: Low priority queue and queue dodge penalties are completely separate.
> [{quoted}](name=RavenHusky,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=cK6EsZ30,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2015-08-21T20:35:05.841+0000) > > Low priority queue and queue dodge penalties are completely separate. thanks
Rioter Comments
Fritterz (NA)
: So you think giving me a game with poros and blitz makes me forget about how mad I am about morde???
> [{quoted}](name=Fritterz,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=B63BVfqw,comment-id=,timestamp=2015-08-20T19:10:50.486+0000) > > Well you're right. WP GG > > Who is Morde? I am morde. yayaya
: He writes down your IGN and you lose your season rewards. Could make for great parody.
> [{quoted}](name=Rav Abaddon,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=gYnE3Gn6,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2015-08-21T19:01:45.019+0000) > > He writes down your IGN and you lose your season rewards. Could make for great parody. this has great potential. i almost guarantee there will be a parody of lyte and death note sometime soon
Rioter Comments
Jikker (NA)
: I've run out of books to read
> [{quoted}](name=Jikker,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=A4MpbQ1E,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2015-08-16T20:38:01.461+0000) > > I've run out of books to read same here have read all books in library of congress and every wikipedia article. GG
Phunbaba (NA)
: Stop posting anime.
> [{quoted}](name=Phunbaba,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=8Rw1run6,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2015-08-02T18:12:38.911+0000) > > Stop posting anime. yeah get that shit OUTTA HERE
Zastie (NA)
: I only can tell it's GP because of the orange and barrel. Otherwise it looks like some beefy dwarf.
> [{quoted}](name=Zastie,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=hXR0K8Ed,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2015-08-02T18:20:18.397+0000) > > I only can tell it's GP because of the orange and barrel. Otherwise it looks like some beefy dwarf. this.
Dasdi96 (NA)
: The problem with vayne isn't her w.
: More unrealistic standards http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20150706235235/villains/images/f/f8/Blazblue_Azrael-concept-artwork1.jpg And before someone claims its a male power fantasy, this exists. http://store.broccoli.co.jp/ec/img/m/0400000139982_1.jpg
> [{quoted}](name=Arcus Diabolus,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HwGoNJRu,comment-id=0018,timestamp=2015-07-31T21:00:14.546+0000) > > More unrealistic standards > > http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20150706235235/villains/images/f/f8/Blazblue_Azrael-concept-artwork1.jpg > > And before someone claims its a male power fantasy, this exists. > > http://store.broccoli.co.jp/ec/img/m/0400000139982_1.jpg that booby pad is for gay guys or ultra weeb girls. maybe both
: > [{quoted}](name=Kim Jong Oom,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HwGoNJRu,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2015-07-31T18:56:00.503+0000) > > If males want to be buff hunks cuz women find that hot shouldn't women want to be sexy since dudes find that hot. Logic = none Thing is I don't think that's the reasoning. I think the reasoning is we supposedly want to be in shape like that simply because it would be awesome to be that strong and such. From what I understand, it's a self-image thing and to an extent that makes a certain amount of sense. I mean think about it: by and large you don't hear guys being told they're perfect as they are, whereas body and self-acceptance has been something heard and seen far more commonly in things geared towards women. Fashion alone is a good example, I think. What comprises fashion for guys? What's good for us to wear? Well, if the media is to be believed....anything, really. Throw a pair of shorts and a t-shirt on and you're good to go! Rules of dressing well, color-coordination, accessories, guys who don't know about such things appear to largely either be left out in the cold or left to learn for themselves. Meanwhile there's entire TV shows, magazines, websites, and other widely-known and seen resources dedicated to showing women who supposedly don't know how to dress how to do so. I mean c'mon...you think the whole 'Fedoralord'/'Nice Guy' thing would have been so easily identified if the guys in question had realized or been taught about how shitty it looks to throw on a trilby or a fedora along with regular street clothes? I don't see a lot of stuff saying that bigger or taller men are accepted, or that we as men in general should be comfortable with ourselves regardless of body-shape. It SEEMS like that's more of a message geared towards women, when in reality both sides could probably use it. Granted, that's not to say that it's TOTALLY okay to be overweight. It's not okay to be 500+ lbs. That's just a health-risk plain and simple. But it's never quite been stressed to us as a gender as it has to women (at least recently. I know for a long, long time body-acceptance wasn't the norm.) despite the fact that, man or woman, we could all stand to be a little more comfortable inside our own skin and none of us should be chasing an ideal physique that we'll never achieve or for the wrong reasons. We don't have that kind of acceptance-based message going for us quite as strongly as women do, so, if the theory is correct and guys enjoy playing as buff guys because they want to BE buff guys, the logic holds water. It's not a fantasy for the woman, it's a fantasy for US because we'd like to be that way for whatever personal reasons we have, and the message to accept ourselves regardless of how we look isn't as prevalent for our gender as it is (again, if only recently. I know things weren't always like this.) for women. Taken in that context, if that's the logic, it's actually pretty one-sided. Frankly, the women I've known in my life, including the ones I've dated, have been pretty open-minded. They have their own attractions just like we all do, but their preferences seem a little more nuanced or based on personality characteristics in tandem with, or as an acceptable replacement of a certain amount of, attractive physical qualities. I've known women who would look at those images and go 'Take me now, please!' and some who would go 'Eh, too much bulk for me.' I've also known some that would reply with 'if he looks like THAT and he's a nice and interesting guy? sign me up!' This is just my observations of course, but it seems like women have a bit more of a sexual/attraction scale than 'are you a boob-man or an ass-man?' Yes, we're talking in HUGE, GIGANTIC stereotypes here, but such things do largely have a grain of truth somewhere within them and I'm mainly using them to get my point across (hopefully.) Men can be thoughtful, women can be shallow, we're all people at the end of the day. But in terms of this logic that the chiseled male physique in media/gaming is NOT meant for women? Given society today and what I've seen, I can see where it may be a valid argument.
> [{quoted}](name=Sadistic Cheese,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HwGoNJRu,comment-id=000500000000,timestamp=2015-07-31T19:36:05.706+0000) > Yes, we're talking in HUGE, GIGANTIC stereotypes here, but such things do largely have a grain of truth somewhere within them and I'm mainly using them to get my point across (hopefully.) Men can be thoughtful, women can be shallow, we're all people at the end of the day. But in terms of this logic that the chiseled male physique in media/gaming is NOT meant for women? Given society today and what I've seen, I can see where it may be a valid argument. I like how you negate the entire point of your convoluted argument by saying you are using gigantic stereotypes. If I were to use your own argument against you I would say "different people have different tastes. guys I know would look at a busty woman and say "id fuck that" some might say they don't like massive udders". Men aren't inherently born wanting to look like the next hulk hogan. Women probably aren't born wanting to look like kim kardashian. I could write you an identical essay outlining the male equivalent of what you wrote, but I won't because my point is self evident. There are two sides to every coin.
: Feminists complained about Bayonetta, but tbh I think she falls into female power fantasy more than sex object for male. http://static1.gamespot.com/uploads/original/123/1239113/2694711-bayonetta.jpg ^She aint even that great looking. WOMEN think she looks good, but men don't. (or at least I don't) Bayonetta is what women think of as sexy and powerful. It's their fantasy. Feminists complain about there not being enough strong, independent female protagonists in video games, and when they finally get one, they still complain. Maybe that's why video games tend not to cater to their tastes. Because they're never happy.
> [{quoted}](name=FlynnOFlenniken,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HwGoNJRu,comment-id=000e,timestamp=2015-07-31T19:35:59.653+0000) > > Feminists complained about Bayonetta, but tbh I think she falls into female power fantasy more than sex object for male. > > http://static1.gamespot.com/uploads/original/123/1239113/2694711-bayonetta.jpg > > ^She aint even that great looking. WOMEN think she looks good, but men don't. (or at least I don't) > > Bayonetta is what women think of as sexy and powerful. It's their fantasy. > > Feminists complain about there not being enough strong, independent women protagonists in video games, and when they finally get one, they still complain. > > Maybe that's why video games tend not to cater to their tastes. Because they're never happy. bayonetta used to look like PALIN for christs sake
: O.o and every single one of those dudes except Zangeit is obtainable in a year or 2 with hard work. so not that unrealistic.
> [{quoted}](name=Feannas,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HwGoNJRu,comment-id=000b,timestamp=2015-07-31T19:00:34.081+0000) > > O.o and every single one of those dudes except Zangeit is obtainable in a year or 2 with hard work. so not that unrealistic. And it's easy for a woman to cut the ice cream and sweet cakes for a year or two and achieve the female equivalent amirite :^). Also if your bicep is bigger than your entire face, something is up.
: From what I've heard the counter to this argument is that being buff like that is a male fantasy too. Not so much that we want to do them, but that we want to be like that, so it's...somehow different. I'm not entirely sure how that argument holds water, but it apparently does in some regard. I suppose I can see where it's valid but I dunno...kinda confuses me. I just wanna know who actually, really, honestly has the standard that if a woman doesn't look like Miss Fortune or Sona in terms of body-shape that woman is clearly undatable or ugly or something. Who the hell are these people? Do they even exist? Why has no one kicked them in the nuts repeatedly and explained to them that there's a difference between drawings and real life? It really makes no sense to me at all. Who in the world has these standards and how do they have more than two brain-cells and enough wherewithal to actually function in the world?
> [{quoted}](name=Sadistic Cheese,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HwGoNJRu,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2015-07-31T18:30:57.578+0000) > > From what I've heard the counter to this argument is that being buff like that is a male fantasy too. Not so much that we want to do them, but that we want to be like that, so it's...somehow different. I'm not entirely sure how that argument holds water, but it apparently does in some regard. I suppose I can see where it's valid but I dunno...kinda confuses me. > > I just wanna know who actually, really, honestly has the standard that if a woman doesn't look like Miss Fortune or Sona in terms of body-shape that woman is clearly undatable or ugly or something. Who the hell are these people? Do they even exist? Why has no one kicked them in the nuts repeatedly and explained to them that there's a difference between drawings and real life? It really makes no sense to me at all. Who in the world has these standards and how do they have more than two brain-cells and enough wherewithal to actually function in the world? If males want to be buff hunks cuz women find that hot shouldn't women want to be sexy since dudes find that hot. Logic = none
F03 (NA)
: anybody here make it into the tree of savior beta test?
: Characters like that (read: most unrealistic depictions of dudes) aren't designed to be pleasing to women. They're designed as a male power fantasy.
> [{quoted}](name=Social Justice 1,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HwGoNJRu,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2015-07-31T18:27:09.233+0000) > > Characters like that (read: most unrealistic depictions of dudes) aren't designed to be pleasing to women. They're designed as a male power fantasy. name checks out
: http://ddragon.leagueoflegends.com/cdn/img/champion/splash/Urgot_2.jpg
> [{quoted}](name=Twin Arrowguns,realm=EUW,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=HwGoNJRu,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2015-07-31T18:23:43.987+0000) > > http://ddragon.leagueoflegends.com/cdn/img/champion/splash/Urgot_2.jpg I just knew i would get memed :^)
Rioter Comments
: Are you going to listen to your community about Fiora's new VU? I highly reccomend you do.
Riot doesn't give a shit about you guys, after all anyone with complaints on their forums is just a "vocal minority".
Racks (EUNE)
: why do nondiamonds+ even bother posting when they're low elo for a reason?
: Doran's shield should block more from ranged spells/basic attacks
It blocks 8 damage BEFORE calculating resistances... dear god...
: For your consideration GD
: TODAY IN AMERICA
Meanwhile in the east people are getting executed, shot by terrorists, living in a state of fear. But hey at least it's interesting amirite
Arduno (NA)
: Just make a strawpoll? http://strawpoll.me/ mehehehehe
> [{quoted}](name=Arduno,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=vmQyIQbt,comment-id=000e,timestamp=2015-07-19T04:02:56.147+0000) > > Just make a strawpoll? > > http://strawpoll.me/ > > mehehehehe then how are people supposed to enter their own choices?
: Pantheons not garbage... he's just hard to pick-up... like seriously, You can still outlane most champions Out poke most champions. But the moment you get ganked, you're fucked.
> [{quoted}](name=ZenithEevee,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=jZtZEaXu,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2015-07-19T03:50:29.662+0000) > > Pantheons not garbage... > > he's just hard to pick-up... > > like seriously, You can still outlane most champions > > Out poke most champions. > > But the moment you get ganked, you're fucked. I play panth. His laning isn't all that good unless you are vs someone who doesnt know how to itemize. His poke costs too much mana to be effective, not to mention low range.
: so my mom says i am not allowed to have a girlfriend until the age of consent (18)
She doesnt want to have to pay child support for her grandkids too soon
: I hope they piss on your pizza and burn it too.
> [{quoted}](name=ZombeezyJeezy,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=vmQyIQbt,comment-id=000a,timestamp=2015-07-19T03:59:10.082+0000) > > I hope they piss on your pizza and burn it too. ill still have that delivered to your house
Visys (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=M Schumacher,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=vmQyIQbt,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2015-07-19T03:48:17.781+0000) > > Pepperoni Why was this upvoted 4 times but the post above it downvoted?
> [{quoted}](name=Visys,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=vmQyIQbt,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2015-07-19T03:50:01.140+0000) > > Why was this upvoted 4 times but the post above it downvoted? cuz he is european
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=ZombeezyJeezy,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=vmQyIQbt,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2015-07-19T03:53:14.569+0000) > > I'll have that delivered to your house
Norscout (NA)
: Norscout's Message To GD
Gd's response https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hwfr3zwv1Y
Rioter Comments
: If ranked isn't for climbing, there's no mode that is.
Climbing is the result of you being able to demonstrate your learning. You don't climb by not getting better. Thus, the objective of playing ranked shouldn't be to climb, but to get better. Sure your team might lose while you won your lane, but you should think of it as a win as long as you learned something from it.
: How do people play ugly champions?
Why does littleboy ezreal post on GD? Does he enjoy giving us eye and brain cancer with his shitposts?
Rioter Comments
: Can we please have towers that can resist backdoors.
I legit haven't seen a tower full health get backdoored in 2 seasons
Atuko (NA)
: How old are you guys?
Old enough to kill someone. Not old enough to drink beer.
: I would invest all my money, and try to prevent 9/11.
> [{quoted}](name=Furi Kuri,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=OvptvaGE,comment-id=0009,timestamp=2015-07-18T01:35:23.424+0000) > > I would invest all my money, and try to prevent 9/11. Some other tragedy would happen. The US needs a reason to get all that yummy oil in the East somehow.
: Let me take this apart piece by piece. >She is one of the most annoying champions to lane against just because of her stupid 2 second stun. Her stun isn't 2 seconds until max rank, and nobody maxes Equilibrium Strike first. Laning phase doesn't last long enough for her stun to reach 2 seconds (Level 13). The highest it gets is 1.25 seconds during laning phase (Level 8). Riot makes cc scale up towards mid/late game because you need longer crowd control during team fights, but you don't want to lane against a 2 second crowd control effect because it'd be unfair to trade against. So Riot sets cc at about 1 second during laning phase (some champions even as low as .5 seconds). > She outdamages any champion full-ap/ad champion with just Tri Force and builds full tank. She doesn't out damage **any** champion, or even most for that matter. Riven and Cho'gath are prime examples. Both of them easily win the lane against Irelia, and out damage/out scale her late game. For squishy champions (ADCs and APCs), it seems like she "out damages" them because they're too busy trying to escape to fight, and because they're too squishy (unlike Irelia) to stand there. Her gapcloser and stun make it to where they need to escape melee range before they can think about fighting. That's what a mechanic called "kiting" is used for. She can easily be kited due to the considerably long cooldown on Bladesurge. That's why she's given a long slow/stun; so that she can at least stand a chance against kiting. In other words, she doesn't out damage any ADC or APC, she's just tankier. If kited properly, an ADC or APC can beat her. > Snowballs way hard. If you get killed by an Irelia there is no coming back. Not true at all. If you play properly and farm properly, you'll come back pretty quickly. If you get killed a second time, however, of course you'll get snowballed. By that point, you've already lost a considerable amount of cs and gave her 578g in kills. That's why you **PROPERLY** tower hug, and make sure to just last ht whatever minions you can at a safe distance. You'll come out of lane behind, but at least she won't be too fed. > Impossible to duel because of her stun. Her low cooldown and high duration stun makes her almost impossible to duel. Umm... First off, most of the champions in the current meta have crowd control, some of which are better than Irelia's. To name a few, Riven, Zac, Cho'gath, Sion, and Gnar. Her stun also has the average cooldown of a stun, 8 seconds. And to make it worse, it doesn't scale down by leveling it. Throughout the entire game, it's 8 seconds without Cooldown Reduction. As well, again, the stun is only 1 second and 1.25 at level 8. It's not that long of a duration, especially with the current meta. > True damage and sustain, targetted dash, etc. Her ultimate has almost no cooldown. Let's go back to the current meta ramble I was on about. Cho'gath has a true damage ult and immense sustain with his passive, and his ult cooldown is only 80 seconds. Zac has % max health sustain that is pretty high and annoying to deal with, especially in lane, and his ult is a large amount of crowd control which gives him a movement speed bonus and 36% of his max health regenerated (if you properly pick up the blobs), the cooldown being 130/115/100. Riven has a shield that scales off of her main stat and two ultimates that output an immense amount of damage, and her ult cooldown is 110/80/50 seconds. Gnar's passive regens a large portion of his health, and his ult gives him two extremely long duration crowd control effects, with a cooldown of 120/110/80 seconds. Irelia's ult doesn't put out a large amount of damage, but gives her back 25% of the damage output by the ult, with a cooldown of 70/60/50. You may be thinking, "This just proves my point!" No. Her ult is weak compared to all of the meta champions. You heal about 300 health, big deal when you're getting wrecked by a Riven shield and ult; crowd controled by Zac who's healing a % of his maximum health and dealing damage at the same time; knocked up, then silenced, then eaten by a Cho'gath; stunned three times in a row and being out damaged by a Gnar. Her ult is extremely weak in comparison to toplaners of the current meta. > Her passive gives immense power in teamfights. This is true. > She can straight dive to your carries and delete them. No she can't. If your team is playing how they're supposed to play (2 tanks in front, bruiser in middle, APC and ADC in back), the tanks can at least get a slow off, giving the carries time to back up, which allows the bruiser to peel them off while one of the tanks comes up to completely peel off the carries, meanwhile the carries should be kiting properly. > So when will Riot nerf this champion? Not anytime soon. She's perfectly balanced for the current meta. Get good.
> [{quoted}](name=Fae the Eevee,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=vsAQJA5E,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2015-07-17T20:44:38.277+0000) > > Let me take this apart piece by piece. > > Her stun isn't 2 seconds until max rank, and nobody maxes Equilibrium Strike first. Laning phase doesn't last long enough for her stun to reach 2 seconds (Level 13). The highest it gets is 1.25 seconds during laning phase (Level 8). > Riot makes cc scale up towards mid/late game because you need longer crowd control during team fights, but you don't want to lane against a 2 second crowd control effect because it'd be unfair to trade against. So Riot sets cc at about 1 second during laning phase (some champions even as low as .5 seconds). > > She doesn't out damage **any** champion, or even most for that matter. Riven and Cho'gath are prime examples. Both of them easily win the lane against Irelia, and out damage/out scale her late game. > For squishy champions (ADCs and APCs), it seems like she "out damages" them because they're too busy trying to escape to fight, and because they're too squishy (unlike Irelia) to stand there. Her gapcloser and stun make it to where they need to escape melee range before they can think about fighting. That's what a mechanic called "kiting" is used for. She can easily be kited due to the considerably long cooldown on Bladesurge. That's why she's given a long slow/stun; so that she can at least stand a chance against kiting. > In other words, she doesn't out damage any ADC or APC, she's just tankier. If kited properly, an ADC or APC can beat her. > > Not true at all. If you play properly and farm properly, you'll come back pretty quickly. If you get killed a second time, however, of course you'll get snowballed. By that point, you've already lost a considerable amount of cs and gave her 578g in kills. That's why you **PROPERLY** tower hug, and make sure to just last ht whatever minions you can at a safe distance. You'll come out of lane behind, but at least she won't be too fed. > > Umm... First off, most of the champions in the current meta have crowd control, some of which are better than Irelia's. To name a few, Riven, Zac, Cho'gath, Sion, and Gnar. Her stun also has the average cooldown of a stun, 8 seconds. And to make it worse, it doesn't scale down by leveling it. Throughout the entire game, it's 8 seconds without Cooldown Reduction. As well, again, the stun is only 1 second and 1.25 at level 8. It's not that long of a duration, especially with the current meta. > > Let's go back to the current meta ramble I was on about. Cho'gath has a true damage ult and immense sustain with his passive, and his ult cooldown is only 80 seconds. Zac has % max health sustain that is pretty high and annoying to deal with, especially in lane, and his ult is a large amount of crowd control which gives him a movement speed bonus and 36% of his max health regenerated (if you properly pick up the blobs), the cooldown being 130/115/100. Riven has a shield that scales off of her main stat and two ultimates that output an immense amount of damage, and her ult cooldown is 110/80/50 seconds. Gnar's passive regens a large portion of his health, and his ult gives him two extremely long duration crowd control effects, with a cooldown of 120/110/80 seconds. Irelia's ult doesn't put out a large amount of damage, but gives her back 25% of the damage output by the ult, with a cooldown of 70/60/50. > You may be thinking, "This just proves my point!" No. Her ult is weak compared to all of the meta champions. You heal about 300 health, big deal when you're getting wrecked by a Riven shield and ult; crowd controled by Zac who's healing a % of his maximum health and dealing damage at the same time; knocked up, then silenced, then eaten by a Cho'gath; stunned three times in a row and being out damaged by a Gnar. Her ult is extremely weak in comparison to toplaners of the current meta. > > This is true. > > No she can't. If your team is playing how they're supposed to play (2 tanks in front, bruiser in middle, APC and ADC in back), the tanks can at least get a slow off, giving the carries time to back up, which allows the bruiser to peel them off while one of the tanks comes up to completely peel off the carries, meanwhile the carries should be kiting properly. > > Not anytime soon. She's perfectly balanced for the current meta. Get good. Some people just don't think. Why bother explaining.
: If you know you're on tilt, DON'T PLAY RANKED.
Ranked is for learning not climbing. Climbing is a result of you learning. Maybe people just want to learn instead of goof off in normals.
Weizi (NA)
: What would you do if you were sent back to year 2,000 AD?
: ***
He has a PHD so that's Dr. Lyte to you. That's right he calls himself a Doctor.
: > [{quoted}](name=Im Annie Hastur,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=FqNi0vFb,comment-id=000600000001,timestamp=2015-07-16T20:47:32.020+0000) > > why are u leaving I don't like how my life is turning out, I'm making some changes.
> [{quoted}](name=I See Stars,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=FqNi0vFb,comment-id=0006000000010000,timestamp=2015-07-16T20:50:36.736+0000) > > I don't like how my life is turning out, I'm making some changes. That's great dude, I don't give a shit what you did in the past. I wish you good luck in your future non drop hacking endeavors.
: Why GD needs to die.
GD culture is the must absurd thing i ever heard of.
OhOkYeah (NA)
: How to get laid?
elliot rodgers. thatll get u laid real good
: > [{quoted}](name=Pershing,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=Xc6GONRR,comment-id=00130000,timestamp=2015-06-24T08:40:01.781+0000) > > Huh? He worded it stupidly, but he was trying to say (roughly): Japan Number 1?
> [{quoted}](name=Saigyouji Yuyuko,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=Xc6GONRR,comment-id=001300000000,timestamp=2015-06-24T11:25:28.319+0000) > > He worded it stupidly, but he was trying to say (roughly): > > Japan Number 1? ah thank you mr weeblord. :^) i dont know any japanese so i just did whatever came to mind
: So I'm in Japan at the moment
Interact (NA)
: Pax Sivir still attainable?
when riot needs more money you bet she will go on sale
: The End Times, The Final Chapter of GD.
The final chapter of GD? Thank god. The story of GD was awful and hurt to read
: That's Dr. Lyte the scientist to you... he actually calls himself a scientist :/
> [{quoted}](name=Cyrus Du Couteau,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=2vuiFVFw,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2015-06-15T07:09:14.284+0000) > > That's Dr. Lyte the scientist to you... he actually calls himself a scientist :/ IVE GOT A PHD. YOU GOT A PHD? NO?
: GD, I have to ask, before this place is gone forever
Show more

Kim Jong Oom

Level 91 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion