: > [{quoted}](name=I Willump You,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=FkmIl30g,comment-id=00020000000000010000,timestamp=2018-11-09T14:14:04.151+0000) > > 1 ) You're not showing us where the racist remark is or the conversation where it's posted. So you're expecting us to take your word on it. > 2 ) You're not showing us anything that links the two people together as friends. > 3 ) You're not showing any abuse of power. > > A lot of admins will not tolerate people questioning their decisions or causing a lot of ruckus over them. You can call it what you want but if it's their server, it's their rules. You can choose not to be on it. > > Look, I'm going to be honest with you about this : > > The fact that you're here, making this thread about it, and what's posted in the screenshots that you presented... > > Makes it look like you're just being a belligerent asshole and they punished you for it. > > Someone said something that offended you and he got sorta' pseudo-punished for it and now you've just allowed yourself to be completely enveloped in expecting him to burn at the stake instead of just going on about your day. > > If he's not reposting whatever remarks made you upset in the first place, you need to let it go and move on with your life. What I don't like is how they continue to allow it https://imgur.com/a/o8THX64 he knows the mods are protecting him **> 2 ) You're not showing us anything that links the two people together as friends.** it's not a secret and I'm not going to post the everyday long conversation of their friendship publicly on the server
> [{quoted}](name=Jinzaburo,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=FkmIl30g,comment-id=000200000000000100000000,timestamp=2018-11-09T14:29:04.776+0000) > > What I don't like is how they continue to allow it > > https://imgur.com/a/o8THX64 > > he knows the mods are protecting him > **> 2 ) You're not showing us anything that links the two people together as friends.** > it's not a secret and I'm not going to post the everyday long conversation of their friendship publicly on the server Viet is the racist term? Viet is short for Vietnamese, right? How's that racist? Explain it to me.
: > [{quoted}](name=Hethalean,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=FkmIl30g,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2018-11-09T13:37:08.358+0000) > > I too am having trouble finding the racist term OR the linked Wikipedia article describing it. This looks purely of a short conversation between you and the moderators. You also left out the comments that you were making. > > This whole thing feels suspiciously doctored. if you have any questions just ask me I want to get to the bottom of it too I want to know why they can protect their friend this way, and abuses their power
> [{quoted}](name=Jinzaburo,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=FkmIl30g,comment-id=0002000000000001,timestamp=2018-11-09T13:57:22.658+0000) > > if you have any questions just ask me I want to get to the bottom of it too > I want to know why they can protect their friend this way, and abuses their power 1 ) You're not showing us where the racist remark is or the conversation where it's posted. So you're expecting us to take your word on it. 2 ) You're not showing us anything that links the two people together as friends. 3 ) You're not showing any abuse of power. A lot of admins will not tolerate people questioning their decisions or causing a lot of ruckus over them. You can call it what you want but if it's their server, it's their rules. You can choose not to be on it. Look, I'm going to be honest with you about this : The fact that you're here, making this thread about it, and what's posted in the screenshots that you presented... Makes it look like you're just being a belligerent asshole and they punished you for it. Someone said something that offended you and he got sorta' pseudo-punished for it and now you've just allowed yourself to be completely enveloped in expecting him to burn at the stake instead of just going on about your day. If he's not reposting whatever remarks made you upset in the first place, you need to let it go and move on with your life.
: Unofficial Community Discord power abuse and racism
Are you leaving pictures out or am I not seeing the part where someone's being racist towards you(r) people?
Zethro (NA)
: Buying a monitor for gaming, one game being league
Get Shroud's monitor. It's only $420. I have an ACER Predator and I enjoy the 2k resolution and the higher refresh rate but that 240Hz on the BenQ sounds juicy for FPS's. I also like the way it looks.
: Riot Please
This happens a lot if you watch the Twitch streamer compilations videos on Youtube n' what not on a regular basis. Feelsbadman.
: my leauge client wont let me log in. keep getting a error code 003 every time i go to open lol up
: Is there any grounds to file a lawsuit against Riot...
League of Legends' client makes my keyboard go nuts. I'm not bullshitting you. I play dozens of games on my computer and I try new ones out all the time. This only happens when I'm playing this stupid fucking game but it'll start randomly locking keys on my keyboard so that I can't click on the map or use a certain number or it'll start opening menu's like a key is stuck. Once the game is over and we get into the post-game lobby, it'll clear up and let me type or do stuff again. Last game it would just spam 7 every time I opened the chat. It wouldn't let me alt-tab. It wouldn't let me open task manager. Wouldn't let me use the map. And for anyone who thinks it's because my 7 key actually gets stuck. I don't use 7 for anything in League of Legends. I never touched the key. It's always a random number or letter, never the same one.
: > [{quoted}](name=notFREEfood,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=h6AVXeQr,comment-id=000200050000000000000000000000010000000000000001,timestamp=2018-11-08T16:28:23.935+0000) > > The difference is that when you get asked to stop, you stop. > > And that&#x27;s the slippery slope fallacy. > > And it&#x27;s not the fucking jokes alone. It&#x27;s the jokes plus everything else that makes it hostile. > > It&#x27;s obvious that the fart joke complaint is lacking additional context that should come out in the trial, but you&#x27;re treating it like it&#x27;s this absurd claim that could never be harassment or contribute to a hostile workforce claim. > > Officially, my employer&#x27;s policies are stricter than legal standards. Some of the people I work with are massive clowns and are constantly joking around, but it&#x27;s not a problem because they respect everyone&#x27;s boundaries. If someone complains about a joke, you don&#x27;t tell it again (at least when that person is around). If someone continually complains about your jokes, then those complaints actually could be considered a form of harassment and you go to HR. _<Removed by Moderation>_ You have claims against people who made fart jokes being "hostile." While the people in the fucking dispute are calling others rapists.
> [{quoted}](name=notFREEfood,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=h6AVXeQr,comment-id=00020005000000000000000000000001000000000000000100000005,timestamp=2018-11-09T02:58:09.749+0000) > > It&#x27;s misogynistic even with context. Here&#x27;s a lawsuit with specific, concrete claims of discrimination and he has the nerve to imply that these women might have an ulterior motive. > > Specifically, what happened to Jessica Negron looks like textbook sexual discrimination. Assigned job duties that would merit a significantly higher salary without a requisite increase in pay - check. Had increased job duties handed off to a male then handed back when the male left - check. Never even given the chance to apply for the position in spite of positive feedback - check. Threatened with firing after making a HR complaint - check. > > In the two years she worked at Riot her pay went up by only 3,000. In the two years I have worked at my current job, I have seen a pay raise of $15k. Scaled down to her pay range, I still would have received a pay increase of over $11k. > > If I were in her shoes I&#x27;d be pissed. > > &quot;Light teasing,&quot; whatever that means, is strictly not capable of creating a hostile workplace. That means as long as your jokes stay within reasonable bounds you have nothing to fear. What's concrete about the claims? Aside from the fact that the women are making claims, where's the evidence to support any of it happened or that it happened the way that they claimed it happened or for the reasons they claimed it happened?
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Jamaree,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=h6AVXeQr,comment-id=00020005000000000000000000000001000000000000,timestamp=2018-11-08T06:48:31.985+0000) > > I honestly don&#x27;t think there is a place where people work where NO ONE makes crude and rude jokes of some kind. The difference is that when you get asked to stop, you stop. > Which is dumb in and of itself, because it starts here and fall too quickly will devolve into a situation of any and all jokes being seen as hostile. And that's the slippery slope fallacy. And it's not the fucking jokes alone. It's the jokes plus everything else that makes it hostile. It's obvious that the fart joke complaint is lacking additional context that should come out in the trial, but you're treating it like it's this absurd claim that could never be harassment or contribute to a hostile workforce claim. Officially, my employer's policies are stricter than legal standards. Some of the people I work with are massive clowns and are constantly joking around, but it's not a problem because they respect everyone's boundaries. If someone complains about a joke, you don't tell it again (at least when that person is around). If someone continually complains about your jokes, then those complaints actually could be considered a form of harassment and you go to HR.
> [{quoted}](name=notFREEfood,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=h6AVXeQr,comment-id=000200050000000000000000000000010000000000000001,timestamp=2018-11-08T16:28:23.935+0000) > > The difference is that when you get asked to stop, you stop. > > And that&#x27;s the slippery slope fallacy. > > And it&#x27;s not the fucking jokes alone. It&#x27;s the jokes plus everything else that makes it hostile. > > It&#x27;s obvious that the fart joke complaint is lacking additional context that should come out in the trial, but you&#x27;re treating it like it&#x27;s this absurd claim that could never be harassment or contribute to a hostile workforce claim. > > Officially, my employer&#x27;s policies are stricter than legal standards. Some of the people I work with are massive clowns and are constantly joking around, but it&#x27;s not a problem because they respect everyone&#x27;s boundaries. If someone complains about a joke, you don&#x27;t tell it again (at least when that person is around). If someone continually complains about your jokes, then those complaints actually could be considered a form of harassment and you go to HR. _<Removed by Moderation>_ You have claims against people who made fart jokes being "hostile." While the people in the fucking dispute are calling others rapists.
: Page 5 - "Gaming culture is the last remaining safe-haven for white teen boys"? Good grief. I'm sorry but I daresay these children can handle someone not exactly like them in their precious games. And they call us liberals snowflakes... Overall, how is it so fucking hard for people to see that finding these "jokes" offensive doesn't make you "easily triggered"? This stuff should not be happening in a workplace, period. Lists of people you'd sleep with? Genital pictures? No. Just no. Forget the guys will be guys excuse. If you can't go to work without acting like you're in high school, you shouldn't be employed. Simple.
> [{quoted}](name=PerchancetoGame,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=h6AVXeQr,comment-id=0045,timestamp=2018-11-08T13:46:29.676+0000) > > Page 5 - &quot;Gaming culture is the last remaining safe-haven for white teen boys&quot;? Good grief. I&#x27;m sorry but I daresay these children can handle someone not exactly like them in their precious games. And they call us liberals snowflakes... > > Overall, how is it so fucking hard for people to see that finding these &quot;jokes&quot; offensive doesn&#x27;t make you &quot;easily triggered&quot;? This stuff should not be happening in a workplace, period. Lists of people you&#x27;d sleep with? Genital pictures? No. Just no. Forget the guys will be guys excuse. If you can&#x27;t go to work without acting like you&#x27;re in high school, you shouldn&#x27;t be employed. Simple. _<Removed by Moderation>_ Who's more likely to say something as fucking retarded as "Gaming culture is the last remaining safe-haven for white teen boys?" The more or less normal slightly older than teen white guys who're gamers? Or the raging feminists who call absolutely everything that happens to them in their state of employment an act of sexism, hate the male patriarchy, and are pushing the same narratives as the angry mobs who hate white CIS males? Look at most of the fucking claims that they list in the document. Men talking over women in meetings. Their ideas are shunned while men's ideas are praised. They assert that they're adequately performing the roles that they are filling. What if they're not? Who're they using as a metric? THEMSELVES? They just ASSUME that everything happening to them that's negative is 100% sexism and not because... they're actually bad at their job or that their ideas suck. They're literally offended by men trying to make small talk with them about their family. I'm willing to put my neck on the line for Riot in this case even though I hate this company with a fucking passion because of their SJW cult-like behavior and they honestly deserve to eat themselves from the inside out. But there's no way that this isn't absolute horseshit. Sure, investigate, do your thing. We can't "know for sure." But I expect more than a fucking apology on Twitter from them when it turns out that they're just your standard weaponized vaginas with legs who have no moral compass playing the blame game in 2018 in an attempt to slander and crucify anyone that doesn't "do right" by them.
: Lawsuit Filed Against Riot Games
Shocker. Women in 2018 filing "rape" and "sexism" claims without any evidence. I didn't see that one coming. Can we not get some serious fucking consequences on these women? If you're raped, fine, good for you for filing. But this seems to be a growing pattern where women think they can just toss words like "rape" and "sexism" around like a bag of Pop Rocks and nobody should be upset when they're completely full of shit. If nobody's proven guilty of rape and the data doesn't prove that they were discriminated because of their sex. Lock the bitches up.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: We Love You C9
Good on FNC, I'm not spiteful towards them or the EU. But as a C9 fan, I can't watch all of World's this year and then watch those games last night and arrive at any conclusions other than the obvious : 1 ) The show and match-up's are scripted. 2 ) EU imports intentionally threw to an EU team in semi-finals. Call me a conspiracy theorist, call me crazy, call me reaching, etc... But I don't see how you can possibly think any different after seeing how bizarrely stupid they were playing last night. I've loved Jensen as a player for a very long time. Bjergsen and Jensen are the two reasons I even still watch League e-Sports because I refuse to play this shit game anymore and it pains me to accuse him of what I honestly believe him to be doing last night or to think he's of that moral character. Svenskaren literally walked it down top lane after being one of the key reasons C9 got ahead in all of the games leading up to FNC. Honest to god never thought I'd say this but Sneaky was the best player in all of those games and I hate Sneaky.
Rioter Comments
: Wouldn't work. Dlift and Jensen both have really big personalities and we already know Jensen is the reason Meteos left. Besides sneaky is still top tier.
> [{quoted}](name=MetaCosmos,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=l4ikpjwG,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-10-15T19:22:18.748+0000) > > Wouldn&#x27;t work. Dlift and Jensen both have really big personalities and we already know Jensen is the reason Meteos left. Besides sneaky is still top tier. I haven't seen a single game since World's started where Sneaky looked good. He's always fallen behind in his lanes despite all the help they throw his way and he's had almost no presence in team fights.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: So every E-Girl support main should be banned? Or what? Don't understand the point of this.
> [{quoted}](name=BurakkuRozu9,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=hNE5E24a,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-08-20T19:57:52.384+0000) > > So every E-Girl support main should be banned? Or what? Don&#x27;t understand the point of this. The point is that absolutely every single person that does this defaults to "I don't know how to play support," buys nothing but APC items, steals farm, pushes waves, doesn't ward, and chases kills all game and I'm getting really tired of the ONLY people in this community that get banned are the ones who get pissed off over everyone else INTENTIONALLY ruining your chances to win because they refuse to play anything other than a carry.
Rioter Comments

I Willump You

Level 16 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion