kmada (NA)
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=kmada,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=1FmBc5p3,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-07-12T22:03:45.818+0000) > > I just wanna point out that in a reasonable enlightened society this is actually a dog shit way to think. > > It would be like saying if you got jumped by 4 people, if you throw a swing back to defend yourself you are 100% just as guilty and deserve the same punishment. > > > You should have just taken the beating sir. > > lol ... except in that situation you are physically in danger, likewise, there's no button to click to instantly remove all the attackers. If you want to relate it to real life a better example would be if someone said you were shit at your job, so you ran up to a toddler and screamed "fuck that guy" in its face.
zPOOPz (NA)
: > The argument against is that there are thousands of games happening at one time so what would a team of say 10 GMs do. My counter would be, any system to address would be better then none and would garner some good faith that Riot is attempting to do something. I would argue any system that only address 10 games while ignoring the other 990 games is extremely unfair vs a system that treats all 1000 games fairly.
> [{quoted}](name=zPOOPz,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=sgEAvZTG,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2019-07-12T21:15:41.375+0000) > > I would argue any system that only address 10 games while ignoring the other 990 games is extremely unfair vs a system that treats all 1000 games fairly. At any one time in NYC hundreds, if not thousands, of cars are parked illegally. However, only a handful will receive tickets/fines. Would you suggest they do nothing since the vast majority get away with it?
dAsKiLzZ (NA)
: How can we improve the system to stop inters/griefers?
I would have a gm system kind of like wow. On the scoreboard would be a contact gm button. Once contacted, a GM could enter live spectator mode and if an actionable offense was found could issue a 14 or perm after game. There could also be a strike system set up for people that abused the feature, maybe 2 strikes and you lose the ability to summon a GM for 90 days or something. The argument against is that there are thousands of games happening at one time so what would a team of say 10 GMs do. My counter would be, any system to address would be better then none and would garner some good faith that Riot is attempting to do something.
: Which would you prefer?
In a hypothetical situation where someone had to flame to play god like vs having an inter, I would take the flamer. That being said, I would still mute (and depending on the type of flame report.
VapuIa (NA)
: I hate this game, I hate you people.
Did you just assume my species? I'm just curious how raging and flaming on trolls/inters helps the situation. You are aware that your tears and moaning is what fuels them, right?
dAsKiLzZ (NA)
: Is it bannable to play off meta strats or champs?
Not going to downvote, but tempting as you don't seem to be looking for answers, rather just arguing position sans care for evidence. However. 1st question, I think ashe supp taking CS might be bannable. The reason "off meta" is sometimes banned is that it puts you team at a disadvantage if they aren't made aware of it first thing in champ select. Champ picks, rune set up, etc are made with certain expectations. The "no one's CS" statement is usually in reponse to an adc complaining about a support taking ANY cs. It's a little more sketchy when the support is actively CSing (especially since some of the support starting items punish you for CS). There's no concrete statement from Riot concerning what is bannable in terms of "off meta". They only recommend that if you think your strategy may require explanation that you do so first thing in champ select. Likewise, if you say your intentions and the team disagrees, and you still so it, this may become punishable. Lastly, to the Nubrac situation. He didn't communicate his intentions in champ select or if he did he disregarded team feedback. Riot also found that his "off meta" picks had a high correlation to if a streamer was present in game. If one was, he tended to do "off meta". The noncordination, coupled with the attention seeking attempts to rile up streamers, is what lead to punishment. Edit: Should have read further as others covered Nubrac.
: Riot, it's time to actually do something about AFK players in Ranked Games.
Good plan, no way this would be abusable by duos. Likewise, are you prepared to not get a win if the enemy had an afk? Statistically speaking, there's a higher probability you will play against an afker than have one on your team (assuming you don't afk).
Rhibbit (NA)
: 14 day ban
0/13, level 8 in a plus 20 minute game, and no cs for the last 6 minutes of the game. It looks like you just stopped playing, which is assisting the enemy team, which falls under the intentional feeding punishment ( they don't have a separate one). Edit: It looks like something screwy went on in champ select, where the Yi and karth were supposed to trade but didnt. Either way, it seems the punishment was correct, and that you aren't being upfront about the game. Edit 2: I was partially wrong, in the final 6 minutes you died 3 out of 4 times to towers. So it looks like you weren't afk, you were probably just ulting to towers and dying.
Granark (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=SupportPlank,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=A6HwVwYx,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-05-22T17:18:33.513+0000) > > I think they should make MPs more visible, like when a pick is locked in so we have the proper information to consider dodging. Dodging is another negative player behavior that should not be advocated as it increases queue times for everyone and leads to less balanced games based on statistical cherry picking.
> [{quoted}](name=Granark,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=A6HwVwYx,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-05-22T17:23:58.848+0000) > > Dodging is another negative player behavior that should not be advocated as it increases queue times for everyone and leads to less balanced games based on statistical cherry picking. Well I don't know about statistical cherry picking, but if I had known my mid and top had a combined 3300 MP I would have dodged and saved myself 35 mins and 18 LP.
Granark (NA)
: Constant Mastery Point Bullying
I think they should make MPs more visible, like when a pick is locked in so we have the proper information to consider dodging.
: THERE SHOULD BE NO CHAT BANS GIVEN EVER EXCEPT...
Cool original idea that had never been stated on this forum before.
: A pretty strange situation with an extremely toxic player.
Soooo you knew what was going to happen by accepting the friend request, you then kept going with it for AN HOUR at least, and now want to report him. Even if the chat was horrid, I feel like you've opted into it at that point... probably all yall should be at last 14 day banned... Lol isn't a GD chat line Edit: My bad, you didn't say an hour, you said hours.... you really got nothing better to do then sit in a voice chat with people speaking a different langauge and flaming for hours?
rujitra (NA)
: Dodging
You want to see dodges, try playing GP support. I don't even pre show my pick.. I also get a decent amount of dodges out of ashe and twitch supports. Basically I'm a support main that hates playing "supports".
flying (NA)
: LET US DISABLE CHAT FOR OURSELVES
There's been ways to disable your enter key in LoL for years now. If you were serious about having and using that option, I would have thought you would have at least attempted to google search that information well before you got to permaban status.
ßåd (NA)
: Or, i can do exactly what i did, and post this here to bring awareness to the shitty IFS - if you dont like it dont read it. 4head.
> [{quoted}](name=ßåd,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=alqU3dKi,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-05-06T19:48:04.943+0000) > > Or, i can do exactly what i did, and post this here to bring awareness to the shitty IFS - if you dont like it dont read it. 4head. Anicdotal evidence is the worst kind, bring more if you expect more. You sound like you need some deep breath exercises, maybe go for a jog or try hot yoga. Blessings
ßåd (NA)
: I like how
> [{quoted}](name=ßåd,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=alqU3dKi,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-05-06T19:40:41.427+0000) > > http://prntscr.com/nl8j9r > > This guy here in his troll veigar game can tell me to kill myself, kill myself on live TV so he can watch it and the world would be a better place is STILL playing games after that, but i can call someone an asshole for banning my champ pick and im INSTANTLY punished after the game. Nice automated system u got there riot. Not allowed to call soeone an asshole, but wanna tell them to off themselves on a live broadcast? feel free.... Cool story, open a support ticket.
ßåd (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=rujitra,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=b6NW6eBG,comment-id=0002000100000000,timestamp=2019-05-06T19:33:01.745+0000) > > You completely missed the point of the analogy. The analogy is that you cannot control what happens in a public place, thus nobody should *expect* Riot to police the subjects talked about. > > Policing being a jerk is normal and expected. Policing someone's ability to talk about a subject in a public place? Not so much. Except they arent discussing shit, they are doing it to be a twat, so again, that analogy is booty cheeks. Spoiling movies/episodes of stuff should result in a mute. its not game discussion. they arent talking about their gameplay, u get banned for everything else u say that isnt gameplay related, why not that too?
> [{quoted}](name=ßåd,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=b6NW6eBG,comment-id=00020001000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-06T19:38:17.680+0000) > > Except they arent discussing shit, they are doing it to be a twat, so again, that analogy is booty cheeks. Spoiling movies/episodes of stuff should result in a mute. its not game discussion. they arent talking about their gameplay, u get banned for everything else u say that isnt gameplay related, why not that too? Not true, you can talk about whatever you wish as long as you don't spam and aren't toxic.
: Can you report someone for spoiling GoT episodes?
I wish I knew or cared anything about GoT, I would start each game with the spoilers.
: Then player support should elucidate what exactly gave me the 10 game chat restrict, instead of solely drawing attention to my use of the word "Spaniard". This is a fault on their part, not on mine.
> [{quoted}](name=Kumungu Queen,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=54T4EZ9n,comment-id=000100010001000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-06T19:12:18.255+0000) > > Then player support should elucidate what exactly gave me the 10 game chat restrict, instead of solely drawing attention to my use of the word "Spaniard". This is a fault on their part, not on mine. Aye, which is what I mentioned in my first post. The length of the punishment suggests the agent was mistaken.
: The reasons given for the punishment in the other thread are not satisfactory to me, especially given the response from player support. I am here to talk about the word "Spaniard" being a so called Zero Tolerance Phrase. It should not be. It is a mistake.
> [{quoted}](name=Kumungu Queen,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=54T4EZ9n,comment-id=0001000100010000,timestamp=2019-05-06T18:59:39.485+0000) > > The reasons given for the punishment in the other thread are not satisfactory to me, especially given the response from player support. I am here to talk about the word "Spaniard" being a so called Zero Tolerance Phrase. It should not be. It is a mistake. It isnt, or you would have a 14 day ban.
: I'm going to keep pushing the issue. There is absolutely no way in hell I get a 14 day ban for using the word Spaniard.
> [{quoted}](name=Kumungu Queen,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=54T4EZ9n,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-05-06T18:55:37.671+0000) > > I'm going to keep pushing the issue. There is absolutely no way in hell I get a 14 day ban for using the word Spaniard. Do as you wish, just offering up advice, which is why I assumed you made the thread. Carry on.
: Can you report someone for spoiling GoT episodes?
: Hi, I'm the original "absolutely unnacceptable and completely livid" guy.
I'm not sure that the support agent was entirely correct in stating that your punishment was only because of the word spainard, if that is what the said. As mentioned above, a zero tolerance i.e. racism would have resulted in a 14 day ban. I'm not sure I would keep pushing the issue because if Riot deems it a zero tolerance phrase, fyi I don't, then the correct punishment would be an escalation to 14 days.
: Undeserved chat restriction - Chat log inside
Where is Tantram when you need his sweet ass? 25 days is to long.
: I got 14 day suspension. But why?
Melee support has nothing to do with it, though I'm not sure how you figured you would obtain gold with no support item. You died at: 1 min, 2 min, 3 min, 5 min (good job not dying during the 4th minute), 6 min, 8 min (twice), 9 min You managed 8 deaths in 9 minutes, that's not "soaking damage", which also might make more sense if you had a defensive item, that is feeding.
: How come riot only punishes the one type of toxicity that can be remedied with one click of a button
Another issue is that the IFS is a machine learning system. Perhaps if people didn't report for inting just because someone got out matched in a lane, then the system might work better.
: > [{quoted}](name=SupportPlank,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PPjRnnyd,comment-id=000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-23T00:27:34.914+0000) > > I've had 3 10 game chat restrictions, 2 25 game chat restrictions and 1 14 day ban. > If we are talking anicdotal evidence I think I have more experience then you. Your presumptions are astonishing. You don't know anything about me. Are you psychic? Unlike you, I don't arrogantly devalue other people's experiences.
> [{quoted}](name=WarmAndCrispy,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PPjRnnyd,comment-id=0000000100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-23T01:30:36.747+0000) > > Your presumptions are astonishing. You don't know anything about me. Are you psychic? Unlike you, I don't arrogantly devalue other people's experiences. Unlike you I'm not in "prisoner's island", have fun chief.
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=WarmAndCrispy,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PPjRnnyd,comment-id=00000001000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-22T23:50:05.743+0000) > > whatever you say bud. 10 games in row going full mute not typing a word and my teams going an average of 2/15 WHILE I DONT TYPE ANYTHING. yea that's totally me being toxic. You're so right, I'm being toxic by not typing. You must know everything. Better spread your light and share your wisdom you 2000iq genius. it must just be a silly coincidence. I've had 3 10 game chat restrictions, 2 25 game chat restrictions and 1 14 day ban. If we are talking anicdotal evidence I think I have more experience then you.
: > [{quoted}](name=Umbral Regent,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PPjRnnyd,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2019-04-22T07:24:07.782+0000) > > Well, I just gave you the word straight from Riot, they don't use Prisoner's Island-type concepts in their punishment system. So, if you don't believe Riot's own public statements on the matter, and adamantly insist that your beliefs are fact, and that anything that doesn't corroborate your assertions are lies - _Even if Riot explicitly says, "we don't do this, here's why;"_... > > Then yes, you did come here looking for yesman answers. You flat-out deny anything which doesn't align with your assumptions, and clearly have no intention of challenging your own assumptions to understand the situation better. > > That is anecdotal evidence, and you have a clear bias - particularly against Riot; > > So given that you're using anecdotal evidence of personal experiences (which are naturally subject to personal bias, since any negative incident will doubtless only serve to reaffirm your preconceived notions to you) and have your antagonistic bias towards Riot, you'll have to pardon my saying this, but your "tests" are to be taken with a mountain of salt. > > In case you didn't read the Ask Riot post I linked you, here's a section explaining _literally that_ as one of the reasons that they _don't_ use Prisoner's Island ideas: > > So, tell me then; if even _Riot_ says that they don't use Prisoner's Island systems, does that make _them_ liars, too? Most of your rebuttals stem off because Riot stated this, but you tend to forget Riot stated they'd let kayn be viable top lane when nerfing him and they didn't. Maybe you believe too much of what Riot says and not of the evidence in front of you. Now is there or isnt there prisoner island idk and honestly i dont really care but putting blind faith in Riot's words which theyve shown when pushed they will lie doesnt really say much in terms of a rebuttal since where he's biased against Riot you're bias for Riot.
> [{quoted}](name=Light Burner,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PPjRnnyd,comment-id=0002000000000001,timestamp=2019-04-22T21:59:35.325+0000) > > Most of your rebuttals stem off because Riot stated this, but you tend to forget Riot stated they'd let kayn be viable top lane when nerfing him and they didn't. Maybe you believe too much of what Riot says and not of the evidence in front of you. Now is there or isnt there prisoner island idk and honestly i dont really care but putting blind faith in Riot's words which theyve shown when pushed they will lie doesnt really say much in terms of a rebuttal since where he's biased against Riot you're bias for Riot. Your counter example is the viability of a character in a certain lane?........ One is a statement on how a computer program is set up, the other is a prediction of future meta. That's like saying you don't believe a hockey goal was scored because the announcers said there would be a line change and there wasnt.
: More strict player reforms, and reparations to victims of bad player behaviour
Aye, if this was implemented and I was in a game I thought was lost I would just spam missing ping people until someone snapped.
: > [{quoted}](name=SupportPlank,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PPjRnnyd,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-04-22T17:55:37.637+0000) > > I think he is on to something, when I go to 7-11 I end up running around smacking people AND GUESS WHAT?!?!??! > Everytime I go to 7-11 there is always some asshat running around hitting people. ironically calling someone crazy while talking nonsense
> [{quoted}](name=WarmAndCrispy,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PPjRnnyd,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-04-22T19:10:37.099+0000) > > ironically calling someone crazy while talking nonsense ... I also didn't say you were crazy, trolling maybe, but crazy no.
: > [{quoted}](name=SupportPlank,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PPjRnnyd,comment-id=0002000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-22T17:59:10.491+0000) > > To have a discussion you would have to prove your original thesis, which you haven't. Anicdotal evidence doesn't qualify as evidence. > > There's no work to be done because you have proven nothing, other then games you are involved in seem to have increased toxicity. The only non variable in that experiment would be you. oh, and what have you proven?
> [{quoted}](name=WarmAndCrispy,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PPjRnnyd,comment-id=00020000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-22T19:12:21.570+0000) > > oh, and what have you proven? ... I didn't start a thread making a claim that goes against what has been said by the very people that developed the system. You have to prove that Riot is lying and anicdotal evidence doesn't prove anything. Probability wise, it is highly more likely that a person punished for toxicity is continuing to be toxic i.e. causation vs correlation
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=WarmAndCrispy,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PPjRnnyd,comment-id=000200000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-22T14:57:47.379+0000) > > Yes I would have. Don't fucking tell me what I do and don't care about. Your "specialist" tag doesn't give you the right to assume peoples motivations and subsequent reactions. it's only a non-discussion because you don't have any legitimate counter points aside from "no you're wrong because me and riot say so". > > You haven't once explained WHY what I'm saying isn't true, just that it isn't. That's not a fucking discussion, thats just you sitting on your high horse,telling me im wrong and continuously flaming me for asking a question while assuming my intentions. > > I get it though, its easier for you to say that to avoid having to do any actual work in legitimately countering what I'm seeing with my own eyes. Instead you continue to dance around the question. To have a discussion you would have to prove your original thesis, which you haven't. Anicdotal evidence doesn't qualify as evidence. There's no work to be done because you have proven nothing, other then games you are involved in seem to have increased toxicity. The only non variable in that experiment would be you.
: Toxicity Jail is real
I think he is on to something, when I go to 7-11 I end up running around smacking people AND GUESS WHAT?!?!??! Everytime I go to 7-11 there is always some asshat running around hitting people.
: Did you get your account back? Yes I got the 14-day ban but I didn't notice that the next punishment would be a perma ban. I know back when the game first started 1 or 2-month bans were a thing so I assumed that would be next. Otherwise, I straight up would've left the account alone until next season so I wouldn't risk losing it
> [{quoted}](name=A sexy Zombie,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=3HEm52LR,comment-id=0006000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-21T19:53:12.363+0000) > > Did you get your account back? Yes I got the 14-day ban but I didn't notice that the next punishment would be a perma ban. I know back when the game first started 1 and 2-month bans were a thing so I assumed that would be next. Otherwise, I straight up would've left the account alone until next season so I wouldn't risk losing it Aye, yes they by mistake escalated me from 25 game to perm with no 14 day ban. So they gave me mu account back but with a 14 day ban on it. Way back in the day they use to have basically infinite chat restrictions, but they got rid of those awhile ago.
: I already answered you in that regard bud. You should read before you talk and our conversations won't be so cyclical. You are trying to act pious and infallible. You are just trying to start a fight with me and its quite obvious. I hope your easter is happy man; you seem like your projecting onto me. I'll genuinely pray for you =)
> [{quoted}](name=A sexy Zombie,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=3HEm52LR,comment-id=000500000000000000010000,timestamp=2019-04-21T19:48:14.049+0000) > > I already answered you in that regard bud. You should read before you talk and our conversations won't be so cyclical. You are trying to act pious and infallible. You are just trying to start a fight with me and its quite obvious. I hope your easter is happy man; you seem like your projecting onto me. I'll genuinely pray for you =) Pious and infallible? My post history.... does it carry over with name changes (?) Is full of my 10, 25 and 14 day punishments. I looked over the entire thread, you mention no where how long it has been since your 14. You post you don't know how to get old chat logs, you mention nothing of the newest ones which are most relevant. I appreciate the prayers, every little bit helps.
: I've played for ten years and the restrictions used to be different. That's why I asked the specialists if the standards to reporting have changed? you okay??? Do you need a hug????
> [{quoted}](name=A sexy Zombie,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=3HEm52LR,comment-id=00060000,timestamp=2019-04-21T18:56:33.065+0000) > > I've played for ten years and the restrictions used to be different. That's why I asked the specialists if the standards to reporting have changed? you okay??? Do you need a hug???? I've been playing awhile as well, and was very active on the tribunal. I'm fine, in fact having a very good day. I'm still not sure how you are confused on how it use to be vs how it is now. In your 14 day ban chat logs that you got it clearly states at the bottom of it that if you continued it would be a perm. That was probably when you should have asked questions. Sorry to say, but in terms of this account, it is gone. UNLESS you never got a 14 day ban and only got a 25 chat and then perm (which happened to me). In that case you open a support ticket and ask why your punishment was escalated.
: Woah yall are extremely toxic. I was going to ask you how I can recover all except the latest chat log, but it seems you are just looking to be an internet sjw intent of proving me wrong instead of observing the situation
> [{quoted}](name=A sexy Zombie,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=3HEm52LR,comment-id=0005000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-21T18:53:59.886+0000) > > Woah yall are extremely toxic. I was going to ask you how I can recover all except the latest chat log, but it seems you are just looking to be an internet sjw intent of proving me wrong instead of observing the situation You still haven't answered how long it had been since your 14 day ban. You also haven't posted your most recent chat logs which should appear when you attempt to log on. I'm a SJW for stating that you should have taken a warning seriously? I'm not sure you know what that means.
: I dont save them so I dont have them
> [{quoted}](name=A sexy Zombie,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=3HEm52LR,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2019-04-21T18:40:16.010+0000) > > I dont save them so I dont have them When you log in the logs are there. You don't recall when you received your 14 day ban? Maybe you should have taken that a bit more serious and you wouldn't be here moaning.
: I have had my account since Beta and now it is perma banned. I spent $500 on this account. Riot.....
Number of reports don't matter. One report triggers the IFS. "Defending" oneself with toxicity is still toxicity. You don't get notification every time your report triggers a punishment. Getting a notification is the exception not the rule. Honestly, there's not much about the punishment system that you seem to understand correctly.
: I have had my account since Beta and now it is perma banned. I spent $500 on this account. Riot.....
When you got your 14 day ban it said that if you kept this crap up you would be banned.... you kept it up and you got banned. How long has it been since your 14 day? Where are the chat logs?
robe166 (NA)
: Is it reportable?
Yes, it is reportable as everything is reportable. Punishable, probably not, but could be. If you actually farm efficiently, keep the pressure up, and cover objectives (i.e. keep a watch on baron and rift) you should be fine. However, if game after game you just push out top then afk at tower until the wave pushes out, and pay no attention to objectives you might be punished after many games and reports. Overall, unless you are purposely not trying to win, I don't think you'll be punished.
Vo1d1 (NA)
: it's justified when that person is intentionally ruining your game, but sure Riot, I'll just mute all every single game so I have no communication with anyone to make sure no one gets hurt feelings
> [{quoted}](name=Vo1d1,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=9Ablc2rc,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-04-18T17:17:14.277+0000) > > it's justified when that person is intentionally ruining your game, but sure Riot, I'll just mute all every single game so I have no communication with anyone to make sure no one gets hurt feelings You want to show me in the TOS where it states toxicity is fine in any circumstances? You could not type, if you can't control yourself, or you could type with out being an asshat. Either one is sufficient to avoid punishment.
: > [{quoted}](name=Vo1d1,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=9Ablc2rc,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-04-18T17:11:13.413+0000) > > I didn't racially abuse someone, I didn't go out of my way to verbally abuse anyone heavily, I didn't intentionally feed, I didn't bot the account, I didn't soft int, but I guess I hurt people with a few mildly aggressive sentences hard to say anything nowadays. even get banned for giving compliments or tips to get better at the game, since everyone is so soft.
> [{quoted}](name=Emperor Mudkip,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=9Ablc2rc,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-04-18T17:13:04.328+0000) > > hard to say anything nowadays. even get banned for giving compliments or tips to get better at the game, since everyone is so soft. Citation?
905 (EUNE)
: Hi, just have one simple question to a Rioter
Lol, someone was trolling my game so I gave them attention.... makes sense.
: This banning system is actually a joke?
Each game you picked a person that lost it for you and spent the majority of the chat and post game chat going off about them. How in the hell is that deflecting toxicity? I think you meant reflecting.
: Perma Banned because of this LMAO
As much as I normally agree with the logs showing toxicity, this one is pretty damn minor. I can only reckon that you JUST came off a 14 day ban, and if so the system is super sensitive.
: > [{quoted}](name=SupportPlank,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=3k5M9REp,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-04-13T15:57:42.583+0000) > > Probably because this is about the 500th thread on banning my hover. > It's a part of the game. It's the equivalent of creating a thread because, yet again, you saw a cloud in the sky. I saw 3 small pidgens today. One WAIT get this... It WAS A BIRD.
> [{quoted}](name=Negativity ll,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=3k5M9REp,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-04-13T19:14:12.521+0000) > > I saw 3 small pidgens today. One WAIT get this... It WAS A BIRD. Frankly I am more interested in your pigeon thread then another hover ban one.
: Ban System
Aye, if people did report and threaten to report half the team as inting due to a failed gank the system might be better equipped to find actual inters.
: gotta love when people ban your hover..
Probably because this is about the 500th thread on banning my hover. It's a part of the game. It's the equivalent of creating a thread because, yet again, you saw a cloud in the sky.
Show more

SupportPlank

Level 216 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion