JuiceBoxP (EUNE)
This exchange made my jaw drop. What the hell, rito....
rujitra (NA)
: Well, to handle it even on a "one-guy" basis requires that there be someone fluent in dutch to determine a few things: * Is the player actually speaking Dutch * Is the player speaking Dutch to the point that this likely was meaning "kiss" and not an attempt to game the system * Is the use of the word in the sentence appropriate, or is the user actually using the word in lieu of another word to be "edgy" * etc Even if the cases are rare, the only way to reliably and accurately solve these cases is to have someone fluent in dutch reviewing them.
"i taught myself dutch so that i can tell people to "kys" in league of legends and escape punishment" is the hoops these people will jump through to pretend they're correct. no way to tell unless someone who actually speaks dutch reviews it! or a person with a brain...
: The problem is that basically gives everyone an excuse of "I was speaking Dutch," which I've already seen several times. What if my log is part Dutch and part English? What if I'm abusing the fact that that phrase is a well-known phrase in multi-lingual gaming, and I'm getting a free pass to use it?
here's a crazy idea: why not read the whole chat and use context clues? were they speaking dutch before/after they said "kys"? were they flaming someone before/after they said "kys"? wowee! such hard! i'm not surprised rito, mods, and the support staff think this is difficult....
rujitra (NA)
: Because for one, the boards are not the place to file a report. For two, there is no way for anyone to verify any part of your story, it's just heresay. For three, even if we *could* verify it, there is absolutely no benefit to publicly shaming someone behind their back.
Pxerkza (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=rujitra,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=nnt6rEV2,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-07-17T22:52:14.222+0000) > > Someone else violating the rules doesn't make it okay for you to violate the rules back at them... did you see the first image?
> [{quoted}](name=Pxerkza,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=nnt6rEV2,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-07-17T22:52:56.492+0000) > > did you see the first image? Probably didn't even read the thread. They just blindly defend each other all day.
EpicOrg (NA)
: \o/ Reporting players via support tickets really works! \o/ Praise the player support team!
yea, i never get feedback in the client anymore from my reports, so i've started sending in tickets instead. two of the more recent reports went from playing multiple games every day to no games for the past 6 days. guess I was right after all, trash client.
: Hi, I'm the original "absolutely unnacceptable and completely livid" guy.
You can always tell how ridiculous a ban is by how many mods show up to back each other up/tag team defend the punishment. You got shafted, but rito doesn't make mistakes. They'll twist everything around to make it justified. It's a zero tolerance word! Just kidding, if it was ZT word, you would have gotten a 14 day ban! Just kidding, it was a ZT word, but it's only 99.9% a 14 day ban! Just kidding, it wasn't actually a ZT word but it's still deserved! Hoop after hoop after hoop.
Voldymort (EUNE)
: You know what i do when i have a question that only riot is likely to know the answer to?
This guy was so willing to tell you about the 3 day ban we all saw leaked from reddit, and then when you pressed for more info, he immediately got defensive and accusatory. They have **NO IDEA** what is going on, and they really screwed the pooch with the Avengers bans. Not all people who spoiled Avengers got the 3 day ban. Not all people who spoil movies in general get banned. They cannot define which spoilers for what media after before how much time has passed deserves a punishment, because of course that is ridiculous. So they can't give more of an explanation because they have none. Probably one rioter overstepped his boundaries after getting avengers spoiled for himself in a support ticket and handed out a ban, and instead of saying that's a mistake, they just want to issue threats with no clear details. It's like social media banning hate speech, etc. No real definitions about what is rule-breaking in these situations. They are in over their heads because they can't just say "we don't know/we screwed up." I know the mods on here aren't rito affiliated exactly, but ask them, and they say it's not bannable, because of course it shouldn't be bannable. Ask someone else, they'll say it's bannable. NO ONE KNOWS ANYTHING! It's hilarious.
Hotarµ (NA)
: There have been a lot of mixed answers over the past few months/years and unfortunately I couldn't find Riot's _official_ stance on the matter. On one hand, it doesn't directly impact your gameplay experience and it isn't exactly personal harassment akin to toxicity. On the other hand, in most cases the person is doing it just to be a jerk and that's not cool. I fall somewhere in the middle, I'm not entirely sure how I feel on it, but if I had to make a decision I think it probably **wouldn't/shouldn't be punishable.** When popular media comes out (such as books, TV shows, movies, etc.) you always run the risk of people talking about it, and regardless of their intention it's just something you have to accept when you use social media or popular gaming platforms such as League. I know some people have been punished for this recently with _Endgame_ but I don't think that's an on-going thing, someone probably just sent in a support ticket and a Rioter chose to place a small ban on the player. ____________ [Here's a comment from a user on Reddit that I really jive with, the title of the post was "Is spoiling Avengers in-game a reportable offense?"](https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/bhko7l/is_spoiling_avengers_ingame_a_reportable_offense/eltn2ih/) >Riot can't start banning people over this, because then they have to answer way too many hard questions. >What media should spoilers be bannable for? All films/books/shows? The biggest ones right now? What counts as the "biggest". >How long before talking about possible spoilers stops being bannable for? 3 days? A week? A month? More? >This is why the onus of avoiding spoilers needs to be on the person who's...avoiding them, not on everyone else, nor Riot to enforce it. Not spoiling things is an honour rule, not a real rule. [This one too:](https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/bhko7l/is_spoiling_avengers_ingame_a_reportable_offense/eltp1sl/) >No it's not and it shouldn't be at all. >Ye it sucks to meet unsocial ppl who take fun in spoiling stuff espcially from such hyped movies/series. >But the best thing you can do is either not go online at all or just mute ppl If you afraid of something happening like this.
Are punishments based on rito whims then, if rito can decide to only punish some of the people who spoil certain things? They don't punish all spoilers, and they didn't even punish all end game spoilers.
: I literally didn't. I used the fact that cops are allowed to shoot your dog if they deem it a threat, and if you retaliate they're allowed to arrest you. They just don't know how to read/interpret very well. As you can see by the literal post of the op. It's a skill set they've yet to acquire. fun fact, my significant other runs an animal sanctuary, and I adopt animals from abusive homes. I'd never literally tell someone that I'm going to kill their fucking dog.
> [{quoted}](name=Emelie Cauchemar,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=HEyQwv4L,comment-id=0004000000000001,timestamp=2019-05-01T04:38:54.515+0000)I'm going to kill their fucking dog. OMG You are a horriblle person!!! Mods! Mods! Come quick! Your dogs are in danger!
Mr Elessar (EUNE)
: Bannable?
Going full ad into what was probably a rammuz/malphite team? I wish!
Hotarµ (NA)
: Yes, players still get punished frequently. >They get reported by multiple people and I have yet to see the pop up saying a player was punished!  Multiple reports do not increase the likelihood of a punishment being administered, and the IFS message does not pop up consistently. __________ For what it's worth, I think inters and trolls need to be punished much more severely and much more consistently, but it's not exactly an easy thing for an automated system to do consistently.
Is there anything players can do to assist in the process (NOTE TO ALL WANTING TO MISCONSTRUE MY WORDS: I DO NOT MEAN “GAME OR MANIPULATE OR ABUSE THE SYSTEM”) aside from in client reporting or are we just SOL with the crummy lenient system we currently have? Edit: I think part of the probelm is that as players, reporting does not feel impactful. We rarely run into the same troll/inter across multiple games, but there is regular trolling that occurs. So we experience trolling, report the person, and move onto the next game, and more trolling occurs from a different player now, therefore, “report did nothing”. Maybe our report actually did something in reality (also we both agree that the system is lenient, so players tend to doubt in the absence of communication), but it doesn’t feel like it because we still see the same behavior in our games. Communication from rito is severely lacking, automatic feedback is limited and inconsistent, leading players to feel helpless and hopeless. I’ve seen posts over on the league subreddit about how one of the most satisfying feelings in league is getting that automatic feedback alert. I think more of those consistently would go a long way to improving relations in the community.
rujitra (NA)
: You are claiming that your reports are so much more important than everyone else that you deserve to bypass steps in the process. And no, you are not reporting a player, you are reporting a specific game and that player's actions in that specific game. Your report tickets simply waste time from players that actually need help and you aren't getting any special treatment from doing so. That's selfish and rude of you to the millions of other players who use the system as it is designed to be used.
where am i claiming that? how can i bypass steps in the process if as you claim, that's not how support tickets work? have you filled out a ticket before? there is literally a box for "what is the summoner name of the player you'd like to report" that you have to fill out. i'm sorry you feel that way. again, you must not fill out tickets or know what you're talking about, because there's another tab you have select what you're reporting the PLAYER not the GAME for, and guess what? the options include literally every option you can report the player for in the client too. verbal abuse? yep it's an option. afking? yep it's an option. inting? yep it's an option. "hate speech"? even that is an option! again. i'm sorry you think it's rude, but you should look what all goes into filling out a ticket before you make things up.
rujitra (NA)
: Well, no, because there is no "trifecta" and one game of negativity isn't likely to result in a punishment. Especially given they didn't use any hate speech. Bottom line is it increases negativity and flaming for no real benefit. If you didn't deserve to be demoted, one AFK game wouldn't have been the reason you were demoted.
assuming it's just been one game and not just another in a pattern of behavior. hate speech is in the eye of the beholder. that is some of the dumbest reasoning i've heard. why have loss prevented or remakes then? one server crashed game wouldn't have been the reason you got demoted, it was bound to happen if you deserved it. that person afk'd from the beginning? coinflip!
rujitra (NA)
: I don't think you read what I said. You are not getting some special treatment by submitting a report to support **unless** you tell them that there is something so extreme going on that it needs immediate intervention (threats of harm, etc). Otherwise, the support agent won't review the report but will just manually flag the game as reported. You don't get any special treatment. Your reports are not more valid or more important than anyone else's. By the way, I wouldn't be surprised if your tickets are either given a low priority or are responded to using automated means if you continually abuse the ticket system like this. It's like the boy who cried wolf - when you actually need to submit a ticket, you're likely going to be very low on their priority list to look at.
i never claimed my reports are more important, please don't make things up. hyperbolic language is inappropriate on this board, i'm surprised you don't know that. what you're saying doesn't make any sense either since you're reporting a player, not a game for review when filling out a ticket. i know, i filled out three in a row yesterday. i'm sorry you don't like it. i don't like having to do it either. believe it or not, i would rather have inter and afk-free games.
rujitra (NA)
: "I'm about to get demoted and you're playing like shit, why don't you just AFK and be a decent person since you can't play"
"no" and then report that person for the negative attitude, verbal abuse, hate speech trifecta. they will be quickly banned - problem solved.
rujitra (NA)
: For what reason can you not use the normal reporting feature? Riot support does not do "extra" when you report in a ticket, save for extreme circumstances like real life threats. Otherwise, all they do is mark the game to be reviewed by the IFS as if you had reported end of game. This is likely one of the reasons that the queue is backed up - players using the ticket system to report things that can be handled just fine by the in game report. The only exception is spoilers, which can't be handled by IFS (by the time they gathered data and trained, the spoilers wouldn't be a problem anymore).
well considering you already admitted there are at least two exceptions where sending in an extra ticket would make a difference in your reply bending over backwards to defend the normal reports, i think i'll continue drawing a real person's attention to the negative behavior in my games. the in client reports are garbage at detecting nonverbal manners of trolling or are way too lenient. this type of behavior ruins way more games than "hate speech." so until they decide to take it more seriously, they'll just have to deal with the queue being backed up.
: You want to report for an "endgame" spoiler? REALLY?! SPOLIER: Voldemort dies!
i saw it opening night, it wasn't spoiled for me, i just like protecting the fields of justice from all forms of bigotry!
TrulyBland (EUNE)
: So I guess you prefer arguing over a video game's rules over curing cancer and establishing world peace, nice.
please be careful. hyperbolic language is not tolerated on the boards. i do not want to see you punished. "Hyperbolic or mocking posts are generally unhelpful and and definitely not appropriate on the Player Behaviour subboard." - Evangele you may want to edit your post so that it does not get removed. riot is very consistent with their punishments and so it is only a matter of time.
Melven (NA)
: Is using color as an insult considered racism?
If I called someone a "fat yellow nerdy bitch" would that be considered racist?
Melven (NA)
: Is using color as an insult considered racism?
Hate speech is zero tolerance until it's not apparently. Another example of rito selectively enforcing their rules.
: If something is reported on the Boards, when is it reviewed/things can be reported multiple times?
This thread has been locked because the original poster has had zher problem solved. Good job everyone.
: hey why riot support ingoring my tickets?
hey get in line buddy, i had 3 games IN A ROW that required tickets to be filled out this afternoon.. first a guy ran it down top all game as teemo and did it on a different champ the game before (had to send in a ticket), then someone else spoiled end game in the next game(had to send in a ticket), then someone in the third game afked after dying two times (had to send in a ticket). still haven't gotten any replies on mine, so they're pretty backed up.
Evangele (NA)
: {{champion:267}} Heya, So looking at this it was mentioned in the removal message the reasoning behind why it was removed. _Hyperbolic or mocking posts are generally unhelpful and and definitely not appropriate on the Player Behaviour subboard._ As per the sub-boards [Guidelines](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/OjEUxbwH-player-behavior-rules-update): "We understand someone's behavior may be abysmal, or that someone critiquing your behavior can feel like an attack. Please remember to respect the person behind the words, even when those words are something you wish to express disagreement with." & "Replies that are overly negative, dismissive or combative are not appropriate and may be removed. " Also references to "reparations" do go slightly past an appropriate level in terms of what the word usually refers to in response to an issue such as the one that was being discussed in the thread, however that was not the main reason the post was removed. In answer to "I don't understand you can remove a comment about me being offended by someone's words and leave up everyone else's comments about being offended by other words." I would say that the others posting in the thread were generally expressing offense and discussing the topic at hand, while this response was in fact mocking them with a hyperbolic expression meant to minimize and trivialize their opinions and discussion. If you have any more questions, please feel free to hit up one of the moderators on our [Discord](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification)
im sorry you felt like i was not genuinely offended. i will do better to be offended in the future. i will not discuss reparations anymore either. i will leave those discussions for the poc's who are due them and the allies who would be paying them, and definitely not on these boards. thank you for taking the time to explain it to me.
: I'm 9-1 in my last 10 games. Still hate that griefers - who I'm benefiting from - aren't punished.
Please don't switch from being a sore loser to being a sore winner now. omg smh i can't stand these boards sometimes.....
: > [{quoted}](name=Ph03n1xb1rd,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=IP8bNlzN,comment-id=0000000000000001000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-27T20:11:32.902+0000) > > Could you please explain me what do you feel when you see a word you do not like in an online competitive game from a random stranger who has no idea who you are and will probably never meet you or have any effect on your life except this one game? > > I just don't get it. Why do you even care about him? How can a random word offend somebody? Because it's not a random word. It was ch osen deliberately with the specific intent of being abrasive to the person they're talking to. That's not random.
how was it deliberately chose for a specific person? was that person talking about how they were on the spectrum earlier, or are you offensively and in bad faith!!!! attributing a motive to someone? that's not a very nice thing to do. how would you like it if i accused you of something like that?
: Way too many of you are making light of disabilities to insult people who make errors.BLANKing STOP.
It's hard to follow all these rules. I'm sorry. I won't be uncivil anymore. I am offended by the things you are offended by now. See we agree! Now we all can get along. Ban the mean words.
Rioter Comments
: Player Behavior? How about RIOT's behavior?!
unreal that people are downvoting this. racists and sexists abound. they put all the focus on "toxic" people in game so that they dont have to answer for the injustices they are guilty of.
: ***
And simply claiming "i'm offended, therefore..." isn't a sound argument at all.
: > [{quoted}](name=Kamille W,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=IP8bNlzN,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-04-27T19:31:09.224+0000) > > I feel you but censoring that word seems extreme. I thought it was already censored though. I can understand reasons for wanting it to be censored but on the other hand it doesn't seem right to me. I don't think censoring the word cancer is right either. Those aren't insults by themselves which is why I am torn apart on the idea of censoring them. If cancer is censored, then other disabilities and diseases being used as insults should be too. I don't really advocate censorship, but Riot should be consistent in how they handle these things.
I agree with you now. Please ban words like "flu" and "common cold" because I'll snap emotionally if I see them in game ONE MORE TIME RITO!
Arcade Lulu (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=DJColdCutz,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=IP8bNlzN,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-27T19:35:07.685+0000) > > And just cause it bothers someone else doesn't mean it has to be censored. Imagine being so entitled that you thing ableist slurs making fun of disabled people shouldn't be censored Ableist slurs are like homophobic slurs etc They are 0 tolerance and should be censored
Imagine accusing someone of the "disability" in question of being ableist because they aren't offended by words like you are. I don't need you sticking up for me. Just mute and move on. Using ableist unironically. Wowee...
Hotarµ (NA)
: And that cute little attempt at a backhanded remark is exactly why it should be censored. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about and you're trying to pass it off as "Oh, well I don't get offended, so nobody else should lol" which is unbelievably ignorant. Educate yourself, homie.
Do you speak for everyone? I don't claim to, even though you accused me of it as a form of harassment.. Sure seems like you're claiming to though.
: > [{quoted}](name=DJColdCutz,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=IP8bNlzN,comment-id=000000010000,timestamp=2019-04-27T19:36:08.884+0000) > > Not surprised. Whoop dee doo. Neither do you. You've got a pretty poor attitude right there. The real problem isn't the fact that someone that actually is on the spectrum might be upset, the problem is the ignorance of calling people autistic as if to suggest that they're stupid/clueless/idiotic when that isn't in any way shape or form w hat autism really means. words like idiot or r%%%%%ed are just as inappropriate(and censored as you can see), but there isnt the same level of ignorance. At least the know what they words they're using mean.
: > [{quoted}](name=DJColdCutz,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=IP8bNlzN,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-27T19:35:07.685+0000) > > And just cause it bothers someone else doesn't mean it has to be censored. And just becuase it's okay with you doesn't mean I should simply tolerate it.
Don't tolerate it. Mute it. Why do you need someone else to censor it when you can just mute it yourself?
Hotarµ (NA)
: As someone who is also on the spectrum, it bothers me. You don't speak for everyone.
Arcade Lulu (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=DJColdCutz,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=IP8bNlzN,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-04-27T19:25:43.948+0000) > > as someone who is also autistic, it doesn't bother me. what now? we have to cater to the lowest common denominator? look at america's school system to see how that works. don't be so sensitive and just mute people. Just 'cause it doesn't bother u at all doesn't mean it doesn't bother someone else
And just cause it bothers someone else doesn't mean it has to be censored.
: Way too many of you are making light of disabilities to insult people who make errors.BLANKing STOP.
as someone who is also autistic, it doesn't bother me. what now? we have to cater to the lowest common denominator? look at america's school system to see how that works. don't be so sensitive and just mute people.
EvansR (NA)
: What to put in comments of a report?
just put super racist stuff and endgame spoilers in there. i just use it to vent.
: It's simply because the community has gotten extremely sensetive, up to this point we're punishing people for criticism, sarcasm etc.
the mods and rito are extremely sensitive* the community just reports people that tilt them in the hopes of getting back at them where it hurts.
: The State of Memes & Games
Is this guy trying to make everything too confusing to read by making new comments instead of just replying to the same one?
: what does raging back at them do to help the situation exactly?
literally nothing, and yet that's still more than rito does about the situation. they go out of their way to punish negative words and "hate speech" and bend over backwards to avoid doing anything about actual trolls/inters. soft inting players ruin 100x more games than "hate speech" does.
: > [{quoted}](name=Infernape,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AAfzHeEA,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-04-16T01:27:54.066+0000) > > I've had people blatantly run it down mid, with six tears (may that "strat" rest in hell), reported them and sent in a support ticket for good measure but they're still playing. > > But when someone flames, I rarely ever get one. The last one I got was well over a year ago. Let me guess when you sent in that support ticket, they told you "they are going to look at the match" or something to that effect.
Hang on a second. Are you implying that they use a script and don't really do anything?
The3cho (NA)
: How Often Do You Get an Instant Feedback Report? (Gauging the System)
I only get like 1 every couple months, which is weird, because run into so many trolls/toxic people every day that I have to report. I always make sure to tag "Hate Speech" too so I know they're for sure it will get reviewed since that's what rito prioritizes.
: > [{quoted}](name=The Djinn,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=RPj9kwca,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-04-11T16:23:18.471+0000) > > When we see common misspellings of hate speech used in contexts where there's some question about whether or not the word is intended as a proxy for another word, we err on the side of caution. I'll point out that there was no punishment associated with this removal. > > So while "We were playing Counterstrike and I fragged him" would not be subject to removal, "stop being a frag" probably would. In this case there was sufficient uncertainty about your use of the word "nagger" that we opted to remove. To be fair, I see the upset with the OP. Nagger is a genuine word that exists in the dictionary, and it's being removed for being too close to something else. The line of 'close to misspelling of hate speech' seems almost made up as it is not a mispelling... especially if in the context (which is not present here) it could be clear that it is someone who is nagging. His example of kiss shouldn't be considered a misspelling of kys... at least in my opinion. However, as the moderators of the boards, you are free to be as Orwellian as you want I guess. EDIT: Then again it could be obvious he was just trying to get 'away with' saying a racial slur with a close word.
Unfortunately, "Orwellian" is not a slur to these people. It's their goal.
: > [{quoted}](name=Ph03n1xb1rd,realm=EUW,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=RPj9kwca,comment-id=000100000001,timestamp=2019-04-11T16:52:06.558+0000) > > Added the context too, I think it fits the definition of the word, but since I'm not native English i'm not totally sure... You can't really say "not native English speaker" and then turn around and follow it with this post where you start tearing into the moderators while explaining to them what should and shouldn't qualify as nagging: > [{quoted}](name=Ph03n1xb1rd,realm=EUW,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=RPj9kwca,comment-id=0001000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-11T16:56:16.025+0000) > > "especially as there was no real nagging on the part of the person being quoted" - Wow, your definition of nagging is totally different than mine... > > Also, the nagging was not only related to that SINGLE post, but generally how he comments. OP giving totally enough information of a match (I think it was too much, since it was easily traced back, so it is kinda naming shaming...), and he told that he is probably hiding something, since he could not find the match (because of his own fault). > > So he was clearly nagging. I'm a nagger too, I nag all the mods since they are unbelievably inconsistent..... So one of these statements is a lie.
Soft bigotry of low expectations. Racist.
: > [{quoted}](name=DJColdCutz,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=ui4AzI80,comment-id=00000000000200000001,timestamp=2019-04-13T14:19:58.653+0000)Hypocrite. Rules for thee, not for me. Specifically: "in this manner." Faking posts saying a member of the moderation team told them to kill themselves and not revealing the deception until later is *very* different from making a harmless joke in the comments.
How can you say it was harmless? You of all people should know that in 2019, whether a joke is offensive is determined by the audience, not the joke teller. This is a serious board and so I take this board seriously. Seriously. And I am seriously uncomfortable that someone who doesn't seem to be an ally to marginalized people has a position of authority on this board.
: > [{quoted}](name=PlzGodKillME,realm=EUNE,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=ui4AzI80,comment-id=000000000002,timestamp=2019-04-09T14:43:03.093+0000) > > look another troll moderator so many of you these days maybe someone should look into this problem .. Eh. I'm a person and community member just like anyone else, and that means I can joke around here and there. You'll noticed I did address the topic and engage in conversation in the thread rather than just leaving a snarky comment. :)
"As a friendly warning, do not meme on Discuss the Boards in this manner again. This is a serious board, not GD, and this is not appropriate behavior for this space. It creates community misunderstanding and makes our lives as moderators harder." Hypocrite. Rules for thee, not for me.
: > [{quoted}](name=Cry Medusa,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=aGtE1MJe,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-04-09T03:05:34.090+0000) > > My first game log is probably worse, but again, nothing bad nor worth being reported or banned over. You do realize that this is totally ridiculous logic, right? You're trying to convince us that the log contained no bannable behavior by telling us that it contained no bannable behavior. I can't fathom why anyone would actually post such a thing, except to troll. Well, you got us. Good job.
why would his game 1 chat logs matter, even if he was toxic in them? in the chat provided for game 2, he wasn't toxic at all. you're telling me trolls can falsely report someone for toxicity to get a review of the account triggered, and if they were ever toxic in the past, they can get punished off the troll reports? im gonna do that to everyone i see from now on then. hope to see you on the rift!
: I asked for game 1 chat logs. That is because we can not do a informed assesment until all the data is shown. That is why I did not make any commentary one way or the other, I just requested the additional information that is there and yet not shown.
in the chat provided for game 2, he wasn't toxic at all. why would his game 1 chat logs matter, even if he was toxic in them? you're telling me trolls can falsely report someone for toxicity to get a review of the account triggered, and if they were ever toxic in the past, they can get punished off the troll reports? im gonna do that to everyone i see from now on then. hope to see you on the rift!
Show more


Level 190 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion