: How long have you been playing and why do you keep playing?
So I don't know what season I started in, but I think it was a little before Rek'Sai's original release. Never played a MOBA before, didn't even know what it meant, and never heard of league before. One of the guys in my class in college told me about this game he plays thats absolutely free to play, and me being an utterly broke college student, i was intrigued. I tried it and only kept playing cause it was free. I didn't know what I was doing, building multiples of the same item, building AP on AD champs, blah blah blah... I slowly learned my way around the game, what to do and how to do it, and started to enjoy it more. I think I enjoyed this game so much cause I'm a huge loot/rpg sucker, and I mean huge. Borderlands 2 is my favorite, put hundreds of hours in it, still play a little Destiny now and then; I guess I love the feeling of leveling up, becoming more powerful, and getting items to help in that. Anyways, I don't play as much lately cause I just have too much to do and I don't feel like I'm having as much fun with it anymore. Lately I've been playing Paragon on PS4, and having fun with it. Its way more difficult for me than league due to it being a 3rd person game. I'm having to learn how to aim skill shots all over again. Paragon also feels a little more balanced to me structure-wise, with ADCs having to aim their autos. I guess it just feels like it takes more skill. I still find myself coming back to league though. I still can have fun with it, but I don't play pvp anymore. I think the biggest thing league has that other games don't is the characters, these are some of my favorite characters in video games. Sion is easily my favorite, love his lore/backstory so much, and characters like Jhin, Nautilus, Brand, and Draven just aren't available anywhere else.
Penns (EUW)
: What exactly do people expect from assassins?
So, I have...controversial...opinions regarding assassins, and I'll do my best not to piss everyone off at once. What I want from assassins... I want to not feel cheated, if that makes sense. I'll give an example: I hate Leblanc with extreme passion & probably forever will. Why? Because ever sense I started playing she was the assassin that could jump in, insta-kill me, and pop out without me or my team ever having a chance to react. While the argument of "you didn't build mr on jinx, you deserve it" might make sense to a normal human being. I can't help but still feel cheated. So I guess, I want to feel like I have a chance for outplay and a chance to live; even though it will end up being "oh wow, I just got deleted but at least I had a chance to live...which I missed..."
Rioter Comments
: Break a champion without changing their numbers
Draven: Axes now have "homing technology." Draven now automatically catches all axes. Sion: Q no longer needs to charge up. Sion: E now treats champions like minions.
GigglesO (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=HellsTrueKing,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=mY65vQuf,comment-id=0016,timestamp=2017-02-15T22:36:05.119+0000) > > Ok so...im...not that well versed in moba things.... > > Can someone explain the issue here? I'm assuming it has something to do with flat armor pen & percent armor pen applying at different times, but that's just my shot in the dark. So if you apply flat armor pen (lethality) after percent armor pen, you get the full value. IF you apply flat armor pen before, you get roughly half. Whats happening, is they are taking 300 armor tanks down to 70 or less armor making it almost impossible to play against them as tanks.
Ok so you want flat armor pen to apply first so it still does its job, but isn't overbearing. Thank you for the explanation.
: So shut the hell up. They get it. It's stupid strong. They got it days ago. Now shut up and move on with your life and stop obsessing about some stupid online videogame that much. Don't like it? Play another game (like you said you would) and get off the boards with your stupid spam.
So I'm curious about this... You obviously don't like the fact that he keeps posting about the same thing. My curiosity lies in the fact that you care enough to reply to his post telling him to "shut the hell up." Why does it bother you so much? I'm not criticizing, I'm legitimately curious.
GigglesO (NA)
: Make Flat armor pen apply first...
Ok so...im...not that well versed in moba things.... Can someone explain the issue here? I'm assuming it has something to do with flat armor pen & percent armor pen applying at different times, but that's just my shot in the dark.
: Am I the only one that's never felt like Kindred is 2 separate beings?
I think it would be awesome to get a legit 2 person champ, meaning, you have two champions with separate skill sets and you have to control both. For example: Bill & Ted Bill & Ted is a champion that is actually two separate people that can be controlled separately (much like switching stances on Jayce). While Bill & Ted have skills unique to each of them, you can only control one at a time. The ultimate switches the player's control from Bill to Ted and vise versa. While you are controlling one, the other is permanently locked in place until control is taken. The control can be switched between them globally and the death of either Bill or Ted is treated like the death of a champion, meaning if you kill both Bill and Ted, DOUBLE KILL. Thats just an example of what I'm thinking of, however it might be impossible to implement without feeling unfair.
: Did you know that when you stack Black Cleaver, Lord Dominik's, and Lethality...
What if with the next class update (tank or vanguard, can't remember), they introduced a new tank item(s) that countered the armor pen builds? Something like a rumduins omen but with an anti-armor pen passive. "unique passive: Can't Scratch This. Armor penetration effects reduced 50%" I know this is not the way it should be dealt with, but lets face the facts...Riot will not remove armor pen.
Rioter Comments
Meddler (NA)
: We're not planning any changes to Sion specifically. It's likely we'll make some tweaks to defensive base stats on most or all tanks, that'll just be small number changes rather than ability modifications though.
That's so good to hear, you don't even know....I can put my worries to rest. Sion is easily the best rework to date and my personal favorite. No need to fix what ain't broke...right...
Ralanr (NA)
: Sion can auto attack during his passive. Koggy cannot.
But Koggy does true damage. Plus he gets a movement speed buff for 4 seconds, where as Sion gets one boost for 1.5 seconds. I'd even be satisfied with allowing Sion to have more than one speed boost, like one per skill instead of just one. Even with the speed boost, it feels like most champs can still walk away without a worry.
Ralanr (NA)
: I know that Sion shouldn't be directly touched in the Vanguard update.
Even the idea of Riot touching Sion makes me nervous...but...if they HAD to do anything... I would want them to help make his passive actually feel useful and not pointless. Maybe add CC immunity to his passive, that would be awesome (people would still walk away from him, but have to start somewhere) In a game where every champ on the rift has some form of CC, his zombie passive feels just as pointless as Aatrox's (yeah that bad). On that note, someone enlighten me on this...why does Sion's passive get to be affected by CC, and Kog'maw's passive doesn't? Makes no sense to me (then again it is Riot).
: he's one of 3 mages I love dearly I had an idea to make his wall a tether instead of a big slow, not a hard CC but more of "you can't move X distance away if the wall grabs you"
What if the wall moved with him? You could lower the slow, that way it isn't so bad, but at least it would create a safer zone around him.
: Remove a stat because a few select champions abused it. Yet, you can't remove flat armor pen, you've got to have it exist in some form, despite every variant having some select few champions abusing it. Frankly the existence of {{item:3074}} {{item:3812}} {{item:3085}} and lifesteal's interaction with crits, means that every argument which was being made against spellvamp on those couple of champions could be made to just about every AD champion.
: Lifesteal working off base damage instead of the bonus damage would work.
This is true. Although my curiosity was leaning toward forcing ADCs to have either crits or life steal and not both. That way items like blood thirster would be the same, but you wouldn't be getting the full benefit if you also bought IE.
: Then you missed out. Tahm, Sion and Kled, all wonderful.
What about Nasus? His voice is awesome...
: Jhin, the Master piece of Riot game
Jhin is interesting. Probably one of the most interesting characters in the game. A psychopath who sees the beauty in death...come on... However, I never got there with kit. Jhin's suppose to be this sniper (not like Caytlin, a real sniper), which is why I like his snare and his awesome ult. His traps and grenade, on the other hand, always bothered me. First of all, I think his traps are damn near useless (unless going full AP). They only really serve as wards in a way. His gernade is more of a thematic problem than a gameplay one. Why the hell does a SNIPER have a short range bouncing gernade? Makes zero sense to me. I think you'd have an easier argument for something like a smoke grenade (think Graves'). On a side note....I always wanted them to do something more interesting with his skills because of his theme. Like...what if, his trap is no longer that but now a new CC, called mesmerized. Jhin "mesmerizes" his target with a grand piece of art. Think along the lines of airy's charm. Still, one of my favorite ADCs, just behind Draven.
Wygol (EUW)
: Why do AD Champions get to build Lifesteal and regain huge chunks of health in burst
Kind of off topic but...why did they remove spell vamp? I really can't remember. I'm also not sure of the interaction between life steal and crit. If I remember correctly, life steal works off of crit, which I'm not too sure how I feel about. I would really like to see what happens if they added something along the lines of critical chance lowers % life steal. Just my curiosity I guess...
Rioter Comments
: RIOT, please postpone Blood Moon Diana and make it into a Legendary skin.
I'm pretty much with you here...except...I'm struggling not to be let down by this skin. Don't get me wrong, I think they've done a great job, but I can't help the feeling that the idea was somehow better in my head. I think the splash is fucking awesome, as well as the particles. My only real problems with the skin is the recall and her model. I think her recall is a little disappointing, especially when compared to the others. As far as the model goes, I don't know, it just seems to bright to me. It seems more like pink moon Diana than blood moon Diana. So far I'm a little disappointed cause Diana should be the best one in the bunch, she is THE moon champion after all. For now, I'll. Postpone my condemnation untill everything is finalized. PS: Am I the only one noticing the bitchin job the splash art team have been doing? First warring kingdoms Vi, now this....
: ***
What was the point of the rework again? Cause I can't help but feel it didn't work...
: > [{quoted}](name=Mischief Maker,realm=EUW,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=i2nk4jNt,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2017-01-20T16:49:00.209+0000) > > by reading the media i would say that most americans don't like trump... so how he won the elections if everyone hates him? > logical question. You mean the pro-hillary media? Or do you mean the problem about polling where it's hard to get good results if the people you are asking are scared to tell the truth?
> [{quoted}](name=Linna Excel,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=i2nk4jNt,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2017-01-20T16:52:02.815+0000) > > You mean the pro-hillary media? > > Or do you mean the problem about polling where it's hard to get good results if the people you are asking are scared to tell the truth? Oh...i get it... You mean the very same media that called people racist misogynistic idiots for even considering voting for Hillary. And then they wonder why people would lie in polling. Geeze...let me think...
: When you sacrifice yourself for that ONE game deciding play
+1 for Mad Max Fury Road. Best. Movie. Ever.
Meddler (NA)
: It's safe to say we don't think Rift Herald's hitting the mark in its current form yeah. It's not really causing problems, but it's not offering much either alas. Suspect we're more likely to do work on RH before looking at possible alternate dragon types too. In terms of making it specifically a 'you didn't get dragons' benefit we tend to be pretty cautious about those sort of mechanics because they can lead to low interaction objective trade situations (they take A, we take B instead of contesting A). That can lead to dull games. Wouldn't be so bad in the version you propose given dragon's assumedly clearly better, especially as the game goes on. Would be inclined to start by looking at things that make RH really exciting in its own right when looking at it though, then look at fallback effects like that later if nothing that stands on its own more could be found.
I've always been curious about this and I apologize if you've touched on this before; but, why wasn't the Rift Harold's buff more of a team-orientated buff as opposed to an individual one. I figured it would have made it much more desirable.
Lùmen (EUNE)
: I just wanted a personalized shop. Is that too much to ask for? Tsk.
Same here. Tsk Tsk. I also wanted Legendary Snowball to return, I was ready for it too. Guess I'll just keep my money then. Thank Rito. Tsk Tsk Tsk
Zetto (NA)
: Yeah. This worked, congratulations. So does the "All the eggs in one Yi shaped basket" comp. Just because it does work, doesn't mean that it's good, nor does it mean that it isn't an actual pile of cancer. Just watch. A month or so in the future everyone is gonna figure out how to fuck the ziggs strat and then it's gonna get dropped faster then anyone can switch champs. Until then, I hope ziggs gets nerfed into the floor. This asshat and all the mid laners that decide to take a vacation to bot and then fuck over my games can all go rot next to urgot.
The funny thing is, the majority of top laners were saying the exact same stuff when ADCs were going top and ruining the mele-champs day; but know that people have discovered that mages work bot, ADCs can't yell & scream loud enough.
Ralanr (NA)
: Can the next marksman we get use throwing weapons instead of a gun/bow?
I came up with an idea a long time ago for a different ADC, but not too many were interested. I even made a post, only to find out Riot actually thought about something remarkably similar. An ADC version of Rumble. An ADC that uses heat as a resource/weapon just like Rumble does. If I remember my post correctly, my original thought was that they could dispense the heat through autos and either build heat passively or through abilities, I can't remember exactly.
Rioter Comments
: I think that would be a legitimate way for a MOBA to exist, but I'm not in favor of turning League into that. That kind of gets into my second point. If you hamstring an assassins ability to assassinate, it's not necessarily unbalanced. But it does really make assassins seem silly thematically, and it does change the way the game is played. It's not wrong to prefer the game balanced differently. Some people prefer Rugby to American football, and vice versa. I would be fine with a MOBA that didn't have so much damage. That's not a problem. But, personally, I would strongly prefer that those that want that make a new game. I like League the way it is, as do many others. If that's what other people want, let's have both. Let's not destroy Rugby just because we like American football. Both can exist.
I can understand that, in fact I might fully agree with you if given more thought. I think if you took all the damage out of League it would lose some of its magic. That being said, my dislike of assassins in the meta ( or any champ really that can 100-0 you in the blink of an eye) grows from the numerous times one of those champs killed me and I had no chance to respond (looking at you old Leblanc). Death with the feeling of helplessness, kinda ruins the game for me. While I can agree having assassins unable to assassinate feels wrong and doesn't fit within the idea of the game; however, being in the situation where I've just been deleted with no hope of counterplay makes me want things to change I'll use hockey instead, since I love it way more than football. Whenever I watch a hockey game and I see an enforcer lay a huge hit on a defensive player, I yell and celebrate cause its exciting and adds more to the game. If someone questioned why such things were allowed I'd say cause its just part of the game and if you don't like it that much, play something else. However, if I was that defensive player that just got hammered, I would be yelling and screaming "why the hell is he allowed to do that to me!" (I realize there are problems with this analogy, but the thought is there) I guess my thoughts on what this game should be are kinda different depending on if I'm in the game or here on the boards, and it's difficult to stick to one sometimes.
: I think you're wrong to think so, and here's why. Assassins. They have to be able to burst people when they play well, and if everyone's damage is lowered, there are only two possible outcomes: 1. Assassins can't burst people unless they are WAY ahead. 2. Assassins are OP I see only one alternative, and that's if you don't accept my premise. In other words, you don't think assassins need to burst people. This game has developed with that expectation though, and getting rid of it would be devastating in a way that none of the other big changes have been. They've made a lot of changes to this game over the years, but nothing THAT drastic. The class is still supposed to burst, regardless of what people say about the updates, etc. If you can convince me that assassins can still be bursty if all the damage is lowered, I might be able to get on board. But your method has another key problem. Namely, if base damages get lowered and scalings don't, then the game becomes even more snowball prone. Base damages protect against a fed enemy. If scalings become an even larger share of every champion's damage, then a fed champions is EVEN MORE POWERFUL compared to champs working on their bases. I don't think that's good for the game. I think we're pretty well balanced right now. There's a good argument for keeping it the way it is. High damage allows you to punish enemies swiftly for bad positioning and face-checking. It actually amplifies the strategy (not of teamfights, but of the macro game). If we reduced all damage, the macro game suffers in favor of champs that can teamfight well. If that's what you want, I suppose I understand why you want these changes. But say goodbye to the macro game of League as we know it. It would all change.
To your Assassin point: I believe assassins are a necessary evil in the present state the game is in. As long as I can one/ two shot a squishy as Draven (or other adc/mage), an assassin should be able to burst me down in the same. I've always felt that way. It's only fair. Now, if you lower all damage in the game, meaning I can no longer blow an enemy up, then the assassin doesn't have to blow me up in return. Right? Thats where I'm coming from. If you take away everyone's 100-0 ability and make it so that fights have to last longer, then there isn't a need for assassins to have that level of burst. Of course I'm a little biased since I've been asking for something similar for a long time now; but I hope that makes sense.
Ralanr (NA)
: Him and Sion are perfectly designed imo.
I agree with you there, Sion has become my favorite character by far. Absolutely love his lore. Still waiting for that Gladiator ( the movie) style skin I've been dying for. From a thematic perspective, I think Illaoi is damn near perfect too. Completely unique and everything fits together extremely well.
: Nope. Any champ with high waveclear=ez win. {{champion:103}} {{champion:136}} {{champion:1}} {{champion:268}} {{champion:63}} {{champion:105}} {{champion:74}} {{champion:420}} {{champion:55}} {{champion:61}} {{champion:68}} {{champion:13}} {{champion:27}} {{champion:15}} {{champion:163}} {{champion:17}} {{champion:18}} {{champion:4}} {{champion:110}} {{champion:45}} {{champion:161}} {{champion:112}} {{champion:8}} {{champion:101}} {{champion:157}} {{champion:26}} {{champion:115}} to name a few...
But how fast do any of them actually take a tower? What if you took victor and I took trist? Yeah you have the wave clear but I can go right through towers (relatively speaking of course). I suppose thats not enough to make it interesting...
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
CLG ear (NA)
: What Videogame did you play that you found was absolutely PERFECT: 10/10
Bioshock. An absolutely perfect game. It's on my list of top 5 games ever and I believe its one of the few 'must plays' that should be experienced at least once. Bordelands 2. Maybe a controversial one, but its perfect to me. I've put a ridiculous amount of time into it, solo at that, and I still love playing it. Also, some of the greatest dlc ever. Red Dead Redemption. I absolutely love this game, it does everything right. From the characters to the world, it all feels real and is one of the greatest worlds ever created. Dead Space. This one might not be perfect but its damn close and is a great example of how horror games should be. More suspense, less action. The others weren't as good, but also weren't bad. They did some really good things, but ultimately went more action orientated that the original.
: Enemy team picked Yasuo.
The problem with Yasuo is actually a problem with Riot. Riot created him to be the mele version of an ADC, so they gave him all this power and all these tools to deal with the range ADCs he would go against. However, when the experiment failed, they never took away any of the power or any of the tools they gave him. So now you have this champion with too much power and too many tools, being played against champions that weren't meant to go up against him in the first place. The only way I see to actually make Yasuo work without taking away a lot or reworking him, is to force him down to bot lane like other ADCs. Even then I'm not sure if that would make things better...
: Uh, no? Absolutely not. Unless the intention is to let the enemy team win, then I can't see the reason why it should be reportable. People having fun is a GOOD thing. I would not dick around in a ranked game, but in normals? For what reason other than to have fun would you play them? A winning team should rightfully be able to have fun. The losing team should really back up and consider why they lost hard enough that the enemy team feels they can freely do such a thing. And sure, maybe they had a troll or an AFK, but that happens to everybody and simply deciding every little thing needs to be banned is not a good solution. Some people like to play League to have fun, and since taunting does not actually do anything harmful, I do not see why it shouldn't be allowed.
Playing devil's advocate here....but can you imagine what its like for the other team? While you're having the time of your life going 46/ 5 as a team, they are going 5/46 and getting more & more miserable the longer the game goes. You guys messing around, delaying the end just makes things worse for them. Does their perspective not matter to you when you're in that situation? (genuine question) I've been there, on both teams, and I absolutely don't want to prolong the pain or have it prolonged...
: Uh.... in normals? In ranked, yeah, that's annoying because they're costing me a win but in norms? Who cares? If the whole team is having fun jerking around, why be an annoying little rain cloud and piss all over their fun because you're larping Eeyore? Spamming emotes in the fountain when it's a sure win can be considered griefing and is unsportsmanlike, but if you're talking about just dragging a game out to pad your score in norms, like, honestly, who _cares_?
What about the other team though? Yeah you're having fun, but they are hating life and this game, and the longer you decide to extend the game just makes it worse for them. I've been on both sides of this and reported them both times cause I know how it feels to be there and I absolutely hate it when it happens to me, so I don't want it to happen to anyone else.
Rundus1 (NA)
: Which Champion is the best designed?
I already gave my thoughts on who I think is the best designed (Sion), but I did want to give a shout out to who I think is in very close second... Illaoi Illaoi is a great example of what characters should be, an accumulation of her parts. From her back story, attitude, visuals, and abilities, every part of her add up to make one of the best characters. If I wasn't so biased toward Sion, I might actually place her ahead of him.... But I am... So... Sion wins...
Ralanr (NA)
: {{champion:14}} Everything in him screams this big motherfucker that you do not mess with. Plus the mixed lines of monstrous rage, insatiable bloodlust, and odd calm/mournful moments, make him feel rather realistic to me.
Sion is by far my absolute favorite character in this game and might even beat some characters outside mobas, in the like of John Marston, Tiny Tina, and Adam Jensen. I love everything about him, from his back story to how they tie it in to his original skin and how they actually convey that Sion is just a shadow of what he once was, but still should be feared and respected. Everything about him goes together and works together...and thats why he's the best designed champion.
Eyesack (NA)
: damage is still way too high.
First off I 100% agree, damage is WAY too high. It often leads to that: "what the fuck! Thats complete bullshit! How the hell am I supposed to do anything if I just get deleted in a fucking quarter second!!" feeling...Which completely takes away the fun of the game and when I get so frustrated at insta-delets or how my full tank build is being melted through, it ruins it for me. What I find interesting is how Heroes of the Storm does it. HOTS doesn't have items and it actually feels way better for it. I've never came across anything that just frustrated the hell out of me. It actually feels really fair and balanced and the games feel more fun as a result (generally speaking). Now HOTS does do other things that help the experience, like making it more of a team-reliant game by placing a huge emphasis on objectives that take multiple members and having an entire team level not individual levels like league. Now while I did find HOTS games to be more fun, I eventually came back 'cause I find the characters in league far more interesting. If you find damage to be almost game-ruining, I would definitely give Heroes of the Storm a shot.
: I wish I could reroll but America won't. So, I'm left with Hilary: a person already in an important position and failing. She's already proven she's a liar. She's already shown she has 0 regards for life and is willing to let people overseas die through pure negligence. She can't even keep track of important documents, lied about that too, is abusing a plethora of resources to manipulate every media source out there, even Google. Is using her vagina, and most her adds are about sexism. Then let's not forget that the only possible outcome of Hilary being in office is that things will just be the same, and worse off. Then you additionally wonder: she has every news source aside from a few republican ones wrapped around her finger. The president around her finger. Google around her finger. A sexist pull. A gender vote. A family name. Absurd political manipulation. And she's still struggling to beat an idiot? She can't even combat an "idiot" what possible benefit is she going to be in office? Especially when she "gets too hot" and goes into full seizure mode again? I see no benefit to her being in office. She's done enough to be fired from any other position. I find it additionally pathetic how someone can lie about everything they do during a criminal investigation and still be counted "credible". Go ahead and lie about what you do in court and see how well it works out for you as a nobody. On the other hand. trump. I already know what I'm getting. A very rich idiot that everyone hates. A loud mouth imbecile. But at least there's a 1% chance through all of his idiocy something beneficial might accidentally happen. There's 0% chance with Hilary. To round this all off. I'd rather burn in a fire with a 1% chance of that turning into changing my life for the better. Over knowing I'm just going to continue rotting as is, with the 100% acknowledgement that our entire government+news outlet is 100% controlled by an out dated old hah and we are living in a real life situation of a novel I read, and America is apparently okay with that. I'm not okay with that.
> [{quoted}](name=CaptnJakSparrow,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=X6g4dzcz,comment-id=0010,timestamp=2016-10-12T17:59:29.331+0000) > > I wish I could reroll but America won't. > > So, I'm left with > > Hilary: a person already in an important position and failing. She's already proven she's a liar. She's already shown she has 0 regards for life and is willing to let people overseas die through pure negligence. She can't even keep track of important documents, lied about that too, is abusing a plethora of resources to manipulate every media source out there, even Google. Is using her vagina, and most her adds are about sexism. Then let's not forget that the only possible outcome of Hilary being in office is that things will just be the same, and worse off. > > Then you additionally wonder: she has every news source aside from a few republican ones wrapped around her finger. The president around her finger. Google around her finger. A sexist pull. A gender vote. A family name. Absurd political manipulation. And she's still struggling to beat an idiot? She can't even combat an "idiot" what possible benefit is she going to be in office? Especially when she "gets too hot" and goes into full seizure mode again? > > I see no benefit to her being in office. She's done enough to be fired from any other position. I find it additionally pathetic how someone can lie about everything they do during a criminal investigation and still be counted "credible". Go ahead and lie about what you do in court and see how well it works out for you as a nobody. > > > On the other hand. trump. I already know what I'm getting. A very rich idiot that everyone hates. A loud mouth imbecile. But at least there's a 1% chance through all of his idiocy something beneficial might accidentally happen. There's 0% chance with Hilary. > > To round this all off. I'd rather burn in a fire with a 1% chance of that turning into changing my life for the better. > > Over knowing I'm just going to continue rotting as is, with the 100% acknowledgement that our entire government+news outlet is 100% controlled by an out dated old hah and we are living in a real life situation of a novel I read, and America is apparently okay with that. > > I'm not okay with that. This. This is damn close to how I feel. I hate both options, but these are the only ones realistically left. So, it's either a belligerent idiot or a lying, corrupted, and useless Politian. Hillary Clinton shouldn't even be allowed to run cause she'd be too busy in prison; but because she's utterly corrupt and has so many connections, she can get away with anything. Well, I say screw that...I refuse to let her off the hook, even if a huge part of this country did. In the end if I do vote for Trump, its not so much as a pro-Trump vote, as it is an anti-Clinton vote. I ABSOLUTELY refuse to vote for another useless & corrupt politician thats not going to get anything done and just sit a top the throne packing their pockets for another eight years. This is the year that I use my vote to send a message and not to support someone who I agree with. Unfortunately, these are the only two options. So I choose to use my vote to send a message that might actually get through.
: Name a skin line and a champ that would be redundant together
: Ziggz Q
What if they added the option to detonate the Q on reactivation ? (similar to his sachel charge) I feel like that could help him a TON. I also think that if they did introduce this option, they could also give him a bounce similar to mini-Gnar's hop on his Q. Just think of it...this new Q could bounce off the front line and either detonate at max range or upon reactivation. Sounds good to me anyway...
: Keep it fresh by different styles each year.
I get that, I guess i just find the zombie thing much more appealing thats all. They still look good though.
: It would be kinda boring if they did the same theme every year though
I get that but they made such a cool event out the zombie theme last year with the zombie movie posters and trailer. I'm interested in knowing if they'll do something similar with these somehow.
: Lil' Devil Teemo and Bewitching Trist Splash
Sooo.... Are these this years Halloween skins? If so...cant help but be a little disappointed. I loved the zombie theme of last year's and was kinda hoping that would continue. Although....that Teemo skin looks very cool...
Jikker (NA)
: Eve is OP in URF idk why you'd think you were doomed. And it's the League community. That's all the explanation you need. League community = new levels of toxic
> [{quoted}](name=Jikker,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=NWBzN1zG,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2016-09-25T10:51:50.567+0000) > > Eve is OP in URF idk why you'd think you were doomed. > > And it's the League community. That's all the explanation you need. League community = new levels of toxic I figured we were doomed because they had Kata, who I've seen 1v5 before in urf, and Morg, who has super long cc and on a short cooldown I figured it'd be constant.
Rioter Comments
Show more

HellsTrueKing

Level 30 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion