: > [{quoted}](name=Scuffleboard,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=AH9cUAZu,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-10-26T17:14:22.539+0000) > > Spear of Shojin is just an inherently toxic design. If Renekton ends up in a super bad spot after the removal, he can get compensation buffs instead of leaving such a poorly designed item in the game for the sake of like 1 champion. theres no "if" he WILL end up in a super bad spot, it's mathematically impossible for him to not be in a super spot, he got no passive, no range, his base skills got the longest cd in the entire game, they're even worse than skills with half or less of its cd, how could he not end up in a super bad spot?
> [{quoted}](name=Taekwon the God,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=AH9cUAZu,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-10-26T18:54:33.067+0000) > > theres no "if" he WILL end up in a super bad spot, it's mathematically impossible for him to not be in a super spot, he got no passive, no range, his base skills got the longest cd in the entire game, they're even worse than skills with half or less of its cd, how could he not end up in a super bad spot? I agree that he will probably end up on the weak side. What I'm saying is that compensation buffs will happen if he's underperforming severely.
: Riot pls read it this is really important
Spear of Shojin is just an inherently toxic design. If Renekton ends up in a super bad spot after the removal, he can get compensation buffs instead of leaving such a poorly designed item in the game for the sake of like 1 champion.
: We need men in the bottom lane (EQUALITY BABY)
braum is the manliest man of all time though, idk what you're talking about
NongLek (NA)
: WHAT is "mmr " ?
> [{quoted}](name=NongLek,realm=NA,application-id=6WpmgL9O,discussion-id=fZcEfRGm,comment-id=0000000000030000,timestamp=2018-11-17T11:38:48.824+0000) > > WHAT is "mmr " ? It stands for "Match Making Rating". It goes up with wins and down with losses. The game tries to group people with a similar MMR together, so new players won't be playing games with high-level people who have mastered the game.
NongLek (NA)
: speaking of RANKED, WHEN can i PLAY ranked games ? at what level ?
> [{quoted}](name=NongLek,realm=NA,application-id=6WpmgL9O,discussion-id=fZcEfRGm,comment-id=000000000004,timestamp=2018-11-17T11:37:41.197+0000) > > speaking of RANKED, WHEN can i PLAY ranked games ? > at what level ? Level 30.
Rioter Comments
: So blatant sexism against men now at riot.
What the fuck? This seems like some kind of stupid attempt at cosmic correction or something. Come on guys. Grow a fucking brain.
Rioter Comments
: Could Galio Not Back Up Three Miles During His E
boards glitch sorry, delete this please mods
: Could Galio Not Back Up Three Miles During His E
{{champion:22}} {{champion:63}} {{champion:31}} {{champion:122}} {{champion:9}} {{champion:41}} {{champion:74}} {{champion:134}} {{champion:29}} {{champion:30}} {{champion:96}} {{champion:99}} {{champion:90}} {{champion:25}} {{champion:61}} {{champion:13}} {{champion:68}} {{champion:45}} {{champion:161}} {{champion:112}} {{champion:498}} {{champion:101}} {{champion:83}} {{champion:142}} {{champion:143}} These champions, off the top of my head (I'm pretty sure there are others) all have NO blinks or dashes that allow them to escape. It's not like Galio is the only champion with no way to get out.
Rioter Comments
: I will be spending the next few weeks making detailed posts about Riot's corruption/deception
You will then be wasting your time. Riot isn't running some sort of shadow government deep state conspiracy. They're removing toxic players to make the community better, not to make more money. And while Riot, like all companies, has its flaws, banning players just to moneygrab is not one of them. BM, flashing mastery or something, is one thing. Being a dick is another, and it absolutely warrants punishment even if there is a mute button. Bulletproof vests don't make shooting people okay.
: I reported someone who said the n-word 4 times and didn't get a message saying he was punished
The feedback message is very unreliable. If the player in question did do that, it's extremely likely that they were given an immediate 14-day ban.
: Simple. Riot openly admits to being against the basic human right of free speech while not actually adhering to their own Summoner's Code which states you can't do things at the expense of your allies (rule 4).
> [{quoted}](name=Uber Deer,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=7l27EZE5,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-07-10T22:18:10.751+0000) > > Simple. Riot openly admits to being against the basic human right of free speech while not actually adhering to their own Summoner's Code which states you can't do things at the expense of your allies (rule 4). Free speech doesn't stop a company like Riot from telling you to shut up or get out. Free speech only ensures that the government can't stop you from speaking. And I don't know what you mean by Riot not adhering to the Summoner's Code.
: If humans actually read reports...
That's not true. Multiple reports in the same game have no increased weight.
: permabanned for defending myself?
These are pretty close to the worst logs I've ever seen, and I've seen a few. An instant permaban would be deserved here.
Rioter Comments
Vanic998 (NA)
: Yes! You get it! I've been saying this forever. Velkoz already has all the damage he needs. His main issue is he is unreliable at dealing it. It frustrates me when I land my whole combo and the enemy still gets away or turns it around because of how short his e suspension duration is. It's to the point where im calling it **the worst skilshot in the game.** Its difficulty to land it aint worth it's reward. A delay, small aoe (It's aoe yet you're most likely only going to hit one enemy campion anyway), and its range is dangerous since its within dashing range and yet all you get is a measly .75 sec suspension. Not even a whole second. Velkoz's ult deals damage over 2.5 secs which means that e is only suspending an enemy for a little less than a third of his ult duration. Like you I suggested increasing his e suspension duration. In other previous posts. I suggested increasing it by .25 sec from .75 sec to 1 sec but your idea of increasing it by .35 sec sounds good too. When riot reveals the buff on PBE, I hope the e suspension duration is what they change. I'd be pissed if they buff his damage. Just curious, what source are you using for the statistics? My source says velkoz has been at 48-49% winrate with about a 1.1-1.2% playrate.
> [{quoted}](name=Vanic998,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=1upEo3B2,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2018-07-07T05:53:42.170+0000) > > Yes! You get it! I've been saying this forever. Velkoz already has all the damage he needs. His main issue is he is unreliable at dealing it. It frustrates me when I land my whole combo and the enemy still gets away or turns it around because of how short his e suspension duration is. It's to the point where im calling it **the worst skilshot in the game.** > > Its difficulty to land it aint worth it's reward. A delay, small aoe (It's aoe yet you're most likely only going to hit one enemy campion anyway), and its range is dangerous since its within dashing range and yet all you get is a measly .75 sec suspension. Not even a whole second. Velkoz's ult deals damage over 2.5 secs which means that e is only suspending an enemy for a little less than a third of his ult duration. > > Like you I suggested increasing his e suspension duration. In other previous posts. I suggested increasing it by .25 sec from .75 sec to 1 sec but your idea of increasing it by .35 sec sounds good too. When riot reveals the buff on PBE, I hope the e suspension duration is what they change. I'd be pissed if they buff his damage. > > Just curious, what source are you using for the statistics? My source says velkoz has been at 48-49% winrate with about a 1.1-1.2% playrate. I used op.gg. What were you using?
: >Knockup duration is increased to 1.1 seconds and is no longer affected by Tenacity. Cast time is also quickened. Wait, I thought tenacity doesn't work on knock ups?
> [{quoted}](name=MOLTinaTOR,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=1upEo3B2,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-07-06T13:47:26.262+0000) > > Wait, I thought tenacity doesn't work on knock ups? Not normally, but it does on his for some reason
Naymliss (NA)
: This would make vel worse to play against as an immobile mage, I say no. Fizz would still be able to reaction dodge, as would other assassins with mobility, but immobile mages wouldn't be able to sidestep.
> [{quoted}](name=Naymliss,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=1upEo3B2,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-07-06T13:11:56.342+0000) > > This would make vel worse to play against as an immobile mage, I say no. Fizz would still be able to reaction dodge, as would other assassins with mobility, but immobile mages wouldn't be able to sidestep. That's a pretty good point tbh. Idk what should happen then :/
Rioter Comments
: What does ''Int'' mean
It means intentional feeding. Some community members get ridiculous and use it when people are doing badly.
Rioter Comments
Yenn (NA)
: Enemy just counterpicked my Vel'koz with Zed, I now have to dodge or take a loss
I play plenty of Vel'Koz. You have to be very careful not to overextend or get caught out. Stay further back and he shouldn't really be able to do what you're describing, plus you can still get a lot of damage off from long range. Unless he has way more mechanical skill than you, you should at least be able to avoid feeding. And yeah, Zhonya's is a good idea.
Rioter Comments
: Champions design went downside after {{champion:157}} 's release. They kept trying to add more flashy plays. The exception is {{champion:161}} and imo he's a perfectly designed mage.
> [{quoted}](name=Kurt Hyzan,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=1BYLealZ,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-06-14T14:02:58.967+0000) > > Champions design went downside after {{champion:157}} 's release. They kept trying to add more flashy plays. The exception is {{champion:161}} and imo he's a perfectly designed mage. That is true at least somewhat- it does seem like they're trying too hard to throw flashy mobility stuff around without worrying enough about the effect it's going to have. I don't think all champs since then (new Swain, new Xin, Xayah, etc) have been like that, but it's still a bit too prevalent. And I agree about Vel- he's high-risk/high-reward with clearly defined strengths and weaknesses, and he's really satisfying to make a good play on. He's just pretty weak at the moment.
Rioter Comments
: up vote or gay
this is the high quality content I'm on the boards for
: Just a quick question
Sorry, but Riot has a policy of never unbanning perma'd accounts under any circumstances (except for wrongly punished accounts). I don't speak for Riot, but any Rioter would tell you the same. Good luck with reforming!
: You guys are so naive believing whatever you are being told without thinking any further. I don't get how a rioter posting a line of code proves anything about the system functionality. A rioter could easily post a fake code line to decieve the masses into thinking that the system doesnt take into account the number of reports. Assuming i was the lead designer i would be very happy to consider the number of the reports, given i had convinced the community for the opposite. This way the report count would be a realible feature for the NN to be trained. Actually you don't get to be sure for anything in this game. You don't know if the loot system is pure luck or an AI driven algorithm trying to maximize the profit of the company, you don't even know how the matchmaking system works etc. Just keep in mind that for a system to work as desired you might have to hide the truth and decieve the masses. I can't prove anything of the above but you can't prove the opposite either. But the fact is that a company is trying to maximize its profit using both ethical and unethical means.
> [{quoted}](name=Winnie The Bro,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AZy6q0jN,comment-id=0008,timestamp=2018-06-03T13:19:39.796+0000) > > You guys are so naive believing whatever you are being told without thinking any further. I don't get how a rioter posting a line of code proves anything about the system functionality. A rioter could easily post a fake code line to decieve the masses into thinking that the system doesnt take into account the number of reports. Assuming i was the lead designer i would be very happy to consider the number of the reports, given i had convinced the community for the opposite. This way the report count would be a realible feature for the NN to be trained. > > Actually you don't get to be sure for anything in this game. You don't know if the loot system is pure luck or an AI driven algorithm trying to maximize the profit of the company, you don't even know how the matchmaking system works etc. > > Just keep in mind that for a system to work as desired you might have to hide the truth and decieve the masses. > > I can't prove anything of the above but you can't prove the opposite either. But the fact is that a company is trying to maximize its profit using both ethical and unethical means. And innocent people getting banned is not a way to maximize profits. That just doesn't make sense to let people drive other paying customers away.
Nakinto (NA)
: Scuffleboard, welcome to the forums, 1 report does not = 9. If just one person reports yes it goes to review, but if ALL 9 OTHER PLAYERS report, that when reviewed, is usually an "instant guilty", most people judging these things are "WOW he pissed off EVERYONE on BOTH teams?" Usually anything more then 3 reports in a single match is an 'instant guilty' verdict. Just one person being a lame troll makes those of us that review this stuff irritated at the reporter and Riot has made it bannable to falsely report.
> [{quoted}](name=Nakinto,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AZy6q0jN,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2018-06-02T22:30:22.422+0000) > > Scuffleboard, welcome to the forums, 1 report does not = 9. If just one person reports yes it goes to review, but if ALL 9 OTHER PLAYERS report, that when reviewed, is usually an "instant guilty", most people judging these things are "WOW he pissed off EVERYONE on BOTH teams?" Usually anything more then 3 reports in a single match is an 'instant guilty' verdict. Just one person being a lame troll makes those of us that review this stuff irritated at the reporter and Riot has made it bannable to falsely report. I've been on the forums before, and I've seen enough to convince me that it's true. Riot has given all the proof they can. I've never seen a case where someone was unfairly punished because a premade reported them. I've gotten feedback reports after being the only person to report (I think). Plus, why would Riot make a system that lets people kick out innocent players? Even from a business perspective it makes no sense.
Rioter Comments
Bultz (NA)
: Nerf Karma
Player who lands skillshots kills player who misses, busted
: > [{quoted}](name=Snapp2Kill,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=FbcaxQXB,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-05-15T11:02:19.985+0000) > > But the one on their team is always the challenger smurf boosting their college friend between classes. You know what i find funny ? I got downvoted by 7 people because i did say the fact, when one of this champions is picked on your side it mostly a lose for your team while as yourself said it if they on the other side they are pro somehow.
> [{quoted}](name=ValiantKiller,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=FbcaxQXB,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2018-05-15T11:21:54.902+0000) > > You know what i find funny ? > I got downvoted by 7 people because i did say the fact, when one of this champions is picked on your side it mostly a lose for your team while as yourself said it if they on the other side they are pro somehow. That's a meme. In reality it makes no sense.
: hello riot why i get the ban?
I hope this is a permaban.
Giorgos21Cy (EUNE)
: Banning your pick.
Another way to deal with this is to suggest something else. If they hovered Swain but have a 36% winrate on him, but you notice they have a 58% winrate in 80 Vel'Koz games, say something like "hey, don't you think an artillery mage would go well with our comp?" If they still don't change and you don't wanna play with that, then dodge away. But banning as the first option is just obnoxious.
: I got punished unfairly and I request for the punishment to get removed
> [{quoted}](name=Ale non è male,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=KFoGJEiu,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-05-03T10:05:39.607+0000) > > >Ale non è male: are u trolling? > Ale non è male: shaco??? > Ale non è male: wtf > Ale non è male: dude u are not playing > Ale non è male: i am laning alone > Ale non è male: don't start this bullshit > Ale non è male: u are not playing > Ale non è male: i am playing alone > Ale non è male: why the fuck pick shaco support if u are not doing anything in lane? > Ale non è male: WHAT? > Ale non è male: ARE U FUCKING SERIOUS? > Ale non è male: can you please tell them what the fuck was happening in the lane? > Ale non è male: yeah gg noob > Ale non è male: where the hell you go? > Ale non è male: do u have eyes to see? > Ale non è male: lmao nice reply > Ale non è male: it's more wint the game after you and shaco did everything to lose > Ale non è male: what? > Ale non è male: are u fucking serious? > Ale non è male: idiots > Ale non è male: report me for my deaths > Ale non è male: lmao > Ale non è male: these guys are clueless All of this is at least annoying, and a good chunk of it is harassment/verbal abuse. This will not be overturned.
: > [{quoted}](name=Arammus,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=okiPKNNR,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2018-05-03T09:39:07.949+0000) > > problem is you cant know for sure what his main account is. > so riot cant punish it. That is saddening I thought there would be a way of finding his other Accounts only because the T1 thingy. ;-; maaaannnnn
> [{quoted}](name=JimTheSnail,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=okiPKNNR,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2018-05-03T09:44:17.579+0000) > > That is saddening I thought there would be a way of finding his other Accounts only because the T1 thingy. ;-; maaaannnnn It's not really possible, the only accounts of T1's that were actually banned were the ones he streamed on, they didn't know about any others. His ID ban was effectively a ban from streaming.
: YES We have so many female champs in revealing stuff but all we get for the male champs is the shirtless Ionians(not that I'm complaing of course) and Trynd. Debonair is a start but it's not revealing, just attractive & well-dressed. There are too many good-looking men to keep them all dressed like nuns! Gragas is disgusting and Braum is old and bald so they don't count.
> [{quoted}](name=RockMeSexyJesus,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=ZB7ui7gM,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-04-28T20:11:01.411+0000) > > YES > We have so many female champs in revealing stuff but all we get for the male champs is the shirtless Ionians(not that I'm complaing of course) and Trynd. Debonair is a start but it's not revealing, just attractive & well-dressed. There are too many good-looking men to keep them all dressed like nuns! > Gragas is disgusting and Braum is old and bald so they don't count. Gragas is a beautiful man and doesn't need your hate, okay?
: What's the most hilarious toxic thing you've seen either on your team or in /all chat BMs?
A few days ago I tried to just go play a chill ARAM and my entire team was really touchy and yelling at each other. It went something like {{champion:78}} : Why didn't you trade with me, I boosted you asshole. hope your whole family dies {{champion:119}} (all) : Report Poppy for toxic {{champion:78}} : what the fuck I did nothing, report Draven for not trading {{champion:74}} : shut the fuck up both of you, I'm reporting everyone {{champion:119}} : I'm not gonna shut up until everyone reports this Poppy {{champion:78}} : Report me for what lol {{champion:74}} : You're both really annoying, burn in hell {{champion:114}} (me): Hey can you guys try and focus, we can win this {{champion:119}} : Okay so done with this team, report everyone {{champion:114}} (me again): uh what did I do {{champion:119}} : you don't help {{champion:119}} (all) : seriously, report everyone {{champion:78}} *A summoner has disconnected* {{champion:119}} (all) : report Poppy afk {{champion:74}} : shut up {{champion:74}} : *begins to int* {{champion:119}} (all) : seriously report everyone {{champion:119}} *A summoner has disconnected* {{champion:74}} : haha best game ever Never been happier to get that instant feedback report.
ai wo (NA)
: In a beginner game, a bot had literally inted
I had this too, and I think I saw it in a MagikarpUsedFly video.
Rioter Comments
: Stop chatbanning me Riot, I am only defending myself from Trollers!!!!!
Trolls are trying to get a reaction. You're giving them what they want. Don't do that.
: Hey guys! I found a new effective way on how to counter karthus' ult.
Nayzumi (NA)
: 20 minute leaver buster timers for 15 minute games, why?
If you only left twice, you would not have a leaverbuster. Riot understands that stuff comes up, but if you're leaving often enough to trigger a leaverbuster you need to improve your planning.
: > [{quoted}](name=Primaquarius,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=xWasUvwE,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-04-07T22:30:10.752+0000) > > 3 mage items, plus any stacking he may have done > > Normal damage Ah yes getting 100-0'd by someone who has a Luden and is going full tank and having 500+ ap is really balanced.
: Things that need nerfed.exe
> [{quoted}](name=1st Time Yasuo,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=nwK0aVM8,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-04-06T22:51:46.379+0000) > > {{champion:99}} stop buffing her ultimate every other patch I mean, I can agree with this...
Asterfix (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Scuffleboard,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=GnyGkXPT,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-04-05T07:47:35.120+0000) > > If he evolves that fast, you're fighting him way too much. I mean his q is kinda hard to dodge, it has the lowest CD and he can just noclip for health.
> [{quoted}](name=Asterfix,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=GnyGkXPT,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2018-04-05T08:02:30.185+0000) > > I mean his q is kinda hard to dodge, it has the lowest CD and he can just noclip for health. If you can avoid a lot of early direct combat with him- try and pick a longer ranged top like Urgot and stay back- you can set him back without even killing him once because his transformation will take forever to come.
Bluejrs (NA)
: I don't think action will be taken. If it is, it would take awhile after so many players have suffered.
> [{quoted}](name=Bluejrs,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=OcfEcXh3,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-04-05T11:29:25.079+0000) > > I don't think action will be taken. If it is, it would take awhile after so many players have suffered. In a case of blatant inting like that, I think that Riot's system, while flawed, would still pick it up. If you're really concerned, submit a support ticket and get it reviewed.
Bluejrs (NA)
: 5 Tears of Goddess and Mobis should have leaver buster take action.
If you report them, this should do better and ban them for 14 days. That's clear inting.
Show more

Scuffleboard

Level 31 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion