: The support ticket has been already sent. You can't delete peoples comments because you do not agree with them. Who are you to usurp right whether someone meant something or didn't? You are here to control the flow of threads, not to interpret it. I said that the argument was idiotic because I think that the argument is idiotic. I don't care if you felt offended for whatever reason precious snowflake, you are not here to dictate whether someone meant something or not. The comment didn't violate anything, it was just you that felt bead because you lost an argument so you take vengeance with your lads.
You're literally insulting them right now... "You're a snowflake" "you lost and felt bad so you took vengeance" Man, you really gotta learn the rules of the boards before posting dude. If you can't tell what tone or phrases are implicitly and explicitly insulting, you should probably avoid discussions such as these.
l MrD l (NA)
: Im already finding TFT more fun than SR
weirdwow (NA)
: TFT is complete RNG
I don't think you're going to like autochess games if you don't like RNG.
SmoGGedout1 (EUNE)
: ***
Uncalled for and hateful.
: The Ultimate Negativity Solution (Simple Button)
Just don't press enter. You're asking for a simple solution to press one button, when the simplest solution is to not press any.
: So why is Rito allowed to rip off ideas from other games and get away with it?
Why do all the fps games get free passe? Because no one cares. Every company will always make games similar to others in order to compete. After a while, whichever one is best will succeed and the rest will die off to a degree. That's how the market works in order to prevent one company from patenting a ton of genres and monopolizing the whole business. When someone criticizes a game purely for being similar to another (barring legitimate plagiarism) they are being stupid. You can say "I prefer TF2 over Overwatch because I enjoy the variety of weapons each character can equip." But saying "I like TF2 because it came first and Overwatch is a rip off" is a non argument.
BIader (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=DARCKD00M,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=RVZeLOxb,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-06-19T13:22:34.528+0000) > > yeah sadly too many people use clan tags to show words that would get you perma banned if used in chat > > and riot does nothing even if reported...they oculd even make sure those names can't be created! but nahhh let people show KYS* and lOlI and NGGA IT'S OK RIGHT RIOT! is loli a rly a hated word ...
> [{quoted}](name=BIader,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=RVZeLOxb,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-06-19T13:27:07.418+0000) > > is loli a rly a hated word ... Yes. It is directly related to something morally repulsive.
: So you agree, that anyone who says bad words in real life for any reason should be punished with jail time.
I have no idea how you made a jump that huge. {{sticker:sg-lux-2}}
: free love answer, its not some people its most people in this toxic game. the person who says quit feeding and/or person calling people the n word are normally escalated on the same system, maybe a little different. They all lead to the same thing and are considered the same thing then in the end. If people are running it down or afking that's easy to tell all the other stuff you claim people do they already do and chat on top of that. The resources not put toward the chat can then be put toward what you call the "other" stuff. Basically its your way or no way is what you say and nothing else matters. Just like this is considered a rant, i guess, hence silence and shut up is the method of your answer. Plus moving this from player behavior. This is a waste of time to write on here just same answers from "top" people with the same bottom line, your way or no way and ill be slightly nasty about saying it too. All good free love bro isn't that what this is all about anyway. :)
Why shouldn't the company who allows you to play their game have it their way out no way? If you don't like the rules, play a different game.
: Nobody expects you to tolerate anything. If you do not like a given person, press a single button (mute).
I do. I press report.
Zeanix (OCE)
: Auto Chess is now coming to league
I for one love the look of this! {{sticker:sg-lux}}
: Did you just recycle Darius' E fo Mordekaiser
Darius' pull brings all targets to him. Morde's seems to be a specific distance, as in the video it only pulled the target at max range halfway to him.
: > [{quoted}](name=Hotarµ,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=I0zsuVzT,comment-id=000300000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-23T16:13:06.790+0000) > > Oh, gotcha. > > So when you list Pyke's abilities multiple times, it's okay, but when I do it for Annie it's incorrect. > A pull > > All the same ability, he gets to choose between one or the other, he doesn't get a hook and the stab. > A stun on a basic ability > > Same ability again. > > Same ability _again_, also lol at calling it an ms "steroid" > Hp turns into MOAR DAMAGE > > Same ability for the fourth time. > A resetting ultimate > A blink on kill > Doubles kill gold > > Same ability again. > > _______ > > Yeah, totally not hypocritical whatsoever. This is where this conversation ends because it's become clear to me that you're not willing to accept Pyke's weaknesses. You're just choosing to ignore them for the purposes of complaining about him. Yes. I listed out individual parts of his kit. Here I’ll do Annie seeing as you are too ignorant to do a remotely fair assessment. Annie has A stun on passive Point and click damage Aoe damage Thornmail and damage reduction Summons a minion Sunfire on minion Enrage on minion. Oh look. If you use common sense and list out individual shit instead of fluffing it up, she has a whopping 7 mechanics. Now attempt that with Pyke. I gaurenfuckingtee it’s 2-3x longer a list.
Can you believe that there is a champion this overloaded? Resourceless Gets a huge shield for a percentage of the damage he deals Three consecutive autoattack buffs Dual scaling out the ass Mixed damage types Bonus experience in a duo lane A built in Sunfire ability for him and an ally A ms steroid for him and an ally An aoe burst around him and an ally Spellvamp that heals him Spellvamp that heals an ally Aoe cone in front of him that deals massive damage Aoe cone also gives him extra shields A massive damage long duration DOT Ability to clone an enemy when killed Ability to clone Dragon when killed And to top it all off all of his abilities deal magic damage meaning he can get Grievous wounds on his DOTs from Morello Slows on his DOTs with rylais And extra DOTs from liandrys What an overloaded champion! He must be in every game and win every time! Oh. It's morde and he's being reworked because no one plays him and he's bad. :/ (No offense Malicious Metal)
: im not mad i lost it for a whole 3 hours lol. might seem so from the sarcasm in a lot of the post might make an edit to clarify. ive only seen "spotsman like" conduct in chat a few dozen times. could flip that in reverse, imagine not getting rid of it because 10 people like it. the same 10 people who wanted the old aatrox to stay. the feature is supposed to be used as you inted but in almost a decade of playing its such a small fraction of a percent that actually used it that way. 3-4 more pings on a different key could almost handle the interactions needed for a game.
So if you specifically think the chat is useless and that it should be removed, why don't you mute all at the start of every game?
: Ive filed hundreds of them and not a single one has been "thanks for the report summoner" close to the decade Ive been playing. might just be a forums thing shedding more light on a minuscule minority. i think my stuff is fine not disputing its wrong or zomg shouldnt have done it rito.
I have had plenty of them give me instant feedback responses. They don't send an instant feedback response for every punishment. I can understand why too. For many people seeing that message that someone has been banned gives them a rush of endorphins and after so many of those messages they may start falsely reporting people just to get that message, rather than to actually punish those who break the rules.
: why not? since when is "defending yourself" wrong in any context. videogame or not. why is it wrong when someones ruining your day that you cant get the little satisfaction ruining theirs back? lose/lose with 1% win is better than lose solely on your part. if flame wars ditract from the game why not remove chat? no one likes talking to eachother and since voice chat is here just remove it and take the bad stuff with it. no minor strategy talk is worth it. if they dont then guess you have to go back to point #1 on the list. neither will flaming. BUT if they ruin your experience guess i should int back huh. thatll teach em! lol
"why not remove chat?" That's what the chat restriction was for. You seem to be angry about losing your chat privileges for breaking the rules, but you're also advocating to remove chat for everyone? If you think it's unfair that you got it taken away when you "defended yourself", imagine how unfair it would be for them to take it away from me or any of my friends who only use it for constructive planning and friendly chatting with teammates.
Radkliff (NA)
: Irrelevant, stop using non-competitive places as examples people. Anywhere there is competition there is flame, live with it. If you can't man up about it then go play something that isn't competitive.
Anywhere there is competition there is throwers, live with it. If you can't man up about it then go play something that isn't competitive.
promaxter5 (EUNE)
: Riot please stop destroying one of the only good games left!
If you have no reason to play because the missions, which weren't originally part of the game, cost money, then that means you don't enjoy the game. I play the game because I find it fun. I found it fun when I was getting one cycled by an LB with DFG in season three, I find it fun now that I'm getting one shot by a Zed with Duskblade. The missions are a bonus just like how skins are a bonus.
: SJW conspiracies and Riot Games
As an SJW myself, I prefer to speak only in facts and truth, and what you are saying is the most reasonable and truthful thing I've seen on these boards in a while (aside from everyone coming together against Ezreal and Lux getting even more new skins they don't need) I don't understand the downvotes.
: > [{quoted}](name=Periscope,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=7aim36Ya,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-02T16:49:24.672+0000) > > No, it’s a degrading term for people with mental disabilities, learning disabilities, and other developmental disabilities. Or it's a term widely known as not being associated with people with mental disabilities when used casually, just a term that has a lot of weight and basically means the same as "idiot"
Yeah, and the N word isn't racist if it's not towards a black person. /S
vtboy00 (NA)
: When are we going to ban non-english speakers on US servers?
"US Servers" I hope Riot makes a Canadian server soon so I can stop pretending to be American. /s
Nice Try (NA)
: refusing to group was the issue, friend
Did brand say they were refusing to group, or were they just not paying as much attention as they could have due to being tilted or not very good?
Nice Try (NA)
: ARE YOU SERIOUS RIOT? CALLING PEOPLE OUT FOR BAD PLAYING = REPORTED?
"i don't think I should be reported for calling someone bad" "I think brand should be reported for not playing well" 🤔
iChimp (NA)
: I've coined a term for these Riot following hacks. They're called sheeple using buzzwords and Riots vague TOS to claim moral high ground in any argument.
> "I've coined a term for these people." > Uses term that has been around for years.
: Small quote that shows exactly whats wrong in Riots current update mentality compared to back then.
BradNo (NA)
: I didn't make anyone lose. The could have been won if we played it out right.
How do you know that, if they had stayed, you would have won. Odds are they would have been extremely tilted, from you flaming them, and would have played worse, made more mistakes, and lost. Not to mention you don't know how many of your other team mates you may have tilted.
BradNo (NA)
: Was it not "Hate Speech?"
It was. Some people like to think that making fun of disabilities is not hate speech, but that's because they have never had to live with one.
Netorare (EUNE)
: People should stop being a fucking braindead wuss on the internet and get offended by everything.
No one needs morality from someone with a name like yours, considering you are more than likely breaking laws daily.
: I feel like you are not listening to what I'm saying, and you are way too focused on the "you're toxic" part. I'm assuming that Is because one day you ran across a toxic player ingame and now you're somehow scarred for life? Never understood how there can be so many special snowflakes in one place (these forums). This isn't really the point of the post, but if you really want me to give you an argument, here it goes. > You got your first permaban because Riot told you to stop bothering other people No, they didn't. In fact I had no idea you could even get permanently banned. I legitimately, wholeheartedly, was under the impression that this game endorsed free speech, like most other games do. My consistent toxic behavior can be attributed to many things (which is fucking irrelevant, by the way) - but the objective of my original post is to provide some insight, pointing toward the player behavior system in particular, which was literally designed to reform players, failed to do that for me. And that's ultimately what this is about. You are talking about something completely irrelevant, by the way. You're steering off the topic so hard. > Actually, it's like throwing a bowling ball at other people and complaining about the blood spatters on your coat lapel. Are you seriously trying to tell me that calling someone "dumb" is equivalent to a mass homicide? > The McDonald's coffee lawsuit was legitimate. The coffee was heated to very hazardous levels that would've given that woman third-degree burns on her mouth and esophagus if she'd drank it instead of spilling it on her lap. It's just like slipping on a wet floor. That's not necessarily the point, and you would think if the coffee was THAT hot, they wouldn't have been serving it in the first place. Surely other people drank the coffee as well, and I didn't see _several_ lawsuits pop up. Just that one. So I am under the impression that it was, in fact, not as hot as the media made it out to be and I believe the lawsuit is unjustified. Either way, making really hot coffee is hardly a crime, the same way calling someone a bitch is hardly a crime. If you decide to cut yourself because some _complete fucking stranger_ called you a bitch, that's your fault. If you spill hot coffee on your lap, that's your fault. Sticks and stones can break your bones but words will never hurt you. Right? Didn't your mother tell you that one? How did everyone become such sensitive little pussies? > Why would they try a system that didn't work a second time? It proved ineffective. The only people it helped were the sociopaths who were given free reign to ruin other people's matches to their hearts' content, and Riot is more concerned with the courteous majority. Because it's literally insane to think that someone would start _inting_ JUST because they can't type. That is fucking preposterous. Also, the proposal I gave at the end of my OP is not exactly a "permanent mute". It serves a much greater function and I suggest you reread it because it is not at all identical as to what Riot had put in place in the past. I believe my idea is much more superior in comparison to their pathetic attempt. > If someone just "can't refrain" from robbing banks, that means they will be pursued, tried, and possibly convicted and imprisoned, You are demonizing me. Do not compare me to a fucking criminal. I am nothing of the sort. > Maybe you should consider seeking that kind of help, if the consequences of the actions you can't restrain yourself from cause you so much distress. Now you're patronizing me. You realize this is completely unprovoked, right? Hard to take you seriously when you continuously insult me in your 'argument'.. if I can even call it that, since you really haven't given me a valid reason as to why my proposal is wrong, you're just trying to defame me as if you had some sort of psychological vendetta.
"Now you're patronizing me. You realize this is completely unprovoked, right?" Are you actually complaining about someone patronizing you after you call people "snowflakes" for not wanting to be called the n word? There is so much double think in your comments.
: It's 2019, being gay is socially acceptable now. There really isn't much if any homophobia going on anymore. That was so 15 years ago
Bruh, I live in Canada, which is supposedly more accepting than America, and only two of our provinces have banned conversion therapy. There's still a hell of a lot of homophobia. Edit: found this in this thread "Being gay is counter culture, You can't be mad at someone for what is a norm in most of the world.. It's Oce. If you don't contribute to evolution, of humanity via reproduction than it's understandable to be seen as less than = or an inferior being. When Family can be so important to their heritage." Calling gay people inferior beings isn't homophobic????
: The purple still can work, its just an example i made above. But it does not work together with turquoise. And btw the purple gets brown when she reaches lvl 11 +. https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VRvV4_G1vGU/XHRkoUDf57I/AAAAAAABPgk/MqZGr8B7XakWhcOvfy6x9LYj2E205kYBgCLcBGAs/s640/kayle11.png https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZPT6yv3LZsU/XG4V_CAgmqI/AAAAAAABPKA/DwvhYHRvF_AsV9KKKXMRSkzzz8vKaf3MQCLcBGAs/s640/kayle16.png
She loses her purple because she is ascending and accepting get full powers cutting off all ties to Morgana, who refuses to accept her powers.
: > [{quoted}](name=Dr Birdie,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=J50MAbxr,comment-id=0005000000000000,timestamp=2019-02-22T23:21:08.317+0000) > > If you don't think using a derogatory term to refer to someone with a physical disability isn't hate speech I don't know how to help you Like "gay," "midget" is not inherently derogatory, but that doesn't matter to the outrage culture fanatics determined to find offense. To wit: _When Dr. Samuel Johnson had finished his great lexicography, the first real English dictionary, he was visited by various delegations of people to congratulate him, including a delegation of London's respectable womanhood, who came to his parlor in Fleet Street and said, "Doctor, we want to congratulate you on your decision to exclude all indecent words from your dictionary." And he said, "Ladies, I congratulate you on your persistence in looking them up."_ _If people are determined to be offended, if they will climb up on the ladder, balancing it precariously on their own toilet cistern, to be upset by what they see through their neighbors' bathroom window, there's nothing you can do about that._ Those who are determined to be "offended" will discover a provocation somewhere. We cannot possibly adjust enough to please the fanatics, and it is degrading to make the attempt.
Man, none of y'all have ever been called a degrading term over a disability you have no control over, huh? I guess when you live your whole life not knowing how it feels, you can just go ahead and claim nothing is a slur. I'm not going to separately reply to all six of you, literally song the same thing though, so consider this my reply to all of you. On the topic of one of you bringing up "outrage culture" I fail to see what exactly is outrageous about asking someone not to use a slur that has historically only been used to insult and degrade. I do however see a lot of outrage surrounding one team getting a WARNING (not a punishment) over an obvious attempt to BM another team. But I'm done reiterating the plethora of reasons as to why their bans don't make any sense in a competitive viewpoint. If y'all wanna keep thinking that there was a real reason they banned shit that hasn't been seen in pro play in a year, that's on you.
: I totally agree, but what will this solve? Riot seems to be able to do anything they want and still have tons of people support them. The boards are a small community compared to the amount of players riot has that play this game.
> [{quoted}](name=Starmfangy,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Rk57AH83,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-02-22T18:13:27.392+0000) > > I totally agree, but what will this solve? Riot seems to be able to do anything they want and still have tons of people support them. The boards are a small community compared to the amount of players riot has that play this game. And what does it say that only a minority of people disagree with the decision?
: > [{quoted}](name=Dr Birdie,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=J50MAbxr,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2019-02-22T15:10:11.847+0000) > > First off, probably shouldn't use hate speech on the boards. > > Secondly, yes they probably would get a warning. Just like they would if they banned all dark skinned champs against a team comprised of black players. It is obviously disrespectful and being disrespectful to your coworkers will get you a warning from HR in any work place. On the second point only: No. It’s not the same. If I make a team of all top lane mains, and they get top laners banned against them, that would be the same scenario. In this instance, the banned champs were Janna, Lulu, Nami, Thresh, and Braum. So, beyond being all supports, against a team that is mostly support mains, what’s the actual issue here?
Because half of the champions they banned are not competitively viable and they only banned them in an attempt to be disrespectful by using the "women can only play support" meme.
Sobx (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Dr Birdie,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=J50MAbxr,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2019-02-22T15:10:11.847+0000) > > First off, probably shouldn't use hate speech on the boards. > > Secondly, yes they probably would get a warning. Just like they would if they banned all dark skinned champs against a team comprised of black players. It is obviously disrespectful and being disrespectful to your coworkers will get you a warning from HR in any work place. Commenting on events and making actually a valid comparison isn't a "hate speech" just because it isn't patting everyone on their backs. When "X person" is playing badly, it's ok to say they're playing badly. Suddenly when "Y person" is playing badly, you're not allowed to say anything because you'll hide behind a hate speech? So if you target ban 5 top lane champs it's fine, but target ban 5 support champions (that are also played in other positions btw) and it's "disrespectful", "discriminating" or "hate speech"? That makes absolutely no sense and you don't understand what "equality" means, so maybe you should stop using it as an argument (or more of a way to shut down anything someone says when you disagree with it). >Just like they would if they banned all dark skinned champs against a team comprised of black players. 1. Make a team "comprised of black players" 2. Make sure they only grind dark skinned champions as their mains 3. Nobody can target ban them in pro play, because that's insensitive. That's literally what you just said, buddy. Congrats.
Never said what they did was hate speech said what the person said that I'm replying to is. You know the part where they literally said a slur.... And as for the bans, the action itself is not inherently disrespectful, it was the intent that was.
: Hate speech. HAH. Funny joke.
If you don't think using a derogatory term to refer to someone with a physical disability isn't hate speech I don't know how to help you
: what if those dark skinned champs are op at the moment
The chamois Rox banned weren't op....
Kürama (NA)
: Hey Birdie sup girl? If I banned all birdie champs in-game would that be considered hate speech too? Where does it end?
I don't see how that is in any way relevant considering I am not actually a bird, but sure w/e
EeliAzzer (EUNE)
: BM != hate speech
Nope, the person I'm replying to used hate speech, not the team.
: > [{quoted}](name=Dr Birdie,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=E0VW7QEJ,comment-id=00240001,timestamp=2019-02-22T18:17:19.167+0000) > > They don't play only female champs. They did do it just to be edgy and offensive. And from everything I've read, Rox never got banned, they got a warning. So I don't understand why everyone is getting so salty about a Russian team, they most likely don't follow, being verbally reprimanded for breaking the rules they agreed to follow. Because we don't want this or need this happening in any other Reigon
We don't want teams to be warned that they need to stop breaking rules regarding respecting enemy teams?
Papdi1 (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Starmfangy,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=E0VW7QEJ,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-02-22T02:10:54.787+0000) > > Why do people still play this game if things like this are happening? Is there something i missed? Well nazi invented jet engines and found out that smoking cause cancer. Should we all start smoking and abort jet engines then? In my case I just stopped buying RP. To be honest this game is no longer fun,I just play some aram at work during breaks. Rankeds are worthless
I'm actually dying!!! You just compared Riot to Nazis and you actually expect people to listen to your opinions?
Papdi1 (EUW)
: ***
You're real bad at this whole "being a rational person thing"
Arakadia (NA)
: Except only one of them will be playing support. It doesn't matter if they are all support mains because only one of them will be playing support. It was bm, it wasn't tactical.
I've noticed in this thread that none of these people have tried to argue the point that only one of them was playing support. It really days a lot that one obvious statement can destroy their arguments of "but they're all support mains"
Myrmiron (EUW)
: I can understand Vega Squadron but punishing ROX is beyond rtarded. I can't contribute anything that hasn't already been said in the Reddit post so I'll just paraphrase 2 Reddit posts that summarize my feelings on this matter. 1) Banning them for "gender discrimination" doesn't look so good when you're an organization that puts female low Dia players vs male Challenger players and then streams the humiliation of those female players live. What a fucking joke Riot RU, if anyone should be banned it's you for allowing this in the first place. 2) Riot RU compromized their ladder by letting in a low Dia team in in the first place, they make Riot and the LCS RU look like a fucking joke of a company and not the serious esports organization they want to be. So again, if anyone should be ashamed for this it's Riot, not the CHALLENGER players who have to play against LOW DIA players. Idk if anyone at Riot RU actually play League of Legends, but the difference between CHALLENGER and LOW FUCKING DIA is absolutely massive.
We're dealing with a team disrespecting a marginalised group and the first sentence you start with contains a slur? Where is the self awareness?
Papdi1 (EUW)
: ***
Question:. Why the sudden xenophobia towards Nordic countries? Easiest way to have people disregard your opinions towards situations like these is to be racist.
Papdi1 (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Bird Girl ºvº,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=E0VW7QEJ,comment-id=000c,timestamp=2019-02-22T10:10:05.301+0000) > > The fuck? The girls were ALL Support mains, and every ban was a ban from pretty much EACH girl's champion pool. > > It's fucked. Rito thought it would not go viral but they were wrong. Pretty sure they will let it pass like with PAX 2018 and they will act like nothing happened.
"act" Nothing did happen. A team acted disrespectful towards a competing team and were thus warned to discontinue their behaviour.
Dominator (EUNE)
: THIS BEHAVIOR BY RIOT IS OUTRAGEOUS!!! UNBELIEVABLE!!! "intentionally stretching out" the match AND "ROX banned 5 support champions during the pick/ban process" IS BANNABLE NOW?? I HOPE THIS IS A REALLY EARLY APRIL FOOLS JOKE.
Neither are bannable. That's why neither team was banned. They were both given warnings to discontinue their disrespectful behavior. Please stop spreading false information.
Arakadia (NA)
: This isn't comparable and you should know that. Anyone random banning your main isn't specifically done to bm you, and your not in a professional environment.
These people don't understand that. They'd rather just say "there's no such thing as sexism" and then continue to use sexist slurs in all of their games.
: So if the meta is {{champion:39}} {{champion:76}} {{champion:103}} {{champion:67}} {{champion:99}} and my team wants to ban out the meta picks we all gonna get suspended or banned for banning them cause they’re female?
: ***
Very convincing argument You should be on a debate team
Show more

Dr Birdie

Level 177 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion