Rioter Comments
: Kayle can be an 'ok' support, but you have to be playing/building her as a support, not as a carry (so you're building AP or heal/shield stuff, not attack speed). It can produce some rather spicy heals (with added movespeed), and the ult can be fight changing, not to mention her slows, and a dash of resistance shred. Trying to build her as the late game AS carry kayle on a support budget is likely to be punished by competent lane opponents though, so I'd be very wary of thinking of her of a support that can turn into a hypercarry if need be, since by the time you got to hypercarry status the game would probably be over.
{{item:2301}} {{item:3504}} {{item:3006}} {{item:3071}} {{item:3091}} {{item:3124}} Shred ALL the resistances! {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}}
: Kayle is the champion who can fill any role and not be called out for trolling. She is best suited for mid lane though. http://www.auplod.com/u/pdolua802d6.png
{{champion:44}} is bae <3
: She CAN, and don't let meta police tell you otherwise. That said, she is BETTER pretty much anywhere else. She can jungle, top, or mid better than she can support. Again, does not mean she cannot support as well, just that if you're already playing Kayle, just play to carry.
Well, I can't lane and have a fondness for paladins/angels, all while at the same time loving the ability to turn into a hyper-carry if it needs to be so. Hence why I'm asking. Now the question is if she's viable for being the main support for a support main ;3
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Teridax68,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=QPFp01vN,comment-id=000700010000,timestamp=2017-04-26T10:49:35.393+0000) > > (if it were, Dota 2, which is significantly snowballier than LoL, would be the more popular game). Dota 2 is not snowballier than LoL. Both teams have much more control of what to contest for much longer than LoL. If it were, you wouldn't have gold priority and each role functioning perfectly fine with different amount of items. In LoL, every role requires item investment and without them is incapable of influencing the game. We've had so many seasons of Riot trying to make supports something more than ward slaves who have no other meaningful contribution and the only solution they could come up with was to give them alternative gold gains and items that are so cost effective when taking in account their actives that it's insane.
I've played DotA2, and it actually does feel more snowball-oriented than League. I can't put into words how many times I've asked in team chat "Anyone wish there was a surrender option?" and gotten 'Yes' in response. Ever try to 1v2 a 13/5 Slark? You can't, really, whereas in League you can. The reason it doesn't feel so snowball-y, however, is because towers take a good while to kill even for the 200-damage Slark. As for LoL being item-based and DotA2 being hero-based, that's correct; LoL has champions that function well without items ({{champion:89}}) but a majority of the carries are item-based. In DotA2, Drow (for example) can still slow/kill easily without any items, with purely levels, because of her passive. The same would go for Mirana or Luna, albeit with a bit of difficulty. (Meanwhile, {{champion:51}} without {{item:3031}} tickles a bit!) Both of these games are so complex that even one very smart person can't decode all the systems involved, which is why there's always more than one developer and why the original DotA mod was horridly unbalanced but fun. (HELICOPTER D {{champion:24}}! PENTAKILL! 8====D to 8=====D! Wasn't here back then as I started 8mo ago, but the Youtube videos of that are just fucking awesome/funny.)
: Nah, even assuming that each game has no impact on the next (if anything, I think you'd do worse after consecutive losses), it is possible. There's a whole 0.0000000931% chance of that happening by chance. That's super possible. :P
If you actually did the math for that, you're fucking awesome. Edit: Good God, you did.
Olyander (NA)
: For feedback regarding this ridiculous problem, MMR matches are skewed... You either get massive wins or massive losses...consecutively....sometimes 5-7 games in a row. It just doesn't make ANY sense for games to be generated this way. It used to be much much better in season 3. Back then, it seemed to balance as you went. 2 wins...1 loss... 2 losses...1 win.... the matches were longer, and closer.... Once you got away from the group of players that throw games at the end by dying in bronze situations, you could really evaluate your skillsets. Now, you have players on the opposing team who greatly outmatch yours or vice versa. It's almost like you have to time your losing streaks so you can get a winning streak for your promotions... its absolutely retarded.
I had a 30 loss-streak in ranked. Something like that should very well be statistically impossible.
: > [{quoted}](name=Órrion,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=QPFp01vN,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2017-04-25T19:43:28.963+0000) > > But then imagine it being 3-15 only five minutes in? Imagine that their jungler so far outclasses yours, their midlaner so far outclasses yours, their toplaner is just about equal to yours, and... your botlane may as well not exist for them, sans as &quot;free tower gold!&quot; > > It&#x27;s so... so... so unfun, and so infuriating, and it... shouldn&#x27;t happen given you match people properly, but it does. > > I love your name, by the way. Most of the time it boils down to their jungler outclassing ours and that goes way out of control. Lane skill match up only applies up to a point. That point has also been made smaller compared to previous metas that I've got to experience. (weren't around for S5+6) I remember when the Jayce vs Riven lane was considered a skill match up. And you could still play it out as Jayce while 0-2. You could still play it out as Riven while 0-2. Now both of them with stomp the ground of each other with that score. Back in season 3 I could play from behind with some comfort and remedy a mistake. This seems to be really hard right now. Some reworks are also really obscene in that regard. (Katarina coming to mind.) Less vision also gave junglers so much more power. It seems that it's a lot of small things piling together to result in a really fast paced snowball. No wonder the few pro games I've seen are the typical 1-4 kills by minute 30. Anything more than that and the game's done. I think Riot has to make a really in depth look at pacing instead of these fragmented changes. Things seem as narrow minded as ever, with very little long term planning.
> [{quoted}](name=Fed by Snu Snu,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=QPFp01vN,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2017-04-25T19:56:25.622+0000) > > Most of the time it boils down to their jungler outclassing ours and that goes way out of control. > > Lane skill match up only applies up to a point. That point has also been made smaller compared to previous metas that I&#x27;ve got to experience. (weren&#x27;t around for S5+6) > > I remember when the Jayce vs Riven lane was considered a skill match up. And you could still play it out as Jayce while 0-2. You could still play it out as Riven while 0-2. Now both of them with stomp the ground of each other with that score. > > Back in season 3 I could play from behind with some comfort and remedy a mistake. This seems to be really hard right now. Some reworks are also really obscene in that regard. (Katarina coming to mind.) > > Less vision also gave junglers so much more power. It seems that it&#x27;s a lot of small things piling together to result in a really fast paced snowball. No wonder the few pro games I&#x27;ve seen are the typical 1-4 kills by minute 30. Anything more than that and the game&#x27;s done. > > I think Riot has to make a really in depth look at pacing instead of these fragmented changes. Things seem as narrow minded as ever, with very little long term planning. Part of the bitter irony is that people liked the older, less snowball-oriented meta because it meant more, and longer, teamfights with more to them instead of a forfeit by 20 because they have 5 kills on you and there's no hope to come back from it.
: Being exploited and going 0-5 is by far the easiest it has ever been as a meta. I can't even blame anyone for suffering that fate anymore, since I have found myself in that situation. Getting to a point where the only redeeming action is a gank from your own jungler within a single or two kills is ridiculous, feels crap and is crap.
But then imagine it being 3-15 only five minutes in? Imagine that their jungler so far outclasses yours, their midlaner so far outclasses yours, their toplaner is just about equal to yours, and... your botlane may as well not exist for them, sans as "free tower gold!" It's so... so... so unfun, and so infuriating, and it... shouldn't happen given you match people properly, but it does. I love your name, by the way.
Rioter Comments
Looknook (NA)
: Why do you have Bard all over the place? Pretty sure he has only ever received buffs and no nerfs since his inception.
That's sorta' my point; He was abysmally weak on release to the point people thought you're a troll for picking him.
Sarutobi (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Órrion,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=fHMur2kq,comment-id=0002000000000000,timestamp=2017-04-21T17:43:26.490+0000) > > Your goal as a main is to see every encounter with them, not to *already* have seen every possible encounter and matchup with them. It&#x27;d be nigh-impossible to see it all due to the diversity of team compositions, which is something insane like 1.2 billion or so. > > So yes, I AM a Rakan main I can say with certainty. Thats just my opinion, no need to be so defensive. By that logic you could say you main every single champion in a certain role because of how little say Support champions there are currently in the meta. If that is what you think is a Main so be it, but just know not everyone shares the same opinion. Its great that you main him, but in my eyes you (and everyone else who plans on using/playing/maining) still need a lot of training in order to be consider a main.
That's fine, but in the end you wouldn't be wrong *or* right after all, since it does vary person-by-person. But me, I plan to play Rakan as much as I feasibly can, since he's so fun to play and suits my playstyle perfectly. So someday, anyway, I'll live up to you and GiD's criteria, even if I don't really have a reason to care! Muahaha! *evil as fuck laugh*
Lazy cat (NA)
: http://championmasterylookup.derpthemeus.com/summoner/?summoner=ÓRRION&region=NA https://na.op.gg/summoner/userName=ÓRRION Fanatic is a better word. I only call it a Main when you have him top three and basically only have a match history of him.
Both, how about?! AHAHA RAKAN RAKAN RAKAN... OH DEAR- wait... I actually am.
Sarutobi (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Órrion,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=fHMur2kq,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2017-04-21T17:30:39.847+0000) > > What about me, hmm? I&#x27;ll gladly add you to show you just how well-aware I am of how Rakan plays. > > Some people love their playstyle because it&#x27;s unique enough to be closely perfect in their eyes. You don&#x27;t need one or two games more to know how a champion feels to play; You know how they feel to play right off the bat, as that&#x27;s *how you know if you want to continue on playing with them or not!~* > > Anyway; I don&#x27;t disagree with dodging. It&#x27;s a neutral line, for me. A grey one. > Dodging comes a consequence of a wait time. A consequence of picking or banning any new champion is to deal with dodges, *especially* with that last one because you don&#x27;t have much right to ban someone elses&#x27; fun because you don&#x27;t want to learn to play against them. > > Plus, if no-one plays the new champions because they&#x27;re always banned, then no-one will learn how to fight them, and they&#x27;ll just keep getting banned. > {{champion:164}} > > ~~Sorry for the wall of text.~~ There is a difference between knowing how a champions works, and having it as your main. You cannot have them as your main as (at least in my opinion) you couldnt have been in every battle with them. You cannot know the ins and out, what the pros/cons are for that champion, what the best items work very well and in what situations.
Your goal as a main is to see every encounter with them, not to *already* have seen every possible encounter and matchup with them. It'd be nigh-impossible to see it all due to the diversity of team compositions, which is something insane like 1.2 billion or so. So yes, I AM a Rakan main I can say with certainty.
Lazy cat (NA)
: They don't exist. To whom are you addressing?
Me possibly. I plan to/do main Rakan.
Sarutobi (NA)
: I always find it funny when people claim to main a new champion. I understand you are going to want to main them, but at this point in time they cannot be your main. You haven't played them well enough to be considered "main". But I do agree people need to stop dodging. Either play vs ai or blind normals if you really want to play them. If not then you just gotta be lucky to get them.
What about me, hmm? I'll gladly add you to show you just how well-aware I am of how Rakan plays. Some people love their playstyle because it's unique enough to be closely perfect in their eyes. You don't need one or two games more to know how a champion feels to play; You know how they feel to play right off the bat, as that's *how you know if you want to continue on playing with them or not!~* Anyway; I don't disagree with dodging. It's a neutral line, for me. A grey one. Dodging comes a consequence of a wait time. A consequence of picking or banning any new champion is to deal with dodges, *especially* with that last one because you don't have much right to ban someone elses' fun because you don't want to learn to play against them. Plus, if no-one plays the new champions because they're always banned, then no-one will learn how to fight them, and they'll just keep getting banned. {{champion:164}} ~~Sorry for the wall of text.~~
: Even after the stats hotfix and the Daisy and Q buffs, Ivern still took a full month to break 50% winrate (6 weeks after his release) with no additional buffs. Granted, Rakan is nowhere near Ivern's level of uniqueness, but be will still see a pretty dramatic rise in his winrate even without buffs. He plays way differently than other supports.
Hmm... ...well, I'll admit bias here; I learn pretty fast to the point I've already grasped exactly how to play Rakan, as well as the functionality of his skills, and so I expect the same of other people even if I sort of[?] know it's unreasonable because everyone is not good at everything. We'll see! I will reserve judgement.
: if you took that as a personal attack you might actually be mentally challenged, clearly you never read the sources you provided your self or you would see the gaping holes in your argument but hey at least you can make false claims, talk shit about my arguments not based on them being wrong but based on them not being based on your sources and call this a personal attack when the only thing i know about you is that you are bronze and i haven't even brought it up until now.
Never said it was one. I said I didn't want it to become one. Anyway, I've read my own sources. You say I have gaping holes in my argument, and you never tell me what those are, instead you're too focused on covering the cracks in yours via an argument... without a foundation. But take it however you will; I won't reply further. Goodbye, my friend; I wish you luck.
: > Oh by the way, LolKing, LolAlytics. OP.GG all say that he evens out at 48% after 15~ games played on average. So... three sources beat one. well i can't argue with arguments that are as retarded as "its this because i have a vagina" so i guess you can "win" this one. none of the sites you listed actually confirm what you said and you bringing a essay of bullshit into this to hide the fact you aren't actually saying anything at all, might work in middle school buddy but it stops at a point.
The irony is that you're still talking with nothing to say for yourself. And by the way... read the ~~strikethrough text~~, so... if you can't prove me wrong then it's just proof you really don't care or don't even have an argument counter to it. And it *is* proof. But hey, start with [this shit](https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem) instead of a functional counterargument; Really makes you look like someone worth listening to, y'know?
SatomiKun (EUW)
: It is way too early now to say if Rakan is balanced or not. Iverns winrate was incredibly low at release and look what happened to it. Iverns playstyle was different from every other jungler in the game. People had to adjust to his playstyle first to use him at his full potential. Same could apply here, Rakan plays pretty different from every other support in the game. He has the play pattern of an assassin (jumping in the enemy team, doing stuff, then jumping out again) and a pretty high skill ceiling in my opinion. We definitely should wait before calling him balanced.
We should, but we also got to remember how Ivern came to be. Daisy had a massive A.I update so she wouldn't do literally nothing anymore, and Ivern himself had the Q cooldown lowered to a point it's actually functionally useful as an initiation *and* a chase tool, two major things that seem to be set aside as fairly minor. We don't need to call him balanced, we need to thank Riot for not making him excruciatingly broken on release a' la' {{champion:432}}{{champion:143}}{{champion:164}}{{champion:432}}{{champion:136}}{{champion:432}}{{champion:432}}{{champion:432}}.
: so the person qqing about source credibility links me to wikipedia ... twice ... to the same page. championgg and lolking are trash sites that should never be used, lolalytics and opgg don't provide the same kind of statistics so comparing the 3 would be retarded and on top of that they haven't updated yet.
Because both links involve the exact same thing, in the exact same context in the exact same sentence. Wikipedia is credible because it actually defines what is what, and short in short everything from offline to online to handheld dictionaries agree on the definition of 'confirmation bias'. Of course it's freely-editable, so it'll have plenty of trolls ~~the Anita remarks in the entry on Adolf come to mind~~ but it also has a LOT of superusers to fix that because it's *popular thanks to being credible and vice-versa*. I challenge *you* to prove otherwise, and if you can't, then... well, you can't [argue.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)) By the way, LolAlytics, LolKing, OP.GG and Champion.GG DO display the same info: champion pick-rates, builds, and all but one have the ability to skew it based on division and rank. You're using ONE site, and then getting asshurt when someone tells you to use more than what *just* confirms *what you think*. It helps you later in life, too, so... Being able to check multiple sources for info, that is. It prevents bias, and in turn confirmation bias... which is looking for evidence that supports what *you* claim and... denying all other evidence contrary. ;) Oh by the way, LolKing, LolAlytics. OP.GG all say that he evens out at 48% after 15~ games played on average. So... three sources beat one. ~~I didn't fact-check this. I want you to try and genuinely prove me wrong.~~ Edit: Removed a link. I don't want to be a hypocrite. Edit2: Rakan's LoLGraphs profile doesn't seem to exist.
: When was the last time riot released something that was worthwhile? Xayah and Rakan are literally one of the worst releases so far. What happened to champions with cool kits like {{champion:238}} who when you ult someone their heart explodes. And then we have generic sh!tter champs like Xayah. Oh, auto attack. all she does. her whole kit is complete crappa lappa. and then Rakan, the annoying little autistic 12 year old who just dashes 2 times and taunts like rammus. We need more champions with diversity, pls riot.
...but isn't a champion with a skill Zed has, a skill Rammus has, a skill Lucian has, a skill Kat has still a new and unique/diverse champion? Don't even get me started on the character design for Xayah and Rakan. I fucking love it; It's not superficial at all. They're also a really fucking adorable couple, so that helps.
: http://www.leagueofgraphs.com/champions/stats/rakan a new semi mechanically intensive champion reaches over 50% win ratio at 8+ games played, yeah his going to get nerfed and anyone who says his "under-powered" is stupid.
No. People in general use more than one source for [a reason](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias). Use OP.GG and Champion.GG and LolAlytics and LolKing *and* LeagueOfGraphs. Not just one and one alone. Singular information from all of the listed sites is unreliable.
Derfel (NA)
: I have no idea what you're saying Rakan is broken as shit. What you're doing here is pretty much writing a thank you letter to mc donalds for selling burgers. What a stupid thing to do.
http://www.op.gg/champion/rakan/statistics/support http://www.lolking.net/champions/rakan#/overview http://lolalytics.com/champion/Rakan/ Look at his winrate. He's just above Ryze and below *everyone else.* If you lost to him, you either sucked hard or he was really fucking good. Being thankful they at the very least released him in a somewhat balanced state (albeit under-powered slightly) is how to get more champions *released in a balanced fucking state, because without thanks **THEY HAVE NO REASON TO DO IT**.*
Rioter Comments
: The worst part is that it is very hard to climb as a support unless you duo.
Well because {{champion:497}} is my favorite champion, and {{item:3107}} is my favorite role... uh... er... kill me. On second thought, don't. Whenever I want to play a role that isn't support I'll just tear through prey like a stick of butter being dropped into a blender, so I guess that'll be fun. Some day, though... [I'll be back.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Gt5KgJtwcY) Mark my word, for [I give and gave it.](http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/IGaveMyWord)
Rioter Comments
: I'd like Xayah; I appreciate the thought nontheless, even if I'm not picked. _Unless everyone gets a gift . . ._ __{{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}} __ EDIT: Forgot to friend you, doing it rn. Thanks for the millions of IP you're spending on us. You deserve also a million upvotes.
I'm a third! But I'm not so sure I classify as "new" so I'll just... go over here.
: I hate yasuo more than the next guy but lets not kid ourselves here.
: Most League players either spend their day at school/work doing things they don't want to do. It doesn't shock me that they don't want to continue to do things they don't want to do in their free time.
This is one of the main reasons people despise playing a role they didn't select, are bored with, or just aren't versed at in general. Contrary to popular belief, many people don't play support because they don't *want to*, but more because there aren't any support champions that suit how they like to play. And for those who say "Oh but you got filled and Olaf support isn't a thing," why the fuck should they have to play a specific champion *to make you happy* because Riot can't make a role more fun?
: i mean...... it is ANNIE we are talkign about lets be honest here. I was expecting you to say Yasuo, tryndemere or Yi or something............_ but, Annie tho....._
Yasuo is easy-to-play fundamentally, but I'm more talking about people like {{champion:11}}, {{champion:11}}, {{champion:31}}, {{champion:86}}, {{champion:19}} and {{champion:22}}. Champions meant to learn the game with but are at the same time extremely flexible and capable. Plus, even if Annie isn't at all mechanically hard to master... ...she really, really, *really* helps you learn and practice your basic mechanics, which goes further than being able to play {{champion:157}} well and... and... that's it. I can't put into words how nice it is knowing full well what I'm capable of, and making use of that as best I can with a few more clever knowledge-based twists to it (such as setting ganks up) instead of being {{champion:157}} and unsure of how this'll end.
: Play who you want and don't listen to what people say on whether they are 'real' champions or not because those are dumb arguments every champion is real within the game However I don't really have any sympathy for people who play Annie she's dirt easy to play as and ridiculously unfun to play against
I'm biased so I won't comment with much more than "Yeah she's easy, and yeah I'm sorry I play her when I get that 'really cheesy' vibe to her, but she's one of the very few champions I love to play." So... Yeah she's easy, and yeah I'm sorry I play her when I get that 'really cheesy' vibe to her, but she's one of the very few champions I love to play. {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}}
: OR you just buy Ionians and Flash R over the wall and delete anyone with less than 3k HP or 175 MR
You need like 10k gold to do that.
: damn skippy! play whatcha want, i may just quit and take the potential ban and make my team lose cuase theres no hope for this damn gnar token. im fixin to go from jykall to hyde again its time to go play a rts solo for a bit. dueces im out.{{sticker:zombie-brand-clap}}
Get {{item:3124}}{{item:3143}}{{item:3742}}{{item:3022}}{{item:3006}}{{item:3026}} and thank me later. I call it, "Adolf Hitler WON'T ****ING DIE!"
: im sometimes one of those kind of people :P i moved on from point n clicks mostly, (cough garen/irelia/swain) i just dont like being cheesed while tryin to get tokens XD sorry i dident add something relevant.
You also didn't add anything irrelevant! My only gripe is with "Ugh they're right you need to play a real champion noob..." and nothing else added. lol
: {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
{{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}} {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}} Da's some goo' popcorn. Caramel-flavoured!
: Instructions unclear. Got 30 downvotes for trying to start discussion about Lee Sin.
This isn't an upvote-farm thread. I genuinely believe people need to stop calling a champion "Ez-mode" and then going on to say "Omg you don't deserve the win, play a real champion" and things like that that possibly invalidate all of the genuine effort you put in. That being said, I'm really glad it isn't just me.
: Bruh you press R, its not that hard. Fizz Ult is 1000x harder to land then Annie ult lol.
I've had an easier time landing Fizz's ult than I have Annie's. In fact, in one of my more recent games, I discovered a bug[?] for flash-ulting as Annie with around 30 ping, where Tibbers will spawn *facing in the direction you clicked in to spawn him* but... he'll spawn behind you. Even when you very blatantly clicked on the enemy champion. Meanwhile, with Fizz, Flash+R or R+Ignite works flawlessly, since I have a tendency to stalk bushes people frequent, waiting for some poor prey to walk on by. I have missed about... eh, three[?] or so Fizz ults of something like fifty-two. YMMV.
Rioter Comments
: Yeah, overall it's just really rude and pointless to act like an asshole, though most of this generation can't tell politeness from cussing out their elders...
A somewhat generalizing statement, but I do sort of get what you mean since I've had some absolutely horrid experiences. ~~Ever have some random group of people in Discord talk about how they'll rape the one woman in chat with them? I hope not. It's awful.~~ Me, I don't treat my elders any different than I'd treat you or a random stranger; I'd do to you what I'd have done to me, with exceptions ~~due to sadomasochism.~~
: Ummm... I exist, am currently 17, and don't, nor have done any of that.
I second this. 17 and haven't done, nor plan to do, any of that. That's not to say I dislike having a good time, I just dislike it when it costs everyone else around you.
Rioter Comments
: imaqtpie stated that the reason he is better than most people is because he reads tooltips.(legit not joking, it was in one of his video.)
Same thing here, or at least I'd hope :P
Rioter Comments
: Well ranked is still stupid popular, and they have a better indication of skill than you get from norms. But yeah, shit happens, not much you can do about it. Played a game with a pal on my low level account (not worth calling it a smurf, since I was only silver last season) and had four people pre 30, one silver vs 1 gold, 3 plat, 1 diamond.
: Norms are weird.
> [{quoted}](name=RenownedWheat42,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=OEF9acme,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-04-14T23:05:56.123+0000) > > Norms are weird. You'd think they'd do their best to make normal matchmaking *better* than ranked since everyone plays normals and few do ranked. Alas it's about the same. :/
Rioter Comments
: That could work. Good idea on the quests thing.
I do wonder what happened to the subquests like they are in bot matches. I'm 90% sure people who know to ward wouldn't care much about the quest, so it wouldn't get in the way, but I'm also 90% sure it'd be a great reminder to the people who think that it's just *my* job to pop wards down everywhere. ...I would, if I could have more than three and a control ward down at once. Hell, if they cost 75g and were infinite, I wouldn't care if I never got anything more than an {{item:2302}}, I'd have the map lit up like a Christmas tree. As for Blitzcrank, a nice way would be for a death recap that states "Stand behind your minions" if you got hit by the Q. It doesn't tell you anything about how his Q interacts with them: by pulling them instead of you. Nope, it gives you the most useless advice: "Dodge the skillshot." ~~It'd also help if there was a colored indicator showing the width and length of the hitbox. Being hooked from behind minions by his apparently-magnetic hands is annoying as f***.~~
Show more

Órrion

Level 30 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion