: Very Simple Practice Tool Improvement: Click to Kill Unit
Is there a projected time for the tool to hit live?
Sharjo (EUW)
: Warwick: The Wrath of Zaun - Champion Teaser
If this was somehow made into a 3d/VR video it'd be one of the coolest things to see.
: " you're seeking scraps of an argument because you know you have none." actually your just making an asumtion about me. you clearly dont know my intentions. if you think some ones is stupid because they dont care about proper english grammer spelling and such then the problem is with YOU. not me. "if you can't make complete sentences" i never i cant. i said i dont care. big difference. "no one should care about spelling" on this platform. not in general. "Please kid, let yourself age and mature some before you make bold statements you can't even back up." because calling people kid to degrade them is mature uh huh -__- "will make me take you less seriously," i dont care... " if you're saying I can't think outside the box then you're gravely mistaken." ment to say cant. woops. hey prick you dont know anything about me and your still judging me just think about that for a second. how well does that usually go? edit: dont talk to me ever again.
Ok. because you want to stop losing in an argument I can make this short. You say I don't know anything about you, and that's mostly true. Regardless, the little bit of you that you are showing is childish and un-educated, so I judge you accordingly. I've given you ample opportunities to prove me wrong, and you haven't. I refuse to accept that you're smart (no offense) without you showing me otherwise. I don't call you a kid to try and seem more mature than you, I call you a kid because you present yourself as one. I don't care if you have a Doctorate's Degree in Biochemical Engineering, the way you present yourself I'd think you're a 3-year-old. > hey prick you dont know anything about me and your still judging me just think about that for a second. how well does that usually go? If you want my honest answer, so far it's gone with you saying the same thing over and over, as well as me winning the argument, while giving you multiple chances you prove yourself. Not in even one of those chances that I -consciously- gave you did you ever prove yourself. So, so far it's not going bad even while leaving holes in my argument. I call you a kid because you seem like one, I say that's it's okay to lose an argument because of that fact. You haven't proven me wrong -in my thoughts about you-, which isn't necessarily bad, you just failed on your part.
: oh yes :D now were having fun! the first part still has tons of subtext tho i hope you read it. so i am rereading everything i say to make sure its readable making sure i dont forget key words like "not" but as far as spelling im not worried about it as long as the messege gets there. "Using the platform as an excuse does nothing for you, it just shows me you don't hold yourself to higher standards, making excuses to justify your lack of work. "no one should care about spelling"...." with spelling i dont have high standards your right i dont see a reason to for this kind of platform or for youtube comments. i do however have very high standards for myself with other things i am actually a very intelligent person and i refuse to settle for less than my best. im still working on my champ pool a bit but after that im hitting ranked. i wont say how high im aiming i'ed rather just wait and show it then say it and deal with the flak of people who cant think out side the box not saying you can think out side the box. for whatever reason humans care about what others think even if that person knows nothing about what there talking about i dont get it i guess that just life :/. that being said i do know how to shake of the crap people throw. "Lack of education comes from lack of work which comes from lack of real drive." lack of education also comes from what the schools are doing which does come into play here a little kid doesnt know any better unless there taught and likewise alot of people dont understand the power of knowledge and wisdom unless some one shows them and of course everyone is different some people are just never taught how to become smart. its also worth bringing up that moral foolishness and intellectual foolishness go hand and hand. there i spelled it right u happy? :P work and drive are quite lacking in america too: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/e9/b2/76/e9b2765fd91f9c0f6008396ce3ccf78c.jpg http://paulhastings.me/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Im-Luggin-It-Fat-Giraffe.jpg http://www.mypokecard.com/en/Gallery/my/galery/nssSLE1Le48D.jpg so whats your solution for dealing with moral and intellectual foolishness and with lack of drive? there are of course peeps that get government assisted living and could get a job but just dont want to and then theres peeps who clearly need help and then theres the hard to tell ones. #teamlucian
You're once again just proving my point, you're seeking scraps of an argument because **you know you have none.** I'm giving you ample amount of opportunities to make an argument, and you aren't. Still trying to drive the argument off point and I'm not letting you, I bring it back and you try to swerve it away. > "Using the platform as an excuse does nothing for you, it just shows me you don't hold yourself to higher standards, making excuses to justify your lack of work. "no one should care about spelling"...." with spelling i dont have high standards your right i dont see a reason to for this kind of platform or for youtube comments. i do however have very high standards for myself with other things i am actually a very intelligent person and i refuse to settle for less than my best. Buddy, if you can't make complete sentences then I'm not gonna believe a word you say, by doing this _you're putting yourself_ in an inferior position. Also, you complain about the education system and at the same time say that _no one_ should care about spelling, you're making this too easy for me my man. You just made a hole in your own argument. Please kid, let yourself age and mature some before you make bold statements you can't even back up. The fact that you feel like the boards/YT are a place where you shouldn't be serious will make me take you less seriously, and I'm not believing you're smart -or out of 6th grade- for a second until you start acting like it. Devaluing something just because it's online is the most naive thing I'v ever heard. > im still working on my champ pool a bit but after that im hitting ranked. i wont say how high im aiming i'ed rather just wait and show it then say it and deal with the flak of people who cant think out side the box not saying you can think out side the box Ok, I'll ignore the champ pool stuff because I'm not letting you try and run. Also, because of your broken English I have no clue what the 2nd part is even supposed too mean, if you're saying I can't think outside the box then you're gravely mistaken. > for whatever reason humans care about what others think even if that person knows nothing about what there talking about i dont get it i guess that just life :/. that being said i do know how to shake of the crap people throw. "Lack of education comes from lack of work which comes from lack of real drive." lack of education also comes from what the schools are doing which does come into play here a little kid doesnt know any better unless there taught and likewise alot of people dont understand the power of knowledge and wisdom unless some one shows them and of course everyone is different some people are just never taught how to become smart. its also worth bringing up that moral foolishness and intellectual foolishness go hand and hand. there i spelled it right u happy? :P work and drive are quite lacking in america too tbh, you should care what others think if you wanna better yourself. You already know what I think about you because -according to you you're smart- you're misrepresenting yourself, making it seem like you haven't passed the 6th grade. The whole rest of what you say is something teachers teach lmao, indeed, knowledge is important, you should check that out. Of course everyone is different lol, that's why there's a thing we like to call, wait for it, "specialization". That's why teacher take their own time to do 1 on 1 work with students. > work and drive are quite lacking in america too Ok, do you wanna know how dumb your argument is? YOU COULD SAY THESE THINGS ABOUT ANY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. Then you try and post some memes to prove a point, a meme not related to education. > so whats your solution for dealing with moral and intellectual foolishness and with lack of drive? there are of course peeps that get government assisted living and could get a job but just dont want to and then theres peeps who clearly need help and then theres the hard to tell ones. Don't even try and force this argument onto me, there's a reason I'm not a county Director/ Superintendent. You once again are trying too put this one me, once again trying to drive the pressure off of you. Stand up to my argument rather than trying to create new ones. I'm saying that you have a bad argument, and you're trying to get me to find the solution to people's lack of intended productivity.
: "buddy" actually my real name its frieght train722 thats my real name and everyone makes fun of me for it. i was abondoned by my parents and raaised by a small pack of trains in the wild plz excuse my bad spellins i mean trains arent exactly known for there processing power. but if theres one thing ive learned surviveing off spare gasaline and only being fixed with rusty old parts its that life isnt about how fast you go or how fancy your cabs are its about the tracks you ride its about the trains you run into and gas prices they friggin suck >:( letss create a world where all trains can ride free where gas prices dont suck and all trains can grow tires and never again be bound by the standard track. OMG I JUST RELIZED THERES TONS OF SUB TEXT THAT I DIDNT EVEN MEAN TO PUT THERE XD. anyway if you understand the points i made in the first comment thats all that matters. "by having incorrect grammar you're including yourself in that bunch, you're legit just proving your point by talking more." actually incorrect grammar and spelling show i dont care about it. if i was writing an important buisness letter or legal document sure but this is the comments section for a vote on a hyperthetically battle in a video game -__- no one should care about spelling. do you honestly think im stupid because i dont spell check everything? cuz thats not how it works. if you think im stupid because i dont spell check here then something is wrong with YOU not me.
For purposes of real conversation I'll ignore that first part. I'm not saying you're stupid, but you're mostly definitely not proving otherwise by the way you talk. Tbh, you don't even have to check, just put some effort into your writing, because I can tell you aren't now. Using the platform as an excuse does nothing for you, it just shows me you don't hold yourself to higher standards, making excuses to justify your lack of work. "no one should care about spelling"- and you said that America has an education problem? Lack of education comes from lack of work which comes from lack of real drive. You just said you don't care, which goes to my last point. Don't try to drive this off point, I put you on the spot and you're getting defensive now that I did, seeking scraps of an argument to get out of this hole.
Sentinos (NA)
: I love the announcer's voice. She's hot.
If there a new one or do you just like the current?
: " you didn't even capitalize a proper noun." no one cares.......and america does have intulectual problems it doesnt take long to figure that out.
Buddy, by having incorrect grammar you're including yourself in that bunch, you're legit just proving your point by talking more. You could say that about any country lol. "Out of a 300+ million person population they have a bunch of bad apples." With a big sample size you get different results. I could legit take your statement and say it about **any other country in the world.** Your logic is flawed and please do yourself a favor and get out of 6th grade before making any more bold statements that only a small portion of Reddit will back you up on.
: i bet people are going to just pick there fave champ without even thinking about how the matchup up would actually go. threshes q has a 20 - 12 second cd that gets reduced by 3 secs when it hits an enemy. lucian e has an 18 - 14 sec cd and the cd is reduced by 1 sec for each passive strike 2 secs vs champs. thresh has 450 AA range. lucian has 500 AA range. not enough to be huge but enough to have an impact. lucian could easily save e for thresh q and then use passive and each ability make note that lucian passive is a double strike in case you didnt know. if lucian properly gets all basic abilities off and proc his passive for each ability then lucian takes 12 secs of his e cd. it should also be noted that lucian w gives 60 - 80 bonus move speed. - and lucian w is a really weird skill shot, last i checked if you hover it it doesnt give a clear indication of what the cross hit boz looks like in terms of size and...shape...i know that sounds bad lol....is it a pointy cross? right angles? rounded O___O? rito plz some of the skill shot display things suck like kinx rocket only gives the width not explosion radius wich is kinad important ya know. anyway lucian w is weird and idk how well you can use it when being walled by minions. and then theres early game performance ive noticed every time i play thresh his early game is weird, acording to lol wiki thresh has flat 16 base armor wich isnt alot thresh is ment to get dem hooks early but his armor is so low minions do alot to him and of course lucian loves that he has low armor too. thresh gains .75 armor and ability power per soul. "large enemies" and champions always drop a soul and as an easter egg nunu drops 2 -___- rly riot. the drop rate for small minions is 33% and adjusts slightly if you above or below your qouta and it trys to keep you where your suppossed to be but only by slight adjustments. tl;dr tresh has his infinite scaling on passive but hes still pretty squish early. lucian has strong early game thats all i got to say about it. long story short lucian vs thresh it would look like thresh would win to a less experienced player and or if they only look at the surface. higher level players will probly figure it out pretty fast tho that lucian has VERY big advantages and he can control the tone of the game. so asuming both players are smart lucian would win basicly every time. have a good day all. but lets be real people wont care this is league of hive mind / herd mentality and this is north america and i cant speak for other countries but america has very very serious intulectual issues and we dont even teach logical reasoning classes in schools and believe me this country needs it.
You were doing fine right until you tried to accuse North America of some intellectual deficit, and you didn't even capitalize a proper noun.
: No, skojz wouldn't be able to sleep...
: Jhin Pentakill Montage - #Jhin
{{champion:202}} takill
: > [{quoted}](name=KOC rule,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Xa3LXvGN,comment-id=0010000000020000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2016-05-14T05:18:47.925+0000) > > You're saying that they both make millions, the reason he linked that is because Riot still makes more, sure it's still a lot of money for Valve, but more for Riot. Riot has one game that they have to make a lot of money off of, Valve has a platform, Dota is just another money source. > > Ok, come on man, here you're just making up bullshit lmao. They most likely _will_ like those champs, they started on them, they -theoretically- provide a simple playlstyle for their roles. Even then, when you're given **eight different champs a week** chances are you can find one you like, and it isn't just ripped away instantly. When Braum was free I got him to Mastery rank 4, without even owning him. When that week ended I wasn't super determined to get Braum, I was like, "Well he's fun". > > Except for it not really random, if you're lv20 playing bot games it'll take a long time, if you're playing norms it'll take a bit depending on how much you play. > > You say that last part trying to make the game sound like it's decaying, when they change it, it'll be changed, hopefully better. You're pointlessly trying to make Riot sound worse than they are. They're pumping out content and reworks/updates as fast as possible to keep the game relevant. Not that they need constant changes to stay relevant, but they want the game to feel like a 21st century game, and updating is part of that. They're pumping out content at an incredibly fast rate, and the quality isn't taking much of a hit from that. Regardless of what you're gonna pull out of thin air on this one, the game feels better than it used to. And? Riot makes more, ok. Still doesn't take away from the fact that Riot could make EVEN MORE if they followed Dota's example. How is it bullshit? How do you know that someone will like them? Different champs have different things, from aesthetics to gameplay. I hated Ashe when I first played her. Yes, I know I'm not representative of an entire gaming population, but the point stands. Chances are other people may not like them either. And the issue is not whether or not someone is going to find a champ they enjoy. The issue comes when you want to keep them permanently. Braum is fun, I agree with you, but he's a hefty 6300. Someone whose just getting into the game or may play leisurely won't be getting that anytime soon. (Fyi you can't earn mastery for a champ you don't own). And again, I bring up ranked play. You can't use free rotation in ranked. High quality/meta champs are expensive in terms of IP, and in matches that are heavily focused on winning, you want the best champs to choose. I don't know if any of the 450 champs are top tier, aside from maybe Ryze? But it IS decaying. Can you honestly say Riot listens to community feedback? No. Can you say the game is in a balanced state where most champs are played? Absolutely not. The pro scene showed that with a handful of champs always being picked for roles(tank ekko, graves jungle). Can you say matchmaking is in a state that ensure fair and fun games? Depends on who you ask, but usually the answer is no. Pro's even have issues with it. Yes, they are pumping out new content, a new champ is to come out soon. But that is inherently the problem. Riot is pushing more and more content into a game that severely needs a balance check. They are making it harder and harder for them to maintain any semblance of balance. Instead of simply stepping back, looking at champs and tweaking numbers here and there to help some champs that are in ruts and bring others down a notch, they just push new content. And honestly, that's what they want, because they know players like you are going to jump on the FotM bandwagon and forgot about whatever current issue is going on. "Make it a 21st century game"? No, it was already a modern game. Tell me, how is the game feeling better than it use to when, for example, with the mid-season update, they added RNG to dragon spawns? Riot said they wanted to remove RNG from the game, its why they removed evasion a long time ago, yet here they are adding RNG. Seriously think about what I have said, rather then just trying to blow off my arguments with fallacies, as this is my last response to you. I guarantee you haven't been playing a long time, probably only for maybe two years or so, if you honestly believe the game is "better than it used to".
Ok, Riot makes more doing things their way, so how would they make more doing things like Dota, who made less than them? Listen to this now, now you sound reasonable, good. You gave one extreme and I gave out the other, now we're level, see how that works? It's up in the air on whether someone will like a champion or not, they can decide though. But it gives them a goal to get too, giving them an incentive to play. If they happen to start liking another champion then it gives them another goal and makes them think about what champion they want more. Also, I swear I got mastery points on him. Ok, a new player isn't gonna using ranked lmao. If you wanna play a free week in ranked then you can save up for it. You shouldn't be using a champ you're fairly new too in ranked regardless. Kayle is decent, Raka is really good, Annie is decent, Sivir is top tier, Poppy is most definitely top tier, and ofc Ryze. Riot listens to more feedback than you'd think, but regardless many times the community doesn't know what they want. Only a small portion of the community actually posts on the boards, they are, in fact, the minority. People don't speak up -much- if they're satisfied with the game. The reason most champs are play is because, sure some champs are basically unplayable at a decent level, but that's why they're doing updates. Another big reason is people don't try and develop a style with them. Tank Ekko -I think- could've been a thing since his release, no single change set him off, people tried new things and people figured out he was op. Sure, they have balancing problems, I'll even admit that. That's a thing to work on though, and they're trying it their own way, you can't really "balance" Yorick or Warwick right now because they're just in an awkward state with the inability of being good at higher levels. Will this fail? Who knows, we'll have to find out whether this is a good way to balance it. They're doing packet updates for certain roles trying that way as well, some champions they don't "balance" because they wanna remake their playstyle. Currently the game feels more smooth than ever, and that's what it needs to be to stay on top. Sure, there's RNG on dragons, but each one benefits you, is the RNG good? Depends on who you're asking, it can make the game more fun and random, or less reliable. I personally like it. Graves might be fairly strong atm, but he still feels alot more fun now than he used too. These new champs/updates bring new, fun mechanics into the game that make it more interesting and flashy, with makes the game more interesting. btw, I'v been playing since Season 3, so I have a pretty good idea of what the game used to be as compared to now, and my opinion stands. All the changes they've made have make the game feel more smooth, that was always the reason I couldn't play Dota. Even though Dota 2 had more interesting abilities, it always felt too "chunky". Nothing felt good to use in that game, whereas looking at lol it feels more smooth. Still felt slightly "chunky" in HotS, not quite as much as Dota, but it stands. As a main comparison, just looks at the auto-attacks. And I consider about half the game's life a decent amount of time.
: > [{quoted}](name=Kuroi86,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Xa3LXvGN,comment-id=00100000000200000000000000000000,timestamp=2016-05-14T04:14:54.322+0000) > > http://www.kdramastars.com/articles/14664/20140123/dota-2-vs-lol.htm > > ... huh? > I didn't say you could buy IP, Riot doesn't sell it. Cast transactions are only through RP while IP is earned through games. > > New players can play through the tutorial, granting them IP to purchase a 450 champ. > > You don't lose IP, you can earn less, but you don't lose any. > > Even some reds have stated they want to do work on the rune system. It's not a big enough issue to worry about atm but I foresee it getting something of an overhaul in the next couple of years. Not sure why you are linking me this article. I never said one makes more over the other, just pointing out the Dota still makes millions while being completely free to play and giving access to all champs, showing your statement that "Riot needs to make money" is utter bullshit. You said you could buy champs and other content. People most commonly use IP on champs, I know very few people who willingly spend RP on champs. Just a euphemism that was probably not as clear as it should have been. Oh, you mean a 450 champ that they most likely did not want or fall in love with during free rotation, furthering my point. Also, the tutorial is a joke if we are going to mention it. I know that, that's what I said. Your not guaranteed a certain time frame to gain enough IP. It's honestly sort of random. I'm glad they plan to address it in years to come, long after many players, new and old, leave this game.
You're saying that they both make millions, the reason he linked that is because Riot still makes more, sure it's still a lot of money for Valve, but more for Riot. Riot has one game that they have to make a lot of money off of, Valve has a platform, Dota is just another money source. > Oh, you mean a 450 champ that they most likely did not want or fall in love with during free rotation, furthering my point. Also, the tutorial is a joke if we are going to mention it. Ok, come on man, here you're just making up bullshit lmao. They most likely _will_ like those champs, they started on them, they -theoretically- provide a simple playlstyle for their roles. Even then, when you're given **eight different champs a week** chances are you can find one you like, and it isn't just ripped away instantly. When Braum was free I got him to Mastery rank 4, without even owning him. When that week ended I wasn't super determined to get Braum, I was like, "Well he's fun". > I know that, that's what I said. Your not guaranteed a certain time frame to gain enough IP. It's honestly sort of random. Except for it not really random, if you're lv20 playing bot games it'll take a long time, if you're playing norms it'll take a bit depending on how much you play. You say that last part trying to make the game sound like it's decaying, when they change it, it'll be changed, hopefully better. You're pointlessly trying to make Riot sound worse than they are. They're pumping out content and reworks/updates as fast as possible to keep the game relevant. Not that they need constant changes to stay relevant, but they want the game to feel like a 21st century game, and updating is part of that. They're pumping out content at an incredibly fast rate, and the quality isn't taking much of a hit from that. Regardless of what you're gonna pull out of thin air on this one, the game feels better than it used to.
: > [{quoted}](name=Kuroi86,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Xa3LXvGN,comment-id=001000000002000000000000,timestamp=2016-05-14T02:31:38.355+0000) > > That is the hitch when you play a free to play game. Riot still have to make money, hence most of the content being purchasable via cash. But on the other hand, they offer a way for you to earn every champ for free. No it's not easy, it's not meant to be easy, it's supposed to be rewarding. > > Say you try out {{champion:119}} on free week and you have a blast with him. Yes you're going to have to grind it out to save up the IP in order to purchase him, but the moment you do, the satisfaction of being able to play him whenever you want and mastering him is incredibly worth it. "Riot still have to make money". That's a bullshit excuse and you know it. Dota 2 is completely free, giving access to all heros, yet still somehow manages to make literally millions from the game solely from cosmetics. Where's the hitch there? Oh wait there is none. And let's be honest here, no one buys IP, Riot makes it money from people paying money for RP, which there is no way to earn other then paying. There's nothing rewarding about grind, it's for artificial game time increase. It's called grind for a reason. How will I grind the IP though if I'm forced to play new champs I have no idea how to play? I will most likely lose, vastly decreasing my IP. And what If i fall in love with another champ? Then I need to grind for two champs. But what if another rotation comes and I fall in love with yet a third champ? See how this turns into a vicious cycle that leads no where? And that's not even touching on the runes or rune pages (which some argue can turn into a p2w factor since runes do indeed give advantages over those with no runes), which cost a hefty 6300 IP.
The thing about Dota 2 is that they're owned by an already successful company that makes a lot of it's money from other games, same thing with Overwatch. In the case of Riot, they -currently- only have League, and gotta live off of this one game, so they open as many opportunities as possible to gain money, whether that's greed or not is personal thought. Do you think Riot doesn't get money from cosmetics as well? Ok, all these points are covered by one thing that one needs to know for life in general, adaptability. If you can't adapt and at least kind of like _one of the ten champions free each week_ then I think we might have a problem. You play them, you learn them, you like them, and save up for them. It's not like you don't have alot of time to play with them, you do. I got to mastery rank 4 with Braum in a free week, didn't even own him. I saved up 6300 hype to get him, then decided to get Kench instead. The good thing about free weeks is that it forces diversability from new players, which is a good thing for all players to have. It's not like someone is gonna be completely torn between three champions for a long time until they get them, it never gets that "vicious". It leads perfectly into being more diverse in different play styles in fact. I played Wukong and loved him, wanted him so bad, last time I played him was forever ago. You're pointlessly trying to make it sound worse than it is. In Dota you're allowed to be a one trick pony from the start, and then you only know your champion, in League you know a decent bit about other champions by the time you find your main group.
Psi21 (NA)
: Overwatch, Battleborn and Lawbreakers... I don't know having lots of fun with Battleborn so far
Well I just got Rocket League, setting this game on the back burner, but still playing it. :p
: > [{quoted}](name=MrNuclearPumpkin,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Xa3LXvGN,comment-id=00100000,timestamp=2016-05-13T18:05:52.286+0000) > > But that's the thing my friend. At the moment we think we're done with it. We have a new game to play. A new love. A bright and shiny love. New gameplay! New people! Oooh! This is certainly better. But eventually. Overwatch will get old. The games will feel stale and they'll eventually lose their hype. And you know what'll be there waiting for you? League. Lmao, overwatch get stale? Yea right, especially considering Blizzard plans to expand upon the game and add content after launch FOR FREE. Won't have to shell out 6300 ip just to get a new champ ( or is it 7000 these days?) Only thing getting stale is league with frustrating matchmaking and some of the worst balance this season
Ok, you're saying that getting credits from playing a game isn't considered free? If you're given the option to all 136~ champions then it's easy to get overwhelmed. If you're forced to play the game to get other champions then that, along with free weeks, paces you really well. Also, if you can't save up 7300~ (forgot exact number) for a new champ then that means you don't play a lot at all lol. Focus less on the ip you earn and you earn it much faster.
: You're not quitting League.
My friend said he'd be quitting league, stopped playing for about 2 months. Recently I'v been getting him to play a bit more, then the other night he wanted me to play a game with him.
Sqkerg (NA)
: 10/10 good troll
: When you have no gender but everyone calls you "He"
It's the same as saying "Man" or "Mankind". "Man" just refers to humans, "He" is basically "Man".
: I just saw the Tristana splash updates
I can't tell whether guerrilla warfare Trist is a reference too the hunger games or not, could I get a conformation or thoughts please? :D
: Uhm... no. Shouldn't it be the other way around? Fiddlesticks is a scarecrow which means they should be enemies. Since when are scarecrows friends with crows? they arent they scare them.
Since Fiddles literally summons crows in two different abilities :p
: That is an overstatement. People make Tyler out to be this constant rager. Some games he doesn't chat anything, some games he's actually encouraging, some games he's too focused on his own play. And, in some games he's just passive aggressive rather than straight salty or hating.
Ok, fine, I used a hyperbole to prove my point, sorry on that. Regardless though, the way he presented him self and acted just spoke out rager. It's hard to find one of his videos on YouTube where he's not talking shit or raging. It's generally one or the other, neither being good for the environment of the game. My only problem with passive aggressive is that many times I see it as just as bad, it's an awkward state where both sides are secretly hating each other and can't say it, a state of staleness. Sure, some games he doesn't type in chat, but because he's recording people can still see what he's saying. If someone of your team just made a bad play and you pm your duo partner or talk trash out of game then it's generally ok. But if you do that while recording people can see you shit talking, and what they can see is what matters. Dunno, his good games to bad is like (let's say) Meteos' bad to good. A bucket of water in a wildfire doesn't do much.
SloPro11 (EUNE)
: I wouldn't call myself a fanboy but I just enjoyed his streams because they were actually fun to watch, even if he is toxic. I don't like watching some nerd Meteos playing the game like he was deaf and not interacting with viewers and being toxic, it's just not for me. Well, now that he and gross gore are gone... bye twitch.
> I don't like watching some nerd Meteos playing the game like he was deaf and not interacting with viewers and being toxic Meteos interacts a fair amount with the chat/donations lol. Please, do tell me how he was playing like he was deaf, I'm waiting. This'll be fun, give me all the times that Meteos has been toxic, now, give me all times Tyler1 has been toxic.
Fovere (NA)
: As far as I know, Tyler hasn't shown a single unsportsmanlike conduct in any LCS matches either. So by your logic he's good to go.
Sorry, tell me where he said LCS is the only place you can get punished for being unsportsmanlike.
: From what I seen, Draven is toxic on stream, not on chat. He'll type stuff like XD but in stream calls his support trash. As well that people will troll the guy just to get a reaction out of him.
I'll just assume by Draven you meant Tyler1. Yes, he's toxic on stream, but that's toxic nonetheless. Instead of him talking crap in chat he can talk crap on stream, just another method. > As well that people will troll the guy just to get a reaction out of him. But that's the thing, if you let someone you don't know on the internet get to you then that's a problem you yourself have to fix. If they're trolling report them for it and move on, don't give them what they want.
: > [{quoted}](name=KOC rule,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=LfJJKtQa,comment-id=00040000000100000000,timestamp=2016-05-01T02:23:16.035+0000) > > Not arguing with you, but every single one of Tyler's games are worse than that lmao I know, I think it's absurd that they are calling out for a Meteos ban. Don't get me wrong, what Meteos said was not right at all, but one instance like this is not permaban worthy.
Yea, it's questionable as to whether that needs a punishment or not, one bad game doesn't mean a bad player. A set of some 19 bans (maybe accounts) on the other hand.
: https://mobile.twitter.com/Prototype_Vayne/status/718529484509421569 May not work since I'm on my phone but this is what every Tyler1 supporter is quoting.
Not arguing with you, but every single one of Tyler's games are worse than that lmao
: Meanwhile In Top Lane… [Weekly roundup - Apr 29]
Even though this seems to be a page with not many comments or up votes, thank you guys. At the end of every week this is my favorite thing to come on to the boards and see, a little snip-it of things that happened this week, many of which I missed myself. So even though these weekly roundups never look popular, thank you.
: Incarnation was banned for over a year tho (maybe more, I forget). Honestly Kacytron and Meteos should get similar treatment soon if they don't shape up.
Sorry, I was wondering, what has Meteos done? All I know of was him saying he didn't want any tyler1 fans to be his fans.
: "never abuses them in game chat or on stream" *you're a shitty player* *your dad never loved you*
So Meteos can be toxic at times, that's true for everyone. Tyler1 on the other hand, is almost always toxic. If not always toxic.
: shhhh https://mobile.twitter.com/Prototype_Vayne/status/718529484509421569/photo/1
Oh no, you found one game that Meteos was annoyed. Do we need to go through and point out all the evidence-on multiple occasions- that tyler1 has been toxic? I'v watched about 3 of his videos and in _every single one he's toxic._ If needed I can watch more and point out his toxicity in every single one, not to mention his games during his streams (never tuned in because I can't respect toxic players), and I don't wanna know anything behind the scenes.
: You're ignorant if you don't realize how much money RIOT (and now Tencent) brings in from LoL. Between in game purchases and LCS they are making more money than they know what to do with. Yes, the game is free to download and play, but I'm willing to bet a large majority of the player base has spent money on league at some point.
He never said that Riot doesn't make money from League. He said that it's your choice whether you want to give them money or not.
: What do you call a Braum supporting an Aurelion Sol
Dang, I was expecting Star Guardian.
Dextix LT (EUNE)
: Because they change their splashes once every 2 years or so. If you manage the game by all of the global considerations you will have what ammounts to censorship soon. Lets say the game gets popular in the middle east. What then? Will every female character get a burka gglobaly? Just because one country dictates it? They do not release new splashes often enough that their argument would hold weight. They could easily have different splashes for every region. Alas, greed is the only thing they know.
Sure, there will be some censorship, but it won't dictate the entire game. No, maybe some specific cases will get changed (not into wearing a burka) slightly. Ok, they've been releasing alot more new splashes recently to try and update them, that's the point. Check the last patch, a bunch of splashes were releases then by the update team, and they've said it's their intention to go through and update a ton more. Tell me, how _the fuck_ is this greed?
Uiraya (NA)
: That is optimism to the point of naivety.
How so? His argument (Riot's reasoning) makes perfect sense. "It's easier to manage a global game when we're all on the same page"
Ratbert (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=KOC rule,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=57KGaW40,comment-id=000a0001000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-24T01:13:29.186+0000) > tbh, elo boosting is pretty useless past gold lmao, if they're bad players then there's no point in elo boosting, they'll fall back into their rank eventually, hopefully realizing their play needs work. Yeah you know what happens during that fall? It hits 4 other players. That's also assuming they play ranked after the boost anyways. You can just decay and get a free skin at the end, one that they don't deserve. Not to mention, they wouldn't want to get boosted if they wanted to improve naturally.
If they don't play ranked after getting boosted then does it even matter that they are in that league?
ZeeWolfZ (NA)
: Fine, I'll give you a proper Argument. Negatives: * Players ranging from silver experiencing 8+ min queue times. * Solo Queue players do not play ranked anymore. * High Elo players can go from 15-40 min queue times. * Pressing 'FIll' = 99% Support role * Pro players waiting up to 90 minutes for a Queue to be faced vs 4 man premades due to lack of players in High Elo. * Elo Boosting service is provided on TWITCH without consequences while Rioters watch * Bronze/silver last season accounts are comfortably sitting at High Plat/Diamond 5 elos (Easy Elo Boosting) * Select/Pick/Ban process takes 6 minutes and at times Longer Positives: * You can rank with your friends * You can elo boost your friends without consequences Please, try to obtain a real rank before trying to argue about Ranked System.
Ok, I know Silver players aren't getting 8 minute queue times lol, sure, they happen on occasion, a rare occasion. Except for SoloQ players _do_ play ranked, they are the ones pitching a fit about it. Once again, crazy queue times happen on occasion, and they were still long last season. Yes, this is true, and the less and less people pick support the more that happens. Not saying you're lying on this one, but I need a reference to believe it. tbh, elo boosting is pretty useless past gold lmao, if they're bad players then there's no point in elo boosting, they'll fall back into their rank eventually, hopefully realizing their play needs work. Yes, believe it or not people require time to think about their choices Remember all the people at the start of the season excited about this? This is a huge positive from them Sorry, are you scared that a bronzie can beat you in an argument? Read my last response to you if you're looking for an answer to that.
ZeeWolfZ (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Zyorhist,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=57KGaW40,comment-id=000a,timestamp=2016-04-23T20:32:57.912+0000) > > I don't understand what all the hate is about. I play with/against premades all the time and from time to time I get invited into one. Its easy if you just don't go into it ASSUMING they are out to get you. Most players just want to play to win, and you can win a multitude of ways, its just important go work to build a strategy. If I notice that I'm queued with a 4 man premade I just ask what their team comp is gonna look like and try to play to compliment it. The issue starts in higher elo. About 32% of league players are in Bronze, so it doesn't affect you since you are in that Elo. Whlile it effects high elo because there are very limited amount of players. Not every person has 2-4 diamond friends who would like to Queue with the for premade, in fact most high elos are Solo Queues. We don't have 20mil+ Players in our elo, you do. > Most players just want to play to win, and you can win a multitude of ways, its just important go work to build a strategy. How would you know, you haven't even hit a Competitive Rank.
Oh man, same guy same shit, w/e. You never answered what the problem was, simply stating that it was a problem at higher elos. You said that there were less players, adn somehow that is a problem. He said that he worked together with people and it worked. > How would you know, you haven't even hit a Competitive round. Ok, this logic is so flawed it's disgusting, I don't have to say anything for people to realized that fact. "Most players just want to play to win", understandable, and true for ranked players (since you're using this as an argument). "you haven't even hit a competitive round", just, please think about that. You know what competitive players what to do? _Win_ Please, try and make a real argument in your response.
: can't elaborate don't have time must work i don't live at daddy and mommy house like you, gotta pay the bills, grow up dude.
Hold one, now you'r trying to be defensive after talking all this bad shit? w/e man, you're not worth my time. You have no points in your arguments, your insults are bad, and I'm getting tired of reading bad writing.
Helmight (NA)
: This is true. So far however, I've only ever gotten skins for champions that I already have multiple skins for, and whom I usually play quite a bit. Could be that I'm VERY lucky, as I've mentioned before, but I feel like there might be some algorithm behind crafting.
Yea, I guess we just have had different experiences. :p
Kirurgo (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=HotSauceInMyBag,realm=NA,application-id=cIfEodbz,discussion-id=5KAv8lHf,comment-id=,timestamp=2016-04-21T15:34:45.494+0000) > > I hate GP. His rework is amazing but I don't like the character itself and I really don't play melee champions so I don't like Gangplank. But am I very happy to get free skins? Yes. This system works just fine and I'm really happy riot implemented it. There was no obligation for them to do so but they did it anyway and it's very fun & rewarding. GJ rito "there was no obligation for them to do so" They did it so you have to spend $600 trying to get hextech annie. Yeah, you get free stuff potentially but they didn't make this out of the kindness of their hearts. If they introduced this and it didn't have any free skin element to it then people would feel pretty ripped off I think.
Reread your comment, wanna here the biggest flaw? > have They're not making you, you don _have_ to do anything. It's an active choice you make. You can still (to my knowledge) get Hextech annie randomly without gems. That and you can stack up gems overtime, a long time granted, but in time.
: The idea was nice. The implementation is flawed. They key:chest ratio is clearly off, and it's off in the wrong direction (more chests than keys) which is quite frustrating. It feels bad to be arbitrarily gated by RNG. It would have made far more sense for keys to drop more frequently than they currently do, so that you run out of chests first. That way, better players feel good about being able to "keep up" while players who earn more keys than chests have something to strive for (mastering new champions for an S). It makes the gating feature something that is somewhat under the player's control, and gives a sense of ownership. Instead, we have people sitting on chests unable to open them because RNJesus exponentially slows your key drops over time. It's badly designed and feels like a cash grab to get people to buy keys. Basically it feels like Riot found a new way to sell mystery chests at a higher price and make you think you like it, and it feels awful.
Honestly, it looks like overtime you will get more keys than chests, that's what's happening to me. Slowly, sure, but surely.
Helmight (NA)
: I had an Azir-only smurf that I checked specifically when chests came out that I got a Galactic Azir from. Seems like the system actually makes an effort to give you skins for content that you use. Or maybe I've just gotten very lucky.
Prob the latter lmao. I don't (not at the time, I do now) own Ezreal and got Pulsfire from combining three shards. Not that I'm complaining, just stating there's prob not many factors that influence the system. :p
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: and another victory for me thanks.
Would you care to elaborate? Or do you need to look that up real quick? Maybe mommy or daddy could help you with that.
shyv (NA)
: but it's not the same as the old one, therefore it is new
That's why what I said is my interpretation. :p
shyv (NA)
: ??? what was the point of this comment it's a new jungle item on the PBE
He's trying to reference [Madred's bloodrazer](http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/Madred's_Bloodrazor), that item from a long while ago. That'd be my best guess.
: you've stopped yourself from doing something more important gg i won
Lmao, nice 3rd grade response. All you're proving now is that you have no comebacks. You're just making bad responses to a losing argument. Also, I hope you just realized you called yourself unimportant, I don't have to talk and you'll just roast yourself instead of me. You've proved once again you have no argument, nice one.
: you don't worth my time you just arguing for the sake of it witch is clearly a low IQ who need to boost his confidence and ego by trying to win an online debate poor soul :(
Sorry, and you're worth my time for throwing out bad insults and calling me dumb while having bad spelling? I was trying to test if you had a real argument, and all you're doing by doing this is proving to me _you don't._ It's fine though, I know you're young and someday you'll -hopefully- be able to create a real argument where I have to kinda think about it. Tell me, what's the difference between an online debate and a real one? Like, if you wanna back up whatever it is you're saying I encourage you to go for it, it is good to challenge yourself when young. I'd also recommend having someone else help you with this to check your writing. Because right now you need some help with punctuation and capitalization, that's one thing easy to spot in a 2 second analysis. Don't worry, if I were gonna boost my confidence I'd go to someone else on the boards and have a real conversation with them, cause they can back up what they're saying. All of what you're saying is hollow, you try and throw out insults because it is the last thing you can do. How about this, you see me as a bad guy, like the Joker right? Then come and defeat me, don't let me use you as a platform to boost my confidence. Don't like what I'm doing or saying? _Then stop me._
ZeeWolfZ (NA)
: > If I wanted to be a higher rank all I'd have to do is climb and try a bit harder at the game, hello? That goes for (almost) anyone in the lower ranks. You've been bronze every season. Even if you tried you'd be bronze. This is your skill level, none wrong with it. Just accept you are what you are. Bronze. > Also, if Diamond III are that good then they should be able to win against a Silver regardless of the circumstances. Wrong. Diamonds or any high elo go into normals to fool around. Drunk, high, tired, or just want to fool/troll around. They are not playing at a Diamond level where their concentration has to be at 100%, they are in Normals queued with unranked to their rank or higher. High elo doesn't bring their mains into normals, that defeats the purpose of them trying to have actual relaxing time.
So you cared to look into my past of playing almost no ranked games a season, kudos. Even doing that you're wrong lmao, I was Silver one of the seasons :p. Could I climb out? Yea, definitely, if you want me to "try" I can and I will come back to this post at the end of the season as Gold. That's a thing I can 100% guarantee you I can make happen if I want. If needed I can save this post and come back when I'v hit Gold. Ok, this might be a more extreme example, but we're gonna run with it anyway. Last night I tuned into Hai's stream right when it was starting up. Later on in the night him and a few others went as a dynamic 5 for fun. In one of those games Dyrus went Nami toplane and won with it. Was he tired? Yea. Sure, he was a former pro, but they were against a 5 man somewhere around the same level. You can use the excuse of him being a former pro and a challenger (I believe) tier now, but let me remind you he ran **Nami toplane**. Also, just because they go into normals doesn't mean that they just go brain dead and don't at least try a little bit. Sure, they can be under one of the circumstances you mentioned, but in the high case I'd assume they'd prob just be sitting on the couch staring at the ceiling rather than playing a game. ofc they can lose sometimes, but considering them compared to the way you talked yourself up I'd assume that they'd be pretty good.
Show more

KOC rule

Level 30 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion