Ahri Baka (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Celtic Vi,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=aMEAgxrF,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-05-16T02:10:15.349+0000) > > Skin Spotlights, surr@20, Necrit, and 2 others said it was 100PP link lol
> [{quoted}](name=Kitsune Kawaii,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=aMEAgxrF,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-16T02:16:59.525+0000) > > link lol They updated the surr@20 and Skin Spotlights. Just checked. You can watch Necrit's video. He thought it was 100PP as well because there were several sources stating that it was available through PP. Regardless, i'm just screwed. And devastated. I was looking forward to this skin the most. Wasted $40. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vt_UNvcqIs here's the link to his video, but it really doesn't matter at this point. (P.s. It's not his fault. He was going based off of information that was given to him by multiple sources.) I really like Necrit.
Ahri Baka (EUNE)
: Nope No one mentioned that Lux is obtainable by Prestiege points , it was announced that she is the skin of the event that comes with Points , like Vayne/Akali/Kai'sa skins
> [{quoted}](name=Kitsune Kawaii,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=aMEAgxrF,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-05-16T01:47:32.468+0000) > > Nope > No one mentioned that Lux is obtainable by Prestiege points , it was announced that she is the skin of the event that comes with Points , like Vayne/Akali/Kai'sa skins Skin Spotlights, surr@20, Necrit, and 2 others said it was 100PP
Rioter Comments
DaBooosh (NA)
: I care so much... oh please come back I beg you Riot cares a lot too. Please don't quit, I am begging you Riot Games is too {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}} You are not the center of the universe, stop it.
> [{quoted}](name=DaBooosh,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ZMNAyAU5,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2019-02-06T19:14:13.384+0000) > > I care so much... > oh please come back I beg you > Riot cares a lot too. Please don't quit, I am begging you Riot Games is too > {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}} > You are not the center of the universe, stop it. I am the senate! Iā€™m just pissed off. Let me have my moment. :3
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: IS THERE A CHAMPION THAT CAN HARD CARRY AN ENTIRE TEAM?!?!?! REEEEEEEEEE!
Excuse the grammar btw, I must've had a seizure while writing that ;-;
Rioter Comments
Unker139 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=boltoms,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ze6ylzkN,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-09-20T14:43:01.427+0000) > > I figured that would be the first reply, yes I understand that. But there's ways to prevent that tunnel vision. For instance, if the game took into account the amount of wards placed, objectives taken, assists, etc. There's way's around score whores. It's not just KDA though. Wards placed just for the sake of placing wards doesnt help. Taking an objective while your base is under attack is not good play. KDA is good but too high is bad so there is a "target" KDA. In addition, each champion, play style, and matchup would need to have a different calculation of what a good game is. You don't want to get demoted for a loss if you play well and your team loses, but would you accept not getting promoted if your opponent plays bad? After all, in that case you didn't actually earn the promotion. You are suggesting that riot should define good play and build that into their ranking system. What will you do if riot's definition is not the same as yours? Will you change your play or complain that they got the definition wrong?
> [{quoted}](name=Unker139,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ze6ylzkN,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2018-09-20T15:48:57.352+0000) > > It's not just KDA though. Wards placed just for the sake of placing wards doesnt help. Taking an objective while your base is under attack is not good play. KDA is good but too high is bad so there is a "target" KDA. In addition, each champion, play style, and matchup would need to have a different calculation of what a good game is. > > You don't want to get demoted for a loss if you play well and your team loses, but would you accept not getting promoted if your opponent plays bad? After all, in that case you didn't actually earn the promotion. > > You are suggesting that riot should define good play and build that into their ranking system. What will you do if riot's definition is not the same as yours? Will you change your play or complain that they got the definition wrong? Again, as I stated. I understand about making good plays and having good macro overall. But, i'm talking about the good players that do get brought down by the poor plays of their team. I didn't want to pull this card, but I have to. There are plenty of players that are 100 times better than the elo they are playing in. But because of the poor decision making of their teammates, they are left to bear the consequences. I am severely held back by a lot of the players in my elo. I carry a good amount of games and have decent macro. I understand when to go in, and when to make proper objective calls. So it frustrates me when I hard carry a game, and I can't get my team to respond. I never, badmouth my team or say anything negative towards them because I understand that making a teammate angry does not help the end goal. So, I don't get why I have to be punished for a player(s) that can't play properly. That's what frustrates me to no end I don't really play that much ranked, but eventually I will climb out of bronze. (actually pretty soon because I nearly win or carry every ranked game that I play) I'm just frustrated by the fact that I suffer losses because of incompetent players and get demoted. But, there you go. Now I sound like an asshole. But, once I get outta bronze, ill climb pretty fast hopefully. :P
: Would inspire people to only care about their KDA, when this is a team game.
> [{quoted}](name=WhiteUranium,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ze6ylzkN,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-09-20T14:00:38.575+0000) > > Would inspire people to only care about their KDA, when this is a team game. I figured that would be the first reply, yes I understand that. But there's ways to prevent that tunnel vision. For instance, if the game took into account the amount of wards placed, objectives taken, assists, etc. There's way's around score whores.
Rioter Comments

Celtic Vi

Level 239 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion