: > [{quoted}](name=SnakDatSmilesBak,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=Rfm7twsA,comment-id=000000000001,timestamp=2017-10-12T23:44:23.979+0000) > > Why is being an sjw even a bad thing smh I think because social justice has no real place in 2017 america. We've already doled out equality. No one is hindered by law anymore. No race, creed, sex is discriminated against insitutionally. So SJWs are basically seen as a bunch of people who have all the rights everyone else has, starting shit over nothing. They're just dividing people. They claim hatred and racism and sexism where there is none. Sure maybe there are people who hate certain races or ideals, but it's not law. So who the fuck are these people to tell other people how and what to think? You know? They come across as fascist thought police. They don't have a common enemy... They're like the first group that is fighting against the PUBLIC. Their peers. Not a government entity or a law, they're protesting OTHER CIVILIANS' thoughts!! They're arrogant and controlling. It's unamerican. Freedom of thought and speech is the foundation of America. Yet they seem to want to control people's thoughts and speech. I hated and still do hate the label "SJW", as well as "White knight", because these sound like good things. Yes, social justice, who could disagree with social justice??? And then you see the things they're fighting for and it's like wow, this isn't social justice, this is just a cry for attention. There's nothing being fought except made up things and natural processes of a society with millions of people. You can't fix everything, and life can be cruel. You have to take the bad with the good. And the things they're fighting for are unrealistic and unreachable. You can never convince me that if you have a vagina, look like a woman, sound like a woman, and you were a woman when you introduced me to you, that now you're suddenly genderless, even though nothing has changed physically about you. (Speaking from personal experience interacting with sjw PC punks at shows). Yet this is what they want to convince people of. It's non scientific bullshit, and if you don't agree with it, SJWs will shame you for not believing in it. And they will call you a bigot, sexist, hatred filled monster. It's really disgusting. And this is why people don't like SJWs. Maybe that's the minority just spoiling it for the bunch. I really wish people could somehow just show SJWs and the regressive left that we don't have a problem with eachother. Most people are tolerant and give 0 fucks if you're black, white, gay, trans, whatever... I wish we could just all collectively give a big middle finger to them and tell em to stop wasting time, effort, media exposure, on these pointless protests and fights over problems that don't exist, so we can focus on real problems. They're just a distraction... we have such bigger issues going on. Wars, government corruption, taxes, foreign policies... no, let's focus on fucking RACISM?! IN 2017?! I don't even know any racists, except like my dad... but even then, he doesn't want segregation and inequality... he doesn't want them to be hindered by law, he just doesn't like hanging out with black people, big fucking deal. Who is anyone to tell him that's wrong?! Oh right, SJWs, that's who. Fucking 19 year old, privileged children, telling a 55 year old man with a family who worked all his life, that he's a racist piece of shit. It's arrogant and delusional.
Bruh if I was you I'd be so embarrassed.
: > [{quoted}](name=SnakDatSmilesBak,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=Rfm7twsA,comment-id=000000000001,timestamp=2017-10-12T23:44:23.979+0000) > > Why is being an sjw even a bad thing smh I think because social justice has no real place in 2017 america. We've already doled out equality. No one is hindered by law anymore. No race, creed, sex is discriminated against insitutionally. So SJWs are basically seen as a bunch of people who have all the rights everyone else has, starting shit over nothing. They're just dividing people. They claim hatred and racism and sexism where there is none. Sure maybe there are people who hate certain races or ideals, but it's not law. So who the fuck are these people to tell other people how and what to think? You know? They come across as fascist thought police. They don't have a common enemy... They're like the first group that is fighting against the PUBLIC. Their peers. Not a government entity or a law, they're protesting OTHER CIVILIANS' thoughts!! They're arrogant and controlling. It's unamerican. Freedom of thought and speech is the foundation of America. Yet they seem to want to control people's thoughts and speech. I hated and still do hate the label "SJW", as well as "White knight", because these sound like good things. Yes, social justice, who could disagree with social justice??? And then you see the things they're fighting for and it's like wow, this isn't social justice, this is just a cry for attention. There's nothing being fought except made up things and natural processes of a society with millions of people. You can't fix everything, and life can be cruel. You have to take the bad with the good. And the things they're fighting for are unrealistic and unreachable. You can never convince me that if you have a vagina, look like a woman, sound like a woman, and you were a woman when you introduced me to you, that now you're suddenly genderless, even though nothing has changed physically about you. (Speaking from personal experience interacting with sjw PC punks at shows). Yet this is what they want to convince people of. It's non scientific bullshit, and if you don't agree with it, SJWs will shame you for not believing in it. And they will call you a bigot, sexist, hatred filled monster. It's really disgusting. And this is why people don't like SJWs. Maybe that's the minority just spoiling it for the bunch. I really wish people could somehow just show SJWs and the regressive left that we don't have a problem with eachother. Most people are tolerant and give 0 fucks if you're black, white, gay, trans, whatever... I wish we could just all collectively give a big middle finger to them and tell em to stop wasting time, effort, media exposure, on these pointless protests and fights over problems that don't exist, so we can focus on real problems. They're just a distraction... we have such bigger issues going on. Wars, government corruption, taxes, foreign policies... no, let's focus on fucking RACISM?! IN 2017?! I don't even know any racists, except like my dad... but even then, he doesn't want segregation and inequality... he doesn't want them to be hindered by law, he just doesn't like hanging out with black people, big fucking deal. Who is anyone to tell him that's wrong?! Oh right, SJWs, that's who. Fucking 19 year old, privileged children, telling a 55 year old man with a family who worked all his life, that he's a racist piece of shit. It's arrogant and delusional.
My friend you're wrong on multiple fronts. First of all, racism is still a massive problem in places. Gender is psychological, it's in a person's mind. Notice I said mind and not brain. To say that gender-self in the mind don't exist demonstrates a lack of understanding of the workings of the mind. I don't see protesting against anybody or anything (even against peers) as a problem. The brain is so unbelievably complicated. It can be hard to believe that miniscule chemical differences can cause someone to feel like a man or woman, but they do sometimes. Also you and your dad are so racist that it makes me wonder if your post was just some elaborate copypasta. You're the delusional one here and it makes me a little bit sad that you're already 55 and still believe that stuff.
Chermorg (NA)
: There’s no need to call people SJW for trying to help others understand why they were punished. Further, it’s not being a “social justice warrior” to simply expect people to be respectful to each other on the Rift.
Why is being an sjw even a bad thing smh
Toshiai (NA)
: ya i've been visiting jack and the captain a lot too its funny i win more when im drunk than when im not
: This game has successfully made me attend Therapy against depression
Ok first of all, go drink a really really really fucking good milkshake. Eat a nice sandwich, maybe toss some fries down your mouth. Second, realize that the problem isn't the game it is you. Third, either learn to live with and love yourself or better yourself in healthy ways. Easier said than done, good luck. Make pheace with your journey.
Nymzo (NA)
: The problem is that Coin is SUPPOSED to give more gold. It's the whole point of this item since it gives the worst stat out of 3. It's not how much it gives, it's how you get the gold.
I agree with this. I think coin is fine but the other support items should be reworked.
: They really, **really** don't want to nerf the gold generation for some reason.
It's called coin, it makes sense to me that it's the best in terms of making coin. Now if the other two support items were reworked to be stronger in combat, then that might solve issues imo.
: > [{quoted}](name=SnakDatSmilesBak,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=c3K40ZOY,comment-id=0003000000000001000000000000,timestamp=2017-10-10T18:41:20.882+0000) > > I took that to mean "there's no difference between threatening teammates and inting." But I think you're right on this one Finding a way to make it fun and still play with a jerk team mate is not the same as inting
> [{quoted}](name=MadameMoistress,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=c3K40ZOY,comment-id=00030000000000010000000000000001,timestamp=2017-10-11T11:00:14.853+0000) > > Finding a way to make it fun and still play with a jerk team mate is not the same as inting Then you and I have different ideas of fun
hammer3 (NA)
: if your gonna troll in norms please do it with a 5 man so i dont have to be on your team
Trolling is an art. You've described something that isn't trolling. You're trolling.
: I just want to mention that Cho'gath's E does % max HP in an AoE, has a low cooldown, costs little to nothing of his resource bar, scales as the game goes on, slows, and is conditionless. Yes. Cho'gath's E is a better version of Shen's Q. He is literally a better duelist than Shen in lane, when that is the one f*cking reason to actually play Shen over other tanks (pre-6, of course). Thanks Riot. (And please, do mention something about 'the champs do different things!' Because I have a god damned essay to write for anybody who would dare use that argument here.)
: Knowing how insane people are, a jerk ADC would probably say something along the lines of "Fine, fucking do it. I'll buy it myself." And then they slowly realize that they had made a critical error in judgment.
> [{quoted}](name=My Pet Dinosaur,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=c3K40ZOY,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2017-10-10T15:50:55.647+0000) > > Knowing how insane people are, a jerk ADC would probably say something along the lines of "Fine, fucking do it. I'll buy it myself." > > And then they slowly realize that they had made a critical error in judgment. Eh sometimes I decide my ego is more important than winning and ill get a sightstone on adc if my supp neglects it.
Jharr (NA)
: How to make good support items
I agree with buffing supports instead of allies. But how will this work? What will keep solo laners from abusing these new items? Let's see your ideas on the other support items?
Jharr (NA)
: Kind of obvious you didn't read the post. Maybe skimmed it but certainly did not read it through. I never once said that items were not impactful. Try reading first before being rude and accusing people of complaining.
I've found that on these boards, most people will not read a post thoroughly enough to comprehend it.
: > [{quoted}](name=SnakDatSmilesBak,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=c3K40ZOY,comment-id=00030000000000010000,timestamp=2017-10-10T15:46:54.457+0000) > > Wasting gold is a big enough drawback to cost a game. He didn't say always so i don't think the guy is over - exaggerating Look at how he is arguing: > [{quoted}](name=Face The Win,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=c3K40ZOY,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2017-10-10T08:02:44.359+0000) > > Translation: > "If a teammate is being a jerk, threaten them by saying you'll int" > > There's no difference really _"There's no difference really"_ This is the sort of argument made by people who are so entrenched in the meta that they think it is okay to tell someone to kill themselves for playing anything even remotely wrong or not in-meta.
> [{quoted}](name=HalcyonDweller,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=c3K40ZOY,comment-id=000300000000000100000000,timestamp=2017-10-10T15:47:52.872+0000) > > Look at how he is arguing: > > _"There's no difference really"_ > > This is the sort of argument made by people who are so entrenched in the meta that they think it is okay to tell someone to kill themselves for playing anything even remotely wrong or not in-meta. I took that to mean "there's no difference between threatening teammates and inting." But I think you're right on this one
: I played rakan yesterday, trash adc of mine got caught out 3 times so i left bot all together ganked mid... got kill and tower, went top got kill and tower. Instead of doing the "right" thing and losing my lane further i went top. I used my macro knowledge to carry the game as a low dmg support, for lvl 30s(one lvl 28 who fed arse off) while other team was silvers. The difference is you and your mindset not matchmaking. Im on winning streak and was the only silver 5 in the game rest were silver 3 to 2ish. Had most dmg in game, took 4 towers, destroyed my laner on his main etc etc. You make the difference
anecdote, you can't use this to say op is wrong
Durzaka (NA)
: So then why are you looking at Censors efficiency without passives and actives?
Errastas (NA)
: Someone gets it.
I feel like its not as cut and dry as this. Theres probably a combination of factors with this just being one factor.
: > [{quoted}](name=CoeAstral,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=HiV8tNrd,comment-id=00040000000000000000,timestamp=2017-10-10T11:50:54.475+0000) > > {{champion:12}} This is engaging. A support who requires heavy resource management thanks to his low mana pool, stuns, and ability to go in, along with his sustain and specialized teamfighting ult. Yes he'll buy some items, but rarely overdo it on direct pure support items. > > {{champion:40}} / {{champion:16}} / {{champion:117}} with {{item:3190}} {{item:3504}} {{item:2045}} {{item:3107}} {{item:3222}} {{item:3158}} is NOT engaging. These champions in almost all cases rarely have heavily mechanical base gameplay and just point and click on things for results, and even if the skillshot misses, both have major inputs in fights without even thinking about it. Their pools of mana aren't hard to control, Soraka's regen is so strong most carries have a hard time putting her down lategame, and Janna denies all-in team combonations simply due to her style of play, and Soraka negates a majority of major damage plays thanks to her bonuses. Lulu experiences the same problem as Janna, and all these supports were problematic in the first place. A direct buff or change to their gameplay is required, so we can nerf their ridiculously strong aspects of the meta right now, as a single ardent can dictate an entire game > > when ADCs build {{item:3097}} just to rush their Lulu/Janna/Soraka support along > **THERE'S A F-CKING PROBLEM** I'd agree there is a problem with 2 players using an income item on the same team. Perhaps only supports should be able to buy it? Also - heres a Novel idea that most league players haven't figured out yet - KILL THE ENCHANTER SUPPORT FIRST. {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}}
Yes kill the soraka sitting behind her adc. In fact, kill her before you kill a tank or her apc or her adc.
: > [{quoted}](name=Face The Win,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=c3K40ZOY,comment-id=000300000000,timestamp=2017-10-10T08:24:22.172+0000) > > The gold being wasted by selling an item as well as the deficeit of not having an ardent when the enemy does is enough to lose a game No it's not lol. Stop over-exaggerating. Maybe it would in some cases, but certainly not all. The world isn't black and white, good and evil, perfect and shitty. Don't be so simple-minded.
> [{quoted}](name=HalcyonDweller,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=c3K40ZOY,comment-id=0003000000000001,timestamp=2017-10-10T15:35:15.856+0000) > > No it's not lol. Stop over-exaggerating. Maybe it would in some cases, but certainly not all. The world isn't black and white, good and evil, perfect and shitty. Don't be so simple-minded. Wasting gold is a big enough drawback to cost a game. He didn't say always so i don't think the guy is over - exaggerating
: Welcome to low elo of high elo! No, but for real, good fckin' job dude. Hitting Platinum's a struggle, now make sure you don't lose it! Keep striving for Diamond, you got this!
Noooooo don't listen to this guy! Get out while you still can!
Chermorg (NA)
: I've seen some cases where a punishment looks like it was escalated for disability related hate speech - I.e 14 day ban out of the blue and only one log provided. But I agree that those words really need to stop being said in League.
I disagree that these words need to stop being said in league. I think riot shouldn't allow offensive use of the words but should still allow the words themselves.
: Smh. I cant wait till people are demanding the words fat or lazy be added to the permaban list as well after all we must protect the feefees. What a sad state this generation is causing. Luckily time has shown if a generation goes bonkers about a subject the next generation will be the complete opposite.
I think we should do away with the "permaban list" and focus only on how people are using the word on that list. If they're used offensively, ban. If they're not used offensively then no ban. The same way we'd treat any other words.
Jharr (NA)
: How to make good support items
I think interactive buffs for adcs would be ok. I think the problem is hidden buffs like ardent or knight's vow don't give the enemy any space to react. For example, you can wait out a locket shield, but you can't wait out knight's vow or ardent (holy shit Janna and lulu shields last way too long).
: I'm sorry, please let me know what I could do to change that.
First of all, don't apologize to me for pointing this out. Second, good for you that you are open to criticism, I respect that. Third, good representation isn't going to happen without a big sample size so you're not likely to get that here anyways, but you'll at least be able to see what boards members think. Your entire post is clearly biased. You start by describing the problem you face, and then go on to ask if others share the problem. In your poll, there's no option for people who want shorter games, only options for longer/like it rn. To remove the bias and get a better representation of what people think about this topic you'd have to do a few things. First, either remove the bias in the post itself or equally support both sides of the issue. The easiest way to do this is make your question (and post) as concise as possible, and do not support either side. Something like, "How long should a league game be?" might work better. If you want to add context you should try to make it shorter than your question and just include the key points of the survey. (Try to avoid swaying opinions) Then, for a poll you could use a list of time intervals spaced 5 minutes apart, perhaps ranging from 15 minutes to 50. A number line system could limit the effects of phrasing and word choice in your poll. Good luck homie
: Are games nowadays too short?
Holy shit this is so biased, you're not going to get good representation here. Your poll is especially problematic.
: As some one who has played aatrox for years this should stop happening to melees when ranged champions never get this treatment
Rioter Comments
Quepha (NA)
: Riot doesn't seem interested in improving party finding functions within the client. They killed chatrooms and never reimplemented them despite it being a really simple system, and clubs which were seen as the replacement still have ridiculously small player limits. I guess the game isn't supposed to have support for League communities.
I think the client update was a higher priority, maybe things will change now.
Rioter Comments
: Get out {{sticker:slayer-jinx-unamused}}
Rioter Comments
: got home, got on my computer, saw a new mission
Are they all supposed to give tokens or is it supposed to just be like a quest system?
: game randomly ended
Weird af, did you talk to any of the enemies to see what it was like from their end?
: And you felt the need to post about here because?
> [{quoted}](name=TouchFluffyTaiI,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=AcPY5Ewi,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-09-29T20:44:39.429+0000) > > And you felt the need to post about here because? Because it's lol related ^_^ loosen up brotha
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
create28 (NA)
: Support yorick?
I climbed from bronze to plat maining support yorick. It's really good if your adc trusts you, I've taken towers as early as 3 minutes. If they don't follow up or just all-around suck, then it's fine because your ganks are decent and late game you can fall back on splitting with your ult. Never go coin, always take relic shield. Start w vs enchanters. Start q with grasp against melees. W second is better than e second, most of the time.
: been playing for ~1-1.5 years but I still belong in bronze
Meta doesn't matter as much as actually improving does. Figure out how you do things and do them well enough to win.
: Bard's body is artificial. Not like, android artificial. It's made out of stuff he found held together by cosmic power.
> [{quoted}](name=Social Justice 1,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=vxezbIxY,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2017-09-28T00:10:50.141+0000) > > Bard's body is artificial. Not like, android artificial. It's made out of stuff he found held together by cosmic power. Sooo matter? Just like everything else?
: GD music thread
https://youtu.be/C1D3G2VGQ_8 https://youtu.be/cNUsxoxoAHs
: Maybe in some sort of 1v1 early, but i dont see how a Yorick is gonna kill a Kog with Bork and Guinsoos, in a 1v1, especially a Kog that is with a nami and his whole team.
I really think you guys are underestimating yorick damage late game. Plus walking away from an immobile carry for a few seconds can also work.
: it's so that you aren't constantly warding to keep track of her, basically less oppressive early.
Warding her camps and picking a strong dueling jg was a good way to keep her down and required teamwork. I really liked that about old eve.
Rebonack (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=bleufromage,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=1sjjM1ez,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2017-09-27T16:31:43.668+0000) > > Part of why eve being picked was that everyone in the game had to change the way they play because they had no idea where she was. She had enormous pressure just because of who she was. That's not fair to have influence on every lane so early. You also shouldn't be forced to buy an early sight ward when gold is so scarce. Well, yeah. That's why she was picked. That's her whole niche. What exactly is the point of picking her now? It'll come down to who's move overtuned if you want an AP burst Jungler, Elise or Eve since they both do exactly the same thing.
> [{quoted}](name=Rebonack,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=1sjjM1ez,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2017-09-27T16:34:18.656+0000) > Elise or Eve since they both do exactly the same thing. This is wrong.
: > [{quoted}](name=SnakDatSmilesBak,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=b8fYIH9M,comment-id=001800000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-09-27T16:25:42.780+0000) > > When someone's tilted enough to start inting, I'm probably going to call them out on it. They already know what they're doing. It's not like they think they're not inting if they're inting. > > Totally right about tilt, but at that point it doesn't really matter. The problem with assuming that they are inting is twofold. If they are not inting, and just severely tilted, they are just going to react worse out of anger at being misunderstood and unfairly accused of something, and if they are inting you are just giving them attention for it and giving them a reason to do it more (because lashing out appears to be working to get others to pay attention to their frustration). It is much more effective to shift over to their side, appear as an ally, then bring them back to rational cooperation with the rest of the team by making them feel like a part of the whole.
Yup I get what you're saying. I call em out on it and ignore em after that. I don't respect assumptions so I don't make em, I only say someone's inting when they actually are. Inting is intentional feeding, no amount of teamwork is likely to overcome such a deficit. Frankly, I think it's worthless to try and work with someone who's inting. I call it out, mute, play, report, move on. Mad respect for you btw, keep it up
: You brought nothing to this conversation and infect wasted everyone's time who read this, remove yourself.
Get off your high horse. You do not hold the authority to tell this person to remove himself. Someone who is confident in themselves doesn't feel the need to tell others to remove themselves for their opinion.
: > [{quoted}](name=Jayceonmyface,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=b8fYIH9M,comment-id=0018000000000000,timestamp=2017-09-27T09:26:13.794+0000) > > Tilt is a concept that derives from League, I don't understand it because in the real world we use English. Tilt may be a restricted term, but the actual effect is called Emotional Flooding. This is when a person becomes emotionally unstable and makes worse and worse decisions, creating a downward spiral of becoming more stressed and making worse mistakes. It isn't exclusive to league of legends, athletes in major sports can suffer from it all the time, people who game the stock market can become similarly afflicted, and posters and commenters on social media can argue themselves into a corner and humiliate themselves not of their own free will, but out of an emotional overreaction that overrides rational thought. It is a fact of human nature, and it is something that ought to be taken into consideration when interacting with people who may be suffering its effects. Since it can affect the outcome of your interactions with them. > Now, what you're doing is molly coddling, molly coddling is when you baby someone, who did something wrong or not correct to a degree and go "Better luck next time, it's okay you'll do fine" rather than berating them and giving them the facts as to how they messed up, this is why the community is so messed up right now, you're all children, worse than that, you're hugbox children. > > There is a million reasons to single a person out, it humbles them, it makes them look bad, it puts them in the spot light to either bow out or toughen up and get better. We do this to create men, it's called survival of the fittest. OK, so basically people are either 'weak' or 'strong' and they ought to be poked and prodded when it is appropriate in order to make them shape up or drop out? You are entitled to have that opinion, but tell me something; How is that working out for you? Do people shape up? or do they overreact and ruin your game further? I'm arguing based on results, not just based on how people should or shouldn't be treated. In my own experience, players tilt less and are much less likely to ruin my game if I am friendly and polite to them from the get-go. A little respect and understanding shown can go a long way.
When someone's tilted enough to start inting, I'm probably going to call them out on it. They already know what they're doing. It's not like they think they're not inting if they're inting. Totally right about tilt, but at that point it doesn't really matter.
Knalxz (NA)
: Why does the new Eve's stealth only activate at 6+?
: When you say support budget does this mean you had a ADC beside you helping you do the damage and your team being fed in a 2v2or did this Kog actually solo you in a 1v1 and was behind because he lost his lane?
It was a 1v1 just kog and I. All I had was locket and the shield supp item, he had a bork. If I had trinity force or black cleaver, then kog wouldn't have lived long enough to make it close. You act like kog is always capable of melting people when really the skill that he uses has a cooldown. It's not that hard to wait it out when in a 1v1.
: In that case i raise you frozen mallet + phantom dancer yas. Is he suddenly a tank? No, neither is kog, on equal terms yasuo who manages to ult kog 1v1 should win espacially when he has an ability that basiclly shuts his entire damage
Ahris (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Avarist,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=kcEEoyVq,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2017-09-27T03:33:06.266+0000) > > Context matters. Was the kog fed? What items did you have? What items did he have? What did your windwall block? Did you fight in a creep wave? Did you miss any Q's? > > Kog'maw takes a long time to come online though compared to Yasuo so I get the feeling he killed you with his gold differential. Sometimes gold > skill. I played kog maw and i did really good damage even when I was behind. Was able to 1v1 a Lux 100-0 while you can say she did not land her full burst. I was 3-14 i believe? With only full item blade if I remember right. That isn't rlly fair especially from 710 range.
I think it's fair. Most champs, whatever their scores and aside from some supports, will be able to 1v1 a lux if she misses her ult.
Show more

SnakDatSmilesBak

Level 30 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion