Moody P (NA)
: VOLIBEAR ONLY RUNS AT YOU IN A STRAIGHT LINE VOLIBEAR WILL NEVER ADJUST HIS TRAJECTORY FROM POINT A TO POINT B BECAUSE IT'S ALL STATS THERE IS NO OUTPLAY IN THIS EQUATION, VOLIBEAR JUST RUNS AT ME AND WINS t. 0 volibear games
Except that is 100% factual. Hate it all you want, less mechanically intense champions take less mechanical skill to play. No skill doesn't refer to game sense or predictions or mind games or anything. People say no skill because of the champion's abysmally low skill ceiling. Obviously a pre-rework Warwick with double the CS of an Ekko or Kayn is a clear display of skill, but that skill is jungle pathing and general game knowledge. Pre-rework Warwick is still brain dead and him getting kills or even performing at both the most basic level/most advanced level (Nearly identical) does not display any sort of mechanical skill. Some champions you do have to play to understand their skill ceiling/skill floor, but not all. Voli, pre-rework Warwick, Yi, pre rework Nunu, Xin, Garen, etc. Anyone can look at their spell rotations/actions and understand those are just simple, beginner champions designed to be easy to handle. The downside is that they are not versatile, which is where the game knowledge aspect clicks for them. But in terms of raw user-handling skill, a pre-rework Warwick/Nunu/Voli could almost never take more skill to use than most of the rest of the roster, let alone advanced mechanical champions. That's why they exist though. Beginner, easy as shit champions are designed to teach new players the game and develop their game knowledge/sense. Once you get that down, then you move on to a champion that actually takes skill to handle and maneuver.
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=aY0AJGBY,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2017-06-12T13:55:22.228+0000) > > That's fine, I won't dodge lol. You're entitled to play any champ in any role. I'll just practice mechanics and try to win regardless. I wouldn't even report you, even if the button was available pre-match. I'll bet you flame non-stop you sanctimonious belly button sniffer.
Keshaun (NA)
: Assassin's Should NEVER Have A 100% Pick Rate
It’s funny because people think champions should be garbage if they lose lane. An assassin’s kit is designed to excel in 1v1. Even if you beat them in lane and have a gold lead, you need enough of a gold lead to trounce their natural advantage in kit to even begin to want to 1v1 them. Don’t complain that you can beat an assassin lane and still die to them when, at really no point in the game, should an assassin do poorly in most 1v1s. That’s called feast famine, and riot and most people dislike that style. Don’t ever look at an assassin and treat them as famine regardless of their score. They’re built for 1v1.
: The bug is that the cc is counting the duration of his Q as part of its time, when it shouldn't begin until he's finished. _Especially_ if it hits during that 0.25s window.
Well the CC landed technically, so regardless of what happens next, that CC will only last as long as it does. Like when Leblanc chains Zed, if he ults just right, he can bypass a lot of the duration because as soon as that cc procs, the duration clock begins regardless of zhonyas or untargetability or anything. I know it's different, but the concept is there. So it's not a bug, it's that the CC goes off in the tiny little cast time and then the timing starts, like it would in any scenario that the CC goes off. It's not a bug sadly. It's server reading time latency wise and the slightest cast time every spell has. It's why you can hit someone recalling right at the end but they still complete the recall. Best advice I can give is to not CC the second Yi gets into range because most Yi's Q as soon as possible.
: yi ignoring roots and stuns/getting out of them early
It's because you're rooting him at the exact second he begins his Q where there is the slightest delay before he goes untargetable. Think recalls. Ever have the case where someone is recalling, something damages them maybe .25 seconds before they recall yet it still goes through?
levilol102 (EUNE)
: i got report boted for saying idc after they sh1ttalked me :)
You can’t get banned for I don’t care. You said something else
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ZVgii0P6,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-03-14T14:44:07.022+0000) > > Because they specifically don’t want AP champions to use it. AP champions don’t need true damage. What would be so bad about AP champions getting true damage?
Their spells tend to be front loaded and do huge burst damage, so turning that into 20% true damage would flat out break them.
Sonic132 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=snAncEHa,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-06-01T21:56:40.369+0000) > If we need a tank and no one is hovering one, I’m banning out our top lane’s Teemo. That's not you deciding top should play a tank and trying to force them to? You can call it something else if you like, but you're trying to micromanage your teammate's picks, and that's not cool.
That's me removing one option, but yes that's me trying to influence our team's picks. It's completely cool and Riot has deemed it as such.
Sonic132 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=snAncEHa,comment-id=000200010000,timestamp=2018-06-04T17:46:03.225+0000) > > Except they do have authority. Everyone has the authority to ban one champion. No one has the right to contract a champion. So no, you can't penalize banning a teammate's champion because everyone has the full authority to not see any champion for any reason in any game. Except they don't have the authority to choose their teammate's picks. Which is the literally stated intent behind the ban.
They'e not choosing their teammate's picks, the teammate is allowed to choose any available champion. He's not going "I want you to play Shen or I troll." It's a ban, and clearly Riot is for it.
eaglei3 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=snAncEHa,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-06-01T21:56:40.369+0000) > > If we need a tank and no one is hovering one, I’m banning out our top lane’s Teemo. This might honestly be one of the worst reasons I have seen someone state they used a ban. Within ones right of the ban system, but still picking on one position for not playing tank when there are other positions that can pick up a tank. Guess it just goes to show it is easier for some to try and force it instead of communicating with teammates.
It's because there are traditional roles all lanes go. There's a reason you don't take Ornn bot lane and just "Let other positions pick up a marksman." Top lane tends to be tanks, junglers tend to either be tanks or carries, mid lane tends to be mages or assassins, bot lane is almost exclusively marksmen and support. Sure, if I see support hover Leona, jungle hover Zac, and top hover Teemo, power to Teemo. But when I see the jungler wanting to play Khazix, support wants to Janna, mid wants to Orianna, bot wants to Sivir and top wants to Teemo, I can recognize there is a problem and honestly there isn't much time to discuss what the best options are. So, I naturally want to ban Teemo because traditionally, top is tanky. Same concept if top wants Sion, mid wants Zed, jungle wants khazix, bot wants Jhin, support wants Pyke/really anything because at this point it doesn't matter. We have 4 AD. I'm going to naturally ban either Zed or kha zix, most likely Zed since traditionally mid is where AP flourishes and there's more of a chance he'll pick something AP than the jungler will. And yes, it is easier to force it. The banning phase is small, not everyone is paying attention, some people choose not to type. I'll simply ban Teemo, and it's in his full right to pick something like Kennan or something else non-tank. But, that much is out of my control. I did my part and tried to prevent a problematic team comp. From my experience, people tend to shift to something smarter because they understand they were target banned because their pick didn't work. Sometimes I get spited and they pick something equally bad or even worse for trolls, but if they want to take the path of immaturity that's their deal. My choice was made off of educated reasoning and in no way directed at the player, just at the team comp.
Sonic132 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=snAncEHa,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-06-01T21:56:40.369+0000) > > It should not because everyone is entitled to not seeing a champion in a game. Whether you don’t like how that champion synergizes wth your own team or don’t want to run the risk of the enemy getting it, hovering a champion shouldn’t be a contract. If everyone is hovering AD, I know mid lane is optimal for magic damage so I’m going to ban out our team’s Zed or a Talon because I know a 4-5 AD team is destined for failure in most scenarios. If Tristana is horribly broken and our 4th pick ADC wants trist, I’m sorry but I can’t run the risk of letting the enemy pick her. If we need a tank and no one is hovering one, I’m banning out our top lane’s Teemo. > > Most “malicious” bans aren’t malicious in intent, they’re done out of logical reason. It’s rare that you get into a game and some guy plays eenie meenie minie moe to decide which teammate’s pick gets to be banned because lol troll. Whilst I don’t agree with that thought process, due to the reasons mentioned above, you can’t restrict it. You absolutely can. The correctness of the theory is irrelevant. Their authority is what matters. And unless they're team captain of a premade team... _they don't have any_.
Except they do have authority. Everyone has the authority to ban one champion. No one has the right to contract a champion. So no, you can't penalize banning a teammate's champion because everyone has the full authority to not see any champion for any reason in any game.
: Your gonna remove Pykes Ultimate that instant Kills once some time as pass,just like Ornn
One is a core mechanic of the ult, one was one of many factors as to why a tank was horribly broken. Not even close to the same.
: Flaming Players because you dont like the fact PYKE IS A SUPPORT.
My only gripe with Pyke is that he is an AD assassin, meaning it's very easy to have a deficit in magic damage when he's picked. Obviously 3 other roles can pick AP, but generally top and jungle are more AD oriented, with AD being exclusively good in the jungle right now due to scuttle competition. That leaves top lane, and while there are many viable AP tops, it tends to swing towards AD way more often than not. That leaves only mid as the magic damage role and often times, that's not enough. Especially with Zed having such a high pick rate, I've just been seeing so many total AD comps or just about total AD comps. At least when mage supports are picked, there's plenty of AP damage and if tank supports are picked, you have plenty of front line. I think Pyke is a cool concept, but his archtype really does complicate putting together a team moreso than the other supports. With good coordination it can be fine, but keep in mind solo queue is what this game predominantly is and I think that's a large reason Pyke is struggling. Also I think Pyke's ult needs work. I feel like it should only be targetable on champions because people typically spam a button to make sure the server reads it and make sure it is cast right after CC/another spell is over or you're in range and I've found that since his ult reset can be cast literally anywhere, it's too easy to double cast it.
Aivess (NA)
: Is intentionally banning an allies hover pick reportable?
It should not because everyone is entitled to not seeing a champion in a game. Whether you don’t like how that champion synergizes wth your own team or don’t want to run the risk of the enemy getting it, hovering a champion shouldn’t be a contract. If everyone is hovering AD, I know mid lane is optimal for magic damage so I’m going to ban out our team’s Zed or a Talon because I know a 4-5 AD team is destined for failure in most scenarios. If Tristana is horribly broken and our 4th pick ADC wants trist, I’m sorry but I can’t run the risk of letting the enemy pick her. If we need a tank and no one is hovering one, I’m banning out our top lane’s Teemo. Most “malicious” bans aren’t malicious in intent, they’re done out of logical reason. It’s rare that you get into a game and some guy plays eenie meenie minie moe to decide which teammate’s pick gets to be banned because lol troll. Whilst I don’t agree with that thought process, due to the reasons mentioned above, you can’t restrict it. And I’ll admit, I’ve had games where a single champion was played seemingly over and over and did poorly over and over. So I saw someone, again, hovered it and decided I’m not risking it again. Nothing against the player at all, it’s the champion. (Main offender is Kha’Zix). It’s frustrating when it happens, but you’re over dramatizing how much of a calamity it is when it happens. There are 120+ other champions to choose from. Yeah you really wanted to play one, but it’s not like your entire day was ruined because you couldn’t and if it was, you’re probably not mature enough to play the game. We can’t always get what we want. I main zed personally. As you can imagine, I’m used to not playing Zed because he’s been consistently high on the ban list for a couple years now. I can attest that even though I play this hated champion, I’ve only been target banned by my own team maybe .5% of my games. What I’m saying Is that it’s an extreme rarity. I’m sure our experiences aren’t matching, but I can’t imagine you’re having a much worse time if I’m playing an infamously hated champion. Just play something else. You’ll get your pick another game. It’s not worth getting angry over, and especially not worth calling for penalties and making posts over.
: Well, I get Rengar, but I thought Katarina was supposed to be that big AoE Assassin.
Yes but an assassin capable of a 5 man assassinate is oppressive, regardless of their archtype. You could design an assassin that's supposed to be that "big cc bot" but it doesn't make it balanced. That's why tank assassins are cancerous to the game and typically hard nerfed. Once assassins have viable tank builds, the game becomes unfun. Katarina isn't included in this, she was nerfed for her own reasons but that was a large driver for Fizz, Ekko, Rengar, Akali. Katarina has aoe, fine, but she's not an assassin if she jumps into an entire team and they all explode. That's just ziggs without mana.
wuthappen (EUW)
: Maybe people would find it more fair if assassins actually had to earn their power instead of buying {{item:3134}} and oneshotting the oppponent at 6 with {{summoner:14}}, even though they went even in lane.
What does earning power mean? You paid gold for an item, that seems like earning. However, assassins are stronger early-mid game and fall off late game generally so that's why they get an earlier spike. But assassins' kits are designed for 1v1. It would be unfair if a mage an assassin were evenly matched at 6 if they were even in gold and experience because that implies the kits are equal in 1v1. But while mages tend to have wave clear and range, assassins are typically single target or melee so again it wouldn't make sense for them to be equal at all in these scenarios. I think the mistake people make is they expect any champion to fight an assassin 1v1 and, all factors equal, the fight be equal. But if that's the case, then assassins need buffs because then there's no reason to play an assassin when you could do a mage who does the same thing but with wave clear and better team fighting.
isilpro (NA)
: Account Hacked, Sold, Permabanned, tried everything but can't seem to get through
You honestly do deserve your account back, but sadly Riot cannot undo permanent bans on individual accounts under any circumstance besides a technical error on their part. This is because once they start doing that, the sheer volume of requests to unban would be overwhelming, and suddenly Riot has to draw some sort of subjective, figurative line on who gets unbanned and who does not. Riot has the policy of no unbanning ever because whilst your case is genuine, there are thousands of others who just want it back because "they'll be good from now on" or "It wasn't my fault, how come he got an unban?" Not saying I agree with Riot, but that's just how it is. They can undo permaban playing status, like Tyler1 for example, but he never got an old account back. It's a bit different. Actual accounts, once permanently banned, are simply gone. Only technical error can reverse it.
: They also have a lot better mobility in general than fighters.
That’s the trade off for the rankings they don’t have. Fighters typically have some sort of way to naturally mitigate damage, assassins typically struggle with this. But assassins tend to be more mobile. Either way, people complain about dying to zed but you aren’t meant to 1v1 him. Assassins start seeing nerfs when they start dominating in team fights, see Katarina and Rengar nerfs.
: Love getting "outplayed by a Zed omegalulz"
You’re going to die 1v1 vs Zed. Get over it. He’s a hyper damage assassin. I don’t see why you believe that you should have a chance 1v1 against one of the highest damage assassins in the game. Don’t try and fight him 1v1 and if you’re alone, play very safe. His strength is 1v1s, his weakness is team fights. You have a team for a reason. Unless zed severely misplays, the 1v1 is his game. Don’t play some stupid shit like Xerath or Vel’koz and think you have the right to go toe to toe with any assassin, let alone zed. Assassins literally do one thing and that’s dump damage onto a champion. Take that from them and they’re just shitty fighters.
Rioter Comments
: Being a Weeb
You are BMing and being toxic, but harmlessly so. It's essentially you gloating. Doesn't mean stop doing it, and certainly not reportable in any way. But it is, by definition, toxic.
: What does "stat check" mean?
Think Nocturne or Olaf. Their kits essentially just give them a bunch of stats. Nocturne gets AD, AS, MS, lifesteal. Olaf gets MS, AS, Lifesteal, MR, Armor, AD. Compare that to a champion like Talon or Caitlyn.
: Triumph, Presence of Mind, Dark Harvest.
: It's sad seeing AZuBK abusing snowball runes in aram with no aram changes on the pbe
: WHY THE SUPPORT DONT CARE???
Again, why is EUW and EUNE allowed to post threads? It's this same shit over and over.
: What killed the new Talon is his new passive, they put all the damage there and they ask you to stack it 3 times, get in range with the enemy and AA, why should an assassin do that to begin with? and to add more salt to the wound they made his [W] so narrow, slow, doesn't slow at first part not to mention he lost 15% damage amplifier on ALL of his damage "used to be passive in his old [E]".
You're making him sound a lot worse than he is, though. To activate the passive, you merely have to hit W, Q and then auto which can be done quickly. His old passive was god awful and was a meme, like Lissandra's current passive. Even if the new one isn't perfect, it's better than the old one that increased AUTO damage against impaired targets. I've never had a problem activating his passive, and I think it makes for very favorable lane trades. His E also wasn't a 15% damage amp. That's at level 18. For most of the game, it was 3%.
: Rengar didnt fail to kill people when he was reworked
He didn't fail to kill anyone, it's that he was clunky while doing it and had the potential to wipe out people in a cluster as well. People don't like clunky, clunky doesn't belong anywhere on an assassin, a major downfall of reworked LB as well.
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=QmhdE8M9,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-04-23T12:56:34.730+0000) > > Well they both failed at their jobs when they were reworked. LeBlanc became a kiting mage, not an assassin. Adding a fixed burst window goes against assassin design. At least Zed's fixed time does not require his actual presence to occur. LeBlanc had to be within casting range the entire time and that was problematic. > > Rengar became clunky, which is terrible on an assassin. They're meant to be fluid, quick champions and changing his Q to this awkward, half dash aoe cone just slowed him down immensely. It didn't fix the problem that the rework was meant to address which was him deleting champions instantly when fed because when reworked Rengar got fed, he'd still delete just in a clunkier manner as well as in an aoe so possibly deleting groups. > > Katarina's rework was a wild success, as much as I hate to say it. They made her extremely telegraphed but also extremely mobile and having lots of options in most situations. She's no longer an extremely feast or famine champ hard countered by CC. They just have to be sure her numbers are in order. > > Talon's W was slowed to give his targets a chance to breathe before they're killed. If you remember old Talon, could charge Q, E, and throw W and ult at the same time and the blades would essentially converge at the same time as your Q-empowered auto hit and the entire kit just came together in one, crazy burst. I'm all for assassins, but that's a bit silly. What Talon needs the most is for Riot to go in to -every- single bit of terrain Summoner's Rift has, by this I mean the walls, and fix any and all bugs that cause's Talon to jump in some stupid manner. I've died/failed to get a kill so many times because I E'd a wall and Talon decided to flip 3 yds to the right or something dumb like that. The W does feel clunky, so it would be nice if they could increase the speed that it comes back. Not necessarily projectile speed but the time it takes to start coming back, even by like .25 seconds. Overall, I think he just needs some animation smoothing and cast time changes, no real rework. The fact that you would suggest old Talon is faster at killing single targets than the new Talon kinda tells me that you haven't played against a good Talon. What he lost wasn't his fast combo, it's mostly just AoE. Everything else is made up for.
I've played plenty of new Talon. The burst window was lowered which is factual. Instead of instant blink, it's effectively a dash. The W blades converge slower. The only way one could argue new Talon is quicker or equal in terms of killing speed is that he can Q out of his ult and the ult converges upon the target. Although old E blink's you behind your target so often times it didn't matter, and it slowed so regardless ult would always hit the enemy. I take that back then, the only way one could argue he is faster at killing or equal is if he is able to Q in melee for the bonus damage. Otherwise, he cannot execute his entire combo as quickly. I'm not saying it's a dramatic difference. But the window was extended, even if only slightly.
: @RiotRepertoir, 2 out of 4 Reworked Assassins have been reverted
Well they both failed at their jobs when they were reworked. LeBlanc became a kiting mage, not an assassin. Adding a fixed burst window goes against assassin design. At least Zed's fixed time does not require his actual presence to occur. LeBlanc had to be within casting range the entire time and that was problematic. Rengar became clunky, which is terrible on an assassin. They're meant to be fluid, quick champions and changing his Q to this awkward, half dash aoe cone just slowed him down immensely. It didn't fix the problem that the rework was meant to address which was him deleting champions instantly when fed because when reworked Rengar got fed, he'd still delete just in a clunkier manner as well as in an aoe so possibly deleting groups. Katarina's rework was a wild success, as much as I hate to say it. They made her extremely telegraphed but also extremely mobile and having lots of options in most situations. She's no longer an extremely feast or famine champ hard countered by CC. They just have to be sure her numbers are in order. Talon's W was slowed to give his targets a chance to breathe before they're killed. If you remember old Talon, could charge Q, E, and throw W and ult at the same time and the blades would essentially converge at the same time as your Q-empowered auto hit and the entire kit just came together in one, crazy burst. I'm all for assassins, but that's a bit silly. What Talon needs the most is for Riot to go in to -every- single bit of terrain Summoner's Rift has, by this I mean the walls, and fix any and all bugs that cause's Talon to jump in some stupid manner. I've died/failed to get a kill so many times because I E'd a wall and Talon decided to flip 3 yds to the right or something dumb like that. The W does feel clunky, so it would be nice if they could increase the speed that it comes back. Not necessarily projectile speed but the time it takes to start coming back, even by like .25 seconds. Overall, I think he just needs some animation smoothing and cast time changes, no real rework.
: Post any unwarranted flaming you recieved recently
Flame is rarely unwarranted. It is usually not "right" and against rules, but emotions are generated from something. To say unwarranted implies that you're dealing with someone with a mental instability/disability and cannot control their emotions/prone to random outbursts. Otherwise, a chain of events led to flame happening. Judging from this, you set it off with that passive aggressive line of yours. Had you stayed silent or replied warmly, you most likely would not have been subject to the hostility that you were. Again, not saying you deserved flame, but I am saying it was not unwarranted. An eye for an eye leaves the world blind, as the saying goes, and I'm not saying I would've said anything different in your position, but by replying the way you did, it was not unwarranted.
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=d5ZpAzyP,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2018-04-20T19:15:37.544+0000) > > I didn't say they were your intentions :). You said that. Well why would you post "Being super nice on boards doesn't help your honor level in any way!" in the first place? Maybe it's the fact that you don't believe me because I was banned for being toxic and trying to regain honor by posting on the boards and putting up a facade to earn extra honor would somehow work you would bring up something obnoxious such as your "fun-fact" to remind me of something utterly useless. Everyone knows that the only way to get honors is after every game. I don't want to assume that and jump to any conclusions so that's why I addressed your post and to state my intentions just in case some confused minds would be questioning on why I'm doing this.
> [{quoted}](name=BeastMode Mikey,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=d5ZpAzyP,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2018-04-20T20:16:00.026+0000) > > Well why would you post "Being super nice on boards doesn't help your honor level in any way!" in the first place? Maybe it's the fact that you don't believe me because I was banned for being toxic and trying to regain honor by posting on the boards and putting up a facade to earn extra honor would somehow work you would bring up something obnoxious such as your "fun-fact" to remind me of something utterly useless. Everyone knows that the only way to get honors is after every game. I don't want to assume that and jump to any conclusions so that's why I addressed your post and to state my intentions just in case some confused minds would be questioning on why I'm doing this. I posted it as a friendly reminder, you're taking it so defensively. Not accusing you of it, just felt it was relevant to what the post was about. However I'd never imply those were your intentions, everyone has their own reasons and it's not polite to assume.
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=d5ZpAzyP,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-04-20T18:22:38.467+0000) > > Fun fact: Being super nice on boards doesn't help your honor level in any way! Not saying those were the intentions, but just letting you know! Not surprised. In some way shape or form, there's always that skeptical person who believes when they see something that is probably too good to be true, it usually is haha. In this case, a "positive" person leaving a positive message in general discussion is probably too good to be true and would want something in exchange for so called positive message. Such as an honor boost. No intentions in that direction. My only intention is to provide healthy, and positive practices for the masses to win.
> [{quoted}](name=BeastMode Mikey,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=d5ZpAzyP,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-04-20T18:37:11.640+0000) > > Not surprised. In some way shape or form, there's always that skeptical person who believes when they see something that is probably too good to be true, it usually is haha. In this case, a "positive" person leaving a positive message in general discussion is probably too good to be true and would want something in exchange for so called positive message. Such as an honor boost. No intentions in that direction. My only intention is to provide healthy, and positive practices for the masses to win. I didn't say they were your intentions :). You said that.
: After being banned during Feb my honor lvl went down to 0. But now it's progressing. :')
Fun fact: Being super nice on boards doesn't help your honor level in any way! Not saying those were the intentions, but just letting you know!
Poske (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=6Ak4hV1N,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2018-04-17T16:24:49.457+0000) > > It doesn't matter if they admit to it, there needs to be other proof, as odd as that sounds. Or else any streamer who fucks up on stream and goes "I'm trolling", which for them means "I messed up" would get banned for admitting to trolling. Yeah it doesnt work like that Try confessing you murdered someone at curt tell me how it goes same principle Reggardless evidance is them not playing like master tier players
A murder case and an account sharing case are two different things. Someone disconnects and I go “Ha, I DDos’d him” to troll doesn’t make it true. Also, In fact, it does work that way now that I think about it. You can’t just admit to murdering someone. The case doesn’t just end. There’s still an in depth investigation to see if you’re telling the truth or if you’re taking the fall for someone else. You would get in trouble for lying under oath perhaps, but not for murder if it was found you didn’t do it. And not playing like master tier players, I’m sure you encounter horribly performing players in masters all the time that didn’t play like masters. Happens all the time in every elo, including challenger. Riot won’t ban them on account of a game or two. If they see a pattern they’ll take action.
Poske (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=6Ak4hV1N,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-04-16T16:57:24.126+0000) > > I mean, people can say what they want in chat. I can say "I'm scripting." and I can be reported, but nothing will happen. You need more than words to be guilty of something. They openly admitted account sharing Of course intelligent accoung sharer ll never do this but..
It doesn't matter if they admit to it, there needs to be other proof, as odd as that sounds. Or else any streamer who fucks up on stream and goes "I'm trolling", which for them means "I messed up" would get banned for admitting to trolling.
Poske (EUNE)
: I just witnessed 2 accounts being shared 2 games in a row
I mean, people can say what they want in chat. I can say "I'm scripting." and I can be reported, but nothing will happen. You need more than words to be guilty of something.
Sanngriðr (EUNE)
: Someone tell me the point of soloque again.
Lol, so you think because when you played this game at a terrible point of balance and a tiny champion pool you are above everyone else? You want to go back to the days of 1v5? How is that balance? It’s a team game. You can still carry, but it’s not do well and take out an entire team. You can take the lead and run with it, but you can’t be 1500g ahead and lol into the enemy team and come out fine. Coordinate with your team and press your advantage. Stay in EUNE, kid. No one wants season 2 league again.
: How do I play against Tanks/Assassins bot?
You have a support. That’s literally it. That’s literally all you need. A defensive support and you can’t die with the 10 shields and heals they can provide through proper itemization. If you want to personally do something, phantom dancer/death’sdance. GA.
k wìx (NA)
: With the exception of a few abilities, buffs that get applied mid-animation or during 'spell travel' time WILL affect the ability or auto in question. Fun-fact: This works for damage-over-time abilities and debuffs as well. **Example: Exhausting a Zed that has ulted and ignited a target will reduce the damage of BOTH abilities in real time, even if he has already applied them and the player is 'waiting' to die. ** The only exception I can think of right now is Nami's Tidecaller Buff - this wont affect current autos in motion, as the buff simply enchants 'the next 3 auto attacks'.
Exhaust doesn’t reduce ignite damage. True damage cannot be reduced in any manner in the game. The stated number will happen no matter how much damage reduction you have. Only invulnerability stops true damage, and in some cases (fountain laser) it does not.
Juill (EUNE)
: Banned for leaving during champ select?!?
Most likely your connection cut out, probably not them. Also, it’s not a ban. It’s a dodge penalty. Way different. I went into this thinking you got a 14 day for dodging.
: STOP BANNING DECLARED PICKS
Then you pick something squishier. You build squishier. Your LP is never worth giving into bullies. If someone is trying to force you to play their game, say fuck it and spite them. Clearly they care way more than you, so you have the power. They want to ruin your fun, ruin theirs. It’s not trolling if you try and make it work. I’m not saying throw, but try it out. Win win situation. Either you win with your fun pick and get to laugh at your teammate for being an asshole And gain lp, or you lose and know he’s raging to his friends about him being in silver because of trolls.
: Zoe, Malzahar, or LeBlanc?
Malzahar. Super easy and brain dead, can make brain dead catches, has brain dead peel. Brain dead farming. Super effective at all stages of the game.
Poske (EUNE)
: I dont even feel like Duskblade is nerfed
The idea is that assassins shouldn’t be forced to rely on an item to be relevant, which is what duskblade was. Nerf the item, buff the champions and then it’s easier to balance numbers from there. Also, it did not lose 30 damage. It lost 35-120. That’s pretty huge. If you don’t think that warranted buffs to assassins, who were already in a poor position, then you probably don’t have grounds to complain in the first place.
Silvër (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=qlEFYEeA,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2018-04-10T15:18:49.203+0000) > > It's considered cheating. :O really?! may i see where this info is?
I'm fucking with you guys, of course it's allowed lol.
: really? why?
Silvër (NA)
: Are you allowed to switch roles while in Clash gamemode?
Nope. That's an automatic 14 day ban sadly.
: > [{quoted}](name=Nahui,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Ouc3N7Lb,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2018-04-05T19:02:49.172+0000) > > Because the 60 million don't know how to play the game. It's not right to balance around a majority of players who don't play correctly. isn't this kinda an moronic statement to make. where do you think those pro players come from? Thin air?
They come from the 60 million pool once they are good enough and then they know balance. Granted, sure. In that entire 60 million, some non professional players have grounds to talk balance because technically there are other barriers to pro play besides skill. But the vast, super majority still shouldn’t be balanced around. And it’s the vast super majority that cry for the stupidest nerfs like master yi and Morgana Q. Plus, the loudest voices come from low Elo. Notice how it’s the champions abused in challenger and that high elo streamers talk about/pro players talk about that get nerfed. Most of boards is garbage, including me. Most of Reddit is garbage. Most of everyone is garbage. Including me. (I say this so you don’t feel the need to point out my rank as if I’m above it all.) However, if you’d like to discredit posts with insults, ill step down to your level. Isn’t it moronic that you shit out that sad excuse of a post without so much as thinking of the implications of balance and how most complaints work? I’d prefer not to play a game that is balanced around low elo garbage like me. 90% of players are below gold 5. 90%. You want the game balanced around gold? You’re delusional and should feel ashamed you even made this forum post in the first place.
: Buff Lissandra
I don't think her Q needs range. She works as an all in champion. E to go in, melee range snare. Option to melee range AOE ult. Adding durability to her would be rough because her natural build path makes it very easy for her to build durability, such as proto/RoA/Liandries. That coupled with her ult makes her pretty tanky. Buffing her damage might be tough because of her low CDs. I voted durability, but to be honest, I'm not sure durability would be good. It might make her too tanky. I feel like they could explore a new passive for her to be honest. Maybe damage dealing, maybe not. Maybe some sort of glacial shield or armor that triggers a small shield when damage is dealt so she can survive that initial reactionary damage dump when she E's into the middle of a whole team.
: Matchmaking? Or better Bullsh*tmaking? Tilted player reports his "thoughts" about "Matchmaking"
So are you saying it's fair to load an entire team of 50%+ win rate players? Think about the implications of that, that's rigging one team to win. They mix it up, especially for those climbing to see if they can actually carry or if they're getting lucky and being carried. But, go ahead and blame Riot for your rank. Your rank has nothing to do with you. Everyone in challenger paid Riot to be there, same with masters. Once you donate enough money, you'll wake up one day and your account will be in challenger.
: Brand its one assasin?
http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/Brand Blaze INNATE: Brand's abilities set his targets ablaze upon damaging them each second, dealing 4% of their maximum health as magic damage over 4 seconds, stacking up to 3 times, for a maximum of 12% of their maximum health over the duration, and empowering his abilities against them. The damage against monsters is capped at 320. Killing an enemy that is Blaze Ablaze restores 6 - 18 (based on level) mana. Blaze 2 At 3 stacks, an area around the target is marked, which explodes after 2 seconds. All enemies struck are dealt 12% - 16% (based on level) 「 (+ 1.5% per 100 AP) 」 of their maximum health as magic damage. The explosion will still trigger if the target dies to the third ability or during the delay. Brand cannot stack Blaze more than once on enemies who have exploded in the past 4 seconds Weird, I don't know what website you're looking at but this one seems to match his passive in game. If you have any questions, I can explain any part you may find confusing. I don't see this 1,000,000 AP gain though, I think the site you're using is a fraud.
Show more

Nahui

Level 117 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion