: I had one of the best games of my life last night [Master Elo]
I LOVE seeing posts like these. No matter how shit the game gets, or how often I feel like quitting, THESE moments are why I keep playing this game. League is a game with very low lows, but very high highs. And its so easy to forget the latter. For every game we were frustrate and wanted to ff at 15, we have had a game where we got super fed and had the time of our lives. Thank you for makin this post. The boards need more positivity, and you my good sir just helped make my day with a smile.
: [SUGGESTION] Weighted Boots
I think it'd be interesting to do with all boots tbh. Like, give greater stats and\or passive, but give up on movespeed. {{item:3006}} would give 10% more attack speed but only give 30+ movespeed instead of 45 {{item:3117}} OoC movespeed increased from 115 to 180, but the standard 25+ movespeed is lowered to 15. {{item:3009}} Slow resist increased from 25% to 45%, flat bonus decreased from 55 to 40. {{item:3158}} cdr increased to 15%, sum spell cdr increased from 10 to 20%, movespeed decreased to 30. {{item:3111}} tenacity increased by 10%, MR increased by 5, movespeed decreased to 30. {{item:3047}} 12% aa block increased to 18%, armor increased by 5, and movespeed decreased to 30. {{item:3020}} magic pen increased to 25, movespeed decreased to 30. Any boot item built from {{item:2422}} gets only a +5 bonus instead of +10. I think it could actually be really fun, trading off the speed you get the boots for in exchange for extra stats. A huge risk reward thing.
: Most Satisfying Sound(s) In League?
{{champion:83}} Q feels so fuckin good, even just getting graves with it. {{champion:45}} Laughing automatically after killing someone with ult {{champion:111}} with an attack speed build, simply obliterates EVERYTHING that tries to do an aa fight with you (unless ya get poked for half your health beforehand)
BTheM (EUW)
: As Ivern main I have to explain how my abilites works almost every game
This was me as Zilean before his mini rework. while its common knowledge now, there was once a time when NOBODY knew how Zil's ult worked. I had games where I ulted people, they run away, wasting my ult, and when I ask why they said stuff like "Who the fuck knows how zilean works man" Tho now that people DO know how he works, enemies bait my ult now, so I ult a teammate mid fight and the enemies won't attack him so he doesn't get the revive. So either way whether people know how Zil's ult works or they don't, I'm fucked either way. :/
: I removed a video link due to its inappropriate title; you're free to repost the video, but not that particular one. If you have any questions about this moderation action, don't hesitate to reach out to the Boards Moderation Team via: * The [**NA Boards Discord**](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification) * The [**Discuss the Boards**](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation) sub-board
> [{quoted}](name=Periscope,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=1c1jB48e,comment-id=0019,timestamp=2019-02-15T06:37:30.011+0000) > > I removed a video link due to its inappropriate title; you're free to repost the video, but not that particular one. > > If you have any questions about this moderation action, don't hesitate to reach out to the Boards Moderation Team via: > > * The [**NA Boards Discord**](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification) > * The [**Discuss the Boards**](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation) sub-board I don't think people really care about something as trivial as a video title, especially since its a link people would have to go out of thier way to click it at all. If your going to remove a video link, maybe do so if the content of the actual video is bad, or if the video was meant to spark harrassment or drama. Simply removing because of a title alone seems really nitpicky. As a moderator you probably shouldn't nitpick over something like a title of a seperate link, youtube already has enough issues with its strict and vauge policies when it comes to titles and such, I doubt anybody wants shit like that here too. Not trying to be rude or anything, I am just offering a bit of advice. Your comment got over a hundred downvotes, as a moderator that is not a good sign. Maybe try to handle things in a way that people will take the mods here a bit more seriously, maybe even respect them. As it is now though, while I don't think you guys are power hungry by any means, you could certainly use some work in running things. Some of the best mods I have ever seen are on the Doki Doki Literature Club subreddit. Thier rules are clear and fair, they enforce them just as its written, no more no less, they actively communicate with the community not just as moderators, but as fans. They are open about changes and often let the community know when something goes on, and are logical in what they remove when somebodies emotional safety is at risk. They do a great job. When they show up, I think I want to learn from them not feel restricted in fear of petty removals over trivial things like a video title. I respect those moderators. I really truly wish I could say the same for the mods here. At the moment though, thats not the case. You guys do a great job at enforcing your rules, that i applaud you, but you do so in a way that is unclear. Many people here get stuff removed thinking it was a mistake, some say it was some say it wasn't. What is and isn't allowed is not clear. What you guys can work on is two things. Clarity and what is and isn't allowed, and interaction. Don't simply show up when shit goes down or when a rule gets broken, communicate with us like we all do. We want to feel like you are one of us, just another league player with a mod tag in their name. Right now though, there seems to be a gap bridging the players here and the mods. I hope you guys can fill that gap with an excellent bridge. Because even if you guys enforce the rules well, if you aren't respected, the natural circlejerky, sometimes toxic nature of these boards will never change if people don't have a reason to trust you guys. If you truly want to make these boards a better place, don't just mod the boards, be a part of it. If we can be like a great community, it can make a big difference. Think of it this way. We would rather be in a private school with set rules, but nothing too vague or strict, and we want to feel like we can always come to the teachers for a good talk or just whenever we feel something could be worked on. Right now it feels more like a juvie school, where there are set rules and they are strict and sometimes vague. People get in trouble all the time for breaking these rules, but many don't care because the teachers don't give the students a reason to trust or respect them. odd analogy but its what I came up with. You guys as mods truly can make the boards a better place. But right now you fellas aren't as respected as other members of the community, even thoiugh you are the dang mods. Above all, I hope you all can work on your public appearance here. If we can respect you, we are naturally more inclined to follow the rules. Your lack of good publicty here just makes people not care to listen. sorry for the rant, I just wanted to give my two cents. I just want you to think about your comment here. "I made a comment about a removal and it got over 100 downvotes? As a mod that isn't good. How can I work on my duties to make sure this doesn't happen again?" I hope you have a great weekend. May you be able to play league happily.
: That wasn't purple smoke
I saw purple smoke and clicked thinking this was some elaborate Jojo reference (Fugo's stand in Jojo part 5 is called Purple Smoke in the anime) but you still make a great point.
: All for one bugged... Only four Vel'Koz
Its one for all, not all for one... hard to laugh at the meme when the joke is ruined by a misworded title.
: Tell me your 3 most played champions and I will tell you your personality and greatest fear.
densi (EUW)
: WHAT FUCKING GAME
Rioter Comments
: Just won like 5 games in a row, let the losing streak begin!
I ONLY play norms but I 100% agree. I get this feeling constantly
: When was the last time you seen any mage that wasn't in your list of champs you just named? It's not just assassins that don't see any play whats so ever in the mid lane, it's a whole lot of other mages too.
Veigar is picked a decent amount as an azir counter, but only as an azir counter. However, that is a mage that isnt on the list. I have found an exception in your statement. Mages aside from what he listed show up every now and again (like veigar) just not often. So you can't say something that implies ones that aren't in his list are never played in pro like that. also {{champion:136}} , {{champion:90}} ,{{champion:7}} , {{champion:25}} , {{champion:112}} , and {{champion:26}} are all played every now and again in pro. Not the most often, and some here not as much as they used to, but they still get picked from time to time. Therefore his list of Taliyah, Ryze, Vlad, Syndra, Ori, Azir, and Cass are not LITERALLY the only mages picked in pro like your statement implied as such.
: Luden's Echoes is Straight Up Inferior Compared to the Other Jungle Items.
Its Runic Echoes...You messed up the title dude..what the hell man, saying the wrong name of an item? Shame on you. Luden's echo is the main mage ap item Runic echoes is the jg version. Runic {{item:1402}} Ludens {{item:3285}} Your point goes out the damn window if you can't get the name right.
Azadethe (NA)
: You can claim they've talked about it in a Red Post all you want, but I certainly don't see one, and you didn't provide a link. Even if they did, they haven't done an iota to it and this is actually a champion breaking change. It would have taken 15 minutes to upload a patch to revert the change until they've figured it out. There are Red Posts about these champs, but no Jhin, or expressly about Ginsoo's other than the quick patch note statement : 3000 was too cheap. {{champion:104}} {{champion:121}} {{champion:39}} {{champion:142}} {{champion:99}}
I thought I wouldn't have to link it because anybody with basic commin fucking sense would know already, but because your a special one who doesnt follow the rest posts for whatever reason, here it is. https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/87ol1d/a_thought_on_jhin_and_rageblade/dwg6cdd/?context=2 Don't claim they didn't discuss jhin when they did, right here. And don't use the "I didn't know" excuse, not knowing is just another form of stupidity. You would know if you just did your bloody research. People shit on riot for stuff they have already addressed all the damn time and it makes me sick. Riot said it somewhere, and you don't even have to do any digging, its all on surrender at 20. Just read every new update they have on the site by checking back every day. Its not hard. I have been checking on surrenderat20 for a couple years now, it baffles me why others dont do the same. It won't take too much time. Using time to stay educated on the game is better then spouting misinformation and looking like a fucking bafoon.
Azadethe (NA)
: @ Meddler: Is Riot going to address the collateral damage caused by their change to Ginsoo's?(Jhin)
Dude they just discussed the math behind it and said they are working on a fix less than a week ago. Do you even keep up with the red responses? read the Red Post Collections on Surrenderat20.net regularly and you won't miss stuff like this. "Is riot going to address it" They already have dont spread misinformation by implying they havent yet.
: Xin+Pantheon Bot lane is the ultimate kill lane. Just gotta make sure u got someone who is ranged to take towers from another positions. Corki or tf mid would be good.
Interesting.. Thanks for the insight! Any idea why champgg says supp xin still takes smite and flash tho?
Rioter Comments
y0r1ck (NA)
: Bro I been saying this since forever. It's legit the most fun support I've ever played, it's the only reason i still play league. It's really cool to see others doing it. Though I've found that in matchups where you don't need the extra points in w asap, it's better to max q. Maxing q allows you to hold your own against tops and allows you to carry bot lane with damage early on while still transitioning to a disruptor in the late game. Also q max helps solo herald and dragon and baron. Usually I go for q max unless I have an adc with heavy aoe. Also if you get warmogs you should get zzrot instead of banner, it scales with hp and allows you to be even more dangerous to enemy towers. If you go banner you won't need the warmogs and should get the other giants belt items. W second is better than e second. Though this might be because I take aftershock a lot. Other than those few things I agree with your analysis ^_^ Edit: how do you play the rakan, leona, Zyra, and Anivia matchups?
I haven't done this TOO much yet to suggest how to do certain matchups, tho I did face a rakan and he fucked me real hard tbh. XD For stuff like rakan or leo who have a dash kind of engage, I'd save the w for when they use it and trap them in w once they went in. For Zyra and anivia, while I haven't faced those, I'd try n play safe, since those matchups have long range damage, and just w whenever they get caught out enough to be in YOUR range, I mean your specifically, if Zyra comes closer to try and Q or ult your adc, use that opportunity to punish her with your w. I mainly went armogs just cuz it meant it would bring me past 3K hp, and if I barely survived a fight I'd be back to full in a bit, tho your suggestion is certainly something I'd take into account. I max Q first on Yor when I play top lane, but I prefer maxing w first as supporick because its your main ability in bot lane, and the lower cooldown helps, plus at later ranks when it gets 3 to 4 hp, that basically means it has to last the full 4 seconds cuz they won't have enough attack speed to destroy it in that time without them sacrificing damage by autoing you and your carry. I also think supporick is THE BEST SUPPORT if you have a {{champion:67}} adc, as she can get EASY stuns when you trap an enemy in your W. Cool to see someone else does this tho. ^^ Why dun ya go ahead and add me on league? Maybe we can hang sometime.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: I thought finishing a jungle item on ivern is a bannable offence
> [{quoted}](name=SQR Poison,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=1OkZe0pv,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-01-13T01:19:36.546+0000) > > I thought finishing a jungle item on ivern is a bannable offence *offense Spelling is important kids.
: > [{quoted}](name=GudLunchHavFries,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=WhBPFaXH,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2018-01-12T04:59:31.417+0000) > > Why should they make the time shorter? You only get to honor level 0 or 1 if you were penalized, meaning you most likely deserved it. Its supposed to be a punishment, why should the lighten it at all? > > Thats like saying you should be spanked with a hand instead of a belt simply because it hurts less. The spanking is meant for discipline, making it less harsh destroyes some of the purpose of a punishment in general. > > And yeah, maybe the spanking comparison is somewhat of an outdated analogy to use, and there is something better I could have used, but I'm tired, and thats what I came up with. :P Well 1st thing is its triple punishment...14 day ban/25 chat restrict..then a long lock out period, then you start the endless void of level 0. When people who were honor level 5 get dropped to 0 and it takes them LONGER to get from 0-1 than it took them to get from 2-5 then there is a serious problem. It can only be one of 2 things.....the 2-5 journey is too fast and easy.....or the punishment tiers are WAY over tuned compared to the other tiers. Instead of spanking I'll use a video game analogy( I'll use final fantasy 7)....levels 2-5 is a normal game progression with clear check and save points. Now imagine you couldn't even play the intended game till you beat the 2 super bossed (emerald and ruby weapon) aka honor levels 0 and 1 with no health bars displayed on the enemies. They are so over tuned compared to the rest of the game that you are wondering if you are even putting a dent in them and you are wondering how long is this going to fking take. Meanwhile, you look over and see your buddies beat the entire game( go from levels 2-5) before you even beat 1 super boss. I know this may not be the best example and seem ridiculous but that is legit how hard the punishment tiers are.
> [{quoted}](name=themachamp,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=WhBPFaXH,comment-id=00060000,timestamp=2018-01-12T05:24:23.398+0000) > > Well 1st thing is its triple punishment...14 day ban/25 chat restrict..then a long lock out period, then you start the endless void of level 0. > > When people who were honor level 5 get dropped to 0 and it takes them LONGER to get from 0-1 than it took them to get from 2-5 then there is a serious problem. It can only be one of 2 things.....the 2-5 journey is too fast and easy.....or the punishment tiers are WAY over tuned compared to the other tiers. > > Instead of spanking I'll use a video game analogy( I'll use final fantasy 7)....levels 2-5 is a normal game progression with clear check and save points. Now imagine you couldn't even play the intended game till you beat the 2 super bossed (emerald and ruby weapon) aka honor levels 0 and 1 with no health bars displayed on the enemies. They are so over tuned compared to the rest of the game that you are wondering if you are even putting a dent in them and you are wondering how long is this going to fking take. Meanwhile, you look over and see your buddies beat the entire game( go from levels 2-5) before you even beat 1 super boss. I know this may not be the best example and seem ridiculous but that is legit how hard the punishment tiers are. That is a great analogy, with one issue. The analogy you used take the time into account rather then the point of the punishment itself. Its a punishment, they have every right to make it as long as they do, because if you behave you won't get to honor 0 or 1. Lightening a punishment destroys the point of a punishment somewhat. A punishment is meant to teach a lesson. If it was the same lenth has getting from 2-5, someone might not be compelled enough to behave, because if 0-2 is the same length as 2-5, then they could make it back to 2 in like 3 months (2-3 months is an estimate of how long it took me to reach honor 5) anyway. 2-3 months isn't that long if you think about it, if the punishment length is too short, some may not care about the punishment enough so they don't care if they go to honor 0. The punishments need to be severe if you want everybody to reform, if its too light the more stubborn folks can get punished over and over and not really care. I was always raised with large discipline in mind. My step brother for example, lied about his grades one time. Thats it, just a lie. His punishment was to have everything except his bed and dresser removed from his room, and be able to earn his stuff back slowly but surely by having good behavior, earning one of his items (such as tv, games, wall decorations, etc) and earning 1 thing back per week. Took around half a year for him to get all his stuff back, but man after that he sure didn't lie again to our step dad for almost a decade. Before I post this response, I wanted to say I apologize if I sound rude or stubborn. I'm somewhat short on time so I can't reword things to be as polite as I'd hope. I don't want this debate to become heated in any way, and so far I don't think it is, but I wanted to clarify I don't mean to be rude or mean when I say all this. I've just been raised with harsh discipline, so this is how I see things, and if I appear closed minded once again I apologize. I hope however this discussion continues or ends, you have lots of fun on the rift, no matter what honor level you may be.
: Jhin can one-shot too. Most carry champions can one-shot if they get fed and/or are targeting a squishy champion.
> [{quoted}](name=Votable Jester,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=jxgrkUel,comment-id=00000000000000020000,timestamp=2018-01-09T21:11:48.256+0000) > > Jhin can one-shot too. > > Most carry champions can one-shot if they get fed and/or are targeting a squishy champion. Thats true too. Meanwhile I mained old {{champion:45}} and I cri every time I see someone one shot someone. I miss when I could right click you and your entire health bar was gone, why does Veigar get that taken away from him but champs like {{champion:142}} and {{champion:202}} are allowed to one shot with a single ability/click? Even a fed af late game veigar with 1000 ap cant oneshot with his ult anymore cuz when they are full hp the ap ratio is lower then 100%, RIP old veigar ult. On another note, I've seen a couple videos of people building crit on SA {{champion:141}} and one shotting an entire champion with a single auto. Also Anklespankin did a video on ap {{champion:39}} recently and there was one point where one ability one shot someone in that video, though I dunno too much about Irelia so idk how the ap build does that.
: The journey from honor level 0-1 should not take longer the entire journey from 2-5.
Why should they make the time shorter? You only get to honor level 0 or 1 if you were penalized, meaning you most likely deserved it. Its supposed to be a punishment, why should the lighten it at all? Thats like saying you should be spanked with a hand instead of a belt simply because it hurts less. The spanking is meant for discipline, making it less harsh destroyes some of the purpose of a punishment in general. And yeah, maybe the spanking comparison is somewhat of an outdated analogy to use, and there is something better I could have used, but I'm tired, and thats what I came up with. :P
koshkyra (NA)
: No she doesnt. She lands her E, then Qs you and probably needs an auto to proc her passive too. She either two shots or three shots you. She does not one shot, i dont know where you're getting that from.
> [{quoted}](name=JamesTheMage15,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=jxgrkUel,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2018-01-08T20:05:42.828+0000) > > No she doesnt. > > She lands her E, then Qs you and probably needs an auto to proc her passive too. > > She either two shots or three shots you. She does not one shot, i dont know where you're getting that from. actually if a Zoe gets really fed she can 1 shot with just a q. I played a game as jhin where by late game Zoe had over 900 ap, she didnt even need to land her e to take out my entire health bar. And yeah, she was fed, people always do crazy damage when fed. But when you say she doesn't one shot and leave it at that with no other clarifications, you therefore imply that in 100% of situations, not matter how fed, zoe can't one shot. You never said that, but your word choice implied such. If she gets fed she can one shot. Its not a 2 or 3 shot 100% of the time like you imply with your choice of words and lack of specifications.
Rioter Comments
Broporo (NA)
: If your phone was connected to the same wifi as the pc you were using for League, it could definitely slow cause issues but I wouldn't think that should prevent you from playing normally with just a radio streaming service going. Do me a favor and check out the steps in this [**connection guide**](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/201752664-Troubleshooting-Connection-Issues) for some basic troubleshooting and let me know if that helps or not!
Also lag report gives me an application error. Used it once before and that ndidnt happen.
Broporo (NA)
: If your phone was connected to the same wifi as the pc you were using for League, it could definitely slow cause issues but I wouldn't think that should prevent you from playing normally with just a radio streaming service going. Do me a favor and check out the steps in this [**connection guide**](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/201752664-Troubleshooting-Connection-Issues) for some basic troubleshooting and let me know if that helps or not!
I'ma do dat connection guide now. Tho I do think I should point out that not only is my phone connected to the same wifi as my pc, we also have 4 other cell phones in my household, an ipod, and a laptop also connected to the internet at all times. That isn't even counting 4 different 3ds's, 2 VITA's, an xbox one, a ps4, a switch, a wiiu, and another desktop that we also own, but obvs aren't connected to the internet all the time as they aren't constantly being used like the first list. Would the smartphone streaming possible be the thing to push it over the edge? I should note my sister also uses pandora alot, as well as watched netflix, but this is my first time streaming music of any kind, so thats possibly 1, 2, or 3 streamings going on at once, tho most likely just 1, as the odds of 2 or more happening at the same time is rather rare.
Rioter Comments
: What dumb things did you do/say when you started League?
Near when I started I would rush {{item:3069}} EVERY GAME for the gold passive and regen. However, what was even MORE dumb of me, is I didn't know items had actives, so I rushed talisman every game and NOT ONCE did I use its active. XD
Varissar (EUW)
: By FQA: >*IP & Blue Essence >Are you making any changes to the way disenchanting shards works? >**Since you'll be getting more shards thanks to the new leveling system (and with other recent changes to honor and events), we'll tune down the relative value of the essence you get from disenchanting shards of all types—champ shards, skin shards, and ward skin shards.** >In the current system, for example, disenchanting a champ shard will get you about a third of the BE you need to buy a champ at that shard's tier. In the new system it'll get you 20% of the way there. Also, with so many more champ shards in the system, we need to remove the ability to reroll them into permanent champs—but we’ll occasionally sell mystery champions for blue essence. For these reasons, you should go ahead and reroll or disenchant any shards you don't want to upgrade before preseason hits so you can get the most essence possible out of them. >To make up for essence drop rate changes, we'll tune the way loot boxes work to increase the amount of skins you'll get from them. We'll also add "bad luck protection," so you won't ever go on long streaks without getting a skin shard or a gemstone from chests. Do you think this is "clearly informing the costumer"? A miserable paragraph in a IP AND BLUE ESSENCE TOPIC? But hey, it was clearly outspoken to the community. It was accessible beyond doubt. No one would have missed it between all the FQA. EDIT: I just wanted to say I am going to dwell into all the propaganda regarding the preseason, because surely I will find a nicely done, clear and concise announcement regarding OE drop in value right, right?
Yes, it IS clearly informing. You just gave proof that riot told us all beforehand, and as such we as players cannot blame them if we didn't knoe this information. They FLAT OUT told it to us. If one is too lazy to look at the details behind preseason before jumping in, that was their own decision, and decisions have consequences. If one didn't see this news when it was stated, as you have shown, riot can't be blamed for that. They told us beforehand, that is a fact. If they really wanted to hide it from us they would have not said it at all. They DID tell us, so we WERE informed beforehand, if WE didn't see even tho riot DID tell us, how is that riot's fault? Just go to surrender@20 regularly to be up to date on league news and rioter comments, its simple, easy, and not that hard. I check the latest updates on the site before I load up league, so I am always kept up to date. Why others wouldn't do the same despite the consequences is beyond me.
Varissar (EUW)
: An honest opinion regarding the OE debacle: an open letter to reply Riot Cactopus
I disagree with the fact that the OE changes were poorly communicated. It WAS in the preseason FAQ. If people were too lazy to read that to know the details of preseason that is their own fault, not riot.
One35 (NA)
: Your Least Favorite Champion in the Game
{{champion:99}} and {{champion:35}} They just annoy the hell out of me and I really struggle to face them both. As much as I HATE {{champion:238}} I ban {{champion:99}} every time I play mid cuz her sheer existence tilts me before the game even starts. Then both lux and Zed will be free soon, RIP I'll prolly end up facing zed alot when I ban Lux. Shaco isn't NEARLY as annoying to me since his rework (he used to be my 100% ban every game champ, thats how much I hated em) but when he gets fed I have war flashbacks and I get fucked from the tilt. On a side note, I have zero clue how to lane against {{champion:164}} , especially as an immobile top laner. she is such cancer imo, not sure how many will agree on that nowadays tho.
: > [{quoted}](name=GudLunchHavFries,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Xrp3XyK8,comment-id=0021,timestamp=2017-11-29T02:30:28.913+0000) > > Um, riot was rather clear about it, people were just too lazy to look at the preseason FAQ on the site, which was posted ages ago. > > It makes me cringe that people don't know about this change when it was in the FAQ, do people not keep up to date on league news? Surrender@20 is a great way to keep up to date, and it helps me see alot of riot comments I would have missed otherwise. > > I personally think that saying riot "tried to hide" this change is complete bullshit. Downvote all you want, I don't mind. Not riot's fault when they announce something and nobody pays attention. i dont recall much on the topic of OE just BE. I wish i had kept track of things now so i can gauge whether this is fair or not. I think there are some things lacking in the new BE system but as far as OE goes, i just dont know.
> [{quoted}](name=SocietysUnwanted,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Xrp3XyK8,comment-id=00210000,timestamp=2017-11-29T02:58:15.532+0000) > > i dont recall much on the topic of OE just BE. I wish i had kept track of things now so i can gauge whether this is fair or not. I think there are some things lacking in the new BE system but as far as OE goes, i just dont know. They did announce the OE changes in the preseason FAQ. If you didn't know about it even though they directly mentioned the changes, thats not riot's fault in any way shape or form. If they really wanted to hide the changes like OP suggests, they would not have mentioned it at all. Ya can't be mad at riot for being caught off guard, they mention stuff like that beforehand specifically so that doesnt happen. Riot isn't to blame here, they announced those changes, people shouldn't talk shit like they are in the right just because they were too lazy to read the FAQ.
StealthG (EUNE)
: Orange Essence Changes you probably didnt notice.
Um, riot was rather clear about it, people were just too lazy to look at the preseason FAQ on the site, which was posted ages ago. It makes me cringe that people don't know about this change when it was in the FAQ, do people not keep up to date on league news? Surrender@20 is a great way to keep up to date, and it helps me see alot of riot comments I would have missed otherwise. I personally think that saying riot "tried to hide" this change is complete bullshit. Downvote all you want, I don't mind. Not riot's fault when they announce something and nobody pays attention.
Rioter Comments
: PBE Balance changes to champions are NOT based on optimal runes as RIOT said they would be.
Love the post and all But I couldn't help but CRINGE when you said shyv gets devourer, when that isn't in the game anymore. Its been bloodrazor for the longest time. Plz use correct names.
: Who has the most satisfying execute ult?
Cho ult isnt an execute, he is just rewarded for usin it as the killing blow. It doesnt deal more damage based on enemy missing hp like an execute does Volibear W is an execute tho, and thats not on the list. Its Veigar, not Veiger. Someone didn't do their research.
Rioter Comments
Eranell (EUW)
: The one little buff that would make Yorick the splitpusher he deserves to be.
As a Yorick main I love this post. But you said shyv w was a one time auto enhancer. Thats actually her Q. I couldn't help but feel juuuuuuuust a bit triggered at that. :P
: What games are you playing?
Been playin alot of games lately, Nier Automota, Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, persona 5, hyperdimension neptunia rebirth 1, the sims 3 on pc, etc. REALLY looking forward to Sonic Forces, Pokemon Ultra Sun, minecraft together forever update coming to switch, etc.
Rioter Comments
: i mean i get it we all want mastery 7 and the emote and so on.. but its harder and harder to get the S+ now then when the system 1st came out... its based on a algorithm with a table of vaules based on averages of games played by X champ in Y role and it compares your stats to those tables and in order to get the S+ you have to be in top 5% of those values , but as more and more games are played on X champ in Y role those values change and the top of those values get closer and closer to statistically speaking a "perfect game" so every time someone gets an S+ the averages changes cuz people just get better and better maining a champ its similar to being in school and the test is graded on a curve... if the highest grade is an 89 then the curve is 11 points but if the highest grade due to the nerd is 99 the curve is 1 and your grade that is 59 and need that 11 points to pass, well now you only get 1... and fail . ( so to get around this... is to play the champ in a non common/off meta role cuz those values arent as ingrained yet )
Yeah, I know thats how it works, but thats kind of the easy way out. I want my mastery 7 to feel like it was earned, ya'know? It just kinda sucks seeing me do so much to towers, taking out 3/4ths of em that the enemy team had, and have it treated like that bit of data, the most important bit, doesn't mean anything. It feels like the system is too heavily leaned towards bigger carry positions. I can get an S on Veigar WAY easier, and he is my secondary, but thats cause its much easier to carry with him in the traditional sense. At least thats how it feels anyway. Thanks for the talk, I appreciate it. ^^
: your kda isnt great, and for a game to be over 40 mins your cs is a lil on the low side , i say your kda hurt you the most also your kill % was only 41% ( i know yorick is split push ) and for a 42 min game 14 wards isnt great
Yeah, I can admit to all that. I've had many more Yorick games where I've had near 400 cs, over that on one occassion. It was also my fault that I forgot to change to blue trinket until much later than I usually do, as for the kill %, as much as I want compensation on grades for champions who are structured around generally not having that much normally, I can't make excuses. Like I said, as much as I think my tower control is great, I need to work on my play elsewhere. I need to improve if I want mastery 7, I can admit that. I appreciate the feedback, constructive critizisms is always great.
Rioter Comments
: Patch 7.19 notes
They just called Mundo Q, infected cleaver, his W in those bugfixes... SLIGHTLY TRIGGERED.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: It helps you relieve stress? Basically you're too young or simple-minded to handle your emotions and also enough of an ahole to take it out on others. Conclusion: LoL has too many children, when it shouldn't be allowed for children in the first place considering the negative effects it has on them.
> [{quoted}](name=ChillYoTits,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=ALOukoix,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2017-09-04T04:04:57.942+0000) > > It helps you relieve stress? > Basically you're too young or simple-minded to handle your emotions and also enough of an ahole to take it out on others. > > Conclusion: LoL has too many children, when it shouldn't be allowed for children in the first place considering the negative effects it has on them. I agree, hell, I think it a step further. I don't think children should be allowed to game online unless any type of communication from strangers is removed (like disabling voice chat on your kid's console) I have been gaming all of my life, and I was entirely an offline gamer till I got my xbox 360 in 2011, and even then I was still somewhat young, so my parents disbled voice chat unless the person was on my friends list, which made sense cuz I had some irl friends I wanted to hang with. And honestly I am so grateful. I played a good bit of online games back in my xbox days, and BOY I sucked ass, and I know for a fact if those family settings didn't basically automute everyone in the whole game, the hate I would have gotten for my skill would have discouraged me from online gaming entirely, and I would have never gotten to experience the amazingness that is league. Hell, children, both actual children and manchild people (like me) tend to be more sensitive, if a child was playing call of duty and someone was cussing them out or making fun of them, it could really hurt them emotionally, and as such I think young children should be offline gamers, or at the very least game online but set restrictions so they can't talk to strangers, until they are old enough to accept that people are assholes (which makes no sense to me, but I digress) and are able to not take every insult to heart. If I had played league back during my xbox days or any time before, my young mind would have been so hurt (I actually have asbergers, my college even gives me compensation for my mental disabilities) and I would have never gamed online again. When it comes to children and online gaming, timing and setup is crucial. Thats just my personal opinion though, if any of ya'll disagree thats fine, I won't judge.
Show more

GudLunchHavFries

Level 123 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion