AZ Frost (NA)
: Never said nerf, but "adjust". Imagine if kat{{champion:55}} could toss her Q every .25 secs..o_O..
> [{quoted}](name=AZ Frost,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=cjmuUc88,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-12-15T17:59:11.157+0000) > > Never said nerf, but "adjust". Imagine if kat{{champion:55}} could toss her Q every .25 secs..o_O.. If she could, that would be OP, because she's not designed around that. For that matter, Yasuo can't Q every 0.25 seconds, either; the minimum CD is 1.33s after he gets 111.11% bonus attack speed (it starts at 4s). This is like saying that Corki is OP because "imagine if Lux could ult every 0.25 seconds." Also, the things you are describing _would_ be nerfs, even though the euphemism you used was "adjustments." This is nothing but a rant, and as such it belongs on [RANT](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/rant).
Reya8888 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=KFCeytron,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=iNBpWO0o,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-12-14T05:26:16.657+0000) > > If you know this behavior is a problem: > > Why would you engage in it yourself? > > You argue a lot. Criticism along the lines of "the fuck?" is not constructive, telling people to stop crying is harassment, calling for reports is harassment. Most of what you said had no other purpose than venting; it wasn't useful, positive, or even neutral. You may have been permabanned on this smurf, but at least you still have that D3 account, on which you are behaving yourself with no punishments, right? This is my main account.. and I didn't ask for reports, they were begging to report me, flaming me, flaming other teamates. I'm only going to tolerate so much bullshit being spammed at me. If THIS is the threshold for permanent bans, how is half the player base not banned?
> [{quoted}](name=Reya8888,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=iNBpWO0o,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-12-15T01:17:17.991+0000) > > This is my main account.. and I didn't ask for reports, they were begging to report me, flaming me, flaming other teamates. I'm only going to tolerate so much bullshit being spammed at me. If THIS is the threshold for permanent bans, how is half the player base not banned? If it's your main, why did you say this: > [{quoted}](name=Reya8888,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=iNBpWO0o,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-12-14T05:16:43.147+0000) > > Reya8888: yea new to silver > Reya8888: im a d3 smurf If you weren't asking for reports, then what was the point of announcing your intent to report? > [{quoted}](name=Reya8888,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=iNBpWO0o,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-12-14T05:16:43.147+0000) > > Reya8888: muted, reported Your teammates' behavior doesn't factor into your ban. Refusal to "tolerate bullshit" is just a euphemism for not following rules. Unfortunately for you, the rules still apply to you whether you want them to or not. If you are unable to control your behavior - harassment, unconstructive chat, negativity, argument, bickering, blaming, posturing, etc. - then learn to deal with the consequences, which include a punishment. After several prior punishments, Riot realized your behavior was unlikely to ever meet their standards. The vast majority of the playerbase is not banned because we are able to recognize and avoid negative chat.
Kythers (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=KFCeytron,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=1Ia0sYcx,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-12-14T23:41:55.300+0000) > > Did you know that the Boards preview is resized and highly compressed, and you can click through to see the original? https://streamable.com/15if9 compare
> [{quoted}](name=Kythers,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=1Ia0sYcx,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2019-12-14T23:59:06.293+0000) > > https://streamable.com/15if9 > > compare I turned mine into a gif (with reduced resolution and FPS for smaller file size) so that it would autoplay, which a video does not. Also, a Highlight from my primary machine wouldn't be as good as yours anyway, as I'm getting some frame skips in 3D rendering due to not having done a clean OS install in too long. It's a hassle.
Kythers (NA)
: did you know the league client has a built in feature that lets you record footage in high quality, compressed WEBM format instead of this absolutely eye-destroying gif compression?
> [{quoted}](name=Kythers,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=1Ia0sYcx,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-12-14T23:03:51.791+0000) > > did you know the league client has a built in feature that lets you record footage in high quality, compressed WEBM format instead of this absolutely eye-destroying gif compression? Did you know that the Boards preview is resized and highly compressed, and you can click through to see the original?
: > [{quoted}](name=KFCeytron,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=1Ia0sYcx,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-12-14T17:46:43.896+0000) > > I now have high hopes for Season 11. Of course this means if you go through the door theres a chance you come out on the other side of the map in true scooby doo fashion
> [{quoted}](name=CaptainAntiHeroz,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=1Ia0sYcx,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-12-14T18:45:45.240+0000) > > Of course this means if you go through the door theres a chance you come out on the other side of the map in true scooby doo fashion Please! My hopes can only get so erect!
: Mind if I can look at what you've said? Not to be rude.
> [{quoted}](name=Acemaster81,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=OAbUoROG,comment-id=000d0000,timestamp=2019-12-14T19:18:00.566+0000) > > Mind if I can look at what you've said? Not to be rude. Sure. I assembled it when someone claimed that no one complained about Sylas just because he's a male champ. I also have a separate file with my complaints about his story/art/sound. But here's just the kit complaints. * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/uoEzAQzY-played-sylas-on-pbe-riot-are-you-feeling-okay?comment=0020 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/memes/VFb7EgfX-when-sylas-ults?comment=0001 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/general-discussion/teWE36Es-sylas-is-a-poorly-designed-champion?comment=000000000000000000000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/general-discussion/sZRERKWB-new-champion-is-literally-rubick-lmao?comment=0003 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/memes/PkalqRvJ-no-u?comment=000000000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/ZHNJ5wEm-sylas-might-be-the-biggest-balance-nightmare-in-the-history-of-league?comment=0011 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/ZHNJ5wEm-sylas-might-be-the-biggest-balance-nightmare-in-the-history-of-league?comment=001100000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/9ZuJ6PAt-sylas-should-not-be-restricted-to-stealing-enemies-ult?comment=00000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/ZHNJ5wEm-sylas-might-be-the-biggest-balance-nightmare-in-the-history-of-league?comment=00150000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/ZHNJ5wEm-sylas-might-be-the-biggest-balance-nightmare-in-the-history-of-league?comment=00160000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/ZHNJ5wEm-sylas-might-be-the-biggest-balance-nightmare-in-the-history-of-league?comment=0016000000000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/ZHNJ5wEm-sylas-might-be-the-biggest-balance-nightmare-in-the-history-of-league?comment=001600000000000000000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/ZHNJ5wEm-sylas-might-be-the-biggest-balance-nightmare-in-the-history-of-league?comment=001e0000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/general-discussion/jos5qRBR-will-riot-ever-understand-how-to-make-an-ap-bruiser-sylas-broken-af?comment=0003 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/general-discussion/ERxZE2LT-i-dont-like-sylas?comment=0001 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/skin-champion-concepts/0IU1boVk-idea-unsealed-spellbook-but-with-champions?comment=0000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/general-discussion/kQBWsqQj-a-quick-thought-about-sylas-ult?comment=0000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/Q8GNw1FU-just-wanted-to-say-about-sylas?comment=0000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/eoLTKxh2-sylas-pros-and-cons?comment=00030000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/QHu2BMBx-imagine-if-udyr-r-was-somthing-along-the-lines-of-olafs?comment=0001 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/R59whrN1-sylas-ultimate-confusion?comment=0001 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/HqEXcJlw-a-more-flexible-idea-for-sylas-ult?comment=0008 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/HqEXcJlw-a-more-flexible-idea-for-sylas-ult?comment=000800000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/HqEXcJlw-a-more-flexible-idea-for-sylas-ult?comment=00080000000000000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/0z8xEOiz-i-feel-like-riot-did-a-really-good-job-on-sylass-mobility?comment=0001 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/YrWhRJNc-sylas-ult-tooltip-qol-improvement-request * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/general-discussion/9lOi4jAX-sylas-isnt-that-bad?comment=0016 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/general-discussion/9lOi4jAX-sylas-isnt-that-bad?comment=00080000000000000001 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/596rItgE-more-damage-and-slow-for-vanguards-edge-gee-thanks-for-buffing * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/Ty83tffV-sylas-is-pretty-lazy-design-tbh-and-busted-even-without-the-ultimate?comment=0001 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/BvAsXkEr-ama-with-the-sylas-team-x-post-from-rleagueoflegends?comment=0019 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/dxEEPoJg-a-company-worth-billions-cant-create-a-equal-and-balanced-game?comment=0002 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/JHPk03kX-sylas-is-so-fucking-overload-who-thought-he-was-balanced-in-any-way?comment=0005 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/8NN468QG-with-people-becoming-more-and-more-familiar-with-sylas-we-need-to-talk-about-ap-bruiser-itemization?comment=0016 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/R4ZFhZn6-guinsoos-rageblade-need-to-be-either-removed-or-phantom-hit-to-cease-to-exist?comment=0018 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/gxQeElPl-i-love-it-when-sylas-can-press-w-and-gain-270-hp-with-a-rank-1-spell-at-lvl-3?comment=0007 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/gxQeElPl-i-love-it-when-sylas-can-press-w-and-gain-270-hp-with-a-rank-1-spell-at-lvl-3?comment=000700000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/gxQeElPl-i-love-it-when-sylas-can-press-w-and-gain-270-hp-with-a-rank-1-spell-at-lvl-3?comment=00070000000000000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/general-discussion/E0AgpZos-riots-been-at-this-for-ten-years?comment=00000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/6BybYl9E-where-did-all-the-hate-for-sylas-go?comment=0006 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/6BybYl9E-where-did-all-the-hate-for-sylas-go?comment=000600000000 * https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/bug-report/KXBfd3Tx-gameplay-after-firing-xeraths-last-ult-shot-sylas-can-basic-attack-once-at-xeraths-ultimate-range?comment=0003
Rockman (NA)
: they should just add doors so we can do a scooby doo chase scene
> [{quoted}](name=Rockman,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=1Ia0sYcx,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-12-14T17:27:08.501+0000) > > they should just add doors so we can do a scooby doo chase scene I now have high hopes for Season 11.
Rioter Comments
Chull (NA)
: #ChampFeelMatters
I have a text file on my computer. The text file is a list of links. Each link points to a post I've made complaining about Sylas's kit and how it is an inherently unbalanceable mess. There are 42 links in the list, because Sylas's kit is an inherently unbalanceable mess. I am sorry that Riot convinced you to get attached to any iteration of it. To be fair, that's almost the only kind of kit they make these days, so people who want to get interested in new champions don't have much of a choice. i hug u (つ . •́ \_ʖ •̀ .)つ
Kpuc (EUW)
: My thread was downvoted by bots. What can I do? Who should I contact and how?
You could contact the mods as directed above, yes, but the only thing they can really do is disable voting on your thread. The alternative is to delete it, repost it later, and hope the vote bot doesn't notice.
: Lethality Tiamat Item
Didn't we just get a new Lethality item? {{item:3181}} You want another one already?
: Has anyone else noticed a pattern with bots in their games.
: There Is Absolutely NO REASON To Be Punished Over This Chat Log (The FULL Log).
It looks like repeatedly insisting that your behavior was fine and that everyone disagreeing with you is a jerk/heretic isn't convincing anyone. Given that LoL's rules are basically framed around the fundamental concept of "don't behave in a way that would bother most people" and most people who have voted and commented here are indicating that your behavior would bother us, I don't think it's that far-fetched for you to reconsider your position and entertain the notion that your behavior broke LoL's rules and did merit a punishment.
Reya8888 (NA)
: Another automated permaban off 1 report
If you know this behavior is a problem: > [{quoted}](name=Reya8888,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=iNBpWO0o,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-12-14T05:16:43.147+0000) > > They flamed me for being an "awful jungle" and begged for reports all game. Why would you engage in it yourself? > [{quoted}](name=Reya8888,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=iNBpWO0o,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-12-14T05:16:43.147+0000) > > Reya8888: wtf are you engaging for aatrox > Reya8888: we can't win that > Reya8888: no.. i ran because they had 3 > Reya8888: the fuck? > ... > Reya8888: free drag again cuz ryze feeds as it spawns, AGAIN > Reya8888: YUP > Reya8888: its gone > Reya8888: ryze died as it spawned again > ... > Reya8888: again blaming me for your horrid engage > Reya8888: stop crying and play > Reya8888: ryze man you can't get caught like that solo > Reya8888: right as drag spawns. AGAIN. > ... > Reya8888: why did u feed in river? > Reya8888: ffs man you know they all there > Reya8888: have some ks gold > ... > Reya8888: muted, reported > Reya8888: hate negative attitude surrender spammers > Reya8888: cry cry cry > Reya8888: PLAY THE GAME. > ... > Reya8888: soraka afk's senna ran at full > Reya8888: sick > Reya8888: soraka afk'd because we wouldn't surrender, gg > ... > Reya8888: i mean do you see soraka? lol > Reya8888: she afk'd @ fountain You argue a lot. Criticism along the lines of "the fuck?" is not constructive, telling people to stop crying is harassment, calling for reports is harassment. Most of what you said had no other purpose than venting; it wasn't useful, positive, or even neutral. You may have been permabanned on this smurf, but at least you still have that D3 account, on which you are behaving yourself with no punishments, right?
: To combat upvoting and downvoting bots
The correct way to handle vote manipulation is to have one or more authorized users with read/write permission on votes so they can detect and correct issues, like Stack Overflow does. Requiring a comment in order to vote just leads to fluff like "+1" and variations thereof. When I open a thread, I don't want to scroll through a giant pile of useless comments from people who didn't have anything to say.
: They reverted the suspension, thank you so much for your help! =)
> [{quoted}](name=AndyBarrelRoll,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=0MlbQlQE,comment-id=000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-12-13T17:24:38.534+0000) > > They reverted the suspension, thank you so much for your help! =) https://i.imgur.com/SXmf8F0.png
: Mords kit (originally from a friend. Not my post)
Sivir's E is a spell shield, which can preemptively block Morde's ult from taking effect, but it can't remove her from the Death Realm once she's in it.
: Mod Abuse is Out of Control
> [{quoted}](name=Kanyoupipu,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=kpqAs7ve,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-12-13T07:33:48.141+0000) > > You are welcome to disagree, **the problem is other people aren't because they will get censored because I am right**. "Would all absent students please raise your hand? Thank you. Since we're all here today..."
Jojobees (NA)
: Okay, so replace the 2-week suspension with a 2 year suspension. It's not allowing toxic players more opportunities to be toxic and it's not sudden that way. "If anything, your ongoing attempts to cancel the punishments prove that you haven't really learned your lesson or owned up to your mistakes, and you probably never will, which is why your bans are permanent." I have three accounts currently in high standing and I've been playing on those without getting banned and it's been 3 years, it will be 4 years in February. I think if I was still toxic I would have been punished since then, but I haven't. I shouldn't care about this account but I do. So sue me.
> [{quoted}](name=Jojobees,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=TZf8UYoq,comment-id=00080000,timestamp=2019-12-13T05:31:57.727+0000) > > Okay, so replace the 2-week suspension with a 2 year suspension. It's not allowing toxic players more opportunities to be toxic and it's not sudden that way. > > "If anything, your ongoing attempts to cancel the punishments prove that you haven't really learned your lesson or owned up to your mistakes, and you probably never will, which is why your bans are permanent." I have three accounts currently in high standing and I've been playing on those without getting banned and it's been 3 years, it will be 4 years in February. I think if I was still toxic I would have been punished since then, but I haven't. > > I shouldn't care about this account but I do. So sue me. It's very nice that your behavior has improved. However, that rarely happens with players who've gotten a permaban, and following the rules on new accounts doesn't mean you followed the rules on old accounts. Those punishments were correct and permanent. Maybe in another few years you'll realize what that means.
Jojobees (NA)
: Coming up on 4 year anniversary of my permanent ban.
This is suggested on Boards pretty frequently, and the answer is no. Riot has no interest in allowing toxic players even more opportunities to be toxic just on the teeny tiny chance that they'll suddenly learn the lessons that two restrictions and a suspension didn't teach them. You are getting canned support replies because you are wasting their time. Those accounts were punished correctly, and permabans are permanent, so you will never get them back. There's no need to bug support every few months. If anything, your ongoing attempts to cancel the punishments prove that you haven't really learned your lesson or owned up to your mistakes, and you probably never will, which is why your bans are _permanent_.
: Ok, thanks for you help! Just sent in a ticket and hope for the best. :) Even though they might not lift it, you've helped me understand a bit more about how the system works, so big thanks!
> [{quoted}](name=AndyBarrelRoll,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=0MlbQlQE,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2019-12-12T11:38:05.770+0000) > > Ok, thanks for you help! Just sent in a ticket and hope for the best. :) > Even though they might not lift it, you've helped me understand a bit more about how the system works, so big thanks! Happy to help, and good luck to you!
: Yeah, I thought about the baby part aswell, but his ign was that haha and I wrote it after he died to an invade. :P Thanks for your opinion, I will send in a ticket! The thing that seems weird to me is that I've never had any chat restrictions before this...
> [{quoted}](name=AndyBarrelRoll,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=0MlbQlQE,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-12-12T11:27:16.431+0000) > > Yeah, I thought about the baby part aswell, but his ign was that haha and I wrote it after he died to an invade. :P > Thanks for your opinion, I will send in a ticket! The thing that seems weird to me is that I've never had any chat restrictions before this... Zero Tolerance (ZT) phrases escalate the punishment tier to a 14-day suspension, skipping the 10-game chat restriction and 25-game chat restriction tiers. Note that if support does label the suspension an error and lift it, be sure to have them check and confirm in writing that your punishment tier is also reset to a clean record, along with Honor restoration, season rewards, and so on.
: 14 Day Suspension, your opinions?
I see a bit of possible racially-charged chat with "you're just a small black baby, nothing you can do against that." But the lines that probably triggered the ZT filter for the IFS: > i want to kys > not kys > kms Honestly, you might want to put in a support ticket about this one and see what happens.
: So can anyone tell me why Garen is getting ANOTHER skin?
> [{quoted}](name=ChickenWrap,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=5TEk9iEg,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-12-12T00:17:54.638+0000) > > Also why is Leona just getting Project 2.0 as a skin when she's already Project? Who thought that one out? K/DA Ahri and Popstar Ahri.
: Ha, not anymore. The Institue of War has been retconned, thusly, The Void is no longer a looming threat developed over decade without any real conflict because the creatures are trapped, it's a looming threat developed over decade without any real conflict.
> [{quoted}](name=Velzard of Koz,realm=EUNE,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=H33c0vkM,comment-id=000a00000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-12-11T17:51:18.250+0000) > > Ha, not anymore. The Institue of War has been retconned, thusly, The Void is no longer a looming threat developed over decade without any real conflict because the creatures are trapped, it's a looming threat developed over decade without any real conflict. https://media1.giphy.com/media/AQOpT2cYxqsjS/source.gif
: What does it have to do with anything? A demigod that is sheer arcane, a group of demigods with aim of destruction or even someone who causes entire rebellion in entire region can be considered backfiring hard with whatever you're aiming at with this sentence? And more than 5 cases of such powerful beings is definitely backfiring more than it should. I also feel like you take this post more seriously than you should, OP is just pointing out how many champions have the "imprisoned, finally broke free to wreak havoc" trope. Exactly because of the reason these are the minority that matters, they matter to be talked about.
> [{quoted}](name=Velzard of Koz,realm=EUNE,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=H33c0vkM,comment-id=000a000000000000,timestamp=2019-12-11T13:46:03.872+0000) > > What does it have to do with anything? > A demigod that is sheer arcane, a group of demigods with aim of destruction or even someone who causes entire rebellion in entire region can be considered backfiring hard with whatever you're aiming at with this sentence? > > And more than 5 cases of such powerful beings is definitely backfiring more than it should. > > I also feel like you take this post more seriously than you should, OP is just pointing out how many champions have the "imprisoned, finally broke free to wreak havoc" trope. Exactly because of the reason these are the minority that matters, they matter to be talked about. Is that better or worse than millions of thieves, murders, arsonists, etc. on the loose? The backfires end up trapped in the League of Legends anyway, so it all works out great. And then they get skins! :D
: So I disabled adblock on YouTube, and immediately I got hit with two 1+ minute un-skippable ads.
I don't use any ad blockers, and most YT videos are fine. I might get a 30s ad before the video (skippable at 5s), and then another every 10-15 minutes or so. Occasionally there are longer ads, but they've always been skippable for me. Sometimes I even watch them if they're funny (which is the marketers' intent), like one for shoes I watched today. I skip the ones about "your soap is shit" because actual soap can irritate sensitive skin, which is why "soapless cleansers" are a thing. "Those are classified as a detergent - it's not natural soap! Ew!" My computer isn't natural either, but it seems to work well even though it's not made out of tofu. I have ads on my YT channel. I used to carefully go through each video and insert ad breaks at the least intrusive times, but my channel got demonetized when YT decided to cut out the little guys. When I got big enough to be remonetized, I just let it automatically choose new ad breaks for everything. I didn't have the patience to go through hundreds of old videos and manually insert ads on my own. My Kindle Fire has an ad on the lock screen and it was $35. For a 7" Android tablet with headphone jack, MicroSD slot, etc. - it even has USB OTG enabled. And I'm not limited to the Amazon app store, as I can sideload APKs. The lock screen is just that: between turning on the display and swiping up, I see an ad instead of whatever stock artwork would be there otherwise (I wouldn't care enough to change it even if I could). Anyway, compare this to Food Network shows, which are 3-5 minutes of ads every 15 minutes or so. Like, it takes 30 seconds to seek through those. It's so cumbersome to watch that channel without a DVR. And compare this to sites that show ads _while_ you view the content, meaning sidebar ads. News sites and wikia sites slow my computer to a crawl because they want to show nine fucking videos all over the page, and then load even more while I'm scrolling. And those collapsible video banner ads at the top of a page that play while you're scrolled down somewhere in the middle of the page, and when they're done playing, they collapse and _the page scoots upward while you're trying to read it_. Websites with no ads or cookies or trackers of any kind - like mine - may look plain, but I highly value usability and performance.
: The problem is it backfires more often that it should and when it does, it backfires hard.
> [{quoted}](name=Velzard of Koz,realm=EUNE,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=H33c0vkM,comment-id=000a0000,timestamp=2019-12-11T13:37:08.787+0000) > > The problem is it backfires more often that it should and when it does, it backfires hard. Do you have data on Runeterran slavery, penal systems, etc. to back up that claim?
: Runeterra PSA: Stop Imprisoning people
Runeterran jail doesn't always give prisoners superpowers. It's just that those are the only ones who turn into champions and whom we end up hearing about. For all we know, there have been millions of prisoners over the course of Runeterra's history, and these dozen or so are the only times it's backfired.
: > [{quoted}](name=KFCeytron,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ELmzvLtT,comment-id=0003000000000001,timestamp=2019-12-11T09:30:50.275+0000) > > No, it's bots that upvoted your thread into the stratosphere almost immediately. The few votes on comments are from neither bots nor Riot employees (big lol there). Sure it is cause that logic makes so much sense right? They upvote posts with bots but don't down vote comments with bots too? Wake up.
> [{quoted}](name=DaimondRageShade,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ELmzvLtT,comment-id=00030000000000010000,timestamp=2019-12-11T09:44:13.996+0000) > > Sure it is cause that logic makes so much sense right? They upvote posts with bots but don't down vote comments with bots too? Wake up. "They" is one person with dozens of accounts and a penchant for making any thread of their choosing seem incredibly popular or incredibly unpopular in a matter of minutes. They generally don't care about comments. You think one or two votes is a bot? Really? Wake yourself up. {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}}
: Guys, a permanent chatrestriction won't work
We've had "we've had this thread before" threads before, too. The people who are making threads on topics like "y no permamute" and "rito steal muh account" aren't regular Boards users who've seen these frequently-posted topics. They experience something in game, like feeders or a chat restriction or unbalanced matchmaking, and they log in to make a thread. They may linger for a while, and then they move on. Either ignore the repetitive threads or prepare a copypasta, otherwise you'll go nuts dealing with the constant low-quality content.
: > [{quoted}](name=Wethys,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ELmzvLtT,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-12-11T08:56:31.637+0000) > > And most of them are permabanned or had previous account permabanned. Well no surprise here Pretty sure those down voting my comments are just riot bots or employees then. Well no surprise there.
> [{quoted}](name=DaimondRageShade,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ELmzvLtT,comment-id=000300000000,timestamp=2019-12-11T08:58:11.263+0000) > > Pretty sure those down voting my comments are just riot bots or employees then. Well no surprise there. No, it's bots that upvoted your thread into the stratosphere almost immediately. The few votes on comments are from neither bots nor Riot employees (big lol there).
: Perma banning in game chat vs entirety of account
60 votes almost immediately... lol. Riot's punishment system used to hand out stacking chat restrictions, such that consistently toxic players basically had a permanent chat restriction. Unfortunately, it turns out that such players used their few chat opportunities to be toxic, and, when they couldn't be as toxic as they wanted to, they resorted to committing non-chat offenses such as griefing (following someone around and taking their farm, using wall abilities to interfere with their play, etc.) or inting. The purpose of the punishment system is to eliminate rule-breaking, not make it worse. Thus, if a couple chat restrictions don't make any difference in a player's misbehavior, the system ramps up the punishments until the player is permabanned and thus unable to use that account to break any more rules ever again. According to [Riot Tantram](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/wsObUaFj-if-tyler1?comment=00010001000000000000): > It really breaks down into two categories. > > 1.) Helping players reform > 2.) Shielding others from the behavior, at a cost. > > We used to issue chat restrictions that essentially scaled indefinitely. > > We were able to determine that after a certain point the penalty no longer helped with reform. The 10-game and 25-game counts for chat restrictions are based on data that they were both light enough, and felt strict enough to encourage people to understand their behavior is unacceptable in game and change it. > > We also saw that the players in this 'large restriction' category defaulted to gameplay altering means of harassing their team. It caused an increase in feeding and trolling. > > The sample size of this population and time frame is huge. Essentially the time spanning from the introduction of chat restrictions to the introduction of IFS. > > So my question for you is, would you rather have more feeders and less negative chat?
: PLZ DO sth about scripters at vs AI bots
It's quite a predicament for co-op vs AI. In PvP, leveling scripts are likely to lose, so human players can in theory win more than they lose, increase their MMR past what a script could attain, and then no longer see any more of those scripts. Co-op vs AI, however, doesn't have MMR at all - which makes perfect sense, given that one team is always of a preset "skill" level anyway. It just takes five players and sticks them together, whether they're level 1, level 100, or taking a break from their LCS scrims. It is thus not just a problem for new accounts, it's a problem for anyone who wants to play the mode at all. I went through your match history and counted 15 leveling scripts (I considered the AFK to be a script, as it was likely just broken) in 9 matches. That's 15 out of 36 accounts, or about 42%. To underscore the severity of this figure, that number (0.42) to the fifth power is the frequency with which a match is _entirely_ populated by bots: about 1%. It would be bad enough if 1% of co-op matches had _one or more_ leveling scripts in them. Of course, you won't personally see these matches, but they're around. Unless a scripter is dumb enough to script one account 24 hours a day (which I have seen before and managed to get banned via support ticket), it can be hard to detect this stuff reliably, without false positives, and without causing scripters to improve their tactics/scripts. Still, it'd be nice if Riot at least acknowledged the issue.
Cõmega (NA)
: How was i insulting?
Broke the rules again, eh? I'm sorry to hear that. Speaking from experience, it takes real effort to incorporate these removals into one's posting habits, being mindful of what one is posting every time one posts. Whenever you feel irritated or dismissive with someone you're responding to, ask yourself whether that's reflected in your post and if you might be toeing the line. If you suspect that what you wrote might eventually show up in a thread like this, maybe try to turn it down a notch. And remember, closing the tab and forgetting about the whole thing is always an option. You'll never be able to respond to every wrong person on the Internet, anyway.
: SO got all my rant posts deleted
The RANT board has rules. It's not a lawless wasteland where you can post literally anything you want. https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/rant/ikMnJcs2-rant-board-rules Here's the rule your post broke: > * No Personal Attacks > * Personal attacks, slurs, bigotry, etc. is [sic] are not permitted and will result in punishments. Attack threads or witch hunts against specific community members, Riot staff, or volunteer moderators are not permitted. We reserve the right to moderate at our own discretion.
: > Actually, if you do something that the rest of your team indicates they're not okay with, that's griefing. Maybe in your mind. I happened to know for a fact, through a Riot employee, that a player is allowed to use any champion in any lane with any spells he desires. That's why there isn't a lock on anything. The only time someone is griefing through gameplay, is when they are inting or purposely leaving their lanes, like a support going mid. So, no, your teammates dont have to agree to anything you choose before the game starts. "The issue here is how the Singed is playing, not which champion he or she chose." Thats the only thing I found from you second reply linking a thread that had someone's tweet in it, assuming its a riot employee, not even sure about that. No where did I even find **your ** actual quote where he says "This guy got banned bc of hundreds of games with bad experience." and if he did say that, then obviously the guy was inting multiple times. If you pick something people arent used to and do good, nobody is going to report you. Unless its 1 dildo who tilts easily. If you pick something people arent used to and do bad, you might get reported and nothing will happen to u unless you cursed all game. If you keep doing it and keep doing bad, then obviously its gonna catch up to you. And youre stupid for repeating something that isnt working anyways, so yea you might as well take a ban. But its definitely ok to try a few times.
> [{quoted}](name=SUPER BIG NUTZ,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=9fsXp4Kc,comment-id=000c0000000000000001,timestamp=2019-12-09T22:51:50.317+0000) > > Maybe in your mind. I happened to know for a fact, through a Riot employee, that a player is allowed to use any champion in any lane with any spells he desires. That's why there isn't a lock on anything. The only time someone is griefing through gameplay, is when they are inting or purposely leaving their lanes, like a support going mid. So, no, your teammates dont have to agree to anything you choose before the game starts. It's not just in my mind. There are things other than inting or leaving your assigned role that are punishable: generally speaking, anything that's intended to anger your teammates. Inting and leaving your lane are just two of many ways to do that. For example, a support could build ADC items and try to get all the CS, initiate fights and then leave as soon as the actual ADC follows up, dance under tower, and so on. And if someone chooses a champion, spells, etc. specifically because they know it gives them a better chance at losing, that's bannable as well (see Nubrac's ban for "roaming support Teemo" which he only uses because it pisses people off). > [{quoted}](name=SUPER BIG NUTZ,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=9fsXp4Kc,comment-id=000c0000000000000001,timestamp=2019-12-09T22:51:50.317+0000) > > "The issue here is how the Singed is playing, not which champion he or she chose." > > Thats the only thing I found from you second reply linking a thread that had someone's tweet in it, assuming its a riot employee, not even sure about that. No where did I even find **your ** actual quote where he says "This guy got banned bc of hundreds of games with bad experience." and if he did say that, then obviously the guy was inting multiple times. They are/were a Riot employee; they just don't have the red name. If you click the link in that thread for "first Rioter comment," the comment I linked is the one you get. Mousing over that user's name also shows that they are/were on the Player Behavior Team. Just click the link I provided and it'll take you right to that comment. I'll link it again here for convenience: https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/79aGu3wR-support-singed-isnt-banable-but-thats-not-the-point?comment=006b And now here's a quote of a few key components of their post, which you can also click to navigate to as well: > [{quoted}](name=Gromp123,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=79aGu3wR,comment-id=006b,timestamp=2016-11-16T21:01:51.342+0000) > > For what it’s worth, we believe the penalty was warranted because in literally hundreds of games the player inflicted a huge amount of disruption on players who didn’t agree to their chemistry experiments. > > The line here is the player repeatedly showing no flexibility in the face of resistance to their strategies, and consistently forcing teammates into a wildly different bot lane experience hundreds of times. Basically, working with your team is a big part of trying to win. > [{quoted}](name=SUPER BIG NUTZ,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=9fsXp4Kc,comment-id=000c0000000000000001,timestamp=2019-12-09T22:51:50.317+0000) > > If you pick something people arent used to and do good, nobody is going to report you. Unless its 1 dildo who tilts easily. This is begging the question. You're attempting to support a conclusion of "the behavior in question is acceptable" with a claim that anyone who disagrees and reports such behavior is wrong. > [{quoted}](name=SUPER BIG NUTZ,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=9fsXp4Kc,comment-id=000c0000000000000001,timestamp=2019-12-09T22:51:50.317+0000) > > If you pick something people arent used to and do bad, you might get reported and nothing will happen to u unless you cursed all game. If you keep doing it and keep doing bad, then obviously its gonna catch up to you. And youre stupid for repeating something that isnt working anyways, so yea you might as well take a ban. But its definitely ok to try a few times. Do you realize that you just agreed with me and negated the entire rest of your post? Continued griefing of this type is rarely caught and punished with the first transgression (I've seen people int while screaming homophobic slurs and not get any punishment - it's actually really difficult to get punished in LoL), but eventually the system will recognize it and realize that such a player is actually griefing, resulting in a ban. It's "ok to try a few times" only in the sense that it probably won't result in an immediate punishment. It's _not_ okay in terms of being within the rules, which is why it may eventually result in a ban (a fact which, again, you have just conceded).
: Illaoi's Skin Concept by someone that has 0 drawing skills
: > [{quoted}](name=KFCeytron,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=V2qwiV2V,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2019-12-09T12:27:31.643+0000) > > {{sticker:sg-lux-2}} I advise you to read what the OP wrote again. His initial post was calling Riot incompetent and that got removed. That is the problem here. We don't care about the second or third post he made. Stop advocating for the wrong side here mate.
> [{quoted}](name=SirTauntsALot,realm=EUW,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=V2qwiV2V,comment-id=0002000000000000,timestamp=2019-12-09T13:10:18.325+0000) > > I advise you to read what the OP wrote again. His initial post was calling Riot incompetent and that got removed. That is the problem here. We don't care about the second or third post he made. Stop advocating for the wrong side here mate. OP deemed the first removal a moderation "mistake." OP then devoted almost as much space to discussing the second removal. This second removal is the one that OP believes constitutes "censorship, abuse, and harassment" on the part of the mod team, which prompted OP to create this thread and put such in the title. OP's theories and accusations concerning the second removal make it clear that OP wants the rules to follow them and not the other way around, making this discussion DOA.
Rockman (NA)
: Is Kled the "one time back in..." kinda guy?
https://i.imgur.com/eIlXPVt.png[] EDIT: My bad, forgot someone important. https://i.imgur.com/p7kbJQQ.png[] ######[skaarl source](https://www.deviantart.com/istrandar/art/Kled-and-skaarl-711159097)
: When a customer says your company is "Incompetent" I would expect you first check and fix your company. Or maybe ask what is wrong with the customer for describing your services as incompetent. You don't throw the complaint in the trash and suggest it's "offensive". That not only is unethical but unprofessional as well. > Indeed. That's basically the definition of incompetence. They don't even know what they're doing. > Or, maybe, they know, and just try to "sugarcoat" their terrible philosophy about what's left of this game. I would like to know the rule the OP violated. I see nothing offensive in the above. I see a customer who is not satisfied for what he is paying for.
> [{quoted}](name=SirTauntsALot,realm=EUW,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=V2qwiV2V,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-12-09T12:15:07.261+0000) > > When a customer says your company is "Incompetent" I would expect you first check and fix your company. Or maybe ask what is wrong with the customer for describing your services as incompetent. You don't throw the complaint in the trash and suggest it's "offensive". That not only is unethical but unprofessional as well. > > I would like to know the rule the OP violated. I see nothing offensive in the above. I see a customer who is not satisfied for what he is paying for. {{sticker:sg-lux-2}} > [{quoted}](name=KFCeytron,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=V2qwiV2V,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-12-09T11:25:01.104+0000) > > I think that accusations of incompetence are a grey area that does merit discussion. > > ... > > If the issue at hand was merely whether a declaration of incompetence is an insult/harassment, that would be one thing.
: > [{quoted}](name=KFCeytron,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=QFhcip6G,comment-id=0003000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-12-09T05:58:38.114+0000) > > Either figure out (with or without our help) what Riot says you did wrong and correct it, or keep behaving in a way that generates reports that result in punishments which will eventually mean a permaban. It's up to you. It's obvious you didn't read. Or a troll. Either way its a little sad.
> [{quoted}](name=KnightLakega,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=QFhcip6G,comment-id=00030000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-12-09T11:26:32.270+0000) > > It's obvious you didn't read. Or a troll. Either way its a little sad. I read it. You still think you're right, and nothing anyone says has any effect on you. I'm out of this useless conversation. Goodbye.
Nea104 (EUW)
: Mods are not just "failing". It seems they are intentionally censoring undesired messages and users.
I think that accusations of incompetence are a grey area that does merit discussion. However, doing the following: > [{quoted}](name=Nea104,realm=EUW,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=V2qwiV2V,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-12-08T20:09:23.417+0000) > > In fact, I re-posted my comment, explain how who failed in removing it (J.) should have been more careful about abusing his powers just because disagreeing with other users' opinions. Is incredibly and blatantly obviously a bad idea. I can see posting something that you think is within the rules and then discovering that it isn't (which you did, and got you a removal with a message but no warning). But when you know for 100% certain that a given post is not okay and mods believe that it breaks the rules, reposting that is not just a slip-up. It's breaking the rules on purpose, thumbing your nose at authority, and basically daring the mods to mess with you again. Well, guess what? They'll take that dare. When they see you ignore their message that given content is not appropriate, they'll do what they need to do to ensure that you can't repost that inappropriate content, which is suspend you. > And here again, another guy from the Mod Team (U.) intentionally twisted the Rules that he himself should take care of. > He removed my comment again, disregarding the fact that the previous Mod already had abused his powers, and applied a **"3-day suspension" to my Boards account**. Reposting your removed content won't convince the mods that the removal is incorrect. It just tells them you ignore rules as long as you're physically capable of doing so, which is why they suspended you. > A **3-day ban**, to cover up another **Moderator's mistake**. Is it not obvious to you that your snubbing of the rules didn't convince them the removal was a mistake? You were suspended not to cover up a mistake, but because it seemed to be the only way to get you to stop breaking rules. > That means, it probably wasn't a mistake, and it hasn't been a double mistake neither, with that second wrong action: this looks like **censorship**, mod tools and powers **abuse**, and overall **harassment** towards one Board user. It's not about censorship, abuse of mod tools or powers, or harassment. It's about getting you to at least make an effort to follow the rules. If you're not allowed to step on the grass but you do it anyway, a police officer might call to you and request that you exit that area. If you tell them "you failed as a police officer, you can't stop me, I didn't break any rules, stepping on the grass is a personal issue of yours, inexperience is no excuse, I'm going to keep walking on the grass, and I'm gonna call the police department and insist that they fire you" and keep stomping on the grass, the officer isn't going to suddenly think they were wrong to chastise you and walk meekly away, and they're not going to call to you again. They're gonna go in there and escort you off the grass by force. If the issue at hand was merely whether a declaration of incompetence is an insult/harassment, that would be one thing. But your response to the removal totally destroyed any sympathy I might've had towards your position.
: Can Presence of Mind give Shen 20 energy (up to +100) to match his doubled energy pool and costs?
I just learned that PoM's ult CD refund was removed in favor of totally redundant mana and now I am sad.
: > [{quoted}](name=KFCeytron,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=QFhcip6G,comment-id=00030000000000000000,timestamp=2019-12-08T10:24:52.384+0000) > > Riot does not accept it, and they make the rules (based on the desires of most customers). That makes it unacceptable, quite literally. > > The people who reported you felt attacked by what they perceived as your toxic behavior. Most of your chat messages are devoted to arguing, spreading blame, and insults. I don't think it's too surprising that someone might not like that. > > What your team was or wasn't spamming is irrelevant to your chat restriction. You are given a punishment based on your behavior and no one else's. > > Note how I'm taking time out of my day to help you and you repay me with insults, calling me dense. Do you think that's not "actually wrong" to do? > > You got punished because you broke the rules. It doesn't matter whether you like them. If you break them, you can get a punishment. > > If you'd really like me to point out and explain your "toxic moments" so that you can avoid such behavior in the future and keep your account free of increasing punishments (which will eventually conclude with a permaban if you continue this kind of behavior), I would respond to a courteous request. You actually answered my question. 1) I didn't do anything wrong. 2) If Riot says typing the letter A is wrong, and toxic, then its toxic.. by everyones standards on this board, and Riots, regardless of the actual reality. Therefore I got punished. it does seem simple really. There is nothing to it. You actually pointed out whats wrong with society and the "progressive" game companies like Riot. Anyone can feel "Attacked" for any petty stupid reason, that doesn't mean you should go handing out punishments to people, but again you're absolutely right, its Riots world and they can F up their community as much as they want. The only thing protecting over sensitive gamers will do is create a toxic environment as they start eating at themselves as well. Nothing I said was toxic, or insulting. Blaming is fine, if taken responsibly by both parties, which 9/10 players in league cannot handle. if I mess up and get called out on it, I admit it, proof is even in the OP, I took it like an adult and kept going, the moment I shift legit blame to Vvlad though? oh boy, he turns insanely toxic, and now I'm the one at fault.. There's a winning logic for ya..
> [{quoted}](name=KnightLakega,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=QFhcip6G,comment-id=000300000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-12-09T04:42:05.831+0000) > > You actually answered my question. > > 1) I didn't do anything wrong. > > 2) If Riot says typing the letter A is wrong, and toxic, then its toxic.. by everyones standards on this board, and Riots, regardless of the actual reality. > > Therefore I got punished. > > it does seem simple really. There is nothing to it. > > You actually pointed out whats wrong with society and the "progressive" game companies like Riot. Anyone can feel "Attacked" for any petty stupid reason, that doesn't mean you should go handing out punishments to people, but again you're absolutely right, its Riots world and they can F up their community as much as they want. > > The only thing protecting over sensitive gamers will do is create a toxic environment as they start eating at themselves as well. > > Nothing I said was toxic, or insulting. Blaming is fine, if taken responsibly by both parties, which 9/10 players in league cannot handle. if I mess up and get called out on it, I admit it, proof is even in the OP, I took it like an adult and kept going, the moment I shift legit blame to Vvlad though? oh boy, he turns insanely toxic, and now I'm the one at fault.. > > There's a winning logic for ya.. Either figure out (with or without our help) what Riot says you did wrong and correct it, or keep behaving in a way that generates reports that result in punishments which will eventually mean a permaban. It's up to you.
Yenn (NA)
: Now that Kennen is in the dumpster with pre-season changes, can he finally get the rework he needs?
Are you sure you want a Kennen rework? From what I recall, you enjoy that champion. If he gets a rework, he won't play the same way anymore, and might even end up completely different like Aatrox did.
: All Female Tournament
Y'know, every time someone suggests a separate but equal LoL for women, I'm sure we all think of how sexist and ridiculous that is due to LoL not being a physical activity and thus having an equal playing field, but now that I think of it, it might actually be worthwhile merely due to numbers. There simply aren't nearly as many women out there who have the skill and motivation to play LoL at a professional level. I think I've heard of the occasional woman being on a pro team, but whenever someone tries to put together an all-female team it ends up consisting of Diamonds and Masters or something, and they can't seriously compete. The candidate pool just isn't big enough. If as many women were driven to excel at LoL as men are, I'm sure it'd be around 50/50, but it simply isn't. So perhaps an entirely separate tournament, drawing from lower skill tiers so as to include more women, would be appropriate.
: Mordekaiser Could Cure Depression
If he told them to divide into an army one billion strong with laser eyes and super strength for every soldier, would they do it?
: > [{quoted}](name=KFCeytron,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=QFhcip6G,comment-id=000300000000,timestamp=2019-12-08T05:59:39.004+0000) > > It is actually not acceptable behavior. This is the message the chat restriction is intended to convey to you. Explain why. Because it's beyond my comprehension why saying something which does nothing, attacks nobody, and doesn't create a toxic environment is wrong to the level of requiring any punishment. If I was to afk, then great. Also keep in mind, my entire team was constantly spamming "just afk, you're trash". At that point if I Had afked. Guess what would of happened? absolutely nothing.. THAT would of been punishable imo, yet the thing which is actually toxic is not even punished or enforced, but just because I happen to type I'm afking, then not actually do it.. is toxic? Are you really that dense to believe this is actually wrong? Just because I got punished doesn't mean I did anything wrong, hence the post. Nobody has yet reasonably, intelligently, and untrollishly explained anything, besides "you said some words, you got punished." is the farthest of the argument so far lol... To make matters more laughable to anyone who's downvoting this, or agreeing with Riot, even by Riots own words, jostling, and wise cracks are fine.. Not their exact words, and while I was obviously irritated, irritation is not toxic, or bannable... I never once said anything outside of irritation, and in terms of "just dodge" playful poking to someone who did it to me... Still waiting for those toxic moments even by Riots extreme snowflake standards.
> [{quoted}](name=KnightLakega,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=QFhcip6G,comment-id=0003000000000000,timestamp=2019-12-08T09:00:31.519+0000) > > Explain why. > > Because it's beyond my comprehension why saying something which does nothing, attacks nobody, and doesn't create a toxic environment is wrong to the level of requiring any punishment. > > If I was to afk, then great. > > Also keep in mind, my entire team was constantly spamming "just afk, you're trash". At that point if I Had afked. Guess what would of happened? absolutely nothing.. THAT would of been punishable imo, yet the thing which is actually toxic is not even punished or enforced, but just because I happen to type I'm afking, then not actually do it.. is toxic? > > Are you really that dense to believe this is actually wrong? > > Just because I got punished doesn't mean I did anything wrong, hence the post. > > Nobody has yet reasonably, intelligently, and untrollishly explained anything, besides "you said some words, you got punished." is the farthest of the argument so far lol... > > To make matters more laughable to anyone who's downvoting this, or agreeing with Riot, even by Riots own words, jostling, and wise cracks are fine.. Not their exact words, and while I was obviously irritated, irritation is not toxic, or bannable... > > I never once said anything outside of irritation, and in terms of "just dodge" playful poking to someone who did it to me... > > Still waiting for those toxic moments even by Riots extreme snowflake standards. Riot does not accept it, and they make the rules (based on the desires of most customers). That makes it unacceptable, quite literally. The people who reported you felt attacked by what they perceived as your toxic behavior. Most of your chat messages are devoted to arguing, spreading blame, and insults. I don't think it's too surprising that someone might not like that. What your team was or wasn't spamming is irrelevant to your chat restriction. You are given a punishment based on your behavior and no one else's. Note how I'm taking time out of my day to help you and you repay me with insults, calling me dense. Do you think that's not "actually wrong" to do? You got punished because you broke the rules. It doesn't matter whether you like them. If you break them, you can get a punishment. If you'd really like me to point out and explain your "toxic moments" so that you can avoid such behavior in the future and keep your account free of increasing punishments (which will eventually conclude with a permaban if you continue this kind of behavior), I would respond to a courteous request.
: > [{quoted}](name=iiGazeii,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=QFhcip6G,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-11-28T16:06:02.747+0000) > > I've raged, complained and criticized, and I ended this season at honor level 5. The thing is, I keep it civil. I don't be overly mean or aggressive, I don't say slurs or threaten to AFK/leave. You don't need perfect behavior, just acceptable behavior. It is acceptable behavior. Saying you're gonna afk and not doing it is fine lol.. I've never been tilted when someone is like "I'm gonna afk" then they didn't, and kept trying to pull a win..
> [{quoted}](name=KnightLakega,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=QFhcip6G,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-12-08T05:56:23.285+0000) > > It is acceptable behavior. Saying you're gonna afk and not doing it is fine lol.. I've never been tilted when someone is like "I'm gonna afk" then they didn't, and kept trying to pull a win.. It is actually not acceptable behavior. This is the message the chat restriction is intended to convey to you.
Show more

KFCeytron

Level 88 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion