Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: Also, where is it confirmed that he's making the next champ??
I think Meddler said so in a comment in the boards, I cant find it though
: He created yasuo and kallista correct? imo he's 1 of the best! I know it's a cool meme to hate on yasuo but I have never seen such a sick designed champion.
He also worked on warwick, which is one of my favourite champions design wise
Rioter Comments
: They took away the onhit heal and gave the passive its scaling back instead. I'm interpreting the new change as a Janna player who shields herself gains the bonus attack speed.
> [{quoted}](name=Daddy Issues,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=vlOcjwBv,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-09-18T20:00:01.660+0000) > > They took away the onhit heal and gave the passive its scaling back instead. I'm interpreting the new change as a Janna player who shields herself gains the bonus attack speed. Uh, no, I understand that they kept the on-hit heal. The current passive states that you do on-hit damage, and heal for the same amount, they are simply buffing the damage, but dont mention removing the healing.
: The new passive effect will actually get the stat boosts. Meaning beware of Taric
> [{quoted}](name=ZenithEevee,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=vlOcjwBv,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2017-09-18T20:01:29.096+0000) > > The new passive effect will actually get the stat boosts. Meaning beware of Taric *Laughs in Mordekaiser*
Rioter Comments
: If you're mastery 7 with Mordekaiser and don't even own Pentakill I'm going to report you.
: wait, Skaarl is a girl?!? the more u know
I might be confused, but I think it's not confirmed. I remember some rioter saying that Kled gives 0 fucks about it, and will call him/her based on... who knows.
Meep Man (NA)
: (Champion Rework) Mordekaiser, Lord of Malice
Wow, really impressive. I like the way he interacts with MS and AS now. You also gave him similar amounts of shielding, but requiring more skill to get them. I still dont like that his ult only works if he kills the target, I think it makes the skill too binary, but at least its a skillshot now. Would you mind if I took some elements from the passive, and give him my own rework? Will post in it in the mordekaiser subreddit, and maybe in rhe boards. And of course give you the credit for that. Also, have you considered giving him a Brittle? That thing makes him sinergice like crazy with vanguards, while not making him unbearable in 1vs1 scenarios, as he doesnt have CC for himself (knockups dont count). Maybe in the ult?
: The bot lane that won lane, won game? Weird.
Dude, but adc in 2K17, so nerfed. Sad.
Ralanr (NA)
: You don't need perfect though. Perfect is a matter of opinion and trying to make that into a character rarely goes well at all. Braum isn't perfect simply because he had to punch his way around the door for example. We have inspiring characters that aren't grey. Your post was worried about characters being grey, it's clear that League is not an "only grey characters" game.
Yeah, I am glad I was proven wrong
Fasmodey (EUW)
: Hey, stop here! whatcha doin'?! Are you aware of that this game is T rated? I report you, sorry mate. /s
Fasmodey (EUW)
: He actually is not like that! He is cute trust me! *Smashes his victim's head in his grasp, rips the heart of his pathetic body just so he can feed his mindless slaves with flesh and blood for them getting bloodlust and even more dangerous like they already aren't. Not forgetting enslaving the soul, tormenting it for all eternity and using it as tool for reaching his goals.*
*also forces the poor victim to do his laundry*
: You forgot Jhin, who's basically a serial killer. But yes, I do understand where you are coming from, and Riot has been trashing the lore of older champions and making no effort to keep what made those characters unique, either dumbing it down, or trashing it entirely for some generic crap. Riot not only trashed what was interesting about Karthus and Xerath, but also Nasus, Renekton, and Trundle. Even with the Reworks, Riot could have EASILY carried over the story beats of those characters, keeping the intricacies of their backstories to fit the new lore and the new world.
No, he is a STYLISH serial killer.
: But Morde is just misunderstood!
He killed his servants and enslaved their souls for all eternity, because they were LOYAL to him. How fucked up is that?
Ralanr (NA)
: This isn't about characters being perfect. This is about characters not being grey. A perfect character is boring. It's why superman is hard to write.
Albus Dumbledore (until the 6th and 7th books). All Star Superman is one of the most popular Superman comics. And thats just popular culture, you also have Calliope from Homestuck. People sometimes need something which is inspiring and perfect.
mecharri (EUW)
: Damm, I forgot about Janna, and she is quite recent. Dont feel that Galio is perfect (he s just a Weapon in the end), but yeah. See? Its just in my head. No need to go paranoid. *five minutes later* BUT WHAT IF...!
Ralanr (NA)
: Mordekaiser, Thresh, Hecarim, most if not all of the void, Braum, Galio, Janna. These are characters who aren't grey. They have flaws, but they aren't confused morally.
Damm, I forgot about Janna, and she is quite recent. Dont feel that Galio is perfect (he s just a Weapon in the end), but yeah. See? Its just in my head. No need to go paranoid. *five minutes later* BUT WHAT IF...!
: That just makes her more likeable by me and me even more mad at Darius.
Yeah, I'm all for badass girls, I just wanted to point out that she is more than a cute blonde girl.
Fasmodey (EUW)
: I think having more grey characters is better than having pure white and black characters as majority. Does it mean we shouldn't have them? Not even close. They are necessary, and I 100% want pure good and evil characters, but I think for a more realistic story, grey champions should be majority. Because in our world, vast majority of people are shades of grey. Some champions are close to light grey, some others are to dark grey. Garen and Darius are example. Garen fights to protect his country and family, Darius does that for power and conquering, even though undirectly also protecting his country. Garen is light grey, Darius is dark grey. But none of them are pure good and evil. Then we have Ivern, Braum, Thresh and Mordekaiser. These champions are showing extreme sides of alignments. Braum and Ivern are pure good IMO. Imagining more lighthearted character than them is hard. Thresh and Mordekaiser is evil for being evil. They are cartoonish villains. They are freaking evil and people who deny are either retarded or trolling. Grey characters are also more relatable and it is eaiser to descript their actions. They show much more emotions than white and black. A good character would avoid to kill for whatever reason, but a grey character would fucking burn alive murderer of his/her family. This is something relatable by most of people and it is highly shown interested.
Yes sure, I'm in board for a Universe with diverse characters.
: >I think players could like a Kayle that is perfect, or a Nunu, or a 100% evil Vladimir, or Mordekaiser. People who hurt others, just because they enjoy doing so, or that want to have power at any cost. >Again, this is probably just in my head, and Riot will do a fantastic job. But... AAARGH! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPaP6bptny4 Alarak is proof of this :p It's absolutely possible to adore an unredeemable bastard so long as they're amusing or badass enough and the writing doesn't expect us to think of them as anything but a monster.
The top all time post of reddit is a shitty meme about Star Was's Emperour, so definitely. Evil pieces of shit can be done right. And then we have Bowser, Ganondorf, and many others.
: Darius was bound to have a sort-of grey side. He was always depicted as an honorable fighter who stood for a nation that had a "code of honor" but since the war against Ionia forfeited it by a huge margin. Darius rivalry against the current leader of Noxus and his will to carry on the "values" of Noxus had him in the grey zone for a long time. I just don't like how he got a cute blonde girlfriend >.>
Well, the cute blonde girlfriend got into the higher ranks of the Noxian army, probably not by being a sweet and caring person, she even tried to assasinate Darius. But yeah, I can see the problem, and the cleavage was kinda unnecesary in a battle armour, however, the same can be said about Darius having his arms exposed, and both of them not having a goddam helmet, and... Draven... like... all of him... I get it looks cool, but its a bit too ridiculous for me. Can we just get the Noxian blacksmiths fired?
Rioter Comments
DaNinad (NA)
: What about Nasus? I find it hard once he reaches level 9 he can duel me with once enough stacks and some mr. What do I do against him? (A new Morde player, so I'm probably just really bad)
Against Nasus you want Stormraiders Surge, ALWAYS, it basically means you get to ignore his W, and helps bully his weak early game. Once that he is scared of you, you zone him away from the minion lane, and properly punish any attempt to stack his Q, if he want to farm with his E, let him, he will run out of mana and push the wave towards your tower, which makes the zoning a lot easier. Once you are well farmed, and you have gotten the tower, you take herald, then drake, combine both, and take an inhibitor at minute 15, then proceed to push other waves and try get other inibs until 21, where you take the next drake, take Baron with it, and finish the game before the Nasus scales.
: That's completely wrong, the instant a ranged champion gets into your flash range they are as good as dead since Morde can drop and entire rotation of spells in less than 1.5s through pure animation canceling
Yes but no. To really be able to burst someone like that, he needs to be stupidly fed, or charge up his Q somewhere, and it takes more than 1.5 s to do so.
Revali (NA)
: >We got a significant bug fix recently, eliminating the most annoying one of his bugs, meaning that the remaining ones are just trivial stuff that might as well just be kept until they trash all his coding when he gets his VGU. What bugfix?
His W damage "burst" at the end not doing damage to some targets. Was really anoying when lasthitting and screwed up some trades.
: > [{quoted}](name=mecharri,realm=EUW,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=ia6VVqME,comment-id=002000000000,timestamp=2017-08-11T10:27:00.608+0000) > > This isn't about "pushing agendas", there doesn't need to be a global conspiracy. People are LGTBI, characters can be LGTBI, and that shouldn't make anyone worried. It doesn't make sense to not include LGTBI characters in games because "people want to break from reality", you mean people want to break into a fiction world where nobody is LGTBI, and that makes them happier? That's kind of dark if you think it that way. > > What I get from your words is that you feel that some people are making their sexuallity the most important thing to ever happen, and that you are tired of it. The constant reminders of how people are gay, gay gay. Well, the thing is that these reminders aren't even close to being as constant as the attacks that most LGTBI people receive, the US presidency was getting all transgender people kicked out from the army. > > I can understand that some people are tired of this conflict, but it's a necessary one, and we should have it in every aspect of society, because LGTBI people also play video games, and they see shit as the word "gay" being used as an insult. Everything OP asked for was to have a bunch of LGTBI characters, without anyone making it a big deal, and look at all the negative feedback, insults, and crap they are getting for it. You're not really making a good case for this. You're basically being a vegan about it and that is a fair reason why people don't listen or deal with this shit. You give them an inch then they want a mile. First one champ, then two, on and on it is never enough. Liike tahm kench they are never sated. If said character is too weak they'd complain that riot doesn't respect them enough or even worse that riot wishes bad things upon thier community. Some of the stuff you see them say or post on social media is just mind bogglingly stupid. Remember the drama over Christians not baking a cake for some couple and how spiteful they were to them for not baking that cake? As the guy a few posts ago said league don't need any of that mess in it. Let league simply be a game were we can all escape real life's drama and rage about them god damn trolls in our ranked games.
Dude, there's no need to insult anybody here. You don't have to bark to anyone who talks about "this shit" and bring your conspiracy detector and all the artillery just because people asked for one character to have one specific minor feature as a part of their personality. Chill, we can have this discussion whitout this. And if we can't it's exactly why we should be having this discussion. If you want a good example of people behaving like idiots over some LGTBI character, you don't need to mention some stupid circlejerk about baking cakes, you just need to look at the Steven Universe fandom. But even with THAT much stupidity (and there is a lot of "shit" if you dig a bit into that fandom), your points don't hold up. You are sounding like some industrial talking about his workers: -Ah, these stupid fools, these little worthless lazy bones, how they dare? HOW THEY DARE? I ask, for "basic labour conditions"? What will be the next thing? Working for less than 16 hours a day? Not allowing 8 year old children to work in sulfure mines? Payed vacations? They deserve a mile, for all the crap they have gotten, but they didn't even ask for a mile, they asked for an inch, so, until they ask for a mile, don't get mad. They are asking to be treated as equals, to have LGTBI champions as there are straight cis champions, and I don't see why you are so worried about this. What if all of League's cast where LGTBI champions? Wouldn't people still like the game and fell attached to the champions, because "you don't need to have the same sexuality to feel attached to characters"? As many people are saying here?
: > [{quoted}](name=mecharri,realm=EUW,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=ia6VVqME,comment-id=0020,timestamp=2017-08-11T09:50:38.382+0000) > > Well, there are a lot of people discussing why LoL should have a LGTBI character or not, and I just see things too clearly. Because of THIS. THIS. This whole post, and its comment section, that's why League should definitely have more LGTBI characters, because they aren't normalliced in society, and whenever someone brings this issue to debate, the whole thing turns into a mess of insecure guys trying to make it about themselves. > > Guys, it isn't about US, it doesn't always need to be about us. Some people are gay, just let them be gay, you don't need to feel attacked in any way, again, this isn't about YOU, but THEM. The fact that some League characters where defined as being LGTBI wouldn't affect you on the least, but it could make a lot of people happy, and it would also help make their situation more normaliced. > > They don't want a LGTBI "Token" character, they don't want a character whose only defyning trait is being gay, because that would be boring and insulting. People are much more than their sexuality, people have ambitions, dreams, flaws that have nothing to do with their sexuality. The only reason for them to talk so much about sexuality is that they CAN'T, because they aren't allowed to talk about it as it was a normal thing. And it HAS to be a normal thing, because otherwise, we are hurting each other and making a lot of people go through lots of problems, just for being born they way they are. > > All that OP asked for was for Riot to "throw a bone". That's it. Not some character wearing rainbow clothes and yelling about how gay they are. How many people are like that in real life? They want a Hero, or Villain, or whatever, like any other character in League, and they want Riot to CONFIRM, just with one message, or picture, or some short story, that aside of being a Hero, they are also LGTBI. Just like people outside there are LGTBI, without that needing to be "justified" by their life experiences and goals. Blizzard only needed one image of Tracer kissing another woman (can't remember her name, I am not really into OW) to make their LGTBI fans go nuts. That's what people need, those are the tiny steps that help normalice something that should have been normal since the start. > > This is Jorgen: Jorgen is a bruiser with Heavy Ad scalings who is perfect for skirmishes in the early game. He has this gimmick where he uses walls to bounce off them and enhance his attacks and... long talk about mechanics and gameplay... > > ...still talking about mechanics and gameplay... > > ...some random thoughts by the designers... > > ...some Lore... > > ... also, he is gay. And this is is launch skin Warrior Kingdoms Jorgen, have a nice day. > > And it doesn't need to be "justified", whatever that means. People don't need "justification" to be LGTBI, they just ARE, as characters in fiction should simply, BE LGTBI, because fiction is all about making us think about our reality in different and new ways, and people in our reality are LGTBI. This won't turn Riot Games into a machine of throwing "politically correct" (LOL) characters, they just want Riot to "throw a bone", SOMETHING, because so far, they have gotten NOTHING, and that's simply not fair. Come, CONFIRM, strongly, that one character is LGTBI, then keep doing amazing characters, as they always do, maybe add another one in the future. That's it. I don't think LoL should get into pushing socio-political agendas, whether for good or bad. People play games to take a break from reality, not to have more of it.
This isn't about "pushing agendas", there doesn't need to be a global conspiracy. People are LGTBI, characters can be LGTBI, and that shouldn't make anyone worried. It doesn't make sense to not include LGTBI characters in games because "people want to break from reality", you mean people want to break into a fiction world where nobody is LGTBI, and that makes them happier? That's kind of dark if you think it that way. What I get from your words is that you feel that some people are making their sexuallity the most important thing to ever happen, and that you are tired of it. The constant reminders of how people are gay, gay gay. Well, the thing is that these reminders aren't even close to being as constant as the attacks that most LGTBI people receive, the US presidency was getting all transgender people kicked out from the army. I can understand that some people are tired of this conflict, but it's a necessary one, and we should have it in every aspect of society, because LGTBI people also play video games, and they see shit as the word "gay" being used as an insult. Everything OP asked for was to have a bunch of LGTBI characters, without anyone making it a big deal, and look at all the negative feedback, insults, and crap they are getting for it.
: See, it would also mean that straight people wouldn't relate to X champion then and already established character's sexuality is always a touchy subject. And I'm speaking as a Bisexual male. I couldn't give a damn who my champion likes to sleep with. What I do care about is them as characters, their personality, what makes them stand out. Being gay, Bi, non-binary or anything in between just isn't something that I consider important to a character. How you act, your merits and what you stand for is so much more valuable when judging a character than their choice of sexual partner.
I don't see it that way. Nobody (even LGTBI people) wants a champion whose only defyning trait is being LGTBI, because, as you said, characters have lots of interesting things going on. Normal people also have lots of things going on in their lifes. The thing is, people do FEEL that their sexuality is an important part of their life, not because they are stupid, but because they are attacked for it. When talking about LGTBI characters stops turning into circlejerks where Moderators need to tell people to calm down, then we can stop talking about LGTBI characters, until then, I feel that this discusions are necessary, because a lot of people feel that their situation is not normaliced. And a character who just simply is LGTBI, for no particular reason, other than some people out there being LGTBI, could do MIRACLES to help with this. It doesn't need to be an important part of the character, because it is already important for a lot of people, and that would make them a lot happier, and then straight people could see that being LGTBI is a normal thing, and that simply saying: -I am fine with you being LGTBI Makes them feel a lot better with themselves. That's why Stonewall happened, that's why Pride parades are still a thing. Those are my two cents.
Sweetsy (NA)
: Queer Champions in LoL Lore
Well, there are a lot of people discussing why LoL should have a LGTBI character or not, and I just see things too clearly. Because of THIS. THIS. This whole post, and its comment section, that's why League should definitely have more LGTBI characters, because they aren't normalliced in society, and whenever someone brings this issue to debate, the whole thing turns into a mess of insecure guys trying to make it about themselves. Guys, it isn't about US, it doesn't always need to be about us. Some people are gay, just let them be gay, you don't need to feel attacked in any way, again, this isn't about YOU, but THEM. The fact that some League characters where defined as being LGTBI wouldn't affect you on the least, but it could make a lot of people happy, and it would also help make their situation more normaliced. They don't want a LGTBI "Token" character, they don't want a character whose only defyning trait is being gay, because that would be boring and insulting. People are much more than their sexuality, people have ambitions, dreams, flaws that have nothing to do with their sexuality. The only reason for them to talk so much about sexuality is that they CAN'T, because they aren't allowed to talk about it as it was a normal thing. And it HAS to be a normal thing, because otherwise, we are hurting each other and making a lot of people go through lots of problems, just for being born they way they are. All that OP asked for was for Riot to "throw a bone". That's it. Not some character wearing rainbow clothes and yelling about how gay they are. How many people are like that in real life? They want a Hero, or Villain, or whatever, like any other character in League, and they want Riot to CONFIRM, just with one message, or picture, or some short story, that aside of being a Hero, they are also LGTBI. Just like people outside there are LGTBI, without that needing to be "justified" by their life experiences and goals. Blizzard only needed one image of Tracer kissing another woman (can't remember her name, I am not really into OW) to make their LGTBI fans go nuts. That's what people need, those are the tiny steps that help normalice something that should have been normal since the start. This is Jorgen: Jorgen is a bruiser with Heavy Ad scalings who is perfect for skirmishes in the early game. He has this gimmick where he uses walls to bounce off them and enhance his attacks and... long talk about mechanics and gameplay... ...still talking about mechanics and gameplay... ...some random thoughts by the designers... ...some Lore... ... also, he is gay. And this is is launch skin Warrior Kingdoms Jorgen, have a nice day. And it doesn't need to be "justified", whatever that means. People don't need "justification" to be LGTBI, they just ARE, as characters in fiction should simply, BE LGTBI, because fiction is all about making us think about our reality in different and new ways, and people in our reality are LGTBI. This won't turn Riot Games into a machine of throwing "politically correct" (LOL) characters, they just want Riot to "throw a bone", SOMETHING, because so far, they have gotten NOTHING, and that's simply not fair. Come, CONFIRM, strongly, that one character is LGTBI, then keep doing amazing characters, as they always do, maybe add another one in the future. That's it.
Limrick (NA)
: If you can't relate to a character because they have a different orientation, then I'm sorry but the fault lies with you there. I'm a straight guy, and my favorite game character from the past few years is Leon from Fire Emblem, and he's gay. I can relate to him in ways other than sexuality, which I'm pretty sure most people also do. It's like saying that you can't relate to a character because they're white but you're Latino, it just doesn't add up. Not being able to relate to their sexuality is one thing, but the entire character being ruined because they aren't the same orientation as you is frankly pretty narrow and borderline bigoted.
He didn't state anything like that, he just said that it would be nice to have more variety in Leagues Characters, and yes, variety for the sake of variety is good, people are diverse, and fiction should reflect that. My sister was absolute nuts when she started reading the Harry Potter books. Why? Because she has glasses. Thats it. She absolutely adored to see a hero with glasses, and felt strongly identified on him, and they didnt even share gender. People can relate themselves to character through many ways, but the more similar a character is to you,the stronger he resonates with you, specially if the thing you share is something you feel is a defyning part of yourself, the great thing about this is that it doesn't need to be a super important part of the characters life, just yours. I mean, people where over the moon when Blizzard released a comic confirming Tracer is gay. Thats all they needed, one fucking picture, and people went absolute bonkers. Why does X character need to be gay? Because people are gay, thats it. People arent gay because that reflects their past experiences and life goals and... no, some people just happen to be gay,the same could apply to characters, some characters could simply happen to be gay. And it would be nice for a lot of people. They don't want a character whose only defyning trait is being gay, or trasgender, who only wears rainbow coloured clothes, and solves problems through love and empathy and... na. They just want a normal League character, who is also like them in a sense that is important for some players.
: ADC {{champion:82}} with brittle and {{champion:89}} support
I have always been a huge {{champion:82}} {{champion:25}} fan because of the root and the anti-CC shield, but yeah, you get the idea.
LoliKnight (EUNE)
: IS there going to be a future VGU? Has a red commented on this? Genuinely curious here.
Yeah, he is in the Top priorities for a VGU.
LoliKnight (EUNE)
: In theory it would be good I admit, but ofc this has little to no chance of happening , and implementation wise , there might be many hidden issues which are hitherto not apparent to us. I'll admit it could be interesting to see live.
I am talking about the future VGU, not implementing this into the current {{champion:82}}, sorry if I wasn't clear enough.
Rioter Comments
Wolfeur (EUW)
: A full tank meta, and the best tank-killer in the game barely gets 50% win rate, that means she's not doing her job correctly. And the high play rate is due to a big fanbase.
The tank what? May I remind you who are the top tier supports right now? Did you forget what type of item are almost every toplaners and junglers buying? We are in a goddam support and adc meta.
: I think that the bans were justified. 1) They weren't playing the game. It's not a strategy or tactic, it's something intentionally designed to drag out games to infinity. 2) They were wasting the enemy team's time knowingly and willingly. In my eyes, this infinite-game ploy is only useful for griefing the enemy team. The only win condition to it is that the enemy team has to surrender out of sheer boredom. 3) They were holding the people in that game hostage for as long as they could, simply to troll them. NO THIS IS NOT A STRATEGY, THIS IS A GRIEFING TACTIC. Say you had to deal with that for 45+ minutes. Would you be happy that they're wasting almost an hour of your time? Answer is "no" and you'd probably be the first one to cry "OMG REPORT THESE GUYS" on the Boards. I say they got their comeuppance. If they want to do nothing except waste everybody's time in what is supposed to be a for-fun gamemode, then they rightfully deserve to eat a ban. Riot should fix the exploit so it can't happen again, but the people abusing the exploit are still at fault.
1) > it's something intentionally designed You mean... like a strategy? Or a tactic. It's a strategy that Riot has allowed to exist in this gamemode, and being "boring" to play against doesn't make it less smart. Check what the "fifty move rule" is in chess, people will try "boring strategies" if they give them some chance of winning. 2) > They were wasting the enemy team's time knowingly and willingly. The same could be said about not surrendering or opening mid in a 3/19 match, but that is not reason for a ban. You can't blame people for fighting till the end. Psychologically weakining the enemy is a valid tactic in strategy game, trying to tilt the enemy team is a tactic that WILL give you some games, camping one lane, WILL give you some games. It's not the players fault for trying them out, if Riot thinks these are not fine, they should fix them, not instaban the ones that showed the flaws of the system. With the information we currently have, this is simply not fair, as far as we know, they got instabanned, without a warning, and you can't justify this simply saying: "hur durr it wasn't fun". It's Ascension for fuks sake, not Ranked.
: > [{quoted}](name=Shenocide,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=VNxGEKsk,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2017-08-05T17:57:02.093+0000) > > That sounds pretty saucy mate. Would do if I had a support I could count on. Than just go solo lane and do it. Tho when I go solo lane I use a super off meta build: gunblade, rageblade, liandries, and whatever else you maw need like maw or mercurial.
Rage... blade... *screams internally* But being serious, as I always say, if it works, it works.
: @Malicious Metal - Doth thou hath advice for a silver Morde?
You should check the Mordekaiser mains subreddit too. There are lots of posts covering this issues and many more, and of course, you can get answers to your questions from many Mordekaiser mains.
mkyner (NA)
: Wait, do multiple {{item:3089}} really stack?
It's the item with the highest AP, and no, the passive doesn't stack.
: I hate the way boards makes you hide the name of the troll. Why protect someone like that?
Because then, some members in the community would make "justice" in their own way, and that's a big fucking NOPE for Riot. Like a X6 {{item:3089}} Lux ulted into the ground and draw a giant NOPE in the floor. Past experiences have shown how bad online communties are at managing harassment.
Exifile (OCE)
: Pls Riot Make this
As a Legend of Zelda fan I 100% support this.
: RIOT! You truly nailed what Mordekaiser should be in this music video!
: > [{quoted}](name=mecharri,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=77im8Tsu,comment-id=000e,timestamp=2017-08-03T14:15:01.643+0000) > > > -Have you tried Doran's shield start? I have heard that it can be better than relic shield, specially vs poke supports. > was good before nerf, now it's meh imo dark seal is strong to snowball, and it increases healing from potions > [{quoted}](name=mecharri,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=77im8Tsu,comment-id=000e,timestamp=2017-08-03T14:15:01.643+0000) > > -When do you try to take dragon? Is it worth to try some sneaky drake, or do you only go for it if you have killed someone? > i do it with my sup if i have the clone of an adc, i do it if i'm 6 and they don't have a ward with my jungler > [{quoted}](name=mecharri,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=77im8Tsu,comment-id=000e,timestamp=2017-08-03T14:15:01.643+0000) > > -Why no stormraiders? I always take DFT in toplane, but the few times I played as ADC I felt that I had enough damage without it, and prefered to take stormraiders. > you have a support to cc them, so you kinda don't need it, it also increases your poke you can try, but from my experience and the experience of my final hour it's better tbh > [{quoted}](name=mecharri,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=77im8Tsu,comment-id=000e,timestamp=2017-08-03T14:15:01.643+0000) > > -What are your thoughts on Morgana support? I have tried it with some friends and we had good results. The shield is nuts on Mordekaiser, her 3rd lv Q gives plenty of time to burst a squishy, and the all in with Morgana's R + your W is very strong in 2v2s or 2v3 ganks. > strong after laning phase in lane it doesn't have a lot of presence really, i tried it indeed > [{quoted}](name=mecharri,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=77im8Tsu,comment-id=000e,timestamp=2017-08-03T14:15:01.643+0000) > > -This is important, when do you generally ger boots? After your Rylai's? Also, do you always rush Rylai's, or is Lyandrie's viable? yes, after rylai
: 71% win rate on 101 ADC Mordekaiser games, ask me anything about ADC Mordekaiser
Mordekaiser main here, I mostly play him in toplane. Many questions regarding the ADC playstyle, for context, I play in low Plat/high Gold: -Have you tried Doran's shield start? I have heard that it can be better than relic shield, specially vs poke supports. -When do you try to take dragon? Is it worth to try some sneaky drake, or do you only go for it if you have killed someone? -Why no stormraiders? I always take DFT in toplane, but the few times I played as ADC I felt that I had enough damage without it, and prefered to take stormraiders. -What are your thoughts on Morgana support? I have tried it with some friends and we had good results. The shield is nuts on Mordekaiser, her 3rd lv Q gives plenty of time to burst a squishy, and the all in with Morgana's R + your W is very strong in 2v2s or 2v3 ganks. -This is important, when do you generally ger boots? After your Rylai's? Also, do you always rush Rylai's, or is Lyandrie's viable?
: Care to explain how Zhonyas deals 0 damage but Hex does?
You cant do any damage during stasis, lifeline, in the other hand...
: I didn't expect this.
Show more

mecharri

Level 71 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion