: why do weeaboos care more about drawn women than actual women
If I was a woman I’d prefer 2d guys over real ones, they’re all pretty gross.
: why do weeaboos care more about drawn women than actual women
Aren’t you a weeb Mr. Shurblez...? Also somethingsomething socially inept somethingsomething 2d can’t betray them idk, good question.
: A headcanon doesn't have to be 1:1. However, there is a difference in crack-headcanons (like weird shipping) and serious headcanons that have a high possibility rate of being canon. I don't think I have to explain to you which ones are respect in this kind of forum and which ones are laughed at (or at least tolerated). Your headcanon disregards several already established canon premises while my theory fits in more or less flawlessly into the established set of rules and canon elements. Also, Janna is not an celestial candidate because there is no confirmation of spiritual-posession in her lore. She's a magician with an amplitude to wind powers. Nothing more, nothing less. Good grief, if you want to make a statement, at least read the souce material first. You say a headcanon is about fitting puzzle pieces. Yet my version fits as it changed nothing on brand's personality, origin, currently canon lore and whatever, while yours simply cuts parts of the pieces away just for the sake of mashing them together in the disgusting excuse of what you call a serious headcanon. Also, trick question: what is the difference between a fire elemental and a star elemental? Both spiritual beings with terrifiying fire powers that posess a human body. I changed pretty much nothing. I added depth. Save your ideas for fanfiction writing, but please do not pester an area of the board dedicated to serious canon discussion with them.
I changed pretty much nothing. I added depth.
: Please make Taric's V-neck scale with armor.
: We should kickstarter a class action lawsuit against RIOT for going back on their word.
: If RIOT doesn't bring back solo queue as promised, file a complain with the Better Business Bureau
: Since you're buffing most armor items
Make thornmail an active and not a passive. Why is this so hard to do?
: > [{quoted}](name=Doneyear,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=FwTM6AAX,comment-id=00010001,timestamp=2015-06-13T01:00:18.629+0000) > > Capt'n, Source came OUT 11 years ago. You don't start making new shit the second you start releasing it. I'd say it's been 5 years since they've been working on it. Maybe less. > > Also hai Capt'n. > > E: Also this is just an interface update. While it looks nice, the overhaul is gonna be mostly aesthetics and more user friendly. Except for new DotaTV. That shit looks dope if you ask me. When the fuck did you get here. Also, I'd argue Source 2 has been in planning for at least 10 years. "But they don't-" This is valve, they take forever to work on things. Source 2 probably had some half-assed, hyper-alpha working model five years ago which they took one look at and said "Yeah we need more time". Meanwhile TF2 is left to die. Poor baby TF2.
> [{quoted}](name=CaptainMårvelous,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=FwTM6AAX,comment-id=000100010000,timestamp=2015-06-13T01:04:18.986+0000) > > When the fuck did you get here. > > Also, I'd argue Source 2 has been in planning for at least 10 years. "But they don't-" This is valve, they take forever to work on things. Source 2 probably had some half-assed, hyper-alpha working model five years ago which they took one look at and said "Yeah we need more time". > > Meanwhile TF2 is left to die. Poor baby TF2. I mean yeah there's an argument for that as ValveTime isn't just a myth, so you could be right; but that's kinda beside the point. The fact is that Valve has been working on this engine, which albeit pretty fucking nice in the previews with the new updated UI and everything but it isn't going to fix those servers that have been shitting the bed in the last year with major packet loss. Maybe gameplay wise there will be less bugs.
: Such is what happens when Valve finally finishes the Source 2 shit they've been working on for...what? Ten years now? How long have they been working on this thing?
> [{quoted}](name=CaptainMårvelous,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=FwTM6AAX,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2015-06-13T00:49:16.753+0000) > > Such is what happens when Valve finally finishes the Source 2 shit they've been working on for...what? Ten years now? How long have they been working on this thing? Capt'n, Source came OUT 11 years ago. You don't start making new shit the second you start releasing it. I'd say it's been 5 years since they've been working on it. Maybe less. Also hai Capt'n. E: Also this is just an interface update. While it looks nice, the overhaul is gonna be mostly aesthetics and more user friendly. Except for new DotaTV. That shit looks dope if you ask me.

Doneyear

Level 30 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion