Catastrop
(NA)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
You don't deserve to have league installed if you are intentionally playing in conditions where a black out is even considered.
You shouldn't even be playing ANY game if you are living in those conditions. You know what you should be doing instead? TRYING TO BETTER YOUR CONDITIONS.
Shut up with your petty excuses.
|
|||||
Communist Toast
(NA)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
Eh, no need to be jealous of people that take the easy way out. When this kid's channel dies he's going to have nothing.
The only skills he will have: Clickbait (maybe he can be a BuzzFeed writer), match fixing (maybe he'll make the first League of Legends betting site O:).
That's about it.
|
|||||
BloodyTompon
(OCE)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
I dislike him as a person. Everything he does to get views screams con artist.
I mean hell, there is PROOF of him stacking his team with plat - diamond players while the other team is completely bronze so that he can get a "5000 MANA KASSADIN OP?" *insert female-kassadin with tits hanging out for thumbnail* video out and make it seem like it's an actual build path that you can go.
|
|||||
Busty Demoness
(NA)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
Or maybe because you are too thick to realize that Cartoon Network /=/ Adult Swim.
Not everyone can have an IQ over 10 I guess.
|
|||||
YCitizenSnipsY
(NA)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
5% IS a substantial difference.
In League terms, 5% is the difference between a champion getting gutted or left to keep wrecking solo q.
Glass cannon Yasuo mid works because you are fighting other glass cannon mids. Being tanky against that Syndra isn't going to matter. She's still going to kill you in two combo rotations + an ult. You just have to kill her before she kills you.
Being a glass cannon top against a Garen/Gnar/Darius. GLHF!
Basically, your argument of "glass cannon" doesn't really matter. Two different lanes with two completely different requirements.
Also, all the champions that you mentioned literally CAN'T build tanky because they don't have items that help them scale WHILE BEING TANKY. Yasuo can. It's cancer.
|
|||||
awdaf
(NA)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
Really wish people would stop posting this after every single champion.
It's not necessary. Some of the best practice you will get is in Ranked, where you are playing against equally matched opponents. If I play Kled in norms, I might completely destroy the silver and gold people I'm matched with. When I play Ranked in Diamond, I might get absolutely shit on playing Kled, since it's practically a different game at that point.
YOU also need experience playing WITH Kled. Banning him for two weeks doesn't help anyone. Not playing with him for two weeks doesn't help you.
Everyone just needs to shut up, let people play him if they want, and not care so much about the 20 LP you might lose or the 17 you might gain. It's really not a big fucking deal. The big deal is getting EXPERIENCE playing with and against a Kled.
|
|||||
Vistha Kai
(EUNE)
Dynamic Queue /=/ Champion Select.
Sure a Rioter is going around spouting that HE believes they are the same system, but at the same time he probably thinks all Adobe software is the same since they can all come bundled together as well.
Champion select ruined higher tiers of play. No one wants to support. No one was supporting at that level resulting in long ass queue times. That level of play is mostly filled with pro players queueing with 2-5 people.
REMOVE the new champion select from Diamond+ and just leave the actual Dynamic nature and I'd say the queue times would be a lot better.
|
|||||
Photos of Ghosts
(EUW)
Because reasons.
:^)
|
|||||
Hyrum Graff
(NA)
That's a problem, though.
DQ was supposed to solve the issues of solo q but instead it made the existing problems WORSE in some cases while creating even more problems on top of those old problems.
|
|||||
TsunamiWave22
(NA)
Firstly, I'll ask you to leave the boards and never return because we have enough retardation around here.
Secondly, I'll repeat what ExhibitD said: DON'T BRING UP YOUR FRIENDS IN AN ARGUMENT IF YOU ARE GOING TO BE PISSY ABOUT THEM BEING BROUGHT UP IN A COUNTER ARGUMENT.
Just makes you look like Hillary Clinton. No one likes Hillary.
|
|||||
Kürama
(NA)
The only people it will confuse are people like you who look for things to nit-pick.
Regular ass human beings know what he means.
|
|||||
Shadowatom
(NA)
Not our problem.
Riot claims they have an "open office" no head honcho for projects and people can choose to can whatever project they want.
So does Valve. You know, that more than likely multi-trillion dollar company now that maybe pisses people off once or twice a year.
It's almost as if you need your staff to be COMPETENT and know their fucking jobs if you are going to have such a model. Something Riot is showing they don't have.
|
|||||
Jeanne fan club
(NA)
No one was talking about graphics, you are grasping at straws to try and make Blizz look bad but I guess I can educate you anyways.
Heroes of the Storm runs on a modified SC2 engine. You know the map editor for SC2? That, but better.
SC2 is terribly optimized and will never get better. That means Heroes of the Storm will as well, unless Blizzard makes a new engine for it which has been unheard of until Overwatch which runs on it's own engine.
|
|||||
Project omen
(EUNE)
Stop using common sense! He needs his internet points to feel justified in making a shit post god dammit!
|
|||||
Marshbouy
(NA)
Depends on the game mode you get put into and Blizzard already said that it is something they will look into since they believe the system isn't giving you enough credit for winning certain game modes or when you are the underdog.
|
|||||
|
Jeanne fan club
(NA)
No one cares about the systems other games use. Overwatch isn't "other games."
It's a Blizzard game, and they use Dynamic Queue. They have been since Heroes of the Storm beta. Sure, they made strides to cut back on the "dynamic" nature of it, but it's still not solo queue. So your point isn't valid.
CS:GO, the most popular game right now in the world (I say that since Riot has stopped boasting about their numbers so I assume they dropped hard) uses a Dynamic Queue. I can play with as many friends as I want.
Maybe it's YOU that hasn't looked at other game systems, or maybe you are too thick to actually understand them.
I can tell you right now, that you probably played the first 2 days of Overwathch's ranked system. No shit there were leavers. People at that point were used to the drop in and drop out nature of Quick Play, and I believe it was also in Competitive during beta. I have been playing Overwatch the last two days for 8+ hours and have only seen MAYBE 10 leavers (most because groups drop out).
Really nothing to worry about. Unless of course you want to make a shitty thread to get fake internet points and feel good about yourself.
|
|||||
Elikain
(EUNE)
Except it is a perfectly fine excuse.
We had competitive mode in Overwatch's beta. Players said it wasn't rewarding enough. So Blizzard pulled it and worked on it.
Imagine that. A multi-billion dollar company admitted that the messed up, pulled something from the game, implemented it later and its 90 times better than it was in beta.
Sure, leavers are a problem. But if someone leaves I can leave too within a minute with 0 penalties.
Yet we are going to sit here and ignore everything blizzard did right?
From the very first day competitive launched, if someone left BEFORE the spawn gates opened the match just ended. It never existed. Yet it took Riot 6 years to think that /remake was something fair for the players to have.
I can see EXACTLY who is in a party. Riot will never give us that. It's "too toxic" to know who is playing together.
I have built-in voice comms and I can communicate with my team in real time. Riot will never give us that. Again, they "think" it's too toxic for us.
This isn't an issue of Dynamic Queue working, it can work in any game and Overwatch does it damn well. The issue is the companies making the system and their willingness to listen to player feedback. I feel Blizzard will make bigger strides in the Dynamic Queue scene, they have been working on it since the Heroes of the Storm beta. But they listen to player feedback. Riot tends not to.
|
|||||
Dextix LT
(EUNE)
I'd disagree with you saying it's not good.
It's good in Overwatch, terrible in League.
In Overwatch's case, you can use your argument. It's a new game designed from the ground up as a TEAM game. People know that when they play their first quick play match. BUT that is how a dynamic queue should be implemented. From the beginning.
League, on the other hand, started off as "I'M the carry. Listen to ME cause I have the best calls." Not to mention players in China and Korea were picked up for teams based off of their SOLO play division. Why do you think Korea is having such a backlash against DynamicQ? They can't tell who is ACTUALLY a great player. This has been engraved into the player base SINCE ALPHA and Riot is trying to change the mindset of the players.
Also just going to point out that Blizzard doesn't try to actively hide who is a premade. I get to see, before the match even starts, who is in a party together. Of course, this will never happen with League since "It's too toxic to show who is in a party", or "The technology isn't there yet."
|
|||||
|
Jeanne fan club
(NA)
Bullshit LOL. "I'm going to boost you, ONE competitive point at a time."
Not to fucking mention, Blizzard already worked out a way to STOP boosters. Want that shiny animated player icon? Then you HAVE to stay within the top 500 players. Good luck getting boosted there and staying there.
You're going to boost people 500 competitive points so they get their golden weapons? Doubt it.
You're just some shitter making a shit post to get shitty internet points. Case closed.
|
|||||
Slap me Satsuki
(EUW)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
Finished "The Voice" in... 2014(?) in third place, ran a YouTube channel where she uploaded all of her covers, just recently released her first EP with her band "Before You Exit".
Edit: She was also heavily into gaming culture, as the post points out, being a fan of League of Legends and many other old school titles.
|
|||||
Arcane Azmadi
(OCE)
1). Time constraints.
2). Time constraints.
3). Time constraints.
Also, they have been showing us their work. Every single champion in the past year has had very detailed and lore filled animations to go along with their release. So I mean... yeah...
|
|||||
Academy Kayn
(NA)
No. I'm not. Art team can keep making skins, lore can keep making lore.
Right now they have the "live team", a team that works on PBE patches, a team working on the DQ system, and a team working on the new client.
All at the same time.
If they REALLY wanted to get DQ fixed, they would reduce the live team size, reduce the PBE team size (patches can take longer, people won't complain) and merge the extra resources into the DQ team. This includes merging the new client team into the DQ team. I don't want a new client before my ranked experience is fixed.
|
|||||
AwesomeChad
(NA)
This is an example of Riot doing what we call in system design a "Direct Conversion". This means that the brand new system immediately replaces the old when it is ready.
What they should have done, and I'll get into it later, is called a "Parallel Conversion", but like I said, later.
Direct conversions have one major upside: They are fast to implement and relatively cheap. On the down side, there is no way for you (or the users for that matter) to catch any bugs or errors until we are using it, like we are now. This can have MAJOR disruptions in the company when shit doesn't work (sound familiar?).
Now, what they SHOULD have done is a parallel conversion. With a parallel conversion, you KEEP the old system and the NEW system running together for a few months. This allows users and creators to dabble in the new system and report any bugs. This, of course, takes more time to implement the new system AND costs more (we are running two systems that achieve the same goal AND having to maintain both until the new replaces the old. Not very efficient business wise), BUT you catch a lot more bugs. The upside as well with a parallel conversion is that if you find the new system not fit for release, you can easily pull it to keep working on it and then bring it back up later for more user testing along side the old system.
Now I know what people are going to say "We tested it on the PBE". Yes, because PBE testing 100% matches the amount of people on the live servers. Get outta here.
It could have been really easy to make this work too. They could have given users incentives to play on the NEW system to test it so they could collect data. "Play X amount of hours in the new system this month and you get Y% discount in the store/merch store." "You get X% bonus IP for playing in the new system for this month as a thank you for helping us collect data."
But they didn't. They took the fast and cheap way out, and now they are suffering the consequences.
|
|||||
|
Academy Kayn
(NA)
It actually can though.
It baffles me how people assume "You CAN'T just do x" when time and time again other developers (even in different fields) show that you CAN. Companies with smaller teams have done it so please just stop spoon feeding excuses to Riot.
You know what Valve did with Dota in a year? MADE THE GAME RUN ON AN ENTIRELY NEW ENGINE. Gee, I wonder where they pulled the resources for that out of. Maybe, I don't know just spit balling, smaller team for patches and a larger team for what actually mattered?
Riot on the other hand: "Let's have 5 small teams working on 5 separate projects at the same time! Cause that's totally efficient!"
|
|||||
| Rioter Comments | new Comments | Views | |||
TheWhiteWølf
(NA)
He has parts coded as minions, walls, a dash that you can extend the range of WHILE in the moment of the animation, an auto attack extender that you spawn....
A speck of grain in any of the spaghetti breaks him.
|
|||||
TyRamos
(NA)
You act like Riot is a tiny company with only 15 employees.
There are constantly changes going on. There are constantly new papers entering and existing desks.
Want another example? Bungie fucked up on a patch note saying Auto Riles in Destiny would be getting a 4% damage buff across the board. Was actually only 0.4%.
One department can make mistakes. Maybe once you get a real job other than sitting on boards you'll realize how things work {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}}
|
|||||
FacerollKatarina
(NA)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
If you actually read the fucking post it says that it is 99% going to get reverted.
But then you wouldn't be able to get your pointless Internet points, would you child?
|
|||||
1Maza
(NA)
You're also only taking a small sample size. What about EU, Korea, China, etc.
And yes, one split is early. We still have IEM, second split, another big tournament (I think), Worlds.
THAT is the full season.
|
|||||
sp441
(NA)
Really? What's the VR set that Valve is pushing, with the motion controllers? I can see it now "Valve announces the long awaited HL:3, only playable on this one Valve endorsed VR headset. Get your copy now for a whopping $800."
Seems like a big enough "gimmick" to me.
|
|||||
ChaoticPinecone
(NA)
Using outdated stats to try and make your point relevant: Nice one!
Too bad RECENT statistics show Riot raking in $1B in the 2015 year. Ouch, almost as if you had to go back far enough for that to not be valid.
Blizzard knows what matters: The game.
Riot doesn't know what matters. They blow all their budget on eSports hoping it will keep players attracted while not doing anything to make the player experience better.
|
|||||
LOL Spammer
(NA)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
Oh no, someone broke your safe zone by having a different opinion.
Should we all report him for being toxic so that your feeling won't get hurt again son?
|
|||||
|
YCitizenSnipsY
(NA)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
And then there are the biased ones like yourself that are fine with everything Riot does because once you finish your Bachelor's you hope your goodwill on the Boards will secure you an internship.
Yes, the game has progressively been worse since S3. You know what S3 had? The largest viewership a tournament has ever seen (Worlds).
You know what S3 had? Balance. There weren't 20 required ban or pick champions to the point where every match is the same now.
But you're right. A stagnating player base is TOTALLY fine, and everyone else is wrong because people don't feel like posting a thread that will get ignored anyways. Love your retarded logic mate.
|
|||||
|
YCitizenSnipsY
(NA)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
Getting bigger? I doubt it. Viewer counts on LCS and Worlds has only gone down since S3. S3 Worlds still holds the record for the most viewed eSports tourny. So your point is invalid already.
It's stagnating and going down. Quickly.
Riot is making the same mistakes a Blizzard: Not listening to community feedback and just doing w/e they want and not admitting their mistakes along the way.
But hey, at least they have you white knights to always defend them.
|
|||||
Steven Mcburn
(NA)
Then you were looking at the wrong Tribunal LOL.
"False bans" were hardly a thing. If you were a tawt, you were banned and you could easily appeal it with support and get smited in private.
What even is a "false pardon"? The Tribunal is community driven. If the community doesn't agree with banning or punishing someone, so be it. YOUR opinion doesn't make something false.
They also implemented the system where you get e-mailed your case that got you banned from the tribunal near the end. Again, get some facts straight before trying to make a "bogus case" as you would put it.
|
|||||
UrPalAl
(NA)
"Don't dare say anything to defend yourself or the other innocent people just wanting to play a game. This is a safe zone, and if you dare say anything to the tawts, you will be banned while they continue their toxic rages every game."
Got it.
|
|||||
|
UrPalAl
(NA)
Automated system doesn't work. It has proven that.
Tribunal punished trolls that the automated system never will be able to. This has also be proven by the influx of trolls that don't say anything but are toxic as fuck in their gameplay.
Maybe get some actual facts.
|
|||||
ChocadillyDoo
(NA)
That won't work. Trust me. ADC/Mid and you are 90% of the time going to get ADC. Top is slightly always in more demand than ADC.
If you want to pretty much 100% your specific role you should use: x/Mid (where x is your desired role)
unless you want to play mid... in which case.... gl.
|
|||||
John Viande
(EUW)
I found Lyte's secondary account guys.
You know how other games handle that issue? Low priority queue's. Or bans. Either works. Not rocket science.
|
|||||
VengefulMarv
(NA)
^ This so much.
Beta was so amazing, right? Xin release OP as fuck? It's okay, only lasted two weeks before he got nerfed.
LB fucking retarded? It's cool, within 48 hours there was a hotfix nuking her into the ground.
These days we have to wait 10 months just for them to publicly acknowledge that something is a problem, then another 12 for them to say that they are actively working on a fix.
|
|||||
yoniame
(EUNE)
You're right... I mean they ONLY get a billion dollars a year these days. There is NO WAY they could afford to implement something that will actually improve the player experience, thus retaining and attracting new and old players, thus making those happy customers more likely to spend money.
As someone that has taken multiple business and object-oriented analysis courses.... can we stop making this fucking excuse? Truth is: They have the funds to do whatever the fuck they want. They just choose to dump most of it into LCS and take a major loss because "screw the people that got us this far."
I mean shit, if you are going to make excuses for Riot at least take the maymay route: the technology just isn't there yet. Because frankly, with Riot, it isn't. Once the new client hits they literally have no excuses for not having these basic things anymore.
|
|||||
Nikoyopu
(NA)
No, it really wouldn't.
|
|||||
Tahngarthor
(NA)
This is false information now.
A pretty long time ago they made it so that all accounts pull from the FULL champion list to get rid of this exact problem.
|
|||||
Baron von Jiggly
(NA)
No. No it's fucking not. Stop thinking the Hextech crap is going to be "good and free"
Congrats, YOU GET FREE SHARDS. Not the full fucking skin. Have fun paying for all the keys to your crates to not get guaranteed shards for the skin/champ you want and destroying the crappy shards for like 10 fairy fart dust when the skin you want costs 2000 fairy fart dust to create.
"Well I get it free for 7 days if I redeem it!!!!111!"
Wooooow, or you could have just paid $5 and bought the skin. Like everyone already does.
Anyone from the PBE will tell you that the system is retarded and TERRIBLE for the amount of money you put in and what you get out from it. It's literally CHEAPER to buy $100 RP than it is to gamble on cases. Because they aren't "free". If they say otherwise it's because they have a Riot hand so far up their rectum.
|
|||||
Namazu Ebisu
(EUW)
It's really not though. You just don't seem to know how the PBE patches actually work.
We get a new patch what.... every 3 weeks? 4? Around there. This equates to about a patch a month. Since you claim to be "part of the PBE crew" then you'd notice how things cycle around there.
For example, since skins are brought up:
1. Skin gets released, it's playable but has no splashes.
2. Lots of balance changes happen at the same time. This can include items and champs.
3. Week 2. Skins have splashes. Some reverts. Some bug fixes. This is the LAST week that they have to patch bugs. This is generally the last week that changes and major bug fixes are pushed out.
Everything after week two is very small TINY buffs, nerfs, skin changes. This is literally how ANY piece of software development cycle works.
Research into how things work instead of saying people aren't doing their jobs helps arguments.
|
|||||
Drugoth
(NA)
There would be no performance issues because no one is asking to zoom out the entire distance of the ult.
There wouldn't be performance issues even if you did zoom out that far unless you play on a potato.
It doesn't cause serious issues. If you don't believe me download any camera tool and zoom out 4000 units in a replay. Much issues, such serious.
TL;DR: You're a moron that eats up anything the hive mind sends your way and are incapable of free thinking.
|
|||||
KnightsKemplar
(NA)
He makes several good points if you don't know anything about how the game works when you zoom out....
Literally grab any camera tool and view a replay. You can zoom as far out as you want. You'll notice (if you don't play on a potatoe) that your FPS won't dip below 60.
You will notice:
1. Minions and other characters do not animate when in the fog of war. This is intentional.
2. You might see off the map (such bug much wow)
3. Everything is smaller which is why you only zoom out to a certain point.
Gypsy, while I love the man.. very intelligent and I'd bang if he was willing, makes frankly AWFUL points. It's yet another "We don't want to do it so here is a simple to come up with excuse that people will eat up."
The point of the other thread asked to zoom out just AS FAR as Jhin's does. I believe Jhin's only goes out 3500 units. that is more than enough to get those close range snipes, and close enough to not impact FPS or show bugs.
|
|||||
Macilento
(EUW)
Can I steal an already popular thread too mommy?
|
|||||
ShinobuElveszett
(EUW)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
I play off-meta supports all the damn time so get your "haven't seen it on LCS" crap out of here and stop acting like people play like that. They don't. Kthanks.
Second of all, I guess you can't read but he said autolocks. It's not that hard to have a system that detects a pick in a second or less, and allows you to kick them if it was a troll pick.
I guess you have to have an IQ above 10 to actually read though instead of just spew nonsense onto the boards.
|
|||||
Akenero
(NA)
CIit Yeastwood
(NA)
You DO realize you are just using words that Riot spews to baby the community instead of actually fixing problems right?
You also assume that the OP has a chat ban which isn't even said in the post.
|
|||||