instead of the Permanent Ban because kid's behavior gets way better when you confiscate their Computer/Game Consol rather than when you break it, which won't make them think about what they've done and will make them feel hatred towards you instead.
But sadly it's Riot's Policy, I Know it's stupid but we can't do much about it.
|
|||||
Jamaree
(NA)
Some people simply have to get their anger out in some way :/ I mean I do it sometimes when I hold myself for too many games. Because let's be honest, if you're not Gandhi it's going to be hard handling consecutive losses because of trolls or E-Bay accounts.
|
|||||
| Rioter Comments | new Comments | Views | |||
Novalas
(NA)
Hey! It's me again on {{item:3508}}.
I just noticed that some Part spells with CD on start like {{champion:92}} 's Q or {{champion:58}} 's E CANNOT reduce their CD if the spell is not fully used, EVEN if the cooldown starts on the first cast.
Basically, if you E once with {{champion:58}} and hit a something (get your 2nd E) for example, and auto attacks afterward (between the 2 Es) will NOT reduce your E cooldown because it's still up, even if the actual E cooldown has started before then.
You can clearly see it in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqOsD-r0gn0&feature=youtu.be
I auto-attacked twice between my E cooldown that has 8 seconds, and after I use my 2nd E the cooldown appears to be 7 seconds left (Only the time I used for the 2 auto attacks, no reduction.
Will this be fixed?
|
|||||
C9 Squeeky
(NA)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
Upvoted cause the 1) and the 2) are ones I already thought about.
For {{item:3060}} I agree that the item can be badly balanced. It gives more Armor than Mr (that can be considered fine) but the active is really either too effective or not effective that much depending on the enemy champion ( unlike other item active that are anti--something but still works ok in atleast every scenario like {{item:3156}} {{item:3139}} {{item:3814}} ) If you're an ap champ or very magic damage oriented (Like most tanks, supports, and midlaners) this minion is going to take ages to take down, while if you're an adc it's going to be nearly as easy as any regular cannon minion.
Not only that but the fact that it can no longer stack with {{item:3512}} in term of passive made is WAY better than {{item:3512}} because it's cheaper, gives more stats, and most importantly, the active is much more effective at doing the same thing:
-Time/space of lane support:
{{item:3060}} minion can start from your base and end up at enemy T3 unlike {{item:3512}} who's voidling dies VERY FAST and can't go very far, resulting in the {{item:3512}} being exposed very to enemy fire most of the time if the {{item:3512}} is placed in order to attack a tower.
-Effectiveness of lane support:
It's already explained above, but {{item:3060}} minion are basically way more worth than a {{item:3512}} portal because it's much harder to kill for nearly 1/2 of the champs when for {{item:3512}} you can just go to the source and destroy it.
And that's on top of the Gold/Stats efficiency being much more worth on {{item:3060}} . This inequality really has to be solved.
For {{item:3042}} it's true that the itemization is very VERY very low. Even {{champion:126}} does almost never builds it anymore and {{champion:81}} is the only one left. The completed active is very interesting for sure but I think the main problem is that you have to upgrade your {{item:3070}} into a {{item:3042}} in order to stack mana with your auto attacks that are core in an ad champion. Whereas for {{item:3040}} you can keep your {{item:3070}} and still stack up effectively.
|
|||||
Ender L
(NA)
Thank you !! {{sticker:sg-kiko}}
Feel free to give any feedback if there is anything done about it :-3
|
|||||
|
Novalas
(NA)
There is an essence reaver users inequality:
**ON ONE HAND**:
Multiple Hits / Cooldown started before Damage
- {{champion:58}}'s W and {{champion:102}}'s Q can reduce their own cooldown because the 2nd ( And 3rd for {{champion:58}} ) hit occurs after the cd start, because the Cooldown start with the first hit.
- Same for Abilities like {{champion:81}}'s,{{champion:41}}'s, {{champion:157}}'s and {{champion:105}}'s Q because the cooldown start as the ability is used, resulting in the on hit appening post cd start and having their Qs cooldown reduced by itself.
**ON ANOTHER HAND**:
- Simple empowered autos such as {{champion:86}}'s, {{champion:48}}'s and {{champion:75}}'s Q or {{champion:24}}'s W aren't reducing their own cooldown because the landing of the ability start the cooldown.
- Same for some abilities dealing damage and applying on hit on cooldown start ( Like {{champion:19}}'s Q )
- Abilities such as {{champion:114}}'s W, {{champion:31}}'s E or {{champion:240}}'s W can't reduce themselve because the cooldown start after all the autos are consumed. That's a small problem that probably can't be solved so don't pay attention to these.
As a result there is a sort of inequality in term of usage of the essence reaver's steroid.
**Question**:
Is it intended that stuff that applies on hit once and start their CD as the attack land can't have their on hit used for reducing their own cooldown thanks to essence reaver?
Or knowing that there wasn't ever any issue like this of maybe having to tweak the On Hit CD start to imput such mechanic ( Exept for {{champion:102}}'s Q but wasn't needed because 2nd hit was already applying the cd reduce so it was no need to make the first one too )
Are you going to be looking forward to change that?
|
|||||
| Rioter Comments | new Comments | Views | |||
Aokirai
(EUW)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
I think "Slave" in "Meta Slave" is still taken as an insult just like the n word because it's a computer and it doesn't care about the context, so saying slave in game may be as bad as calling someone the n word or telling him to k word
|
|||||
Toxicate13
(NA)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/ghKQoeu8-how-to-unbind-your-enter-key-to-prevent-inadvertent-toxicity
{{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
|
|||||
miltfox
(EUW)
Melee {{champion:69}} on an {{champion:81}}
{{sticker:sg-lux-2}}
|
|||||
flyerbek
(NA)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
> [{quoted}](name=Cryonix,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=5P0wl33N,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-03-13T00:50:42.825+0000)
>
> My guess is a combination of Dematerializer, attacking Rift Herald, Red Buff, Scorch, did she have smite?
She didn't have smite, we didn't do herald that game, she didn't get red buff and even if she did it wouldn't be higher than jungle's true damage as they get red buff and use it much more often then she does. Maybe dematerializer is bugged but I need confirmation.
|
|||||
Infernape
(EUW)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
The bonus damage you deal to the type of minion after execution is amplification damage, not true damage, and I doubt executing 6 Lane minions deals that much.
|
|||||
| Rioter Comments | new Comments | Views | |||
Chermorg
(NA)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
Explaining logically and reasonably to the one bullying that it's wrong is
> bullying the bully
That's new
|
|||||
mah1foo
(EUW)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
Being Positive and a nice guy defending people having a bad game = spamming the chat
Riot 2k18
|
|||||
|
mah1foo
(EUW)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
https://gyazo.com/cf3b74ab8c0dc2e9f7972534c42109bb
It's fun cause he's defending someone called a inter even tho he ended the game 2/6/2, which is clearly not inting, that's a regular bad game and it happens to everyone, and for defending this guy that is called what he ain't and being a nice positive guy, he got punished. Riot's system is fucked up.
|
|||||
|
Novalas
(NA)
Hi!
- Results of {{champion:58}} Buffs? enough? Not enough? anything planned on him? (such as quality of life bugfixes)
- Thoughts on {{champion:19}} ? Why not nerfed yet?
- Anything planned for {{champion:111}} ? He kept on getting worse and worse over the last season and the buffs you did didn't do much.
- WHY IS THERE STILL NO VFX UPDATE FOR PREHISTORIC {{champion:31}} SKIN'S Q AND E?
Thx for responding.
|
|||||
|
Meddler
(NA)
:
Quick Gameplay Thoughts: March 3
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
Hi meddler,
-How is the {{champion:58}} Buff going? (thoughts on the results)
-Thoughts on {{champion:19}} Right Now?
-Is anything planned for {{champion:31}} (up to the far future, not just next patches)?
|
|||||
ZephyrDrake
(NA)
I'm going to quote myself :
> Not even mentioning most scaling runes are either:
-Forced to be taken, like Legend and Hunter series
-So much better than non-scaling that they are always taken and the most popular by far. Like the 2nd slot in sorcery tree with Transcendence, Celerity and Absolute focus.
Let's be honest here, no one ever takes absolute focus, and it's pretty obvious why.
Also, you can add the 2nd slot of resolve where EVERYONE takes conditioning and I'm not even going to explain why it's obvious. Scaling rune have the majority, and they are the best, so everyone takes them, and if everyone does, champs that work around scale and scale better have a clear advantage.
|
|||||
Telephone Booth
(NA)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
Trying to not say something that could hurt {{sticker:galio-happy}}
|
|||||
Cotten Eyed Joe
(NA)
Yes, and that's pretty much it.
|
|||||
Dark Vaatu
(NA)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
Git Gud
|
|||||
TimeNeverChanges
(NA)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
As someone who main top and never ever play bot lane or even ranged champ.
I have to admit Lucian is so bad Right now that I can feel it myself when I get a Lucian on my team or on the enemy team, cause, in this case, I always lose/win.
Definitely true that the buffs he received were incredibly minimal and he deserves more.
|
|||||
Imperial Pandaa
(NA)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/939528801234456576/aY5Q4R3J_400x400.jpg
|
|||||
ll Wasabi ll
(NA)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
No matter if you're asian or not, the system doesn't care.
Just like how the N word is ok to be said by Colored people IRL, The N word is forbidden for everyone in league. Cause we're not going to check who's behind the screen, it's Internet, no matter if you're asian or not, this is considered to be said by someone neutral.
|
|||||
Velasan
(NA)
"The Ap item update might help"
This incoming Baron Buff Buff : https://gyazo.com/6bad591e1852cda88009df30c7306f6f
And Elder Dragon Buff Buff : https://gyazo.com/aced9750c20ebffb1cf8411340a40070
Aren't likely to favorize sieging.
|
|||||
Je suis Rubick
(EUW)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
If you're D1 you know league of graph is bad reference and riven late game is definitly not "God tier" she's average and that's obvious. she doesn't have hard cc, they last for <0,5 sec and her steroid is range and ad only, that's definitly not the definition of " a lot ".
|
|||||
|
Je suis Rubick
(EUW)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
I'll add something:
She doesn't have a "god tier late game", she's aint jax or nasus.
|
|||||
| Rioter Comments | new Comments | Views | |||
| Rioter Comments | new Comments | Views | |||
Andrew Sins
(EUNE)
RenekTonsOfDmg
(EUW)
https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/ghKQoeu8-how-to-unbind-your-enter-key-to-prevent-inadvertent-toxicity
{{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
|
|||||
| Rioter Comments | new Comments | Views | |||
ADlN
(EUW)
Flaming someone you don't even know can have sense even if it's really bad and i don't encourage it.
Flaming a premade is worse because you literally have to be a dickhead to do that.
|
|||||
RenekTonsOfDmg
Level 285 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes