: Almost every hypercarry has a good early. Kai is not special.
> [{quoted}](name=Lucas Fehrwight,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Igy4ZaUP,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-09-15T05:39:59.612+0000) > > Almost every hypercarry has a good early. Kai is not special. {{champion:30}} {{champion:96}} {{champion:67}} {{champion:69}} {{champion:24}} {{champion:13}} {{champion:45}}{{champion:8}} {{champion:268}}arguably Yeah I see ur point, maybe its just a structural thing in the game that late game champions are able to do extremely well early on because of busted mechanics or reliable high damage. Idk, still strikes me as a problem that Riot should address because it still feels like garbage to play against most of these champions.
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Jeanne fan club,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=vAN8uVNh,comment-id=000e0000000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-13T14:57:32.358+0000) > > so the counterplay to a late game hypercarry is hugging ur support so that they cant abuse their busted early game? Nice. Somewhere in that cute retort your gears did not rotate hard enough to consider that her early game is not busted when you're next to your support or minions...
> [{quoted}](name=Crescent Dusk,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=vAN8uVNh,comment-id=000e00000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-14T09:22:26.179+0000) > > Somewhere in that cute retort your gears did not rotate hard enough to consider that her early game is not busted when you're next to your support or minions... a late game hypercarry shouldn't be able to kill people in 1 rotation in the early game, and get a vayne ult on a basic ability in the late game lol. Idk why you are so defensive on this overloaded abomination of a botlane assassin that converts to a kog/vayne hybrid in the late game that can itemize in 20 different ways including fking ZHONYAS, but w.e, all I know is that she is pretty much pick or ban in diamond elo.
: > [{quoted}](name=Jeanne fan club,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=vAN8uVNh,comment-id=000e00000000,timestamp=2019-09-13T02:27:57.598+0000) > > its really easy actually, if you step just a tiny bit away from your minion wave you can get isolated q'ed. like, if you walk in front if it to poke or pressure, or you accidentally get shoved through by minion block. It isn't difficult at all to get isolated q, and to be fair, if there is only the melee minions in front of you it still chunks like crazy. That's just one element of her burst too so idk man. Its not at all comparable to kha q, you have to stand far away from your minion wave. for kai its dependent on her range relative to the wave and where you are positioned in it. Just don't do it. You should be hugging your support in a kaisa lane. It's obvious counterplay. Kaisa is really abusable in her early game.
> [{quoted}](name=Crescent Dusk,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=vAN8uVNh,comment-id=000e000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-13T03:13:25.907+0000) > > Just don't do it. You should be hugging your support in a kaisa lane. It's obvious counterplay. Kaisa is really abusable in her early game. so the counterplay to a late game hypercarry is hugging ur support so that they cant abuse their busted early game? Nice.
: > [{quoted}](name=Jeanne fan club,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=vAN8uVNh,comment-id=000e,timestamp=2019-09-13T00:53:28.904+0000) > > getting bursted for 400 damage lvl 1 by a kai q auto is one of the most interactive and enjoyable parts of the video game for me. Oh, and getting instagibbed by a jax who built items that give both flat damage, cooldown reduction and hp on top of his ults base stat steroid, oh BABY thats what I live for. You have to be straight out r%%%%%ed to be isolated at lv1 against her and away from minions or your support. Almost as stupid as sidelaning alone as an adc with a khazix in the game.
> [{quoted}](name=Crescent Dusk,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=vAN8uVNh,comment-id=000e0000,timestamp=2019-09-13T01:36:54.762+0000) > > You have to be straight out r%%%%%ed to be isolated at lv1 against her and away from minions or your support. Almost as stupid as sidelaning alone as an adc with a khazix in the game. its really easy actually, if you step just a tiny bit away from your minion wave you can get isolated q'ed. like, if you walk in front if it to poke or pressure, or you accidentally get shoved through by minion block. It isn't difficult at all to get isolated q, and to be fair, if there is only the melee minions in front of you it still chunks like crazy. That's just one element of her burst too so idk man. Its not at all comparable to kha q, you have to stand far away from your minion wave. for kai its dependent on her range relative to the wave and where you are positioned in it.
Remus Wins (EUNE)
: Kai'Sa New Legendary Unit & Huge Void Nerf in TFT
Well at least in TFT they admit she is an assassin
: Kaisa is not an ADC, Pyke is not a support, and Jax is not a fighter
getting bursted for 400 damage lvl 1 by a kai q auto is one of the most interactive and enjoyable parts of the video game for me. Oh, and getting instagibbed by a jax who built items that give both flat damage, cooldown reduction and hp on top of his ults base stat steroid, oh BABY thats what I live for.
Tsuko (NA)
: I'd love to see someone try to defend on how "First timing champions in ranked is perfectly fine".
I don't think first timing actually matters. Back in season early 5 when I started, I took viktor to ranked without playing him in normals and went 34-15ish wins/losses. Hell, this season with shyvana im like 6-3 already and I've never played her in norms. I mean honestly, most of the game is determined by ur teammates anyway so I think its a little wierd to be blaming the entire game on viktor alone. He was vs sylas after all, and sylas is very strong. Not to mention jarvan was paired with sylas, which is pretty much an instant one shot the second they go in. Kind of hard to just farm vs sylas, even if ur under turret.
Riftn00b (EUNE)
: I fail to see what trade-offs Jax has now
CLG ear (NA)
: Do you think Bjergsen will leave TSM
U made this post to bait me in didn't you? Idk I think that he is the kind of building block that defines tsm, like hes the base of the team. He's been playing since LCS started right? maybe he will just retire or something.
Hvsao (NA)
: They already announced that they might use alternative skins for champions to give them different origins and abilities. Nightbringer Yasuo might be a Demon + Swordsmen + use his dash instead. Or something like that.
> [{quoted}](name=Hvsao,realm=NA,application-id=RaE1aOE7,discussion-id=ZGjZiduj,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-09-05T20:02:19.807+0000) > > They already announced that they might use alternative skins for champions to give them different origins and abilities. > > Nightbringer Yasuo might be a Demon + Swordsmen + use his dash instead. Or something like that. ah, I didn't know that thanks for telling me
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: MAJOR BUG for all Stuns and Roots OCCURRING EVERY GAME!
I've only had this happen 1 game where I was playing morgana and everytime i landed a q they would step out of my pool while rooted. was annoying, everyone else in the game already knew about the bug.
Remus Wins (EUNE)
: STAR GUARDIAN ZOE, XAYAH, RAKAN, NEEKO & Prestige Neeko
I dislike all of these champions except for rakan unfortunatly. Xayah feels like the illaoi of botlane, zoe feels like the illaoi of midlane, i dont have too strong a feeling about neeko but she feels extremely unfun to play against. I mean I guess its ok that xayah and rakan get a skin, but it feels kinda wierd to be giving neeko and zoe a skin, and only 4 skins really? I feel like quinn has such a good setup for an sg skin.
Raiyza (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Jeanne fan club,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6ZPzI6f6,comment-id=000800000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-25T23:24:49.745+0000) > > I live in a place where the government provides water and electricity, and we pay SIGNIFICANTLY less for both of those things than if we were to go through a private corporation. > Good for you. Sometimes corporate business is cheaper. Lots of people have the choice of what they would like to pay for. That's the entire point of healthy competition. If the gov were to take over that too, thats called a monopoly which is illegal. > Whats so bad about the government installing solar panels on houses lol? the increase in taxes necessary is cheaper than installing them yourself. > No, it isn't cheaper. I'd very much pay for solar panels myself with a one time payment than have money taken out of my check every two weeks for a few years. > Also, the government has complete control over law enforcement in our country, does that mean the police is communist? or how about fire stations, is the fire department communist? or how about any government agency without a private equivalent, is that communist? idk communism they way you are describing it seems pretty decent. Government agencies are usually non-profit so all of their income is dedicated to purely service, and wages, without the profit motive they tend to provide better service at a lower cost, just like how municipal isps are always better than comcast, charter, time warner, verizon etc. > That's different and you know it. Public services are different because as you say, they are non-profit. If the Gov were to take over energy sources completely, they would have to go for profits in order to research for more innovations. Not to mention paying at least 15$ an hour...which would make prices for consumers skyrocket. > Oh, a lot of these changes can be done if we tax the rich more. corporations in America don't pay taxes in America a lot of the time. And where did you hear this? Corporations paid 35% quarterly, and thats not including taxes paid on stock sales and such. Now it's 20% which allows expansion and job creation. Also, if you tax the rich more, the rich will leave. Would you rather have them pay the current whopping 37% of their income in taxes, or tax them more and watch them go live in another country where they won't pay a cent to the U.S? Why are left-wings trying to punish the rich for earning their money? Jeff bezos created thousands and thousands of jobs and created something extremely convenient. Why shouldn't he deserve his money? Same with bill gates. Btw they both donate to charity. > > You keep saying debt as if its a bad thing, for individuals it may be but debt for a country isn't the same thing as debt for an individual, its a completely different dynamic. It is a bad thing. If you ask me, we're lucky we are still getting any money in loans. Our word of repayment will value less and less as it goes on.
> [{quoted}](name=Raiyza,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6ZPzI6f6,comment-id=0008000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-26T14:55:22.847+0000) > > Good for you. Sometimes corporate business is cheaper. Lots of people have the choice of what they would like to pay for. That's the entire point of healthy competition. If the gov were to take over that too, thats called a monopoly which is illegal. > Whats so bad about the government installing solar panels on houses lol? the increase in taxes necessary is cheaper than installing them yourself. > > No, it isn't cheaper. I'd very much pay for solar panels myself with a one time payment than have money taken out of my check every two weeks for a few years. > Also, the government has complete control over law enforcement in our country, does that mean the police is communist? or how about fire stations, is the fire department communist? or how about any government agency without a private equivalent, is that communist? idk communism they way you are describing it seems pretty decent. Government agencies are usually non-profit so all of their income is dedicated to purely service, and wages, without the profit motive they tend to provide better service at a lower cost, just like how municipal isps are always better than comcast, charter, time warner, verizon etc. > > That's different and you know it. Public services are different because as you say, they are non-profit. If the Gov were to take over energy sources completely, they would have to go for profits in order to research for more innovations. Not to mention paying at least 15$ an hour...which would make prices for consumers skyrocket. > > And where did you hear this? Corporations paid 35% quarterly, and thats not including taxes paid on stock sales and such. Now it's 20% which allows expansion and job creation. > > Also, if you tax the rich more, the rich will leave. Would you rather have them pay the current whopping 37% of their income in taxes, or tax them more and watch them go live in another country where they won't pay a cent to the U.S? Why are left-wings trying to punish the rich for earning their money? Jeff bezos created thousands and thousands of jobs and created something extremely convenient. Why shouldn't he deserve his money? Same with bill gates. Btw they both donate to charity. > > It is a bad thing. If you ask me, we're lucky we are still getting any money in loans. Our word of repayment will value less and less as it goes on. Ok, well idk where tf you live but I'm not sure you have ever had to pick between a public utility and a private corporation. All I have to do is point to municipal broadband vs private corporation. Private health insurance vs public options offered by both the government and my state government. Yeah, public non-profits are definitely different that private corporations, that's why I think they are better at providing certain services that private corporations fail to deliver on (internet, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, water and electricity). Ur talk about taxes is kind of cringe, I feel like you just looked up corporate tax rates without understanding why they are such a big deal. The big problem with them is that many corporations pay 0$ because they move certain assets of their company into countries with a 0% tax rate. This means they are basing their companies in the US, but they aren't paying anything in taxes. Usually they set up parts of their company in the Caribbean, Ireland, or the Netherlands, and put their manufacturing plants in Singapore, Vietnam or other eastern countries. This results in cheaper manufacturing, and thus cheaper prices usually but that is a completely different conversation and I don't think that cheaper prices is a justification to let them get away with paying 0$ in taxes. I don't care that they pay into charity, I think that taxes are more important, and through government more effective social programs can fill the role of charity. Ur wrong about lowering the corporate tax rate, the government took in even less in revenue (thus increasing this debt thing you care so much about) and most of the profits went directly to stock buybacks. Not R and D, not raising wages, not innovation, just to paying back investors. Hell, that's the reason those Boeing planes are so fked right now, the ceo didn't want to invest in creating a new plane to hold a new engine that airbus made cuz he wanted to pay his shareholders back. the rich earned their money? bro this isn't the hill you want to die on. the walton family hasn't done a single thing in their life, they just inherited their money from their father and are now the richest family in the world. Bezos created thousands of jobs... have you seen the working conditions of these companies? Jeff Bezos hasn't done jack shit other than employ people and pay them a fraction of the wealth they generate for his company. Don't use this meritocracy argument because its really dumb considering all of the confounding factors in the world that people have no control over. Like, if i get lucky in the stock market and cash in a million dollars, do I deserve the money more than someone who works 70 hours a week? absolutely not. I'm not saying that the person who works 70 hours a week deserves a million dollars but we should live in a country where he/she can be financially stable working the standard 40 hours a week. Again, you don't understand national debt so I'm not gonna bother engaging with you on that. And overall, raising the minimum wage doesn't usually raise prices. Small increases to the minimum wage keep prices where they are, meaning that there is some wage inefficiency within the market, meaning that employers aren't paying their employees a proper wage. Now in sates like Wisconsin where the minimum wage is 7.25, maybe 15 is too high to jump to initially, a better plan would be to raise it to 15 over a number of years but I don't think you are ready to have that kind of conversation. The rich will leave is such a dead argument. Did they leave during the Regan era where we had a marginal tax rate of 90%? no they didn't, they stayed in america. Debate over, stop necroing the same old talking points we have been hearing for years now. oh and your premise is wrong with that statement, they don't pay taxes anyway.
Raiyza (NA)
: You missed my point completely. Investing is fine. Thats not what I meant. In fact, subsidies and such are one of the reasons why we are in so much debt, but it is necessary sometimes. The Green New Deal calls for the ban of fossil fuels. 100% clean energy sources over 10 years. Sounds fine on paper, but this also calls for the government installing energy equipment in every home in the country, including training. Complete government control over energy. Yes, that is communism. My main point though, is that in order for all of this to happen, it must be paid for. Who pays for it all? Taxpayers. Taxes will go up, and thats not good. Some people will be fine with it, but not most of America. I certainly won't. Not because I'm greedy, but because I can't afford higher taxes. It sucks. I know. If I was making 70grand a year, I would gladly hand over money to help out. Its the same fight over tuition for all. You just can't pay for it.
> [{quoted}](name=Raiyza,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6ZPzI6f6,comment-id=00080000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-25T22:16:23.545+0000) > > You missed my point completely. > > Investing is fine. Thats not what I meant. In fact, subsidies and such are one of the reasons why we are in so much debt, but it is necessary sometimes. > > The Green New Deal calls for the ban of fossil fuels. 100% clean energy sources over 10 years. Sounds fine on paper, but this also calls for the government installing energy equipment in every home in the country, including training. Complete government control over energy. Yes, that is communism. > > My main point though, is that in order for all of this to happen, it must be paid for. Who pays for it all? Taxpayers. Taxes will go up, and thats not good. Some people will be fine with it, but not most of America. I certainly won't. Not because I'm greedy, but because I can't afford higher taxes. > > It sucks. I know. If I was making 70grand a year, I would gladly hand over money to help out. > > Its the same fight over tuition for all. You just can't pay for it. I live in a place where the government provides water and electricity, and we pay SIGNIFICANTLY less for both of those things than if we were to go through a private corporation. Whats so bad about the government installing solar panels on houses lol? the increase in taxes necessary is cheaper than installing them yourself. Also, the government has complete control over law enforcement in our country, does that mean the police is communist? or how about fire stations, is the fire department communist? or how about any government agency without a private equivalent, is that communist? idk communism they way you are describing it seems pretty decent. Government agencies are usually non-profit so all of their income is dedicated to purely service, and wages, without the profit motive they tend to provide better service at a lower cost, just like how municipal isps are always better than comcast, charter, time warner, verizon etc. Oh, a lot of these changes can be done if we tax the rich more. corporations in America don't pay taxes in America a lot of the time. Perhaps we go back to the regan era where we had a 90% marginal tax rate, that should be able to pay for a big part of it. Not to mention that the government can issue out bonds for extra money, then pay it back with interest at a later date. LIke i said, japans debt is 3x more than their gdp, and they have had no repercussions whatsoever. You keep saying debt as if its a bad thing, for individuals it may be but debt for a country isn't the same thing as debt for an individual, its a completely different dynamic.
: How can you guys still play ranked and not go insane ?
Your premise is incorrect, you are assuming that we aren't insane
Raiyza (NA)
: You're certainly not wrong, AOC jr. But heres the issue. You can't just throw the government into everyone's lives like that. That's called communism. It has to happen naturally. Companies must innovate to move "green" and eventually, for example, everyone will be driving electric cars. Doing this by force through the government, will make life miserable. Then you rely on the government. You will have less freedom. We have already started phasing out gasoline, thanks to Tesla (and others). The government cannot do this forcefully like "The Green New Deal". I'm sorry, but noone can just dive into it like that. The US is already in too much debt, and the only way to do this is to massively increase taxes. Most of the countey cannot afford increased taxes.
> [{quoted}](name=Raiyza,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6ZPzI6f6,comment-id=000800000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-25T21:06:14.793+0000) > > You're certainly not wrong, AOC jr. > > But heres the issue. > > You can't just throw the government into everyone's lives like that. That's called communism. It has to happen naturally. Companies must innovate to move "green" and eventually, for example, everyone will be driving electric cars. > > Doing this by force through the government, will make life miserable. Then you rely on the government. You will have less freedom. We have already started phasing out gasoline, thanks to Tesla (and others). The government cannot do this forcefully like "The Green New Deal". I'm sorry, but noone can just dive into it like that. > > The US is already in too much debt, and the only way to do this is to massively increase taxes. Most of the countey cannot afford increased taxes. ... japans national debt is 3x their gdp but they are fine. This Austrian model of monetary theory has been proven false time and time again so this debt fear thing is overblown. Dude, I don't know if you understand this or not, but almost every big innovation in recent history was invested in by the government. Silicon valley is a good example of this. The green new deal wasn't even a policy, it was a resolution that congress would start investigating different ways they could pass legislation to reduce carbon emissions and invest in green energies. IDK what you mean by "throw the government into peoples lives" but pretty much every single safety regulation is the result of government interfering in peoples lives. Lead wallpaper? government fixed that. FDA preventing companies from putting harmful contents into food and other products, government did that. Police, fire departments, roads, highways, infrastructure, housing projects, fuel efficiency standards, government did all that too. Government is an important part of life and instead of trying to kick it out of our lives we should be utilizing it to make positive change. I'll just disregard your whole communism spiel because its woefully uninformed and presents a 1 dimensional view of government. I don't know what you mean by happen naturally either, we are on a ticking clock right now and waiting for elon musk to don his superman costume and snap his fingers to solve worldwide problems aint gonna happen. Also tesla receives a lot of government subsidies, not to mention electric car owners receive a rebate from the federal government in order to encourage the swap to electric cars. Is that communism too or?...
: I'm curious. As a Science believer how many Genders are there? How many Sex's are there?
> [{quoted}](name=Romans VI XXIII,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6ZPzI6f6,comment-id=000800010000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-25T20:38:20.342+0000) > > I'm curious. As a Science believer how many Genders are there? How many Sex's are there? you have no sense of irony do you?, you def watch ben shapiro xd. sex is biologically determined by a combination of different factors, gender is how we perceive ourselves through sex. Gender is often put into a context of societal expectations of male and female so it can mean very different things depending on which culture or society is in context. From what I understand gender is bimodal with most people identifying as male and female, but there are people who exhibit a preference for characteristics of the opposite gender of their sex resulting in them occupying somewhere in between male and female. Regardless of ones gender identity its important to teat people equally so this whole conversation doesn't even matter, I love the pivot though, you have nothing to say about ANYTHING when it comes to climate change so you change topics to something you remember all the talking points to xd. This is such a pointless conversation to be having you are out of your depth friend. I'm ending this conversation now, you have nothing important to contribute
: The first thing you need to under stand is that the climate CHANGES. It has in the past and it will in the future, with or without humans. > the right wing Brazilian government has allowed farmers to burn the thing to the ground, thereby exacerbating climate change OH? and what do those farmers plant? Rocks? No they plant PLANTS lol. Also the Right are not the Science Deniers, we just like facts. And ALOT of the "science" that is claimed behind "global warming" is made by biased scientists.
> [{quoted}](name=Romans VI XXIII,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6ZPzI6f6,comment-id=0008000100000000,timestamp=2019-08-25T19:46:31.507+0000) > > The first thing you need to under stand is that the climate CHANGES. It has in the past and it will in the future, with or without humans. > > OH? and what do those farmers plant? Rocks? No they plant PLANTS lol. > > Also the Right are not the Science Deniers, we just like facts. And ALOT of the "science" that is claimed behind "global warming" is made by biased scientists. sure, the climate changes, that's not the debate we are having right now. The debate is on how long we have until carbon in the atmosphere traps enough heat to make crops unable to grow, wildlife unable to live, and areas previously housing billions of people uninhabitable due to droughts or sea level rise. ..................... they burn down the forest so their cattle have more room to graze........... not plant plants. Uhh, no, if you think there are facts that oppose climate change then ur not on the team. Please don't use this "liberal bias" argument against science, it makes you look REALLY bad. Maybe if the most educated of us say something is wrong, our first response shouldn't be to run to sean hanity and look for whatever "scientist" ( all of the ones who deny climate change have financial ties to oil companies, are not climate scientists ((usually engineers)), or have previously supported tobacco companies by claiming that smoking doesn't cause lung cancer) will misinterpret studies as a pr stunt to make their companies look better. It is utterly UNDENIABLE that climate change is happening. The only times scientists have been uncertain about something with climate change is when it ends up being much worse than they previously thought. IDK how you can possibly think in 2019 that scientists are banded together in this broad conspiracy to increase their funding for... research? Scientists don't just pocket research grants dude. No, no, don't ever say the right uses facts again please. Cut the ben shapiro, unsubscribe from steven crowder. ditch jordan peterson. god forbid that you fall down the rabbit hole into the ethno-nationalist community. You should do actual research on the issue of climate change before you use talking points like that https://climate.nasa.gov/ here this will help^
JuiceBoxP (EUNE)
: Does anyone actually get enough orange essence to redeem skins?
I feel like the amount of orange you get for disenchanting has been reduced over the months, idk if thats actually the case but I remember being able to redeem more skins from buying boxes than buying them outright.
Fuya (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Lari,realm=EUNE,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6ZPzI6f6,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2019-08-24T16:02:15.221+0000) > > instead of buying skins to collect money why dont you take part in suck organization, you could help by your self there is always manpower needed in these cases. Also if you have a backyard go plat a tree there to help the planet :). Don't expect others to solve the problems for you Maybe just... idk... DON'T CUT THE FUCKING RAINFOREST DOWN? Don't expect ME to try to help improve something that CORRUPT CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PLANNING TO STOP ANYTIME SOON EITHER.
> [{quoted}](name=Fuya,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6ZPzI6f6,comment-id=00060001,timestamp=2019-08-24T20:12:58.328+0000) > > Maybe just... idk... DON'T CUT THE FUCKING RAINFOREST DOWN? > > Don't expect ME to try to help improve something that CORRUPT CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PLANNING TO STOP ANYTIME SOON EITHER. you can always vote my dude, even if you don't live in those countries you can vote for leaders who will hold them accountable. Not once has any crisis been solved by making small immeasurable changes that only serve to inconvenience yourself as an individual. Only through large systematic change will we fix the problems of today.
Raiyza (NA)
: And what would you have the world do? Cut millions of jobs? Kill thousands of businesses? Also, Ethiopia just planted 350million trees.
> [{quoted}](name=Raiyza,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6ZPzI6f6,comment-id=0008000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-25T11:57:23.388+0000) > > And what would you have the world do? Cut millions of jobs? Kill thousands of businesses? > > Also, Ethiopia just planted 350million trees. ur exaggerating, but ABSOLUTELY. There are plenty of jobs that will be created by green energy initiatives, not to mention that infrastructure spending will result in new jobs 100% of the time, and they can't be outsourced. If we can save our planet by cutting millions of existing jobs, and replacing them with infrastructure or green energy jobs, that's a pretty good compromise. Maybe giving people financial stability through government programs would be necessary in order to make the swap easier, but sitting here idly and hand wringing over lost jobs while we are living in a pressure cooker is unhelpful and irresponsible. And its cool that Ethiopia is planting trees, but that shows that only through government intervention can we solve this problem. We need a massive change on a global level to curb carbon emissions and the only way we are gonna do that is by switching to green energy.
: % of C02 Emissions Globally 1. China - 27.2% 2. USA - 14.6% 3. India - 6.8% 4. Russia - 4.7% 5. Japan - 3.3% 6. Germany - 2.2% 7 - 15 are > 2% Rest of World - 27.7% Clearly its "Right-Wing" Corporations fault lol. BTW those "Right-Wing" Corporations have created ways to REMOVER C02 from the atmosphere. https://www.climeworks.com/co2-removal/ But why remove it when the left-wing nuts can use "climate change" to control the uneducated.
> [{quoted}](name=Romans VI XXIII,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6ZPzI6f6,comment-id=00080001,timestamp=2019-08-25T16:43:02.648+0000) > > % of C02 Emissions Globally > > 1. China - 27.2% > 2. USA - 14.6% > 3. India - 6.8% > 4. Russia - 4.7% > 5. Japan - 3.3% > 6. Germany - 2.2% > 7 - 15 are > 2% > Rest of World - 27.7% > > Clearly its "Right-Wing" Corporations fault lol. > > BTW those "Right-Wing" Corporations have created ways to REMOVER C02 from the atmosphere. > > https://www.climeworks.com/co2-removal/ > > But why remove it when the left-wing nuts can use "climate change" to control the uneducated. https://b8f65cb373b1b7b15feb-c70d8ead6ced550b4d987d7c03fcdd1d.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com/cms/reports/documents/000/002/327/original/Carbon-Majors-Report-2017.pdf?1499691240 the link isn't working, this is the name of the report (The Carbon Majors Database CDP Carbon Majors Report 2017) I said governments that give favorable deals to corporations by removing regulations. Also you missed the point entirely idk how you managed to do that. The amazon rain forest is responsible for producing an immense amount of oxygen and in-taking a massive amount of carbon, the right wing Brazilian government has allowed farmers to burn the thing to the ground, thereby exacerbating climate change. rollbacks on environmental regulations, subsidies to gas and oil companies, electing a climate change denier as the leader of the free world, yeah there are a lot of right wing changes being made and its really screwing the world over in the long term. That climeworks company is aiming to curb just 1% of climate emissions so gj I guess? idk doesn't seem like private enterprise is fixing the issue so maybe we can't just ignore it and pretend its not happening. also, roughly 25% of its funding is from the Swiss government so its not like private corporations are spearheading fighting climate change alone lol, the only way a crisis like this will be combated is through massive government intervention on a worldwide scale. Idk what point ur trying to make but I really want this planet to be habitable 20 years down the road.
Raiyza (NA)
: Lol, pro corporate has little to do with climate change. The only way to combat climate change is to change our way of life, but nobody, and I mean *nobody* is about to stop driving cars.
> [{quoted}](name=Raiyza,realm=NA,application-id=A8FQeEA8,discussion-id=6ZPzI6f6,comment-id=00080000,timestamp=2019-08-25T00:24:26.549+0000) > > Lol, pro corporate has little to do with climate change. > > The only way to combat climate change is to change our way of life, but nobody, and I mean *nobody* is about to stop driving cars. corporations produce 70% of carbon emissions. The bolsonaro government has made it legal for farmers to burn down large swaths of the amazon rain forest for their cattle to graze. Amazon produces a lof of oxygen (therefore it also absorbs a lot of carbon).
: Save the planet
as long as right-wing pro corporate governments exist in the world there will be no fixing climate change. I'd still support this initiative, but it is really only a matter of corporate virtue signaling. An international entity will have to hold the Brazilian government accountable if we ever want to stop the amazon from burning, and that's just step 1 to combating climate change at this point. Its set back after setback at this point. I guess the world really is gonna be cremated alongside david koch
: so jungle Nasus AFK farmed his jungle all game and his team lost cause 4v5's are hard. What were we talking about again?
> [{quoted}](name=1wolfpack,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=32oUaJhe,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-08-22T16:43:56.134+0000) > > so jungle Nasus AFK farmed his jungle all game and his team lost cause 4v5's are hard. > > What were we talking about again? I mean he was a ~500 stack nasus, I was playing yuumi, he could literally 1 shot me with 1 single q at that point, he would kill anyone else on our team in 2-3 q's. Was kind of crazy. If he didn't have bad teammates that game would have been impossible
: > [{quoted}](name=Jeanne fan club,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=32oUaJhe,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-08-22T16:27:40.213+0000) > > not really, he got that all from farming jg camps So in 15 minuted, assuming he clears perfectly and gets every single camp in his jungle and killing all the camps with his Q, he will take: Lerge monsters: 4 Krugs/grown/large wolf/ Raptor 16 x 12 is 192 stacks 3 of each buff camp: 6 x 12 is 72 stacks We at 264 so far Small monsters: 8 wolves x 3 = 24 20 Raptors x 3 = 60 36 krugs x 3 = 104 15 mins of clearing gives 451 stacks. So you are telling me this names god managed to perfrctly clear his jungle despite all your efforts and still managed to pick up another 50 stacks from somewhere? And his teamanahed to 4v5 for those 15 mins but you still won?
> [{quoted}](name=Cind3rkick,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=32oUaJhe,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-22T17:11:13.874+0000) > > So in 15 minuted, assuming he clears perfectly and gets every single camp in his jungle and killing all the camps with his Q, he will take: > > Lerge monsters: > 4 Krugs/grown/large wolf/ Raptor > > 16 x 12 is 192 stacks > > 3 of each buff camp: > > 6 x 12 is 72 stacks > > We at 264 so far > > Small monsters: > 8 wolves x 3 = 24 > 20 Raptors x 3 = 60 > 36 krugs x 3 = 104 > > 15 mins of clearing gives 451 stacks. So you are telling me this names god managed to perfrctly clear his jungle despite all your efforts and still managed to pick up another 50 stacks from somewhere? > > And his teamanahed to 4v5 for those 15 mins but you still won? ah yeah, I rounded up a bit, it was probably around 460 at 15 minutes about. Yeah we won.
: Your jungler should have either invaded or hard ganked while he was afk farming.
> [{quoted}](name=Linna Excel,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=32oUaJhe,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-08-22T17:28:29.620+0000) > > Your jungler should have either invaded or hard ganked while he was afk farming. he was playing zac, and he was ganking.
: If he has 500 at 15 mins you have done something seriously wrong...
> [{quoted}](name=Cind3rkick,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=32oUaJhe,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-08-22T16:26:14.256+0000) > > If he has 500 at 15 mins you have done something seriously wrong... not really, he got that all from farming jg camps
: > [{quoted}](name=Jeanne fan club,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Edag23gP,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2019-08-21T22:34:38.626+0000) > > I mean you can certainly come back and try it, it doesn't hurt anyone. Id recommend playing valkyria chronicles 4 if you are looking for other game suggestions i watched the trailers for it and it looks like a mix between Xinoblade and Battlefield. an odd mix yes but it looks good.
> [{quoted}](name=Inkling Commando,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Edag23gP,comment-id=00060000,timestamp=2019-08-21T22:42:25.493+0000) > > i watched the trailers for it and it looks like a mix between Xinoblade and Battlefield. an odd mix yes but it looks good. im not sure what either of those are but its kind of like xcom where everyone is on perma overwatch, you can move ur characters more than 1 time per round, and it's anime.
Rioter Comments
: Daily LoL Fact #3: If you are American, you have freedom of speech in game and can say anything
: should i return to league?
I mean you can certainly come back and try it, it doesn't hurt anyone. Id recommend playing valkyria chronicles 4 if you are looking for other game suggestions
Bazerka (NA)
: Lunch break w/ Baz
whats ur favorite fate character?
CLG ear (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Jeanne fan club,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=JPkm7oto,comment-id=001a,timestamp=2019-08-19T19:19:04.677+0000) > > thats a nice meme, probably never been 100-0 at lvl 5 by her e q w q combo with ignite https://i.imgur.com/QWwdKP3.jpg[]
> [{quoted}](name=CLG ear,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=JPkm7oto,comment-id=001a0000,timestamp=2019-08-19T19:24:04.311+0000) > > https://i.imgur.com/QWwdKP3.jpg[] ah yes, a man of culture
Ahri Baka (EUNE)
: Opinion : Be it popular or unpopular about Qiyana
thats a nice meme, probably never been 100-0 at lvl 5 by her e q w q combo with ignite
Rioter Comments
enshine (NA)
: how fuckin low is the average vision score?
It can be borderline impossible to get vision down in extreme pressure lanes where if you step out from under ur turret you die.
Rioter Comments
Yääto (NA)
: I have officially failed my plat 2 promos 10 times
back in season 6 I failed plat 2 promos 38 times so yeah shit game my dude
Rioter Comments
Sublíme (NA)
: Swain re-rework is so bad...
IDK what lane ur playing him in but he is so much better as a bot laner now that he can q poke though minion waves, and his waveclear overall is so much better. I do agree that the stacks need to be buffed to like ~7 hp per fragment cuz I find myself only getting about 60 (300hp) per game which is extremely lackluster considering that assassins like {{champion:84}} {{champion:51}} {{champion:122}} {{champion:131}} {{champion:28}} {{champion:105}} {{champion:120}} {{champion:420}} {{champion:39}} {{champion:24}} {{champion:145}} {{champion:38}} {{champion:55}} {{champion:121}} {{champion:7}} {{champion:236}} {{champion:99}} {{champion:75}} {{champion:518}} {{champion:555}} {{champion:58}} {{champion:58}} {{champion:58}} {{champion:58}} {{champion:92}} {{champion:13}} {{champion:134}} {{champion:91}} {{champion:254}} {{champion:45}} {{champion:8}} {{champion:19}} {{champion:238}} will all 1 shot you instantaneously as soon as you get within their line of sight. Overall I find the rework to be nice, I dont see the damage decrease you are talking about. I just think that 5 hp per soul fragment is just a bit too little. But I only play him bot so maybe im missing something
: People troll my games because I pick Vel'koz support.
Bro, I still play mage botlaners in diamond and about 30% of my games are just people flat inting because of my pick. The other 70% of games where people are actually trying to win I almost always win
: Things I felt Nexus blitz got right
I liked the feel of casually qing up for a gamemode I didn't have to take too seriously and building whatever I wanted on a champ I felt like playing. It was nice not having to be on edge
CLG ear (NA)
: why hasn't sona been cured of her aphonia?
maybe she just doesn't want to talk to people and its been a big ruse this whole time
Teh Song (NA)
: first of all don't forget that your mmr and your rank are different things, so if you somehow managed to drop to Iron mmr and maintaining a challenger rank, you'd be a challenger who gets match with irons (extreme example but the point stands). Secondly you are not being forced on streaks of either kind. You win some, your mmr rises above your skill level, you lost till it drops back down. You lose some, your mmr drops below your skill level, you win till it goes back up.
> [{quoted}](name=Teh Song,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=IJPNTj6H,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-07-09T06:23:37.711+0000) > > first of all don't forget that your mmr and your rank are different things, so if you somehow managed to drop to Iron mmr and maintaining a challenger rank, you'd be a challenger who gets match with irons (extreme example but the point stands). > > Secondly you are not being forced on streaks of either kind. > You win some, your mmr rises above your skill level, you lost till it drops back down. > You lose some, your mmr drops below your skill level, you win till it goes back up. then climbing should look organic, not 15 win streak into 15 loss streak
Rioter Comments
: Ahri always tries to Q champions out of range
one thing I noticed is that at max range q, it wont apply q damage despite items like ludens and morrelo procing.
Show more

Jeanne fan club

Level 342 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion