Rioter Comments
: If I'm jungling and I've consistently had both the enemy jungler + a laner invading me all game and contesting/stealing all of my camps, where my laner is neither roaming nor shoving to punish despite requesting, I'm not gonna sit and be useless because of it for x amount of minutes, there is a small amount of time you can come back from that where you camp the living hell out of a lane that's doing well, and turn that into a 2v1 or 3v2. But now if that jungler pays attention he'll just countergank, or continue to steal everything. This is a team based game, and if you have a team that won't listen due to any factor (thinks they have better plan, refusal to communicate, salt) and are put at such a massive disadvantage by enemy pressure, I'll take the L now and hope for better later. I'm the type that won't surrender unless literally everyone is losing and/or miserable (unless your team is losing against a scaling comp as bullies), but you can't just say there never is a time to, ever since itemization tends to negate a lot of "Early Bullies" falloff factors
> [{quoted}](name=BackdoorPrincess,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=dsqkBcv8,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-08-18T00:30:23.905+0000) > > If I'm jungling and I've consistently had both the enemy jungler + a laner invading me all game and contesting/stealing all of my camps, where my laner is neither roaming nor shoving to punish despite requesting, I'm not gonna sit and be useless because of it for x amount of minutes, there is a small amount of time you can come back from that where you camp the living hell out of a lane that's doing well, and turn that into a 2v1 or 3v2. > > But now if that jungler pays attention he'll just countergank, or continue to steal everything. This is a team based game, and if you have a team that won't listen due to any factor (thinks they have better plan, refusal to communicate, salt) and are put at such a massive disadvantage by enemy pressure, I'll take the L now and hope for better later. > > I'm the type that won't surrender unless literally everyone is losing and/or miserable (unless your team is losing against a scaling comp as bullies), but you can't just say there never is a time to, ever since itemization tends to negate a lot of "Early Bullies" falloff factors But you have to sit and be useless for however long the game is. Might as well learn how to come back from that.
Rioter Comments
: Why is it no one has fixed the afk problem in this game?
Oh look a downvote troll who always downvotes without arguments because mah riot.
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Academy Kayn,realm=NA,application-id=RaE1aOE7,discussion-id=p7QvZW11,comment-id=0018,timestamp=2019-06-25T05:44:54.537+0000) > Additionally, I'd like to point something out for all the folk crying 'Surprise Mechanics'. I'd like to keep people reminded that one of the biggest points of controversy in the Lootbox debacle, is that these things are coming out in games in which are also costing you a premium for the game itself, that big 60$ price tag. I am absolutely adamant in contesting this point and calling it moot. Riot has been stocking on an outright awful track-record throughout multiple cosmetic systems that have begun to sprawl outwards. First and foremost, the most relevant '60$ premium price tag' game company is EA, so let's compare some numbers. Revenue as of 2018: Riot [Single stand-alone MOBA FtP]: 1.4 B E.A. Releasing more than ten games : 5.1 B Consider also that Riot has less than a third of E.A.'s employees, and is still making comparable numbers with a single FtP. Riot is not doing poor financially by any means, this being 'their only opportunity for monetization' is a piss-poor excuse, and it surfaces every time, lest we forget that they're a subsidiary of Tencent, the largest earner in the game industry globally. As for the 'track-record' I was mentioning: Chromas took nearly no man-power, none, no re-modelling, it was five dollars. **Five dollars** for something that was proved an artist could do in less than ten minutes. How did they solve this? They tacked on slightly more variation requiring anything more than bare minimum effort, after stating their previous system needed revision. That did not stop them from upping the price to ten dollars per chroma. This was coupled with a preachy 'We here at Riot games are dedicated to giving you the best.' when chromas were glossed over on introduction. [Added note to this point, remember when they blatantly made a Leona skin with what was pretty much two chromas of the same concept and stated that both would be sold for thirty dollars individually? What about the Blitzcrank one? Paying more money for an exclusive skin variation is now the trend, prestige skins are making this system worse, things are only getting more 'consumer-unfriendly.' Riot is seemingly _always_ looking for any opportunity to take advantage of its audience.] Battle-passes. You now have next to no participation in nearly **any** event without the flavor of the month pass, locked behind a pay-wall. Lastly, this may seem a bit more tangential, aimless, and anecdotal, though humor me if you don't mind. Riot offers a platform that is by default configured with a chat-filter enabled, you won't see anything remotely vulgar. You have to deliberately disable this to see anything. Riot has managed their system so that you are **guaranteed** to be banned on certain words or phrases, but they allow you to say them, there are no holds barred, they have already put all pieces in play to control your language while you are on their platform, but they don't, they allow you to ban yourself off of a pool of words regardless of context, despite all these prohibitions in the first place, and they couple with it condescending contradictory rubbish, 'everyone deserves respect on the rift,' outright stating that there are words deemed inherently disrespectful that they don't think should be said under any circumstances, but they allow you to. Why? League's banned players come back routinely, and if they bought skins the first time it's likely they'll do it again, one High Noon Yasuo skin purchase gradually turns into two, three. My friend has been perma'd across four accounts, he buys some skins he lost from the previous ban every time. In closing, this tangent is not intended to be a critique or discourse on what is or what is not acceptable for League speech, or a declaration of 'muh free speech,' only an attempt at introspect on what seems to me like a system that Riot can't be bothered to pull together cohesively, or won't. If they truthfully think that there is no place for racist, sexist, homophobic or similar remarks in League they wouldn't allow them, they already display every ability to suppress them. It wouldn't take anything more than negating messages that contain a buzz-word from being sent in chat, just disable the god damn string of characters if you don't think it should be said, and what they're doing is just as controlling as completely negating certain words from being sent, with the added potential of having someone loop back into the grind with another account when it's all said and done. You'd think it'd be a waste on labor hours for the support team explaining each ban when issuing each ticket.
I never really thought about the chat system having the filter on by default before. You are right about that. I cannot really think of any reason to ban someone in a game with a chat filter AND a mute system for words.
: Well, since everyone else is jumping on the 'Surprise Mechanics' train, I'm gonna voice my opinion, and try to give some actual feedback. I'll address my biases at the moment, which is obviously against these types of practices. However, I do not see this black or white, and have the same opinion here as I do with Prestige Skins right now. I will state my opinions, my exceptions, and finally, my feedback. **Opinions:** Really? I am really disappointed to see that this is where this road went down. The moment I saw that Sugarcorn Furryhorn, I was downright in love with the little guy, even at level 1, with his dopey stance and stupid face. God that guy is adorable. I knew that as cosmetics, that there was going to be a price to pay for them, but such a variable price doesn't really encourage me to shill out money on the chance of getting any of the other ones, who I honestly kinda hate. I am aware, however, that the base variants of the lil' critters are purchasable by their lonesome. That on itself makes it somewhat better, but as we continue to proceed down the line of randomly gotten cosmetics, obviously some people are going to fall in love with some specific variation, like I am with the cutest little Furyhorn. Now that I'm on my own and outta the parents, I can't say I'm of sound mind trying to get this guy, and waste money on other variations that I will never want, and never use. It's a downright waste of my money. **Exceptions:** However, outside of my personal feelings about this situation, I think people down below are somewhat mistaken, similar to that of Prestige Skins. While admittedly, their implementation may have had some eye raising choices, I believe the same issue falls here as it was with Prestige. People's expectations are driving their rational. Just like how Prestige Skins aren't meant to be gotten by everyone, nor is the idea you're supposed to try to collect them all, it's similar here. People want these, but are disappointed with how they are gotten, which is fair, but the argument could be made is 'You're not supposed to dump money into this, unless you really want one', like Prestige before they were made Grindy as hell per event. However however, however, it is the complete opposite here. With how this system is set up, it seems like we're not even encouraged to get a single one, but to somehow collect them all. As I said above, I hate all of those which are not the Sugarcorn Furyhorn. He is the goodest boy and deserves to be loved. You've made the these exactly the same as pre-change Prestige Skins, where you needed to dump a **huge** amount of money into getting the **one** you want. As with Prestige, I extremely hope that this changes the same way Prestige has gone. Additionally, I'd like to point something out for all the folk crying 'Surprise Mechanics'. I'd like to keep people reminded that one of the biggest points of controversy in the Lootbox debacle, is that these things are coming out in games in which are also costing you a premium for the game itself, that big 60$ price tag. While I'm still not a fan of these types of practices, League's only income is from people too impatient to earn a champion, or it's cosmetic side. There's always a challenge to find when it comes to finding a way to make money that is acceptable by the consumer, what they find acceptable. Obviously, companies will see what consumers are fine paying for, so they push the line to see what they can get away with it. That's just the nature of the relationship between consumer and producer. **Feedback:** For my feedback, I'm going to try to side away from the fact that I love the Sugarcorn Furyhorn and I want him for the cheapest available amount. My feedback will be aiming for a decent compromise between Player and Company. 1) **Keep the Series Eggs, Remove the Level Up Feature, remove tier Ranks**: You keep the lootbox format, but you remove the level up feature that levels your pets up via getting duplicates. You remove the Rarity system in pets, and make them a simple divided chance amongst them all, which obviously lowers the more Eggs you buy. Legendary Ranks are fine in normal skins, but unless there is some additional effects or VO or something, I honestly do not know why these are being seperated into Tiers outside of "Enh, we felt like literally copying Lootboxes." 2) **Keep the Series Eggs, Keep the Level Up Feature, Keep Tier Ranks, Add a way to get Eggs outside of buying them**: If you're going to create a system that requires so much spending of money, then you need to be able to get them in alternative ways. Off the top of my head, these alternative ways could be an individual Level for TFT, shorter Ranked seasons that could gift Eggs for progress up the ladder (Think Duelyst/Hearthstone kinda thing), or possibly earned through normal level up chests. This one has more ideas than I can think of. While this mimics Overwatch, which isn't that good a thing, I consider it a better alternative. 3) **Just make them like skins.**: I think while this is biased in favor of the consumer, I think this is simply the most favorable you will get from consumers point of view. Overprice them if you have to, removing the loops and rings is what people desire. Level them up via playing Matches with them maybe. I'm sure that there are more potenials that I haven't listed here, but as it stands now, I think that the system you have set up now is entirely, onesidely in favor of the consumer. I think the lashing out by the community is understandable, because this is beyond a level of acceptable. Late mention, whatever choice you go with, please make it so you can choose which level of animal you get to use for your little boy. I love the sitting on butt Furyhorn boi.
Yes riot sells skins and champions to make money. Good. That is fine. The pricing may be debatable but the skins and champions can be bought individually. This is a loot box system you have to pay a large sum of money for. You could get what you want in three loot boxes or it could take you an insane number of them. I do not want but a few little legends and the rest i dont want at all. So i wont be spending ANY money on this where as BEFORE i was willing to spend money on the ones i want. I was honestly surprised this was a intentionally rip you off system and not the same skin/champion system from before.
: Little Legends Series Egg Guide
What a scummy thing to do, adding a loot box system. Loot boxes are always bad. I refuse to pay you ANY money for a maybe. EVER. You want my money you will give me a rosebloom silverwing egg specifically. I will not buy a species egg. I will not buy a series egg. I will buy the thing i want or nothing. Can't wait till these systems are illegal and you are forced to implement fair systems.
: That wouldn't fully solve the problem of accidental combing from the carousel. You know what would? Not automatically combining champions. I'd like to see items removable too... but also champion combining made manual.
both would be nice only combines if tray is full
Rioter Comments
: I don't know anything about tft, but Gnar transforming in the actual game is a passive, which silence doesn't stop, so that is probably why that happens.
Yeah but it happens with a LOT of special abilities in tft to the point the silence knife is pointless.
Rioter Comments
: thats how it works atm
then why do i spend 100 coins and never see the heroes the person who just died had consistantly?
Rioter Comments
: Riot’s Current Plan to Reduce Item RNG
Heres hoping they dont wat a month to implement.
Rioter Comments
arowin242 (EUW)
: Urgot is classified as a juggernaut of sorts... the only ranged one. like all juggernaut kiting is his many weakness, he also has NO in-build sustain and is forced to abuse conqueror for any healing at all. get a tank to CC him, then watch your ADC melt him like a Popsicle on a searing hot summer day. alternatively gank him from 2 sides, as he can only use his W + passive on 1 person. ranged champions also dumpster him in lane. lastly in the early stages he likes to build black cleaver and frozen mallet / death's dance. this leaves him open to %HP dmg so you can shred him that way. of course playing the ultimate juggernaut counter {{champion:67}} is almost bound to have success
juggernauts arent a thing they are just tanks with damage.
iiGazeii (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=rito are scambgs,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=YpRY2XQ7,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-07-02T22:00:51.635+0000) > > he literally has 0 seconds cooldown on machine gun at max rank...... At max rank. In the early game, it is not at max rank.
thats like 12 minutes in that he can hit 5 with w or less
: Try learning how his abilities actually work, because he does not have most of these.
he has everything i just said though i did forget to mention his low cooldown passive which gives him free aoe on a large cone in front of him which also hits things outside the indicator. his aoe slow his ease of both farming escaping surviving catching killing executing ccing taking turrets. Seriously what is his weakness?
Nekorus (NA)
: if a tank is infront of urgot he cant do nothing since he has to flash to get to the backline. your dmg dealers can deal with him easily if your tank just peel him off of yall.
or use his dash put the tank behind him and then kill your backline.
: Because his W is doing literally _nothing_ on it's own. It is just a tool to efficiently proc his passive, but the ability itself does not provide much since they moved the shield away from it.
it is infinite and does 36 percent of ad to champions and structures endlessly his tankiness means he can walk up to a turret with no minions and just kill it because for some unknown reason turret damage is capped.
: I don't like playing against Urgot in general but he's not mobile. The only insane thing that I can't wrap my head around is his W becomes a toggle ability that costs no mana and can even target structures... Like why is the cost of that ability decreasing over time?
He has flash and a large dash to be used as escape or to catch up hes mobile.
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=LoliSupergirl,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=zNPvmAEF,comment-id=000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-07-01T06:08:04.094+0000) > > https://gyazo.com/7b0511f948f5e71f324ee851329f6b1e > > If you wanna call others small brains but cant read something is wrong. > > No an end game score actually tells you a lot and you get a lot of data from op.gg not just an end game score. > > That aside being slow with no escapes doesn't matter when without any real lead you are damn near unstoppable. Morde can be taken down by cc too. But name anyone who survives a stun lock? No one does. Plus post 6 you cant even group up on him because of his broken ult. If you've actually played and done bad on Morde you'd know "when without any real lead you are damn near unstoppable" is complete bs. Just like any other champ if you are behind, you are behind. "Plus post 6 you cant even group up on him because of his broken ult." Also not true. For one, you know where they are in the death realm, meaning your entire team can position to catch him when he comes out. Also, yes, an ultimate you can litterally make lose all value by buying a cheap item is totally broken.
Mordes team also knows where he is or did you forget that? If youre grouped the enemy is too. Morde just ten second removed your most fed person from the game. Also no item makes mordes ult useless.
: > [{quoted}](name=LoliSupergirl,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=zNPvmAEF,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2019-06-28T07:20:20.667+0000) > > First off be civil or silent. Second The inability not to catch someone isnt a weakness. Not when the only thing not being able to catch them means is not dying. Does not change that fighting him 1v1 as you would in the lanes he goes to is not possible to do in an even fight. In other words morde has no weaknesses. Besides you after checking your history and seeing the disgusting amount of wins you have with morde and the scores you usually get as him compared to EVERYTHING else you play i stand by my argument. On morde you average 15 5 everything else roughly 7 12. Lol I'd love for you to point out where I was "uncivil". I would respond but I honestly can't understand what you just wrote. Also, using my lone match history isn't conclusive date, nor does an end game score describe every aspect of a match. Morde has weaknesses, learn how to play against him or ban him, your choice.
https://gyazo.com/7b0511f948f5e71f324ee851329f6b1e If you wanna call others small brains but cant read something is wrong. No an end game score actually tells you a lot and you get a lot of data from op.gg not just an end game score. That aside being slow with no escapes doesn't matter when without any real lead you are damn near unstoppable. Morde can be taken down by cc too. But name anyone who survives a stun lock? No one does. Plus post 6 you cant even group up on him because of his broken ult.
: > [{quoted}](name=LoliSupergirl,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=zNPvmAEF,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-06-28T04:28:26.738+0000) > > You can lose and feed on anyone thats not an argument. This morde has no weaknesses old morde lost to teemo and anything else that could block shield stacking. Now you cant fight against him. No, it is an argument. The argument being, if you can do bad and lose on a champion, they have weaknesses. He does have weaknesses, here's one for you small brains: High mobility. Again, learn how to play against him.
First off be civil or silent. Second The inability not to catch someone isnt a weakness. Not when the only thing not being able to catch them means is not dying. Does not change that fighting him 1v1 as you would in the lanes he goes to is not possible to do in an even fight. In other words morde has no weaknesses. Besides you after checking your history and seeing the disgusting amount of wins you have with morde and the scores you usually get as him compared to EVERYTHING else you play i stand by my argument. On morde you average 15 5 everything else roughly 7 12.
: Or, learn how to play against him. Morde doesn't auto win every match, you can lose and feed on morde, it's not hard. If you think this morde is bad, you've never seen old morde, he did the litteral same thing.
You can lose and feed on anyone thats not an argument. This morde has no weaknesses old morde lost to teemo and anything else that could block shield stacking. Now you cant fight against him.
Rioter Comments
Kai Guy (NA)
: If you play 1 v 9 your doing this game wrong.
No what the current system makes you do is carry 1 v 9. Because i assure you the 3 unranked and the bronze you get matched with vs a team of full silvers and a gold is you fighting 9 people to try and win.
Kai Guy (NA)
: > Being the best of a hundred bad choices is still a bad choice. Yea? What about being the best choice out of literally every possible option? Is it still a bad choice when there is no alternative? To me.. The term you use for something like that would be The best option. If nothing is better then its the best. Stats btw are shitty systems to use. You still have to account for wins losses and who is playing the match Or you have a crappy system that's open to abuse by anyone. Any time it looks like a loss due to skill gaps i don't play to win i just play to pad. KDA? Each D multiplicity reduces this. Rewards selfish players and champions who can evade death over ones who can win games by setting up teams with engage. Selfish behavior is bad in a team game, should be self evident. Damage? I spam any ability the moment i have a target to pad damage. Regardless of if its a good play. OOM back return Spam. Ez. {{champion:30}} who casts R every time its off cd always does more damage then the one who saves it. How much does that help you win games compared to a kathus who uses R to help other lanes win fights or secure a high value kill that opens pressure across the map who otherwise was going to escape and live? OBJ damage? Ignore enemy's when they are pushing and go hit some towers to pad obj. Your teammates lose the 4v5 but your probably your teams MVP for obj damage. the enemy's are gonna dilute their damage by focusing on the obj as a team and also not like every class has the same job for doing raw damage to Objs. If i split a tower i get the entire value for it in damage. Poke dragon and barron with abilitys then back. return and poke it when their health comes back. Ez to pad. 0 impact on a win. Probably going to make for a loss because your not doing anything of value with your time. Dragons and Barron are great and all but are they really worth more then a nexus going boom? CC? Spam it any time you have a target. What's a threat thou, hard CC when its On CD or if its off CD? If i throw the ability then run to safty all game i have a great CC score and my team is going to hate me for it because i am not using it right. Vision? Run around dumping wards. Healing? spam it with no regards for if its needed. Weak system if you have 0 context for whos playing. I am never gonna cut it in the NBA but i can list off all kinds of people who i can beat 1 sided because they simply are not remotely able to compete in the sport. When's the last time you saw a Blind man on a professional team? Try again. Go for it. Name something you think is better then Winning games to prove skill. Want to call it bad? Name 1 thing that provably works better.
I already multiple times gave a better alternative 2 in fact. Also if there's 100 options and they all suck then yes this being the least sucky of the 100 still makes it suck. There is no such thing as a lesser evil you just have evil. Your argument ignores an important point. No one plays ranked to just game the system and get better opponents and ally. With my idea you still have to win to get points. You wont go up if you don't win. Just having a better team doesn't matter if you didn't earn your spot you're still gonna fight the better team. But it will be pretty obvious to everyone involved if you're trolling to set up your mmr and not trying to win that is also reportable so what exactly is your point?
Kanzler (NA)
: The difference between silvers and golds isn't so much mechanical ability as it is game knowledge. You probably only see real mechanical difference starting in plat+
That is not relevant. There is a skill difference regardless of weather it is knowing what to do when or how to do it. Mechanics and game knowledge are both needed to go up and both matter. A silver 2 should never be able to beat a gold 4 because of that gap. If they do win then there is something wrong with the fact that that gold managed to climb that high.
: Or just get good and stop crying whenever you see a gold player in the enemy team? Bruh it's all the same. Gold and plat are just glorified silver. Nothing more.
First off you are a troll but lets pretend you aren't for a second. Getting good is the entire point but you alone don't matter that much. It should be obvious to everyone on the planet that you shouldn't need to be good enough to carry 1 v 9 to just go up one tier. You should simply have to be slightly better than those around you. The only people unable to recognise the skill difference of a silver 3 and a silver 2 are people who are multiple tiers ahead and view everyone below as always making big mistakes. There is a difference between silver 2 and 3 its not a big one but its why the two are separated.
: do different games use better systems than mmr? i thought it was all the same everywhere
I dunno i have played many mobas. Mmr is possibly the best existing system. That however is not impressive. Being the best of a hundred bad choices is still a bad choice. They could replace the mmr system with the system used to grade people. Would not affect your ranking or points just who you are matched with and against and would use the overall of it not just the kills or wins. Id rather have 4 0 7s that each took 3 turrets and a herald/2 dragons than a 15 0 who did nothing but get a few kills.
: The only alternative to MMR is randomly putting people in games. Do you truly think that would give you and everyone else a better experience?
You could always match people within 1 tier of their rank.
Rioter Comments
: "ggez"
At this point reporting should be removed like seriously THIS is a question? If this offends you go lock yourself in padded room you're nuts. You are doomed you cannot handle human society just accept the fate you have brought on yourself.
Akrid415 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=LordRedStone Nr1,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=rrMIseEl,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-06-21T05:14:47.126+0000) > > I do report "ggez" unless it's _clearly_ in a funny context. > It's just disrespectful, If your enemy was there in person would you walk up to them and say "haha this was easy you suck we totally destroyed you"? Do they actually punish people for saying "ggez?" I always report them but I've been curious if they actually do anything about it.
If they do this game is on a slow decline and deserves it. Toddler level poking fun is not punishable by any reasonable person. You should be punished for reporting that.
B312 (EUW)
: Why in the universe would this merit any sort of punishment?
Because riot is manned by far leftists who think even the most minute of irritants are a world ending concern? I once had a thread deleted because i criticized a system riot implemented without it being in the wrong topic or in any way insulting.
: > [{quoted}](name=zbot252,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=2kzo6li8,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-06-21T23:44:11.041+0000)Just want to know if this merits a permanent ban. Thanks. This does merit a punishment. Whether or not it merits a *permanent ban* depends on your previous account history. If you received a previous 14-day ban and did not sufficiently demonstrate good behavior prior to this punishment, this would indeed have triggered a permanent ban.
In the case of a permanant ban i would argue history of being a bit irritating isnt as relevant as the morality of removing someone from the game instead of just infinitely increasing per time chat bans or time bans. A permanent ban should require something extreme not the tiny things in this. I think when talking permas it absolutely should always have to have a moral justification for it.
zbot252 (NA)
: Should I be permanently banned?
For a permanent ban nothing short of discrimination should be a thing. Ever increasing ban till you prove you aren't game 2 anymore yes, i guess tho mute is a thing so kinda not really.
: > [{quoted}](name=R107 Games,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=e8KehWv2,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-06-23T20:32:18.584+0000) > > First "ggez" now people want "?" to be punishable? The sensitivity never ends Thats unsportmanlike and tilting by non toxic way. Learn the difference..
That's tilting to toddlers and people of the same maturity level. That is actually less insulting than toddlers insults. Toddlers say dummy poo poo head. Grow up seriously.
: Is there a good reason why someone spamming "?" isn't bannable?
Because even this game isnt that petty yet. If you cant handle that and muting is for some reason too hard for you maybe interacting with anything human is not something you should do.
Kai Guy (NA)
: Thanks Zeph. I will just explain it to the OP thou. It was my hope if I made it a challenge they might be more inclined to be proactive in learning on their own rather then force me to repeat the usually steps of making a long back and forth with the intent of walking folks over MMR step by step until they understand it or decide to ignore reality because it does not match what their expectations are. Which does get a bit frustrating for me at time.
If the mmr system worked then you would not have games be so lopsided so often. In my last 20 games ALL but 2 where stomps for one side or the other. You basically just said that you gain or lose it by winning or losing. Wininng and losing are just the end result of all the actions by both teams. That is not a representation of ANYTHING. You can have games with people who belong 5-7 tiers above where they are but don't have the skills to carry people so their mmr is not where it belongs. This is why generic systems like rank v rank work better.
Kai Guy (NA)
: What points do you gain when you win or lose a match of league? Hint. Check the FAQ before you comment.
Hint no ones talking about the points the conversation is about who you are matched with and against.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Razured (NA)
: Riot never fixes shit and they never allows lost prevented what so ever. I was playing earlier as a support and the client crashed 3 times on me in two different game and I was unable to reconnect and I know that they noticed the issue since they make a post about it on the client but they didn't even activate the fucking lost prevented option so I lost around 25 LP because I couln't connect to the game?
> [{quoted}](name=Razured,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=MRgeYrHe,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-06-10T20:19:54.016+0000) > > Riot never fixes shit and they never allows lost prevented what so ever. I was playing earlier as a support and the client crashed 3 times on me in two different game and I was unable to reconnect and I know that they noticed the issue since they make a post about it on the client but they didn't even activate the fucking lost prevented option so I lost around 25 LP because I couln't connect to the game? Yeah I'm not sure why when they announce people are dcing lets not disable ranked.
Ayzev (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=On My Kill List,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=uRjKIyUl,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2019-06-10T11:49:56.100+0000) > > you can dodge her shit, therefore she's always balanced By that logic, she could have her ult be a global 0 cost 5 second cooldown 100% max hp true damage nuke and she still wouldn't deserve a nerf. You can't just assume that everything dodgeable will be dodged. Every skillshot hits once in a while. And it isn't just the bad players getting hit - Lux has a 20% pick rate in Master+.
> [{quoted}](name=Ayzev,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=uRjKIyUl,comment-id=00060001,timestamp=2019-06-10T12:09:17.672+0000) > > By that logic, she could have her ult be a global 0 cost 5 second cooldown 100% max hp true damage nuke and she still wouldn't deserve a nerf. You can't just assume that everything dodgeable will be dodged. > Every skillshot hits once in a while. And it isn't just the bad players getting hit - Lux has a 20% pick rate in Master+. You basically said nerf because i cant seem to walk left or right.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Show more

Elissa Mei

Level 49 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion