: The biggest problem with League of Legends is you.
well written, but you speak as if trolls with an iq of -4 would bother to read and reason/coincide with this post {{sticker:sg-lulu}}
: Xj9 I promise I'll look into un-banning you if you stop downvoting everything
Low-key I didn't know he was banned. However, j do now wonder what happened to xj9, creampeye, Colton, and konotori/onotori lmao
Cheini (EUNE)
: Seize calling the voter "bot" pls
spoken just like a bot programmer
: Sett talks about being a half-breed, and talks about his fur, but....
> [{quoted}](name=Elite4Runner,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=bqf1uzlf,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2019-12-13T21:11:43.766+0000) > > Ahri is a kitsune, or a fox spirit. She is based on eastern traditional lore for being a spirit / demon that disguises itself as a beautiful woman in order to charm (hence her charm ability) men in order to devour them. If you listen to some of her voice lines, they're pretty menacing. > > As for Sett, his bestial strength and innate use of magic are his Vastayan traits, aside from his ears. > [{quoted}](name=LightswornLance,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=bqf1uzlf,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2019-12-13T21:06:55.155+0000) > > He's a half, half breed. Half, half animal. if this is true that means riot has admitted that vastayans are cannonically the result of furries in runeterra. thank you for coming to my ted talk.
Quáx (NA)
: That still may not fix the problem. If a post has 63 upvotes and 21 downvotes, that means the post at minimum needs 84 comments, that 84 different people to choose from.
correct, but that would also mean you would need a bot, to not only make a coherent post, but also make sure its not too closely related to other posts for fear of copy-paste junk that makes it easy to spot out.
: Can't post the game otherwise it will be considered a witch hunt, and im not trying to ban him, just want to know if people see this ban correct and know ways to deal with troll in game so i dont leave a game next time
not exactly, when i spoke with a mod about this (maybe prandine i think?) youre allowed to post links to your own match history, youre just not allowed to call out or specify who is the troll. us finding out who it is by physically checking your already public match history isnt naming and shaming, as youre allowed to share a match that you yourself played in.
: -60 upvotes in 10 minutes.... Looking suspicious
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/505479052396855309/655129767892222003/unknown.png
: I don't even understand how this can happen
Arammus (EUW)
: i highly doubt your story tbh. i've yet to see someone get banned for banning someones champ. and for leaving? laughable.
actually you very well *can* be, only you have to be an absolute nub and admit it in chat, that youre doing it solely because they pissed you off, a metric fuckton of times. same for afk, like you legitimately have to leave hundreds to actually get banned, being that they actually have to be *really* lenient for these kinds of things.
: He's right though. It's the NA special. 99% of these boards can't form a coherent argument against Riven or Yasuo. They see the name then go "sCREEEEEEEEEEEEEE GUT THEM IMMEDIATELY" EDIT: I'm not saying she should or should not be buffed. I'm saying that the boards have zero capacity for reason regarding Riven.
Euw boards are the exact same, just more dead.
wolvius (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Yordle Gunner,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=nAkgys34,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-12-13T00:37:06.191+0000) > > Why not tie if you can upvote or not on weather or not your level 30+ (not posting, just voting) After all if one is still super new to the game they usually don't know what is a good post or not to vote for. That would probably be a good idea to start with, it would at least make it slightly harder for the vote botters if anything else. I think at the moment you only need to be level 7 to vote on something on the boards. _If the time I spent as level 0 last week is anything to go by_.
> [{quoted}](name=wolvius,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=nAkgys34,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-12-13T00:42:08.958+0000) > > That would probably be a good idea to start with, it would at least make it slightly harder for the vote botters if anything else. > I think at the moment you only need to be level 7 to vote on something on the boards. _If the time I spent as level 0 last week is anything to go by_. have to be level 30 to upvote things.
: Why not tie if you can upvote or not on weather or not your level 30+ (not posting, just voting) After all if one is still super new to the game they usually don't know what is a good post or not to vote for.
> [{quoted}](name=Yordle Gunner,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=nAkgys34,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-12-13T00:37:06.191+0000) > > Why not tie if you can upvote or not on weather or not your level 30+ (not posting, just voting) After all if one is still super new to the game they usually don't know what is a good post or not to vote for. its already this way. level 7 to post, but need to be 30 to up/downvote things.
: > [{quoted}](name=Periscope,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=8ils8gT6,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-12-12T12:32:01.462+0000) > > I disabled votes on this thread. > > OP, if you did not report in the post game, you can write a support ticket regarding these players. > > If you have any questions about this moderation action, don't hesitate to reach out to the Boards Moderation Team via: > > * The [**NA Boards Discord**](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification) > * The [**Discuss the Boards**](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation) sub-board Hey, can you do the same with my "Flaming Dragon" thread? That -50 is a real eye sore to look at. ;)
Just pull a Superbowl and delete the thread and repost it when it gets botted
: Thank you riot for getting rid of the Penalty on Support..... but why a Nami Buff?
She's been a relatively great pick for a while, surprised riots actually gonna give a buff.
: Aphelios has the brute shotgun from halo
arcade kaisa looks like she has cut down energy swords
: exploiting the broken system and every one knows it
> players doing ranked should be demoted or summoner level lowered or both that are being detected for bad behavior on that note some times it's the victim of bad behavior that gets punished that has its own set of problems more on later. Youre punished by losing ranked rewards, making the entire point of ranked moot. and no, the "victim" of bad behavior doesnt exist. flaming a troll doesnt make a good guy bad guy, youre just 2 bad guys, one toxic, and one a douche. > now for the exploit of vote system that is sadly exploited and everyone agrees and dos it before a game ends > a targeted player bye group of players decide that this player will be reported with vote system ether this player is a victim of abuse or the punishment is justifiable in most case this is players just get reported and everyone dos it just causes they don't like someone for whatever reason. this isnt how the punishment system works in the least. its been stated repeatedly that one report or nine reports, only trigger a review, nothing more. chat based offenses are automated by a bot. therefore there is absolutely no bias towards context. > riot needs to highly consider making it harder for players to exploit this. players with a history of bad behavior vote should not even count I know this is the case and what is happening cause myself self have had a few accounts banned let me explain. > > so Example overtime I find my self losing my temper to other players' behavior toward me and then I have let the bad behavior community won and I say the wrong thing and result in me being banned. to combat this riot would need to overview reply the ai system can not detect falsely reported players. the end result I violated the rules instead of muting players trigging me if you lashed out and flamed poor play you weren't falsely banned. you were correctly banned for flaming. also ip bans are absolutely useless. not only does this ban people in places like a college or internet cafe, you can change it in seconds by: using a hotspot (phone, or public) VPN Mac spoofing ^ 2/3 of these can be done completely free.
Swéèts (NA)
: League getting worst
i don't see this person in your match history? edit: wait nvm, forgot to hit renew edit 2: wait how did he actually troll? what did he do? because being that it was a blind pick match, there are no roles, so it definitely isnt role stealing. so im guessing it was just him threatening to troll?
BeYQnD (EUNE)
: Ban account with wronk punishment
they tried infinitely scaling restrictions. when people couldnt flame they just inted or afk ran it down a lane.
CyberPhobic (EUNE)
: Why disable ad block? I am out of the loop
> [{quoted}](name=CyberPhobic,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=BkqhbbcX,comment-id=000b,timestamp=2019-12-10T20:40:43.941+0000) > > Why disable ad block? I am out of the loop Basically a YouTube Tos change. If they find that you're using something that makes you no longer "commercially viable" they can ban not only your YouTube account, but also restrict access to your entire Google account. No Gmail No drive No apps from Google play etc.
: So I disabled adblock on YouTube, and immediately I got hit with two 1+ minute un-skippable ads.
It was pretty vague being that they said they only would provided your aren't "commercially viable" They don't make money off of you by just displaying ads, they sell the info of what you watch as well and display them on other places that use googles ad tracking API, so think banner ads on something like spotify. Banning you gives them 0.00 But if what you're saying is what you're getting I'll gladly take a hard ban.
: > [{quoted}](name=FOR JUSTICE,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=iuYrwMOv,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-12-10T03:34:27.308+0000) > > so.... > > we just gonna ignore the other 4 games, two of which you had to lose, to say the last was """"stacked"""" against you? already addressed in this thread and it's logical to win 2 lose 2 with the algorithm trying to force you to 50% w/r
> [{quoted}](name=S Tier Waifu,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=iuYrwMOv,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-12-10T04:16:03.459+0000) > > already addressed in this thread and it's logical to win 2 lose 2 with the algorithm trying to force you to 50% w/r your promos as you stated is a best of 5. this makes no sense. especially considering if EVERYONE is being forced to 50%.... its a fair match that could go either way, as everyone has that 50% chance. you're basically saying its only in someones favor when they're on the enemy team.
PzyXo (EUW)
: Let us know when to dodge if they don't get banned?
laughable at best. you honestly think *this community* would actually flag legitimate trolls and not someone who just happened to go 0/5?
: I don't buy this bs
so.... we just gonna ignore the other 4 games, two of which you had to lose, to say the last was """"stacked"""" against you?
: Ranked Season did not actually end on the 19th. Or did it?
it ended the second it turned the 19th. 19th, at 00:00
Neriticc (EUW)
: So you buff crit without nerfing Yasuo and Trynda?
{{item:3191}} {{item:3047}} {{item:2420}} Also it's mathematically impossible for him to deal double damage to you being that his passive is literally modified crit damage.
Bultz (NA)
: Yorick needs to be nerfed
> [{quoted}](name=Bultz,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=bLGIgdzV,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-12-09T05:59:05.823+0000) > > Yorick needs to be nerfed. His minions or summonlings or whatever they are need to be 1 hit just like Malzhars are. damn thats crazy being that single target spells or attacks do one shot them 100% of the time because they are literally programmed this was as part of their ai, and malzahars actually dont, they just seem that way because malzahars has different base stats. most notably malzahars dont scale with his hp or at all. > His ult needs to die after a certain time and not just keep following him. His damage needs to be lowered by a great deal. This dude ran up to my tower and had it 3/4s dead on my like first back. its... almost as if hes a hard counter to darius? most notably when he gets his sheen. > His wall has been stunning me. It's a wall, why am I being stunned? it doesnt stun you, you're just being pushed away, like any other terrain that pops up on/under your champion in the game. > His minions have literally melted me in seconds. Just because no one wants to play him because he is a lame champion and no one wants to fulfill the "fantasy" of a grave digging hunchback, doesn't mean that he should stay at absurd levels of gameplay. His last rights needs to be gutted. Like dudes halving towers. Gut this champion. tower taking is his niche and you just got outplayed. sorry dude. any fed splitpusher will half towers as well, just yorick is front loaded on towers in exchange for terrible scaling.
rujitra (NA)
: They won’t get any rewards because they’re smurfing, which will be detected.
not only this but even if they did get passed smurf detection (which despite popular view most likely, they probably will) they would also be gaining rewards on throwaway accounts they arent playing with anyway. rather moot imo.
: No I am not a bot.
then simply dont? you as you already say yourself are under no obligation to actually have to; should they really not want to hear you they would just mute you. as long as you keep it legitimately constructive then you can literally not give a shit and say w/e.
Alex Luu (NA)
: Jungling XP and people taking camps
Ksariyu (NA)
: What Defines Role vs. Position.
Those identities are more how they play with your team, rather then the position they are played in. Anivia for example, although she is played mid she carries and aoe slow, a wall, and a small aoe stun. All of this utility is why she Is listed as more of a support, because these are things that benefit your team more, rather then yourself in most cases. Brand for example, deals a bunch of damage, hence why even though he is also a mage, he plays either or, but doesn't have very much utility. It's rather based off of what the champion actually does, and for the most part it's not exactly tied to a single role. Looking into champion classes and subclasses would work tons here.
pwc2016 (NA)
: Hey can we get new simple champions please?
? Neeko? Like 2 champ releases ago?
: > [{quoted}](name=FOR JUSTICE,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=XEUFsqsX,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-12-07T04:33:06.211+0000) > > or.... > > if you know they invaded go invade the opposite side? there is literally no reason to not if they're 5 manning. > > > that or keep better watch for invades, its not their fault you just got caught off guard. Except you don’t know they are invading until 1:15. And you cannot make it to their other buff (on the opposite side of the map) in time. -.-
thats a late invade. to which is countered immediately by a single ward when they left to leash, to which they very well have the opportunity to contest it. if they died anyway congrats, they died due to lack of attention. thats 100% on his own team.
94372148 (NA)
: Early game invades make the game worse and should be gotten rid of
or.... if you know they invaded go invade the opposite side? there is literally no reason to not if they're 5 manning. that or keep better watch for invades, its not their fault you just got caught off guard.
: way to much cc in this game.
hard cc is legit the only counter to constant hyper mobility
darryI (NA)
: Do you have to be on the same clash team both days?
iirc as long as youre a sub for them you should be fine, you can switch teams all you want before lock in.
Morglics (EUNE)
: you play pyke , probably you are just a bad player as every other pyke player, btw 2.2 kda seems very low imho mine is 3+ and i dont care at all about it
He has an entire 1 game on pyke.
klin537 (NA)
: does lp gain/loss have any basis in your stats that game?
No, lp gains are based purely off MMR, which is only affected by win/loss. Also not really, all this does is encourage greedy play, as well as the fact that you having a bunch of kills doesn't mean you're actually attempting to help your team, just like having an 0/9 tryndamere splitpushing top bringing 3 people toward him Is infinitely more valuable then a 10/0 lux support who just ignites someone already pretty much dead.
: Its absurd that any mage/support/Assass can get a free/600 gold zhonyas that throws counterplay out
Why are you attempting a dive with full hp damn well knowing they have stasis? Just walk up to bait it out first then actually attempt to dive. You can't zhonyas while in CC, therefore if they don't just kill them. Don't get mad at zhonyas/stopwatch/stasis because you got outplayed.
: Champion.gg also says >https://champion.gg/champion/Akali/Support The site's statistics are not trustworthy at all.
not sure how its statistics can be considered not trustworthy being that its derived from the official api, also yes, if someone picks akali into the support role it will damn well track it. quoting that has absolutely nothing to do with what he told you. ANY site can and will do the same: https://u.gg/lol/champions/akali/build?role=support riot willfully even admitted u.gg is the most accurate because it updates the most frequently.
Vlada Cut (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=boricCentaur1,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=QW0u2mIu,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-11-29T21:17:03.022+0000) > > Who? {{champion:133}} {{champion:67}} since they have always be able to top. Name one adc that isn't those two with more then a 3% playrate top. > > Adcs can't top. They don't have be meta picks to be viable pocket picks. That's the difference between actual meta and sleeper picks.
... except thats exactly what "meta" means. it has to be viable. you cant be viable if you arent meta. adc's dont viably go top, you just get outplayed or beat them like any other matchup.
: To People Complaining About Support Income
no one has a problem with how long it takes to complete an item, the problem is what happens after you complete around the second. THATS where the gold no longer remains a constant, and what supports are complaining about. sure you """"""save"""""" gold, but in reality you're sacrificing being gimped midgame. it would never show in something like lolalytics because it shows average completion times by first item. so while it is true you complete your FIRST item in about the same amount of time as before the support changes..... you're not gimped until the second.
MeowGath (NA)
: EUW server is actually in Amsterdam, The Netherlands
i can see where i went wrong, by "based in ireland" i mean they follow irish rulings.
Nea104 (EUW)
: Not only they don't do ANYTHING against bots, but **they DON'T even ban** them when they got **reported**. So... Maybe it's _intentional_? ^^
they do ban them, it just happens in waves. you cant insta ban them because that helps create scripts that are harder to detect, because you can create a bunch and see which ones get banned then simply find the common factor.
: to report sb. to the police.
Actually according to the official law riot would be required to report it to the authorities once it becomes suspicious. They don't have an obligation to actually give you individually anything. And even then for EUW the terms only apply to Irish laws. The euw server is based in ireland.
CyberPhobic (EUNE)
: So you think Vlad is a balanced champion? You believe Ryze is in a good place? You think Quinn top is fine?
Quinn top is in fact 100% fine. Annoying but she hasn't been overbearing for at least a season now. In either case she's always been a toplaner that's like complaining about ranged tops but saying teemo is a problem, because he's a toplaner. Ryze and Vlad are not but that's correlation not causation. They've historically *always* been cancer, has nothing to do with toplane.
forist (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=FOR JUSTICE,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=KNe9JPmi,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-11-27T03:36:53.249+0000) > > Riot Tantrum, the guy who programmed it, already explained it. > > If he says it, it is in fact the law. > > So yeah not a single portion of this thread is pretending anything. Can you link his explanation of riot's punishment system and criteria for punishment? I'm curious as to how it works.
https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/OeZ3ipZB-got-a-14-day-suspension-by-a-teammate-on-purpose?comment=000e00000003000000010000 https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/Jy25XVyR-no-chat-restrictions-level-5-honor-14-day-ban-for-trolling-in-chat-for-1-normal-game?comment=000400000000 https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/xAAcRMo4-the-incompatibility-of-zero-tolerance-with-the-tiered-penalty-system?comment=0007 https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/LTuaqaZH-why-do-i-get-a-14-day-suspension-for-getting-angry-at-inters?comment=00000000000000000000 https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/A1yJmhb1-suspension-14-days?comment=00010001000000010000000000000001 https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/2dLK3IWP-i-got-out-of-honor-0-in-5-days?comment=0005 https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/rIOgTf8s-riot-do-something-with-the-premades-already?comment=0001000000000001000100000000 https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/rIOgTf8s-riot-do-something-with-the-premades-already?comment=000100000000 https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/iE97lQZW-make-reporting-system-more-efficient?comment=00000000000000000001000000000000000000030001 https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/iE97lQZW-make-reporting-system-more-efficient?comment=0000000000000000000100000000 i can do you 8 better (10 links, two of these prove who tantrum actually is). its not all random gibberish on the boards, we've just literally been told how it works, repeatedly. its not pretend its from the designer himself edit: forgot to mention they even gave us a whole ass FAQ https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/207489286-Instant-Feedback-System-FAQ-
forist (NA)
: Can we stop making threads pretending to understand how the punishment system works? Riot purposely makes this system vague and unclear, so unless you actually work on the player behavior team; you don't know anything about how punishments and chat restrictions / bans are handled.
Riot Tantrum, the guy who programmed it, already explained it. If he says it, it is in fact the law. So yeah not a single portion of this thread is pretending anything.
Rioter Comments
datfatguy (OCE)
: Right because no counterplay is a very balanced concept
a champion with no counterplay isnt a balanced concept, except that isnt what this is in the slightest. a champion playing into their win condition is a balanced concept, so a lategame champion making it through early-midgame without overly feeding despite being at a blatant disadvantage for the majority of the game... yes, deserves every right to be a lategame carry.
datfatguy (OCE)
: Can we not make full build Kayle a guaranteed win?
well yes, thats what late game carry means. {{champion:222}} {{champion:45}} {{champion:420}} {{champion:141}} {{champion:11}} {{champion:61}} {{champion:235}} {{champion:134}} {{champion:67}} {{champion:29}} {{champion:18}} {{champion:112}} if allowed to reach late game there is pretty much no counterplay. thats literally the point.
Show more

FOR JUSTICE

Level 252 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion