: Failed - File Incomplete
Same issue here. Haven't played League in 2 months, this was finally the day I could do it. First my client gets all borked, so I try to download it from scratch, and boom, failed download. Awesome.
: Please let us remake if the jungler doesn't have smite
They need to at least have a warning that says, "You are about to play jungle without Smite? Are you sure you want to do this?"
Windoges (NA)
: A little unrelated to the discussion, but what do you guys think about people not voting at all when your team tries to surrender? I'm not sure if it should be an automatic no or yes.
I think an abstain should be an abstain. If you don't vote, you don't care. And let surrender be simple majority. That way feeding troll duos can't hold a game hostage for 40 minutes. So with both abstentions and simple majority, If two people vote yes, one votes no, and two abstain, it should count as a surrender. Ties in this case would not surrender (2 yes, 2 no, 1 abstain for example).
: I don't know about that, but if someone AFKs, I should be able to leave the game without a leaverbuster penalty. I'll gladly take the LP lost if I can just get into another game without wasting 35 mins of my life.
Omg this. This this this. Let me take the loss and get on with my life.
Julanus (NA)
: Looking at some of your most played Champions, you might actually play a few champions you could utilize as Supports. For those you tend to play, I'd recommend trying out Poppy or Volibear. Potentially also Sejuani or Vi. {{champion:78}} Poppy's pretty decent at locking people down, and her W can also come in handy against a variety of champions. Some include.. Marksmen: {{champion:51}} {{champion:104}} {{champion:236}} {{champion:133}} {{champion:67}} (Potentially also {{champion:42}} {{champion:429}}(Hop and Ult?) {{champion:18}}) Supports: {{champion:12}}Headbutt {{champion:432}}Tunnel {{champion:201}}Protective leap toward an ally {{champion:89}}Zenith Blade {{champion:111}}Anchor {{champion:412}}Hook Roamers: {{champion:84}} {{champion:268}} {{champion:164}} {{champion:114}} {{champion:105}} {{champion:420}} {{champion:80}} {{champion:98}} {{champion:23}} {{champion:157}} (Potentially {{champion:54}} {{champion:57}}) Junglers: {{champion:266}} {{champion:32}} {{champion:131}} {{champion:427}}(Root) {{champion:24}} {{champion:64}} {{champion:76}} {{champion:56}} {{champion:107}} {{champion:102}} {{champion:254}} {{champion:154}} (After his rework {{champion:19}}) I may have missed a few, but a good majority of these tend to be played quite often. {{champion:106}} Volibear has decent damage, so he can cause a bit of pain to the enemy laners (enough to pressure them away at the very least). His passive can also be fairly useful for a couple reasons. One, it's a backup heal (duh), so you can stick around a bit longer. Two, it can be a way to encourage the enemy to use their resources (mana, summoner spells, etc) against you so your passive will proc (and go on cooldown). In cases like this, avoid whatever damage you can so your passive doesn't proc, and utilize the moments the enemy laners are unable to defend themselves. {{champion:113}} I don't own Sejuani, so I don't know as much about her as I wish. I do know she's got a nice plethora of CC abilities (CC is always handy), and she can be a powerful pick played as a Support. Just try a few Normals to see if she's someone you might be able to utilize as a Support. {{champion:254}} Okay, this one is gonna be more of a kill lane (you won't be supporting, per se). However, she can jump in, lock a person down, and reduce their armor for your Marksman. However, this is more of a niche option than a true Support pick. If you want to try out some other champions that might be more.. well received in the Support position, I might recommend trying out some of these. {{champion:12}} Alistar is a true CC tank. A knockup, knockback, and %damage reduction make this guy great for jumping into the fray. {{champion:57}} Though not quite as common as a Support, Maokai does provide some decent lockdown with his Q and W, area damage reduction, and even vision. He does tend to be a bit squishy early on, however, and his mana pool can be somewhat lacking if you're not careful. {{champion:412}} Thresh is just all-around useful. A hook, flay, and a box with extremely strong slow, he's got plenty of tools to use. Just remember, his autos are technically ranged, so trying to proc Relic Shield can be annoying. {{champion:80}} Another kill lane pick, Pantheon could be fun from time to time. Damage, a stun, and a bit of defense, he'll certainly cause the enemy pain.
Very well-thought out response. Thanks for taking the time to respond with good suggestions. I did play Sejuani support once ages ago and wrecked lane with it. She does have a lot in her kit that is good for that (tanky, knockup, slow, and a glorious ult). The only thing that isn't supporty about her abilities is her W. However, one of my biggest complaints about support champs is their lack of waveclear, which her W provides. I'll try it out. Thanks again.
xVirus (NA)
: Lel get good at sup then. And pls stop making it sound like you get autofilled all the time. I checked your op.gg match history as far as it had recorded. And from about 56 games you played as support twice (I counted). And for your overall games played, out of 71 games you played 6 poppy games and one 1 diana game. Assuming you are play jg/top you played 3 games of autofill out of 71 lmao. All these autofill complains are fkin pathetic and overexaggerated. And if you have time to play rank then use that time to play support or another role. Its not that hard to play sup or any other role at a decent level especially at lower elos. Also this is way better than the old pick order. Stop bichn and making pathetic excuses.
That's because I dodge most of the time I get supp, buddy.
Lupxel (EUW)
: Before New Draft Pick, it was completly random the role you would get, as the people above you would pick first. WAS IT BETTER? WAS IT? IF YOU WERE THE LAST PICK, WOULD YOU LEAVE CAUSE ITS "TOXIC"? Now you get the play the roles you want, but as the selfish you and everybody is, you can't think about something called Queue Time that would be way longer as nobody wants to "supp". So think about it as the following: the games you get autofilled are the ones in were the last pick. See? Its easier now, and you can stop making stupid posts.
In the old system, I had to play more roles, because pick order would frequently leave me last pick (translation: support). I played support roughly 20% of the time, because I was last pick 20% of the time. I was used to it. Now, I don't play support nearly as often, so when I do, I'm super rusty. Playing 1 support game in 10 is worse than playing it more frequently, because I'm no longer used to playing support. My original post was very clear on that matter, sorry if you couldn't glean that from my "stupid" post. If they're going to let us play the roles we want, don't ruin it with autofill. I'd gladly wait several more minutes to be guaranteed a game I will be able to play what I know and like.
MrHaZeYo (NA)
: So what your saying is; if you don't get what you want your just not going to do it? That's a pretty good lesson, you should teach it to your children. Your life must be awesome if you never have to do something you don't really want to do.
League of Legends is not a chore, a duty, or a promise. It is a game and a fun pastime, which is less fun due to autofill. Speaking of teaching, your own parents or teachers should teach you the difference between "your" and "you're." You'll pardon me if I don't take any other personal advice about raising a family from you either.
Too Ton (NA)
: Same as veigar stun wall... doesn't go away if he dies. Not sure if jarvan's wall stays too
The whole flavor of her ult is that it's an arena for her to engage in a 1v1. If you kill her or she leaves the arena, the arena should instantly go away, as she has been defeated (or tapped out).
: Because when a camille player is low (like me) the only way to win a dive (or just 1 for 1 kill) you under turret is to try to keep you in turret aggro as long as possible. Why would you dive someone and then complain that you got punished for it>
So the huge gap-closer/stun, free bs shield, ludicrous slow, and gobs of damage isn't enough, you also need your ult to hold people after you die?
: You can't build new item pages in the old client. I tried. Unless they've changed it in the last few weeks. I will try again now...
Yep, just checked again. You can create new pages, and you can even create subsections in the item set, but you cannot drag items over from the list into the sets. It is nonfunctional.
: For item sets relaunch the old client and make them there. Its still works in the new one. Just go to the login page and at the bottom will be a button called "launch legacy client"
You can't build new item pages in the old client. I tried. Unless they've changed it in the last few weeks. I will try again now...
: He didnt say you need to learn all the roles. Make support one of your 2.
If I make support one of my 2, I will only get placed support. I also hate playing support.
Sorcio84 (EUW)
: Learn to play supp as i need to learn to play mid, my worst lane. To deal with autofill, one must get versatility
You obviously didn't read my message, or you'd see that I already wrote why I don't think I should have to learn all the roles if role selection is a thing. And you will never, EVER get autofilled mid, my friend. Never seen it happen, and if it does by some fluke, I'm sure somebody will trade with you.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: I really like the client. BUT LET ME HIDE THE DAMN MOBILE USERS.
Considering their usual pace, Rito should get to this by about 2019.
Venteus (NA)
: New Reward for Filling
Better yet, make support a role people actually want to friggin' play.
Rioter Comments
: Alpha Client Item Sets
Please please please add back the item pages. I live and die (literally) by those pages.
: Can we have the summoner spells stay changed if someone dodges?
YES. Why do your rune pages stay, but summoners don't? While we're at it, if you are jungle, the game should either force you to take smite, or pop up the summoner icons so you have to pick. Once in a while I'll have a jungler who forgets smite because they selected it in a previous game that got disbanded. Sucks.
: Riot is adding a way to remake games due to afks. Lets thank them in this thread.
I'm not going to thank anybody, because it's ABOUT GODDAMN TIME. This should have been in the game years ago. YEARS AGO.
Rioter Comments
: I love playing support....but i'm done.
I hate that when I support, I can be 0/0/30, and if one of our lanes has superminions bearing down on us, I cannot clear the wave. I will literally die trying to kill a superminion and its accompanying minions unless one of my teammates is there to do it for me. That sucks. It's not fun. Let alone being 3-4 levels behind everybody else, having less gold than everybody else, and not getting any recognition for carrying our teammates who then carry the game. Making plays for my team is marginally fun... but nowhere near as fun as carrying myself. And so, now that I don't have to play support ever again, I won't. If you play support, the queue time is nonexistent, because nobody is playing the role and the demand for supports in games is huge. It should be painfully obvious to Riot that they need to make the support role more fun. Period.
Rioter Comments
: I am having a large amount of Ranked games failing to start today.
: Anyone else live in constant fear that their favorite champ is gonna get Nerfed or Reworked?
I'm not worried about a nerf or rework. I'm worried about my favorite champs getting buffed. Then they get put in ban prison and I can't play them anymore. Then they get gutted, and I don't WANT to play them anymore. It's happened to my mains three times now. The worst was Sejuani and the whole Cinderhulk double-nerf fiasco.
Rioter Comments
: Kick Smiteless "Junglers"
There's no need to fight over whether a jungler should or shouldn't have to take smite. I personally think you're stupid if you don't, but there's a simple fix: Require everybody to select their summoners fresh each game, immediately after picking your champion. You can't lock in your champ until you select your summoners. Done. I've forgotten to take smite a couple of times, and felt like an idiot. Or, I've accidentally kept smite on a laner simply because I jungle primarily. Often people will end up taking the wrong summoner simply because they're running on autopilot and it doesn't occur to them that they want heal now since they're going to be adc, not the teleport that they had from last game. It's a good way to force people to be mindful of the summoners they are selecting, and will drastically reduce, if not eliminated, people taking (or not taking) smite for their junglers or laners.
: Annie summon tibbers should be a projectile teddy bear monster that rips your fucking kidneys out.
When they announced that they were going to rework immobile mages, I hoped that they would do this exact thing to Annie. But nooo, they decided to rework Vel'Koz instead, who probably needs a rework less than almost any other champ.
: 3 say yes 2 say no . the game is waiting for you to get more angry . I think 3 should win it is the majority
Totally. This would stop the duo premades from holding games hostage after they feed bot lane and lose the game.
: if one person doesnt vote and the outcome is 3:1, it should be a surrender, and abstention shouldn't automatically count as a no, since a 3:1 is an absolutely clear majority
: YES! HOLY SHIT YES! I am SO sick of this when it's around a meal-time! "PAUSE YOUR GAME AND COME EAT!" "No, I can't!" "YES YOU CAN, GET YOUR ASS OUT HERE!" "It's an online game!" "So what? Get your ass out here!" - Every mealtime that I have a game running EVER. I get so sick of it.
Here's a novel thought... don't start a game close to meal time.
WykiLoki (NA)
: Suggestion: A ping for "Warded"
To some of the comments saying there should be two pings, one for "ward here please" and one for "this place has been warded by an enemy," I think you only need one. You can use other pings to be more specific. You can combine the "Ward here" ping. If you just ping that, then you're asking somebody to ward there. If you combine the ping with a "danger" ping right afterwards, you're saying there's an enemy ward there. If you want to know if a bush is warded, you could use a "ward here" ping followed by a "enemy missing" question mark ping. I'd love to see this ping in the game.
HayRoss (NA)
: Jungling in a nutshell
At least you can save three lanes. I routinely get a lane two kills, only to watch them lose lane and feed anyway... #Silverproblems
Lyte (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Maestro80,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=JNwgrzih,comment-id=004f00000001,timestamp=2015-11-05T14:12:54.596+0000) > > Wha-wha-what?! Isn't that saying "Believe us because we say so, not because of this proof we have sitting right here that you can't see." I've personally seen us post data before and have players say they don't believe it. So, I don't think data solves that issue.
> [{quoted}](name=Lyte,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=JNwgrzih,comment-id=004f000000010001,timestamp=2015-11-06T00:02:22.581+0000) > > I've personally seen us post data before and have players say they don't believe it. > > So, I don't think data solves that issue. Well, folks like that aren't going to believe anything you say, whether you have proof or not. The rest of us would probably find hard data very interesting. If you're going to be transparent, go whole hog!
ploki122 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Maestro80,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=JNwgrzih,comment-id=004f00000001,timestamp=2015-11-05T14:12:54.596+0000) > > Wha-wha-what?! Isn't that saying "Believe us because we say so, not because of this proof we have sitting right here that you can't see." It means they would rather convince you through logic and basically discuss the overall design that slap you in the face with 10k datarows.
> [{quoted}](name=ploki122,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=JNwgrzih,comment-id=004f000000010000,timestamp=2015-11-05T14:33:06.718+0000) > > It means they would rather convince you through logic and basically discuss the overall design that slap you in the face with 10k datarows. Why not both?
Lyte (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Guiotine,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=JNwgrzih,comment-id=004f,timestamp=2015-11-05T08:47:05.813+0000) > > Any chance we could get some data after the new queue is released? I don't even mean as a way for players to "police" how well the system is working, I'm just genuinely interested in things like current toxicity levels in champ select vs. toxicity levels in champ select after release, current happiness/enjoyment of ranked vs. happiness/enjoyment of ranked after release etc. Mostly things to compare current values to values after the new queue is released. > > I realize the answer is almost definitely "no", but I would still like to see that kind of data :/ Would love to, but generally don't like using data to try to convince players of something if we can help it.
> [{quoted}](name=Lyte,realm=NA,application-id=mNBeEEkI,discussion-id=JNwgrzih,comment-id=004f0000,timestamp=2015-11-05T08:54:48.693+0000) > > Would love to, but generally don't like using data to try to convince players of something if we can help it. Wha-wha-what?! Isn't that saying "Believe us because we say so, not because of this proof we have sitting right here that you can't see."
: Which Champions have you got pentakills with?
Just one for me so far, on Quinn. My friend got a penta with a support Zyra where his last kill came after she died from her passive. That was pretty cool.
: > [{quoted}](name=Maestro80,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=rWllWAlq,comment-id=000c,timestamp=2015-07-10T13:54:20.696+0000) > > Unfortunately, at my level of play, in the few games I've tried to go Devourer, all of my lanes lose before I can even get the damn item, and we surrender at 20 without me even seeing the completion of the item. > > I'd love to say we lose the game because I'm afk jungling and not helping my team, but honestly, I can't even play a champ who needs level 6 to gank well, because the game is lost by then. > > Maybe today I'll get a game in where I can actually try to see how OP this fucking item actually is. Get it on Xin and just constantly focus on ganking and clearing objectives.
: So who spiked the punch at Riots Live Balance team meetings?
Unfortunately, at my level of play, in the few games I've tried to go Devourer, all of my lanes lose before I can even get the damn item, and we surrender at 20 without me even seeing the completion of the item. I'd love to say we lose the game because I'm afk jungling and not helping my team, but honestly, I can't even play a champ who needs level 6 to gank well, because the game is lost by then. Maybe today I'll get a game in where I can actually try to see how OP this fucking item actually is.
: Best Cat Name? [Straw Poll link]
My sister's cat's name is Loki. It's very appropriate for him!
NemeBro (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Gavran,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Misd7NJf,comment-id=0008,timestamp=2015-05-23T04:54:41.855+0000) > > Now consider that people exist on these very boards who would also call X champion you think is pretty balanced "release Xin." > > QQers always make imbalance sound worse than it is, I imagine your brother in law is no different. Only the guy who wrote that Daemons codex outright admitted they were overpowered as shit. When asked about why the Daemons codex was so disproportionately strong, Mat Ward said,"It'd be a shame if they weren't." Guy's a fucking badass.
: You should look into getting banner of command over abyssal scepter
Abyssal Scepter is being reworked. Won't be out next patch, but probably the one following. All of this will be moot in a few weeks.
TauNoob1 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Sirsir94,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=sqo0EANO,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2015-05-01T13:25:47.101+0000) > > wait what happened? Riot bans toxic players from playing ranked and as a result most of them play draft. Basically its been flooded with ragers/toxic players since they made this decision.
As far as I understand it, if you receive ranked restrictions you have to play normal draft SPECIFICALLY to work toward un-restricting your account. It's not that the restricted jerks decide to play normal draft because it resembles ranked... it's that they HAVE to play it if they want to overcome their ranked restriction. And it sucks.
: I know, right? Why trash another mode just to clean up ranked? Normal draft was my favorite and the toxicity level went through the roof when they implemented ranked restrictions.
I'd like to hear from a Rioter why they thought it was a good idea to shunt all the badly behaved players into a single other mode.
: Meanwhile at draft pick..
I know, right? Why trash another mode just to clean up ranked? Normal draft was my favorite and the toxicity level went through the roof when they implemented ranked restrictions.
Sein (EUW)
: If there is one thing I learned in LoL, that is:
Hell yes. Played a bit Friday night and immediately remembered why I don't play on weekends anymore. Trolls, feeders, ragers galore.
: Hey Lornlynx, That is correct, there will be new keybindings so that you can have only certain spells be QuickCastWithIndicator and others be NormalCast/QuickCast. James
Will this be something you can quickly change in the top menu? (Much like how you can flip between normal cast and quick cast on your primary keys without having to dig deep into the key binding list)
Show more

Maestro80

Level 30 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion