: Why is Guardian the only ROLE-EXCLUSIVE keystone?
I dunno about that; interactions with bone plating might complicate things. That said, I do agree that solo laners should have some way to utilize it.
: the same day you put this post , riot's boards website shut down for like 2 hours .. what do u call this ???
> [{quoted}](name=BEST MEAT BALLS,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=adGvr4t4,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-07-19T17:44:51.283+0000) > > the same day you put this post , riot's boards website shut down for like 2 hours .. what do u call this ??? The biggest fucking coincidence I've ever seen O_O I just about had a heart attack when I saw that blank screen...
Ąkąli (NA)
: So With All of The Reverts They Have Done on the Trash Mini-Reworks...
They’re planning on doing a VGU for him at some point.
Rioter Comments
Anin777 (EUW)
: So why not hop on PBE and try it yourself? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
> so unbelievably few games > only been played and played against by a relative handful of people > an environment that is already incredibly constrained by its minute population Does that tell you why? It’s not going to prove anything.
: I am actually baffled that there are people still trying to bring up any kind of excuse for blatantly busted champions. I remember the release Zoe where a sizeable portion of players insisted that "she was fine". Riot had to Olaf her form months as soon as she hit competitive. Now she's playable again, but she's still utter cancer. // Akali "obscured" mechanic shouldn't be in the game, period. There is no amount of "time after release" that is needed. Looks broken on paper and it's broken in reality. Make it standard stealth and call it a day. Only THEN we wait out for her to be released and balance her.
If you look really, _really_ hard at my comment, you might notice that **I never once defended the new Akali**. I was only pointing out the very low logistical credibility of the OP. There have been loads of instances where the Boards have been dead wrong about a champion’s brokenness. For example, Pyke was immediately called out on release for his execute and adding to damage and mobility creep. Now he’s praised as one of the most balanced assassins ever made. If the Boards were wrong once, who says they won’t be again?
: Just played Akali - Here are my thoughts:
I'm sorry, but you are the absolute last person I would give credibility to. You have played _so_ unbelievably few games of a champion that has _only been played and played against by a relative_ **_handful_** _of people_ _**in an environment that is already incredibly constrained by its minute population.**_ I'm sorry, but the cards are pretty stacked against you. Why can't the Boards wait two weeks for a champion to come out and at least one more for people to get used to them?
Rioter Comments
Amorith (NA)
: For anyone who was wondering how bullshit "True Stealth" is...
Except... of course... the second she tries to attack you, she procs the fountain aggro and dies instantly... yep... pretty OP...
: alternatively they could remove path bound stat boosts entirely and do a rework for starting items like they already planned at some point.
They decided against those plans, but it might do well for us to try to get the idea revived.
: NO SIDEBOOB
{{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}} In all seriousness, how do you feel about the new splash? Or do you plan on making a separate post for that?
Rioter Comments
: There was nothing wrong with the last Runes + mastery system
You really like cherry-picking, don’t you? Riot gave *plenty* of other reasons, namely the fact that, aside from Keystones and maybe Dangerous Game and Insight, they were uninteresting and unimpactful. The stats were so insignificant that they only ever felt like they were doing something when you were making pages. Besides, you *completely* forgot to mention the rune grind. The countless hours many people spent to get meaningless stat boosts when they could’ve been getting champions. I forgot to change my runes for about a month and ended up taking tier 2 attack speed marks and quints on Vel’Koz. I didn’t notice anything in the slightest, nor did I when I did not buy a single tier 3 rune. So yeah, the old systems might’ve been more “diverse”, but at least this one actually feels like it’s a part of the game.
Kraysis (NA)
: u just said you weren't going to argue lmao
I said that I wasn't going to argue about whether or not rune bonuses should be removed. Don't try to turn my own logic around on me; if you wanted to insult my intelligence, you could've just done it to my face instead of trying to be clever about it.
: The boards is a place for discussion. It isn't discussion if nobody replies.
Please tell me how on earth I was asking for a reply. I only meant to poke my head in and let people know that this fact was a thing and then leave. If that wasn't obvious, I don't know what to tell you.
: I genuinely don't understand how I came off as antagonistic. I was honestly just trying to state what I see wrong with Riot's reasoning behind the stats.
> [{quoted}](name=Khristophoros,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=7auEjnJi,comment-id=000200000000000000000000,timestamp=2018-07-15T19:32:15.727+0000) > > I genuinely don't understand how I came off as antagonistic. I was honestly just trying to state what I see wrong with Riot's reasoning behind the stats. Y’know what? I think I totally chose the wrong word. I was in the right direction, but I veered off at the last second. “Argumentative” would’ve been better. > [{quoted}](name=Khristophoros,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=7auEjnJi,comment-id=0002000000000001,timestamp=2018-07-15T19:29:57.857+0000) > > I was kinda saying yes Riot said that but here's what's wrong with what they said. > > So yeah I didn't mean to come off as arguing at you. Even if you only meant to expand upon an idea that utilized the facts I had given, you still made an ardent effort to make a point, and hit “reply”, thus meaning your comment was made in direct response to mine. You explained your stance in a passionate manner, but I wasn’t asking or challenging anybody to do so. I made a point of saying that I didn’t have an opinion myself. That should’ve implied that I was a bystander that didn’t want to get involved, but nonetheless wanted to make sure all the facts were present. You, however, chose to press your views on me. You had to make the conscious choice to hit “reply”. You knew I would get a notification. You knew that it would all imply that you were talking directly to me. Knowing all that, don’t act like you didn’t start this.
Ahpe (NA)
: What you got in mind?
Way back when new runes were still in production, they actually made reference to wanting new starting items, but later dropped it in favor of the tree combination stats. Here's the post: https://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/news/riot-games/editorial/runes-reforged-world-around-runes
Ahpe (NA)
: Bro chill he was just adding to your point lmao. No one is trynna argue here.
He wasn’t adding to my point because there wasn’t one. I was just stating fact. I don’t like people exploiting what I say to make their own points. I was just trying to carry over some facts to help stoke the conversation. If the person that replied to me had wanted to make their point while making reference to the facts that I brought in, they should’ve made a separate comment. However, the fact that they hit “reply” and use such an antagonistic tone in a comment that is implicitly directed towards me shows that they either thought I was trying to defend Riot or just didn’t think it through.
: They did say this I think, but it doesn't hold up if you compare how the old runes were used with how these stats are gained. Being able to adjust armor/mr with both flat and scaling options was really important in the old system. They took all that away and gave us a much less flexible system. Now the stats you get are tied to the runes you choose so it does not serve the same role as the old system. It's just some extra stats you barely get any choice about. The stats only serve to nudge certain champs towards/away from certain runes, therefore the purpose of these stats is to constrain our strategic options, which is the exact opposite of the old runes. Just remove them.
Don’t know why you replied to me; I made a point of saying that I wasn’t going to argue.
Ahpe (NA)
: How about we just remove the passive stats off Rune Pages?
Don't quote me on this, but I'm pretty sure it was said at one point that the reason that these things exist in the first place was to compensate for the loss of stats that came with stream-lining the Runes and Masteries systems. I'm not saying anything either way on the topic of whether they should be removed, but I thought I'd just drop that little tidbit in.
F1TZKY (OCE)
: This guy has single handedly drove league into the ground, have you not noticed that league has gotten progressively worse over the years? The game peaked in 2014-2015 then Ghostcrawler joined and now the game is dying. I know a few friends who are long time veterans of WOW and the shit they have told me that Ghostcrawler did to WOW is absurd, this guy has no idea how to balance PVP. He either never plays the games he works on or he's just a massive idiot. Either way as long as he stays with Riot the game is never going to get better.
You missed the point entirely. You are free to think what you want, but you are insulting the intelligence of everyone on these boards by saying that there is no possible reasoning that anyone could have for liking the game in its current state. People have different likes and dislikes, so get over yourself and understand that what you’re stating isn’t fact; it’s your opinion. Regardless of whether Ghostcrawler is destroying the game or not (regardless of the permformance of any employee in any profession, really), if you’re not their employer, you’re being an asshole if you’re telling them to quit because you think they stink. Now, if the job was detrimental to the employee’s physical or mental health, it would be a different story as you would legitimately be trying to help them. However you have not only chosen to shit-talk this guy right to his face, but also have the audacity to say that you’re “not trying to be an asshole”. You can think the state of the game is absolutely horrible and complain to Riot as much as you please; I don’t care, that’s your prerogative. However, I can’t see how anybody doesn’t draw the line at personal attacks (outside of politics, of course).
: Anyone miss the 35-minute games?
Not really, considering my games tend to average ~30 minutes.
F1TZKY (OCE)
: Everyone that plays WOW wholeheartedly agrees that while you were working with Blizzard you ruined it, everyone who plays League of Legends wholeheartedly agrees that you are ruining League of Legends. Stop working with Riot please, I'm not trying to be an asshole I just want to enjoy playing the game I love and don't want it destroyed by someone who has no idea what they are doing.
You’re very generous with the term “everyone”, you know that? Also, asking him to quit? Calling him a failure? Yeah, you’re not being an asshole at all...
mileco (NA)
: When you or someone in your premade party earns any S rank, you'll acquire a chest.
Oh, I see, it must've been the guy I was duo-ing with. I didn't see who got the S; I just saw the yellow text in the post-game chat and clicked out since something came up and I needed to notify my friend of it. Thanks for the assist!
Rioter Comments
: Negativity towards the State of the Game goes far beyond the boards.
The reason a lot of people come on the internet to talk about League is to complain. If they were satisfied, then they wouldn’t have a reason to complain. This means that a whole bunch of voices are lost whenever one group is satisfied. This makes way for those who want the opposite of those who were initially complaining to flood the forums. In addition, since many of those who are now satisfied aren’t here, this allows for those with the opposing opinions to go mostly unopposed, or else the posts are upvoted too quickly for those opposed to react. Therefore, there is no way to tell the majority on these forums. If this is so, then it’s no wonder why Riot doesn’t listen or at least takes everything with a grain of salt. It’s not that the forums are never satisfied; whenever one group gets what they want, another one pops up.
: Soulbringer Aatrox
I think you kept too much of the base model. I hate to be that guy, but outside of the head, sword, left hand, and feet, it looks too much like a re-color to me.
Voldymort (EUNE)
: >...and that’s the problem. i think your problem is that most people don't share your opinion
You missed the entire point of the post. I want to help you out, but you’ll have to explain what you see beforehand.
Rioter Comments
: Old School LoL
From Riot’s mouth: > We looked at doing this recently for a series of internal playtests, because we wanted to experience first-hand whether things like pacing or counterplay felt very different a few years ago. Unfortunately, we weren’t able to easily get the older builds running because so much of the game content and code has changed. We can’t just pull in old data and expect the current game engine to play nice with it all. We could almost certainly make it work if we had a bunch of smart engineers working to make it happen, but then those engineers would not be working on other features that might be more valuable to you guys in the long run. Likewise, we could have designers create versions of existing champs that tried to mimic the old data (Season Two abilities, items, tuning, etc.) but that’s a mountain of work for something that might only be fun for a few games or so. In other words, the opportunity cost of that work is probably pretty expensive. So philosophically, we aren’t opposed to playing an older version of LoL, and it might be fun for a short period of time (because we might very well discover that the reasons we made all of the Season Three, Four, and Five changes still exist), but there is a good chance it’s not worth the development effort that it would take.
Madsin25 (NA)
: Dude we have a voting system for a reason. Posts that say ADCs are bad and useless get downvoted into oblivion. Posts that say damage is high get massive upvotes to the top of the page. You act like every complaint automatically gets 100 upvotes so we can't tell what the problem is.
That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying that, since many people only come here to complain, the amount of people who would normally oppose a given complaint has drastically decreased to the point where a post that would've been left with 0 upvotes a month ago would make it to the front page before anyone noticed. Since a given complaint has been satisfied and therefore is no longer advocated for, a new group has arisen that is not satisfied and is therefore more vocal. I'd like to apologize for the ADC bit as I did mean to say "later on" instead of "now". I'm usually extremely careful with my wording. Also, don't act like even 100 upvotes means a damn thing in a community this big. That's 100 people in a sea of millions who happen to share one opinion.
: Riot, damage is too high across the board. Do you not read these boards?
Oh, they hear you, but that doesn’t mean they’ll do what you say. Remember when everybody was asking for ADCs to be gutted? Well, that happened, and now we have a bunch of complaints about useless ADCs. Of course, I’m not claiming that the Boards are one entity; in fact, the fact that it’s not is the problem. The reason a lot of people come to the Boards is to complain. This means that the Boards loose a whole bunch of voices whenever one group is satisfied. This makes way for those who want the opposite of those who were complaining to flood the Boards. In addition, since many those who are now satisfied aren’t here, this allows for those with the opposing opinions to go mostly unopposed. Therefore, there is no way to tell the majority on the Boards.
: > [{quoted}](name=Kairoptra,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=gG0O75nw,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-07-08T16:29:57.865+0000) > > Comprehensive list of all Kai'Sa nerfs: > > 8.6 - W AP Ratio reduced from 65% to 45% > > 8.6 (Hotfix) - Base AD reduced from 65 to 63 > Mana Cost increased from 45 to 55 > > 8.8 - Base Health Regeneration reduced from 6.2 to 5.5 > Health Regeneration Growth reduced from 0.75 to 0.55 > Q Bonus AD Ratio reduced from 40% to 30% > > 8.9 - Q Upgraded Missiles Fired reduced from 12 to 10 > Missile Damage flagged as AoE in all cases (counting this as a nerf since AoE gains reduced effects from certain spells effects) > E Bonus Attack Speed Duration reduced from 5 seconds to 4 > Runaan's Hurricane bolts no longer grant E's cooldown reduction > > 8.10 - Base Armor reduced from 33.04 to 28 > Base Health Regeneration reduced from 5.5 to 3.5 > Base AD reduced from 63 to 59 > > 8.11 (Hotfix) - Passive Plasma Base Damage changed from 7 - 12 (based on level) to 4 - 10 (based on level) > Passive Plasma Per-Stack Base Damage reduced from 1 - 9 (based on level) to 1 - 5 (based on level) > Passive Plasma AP Ratio reduced from 20% - 40% (based on Plasma stacks) to 10% - 20% (based on level) > > https://imgur.com/a/atmYjOu and yet the pros still spam play her and consistently are not just getting fed with her but destroying with her. check it out yourself if you dont believe. Clearly Broken or it wouldnt be spam played in Master/Challenger.
Right, because if a group that composes less than 1% of players happens to find it broken, that means no other data matters. Sounds about right.
: Who balances this game seriously?
Comprehensive list of all Kai'Sa nerfs: 8.6 - W AP Ratio reduced from 65% to 45% 8.6 (Hotfix) - Base AD reduced from 65 to 63 Mana Cost increased from 45 to 55 8.8 - Base Health Regeneration reduced from 6.2 to 5.5 Health Regeneration Growth reduced from 0.75 to 0.55 Q Bonus AD Ratio reduced from 40% to 30% 8.9 - Q Upgraded Missiles Fired reduced from 12 to 10 Missile Damage flagged as AoE in all cases (counting this as a nerf since AoE gains reduced effects from certain spells effects) E Bonus Attack Speed Duration reduced from 5 seconds to 4 Runaan's Hurricane bolts no longer grant E's cooldown reduction 8.10 - Base Armor reduced from 33.04 to 28 Base Health Regeneration reduced from 5.5 to 3.5 Base AD reduced from 63 to 59 8.11 (Hotfix) - Passive Plasma Base Damage changed from 7 - 12 (based on level) to 4 - 10 (based on level) Passive Plasma Per-Stack Base Damage reduced from 1 - 9 (based on level) to 1 - 5 (based on level) Passive Plasma AP Ratio reduced from 20% - 40% (based on Plasma stacks) to 10% - 20% (based on level) https://imgur.com/a/atmYjOu
: > [{quoted}](name=Quinzley,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=gG0O75nw,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-07-08T15:17:07.160+0000) > > People who don't need to play to balance the game. Funny thing is RIOTs logic fails hard in the real world. By their logic you don't need to be a qualified surgeon to give life saving survey to someone.
Wrong logic; it's that you don't have to know how to perform surgery in order to build the tools and machines involved with surgery. The surgeon tells you what kind of instruments they need, so you build them. If they're not to the surgeon's liking, you receive feedback and edit your design. Of course, it would always be helpful to know how to perform surgery when making these things, but it's not necessary. All you need are parameters for what the tools need to be capable of.
: So my URF teammate asked me to swap and take his Soraka, and I agreed...
{{sticker:sg-ahri-1}} ... I need to see this replay
Teémò (NA)
: "she was a victim of mansplaining." Oh man it's vid con and gamergate controversy all over again.. {{sticker:sg-janna}}
> [{quoted}](name=Teémò,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=BAoBlyNZ,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-07-07T02:39:22.288+0000) > > "she was a victim of mansplaining." Oh man it's vid con and gamergate controversy all over again.. {{sticker:sg-janna}} Can’t say I know about that incident. Care to give a quick summary?
: The point of that was is that we can't make them do anything My whole point over all is what is the point of going out of our way to be nice to riot if they aren't going to change. It's up to riot to take the first step forward. No one is going to go out of their way to get someone's attention if they know they'll just be ignored, so why let the frustration build up and keep slamming our heads into a brick wall trying to get riots attention rather then vent it out with through the boards On a bit of a side note I've always thought there should be a boards section meant for venting, that would probably help the problem, but once again, as far as I know at least, that's up to riot to do that
Firstly, I'd like to say that your addition to my analogy has no bearing; it's established that Riot's shit at listening to us. I never said otherwise (in fact, I said otherwise in bold AND caps); the point of the analogy was to try to put you in Riot's shoes. Also, allow me to clarify something: "nice" is not what I'm asking for. All I'm asking is that we just try to get our opinions out without all this fluff so that Riot doesn't have to wade through all the bullshit. Not only would we have a chance at persuading Riot to listen, but they could also take in information more quickly. Finally, I'd like to say that your point about "why be nice when they aren't gonna listen?" can be flipped right around. Why put the unnecessary stress on yourself when it's not going to amount to anything? If people can't deal with their anger in a constructive manner, that's their problem, not Riot's.
: Using your analogy it more like complimenting your worker for doing a good job but then they start slacking off but you keep encouraging them, but then they start slacking off even more, So you try to give them some help but they just ignore you, but you can't fire them because their dad is your boss so you take out your frustration on them. It's not really the right thing to do but no one blames you because they get frustrated by the slacker too and the slacker doesn't care because they know you can't actually do anything about it. There are still people who do very thought out posts and tell me, how many of them get a response from riot? Not to say this is the best way to go about it but what's the point of going out of your way if it doesn't change any thing?
I gotta say, you had me and you lost me with that first part. I might VERY dumb, but as soon as you got to the part with “but you can't fire them because their dad is your boss”, it just became incoherent. Please explain, because I am legitimately confused. As for the last part, the idea I’m trying to get across is that if we want Riot to feel motivated to interact with us, we need to have a welcoming and professional environment. If two diplomats meet for a discussion on international relations between the two countries they represent, it is better for relations if both sides are frank with one another, but at the same time not agonizing. If that is the standard, then surely it can only benefit us. Even if Riot continues to not listen, then at least we can try to better the attitude of the community. Besides, what are you trying to say? That if being nice didn’t work, they’ll listen if we get mean? What kind of logic is that? They’re not toddlers; they’re a company that relies on PR reports. Things went from “people are saying X” to “people are saying X, but louder and angrier”. You can shout something as loud as you want, but it’s still going to be the same message.
: and anivia and zac?
Well, they're technically still alive, since you have to go through a health bar. I imagine it would work the same as Sion.
: I can only wonder what the name of that emote will be. EDIT: I have similar issues as ADC where my support tries to poke and then gets engaged on instead and I can't possibly help.
Danjeng (NA)
: Riot listens to community!
This. This is why Riot doesn’t want to listen to the Boards. This is why Gameplay is a joke. Can you maybe shitpost in M&G or at least GD? Riot doesn't take you seriously because you've allowed yourself to devolve into this. If they didn't listen to you before, do you honestly think that this will make them change their mind? Let's beak it down(**_I'd like to make a point of saying that this is a REASON; I'm am NOT trying to provide an EXCUSE. Riot SHOULD LISTEN more, but I'm trying to help you understand THEIR POSITION._**): Say you're working for some business. You started out alright, but for one reason or another you start just legitimately sucking at it. So what does your boss do? Does he dock your pay? No. Does he fire you? No. Does he reprimand you at all? Yes; he constantly berates you, calling you worthless and completely inadequate, hanging over your shoulder, ready to blast you with sarcasm at every turn. What would you do in this scenario? I think it would be obvious that you should quit. If this is the kind of thing that is okay to your boss, then clearly you shouldn't be working for him. You're your own person and are more than capable of finding a means of living that does not involve verbal and emotional abuse. This, of course, is where the analogy falls apart, since Riot chooses to stick with the game in spite of this horrendous community. The reasoning for this could be any number of things, but that's not the point. The point is that just because you shouldn't be doing a shitty job for this long in the first place, doesn't mean it's suddenly okay for a community to be like this. If you want Riot to take you seriously, then act like it; be a mature human being and explain your position without all the sarcasm, insults, unkind memes, and unnecessary profanity. What would people think if Riot was like this to its players? They would be called immature, unprofessional, and overall childish. I can guarantee you they wouldn't be as successful as they are. Riot may be doing a crappy job as a company, but I gotta say that you're doing a pretty shit job yourself in trying to give feedback.
Danjeng (NA)
: Riot listens to community!
The thing is, it's not really more damage since it's in the same slot. I'm not vouching for Riot, but ultimately you're just picking which avenue/amount of damage you take. I agree that they need to nerf damage to bring it down to a level where it's even with other rewards. However, the only problem they're really adding to is low diversity of runes. Champions aren't going to be dealing more damage, but rather can just pick which route they want to go for the same outcome: Damage. Besides, Eyeball Collection is still clearly superior as it rewards you for what you would do anyway: Getting takedowns. You don't need to put forth the effort to deny enemy vision or really put yourself more at risk than you usually would, like the others demand. Zombie Ward will synergize quite well with assassins who build Duskblade, but also making them trade in free AD for some one-time burst that might not even be that good as it does hinder your scaling for something you might not even be able to properly utilize from behind. Ghost Poro also provides too significant risk for its reward; really, I see this as a cheese rune for junglers looking to level 1 invade. Besides, it falls off too hard if you get behind; if you're turtling and are waiting for a good team fight to push back, you're not going to be using those adaptive stats very often, as opposed to the far more reliable Eyeball Collection. I think involving more risk is definitely a step in the right direction for Domination, but if they want the other two runes to stack up (which they're on their way to doing), they need to at least bring Eyeball Collection down to meet them.
: You think he would take this over free ad? I really think people are trying to grab anything to try and get zed nerfed, cuz this makes no sense.
I agree that it’s still inferior, but the way you made it sound, it seemed as if you didn’t know about the changes.
Pentapod (NA)
: The Next Champion Roadmap?
The only info we have is that it’ll be released after the Akali rework, and presumably have information on the Nunu rework, as well as the next new champion and rework, obviously.
AmazoX (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Kairoptra,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=XoNareIo,comment-id=00070000,timestamp=2018-07-04T16:51:30.069+0000) > > Zombie Ward changes on PBE make it so that your next attack after kill a ward, and it no longer extends the duration of the wards you put down. Naturally, as a Duskblade builder, he will easily be able to clear wards with Blackout, while the damage he gains would add onto the already potent damage from its other passive, Nighstalker. It's too ward reliant to be better than Eyeball.
Yeah, like the new Ghost Poro, it just falls off way to hard when your behind. All in all, Eyeball Collection is just more reliable and takes less effort because the best way to stack it is to do what you would’ve been doin anyway: Getting Takedowns.
SatomiKun (EUW)
: Wait, what? Zombie Ward does no longer spawn ... well.... **Zombie Wards**???? For real? I thought the extra damage is just an addition and not a replacement.
Well, it does, but only for wards you kill. It doesn’t turn the wards you place into them when they expire, though.
AmazoX (EUW)
: This is ridiculous, A Zed never takes Zombie ward, it's too badly suited for him.
Zombie Ward changes on PBE make it so that your next attack after kill a ward, and it no longer extends the duration of the wards you put down. Naturally, as a Duskblade builder, he will easily be able to clear wards with Blackout, while the damage he gains would add onto the already potent damage from its other passive, Nighstalker.
: Why would he ever take zombie ward?
Zombie Ward changes on PBE make it so that your next attack after kill a ward, and it no longer extends the duration of the wards you put down. Naturally, as a Duskblade builder, he will easily be able to clear wards with Blackout, while the damage he gains would add onto the already potent damage from its other passive, Nighstalker.
: What is left other than shitposting about these shitty designers? Are we all forgetting who is responsible for how garbage this game is right now? I don't want them to listen. They all disqualify themselves every single patch, every single quick madmans thoughts, every single forum post of ghostcrawler back in the day. I want them to get fired so league might still have a future.
I’ve seen plenty of your comments and posts, and here’s my advice: quit for your sake. You can only blame your frustration at the devs so much for your negativity; I think at this point it can only be said that you’re just a hateful person. I mean, you didn’t post such a negative reply that somehow tries to justify what was clearly a shitpost that wasn’t meant to be taken seriously because you were coming off of a bad game. You did it because you feel like it. Let me break it down for you: If your outlook on the game is so bleak that the only avenue to success that you see is firing integral people and starting over with people who haven’t worked on it at all before due to your burning hatred toward Riot, which you feel the necessity to post about online regularly, don’t you think that says something about you? Wouldn’t you want to remove such a big cause of your negativity? Are you a masochist or something? If the only thing you find any reason to post on here is your hate (and no, I don’t just mean “hate” as I’m complaints; I mean legit, actual hate), then why do you continue?
Show more

Kairoptra

Level 70 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion