Anchobi (EUNE)
: >>taking flash on yummi >>super low damage on yummi >>klepto everywhere you are just bad man, its not matchmaking, but as usual not your fault right...
flash on yuumi is good (you can escape after your carry dies in a 1v3) not sure what super low dmg is, i don't make the in-game states klepto is not what I take on yuumi, you're just baiting
: no.... dude just give it up. if you're going to make a claim, expect to be called out if it sounds like bullcrap. you want to say they do because any other explanation as to why you're losing them doesn't fit your narrative. this argument flat out makes no sense either considering if they forced you to have a 50% winrate, with you having a 24% winrate, should you not be WINNING games to "force" it back to 50%? and just based off your item builds i can totally see why you arent winning, mr deathcap yuumi. whats also worse is your "winstreak" only being 3 games. https://na.op.gg/summoner/userName=DONTHURTMEPLEESE
lol 24% winrate my butthole. And deathcap yuumi is a great build. You should just max your AP and share the benefit. Sry if you haven't caught on yet.
Kai Guy (NA)
: First up. The gap skill makes in this game is instantly visible. hell, your argument that look at awful teammates… admits that low skill screws your ability to win. I don't even have to point to the many streamers who publicly share their smurf to main climbs, in an individual match a large gap in skill is visibly negative to players. Climbing is inherently impossible if it was truly forcing 50%. This should be very simple and easy to understand logic. Also, I call you out because I understand burden of proof. Riot claims to use MMR. The concept of MMR is well documented. You can study it learn it look at the math behind it. Doing so you will end up going back to Elo. What your claiming? Violates the principles behind Elo derivative systems. Your claims "Its forced 50%" that would break the system. The basic math concepts used for Rating generation are built with their roots in probability theory. If you destroy the natural odds of who the system expects to win by making it so the system decides who will win... then you don't have a method to self correct accounts ratings anymore. If your not correcting ratings to the right ranges that represent expected skill… ratings are inaccurate measurements of skill. This is not a complicated train of logic but please let me know if you would like to see some of the algorithms or need terms explained. Now, here are issues I see that you need to be able to answer. So your forced system. Ratings are not accurate. W and WE variable creation are broken. So Ro is inaccurate and then RN is inaccurate. That's why I say its a broken system. The basic stat used for measurement of skill has no logical math to support its generation as an accurate value. If you cant rate skill accurately how the hell do you rigg matches to force 50%? WR is out the window completely if the system riggs it. So your raiting and WR mean nothing in forced 50%. how's it getting data to throw matches? Stats? Not remotely good measurement of skill because skill gaps create massive stat gaps. Yet some how your forced system needs to read players "skill" accurately enough to predetermine the way games end... prior to the lobby even being constructed. Burden of proof, is on you. You have to present something plausible here that supports your claim. Forced 50%. Is unwieldly, you have to make a proactive system. Has to accurately generate skill on accounts which it then trys to squash or boost the wrong directions, literally the opposite direction you would see them want to be moving in MMR systems. You end up with folks floating around a 50% win rate if you just let them playin In Elo. This happens naturally with time K factor slowdowns and all that. So... why force it? Plus.. If all riot wanted was to smash players into 1 closer range? They could just Slant K factors. That's a massively lower effort solution. You at the least need to provide a motive and support that statement but... that argument typically falls apart. Its not confusing. All I am asking is if you believe this system exists to explain how it would function. I ask because the concept violates Elo theory. If not probability theory then What's used to make it work? how does it predict a match prior to the match? If you cant support your claims you should expect to be treated as a unreliable source of information.
Why are you even here? Stop writing essays and take like... a basic philosophy course on dialogue.
: Atleast stop giving the player worse teammates when they have too high of a winrate, make the person who has a high winrate play against AND with people of an equal to or higher elo and see if they can keep up. Have players with a poor winrate play with and against people of their own elo or slightly lower. (higher winrate teammates) This doesn't force 50% winrate nearly as hard since a team is only as strong as its weakest link, your job is to not be that weakest link and do your best. And its easier for someone to have to carry a tilted person who is higher elo than someone who is more likely to not have any idea what they are doing and how they should help the team.
> [{quoted}](name=Tahminatrix ,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=FV7uIzuX,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-05-26T08:25:32.539+0000) > > Atleast stop giving the player worse teammates when they have too high of a winrate, make the person who has a high winrate play against AND with people of an equal to or higher elo and see if they can keep up. > > > Have players with a poor winrate play with and against people of their own elo or slightly lower. (higher winrate teammates) > > > > This doesn't force 50% winrate nearly as hard since a team is only as strong as its weakest link, your job is to not be that weakest link and do your best. > > And its easier for someone to have to carry a tilted person who is higher elo than someone who is more likely to not have any idea what they are doing and how they should help the team. see, this guy gets it. RIOT doesn't even force a 50% because they don't have a better solution. They're just lazy.
Kai Guy (NA)
: You need to submit some actual proof for your statements? Why would riot build a forced system to accomplish literally the same end goal of MMR? Are you aware of the difficulty in building an automated proactive system? Far as i can tell,you have to throw out probability theory if your forcefully rigging results. This should be a fair statement to make, Do you disagree? Probability theory is whats used to build Elo and MMR systems. What do you suggest is used for the WE variable generation in a forced system? How exactly do you accurately track stats when winrates are an inaccurate metric by the very nature of rigging the winrates for players? See... I can answer a lot of questions people present to me for MMR. I cant for your Forced 50%. Do you have any proof of it as a logical or more viable system to use then MMR. " it's true RIOT forces a 50% win rate." Ok. evidence? Answer some basic questions on how that system functions? Prove to the boards your not talking out your ass if you don't want them to treat you like your doing so.
I'm super confused by your statement. It's like saying disprove god doesn't exist. Do you want me to become an actuary for RIOT? I have a real job. It's true RIOT forces a 50% win rate, that' anecdotal and unfortunately true. I could prove it through painstaking and time consuming data gathering, but it's so blatant why would I do that? Everybody knows it's true - including you.
: Again, please stop forcing 50% win rates
You white knights are ridiculous. Riot forces a 50% win rate on everything, including un-ranked games. Down voting the truth? Sad.
: or you just climb to the rank you belong in. If you belong in diamond you will get diamond.
> [{quoted}](name=GreenTeaAndPoro,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=FV7uIzuX,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-05-26T08:28:01.713+0000) > > or you just climb to the rank you belong in. If you belong in diamond you will get diamond. I'm not talking about ranked.
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Donthurtmepleese,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ENlUssoR,comment-id=00000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-14T21:38:01.762+0000) > > If it's in the terms and use I would say it exists? Confused. "It's in the ToU, therefore it is." —René Descartes ######no
What? The tribunal exists and I'm confused why you claim it doesn't.
Ratpie (NA)
: Ya you pretty much are providing evidence of your own guilt, and you seem to struggle with understanding physical ownership and software licensing. You do not actually own anything in the case of online licensing, just access.
*slow clap* ? I don't know, I got my money back - sorry that offends you
: > [{quoted}](name=Donthurtmepleese,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ENlUssoR,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-06T20:36:48.375+0000) > > Just FYI - The tribunal is specifically mentioned in 2.1.3 of the Terms and Use agreement. So? It no longer exists and has nothing to do with your punishment.
If it's in the terms and use I would say it exists? Confused.
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Live2LetDie,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ENlUssoR,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-01-13T06:35:19.951+0000) > > is the tribunal even a thing? Hasn't been for years.
Just FYI - The tribunal is specifically mentioned in 2.1.3 of the Terms and Use agreement.
: is the tribunal even a thing?
Just FYI - The tribunal is specifically mentioned in 2.1.3 of the Terms and Use agreement.
: There hasn't been a Tribunal in years and Tribunal never actually determined punishments anyway lol I feel like Tribunal has nothing to do with your concerns.
Just FYI - The tribunal is specifically mentioned in 2.1.3 of the Terms and Use agreement.
Rioter Comments
: Hello, could you stop queue me with bad players?
All these comments, sad. Will no one share in my view that queues should not be weighted on the fact that you did well? Will no one admit that there is obviously a daily counter that determines whether you queue with carries or epics? Does no one agree that one day is carry and another is epic? This has been the same way for 3+ years (maybe 5) and you all accept it. Will no one agree that RIOT manipulates queue's to make you feel bad, then make you feel good? Do you *really* think this is just me? Of course not.
Rioter Comments
: Tribunal fails 100% of the time
Well, I didn't know they changed the name so, fine, Instant Feedback System. Regardless, I still completely disagree that my language was reason for punishment (I don't think anyone checked it, just that the system is set up when someone reports you regardless of a valid reason, you get punished). That leads to a lot of false positives, probably more false positives than there are true positives. It also allows for pre-made teams to game the system whenever they get butthurt. Lastly, I would argue the language is accepted by the FCC probably as TV-14 or some similar rating. I'm not going to provide legal advice, but suffice it to say when a vendor makes it impossible to access something you purchase, you have the right to refund which in most cases will supersede something like a ToS. Consumer fraud is something completely different because it **must** include a _misrepresentation of fact_ to benefit the individual/group. If you're interested in fraud there is a lot of information on the ACFE website, including some cool statistics - https://www.acfe.com/
: First: The Tribunal is no longer active. Chat based toxicity is dealt with by the Instant Feedback System. Second: Chat like this is not allowed: > Donthurtmepleese: christ > Donthurtmepleese: noobs these days > Donthurtmepleese: we could have if u didn't suck yes > Donthurtmepleese: dumbass > --- > Donthurtmepleese: you're not laning anymore noob > --- > Donthurtmepleese: noob > --- > Donthurtmepleese: tough internet guy > Donthurtmepleese: pussy irl > --- > Donthurtmepleese: this whole team is too triggered to perform > --- > Donthurtmepleese: pathetic Third: A 10 game chat restriction is your first warning. Take heed of it. Fourth: This: > I got $700 refunded for denial of service is an actual crime, Fraud. You lost the right to the money when you bought the RP and it was given to you. You then exchanged the RP for unlocking content (that you have no actual ownership of) in the Store.
As I explained - it was denial of service. That's not fraud lol, that's consumer rights. Imagine if you bought a spoiler for your car (you wouldn't, but imagine), and they also install something that turns off your engine if you don't drive safe. You have the right to get a refund [charge-back] for the spoiler. Please don't be afraid to get a charge-back on denial of service, regardless of "actual ownership" as you call it.
: Neeko OP?
Neeko is OP to generate sales. Invisible, Invulnerable, Teleport, this is Riot's new champ "must-haves" to generate sales.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: Why you should quit League (opinion)
This is more true on a daily basis
: Why you should quit League (opinion)
Rioter Comments
: what the hell is with the login and home page
It corrupted my 3 TB external drive a couple weeks ago, btw. Thanks
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments

Donthurtmepleese

Level 58 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion