Krigjer (NA)
: Player told me 'kys' in postgame lobby.
Pre and post game chat is reviewed with rhe system. Should be fine if the report came after they said kys. You can fill our a tidket if you think it would ease your mind. Remember you don't always get notified when someone is punished.
: I have a post suggesting that the chat ban drops only 2 levels for 10 game, and 3 for 25 game. So from honor 5 to honor 3, or honor 4 to honor 2.... For exactly the reason of "hey, this behavior isnt good. You might want to stop before you lose out on even more things"
That makes it potentially worse in the early season though since we get bopped sown to Honor 2. Both would knock from 2 down to 0.
: if a 14 day ban is for the word f u c k then this game is f u c king s h i t
It is not for fuck. Fuck is 4 letters and not auto censored by the boards.
Puckısh (NA)
: The Tyler1 extension is garbage
Or maybe they think a 1 time extension is fair because previously if you had served a chat restrict before a certain period, you got the rewards. First full year for system, compromise after end date so people don't procrastinate.
: Remember when HB offered bundles of Assassin's Creed or Star Wars or Saint's Row games? Now it's all garbage-quality books, old versions of second-rate software, Early Access shovelware, and near-hentai shovelware. Pepperidge Farm remembers.
> [{quoted}](name=KFCeytron,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=VIr7E4LW,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-11-15T23:36:03.888+0000) > > Remember when HB offered bundles of Assassin's Creed or Star Wars or Saint's Row games? Now it's all garbage-quality books, old versions of second-rate software, Early Access shovelware, and near-hentai shovelware. > > Pepperidge Farm remembers. Occasionally they get something neat out in a bundle. That and I do enjoy the how to make cosplay stuff and Tabletop game Book bundles
: Yeah but Sins sucks, so.
> [{quoted}](name=ChickenWrap,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=VIr7E4LW,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-11-15T23:06:42.470+0000) > > Yeah but Sins sucks, so. Free is free. So people can try for themselves. ^.^
Rioter Comments
: What do you mean not everyone can use pings everyone has amouse as far as I know with the amount of things you can ping nowadays everyone can ping anything
I didn't think I had to include the term effectively whilr I said it. Yes, everyone can "use" pings; but not everyone can "use" pings effectively. Then you consider not everyone can understand the meaning behind pings. If I play jungle, I can ping gromp, blue, river, and then on my way to mid. You may understand that I'm saying gronp, blue, and gank from river; but somebody else may think that is me being nearby and going in too early. Basically, sifferent skill levels.
: > [{quoted}](name=Imperial Pandaa,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=9J0ekNeG,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-11-15T16:39:00.349+0000) > > You had a prior 2 week ban before your perm, and we don't know where this other player is in their punishment tiers. Perhaps they are at the chat restriction levels still. > > As for private messages, you opted in by adding a player you knew was toxic. chat restriction has nothing to do with this. The things he said were toxic enough for me to get perma banned and he flamed twice as hard and didn't even go off with a chat restrict cuz i would get instant feedback report. Also the chat restrict doesn't have to be first before a ban. If you flame as hard as he did you would get banned for 14days or permaban if u already had a prev ban. But he got noting.
Actually, it has a lot to do with the situation. The tier list for punishments is usually as follows: 10 game chat restrict 25 game chat restrict 14 day ban Perm ban There are some instances that get immediate escalation to the next punishment tier or skips multiple. If this player did not break any of those and had only a prior 10 game chat restrict, then they may have gotten a 25 game chat restrict for the game with you. Yes, chat restricts have to come first for verbal punishments at this point. After a 14 day ban, you can do something worth a chat restriction and get a perm instead. It works off consistency x severity. As for DM, that is up in the air for punishment and we aren't 100% because it is an opt in function. If it is really bad, then maybe.
: Comparing my ban vs a player i played with recently
You had a prior 2 week ban before your perm, and we don't know where this other player is in their punishment tiers. Perhaps they are at the chat restriction levels still. As for private messages, you opted in by adding a player you knew was toxic.
: 2v5 ranked
Are ypu willing to gain only 4 or 5 lp when you win matches that this happens to the enemy?
: Please add a "disable all chat"
Not everyone can use pings. Some can use chat responsible and for fun. A symbol that shows someone blocked you could lead to worse behavior in game. Just mute in game in you don't want to see people chat. Post game you can skip stats.
: 14 day ban for 1 game?
There are a few factors that could contribute to this ban. 9k gold not spent. Multiple deaths on the opponents side of the map past towers. Including one near the Nexus. 2 minutes played after selling basically all your items.
rujitra (NA)
: League is for fun
Here is the thing though, everyone has fun in their own way. Playing their hardest anf winning is fun for some. Trying out wacky things is fun for another. They don't always mix though.
: Banned for Anger/Aggression at People who don't take the game seriously
Competition doesn't mean you get to be an ass to people. Even in regular sports, there are limits to what can be said without fine or penalty.
: You are not 22_35. You don't act like it. And no one here tolerates your disrespect.v
The 22-35 was him answering the age range of millenials since he was complaining about them.
: around 22-35 y/o which is large majority of the player base and leadership holders in the community that are weak minded with no back bone that break at the thought of a naughty word.
So wait, people who report are weakminded? What does that make the people who insult or display toxic behaviors? No minded? Considering most of these people "flaming" wouldn't say the same things to the persons face, maybe they are the weak minded ones with no back bone?
: Riot and their pathetic banning system
Slurs escalate to a 14 day ban, so this is effectively your warning. I am curious if you know the age range of millenials and that you may actually fall into that range. Maybe your definition of toxic is skewed?
: Perhaps we should let people post with the keyboard?
Know what I rather have first? An autosave function for when typing a post. It is heartbreaking to click in the wrong spot or see a page auto refresh and you lose everything you typed.
: Why cant men be sluts?
They can be. Society usually labels them "studs" though.
: ehh i dont leave games. i dont think ive left a game in more than a year on this account.
Real life time doesn't affect in game time. Take break for 1 year and come back to play 1 game. Game is 20 minutes. Congrats, it had been 20 minutes since your last afk/leaving instance.
PaniczBoski (EUNE)
: How can I not tilt?
That isn't adc Veigar, that is Veigar bot lane. You act as if mages in the bottom lane weren't a thing earlier in the season.
Kei143 (NA)
: Ya .. but those are positive words used in a negative context. Which really isn't "saying positives" alone.
I agree completely. However, if that person had created their own post (was someone trying to hijack; but did find it) and posted the logs. We probably would have been confused and assumed they were edited.
: do you have a link where someone is punished for only saying positive things? I'd love to see it
There was a case for passive aggressive where the player kept saying "gj" everytime an ally died. Yes passive aggressive, but debatably also "positive"
: Goodbye League
Granted I cannot prove my next claim, I feel it is accurate. I think the reroll for champ shards were removed due to abusing assholes like me. Fact of the matter was, once you had all champs below 4800, you could abuse the reroll system to get more expensive champs cheaper. Random champ shards are/were 1600 a pop; 4800 for 3. So people would eventually spend 4800 for a champ instead of whatever value above that, made worse by people also doing it for new champs.
: Post active hours for Boards Discord
Making an estimated wait time thing wouldn't really be the most practical thing though. Since it is purely a volunteer moderation. There will be times that unavailability will just happen to overlap. Making available hours means some mods will have to make sure they are available during such; pretty much making it feel like a job at that point. Sonwhile it might need some improvement, hours available and wait time may not be the avenues to look at.
: > [{quoted}](name=Imperial Pandaa,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=GtIbVWI0,comment-id=0002000000000000000100000000,timestamp=2018-11-10T17:20:32.719+0000) > > Ypu know what else can be consider the "greater good" argument? Limiting a player's right to ban a champ because the player hovering thinks it is better for everyone else if they have it. Equally as wrong. > > It doesn't infringe on anyone's right to play? Damn then why have bans period? The enemy may really want that Blitzcrank I always ban if I play support. In fact, they may be hovering it and I have no idea. Instead, I should have to dodge and take a penalty when said champ is picked when there is a tool available so don't have to worry about the enemy possibly getting it at all. > > There is no morale high ground. You say if they want to play a champ that I don't want the enemy to get, I should dodge. Guess what? That works the other way to. If a champ you want to play got banned, then you can dodge as well. It is a game with a specific order of events. > > Intent hover (or leave blank; which means I still ban the OP FOTM) > Ban phase. > Pick phase. > > Ban takes priority of pick, it isn't a matter of one persons choice being more important than the other. It is just a matter of one getting the action sooner. All I'm going to say is that one day, someone is going to ban your hover because they think it's for the better. I just hope I don't see a post out of you titled "****** bans my pick because ****** thinks he knows better" in the future. cheers.
You act as if I have never had my hovered picks banned. Well, I have and you know what happened? I shrugged, accepted it happened, and picked one of my back ups. It is called being flexible and adapting; something that I wish was more common in the community. And before try using the flexible and adapting against, yes, it can be used on your side of the pick/ban argument. Just as many of yours for picks can be used for bans.
: > [{quoted}](name=Imperial Pandaa,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=GtIbVWI0,comment-id=00020000000000000001,timestamp=2018-11-10T16:30:32.523+0000) > > In the case for my example, I do not want to play against my ban. > > BAN > PICK > > Hovering doesn't even guarantee that the hover is going to be picked. > > There is plenty of common ground, but being limited to an island is no good. If someone wants to ban anothers hovered champ SOLELY to troll them; then sure, put it as a strike to punish. However, if there is a tactical reason to ban because say OP FOTM or New Release (as balance is usually fucked or little/no experience) then I feel it is fine. Again, this falls under the "for the greater good" argument. Limiting another player's right to play a champ base on the assertion that its better for everyone else. This is fundamentally wrong. When you see a player playing a freshly minted champ in ranked, and you don't feel comfortable about it you can always dodge. That is within your right, and it does not infringe anybody else's' right to play. Obviously, you struggle to do that, because by doing so you would lose LP. So it's better to infringe other's right to play. Where is the moral high ground here? Are we that far?
Ypu know what else can be consider the "greater good" argument? Limiting a player's right to ban a champ because the player hovering thinks it is better for everyone else if they have it. Equally as wrong. It doesn't infringe on anyone's right to play? Damn then why have bans period? The enemy may really want that Blitzcrank I always ban if I play support. In fact, they may be hovering it and I have no idea. Instead, I should have to dodge and take a penalty when said champ is picked when there is a tool available so don't have to worry about the enemy possibly getting it at all. There is no morale high ground. You say if they want to play a champ that I don't want the enemy to get, I should dodge. Guess what? That works the other way to. If a champ you want to play got banned, then you can dodge as well. It is a game with a specific order of events. Intent hover (or leave blank; which means I still ban the OP FOTM) Ban phase. Pick phase. Ban takes priority of pick, it isn't a matter of one persons choice being more important than the other. It is just a matter of one getting the action sooner.
: > [{quoted}](name=Imperial Pandaa,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=GtIbVWI0,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2018-11-10T15:21:01.245+0000) > > Do I know for certain they (enemy) are going to pick the OP FOTM? No, but I also don't know for certain they will not pick it. Note that I specifically mention OP FOTM (over powered, flavour of the month) for my ban. I'm not going to ban the Yasuo or Riven just because you hover them (unless op fotm). I'm not going to ban Udyr from the jungle just because I don't like him. > > The narcissim jab goes both ways. Your pick isn't any more important than my ban. Erm it is more important than your ban because you don't want to play your ban. PICK > BAN. If we can't agree on that we have no common ground to work on. This will go no where.
In the case for my example, I do not want to play against my ban. BAN > PICK Hovering doesn't even guarantee that the hover is going to be picked. There is plenty of common ground, but being limited to an island is no good. If someone wants to ban anothers hovered champ SOLELY to troll them; then sure, put it as a strike to punish. However, if there is a tactical reason to ban because say OP FOTM or New Release (as balance is usually fucked or little/no experience) then I feel it is fine.
: > [{quoted}](name=Imperial Pandaa,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=GtIbVWI0,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-11-10T13:27:34.643+0000) > > Yes, because unless we have first pick and can secure whatever the OP FOTM champ is, or secure 2 OP FOTM champs in exchange; I will ban something hovered. And since we don't have LCS style banning, not gonna risk the 2 for 1. Same excuses over and over. Fortune tellers that makes decisions on the future they predicted. You pick this champ therefore that is gonna happen so I'm going to ban you because I know better. Wow and I'm narcissistic.
Do I know for certain they (enemy) are going to pick the OP FOTM? No, but I also don't know for certain they will not pick it. Note that I specifically mention OP FOTM (over powered, flavour of the month) for my ban. I'm not going to ban the Yasuo or Riven just because you hover them (unless op fotm). I'm not going to ban Udyr from the jungle just because I don't like him. The narcissim jab goes both ways. Your pick isn't any more important than my ban.
: Lets settle this
Yes, because unless we have first pick and can secure whatever the OP FOTM champ is, or secure 2 OP FOTM champs in exchange; I will ban something hovered. And since we don't have LCS style banning, not gonna risk the 2 for 1.
Dr Dog (NA)
: chat is fine as it is, you can get away with a lot of shit but i do think they need to enforce their 0 tolerance words much much much better, quoting someone shouldnt get you banned and legitimate breaking of the rule should result in a instant 14 day like they say it does but in reality it just doesnt
Why does someone need to quote it? How would you propose the system detect/handle that? If it is in quotes then ignore it? Maybe if someone said it first? Neither of those work as well as one would hope. If you have an example of a case when someone used ZT, was reported, and didn't get a 14 day ban; please share.
Kei143 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Ecophile,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=A0P4AI2x,comment-id=000600000000,timestamp=2018-11-09T16:18:30.665+0000) > > wait longer for true toxic players to be flagged on a prolonged period of time But ... that IS how the system works right now. We probably are talking about two different concepts and are failing to understand each other. Either that or our definitions don't match, thus we will misunderstand each other. Btw, the bot can understand context of the words used within a phrase. Look at all those writing correction programs out there. The bot uses those modules as a base and is paired with a learning machine to further understand the purpose and meaning behind our words.
Seems Ecophile wants more focus on gameplay as opposed to chat. While they agree that certain words shouldn't be used, they see less issue with verbal toxicity as opposed to gameplay toxicity. Course, there is a chance I am misunderstanding.
: Tantram post from like January admitting you have to show reformed behavior (positive use of chat) and that muting all on a "dirty" account will vastly slow your progress. Really Riot does not want reform though. They want people who have been chat restricted to leave the game. Lyte / Tantram / Tantram's replacement when the community gets pissed off at behavior again would implement permabans for first offense if they were allowed to.
Now you are contradicting. Slow progress is not the same as no progress.
: > [{quoted}](name=Ice Weasel X,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=4NewJiK5,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-11-09T19:26:34.225+0000) > > Also: > > ...which confirms that it can be done, but also that doing so may result in a waste of time/money since Riot may strip your rewards anyway. Another Red I asked on that Discord explicitly said there will be no repercussions. Then again I would not put it past Tantram to "fix" this exploit by permanently barring your account from your home region due to it containing a skin which would be considered contraband. This season has shown us that he clearly shares Lyte's sadistic enthusiasm for hurting people and that he was just pretending to be different. Then again Tantram is also the guy that removed warnings from the game due to budget concerns so maybe we've known who he really was for a long time. Also wouldn't be the first time we have been explicitly lied to about Honor 2.0. Riot explicitly gave advice of "don't use chat at all if you think you might relapse" but as it turns out you don't gain any honor muting all every game unless your account is already above H2 / "clean." In fact it wouldn't surprise me if "/muteall" immediately disqualifies you for that match.
> [{quoted}](name=Hi Im Danksley,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=4NewJiK5,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2018-11-09T19:43:00.660+0000) > > Also wouldn't be the first time we have been explicitly lied to about Honor 2.0. Riot explicitly gave advice of "don't use chat at all if you think you might relapse" but as it turns out you don't gain any honor muting all every game unless your account is already above H2 / "clean." Source?
: How we as a community can help to improve the current punishment system
I want to look at the punishments and this is just a general spitball. Add warnings back. Before a 10 game chat restrict, you get a warning and it comes with a reform card which remains until honor unlock. Punishment attached is 1-2 checkpoints (plips) knocked from honor progress and honor lock. A Second 2 Week for ZT cases only. Dropping ZT is never a necessity in a game, and I understand why it gets escalated to a 14 day ban. I do understand the issue with immediately going ro the edge (as a 14 day does) and then a small slip for a perm. So my thought is if a punishment after a 14 day (for ZT) would be a CR then a 2nd 14 day ban instead. Coding might be difficult so just making a second 14 day for all might be simpler. At a 14 day a ZT = perm. I would rather take the warning than the 2nd 14 day tbh if only one could be considered.
: so riot set my account to honor level 0, but I didn't get a notifaction or an Email?
: > Affordable =/= realistic is rather pessimistic isn't it? If you do something you make it a reality, whether or not others had an opinion on it. Like Flight. Or Space Exploration. Or Heart Transplants. Or the Railway. Or the Freeway. Or Computers. Or Phones as strong as computers. But we're not talking about flight, space exploration, heart transplants, railways, freeways, computers, or smartphones. We're talking about getting a metric fuckton of people specifically trained to handle millions upon millions of reports _daily_ that require them to watch countless hours of gameplay to try and find infractions. I'd rather be considered pessimistic for evaluating a proposal honestly than suffer the drawbacks of idealistic optimism. > How specially trained do you have to be to see someone run down lane 10 times in a row and stand inches infront of the enemy turret and die as many times and see them say "sorry guys i'm lagging, i'm not usually this bad" to understand what is really going on? Running down lanes and standing just inside turret range aren't the only forms of trolling and intentionally feeding. There are cases of feeders with subtlety, and trolling can be anywhere from using your Champion's kit to fuck up your teammates (Tahm _Devour_, Anivia wall, Trundle pillar, etc.) to following someone and stealing CS/draining XP. You can't just point to the most obvious examples and say "well, how specially trained do you need to be for this?" when there's a whole _world_ of misbehavior beyond that. Beyond that, anyone who'd apply to manually review trolling/feeding cases would have to: 1. Understand the game at at least a considerable level, within the range of Silver-Gold at minimum 2. Have the patience to watch game after game after game, whose lengths can range anywhere from 15-40 minutes, all focused on one player per game 3. Understand intentionally feeding and trolling to such a degree that they can identify more subtle methods of misbehavior 4. Have the ability to reliably discern intent (which is pretty fuckin' hard BTW) 5. Be able to remain completely unbiased and avoid false-positive punishments (off-meta/unusual builds cannot be punished) And those are just the requirements I could think of right off-hand. And again, you need upwards of _ten **thousand** people_ who fit this bill. So, I reiterate; you can't look at the most obvious offenses and expect that to be the minimum requirement. That's scraping at the bottom of the barrel. If we want to tackle feeders and trolls, we have to tackle _all of them_, not just the most obvious of them.
I jist want to contribute another form that only realized after about 2 or 3 watches of a player from the boards. A player was hit with a int (griefing) ban and came to boards. Watched the match and there wasn't too much out of the ordinary. Some questionable stuff, but that could be chalked to poor judgement. Near the end of the 2nd watch I realized I didn't see the player ult (as Jinx). So I watched it a third time to confirm that. I watched at 2x speed too.
Longcląw (EUW)
: Rioter's behavior towards players
Mentioned they were having server issues. Informs that the name is offensive as per; >v. Transmitting or communicating any content which, in the sole and exclusive discretion of Riot Games, is deemed offensive, including language that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, sexually explicit, or racially, ethically, or otherwise objectionable; Or >xi. Selecting a Summoner name that is falsely indicative of an association with Riot Games, contains personally identifying information, or that is offensive, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, sexually explicit, racially, ethnically, or otherwise objectionable. You may not use a misspelling or an alternative spelling to circumvent this restriction on Summoner name choices. Riot Games may modify any name which,** in the sole and exclusive judgment of Riot Games, violates this provision, without notification to you, and may take further disciplinary measures, including account termination for repeated violations;** Asks if would like to return to the original matter after issuing the punishment for name change.
: but why did riot remove that line from their faq and why does the support also not mention it? heres the quote from faq > HOW ARE WE PUNISHING MMR BOOSTING? > Any account found participating in MMR Boosting (both Booster and Boostee) are subject to the following punishments: > > 2 Week Account Suspension in League of Legends > Your Honor will drop to level 0. Honor unlocks some time after your penalty as long as you're showing signs of progress > Exclusion from receiving the current season's Ranked Rewards > Second time offenders will be permanently banned from League of Legends clearly says only current so im curioes if they changed their policy about that
I think it is the timing. Say you were getring boosted these last few days/ week. The punishment might come after the new season starts. Technically you were punished for last season mmr boosting, so they go back and take the rewards for the season you boosted in.
Masynia (NA)
: You just said I'm smoking drugs... Lol.
I repeat. >They may strike the part that implies you do drugs. And. >I'm not defending myself here. I know the difference between defending and retaliation.
Bultz (NA)
: Asols ult should deff knock back champion like sion in his ult.
Because their ults are considered "unstoppable". If you change that then a lot of other things need changed.
Masynia (NA)
: Lol do you not realize that you can get banned if i reported you for what you just said. You negatively responded to me. You definitely deserve a suspension. (exactly what i'm saying, system is broken if you defend yourself)
Report me then. The button is below my response in the bottom right corner. Hopefully you realize there is a difference between game chat and forum etiquette. In this case, they may strike the part that implies you do drugs as that toes the line. You weren't defending yourself in chat, and quite hoenstly, I'm not defending myself here.
: > [{quoted}](name=The Djinn,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=b7fKavGw,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2018-11-07T16:12:34.477+0000) > > Because a player's behavior can change fairly rapidly. If I started harassing people in my games, I'd get banned swiftly, despite 8 years of previous good behavior. That past experience doesn't prevent me from being punished if I start misbehaving now. > > They don't. 1 report has just as much power as 9: all either does is make the system look at that game for problematic behavior. Does this include even if they are reported for different reasons? Say one for griefing, one for afking, one for, iunno, hate speech? I don't have the list of reportable offences memorized.. 😅
To an extent. All 3 examples you gave are different systems. So it would flag the player in that game for each one reported. That is why you can report up to 3 categories though. When you consider people asking for reports, they are trying to get them to report for a specific thing.
: > [{quoted}](name=APX Athora,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=9QqeeciE,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2018-11-07T07:36:14.008+0000) > > Take your cookie and leave. :) You're a Morgana ADC type of person, I can tell. Yeah sure because that makes sense
Well yeah, cause science. Eh? Eh? See what I did there? I'll see myself out.
: this deserves a 14 day suspension?
Are there other games in the reform card and did you edit anything out?
zipora (NA)
: Banned After One Game
Summoner spells: Cleanse and Smite Champion: Soraka Starting Items: Boots health pot and refillable pot. Second buy: Jungle Equipment and Swifties. Third Buy: Combining Jungle Items. So an intentional feeding ban isn't just intentional feeding. It also covers Griefing, and trolling. Which it seems like would be the more likely reason. You can appeal with a support ticket, but I highly doubt they would reverse this.
: Riot, I need answers.
Here is an answer. Math. If you correspond each letter to a number (the old a=1 b=2) then the letters add up to 42.
: > [{quoted}](name=Imperial Pandaa,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=0YG5pL5V,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-11-07T06:33:00.499+0000) > > To clear confusion, did you mean H1 3/3? Edited: Honor 1 3/3
Awesome. I would like to thibk you are like 20 games away so long as not saying anything negative.
: How far away am I from Honor Rank 2?
> [{quoted}](name=Danny DeVïto,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=0YG5pL5V,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-11-07T06:26:17.681+0000) > > I have played over 80 games since I have been honor rank 2 3/3 which was October 29th. So as you can see I have been on quite the grind recently, To clear confusion, did you mean H1 3/3?
Show more

Imperial Pandaa

Level 107 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion