GIJose65 (NA)
: I thought it was GD who has a hate boner for riven
> [{quoted}](name=GIJose65,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=cUmJaG0h,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2016-11-02T03:58:27.583+0000) > > I thought it was GD who has a hate boner for riven Thought it was just life in general.
Rioter Comments
: I feel as if G&B get triggered much more easily than we do.
> [{quoted}](name=laughup02,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=dyYEEd74,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2016-11-02T03:42:32.635+0000) > > I feel as if G&B get triggered much more easily than we do. If you dare question {{champion:92}} mechanics, the entire board there goes apeshit.
mirAcIe (EUW)
: Remind me, why do we need 10 bans again?
About time. Now I can ban either an unhealthy champion, or a troll pick, and feel okay.
Rioter Comments
CIocks (NA)
: Doubtful tbh, at least not for consumers. All that traffic in the air seems like a disaster. First off like you said accidents would be worse, since you'd be falling and potentially hitting cars beneath you too or crashing into the side of buildings. Not only that but air traffic is usually monitored and scheduled, adding 500,000 flying metal boxes would make that a nightmare. There are some things that could make it more viable tho. For example driverless flying cars would probably be less prone to accidents than manually driven flying cars. You could also set up "npn-commercial traffic zones" where private citizens can fly, leaving the upper areas for larger vehicles like planes. As for monitoring the airspace you could have each car talk to a server when its airborne (which would also help driverless cars prevent collisions). However I think it could be a great idea for commercial transportation and certain other vehicles like buses. Those are few enough in number and their routes are predictable and it gets large cumbersome vehicles off the road. It does bring up a similar question that driverless cars do, in that how many trucks can fall from the sky per year before its "too dangerous"? The technology would need to be extraordinarily reliable.
> [{quoted}](name=Clock Codes,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=EB9PI0pb,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2016-11-01T19:40:30.444+0000) > > Doubtful tbh, at least not for consumers. > > All that traffic in the air seems like a disaster. First off like you said accidents would be worse, since you'd be falling and potentially hitting cars beneath you too or crashing into the side of buildings. Not only that but air traffic is usually monitored and scheduled, adding 500,000 flying metal boxes would make that a nightmare. > > There are some things that could make it more viable tho. For example driverless flying cars would probably be less prone to accidents than manually driven flying cars. You could also set up "npn-commercial traffic zones" where private citizens can fly, leaving the upper areas for larger vehicles like planes. As for monitoring the airspace you could have each car talk to a server when its airborne (which would also help driverless cars prevent collisions). > > However I think it could be a great idea for commercial transportation and certain other vehicles like buses. Those are few enough in number and their routes are predictable and it gets large cumbersome vehicles off the road. It does bring up a similar question that driverless cars do, in that how many trucks can fall from the sky per year before its "too dangerous"? The technology would need to be extraordinarily reliable. I like this response since it comes up with theories of how it might be possible, but also addresses the current problems we would have with it. We would probably have to be highly dependent on technology at this point, as you mentioned in having it to be extraordinarily reliable.
: I thought the theory was that automated cars would come first. 20 years from now most cars will be automated. Chances of crashes will drop to a near zero. There is no need to have classes for flying cars if cars will be automated in the first place.
> [{quoted}](name=PPPPPPPPPPPP270,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=EB9PI0pb,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2016-11-01T19:34:34.106+0000) > > I thought the theory was that automated cars would come first. > > 20 years from now most cars will be automated. Chances of crashes will drop to a near zero. > > There is no need to have classes for flying cars if cars will be automated in the first place. I wonder how we'll be automate all cars. Any studies on this currently?
Rioter Comments
: ISIS targets children in Mosul with teddy bear bombs
Not surprised to be honest. These people believe that *anyone* that does not follow their demands is going against them and will kill to enforce their beliefs. They are pretty much the darker side of an "idea". You can't kill this idea, you can only try to change and reform it. Or suppress it.
: (Suggestion) Allow us to see the progress for Bounty Hunter mastery
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: [PLEASE LISTEN] league has become too baby-fied
https://cdn.meme.am/instances/62550245.jpg
: Wikileaks releases disturbing communications between faker and Tryndamere, proving worlds is rigged
: Lee Sin gets a new skin once again
I still think he should have fog of war permanently placed on him so he can be played like a true blind monk.
: "League isn't dying"
More fake statistics. Until I see actual data, I don't buy any statistics Riot tries to feed its players.
: > [{quoted}](name=Burnt Light,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=V6feOvnV,comment-id=0011,timestamp=2016-10-26T20:44:14.807+0000) > > In what category does it say that even mentioning the word "l*lis" which I am censoring considering how triggered you are over it, would automatically boost someone to a final warning and a 7 day suspension when it is not considered "Mature Content" under your definition "Pornographic material, depictions of gore, content that represents sexually explicit acts, and inappropriate under-aged content are still not allowed." However, the term that shall not be named is under controversy and your moderators resort to firm action at the mere mention of it. Why is it that the word itself, let alone a discussion, cannot be mentioned *at all* or risk a permanent banned? When I asked more information about it, you resulted in a critical action even though no images, videos, or any form of medias placed the thread under Mature Content and instead it was a discussion of what the word means due to the controversy in place. I find the action taken by the moderators for even mentioning the word ridiculous, especially compared to some of the worst case scenarios I've seen on these boards even before the update. > > Your moderators also did not seem to have a problem back then about it. http://forums.na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?t=2845287 > > That's right on your website and still able to be found to this day. > > So what changed? What happened that went from posting pictures of LoL champions in the form of the term, to now acting drastically at the mere mention of it? Is it cause of your moderator's personal beliefs, or is it an explicit policy? In which case, shouldn't you make a special note of the word being completely banned from the site or even automatically censored? > > And just so we're clear of any confusion, I do not support the word in question, nor do I like it. But this action taken by the moderators for a thread that was meant to require further information was out of line and likely acted on impulse. The rules about what is and isn't allowed in GD have changed over time. This is fairly well known to any GDer. Quoting something from the past is not relevant. Currently, we've made it very clear via our actions that the term you're referring to is not allowed on the Boards in any way. Riot classifies it under "inappropriate under-aged content" and we do our best to remove every reference to it and will continue to do so until such time as Riot tells us otherwise.
> [{quoted}](name=TheCurator,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=V6feOvnV,comment-id=00110000,timestamp=2016-10-27T22:04:43.553+0000) > > The rules about what is and isn't allowed in GD have changed over time. This is fairly well known to any GDer. Quoting something from the past is not relevant. > > Currently, we've made it very clear via our actions that the term you're referring to is not allowed on the Boards in any way. Riot classifies it under "inappropriate under-aged content" and we do our best to remove every reference to it and will continue to do so until such time as Riot tells us otherwise. Can you point to me where Riot classifies it under "inappropriate under-aged content" to the point where the word itself is now considered that? And I brought up the old thread because I want to know what exactly made Riot's policies change on the subject of the word? Since I'm assuming this is from the company's decision rather than the moderators. Correct me if I am wrong.
Kryptone (EUNE)
: Champions you feel unfair to play against. (1v1)
{{champion:92}} Disgusting utility where building straight damage into this mobile/CC betch leads to survival and assassin like damage. {{champion:157}} CertainlyT's wet dream. All he needs is normal crits and sustainability, and he'd be a second Lee Sin (in terms of too much utility) with 100% crit. {{champion:64}} Disgusting overloaded champion that will stay in the same state he is, otherwise the pros will throw a betch fit.
: trump will win no matter what
I feel like Clinton would win. Mainly because of how this ignorant population thinks she follows Bernie Sander's entire policy when that is not the case at all.
: Typical. As expected of someone who support's Trump's BS.
> [{quoted}](name=Sky of Smiles,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=yxaI8s5i,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2016-10-26T21:30:11.570+0000) > > Typical. As expected of someone who support's Trump's BS. That automatic assumption. Lol
Enosetc (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Burnt Light,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=yxaI8s5i,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2016-10-26T20:53:12.064+0000) > > Got a time machine? those are too liberal for you
> [{quoted}](name=Enosetc,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=yxaI8s5i,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2016-10-26T20:55:07.546+0000) > > those are too liberal for you Then fix it.
: Only if we get to transport the conservatives to the 1950s
> [{quoted}](name=vfactor95,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=yxaI8s5i,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2016-10-26T20:50:24.788+0000) > > Only if we get to transport the conservatives to the 1950s Got a time machine?
Akaviri (NA)
: If you really want to learn just go to Germany
> [{quoted}](name=WE Mizaya,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=yxaI8s5i,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2016-10-26T20:38:18.953+0000) > > If you really want to learn just go to Germany Get me a ticket.
: [10/18/2016] Official GD Rules
In what category does it say that even mentioning the word "l*lis" which I am censoring considering how triggered you are over it, would automatically boost someone to a final warning and a 7 day suspension when it is not considered "Mature Content" under your definition "Pornographic material, depictions of gore, content that represents sexually explicit acts, and inappropriate under-aged content are still not allowed." However, the term that shall not be named is under controversy and your moderators resort to firm action at the mere mention of it. Why is it that the word itself, let alone a discussion, cannot be mentioned *at all* or risk a permanent banned? When I asked more information about it, you resulted in a critical action even though no images, videos, or any form of medias placed the thread under Mature Content and instead it was a discussion of what the word means due to the controversy in place. I find the action taken by the moderators for even mentioning the word ridiculous, especially compared to some of the worst case scenarios I've seen on these boards even before the update. Your moderators also did not seem to have a problem back then about it. http://forums.na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?t=2845287 That's right on your website and still able to be found to this day. So what changed? What happened that went from posting pictures of LoL champions in the form of the term, to now acting drastically at the mere mention of it? Is it cause of your moderator's personal beliefs, or is it an explicit policy? In which case, shouldn't you make a special note of the word being completely banned from the site or even automatically censored? And just so we're clear of any confusion, I do not support the word in question, nor do I like it. But this action taken by the moderators for a thread that was meant to require further information was out of line and likely acted on impulse.
Rioter Comments
: Trump and Hillary Supporters - why do you support your candidate
Just the fact that these are our two options shows just how majorly idiotic and ignorant the majority of voters are...did none of the Clinton supports look up what a No Fly Zone is yet cheered for it? Did no Trump supporter try to look up just how much it would cost to build the wall and how Mexico would never pay that much for it? Did any policies get looked upon besides sheer scandals of both candidates? Seriously. There should be a specific standard of qualifications before voting nilly willy.
Rioter Comments
Akaash (NA)
: Well, most of the rioters are educated.
> [{quoted}](name=tiffybear,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=V1BPMeK7,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-10-26T09:08:13.205+0000) > > Well, most of the rioters are educated. You got jokes.
Rioter Comments
Spotty (NA)
: Heres a lesson for all of you uncultured idiots since you're up doing nothing
Huh, so this is what single middle-aged men waste their time on. Pretty depressing.
Rioter Comments
: Will Hillary Clinton take away my gun?
...Cut your damn toenails. Seriously.
Jikker (NA)
: He's got some League champion support even! http://img.online-station.net/_news/2012/1107/63891_boot_1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/fBgmeQb.jpg[img]
> [{quoted}](name=Jikker,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=2RBJFAEE,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2016-10-17T13:25:23.291+0000) > > He's got some League champion support even! > > http://img.online-station.net/_news/2012/1107/63891_boot_1.jpg > > http://i.imgur.com/fBgmeQb.jpg[img] It's obvious that he'd be the best president.
: Ah, EU. 10/10 http://www.auplod.com/u/poldua8017b.png
> [{quoted}](name=2yordles1cupcake,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=2RBJFAEE,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2016-10-17T02:59:54.593+0000) > > Ah, EU. 10/10 > http://www.auplod.com/u/poldua8017b.png Talking shit?
: you... do understand he's just an actor having way too much fun abusing our easily accessible ballot system...
> [{quoted}](name=ZenithEevee,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=2RBJFAEE,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2016-10-17T00:08:13.564+0000) > > you... do understand he's just an actor having way too much fun abusing our easily accessible ballot system... Remove this non-believer from my thread.
CIocks (NA)
: I heard he'd make brushing mandatory as well
> [{quoted}](name=Clock Codes,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=2RBJFAEE,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-10-17T00:05:36.703+0000) > > I heard he'd make brushing mandatory as well Yes. As it should be.
Rioter Comments
Romance (NA)
: TBH Trump is probably the last chance the Western Hemisphere has at existing in its current state before Political Correctness and Sharia Law overtake us.
> [{quoted}](name=Romance,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=4v8ENPry,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2016-10-17T00:00:09.830+0000) > > TBH Trump is probably the last chance the Western Hemisphere has at existing in its current state before Political Correctness and Sharia Law overtake us. Did you just assume my gender?
NotSid (NA)
: The Great Wall of Trump would take $25 billion to build
Same reason why they would vote for a woman who has constantly threatened Russia/China/Iran/etc. Selfish and idiotic ideals.
ADC Bard (NA)
: You mean besides a free skin ? {{champion:17}}
> [{quoted}](name=ADC Teemo,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=ksa2h66c,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2016-10-16T23:56:37.168+0000) > > You mean besides a free skin ? > > {{champion:17}} I don't play Maokai all that much. Lol
Rioter Comments
: Why is it a problem that assassins kill you "in less than 3 seconds" but it's not when mages do it?
Mages usually are skill shot orientated and lack an escape and are gimped by several factors (like mana). The mechanics that assassins currently have don't really rely on skill shots, most of their executions are point and click or simply AAing {{champion:11}} Then you have the fact that assassins usually have a way to escape and some even have CC or stupidly overloaded. Simply put, most assassins are easy to play in terms of executing a squishy player and escaping, when really, they should be difficult to play and be rewarded for skill and not face rolling.
: Silver league drains you of all emotion and sense of accomplishment.
> [{quoted}](name=Loli Crusader,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=ksa2h66c,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2016-10-16T22:25:31.625+0000) > > Silver league drains you of all emotion and sense of accomplishment. Sounds about right.
Rioter Comments
: Solo queing ranked is the biggest fucking joke ever
Best tips I can give you (Since I use to be in Silver V and now in Gold V) 1. Use face rolling champions. Seriously, don't try to be a pro, just use someone who will get the job done and snowball out of control. 2. Focus on objectives. This includes dragons and baron. Never neglect objectives. 3. Buy vision wards. If you're at mid or jungle, place them near dragon early or bot lane (since this lane causes the most problems when feeding). You'll want pinks near Baron in late game. 4. Use your trinkets. Always use them, there's no reason to neglect it. Helps with map control and denying vision from the enemy is an excellent advantage. 5. Gank other lanes even if you're not the jungler. Do not do it too frequently, but if you have recently killed your enemy laner and you're still good to go and have the capabilities of ganking, go ahead and do so, add pressure. 6. Tilt the enemy. You don't necessarily have to be toxic. But let's say you slaughtered bot lane and they never got a gank. Say, "Sorry about your jungler. :^)" You'll sometimes have bot lane bickering with jungle, making 3 players tilted at once. 7. CS is vital. If you can't CS, get into customization and practice until it's perfect. 8. With silver elo, you have to play as if your team is a ticking time bomb, cause that's pretty much how it is. Do not wait until late game to get objectives, be aggressive if you think you can pull it off and do not let your team mates feed (ganking other lanes, even if you're not the jungler, is an example of how to prevent other team mates from destroying the game.) 9. CC is vital in silver elo. If your team has no CC, your chances of winning drops unless the enemy team also has no CC. 10. If you're support, ward. I don't care if you're AP Sona, buy a sightstone and ward. 11. Stay quiet or mute the chat. This elo is known for flaming and trolling, best not to engage with team mates unless it's something important like "There's a ward in tribush." 12. Ping until you can't. This elo has a hearing problem, you can ping mia and your team mates won't hear it, so use the red "GTFO" ping to let them know clearly that the Leblanc missing from mid is about to sucker punch them. 13. If you can't win team fights, try to pick enemy players off or have someone split push. WARNING: Be mindful of how your team mates play if you decide to split push, some of these idiots will try to 4 v 5 and will blame it on you even if you pinged or said you were going to split push. If it's lag issues, then you'll have to get better specs. Practice in normals if you can.
Rioter Comments
Jamaree (NA)
: So who do you think would win a fight: One Punch Man or Squirrel Girl?
Rioter Comments
Zuphlas (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Burnt Light,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=pFqk33Z2,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2016-10-14T22:54:39.502+0000) > > Which park? It was like 6 years ago when I got dragged out with my family, I don't remember which one it was.
> [{quoted}](name=Zuphlas,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=pFqk33Z2,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2016-10-15T17:32:20.723+0000) > > It was like 6 years ago when I got dragged out with my family, I don't remember which one it was. Which state was it in?
Rioter Comments
Show more

Burnt Light

Level 30 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion