: Soraka should take some notes from Malfurion
I find this idea interesting at the very least. I love Soraka as a character but I am open to some gameplay changes.
saltran (EUW)
: Agree, Soraka is hot.
LankPants (OCE)
: >Group A - Just wants to play League doesn't care about the pro scene Group B - Enjoys League, tunes in occasionally to watch the pro scene (usually for big things like playoff finals, MSI, Worlds) Group C - Enjoys League, watches LCS religiously (every weekend they make time to watch every game or atleast the games with their favorite teams. Group D - Used to play League, doesn't anymore, but still watches the LCS because they like the pro scene Group E - Never played League before, but I friend told them it was pretty cool and got them to watch a few games Something to consider here is the relative size of these groups. Group A is by far the largest, then B, then C the D and E. Weighting them equally would be pretty dumb.
Do you have proof of this statement?
CLG ear (NA)
: cutie
> [{quoted}](name=CLG ear,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=EJPMyJx8,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-04-08T20:01:57.832+0000) > > cutie The cutest.
: > People are sick of nearly EVERY humanoid female Character being oversexualised! {{champion:103}} : Being sexy is part of her story as well as significant in her character inspiration. {{champion:84}} : The side cut dress is strong with this one, but she's also getting a full vgu so I can't really say anything {{champion:34}} : LOL {{champion:1}} : **police sirens** {{champion:22}} : Not hypersexualized {{champion:51}} : The most sexy thing about this champion is the "good cop bad cop" quote and that's literally it {{champion:164}} : Not hypersexualized {{champion:69}} : I mean if you're into that sort of thing, also significant in her character inspiration (gorgons tricked men only to turn them to stone) {{champion:131}} : Not sexualized in the slightest {{champion:60}} : Again, if you're into that sort of thing I could definitely see this one, I can't make the story argument here though, most mythological spider ladies are weavers, not deceivers {{champion:28}} : I hope I don't have to explain why she **should** be hypersexualized. LITERAL SUCCUBUS {{champion:114}} : Not sexualized {{champion:420}} : Not sexualized {{champion:39}} : Not sexualized {{champion:40}} : I could kinda see this one due to her clothing, so that's one, maybe two so far (if you're into spider ladies) That are **needlessly sexualized** {{champion:222}} : I mean her clothing is as bad as Janna's but the personality is so strong that a majority of people don't think sexy and instead flock to insane. {{champion:145}} : Sexualized, that's three {{champion:429}} : Not into necrophilia, also the same as Jinx but with revenge {{champion:43}} : Not sexualized {{champion:55}} : I guess I'll count this one since personality doesn't shine through, so four {{champion:10}} : Nope {{champion:203}} : half of a LOL {{champion:7}} : Not sure if I should or shouldn't, it's implied she uses her looks to trick people too, but I don't believe it's explicitly stated.... I'll count it for the benefit of the doubt, so five {{champion:89}} : Nope {{champion:127}} : Nope {{champion:117}} : **Police sirens** {{champion:99}} : No {{champion:21}} : Ok this is an easy one, six. I guess you could argue it, but even if you could it's a little much {{champion:25}} : I mean I've never thought of her as sexy, but I guess I could see why others would, so seven {{champion:267}} : If you're into it? but mermaid trope, they're all kinda less clothed so I can't count it {{champion:76}} : Wild man/wild woman trope, If I counted her I'd have to count someone like Tarzan too, which is fair, eight {{champion:61}} : No {{champion:78}} : **Poli**- wait, she's as old as Demacia the nation..... still not counting it {{champion:133}} : Not sexualized {{champion:421}} : God **DAMN** she's too sexy guys I'mma have to count it to infinity now {{champion:92}} : not sexualized {{champion:113}} : Not sexualized {{champion:102}} : Eh, I don't think I can count it, again personality doesn't shine too much, but also just enough for her not to be defined as "sexy" so much as serious. {{champion:15}} : Infinity plus nine {{champion:37}} : Infinity plus ten, she's well clothed, but she's a sexual icon for league {{champion:16}} : NOPE. {{champion:134}} : I mean... the b'oob window, but it's also small, and her personality actually is pretty clear in game... this one's pretty on the fence for me..... I'mma say no {{champion:163}} : Nope {{champion:18}} : Ah, the sirens are back {{champion:67}} : Not sexualized {{champion:254}} : are sexy and sexualized the same thing? Like I think Vi's sexy, but she's not really sexualized, fully clothed, no innuendo's, I can't count it as sexualized {{champion:498}} : I mean, I guess if you're {{champion:497}} but for the human race I'mma say no {{champion:142}} : **DON'T LET HER APPEARANCE FOOL YOU, ZOE IS AN IMMORTAL BEING-** But seriously no {{champion:143}} : I guess since she has no mythology I know of I'll count her as infinity plus 11 So 11/50? 49? (lost count). I mean if you don't include Rek'sai. She's so beautiful counting her would give you an unfair edge.
> [{quoted}](name=jocomotion,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=E3yLIk4T,comment-id=00000019,timestamp=2018-04-08T16:10:36.840+0000) > > {{champion:103}} : Being sexy is part of her story as well as significant in her character inspiration. > {{champion:84}} : The side cut dress is strong with this one, but she's also getting a full vgu so I can't really say anything > {{champion:34}} : LOL > {{champion:1}} : **police sirens** > {{champion:22}} : Not hypersexualized > {{champion:51}} : The most sexy thing about this champion is the "good cop bad cop" quote and that's literally it > {{champion:164}} : Not hypersexualized > {{champion:69}} : I mean if you're into that sort of thing, also significant in her character inspiration (gorgons tricked men only to turn them to stone) > {{champion:131}} : Not sexualized in the slightest > {{champion:60}} : Again, if you're into that sort of thing I could definitely see this one, I can't make the story argument here though, most mythological spider ladies are weavers, not deceivers > {{champion:28}} : I hope I don't have to explain why she **should** be hypersexualized. LITERAL SUCCUBUS > {{champion:114}} : Not sexualized > {{champion:420}} : Not sexualized > {{champion:39}} : Not sexualized > {{champion:40}} : I could kinda see this one due to her clothing, so that's one, maybe two so far (if you're into spider ladies) That are **needlessly sexualized** > {{champion:222}} : I mean her clothing is as bad as Janna's but the personality is so strong that a majority of people don't think sexy and instead flock to insane. > {{champion:145}} : Sexualized, that's three > {{champion:429}} : Not into necrophilia, also the same as Jinx but with revenge > {{champion:43}} : Not sexualized > {{champion:55}} : I guess I'll count this one since personality doesn't shine through, so four > {{champion:10}} : Nope > {{champion:203}} : half of a LOL > {{champion:7}} : Not sure if I should or shouldn't, it's implied she uses her looks to trick people too, but I don't believe it's explicitly stated.... I'll count it for the benefit of the doubt, so five > {{champion:89}} : Nope > {{champion:127}} : Nope > {{champion:117}} : **Police sirens** > {{champion:99}} : No > {{champion:21}} : Ok this is an easy one, six. I guess you could argue it, but even if you could it's a little much > {{champion:25}} : I mean I've never thought of her as sexy, but I guess I could see why others would, so seven > {{champion:267}} : If you're into it? but mermaid trope, they're all kinda less clothed so I can't count it > {{champion:76}} : Wild man/wild woman trope, If I counted her I'd have to count someone like Tarzan too, which is fair, eight > {{champion:61}} : No > {{champion:78}} : **Poli**- wait, she's as old as Demacia the nation..... still not counting it > {{champion:133}} : Not sexualized > {{champion:421}} : God **DAMN** she's too sexy guys I'mma have to count it to infinity now > {{champion:92}} : not sexualized > {{champion:113}} : Not sexualized > {{champion:102}} : Eh, I don't think I can count it, again personality doesn't shine too much, but also just enough for her not to be defined as "sexy" so much as serious. > {{champion:15}} : Infinity plus nine > {{champion:37}} : Infinity plus ten, she's well clothed, but she's a sexual icon for league > {{champion:16}} : NOPE. > {{champion:134}} : I mean... the b'oob window, but it's also small, and her personality actually is pretty clear in game... this one's pretty on the fence for me..... I'mma say no > {{champion:163}} : Nope > {{champion:18}} : Ah, the sirens are back > {{champion:67}} : Not sexualized > {{champion:254}} : are sexy and sexualized the same thing? Like I think Vi's sexy, but she's not really sexualized, fully clothed, no innuendo's, I can't count it as sexualized > {{champion:498}} : I mean, I guess if you're {{champion:497}} but for the human race I'mma say no > {{champion:142}} : **DON'T LET HER APPEARANCE FOOL YOU, ZOE IS AN IMMORTAL BEING-** But seriously no > {{champion:143}} : I guess since she has no mythology I know of I'll count her as infinity plus 11 > > So 11/50? 49? (lost count). I mean if you don't include Rek'sai. She's so beautiful counting her would give you an unfair edge. Now hold on. Don't sell Soraka short. Anyway. You are correct that sexy is different than sexualized. Note that different people find different things attractive anyway but that doesn't mean they are sexualized. For example I find Soraka attractive (don't ask) but not sexualized.
: I played against @Laughing Fish in normals
Ayyy I remember this game. wp on those baron steals. I'm personally happy about that game because as it turns out I'm not as rusty on Azir as I thought I was. Shame we lost tho.
: Azir & Nunu botlane
I've thought of doing it, never got around to it however
: MORE AZIR NERFS! Secondary stab damage lowered from 40/70/100% at 1/6/11 to 20/40/60% at 1/6/11 YEEESS!
Ooof, this means that Azir would never deal full damage to anyone but his primary target. I mean, I *suppose* it's more fair but as somebody who played him a ton it's gonna suck.
: You mean a retarded one? Zoe has a joke for HP. If she ults towards you for anything but a finisher, she's dead.
: > [{quoted}](name=TyrekGoldenspear,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Vvt6Ea6f,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-01-31T15:23:53.272+0000)Get me a buff for Soraka pls, my waifu is having a hard laifu with these kill lanes. Done. Soraka gains 20/40/60/80/100 bonus armor and magic resistance while a heal is active on an allied champion. > Also, can you get Azir's knockup back? Nah, sorry. That one ran away and was adopted by a family in the next town. It would be cruel to take it away from them after they've treated it so well and fallen so in love with it.
> [{quoted}](name=The Djinn,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Vvt6Ea6f,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2018-01-31T15:30:40.589+0000) > > Done. Soraka gains 20/40/60/80/100 bonus armor and magic resistance while a heal is active on an allied champion. > > Nah, sorry. That one ran away and was adopted by a family in the next town. It would be cruel to take it away from them after they've treated it so well and fallen so in love with it. Well, 1 out of 2 isn't bad. Thanks Djinn! The volunteer balance team is the best! Gonna go ranked with Aftershock Soraka and laugh in their puny faces!
: My idea to tone down Zoe (Shift Power)
This idea has merit; on another note I feel that the reason she has so much damage on Q is because that is literally her only damage spell besides her passive. So they have to load a burst mage's combo damage into one spell. So naturally it feels bad to get smacked by it. A weakness that burst mages usually have however is that they can't burst tanks. However Zoe's true damage amp on her sleep makes her able to do a heft amount of damage to both. Perhaps tone down the true damage to let the beefier guys tank the shots?
: Things I learned today: volunteer moderators have the power to dictate champion buffs. I can't believe I was never informed of this! {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}} Quick, who wants buffs for their mains? Let me know, before Riot fixes this obvious flaw in the balance process!
> [{quoted}](name=The Djinn,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Vvt6Ea6f,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-01-31T15:21:15.929+0000) > > Things I learned today: volunteer moderators have the power to dictate champion buffs. I can't believe I was never informed of this! > > {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}} > > Quick, who wants buffs for their mains? Get me a buff for Soraka pls, my waifu is having a hard laifu with these kill lanes. Also, can you get Azir's knockup back? Thanks {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
CLG ear (NA)
: This is what I hate the most about Disney Star Wars franchise
> The Last Jedi was a disaster, but I still saw it. I liked the film, personally. There were flaws, but remember that EVERY film has flaws, even the original trilogy, which many star wars fans seem to forget. For me the ups outweighed the lows.
: > [{quoted}](name=SEKAI,realm=OCE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=rXi2bN3W,comment-id=0001000100000000,timestamp=2018-01-25T22:49:08.188+0000) > > It's not like people only sing the praises of the prequels because obvious there were also a few other bigger issues people had with the movie, but they clearly didn't hate them for more than a fraction of how much we do today. I'm going to assume that you're fairly young, as in 20ish or less. Because you clearly do not know how much Star Wars fans DESPISED the prequels, and also, which is why they hate the sequels. Back then, Lucasarts officially sanctioned an entire expanded universe that grew out in the form of books and video games. There was rich backstory for everyone, and the world as a whole, as well as an even richer world that followed the original trilogy. Lucasarts developed this world for YEARS, and characters like Mara Jade made it into video games and other content. Then Lucas made the prequels. He surreptitiously shat on everything that his officially sanctioned universe had developed. He fucked up back stories, he fucked up planets, and he fucked up the origins of the Empire. And then he added Jar Jar, and claimed the Force was actually magic bacteria, and it just left everything completely sour for everyone. Likewise, that is why people HATE the sequels too. Aside from keeping Han and Leia together, they fucked up an even richer line of stories (Jaina and Jacen Solo), the Thrawn trilogy, and completely removed THE most popular expanded universe characters Mara Jade, who eventually became Mara Jade Skywalker. Rather than do what DC comics did when they first introduced Harley Quinn in the Animated Series and she exploded in popularity, Disney decided to completely ignore Mara Jade, and instead went off on a new path. So don't get me wrong, I'm bitter about the sequels too, but they at least feel like Star Wars movies, even sub par ones. The prequels do not. They are way too heavily reliant on CG landscapes and speeder bike chases, and their overall characterization just sucks a throbbing dick.
> [{quoted}](name=Oleandervine,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=rXi2bN3W,comment-id=00010001000000000000,timestamp=2018-01-25T23:02:49.925+0000) > >and claimed the Force was actually magic bacteria, and it just left everything completely sour for everyone. If you think that was what midichlorians represented, then you did not pay attention to the film at all. > Likewise, that is why people HATE the sequels too. Don't speak for everyone. People have different tastes, and I acknowledge that the prequels are flawed BUT I appreciate what Lucas was trying to do. Note that for the prequels he was making a backstory for an established story unlike with the original trilogy, with which he was making a story from scratch and didn't have limitations so to speak.
Wuks (NA)
: For YOUR eyes only owo
: 2018 Ranked Placements Venting post!
Starting my placements tomorrow. Hoy boy, just posting here to get prepared. Gonna update my post with results of my placements and anything noteworthy for the lols. Game 1: Got fed, lost cuz jungler dived too hard. Game 2: A win Game 3: Win Game 4: team got tilted but we still won Game 5: enemy Nasus got super fed, and murdered us. We pulled ahead with superior tactics, but a slip up lategame caused the loss. Game 6: Roamed well and helped our Jax lane, he carried us late. Won. Game 7: Had to leave because emergency, 4 mins later team won without me, still counts as a win for me.
: Probably just because it's funny to have a big tubby guy be part of an arctic ops team.
Either that or Gragas is supposed to be the heavy weapon support or the vehicle drop off guy on the ops team.
Rexxiee (NA)
: Riot supports do NOT need another 800g buff
You forgot the fact that these items were already nerfed. It's not like they reverted the buffs on these items and then removed sightstone. Also, supports seem strong because adcs are used to beating everything early game.
Xonra (NA)
: And to be completely fair, this play is nothing but no to low context rehashes of jokes mocking everyone else. See how we aren't that different from what the other thinks? This place thinks Gameplay just repeats complaints and does nothing but complain. Every other board thinks this place is just the same 4 jokes in a slightly different format with different (sometimes) gifs attached. The difference is we aren't throwing crap over the fence at you while trying to pretend we have the high ground.
There are other things, but you just focus on the jokes that mock other people. Unlike Gameplay, there is variety on M&G if you look. Also most of the other boards makes fun of Gameplay. The RP board does for example.
: how big a step is in league [explained]
: Every cancer mage has the exact same niche
Well, Mages usually supply utility.
Galacius (NA)
: Regarding Recent "Fire GhostCrawler" or "Fire the Balance Team" Threads
I feel most of this frustration because Riot's going in a direction people don't want it to go in. I know people nostalgic for seasons past want the game to stay there, and when the game moves past that, and it likely won't feel the same, people will be upset about it. Personally I have more or less adapted to the preseason, mainly grabbing utility. A Yasuo is good, but a Lux that can catch people out and get them blown up is more useful. A Leo that can lock people down and waste the enemy's burst AND can do respectable damage to squishies is even more useful. Now for the people who like to play Yasuo this sucks, and I feel. However I feel that Riot's in a transition point, and the only direction to go is forwards, not backwards to yesterday's issues.
Xonra (NA)
: How many meme threads are you gonna make about how much you hate Gameplay? - Make comments about how negative Gameplay is - Spends the next few days making meme thread after meme thread mocking Gameplay. Then again, same guy talking about removing low content threads, and this is at least the second time I've seen you posting this picture with different text just this week.
To be completely fair, making fun of Gameplay isn't hard. It's literally a cesspool where the most salty and most rage infused people post, leaving logic and reason to the wind. There are gems in the muck, but that doesn't make the place not muck.
: are they picked for there tankyness or there damage? ornn tho a complete bullshit champion to lane against isnt as much of a problem compared to the likes or rammus or vayne
Tank are picked for a little of both, because they can: A: shrug off the burst damage the other team carries, B: They can hold down key people for your burst champs to explode. C: Their respectable base damage is murder to Squishies.
CLG ear (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=TyrekGoldenspear,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=78OX72Eu,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-01-01T18:49:29.889+0000) > > \#SpoilerWarning > > With that out of the way, what caused this post to come about, it is these seemingly random posts on GD that have me genuinely intrigued. the movie was released in 2010 and it's bad so spoilers don't matter not like there are any in the op
> [{quoted}](name=CLG ear,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=78OX72Eu,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-01-01T18:51:41.799+0000) > > the movie was released in 2010 and it's bad so spoilers don't matter not like there are any in the op The Spoiler warning was just a joke fam, but I assume you watched it or something then got the idea to post on it?
CLG ear (NA)
: I watched Legion (the movie not the tv show) and it was really bad
\#SpoilerWarning With that out of the way, what caused this post to come about, it is these seemingly random posts on GD that have me genuinely intrigued.
: If you want to nerf tanks you first have to nerf damage throughout the game, MAINLY the ADCs damage.
Everyone's damage is a bit high ngl.
: Good Riddance 2017
Idk, lots of good things have happened this year, it's just that negativity bias make it easy to remember the bad stuff, and harder to remember the good.
Sarkhis (NA)
: I got matched with 4 people that i had blocked...
: Grading the balance team on their Final Trial: This Preseason
So, did the Gaming Forum Department of Design approve the grading system you used? Idk, this seems arbitrary. Not saying this season doesn't have issues, but you're showing it in all the wrong ways.
ShiniXII (EUW)
: make leona's stuns longer please
At least she has to use her whole kit unlike some other champs.
Hashihime (EUW)
: Do you remember when Vayne used to take skill?
Ngl she was more annoying when her Q bonus damage could crit.
: fps issues tied to mouse movement????
I've noticed fps issues as well ingame, even with my ping at ~30
: > [{quoted}](name=DerJabberwocky,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=6c2t5YAY,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2017-11-30T18:19:12.216+0000) > > Implying anyone actually cared about the lore before today. > I see nothing in his voice quotes in game that can't be justified under the new lore that was justified under the old. > Y'all are just whining to whine. This was not a change that was in any way necessary. This was a change solely for the sake of being a change. Such changes are often short sighted and terrible. I actually consider this change to be pandering and it only tells me how much more shitty Riot has become.
> [{quoted}](name=Busty Demoness,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=6c2t5YAY,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2017-11-30T18:26:47.696+0000) > > This was not a change that was in any way necessary. > > This was a change solely for the sake of being a change. Such changes are often short sighted and terrible. I actually consider this change to be pandering and it only tells me how much more shitty Riot has become. Not only that... But now Riot has made more work for themselves. Now they have to update his VO (and you know Riot stays on top of VO updates) whereas if they simply fleshed out the old lore, they would be done.
: Varus' new lore: The Good, the Bad, and What Could've Been
Too messy, like you said. It feels like it's a step up from Kayn in terms of the Darkin Human power dynamic. Instead of 1 v 1, it's 1 v 2! Feels uninspired.
: What evidence to you have to suggest a shoe-horned agenda that is any more egregious that Riot's initiative to delete old lore and replace it with weaker versions of itself? Would it somehow be better if Varus were a straight couple trapped inside?
No. I don't care how many people are trapped in Varus. That isn't the point here. This was a story of Vengeance, and how Varus decided to go down a dark path in the name of vengeance. This was *HIS* choice, and *HIS* tragedy. Not some random people who get trapped in him and how *it's basically Kayn plus 1* Varus fought the corruption. Varus walked down a dark path and tried his hardest to keep the darkness from consuming him completely. That is Varus. What we got is not Varus. It is a completely different champion, with different motives, characteristics, etc.
: The naming convention was literally just based on 2 previous cases. That's like saying there has to be a T in every Darkin name because the last two had it.
Rito established that it's a trait of the Darkin to have those kinds of names. Now that's up in smoke.
iLBGAMing (EUW)
: It appears that i'm the only person that doesn't hate the new Varus lore (coming from a Varus Main)
Well, you're comparing Varus's old lore to his new lore, which is more fleshed out and obviously it will be of higher quality. A more accurate comparison would be this new lore compared to a lore that stays faithful to Varus's OG lore *but* is fleshed out to the level of this one.
: ***
Or maybe you're letting the fact that they are gay blind you to the fact that they are poorly written and a shoehorned in agenda that has the added side effect of ruining Varus's drive, and motives. His VO doesn't even make sense anymore. Why go through all that extra VO work when you can just flesh out his old lore? It was fine.
: Varus being CHANGED to Gay feels wrong for his character
Yeah, I don't know why Riot went this direction tbh. They literally made a bunch more work for themselves AND created more inconsistencies (Why is Varus the Darkin? He doesn't have the same naming convention, as just one example.) I agree with you completely. A simple modernization would have been much better imo, and wouldn't destroy his character.
: Elementalist Lux Splash Art Easter Egg
: > [{quoted}](name=GripaAviara,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=kH6xGXTU,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2017-11-28T11:42:31.883+0000) > > It's not the same. To deal damage nunu needs to get in low range. Also he doesn't have the damage lux has The point is not that it is the same. The point is this sort of post is so common and is so bad that is a borderline joke. Anybody can make a list of only the good parts of a kit, ignoring the negatives to hysterically cry that a champion is OP, for any champion (and they have), to make an argument that has no bearing on the reality of the game in order to make them look OP. Even for someone called the worst champion in the game. But you are right about one thing, "he doesn't have the damage lux has". He has more with higher AP scaling.
This. You are my hero, assumed Sona main.
Kameil (NA)
: The Ask Champion Compendium
I claim interest in Twisted Fate.
: Which Champion Do you Find The Most Attractive?
{{champion:16}} all the way. Her personality is just perfect for me, and she's a hottie too. SG or otherwise.
wildfox99 (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=TyrekGoldenspear,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=kwERnyRu,comment-id=0001000000000000000000010000,timestamp=2017-11-26T19:40:32.101+0000) > > My main thing is that Ahri can nearly kill somebody, and OP will still say it's "no damage." it's not what you expect from a full AP champion which is that squishy,malphite can get half squishy health bar with 1 combo but he's a tank who build full tank and that have 200+ armor 4000+hp,there is nothing wrong if HE can't kill a squishy,he's not building damage but defensive stats if i build full damage it means i expect OS people if i hit everything,like other mages do,but actually orianna easily outdamage her (utility champ with lower CD and more CC,sure),that's his point so,what if ezreal Q would deal 1 damage? it's still damage you are poking him,1 hp is still something doesn't it? ofc it wouldn't be what do you expect from a caster ADC,it's the same
> [{quoted}](name=wildfox99,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=kwERnyRu,comment-id=00010000000000000000000100000000,timestamp=2017-11-26T20:16:40.605+0000) > > it's not what you expect from a full AP champion which is that squishy,malphite can get half squishy health bar with 1 combo but he's a tank who build full tank and that have 200+ armor 4000+hp,there is nothing wrong if HE can't kill a squishy,he's not building damage but defensive stats > > if i build full damage it means i expect OS people if i hit everything,like other mages do,but actually orianna easily outdamage her (utility champ with lower CD and more CC,sure),that's his point > > so,what if ezreal Q would deal 1 damage? > it's still damage you are poking him,1 hp is still something doesn't it? > ofc it wouldn't be what do you expect from a caster ADC,it's the same I feel you are misunderstanding my point. But more on topic. OP says that Ahri W does no damage. Well for a reliable spell it shouldn't burst on its own. I made a mistake with my initial reply and misread it as her kit does no damage when we are talking about her W alone.
Akróma (EUW)
: My Zoe FanArt
Wow! looks great!
Sraeg2013 (EUNE)
: That line links to a specific thread detailing what's the subject of it. If it means "literally anything a mod wants" then it's bullshit not a "rule". http://gif-finder.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Stalin-Clap.gif
Riot's board. Their rules. How you feel about it has nothing to do with anything. You know what the difference is between Stalin's regime and this rule? If you lived in the Soviet Union, you were subject to the government's rules because you lived there and it controlled your life in most if not all aspects. Simply clicking away from these boards solves your problem with these rules. And it isn't anything they want, it's anything they find inappropriate.
Sraeg2013 (EUNE)
: Well then, please, tell me which part states those comments were against the rules. Because I can read and it's not there, so maybe you have a different set of rules that aren't available to public.
You're looking for a solid line of where the rules stand. The "Any content we find inappropriate will be dealt with accordingly" clause gives mods the right to delete questionable posts. The line is left blurry so that fringe cases can be dealt with case-by-case.
wildfox99 (EUW)
: > What you want is the ability to oneshot in one rotation. true,it's almost like you are building full damage / glasscannon,damn 3/4 is too much,just nerf it yea,a mage should be able to kill someone only with 2 rotation (~4/5 sec),when an ADC must kill you in 3 autos with 2.5 AS (~1.5 sec) >Just fyi, doing as little as 2/3rds of their hp bar is still doing damage. so i can play janna mid full tank? i still do damage,it's like 150~200 in one rotation but it's still damage,it's ok ---- sure this guy is shitposting,but you as answer only shittalk
> [{quoted}](name=wildfox99,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=kwERnyRu,comment-id=000100000000000000000001,timestamp=2017-11-26T19:16:33.003+0000) > > true,it's almost like you are building full damage / glasscannon,damn 3/4 is too much,just nerf it > > yea,a mage should be able to kill someone only with 2 rotation (~4/5 sec),when an ADC must kill you in 3 autos with 2.5 AS (~1.5 sec) > > so i can play janna mid full tank? i still do damage,it's like 150~200 in one rotation but it's still damage,it's ok > > ---- > > sure this guy is shitposting,but you as answer only shittalk My main thing is that Ahri can nearly kill somebody, and OP will still say it's "no damage."
: Any mages vs Ad Assassins mid should be a skill match up lane not an itemization lane...
I feel hexdrinker's power can be shifted to Maw. However, note that if they have a hex, don't all in them. Poke them till the shield procs, wait for it to go away, then all in them.
Show more

TyrekGoldenspear

Level 72 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion