Takazaki (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Pootis Bootis,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=WVt1zY1O,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-09-06T21:42:26.256+0000) > > cant include the full post due to mods you don't have to, this statement is just straight wrong. It's prohibited on the boards to talk about it, but I can objectively say this is just straight wrong. It's like saying racism doesn't exist anymore because of the equal rights act(s) or affirmative action.
> [{quoted}](name=Takazaki,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=WVt1zY1O,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2018-09-06T21:56:10.299+0000) > > you don't have to, this statement is just straight wrong. > > It's prohibited on the boards to talk about it, but I can objectively say this is just straight wrong. It's like saying racism doesn't exist anymore because of the equal rights act(s) or affirmative action. lol discrimination against women is not nearly as bad as it used to be. Show me some factual evidence were discrimination is so awful and so rampant. I got one the Middle east yet people like you cry discrimination in America and how such a "horrible" country it is. And I did not say discrimination against women does not exist I said: "They act like women are heavily discriminated against even though that is not the case." Were is my quote saying it does not exist? Its bullshit the fact that men are discriminated against in this society now and there is a bullshit double standards that I have to up hold now because of "Political Correctness" A term coined by Bolshevik pigs.
Takazaki (NA)
: yikes This is halve the problem right here. You don't see it, so thusly it doesn't exist. > They act like women are heavily discriminated against even though that is not the case.
> [{quoted}](name=Takazaki,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=WVt1zY1O,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-09-06T21:18:54.480+0000) > > yikes > > This is halve the problem right here. You don't see it, so thusly it doesn't exist. cant include the full post due to mods and they do act like it lol. LETS HAVE A WOMENS ONLY PLACE AND SHUT DOWN CERTAIN BOARDS FOR MEN SO WOMEN CAN ONLY USE IT. Fuck off it is the case they are a bunch of triggered feminists
: About this DZK guy
Lets just accept his ways and not voice our opinions about their suppression of men sure! Fucking idiot we might as well shut our mouths and let communist authoritarian leaders take over but hey lets ignore it! Most false agreement ive ever heard.
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Bijeesny,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=yxZv07bZ,comment-id=00080001,timestamp=2018-09-02T23:03:02.695+0000) > > There is a racial slur that's bannable offense (like 'kys' and 'n-word') and it's called c00n, and google search shows me urban disctionary link as a 1st search https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coon > So if that term is a racist term which is more commonly used as a shorter name for racoon then this one is most likely offensive aswell. There is some factual information on Wikipedia, that does not make it a reliable source for factual information. There are some words and definitions on Urbandictionary.com that also appear in an actual dictionary, that does not make it a reliable source for definitions. The aforementioned websites are moderated and edited by a community of random users on the internet often with the intention of satire, trolling, and other comedic pursuits. One person's assertion that "sea lion" could be anti-Semitic does not account for any sort of history or accepted consensus. Read through the other "definitions" for "sea lion" and you will find that there is no connection between the seemingly random, personal definitions of the term. The word you mentioned is a widely recognized racial slur with a history that goes back decades. I don't think any of us had ever heard "sea lion" used before this weekend. It is not a widely recognized slur, it does not have any significant history.
> [{quoted}](name=Brauminator,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=yxZv07bZ,comment-id=000800010000,timestamp=2018-09-03T00:00:49.138+0000) > > There is some factual information on Wikipedia, that does not make it a reliable source for factual information. There are some words and definitions on Urbandictionary.com that also appear in an actual dictionary, that does not make it a reliable source for definitions. The aforementioned websites are moderated and edited by a community of random users on the internet often with the intention of satire, trolling, and other comedic pursuits. One person's assertion that "sea lion" could be anti-Semitic does not account for any sort of history or accepted consensus. Read through the other "definitions" for "sea lion" and you will find that there is no connection between the seemingly random, personal definitions of the term. The word you mentioned is a widely recognized racial slur with a history that goes back decades. I don't think any of us had ever heard "sea lion" used before this weekend. It is not a widely recognized slur, it does not have any significant history. it is actually a slur were I live down south in Alabama people around have used it to describe jews. It is truly a slur!
: Is Daniel Z. a Anti Semitic?
And if the boards moderators takes this down you really are showing your Anti Semitic colors!
: Is Daniel Z. a Anti Semitic?
I dont have problem with jokes at all but I have a a problem when riot allows this type of shit to run rampant within their own structure while they cry women's rights and inequality
: Is Daniel Z. a Anti Semitic?
Very insulting the fact that Riot allows Anti Semites into their staff is disgusting!
Rioter Comments

Pootis Bootis

Level 63 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion