: > [{quoted}](name=AXayahAccount,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=NvimQ909,comment-id=000000000002,timestamp=2019-06-23T07:32:59.621+0000) > > In short, the body needs well over 40 grams of carbs a day to survive. Table sugar is a disaccharide of glucose and fructose called sucrose. The body uses glucose, the fructose must first be converted inside the liver. Your body can make all the glucose it needs through gluconeogenesis, though. Eating simple carbohydrates results in a quick spike of insulin, a hormone that makes cells store glucose as glycogen. Problem is, insulin also makes fat cells store glucose as fat. If you eat too many simple carbs in one sitting, you will store a disproportionate amount as fat. Natural foods also contain complex carbohydrates and fiber, which means there is more glucose flowing into the system some time after the insulin peak occurs. With a soda containing only simple carbs, there is no more glucose coming after that initial spike, causing your blood sugar to drop. This makes you crave more carbs, causing you to overconsume calories, which makes you fat. The spikes caused by consuming large amounts of simple sugar in one sitting also blunts the insulin receptors, eventually leading to diabetes. TL;DR: the body does not need sugar and consuming too much sugar is bad for you.
> [{quoted}](name=Land Dreugh,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=NvimQ909,comment-id=0000000000020000,timestamp=2019-06-23T12:40:44.348+0000) > > Table sugar is a disaccharide of glucose and fructose called sucrose. The body uses glucose, the fructose must first be converted inside the liver. Your body can make all the glucose it needs through gluconeogenesis, though. Eating simple carbohydrates results in a quick spike of insulin, a hormone that makes cells store glucose as glycogen. Problem is, insulin also makes fat cells store glucose as fat. If you eat too many simple carbs in one sitting, you will store a disproportionate amount as fat. Natural foods also contain complex carbohydrates and fiber, which means there is more glucose flowing into the system some time after the insulin peak occurs. With a soda containing only simple carbs, there is no more glucose coming after that initial spike, causing your blood sugar to drop. This makes you crave more carbs, causing you to overconsume calories, which makes you fat. The spikes caused by consuming large amounts of simple sugar in one sitting also blunts the insulin receptors, eventually leading to diabetes. > > TL;DR: the body does not need sugar and consuming too much sugar is bad for you. Glucose, IS Sugar. There are different types of sugar, which you described, but sugar and glucose are the same thing. So the body does need sugar to survive and needs you to consume things that can be converted to sugar. That said, I understand what you meant in the entirety and my point wasn't to say that soda is needed, it was to say you need more than 40 grams of carbohydrates to survive daily.
: > [{quoted}](name=Julevi,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=NvimQ909,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-06-22T20:29:59.941+0000) > > Any particular reason for cutting out soda? probably because most sodas contain 40+ grams of sugar which is already twice the amount of sugar recommended to have daily... and that's for a small can.
> [{quoted}](name=The Trent,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=NvimQ909,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-06-22T21:11:02.507+0000) > > probably because most sodas contain 40+ grams of sugar which is already twice the amount of sugar recommended to have daily... and that's for a small can. Sugar is just carbs. Sugar is the most basic form of carbs and our body uses glucose as energy, no matter what you eat any carbohydrates will turn to glucose, fat will be stored or converted to ketones, a type of acid your liver creates when you don't get enough carbs basically your cells use ketones as a substitute energy. Protein doesn't really turn into energy, it is used to repair your body and cells. In short, the body needs well over 40 grams of carbs a day to survive. Sugar is a carb, you have simple carbs non-simple carbs etc, but sugar is the most basic and simple for the body to convert. That's why when you drink soda, or anything with high sugar you feel full of energy.
: In this hypothetical, would you continue to play her with a 35% win rate? or do you continue to play her because you're still around 50%, but ALSO find her aesthetically pleasing? Two motives are not mutually exclusive. I didn't mind playing Pyke...... before they forced a 50% win rate on him. His theme was pleasing. I played Karma because I found her aesthetically pleasing, but stopped playing her when she dropped to 45% Win status and made getting 50%+ a task too arduous vs the effort (She's back now, but that's besides the point).
Yes I would continue to play her if her overall win rate dropped to 35%, if my personal win rate dropped to 35% then I'd be most likely suffering from some form of mental issue, personal life, work life, daily life etc. Do I enjoy Xayah more when she is top tier best adc? Yes and no, she becomes target banned and picked. Do I enjoy her when she is average middle of the pack, yes, do I enjoy her when she is bottom of the pack, yes. I say this because I played her even when she was the worst adc, win rate wise, in the game. I would never just stop playing her just because her win rate is bad, if anything I'd just quit League of Legends entirely.
: In this hypothetical, would you continue to play her with a 35% win rate? or do you continue to play her because you're still around 50%, but ALSO find her aesthetically pleasing? Two motives are not mutually exclusive. I didn't mind playing Pyke...... before they forced a 50% win rate on him. His theme was pleasing. I played Karma because I found her aesthetically pleasing, but stopped playing her when she dropped to 45% Win status and made getting 50%+ a task too arduous vs the effort (She's back now, but that's besides the point).
If I was sitting at 35% win rate with Xayah I'd think something is wrong with me because I'd most likely not be enjoying her anymore which caused it to drop. If you mean that her overall in winrate is 35% would I continue to play her. Yes. In order for my win rate to ever drop that low on a champion I adore then I'd have a problem elsewhere, personal life, work life, daily life etc. I'd most likely be suffering from some mental issues. I would still play her even if her overall win rate was 35%, I say this only because I played her when she was the worst adc in the game, win rate wise.
: Because you're not taking into consideration the other player, champion, skill levels, etc. You have fun playing the champion you play because you feel they are superior, and beat others in some area of play. You do not play them because they are weak, and you don't play them in ranked because they are "aesthetically pleasing."
Now what if, hear me out. You play a champion because they're fun, not because you think they're just better than the rest of the competition. I have fun playing Xayah because I find her extremely fun to play, not because I just think she is just better than all the other adcs. I also find her "aesthetically pleasing" and like her design in terms of looks. I don't just lock her in because "She is the best and is better than every other champion." I lock her in because "I will enjoy playing this champion more than a different champion because of all the reasons for why I like her, so I'll lock her in." However, she was less fun during the "adc trash rework days" because she lost her established identity.
: Champions I would like to see added in the future
{{champion:498}} (3) or (4) Rebel (1) Your attacks leave behind feathers. Feathers do 25% damage to targets they pass through. Ranger/Gunslinger (I think Ranger is better because it is similar to her W in that regard and lets her get more feathers out if it triggers.) 3 hex auto attack range. Leaves feathers 4 hexes out. (75 mana) E Pulls back all feathers dealing 75/100/125 damage per feather. If the cost is (4) gold snare targets hit with 3 feathers for 1/1.5/2 seconds and deal 75/125/175 damage per feather. They could alternatively just leave two basic tags and just make her autos always leave feathers behind, but I think limiting her tags and instead making it a tag unique to her makes her both powerful mid game and average later in the game, since she has limited synergy. Rather than just powerful mid and late game.
y0r1ck (NA)
: Perfect good and evil may exist in some form outside of our reality and imagination, but that isn't useful in our day to day moral decisions. Sure we may lean to one side or the other, but the metaphysical existence of good/evil isn't what causes it or informs our morality. True, in some ways it's like approaching a limit. We know what it's like, but we'll never know true good or evil. That's what my argument rests on; since we'll never really know true evil or good, how can the existence of these shape our moral compasses? Instead we'll construct our morality from our physical experience. You have noble hopes. Personally I don't want that situation to come around, gives me 1984 vibes lol. DnD is interesting but I've never played it, so I don't really understand that part of your post.
I do agree that our morality is relative. However, I think morality isn't the exact same as good and evil. By that I mean this, our moral compass informs us of what is right and wrong in our eyes, from person to person our morality will change. It is our values we hold ourselves or others to. However, our morality has little to do with good and evil. We will follow what our morality is regardless of good or evil or what others believe, within reason. This is why most people fall under a neutral stance in the good vs evil debate, because most people just look after themselves and maybe a few close friends/family members. However, though morality is very tightly knitted with good and evil it is not good and evil. Right and wrong is what morality confers to, what one or a society believes is wrong, and what a society believes is right. Not what is good and evil. On note of the Kayle story, from my understanding it is in fact Kayle is evil, but she is doing evil so good and prosper. Reminds me heavily of Warhammer inquistors. They have the power to end entire planets, and they will do so, they will weed out all heretics and kill anything that can threaten the empire, they do absolute evil. Point is, I think you have to understand you are doing evil and accept it. As an example of this, imagine how we slaughter animals, we breed them just to kill them months later to eat them. It really is vile and evil, however we must do this act because we need to survive with our massive human population. In the future historians will look back and say how vile our acts were. To me, its not about saying "we are doing good" it is about saying "We are doing evil, so that good can prosper". Animals have similarities to this, animals who fight over territory usually wont kill one another, they will just scare one another way, primates have been known to exile their own because they didn't meet their standards. What drives this from animals may be different from "good and evil" in the same way, but perhaps there is a certain force that drives every living thing to act in a similar manner. Intelligence allows us to be self aware, to distinguish it to name it and to try to sway from it, what we call animal instinct. Soldiers in war do not want to kill people, they would simply do aggressive mannerism, such as shoot close to them, go for non-killing blows on people. There have been many studies of this from ancient to modern times. However, modern soldiers have been bred to shoot instantly, they've been programmed to essentially not think, just act, similar to breathing. So I do believe all living things are born with a natural drive of good and evil, then we create our morals around what our minds understand to be good and understand to be evil.
y0r1ck (NA)
: Im with djinn on this one. How can good and evil exist beyond us yet inform us on what is good or evil? Do you mean that the ideas of perfect good or evil exist beyond our realizations; that god is good and satan evil (when I say god/satan i mean the metaphysical manifestation of pure good/evil)? Those ideas surely exist beyond our physical reality. (Though some would say ideas are part of physical reality since they're just electricity and chemicals really) The pillars of good and evil may exist in some space non-physical, but then we have no real way of knowing what's truly good and evil. For any evil or good you think of, I can name one more extreme. Humanity can not imagine a perfect good or evil. Even in case the pillars of good and evil exist outside of our physical reality, we must still align our moral compasses with what we physically see around us. We have no way of knowing what a perfect good or evil is, so we look around and see what causes anguish or joy and we build morality on that. Thus our worldly ideas of good and evil, the ones we build our morality on, are relative. Btw I like your post. I think I get what you're saying but correct me if I'm wrong
I've always thought of good and evil as a very simple thing. It really is non-relative to my eyes. If we think about humans as a whole, society as we have progressed we can see a clear understanding of how good and evil are not relative. As we strive towards the future you see more aspects of good compared to aspects of evil from before. We can take genocide and see how we've generally frowned upon it as an entire species, we can see many acts of evil from previous acts of time, such as killing an entire group of people, slavery, gas in warfare. We can see, from history alone, we are moving towards a more "good" standing. I do believe good and evil are absolutes in a way, because you can see clear progression towards either of them. The problem isn't the absoluteness of it, the problem, to me, is the justification of each act. How do you justify an evil act or a good act, then you use your biased as a flawed human being to try and say this evil act is good, or vice-a-versa. It is hard to explain from what I am trying to say exactly, but essentially evil does exist, and it must exist. Good does exist, and it must exist. It never changes, rather, we change around it. When we want to abuse and be powerful, we want to lean towards evil and corruption. When we want to be benevolent and peaceful we want to lean towards good and purity. When everyone comes together as a society and deems their acts of good or evil as such. Evil is good, or good is evil whichever, they create divide and in turn ideologies clash. You can see this with governments and ideologies in general, people perceived communism as evil and bad. Communist believed democracy and such to also be bad or evil. Over time we understand that neither is evil or good, it is completely grey and both are perfectly acceptable. When we get new ideas introduced into society we lean towards or away from it, this causes us to believe something to be "good" or "evil" or make us believe that something is bad cause it doesn't align itself with our beliefs. However, that's not how it is. That is the confusion, in my opinion, in why people believe it is relative. I am not saying I am some "woke beast that understands everything" rather I just think that we misunderstand the entire concept behind it which causes us to justify our actions. Just going to point this out, because the guy brought up Star Wars, the Rioter that is. In star wars I never believed the whole light side (good) and Dark side (evil). I always looked at it as like Dnd. Light Side (lawful) Dark Side (chaotic). Chaos naturally leans towards evil and selfish, lawful naturally leans towards good and selfless. This is why in DnD Chaotic good and Lawful Evil characters are harder to play than most others. I could be completely wrong about it all and have no idea what I am saying, but that's my view on the world. I hope, in the future, "perfection" of a society of good and evil can exist, and I hope when it exists the understanding of evils acts exist. Not absolute extinction of evil, rather the understanding that we all have evil in us, we just all want our goodness to show. As with everything, some good people are willing to do evil acts to create the perfect world for all, they must understand though they wont be viewed in positive light and must be willing to accept they have done evil, even if for the right things, and they must take all with comes an evil act. Just my two cents.
Khabith (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=SEKAI,realm=OCE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=VfJmW0l5,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2018-11-16T17:26:26.012+0000) > > Kids are busy playing Fortnite and other battle royale games. Because you just join and pewpew until you die and go next game, so it's kinda popular with kids. It's not that the game can't have skill, but those games have 0 skill requirement/floor, so ofc it's gonna be popular with kids; kinda like how most FPS games are. Fps requires no skill? lmao try joining a csgo match for the first time. If it has a zero skill floor, I wonder why you'd get pummeled
Fortnite aint an fps. Sue me!
: Well then, after two of the feedbacks that I got said I was toxic AF, I guess I don't have any other choice than just disable the all chat, and /mute all on every single game.
> [{quoted}](name=AhriMainForDeal,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=LZANU004,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-11-12T19:41:37.403+0000) > > Well then, after two of the feedbacks that I got said I was toxic AF, I guess I don't have any other choice than just disable the all chat, and /mute all on every single game. Yup, 100%. Never say anything in game that can even be slightly considered as "negative". He saw your name, he smelled weakness so all he did was insult your Ahri play because he knew that was something you have pride in. Trust me, that's all people do to me. They just insult my Xayah play 24/7. Just because I have Xayah in my name it does NOT mean I am good at the champion.
SupMates (NA)
: I Did Not Click "YES" to Surrender! Game Clicked Yes For Me
Riot is going into the "lul next" meta! Soon when one person starts an /ff the game ends.
Lyandere (NA)
: Honor system affecting season reward
I mean who cares, its a bonus skin or something, it doesn't matter. The things that SHOULDN'T be locked is like the borders and whatnot. That's about it.
Jamaree (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=floo,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xPPIqE36,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2018-11-12T13:10:01.027+0000) > > And the fact that losing feels worse than winning feels good is just not really making it worth to play. That is kind...literally everything, that is how the human brain works?
Not entirely, usually people prefer to good feeling over the bad, and the good always feels better. It is literally why people do drugs and stuff, sure it is bad and hurts, but the good feeling you get feels better than the bad. People just remember bad things more than good things. I think people like to hurt, that's why they like losing.
: New Champion Leak?
Oh... they spelled his name wrong... Riot are actually apes.
: Can't hear basic attacks of Thresh
Long range attack doesn't have a noise. It is the one where he goes over head with his attack and slaps down. It is max/close to max range animation.
: well, no one knows the EXACT player count because Riot stopped releasing figures in season five, conveniently when all of their problems started the player count previously was 100 million and the playerbase in the west has dropped by an extreme amount, though I do not remember the exact figure. What came to mind was over 50% although the player count increased in eastern regions, eastern players tend to follow the trends of western players and are also more likely to abandon games as casual-only players, meaning a steady decline in profit for example, command and conquer, a popular, leading game years ago, has less than several hundred players on-line at a time. Star-craft, again, another leading game, has less than a few thousand at a time both games took the route of ignoring player demand and trying to maximize profits by bleeding the game dry, and the same trend is happening for league of legends as year by year, the playerbase gets smaller
But my point was, if Riot has 50 million players, we will just say that number, does that mean a game with almost 500k players isn't popular? That was pretty much my original point, they said Dota is not popular but it is decently popular, so is counter strike.
Moody P (NA)
: Sejuani - Please, god, not like this
She's prolly going to be a lot stronger now. She is getting a huge base damage buff and that E damage does as much as an ultimate. Hell, it will prolly be worth maxing first now, or at least a few points in w, like 3 then max e.
: Xayah Rakan Bracelets are shipping with misprints
Aint gonna lie, is it so hard for Riot to make like individual Xayah/Rakan things. Like what if I just want the Rakan or Xayah bracelet. Like I know, if they ever make a decent Xayah shirt, it will be a xayah and rakan shirt. I want the Xayah figure, NOPE gotta buy the Rakan one too. It is so dumb. I am not going to spend money on something I don't want. On topic, that sucks, specially since you paid pretty decent money for that and Riot is just like "Nope don't care.". Honestly it sounds like they're doing the whole "We don't think it is important so you shouldn't." sort of mentality. They think that small problem isn't a problem because they don't think it is a problem, so you're the problem for making it a problem.
: > [{quoted}](name=AXayahAccount,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PEIljUgR,comment-id=0004000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2018-11-07T20:16:41.668+0000) > > It has 400k players right now... how is that not popular? Counter strike has a little less than that at 380k. Both of those games are popular. 400k players compared to the somewhere between 40 and 80 million League has. 400k is low-to-middling, not broad popularity.
Comparing the most popular game in the world as the "standard" for popularity. Monster Hunter World was popular, and it has like 20k players now and had like 500k on release. Dota is popular, so is counter strike, they've held 400k+ players for a very long time. Also 40 to 80 million? That is such a huge variance that's not even funny and sounds 100% made up on the spot. Not saying that is or isn't correct, really doesn't matter. Because by those numbers EVERY game isn't popular. If we went off twitch alone CS is the 3rd most popular game. Dota is up there too as the like 10th most viewed. We also have to consider what riot considers an "active account".
Midg3t (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Stupafly,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PEIljUgR,comment-id=00040000000000000000,timestamp=2018-11-07T17:17:01.548+0000) > > I dont think DotA is dead lol > > Hell people even say league is dead XD Not dead, but definitely not popular, at least according to Steam stats
It has 400k players right now... how is that not popular? Counter strike has a little less than that at 380k. Both of those games are popular.
: Guinsoo's Rageblade now grants Armor & Magic Penetration
It doesn't give many stats for 3100 gold. What like 25 ap/ad/as? Plus 15 on hit. It is sort of weak for an offensive item.
: So the legendary lunar eclipse goes to leona...
Should have been Lunar Leona and Solar Diana. Throw the wrench in the cog.
: DON'T LET PEOPLE ACCEPT THIS ROBBERY!
Should be like a chroma. You must own the skin then for a small fee, say 650 rp for these skins you get to get the pajama version. Selling them as new skins is silly.
FridgeD (EUW)
: i cant provide proof, but i can say that i got knock out of Vi ult by poppy ult. but it only works sometimes. seems to be a bug/ coding issue.
Okay, that is a bug. Is it at the end of the charge, during the charge, beginning of the charge. Did she hit anyone else while you hit her? Did she hit a teammate or just you? A lot of factors need to be considered. This is also about Sion, not Vi. That said they're the same ability basically. I'm not saying you're lying, rather I am saying that maybe it was some very specific occurrence that happened that for some odd reason didn't make you un-ccable for a split second.
: Sion's ult thats "Immune to all CC" can be knocked back by Poppy's
Poppy's ultimate can not knock him back during his ultimate. Do you have any proof of this because I've played a lot of Poppy into that match-up and could never ult him back. It could have been during the end of his charge, when he is smashing the floor, that part may not be cc immune.
: Glasses are not a part of her body. Zeronis has her wearing the glasses in his concept art.
I mean, by that same logic the horns should never go away then. It's what they've decided to do I don't know what else to say. You can ask for the toggle, nothing wrong with that, but you have to be willing to accept there is a reason they went without the toggle.
: That’s a fine opinion. I would like the glasses on. A toggle option would mean we both get the choice we prefer. You’re suggesting that option should be denied to those who want it simply because it’s not what you prefer.
It's not that it is what I prefer, its that I understand the design choice for it to be that way. I could care less if she has glasses or not, I don't have the skin, however, I see why they didn't make it a toggle because it is thematic. It would be like allowing you to toggle her horns on or off at will.
: It feels arbitrary to discuss how different her accents between forms are when the bottom line is that they're there. I wanted this to be a discussion for people taking interest in the glasses, not derailing into nitpicking the details compared to her other skins. Even if Evelynn had no other skins to compare to, I would still be asking for this toggle. Details on one skin should not impede the features of another.
You asked to be "corrected if I am wrong" then get upset because he corrects you and call it arbitrary. You just want to have the glasses toggle on and off at will. That's fine, but they're the thematic choice for her demon shade, it looks fine as is imo. Just like the akali mask glowing is thematic for her shroud.
: K/DA Evelynn Glasses Toggle
No, keep it as is. Even in the video it is shown she has her glasses when she is "prowling" or it is darker, aka her demon shade. Only time it doesn't show this is the end when it goes from normal, to blacklight, to the orange light. During the blacklight she doesn't have glasses, during orange light she does. Point is, keep it as is because it is like her horns. You said some other skins have variation like safecracker always has her mask etc etc. This skin doesn't always need her glasses it is fine that when she demon shades she pops the glasses on. (she should jump in her car! I kid.)
: This is why no one takes mages seriously, its like they dont play the game or something. How much base mr do people have at max level? Search it up plz
All non-tanks have 30 +.5 per level. Tanks/bruiser types get 32 +1.25 per level. There are very few exceptions to the rule, but there you go. (For example Talon has 39 mr and 1.25 per level... no idea why.) So that's 39~ for non-tanks and 54.5 for tanks/bruisers. Armor has huge variance for both starting and per level. Some people get insane armor at level 18. For example Pyke gets 135 at 18. Thresh doesn't get armor per level because of his soul mechanic.
: I used to not afk, until I realized that literally afking matches would punish me less than possibly flaming my 0/11/2 support after 30 minutes of agony
Barcid (NA)
: It's a 4v5. It's been a 4v5 for 15 minutes. We have lost twice as many turrets as taken.
Just uninstall, easy solution. Or I guess leave the game and make a smurf...
: What is Your Favorite Ability for Each Key?
Q Dance of Arrows {{champion:203}} W Steadfast Presence {{champion:78}} E Bladecaller {{champion:498}} R Curtain Call {{champion:202}} My favorite of those 4 is Bladecaller, most satisfying ability to use.
: I don't understand adc?
adc really has always been that. They have safe damage, not the highest. The point is they take towers and dish dmg out and no one can do anything back as long as your team is protecting you.
: Some people need time to vent some people don't know when that time is.
Feel like after the game when everyone is gone is the best time. Just saying. After game shit shows are perfectly acceptable in my eyes anyways. Everyone can leave if they want to.
: Free skin for helping me pick my off-season champion! (details in post)
You should add an adc to your pool since you said you have jungle/support as your main with top/mid as your off role. If I had to recommend an adc to compliment an outplay, carry and skill expression champion I would say Xayah, for a number of reasons but for starters she meets your criteria. On top of that she will always be relevant because of her kit's design, which is to say the only way she will ever be bad is if Riot nerfs her so hard she is unplayable or all the adc items are impossible to build. Even in an early game meta like this she still has found a home, even though she has a pretty bad early game. For more specific reasons we can start with her basics of her design. She relies on both your own skill and your opponents skill to and find the perfect opportunity as one of her biggest strengths is she exploits mistakes really well. Going into each game most of the misplays that happen or miss timed abilities will be entirely your fault, which is to say missing bladecaller, missing your Q, miss throwing your ultimate, or simply miss placing your feathers from your autos. She rewards methodical play and tactical play as well as very high octane and "lcs big plays". You will notice, as you play more of her, you will always be getting better and better as you will learn to align feathers better, always keep track of feathers, position better and all around play better. For that her skillcap is very high as it is always a training grounds of you getting better than your opponents, more witty and crafty than your opponents to pull ahead. On top of that, in my opinion, she is a champion that will teach you how to play any carry role very effectively. She is a very good generalist adc with few weaknesses and few stand out strengths. Her weaknesses are built upon your own weaknesses, for example bad positioning, feather placement, ability timage etc. Her strengths are very much the same, good positioning, feather placement and ability usage. So it is entirely on you to force yourself to be better on her, which because she is a generalist, will make you better at many many different carry roles. Such as mages, supports etc. As an example, you will be better at landing Vayne E or Poppy E, or a Syndra E because you have already mastered the ability to draw a line from one point to another. Honestly, Xayah as a champion has taught me a lot about this game and in how "one tricking" certain champions can be extremely benefical to your entire game. Such as one tricking Riven will make you extremely good at animation canceling. With Xayah though she just seems to teach you so many healthy things you need to learn to be effective, she teaches you how to react and outplay with her ult, position with her e, kite and chase with her w, and land delayed skillshots with her q (Not much to learn there). In short, Xayah is a phenomenal champion that feels extremely rewarding to play as and satisfying to do well with. So, although you don't want bottom adc, I think learning a champion like Xayah is a benefical skill to have because it can translate to so many different aspects of this game. You want to carry, you want a high skill ceiling, you want to outplay, Xayah is the champion and then some. Whoever you decide on, winner of this competition or champion or whatever, I still think you should take the time and try her. Regardless of who you end up actually playing, even if just for fun I know you wont be disappointed by playing her.
: How did people charge their cell phones during The Middle Ages without electricity?
: So...I can't check for sure from home, but judging on your account level and what happened, I have a guess. As Full Brain pointed out, that 55 min match should grant you 302 base xp. However, the system is set up so that you can only level once per game. So if you were very low level (pre 10), and already close to leveling, and running boosts, then it's possible you missed out on some XP. If that's what happened, sorry about that! Also, totally don't mind helping...but that hostility makes it hard to want to do so :(
Question though, that makes sense that you can't level twice from one game but what if you are like 99% of the way to a level up, shouldn't the experience carry over. On the off chance you would have leveled twice shouldn't it be 99.9% of the next level. So for example from level 20 99% to level 21 99%? or level 20 50% to level 21 23% or something like that, to be more realistic.
: Player wishes cancer and death upon my entire family, yet continues to play
Easy, call him an asshole in game and get banned. Simple, right?
damabevi (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=AXayahAccount,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=oqAcMEkw,comment-id=000700010000,timestamp=2018-11-04T01:27:24.028+0000) > > I read that part, I meant it as in how "cool or nice" can this guy be if he literally left her in public with no way home or transportation. because people's patience has a breaking point
> [{quoted}](name=damabevi,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=oqAcMEkw,comment-id=0007000100000000,timestamp=2018-11-04T01:35:05.725+0000) > > because people's patience has a breaking point I mean like, you're there you'd know better. I'm just saying that's messed up. Does your mom treat you poorly? I mean, you seem to really dislike her so I am just curious. My dad was an absolute shit stain and kicked me out of my house like 2 times before I completely left, even now I don't have animosity to him, I still talk to him and have no problems with him as a whole. Sure he's a dick but I got over it. Just curious if she really is that bad to you or maybe she just has a problem with relationships, idk.
: Please do not nerf Jungle XP once again
Clear the whole jungle, get level 2. That is what is going to happen next!
damabevi (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=AXayahAccount,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=oqAcMEkw,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2018-11-03T20:02:44.612+0000) > > I hope you realize he isn't a "Chill and cool" dude if he dumped her on the side of a street. He is garbage, you most likely don't see everything that goes on between them. he was chill and cool for almost a year until he got fed up with her shit
> [{quoted}](name=damabevi,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=oqAcMEkw,comment-id=00070001,timestamp=2018-11-03T21:13:20.764+0000) > > he was chill and cool for almost a year until he got fed up with her shit I read that part, I meant it as in how "cool or nice" can this guy be if he literally left her in public with no way home or transportation.
: It's gender-based only in terms of having a choice. If players could choose the gender of the champion they play, most times out of ten it will be female, and that's saying something considering the male to female demographic of this game. Regarding the champs selected though it's more likely that men will just choose the better champion whereas females specifically want female champions to play.
I mean, I literally deviate towards female characters regardless of choice, I even said so. Regardless of that though it is still a bias. Like for men maybe gender is like a 1 in champ select, 1 being low 10 being high. For females maybe it is like a 3, meaning if the other things pass then they select it. Obviously everyone has their own bias for why they pick something, pros may be its good, and others cause it looks cool, etc etc.
: The year is 2018.
Silver Bolts deals physical damage now? Man that ~~Irelia~~ Shen nerf is really hurting him.
: I'll cosign that statement of female gamers only playing female champions. Every female I know who plays League of Legends only plays female champions unless I convince them to play a guy, and that champ has to be especially amazing for them to pick him up. {{sticker:zombie-nunu-bummed}}
It is gender-biased. Guys do it too for male characters in game. Its pretty common for a male player to want to play a male character and a female player to want to play a female character. That said people can obviously flip to a side, in either case each individual has their own biased of gender they prefer to play. For me I am a male who prefers to play female characters. Also I'm not saying just playing a female in an mmo, I'm saying no matter what game it is, a female lead character will attract me to play a game more than a male lead character, even if the male lead character game is a little better. So I too agree with your statement.
: How to fix Irelia in 3 step
Why did you do it this way? I had to literally go through and read the whole ability, then look at the cool downs then realized oh the mana cost is changed... Can't you at least circle what you changed please?
theTyger (NA)
: Worked soooo hard to avoid spoilers, thanks Rito... :( :( :(
You had to watch it live, OR don't bother get over it, see the winner and move on. The games totaled like 90 minutes at most. It was over in a flash so you didn't miss much.
damabevi (EUW)
: my mother broke up with her boyfriend
I hope you realize he isn't a "Chill and cool" dude if he dumped her on the side of a street. He is garbage, you most likely don't see everything that goes on between them.
Rhai (EUNE)
: Unless they go by the monthly one
They have both on their bio thing, both their Chinese Zodiac and normal Astral Zodiac.
: Shield bash is probably gunna break sion again in the top lane
Shield bash is not even that good. Just saying. Most of the time the shield gets destroyed or halved before you auto, then it does like 4 dmg.
Show more

AXayahAccount

Level 114 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion