AmazoX (EUW)
: If NB3 goes unpunished then your rules mean nothing, it only means you play favorites.
Maybe drop the unlocked account at the **very least**. Didn't Tyler lose his over some mild toxicity issue?
: No we can't. Because it's hypocritical of the community to go after a streamer because they did exactly what every single player would have done which is report someone you think is trolling. And don't act like people would just not say anything if they thought someone was trolling. They would whine about it the whole game in all chat and beg for reports. I doubt anyone on the team was favorable of Teemo's actions so don't be sitting there acting like NB3 was the villain when 100 times out of 100 everyone here would have done the same thing or worse.
> [{quoted}](name=OneMustFall,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=EZq42Ejp,comment-id=0008,timestamp=2019-06-16T04:19:07.280+0000) > > they did exactly what every single player would have done which is report someone you think is trolling Speak for yourself. I won't AFK while I file a report. I play the game and then do the report after the game has concluded. Don't pretend you know how _"100 of 100" everyone would have done the same"_ because that's just flat out wrong.
Rioter Comments
: My issue with the whole scenario isn't that the teemo was punished. If he did a shitty thing he deserved it. But if he got punished because Night made a fuss then it's an issue. And furthermore, the rioter ignored Nights own trolling and rule breaking which is what bothers me the most.
> [{quoted}](name=Around999People,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=8nU0OswR,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-06-15T04:09:01.646+0000) > > My issue with the whole scenario isn't that the teemo was punished. If he did a shitty thing he deserved it. But if he got punished because Night made a fuss then it's an issue. > > And furthermore, the rioter ignored Nights own trolling and rule breaking which is what bothers me the most. This, pretty much! {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}}
Rioter Comments
: Nightblue gets a player Falsely banned.
I feel like both this Teeto and Nightblue kinda deserve each other {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: I would but their mission will not even works, you must watch like 20 vods but they will barely recognize you watched one at the best.
> [{quoted}](name=Garen is adopted,realm=EUNE,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=ibGAfEck,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-06-14T23:39:48.819+0000) > > I would but their mission will not even works, you must watch like 20 vods but they will barely recognize you watched one at the best. I haven't had any problems so far with the Watch page :)
Rioter Comments
pvpAZRA (NA)
: the game is so fucking slow outside of urf that most people tire of it quickly. i know because myself and 37 other friends only play when urf is on. We'd rather play PoE or basically anything else.
> [{quoted}](name=pvpAZRA,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=sZxizExP,comment-id=00080000,timestamp=2019-06-13T08:32:13.710+0000) > > the game is so fucking slow outside of urf that most people tire of it quickly. i know because myself and 37 other friends only play when urf is on. We'd rather play PoE or basically anything else. I mean, if you enjoy mashing buttons in a mindless way I suppose it's ok. Dynasty Warriors has made a franchise out of that. I don't get it.
: "We don't pick favorites for skins"
And we're fresh off new Ezreal/Lux skins. I'd bet a new Ahri skin will be coming before the end of the year.
Barso55 (NA)
: Lux has been too strong and too safe a pick for too long
Support Lux is the real problem. Mid Lux still has to farm and earn her Gold to buy items. She's easy to burst and lacks mobility. Support Lux gets free stuff from Support Items and hanging around her ADC, and since Riot's idea for Supports is that they should make a lot of free Gold by poking people a little sometimes or just hanging out in lane, Supp Lux gets to build as a Mid Mage with barely any of the costs that come as playing her in the Mid lane. I personally really dislike how much free gold Mage Supports get, and I think it has been a problem for years by this point, but I don't think Riot cares to do anything about that or how they'd even do it without making Enchanter and Tank supports also take less income via the items. All because Riot's only way to fulfill a Game play fantasy is to give you lots of gold to buy items ASAP in this Arms-Race meta they've invented.
: POLL: Should QSS remove ultimates like Mordekaiser?
Modre and Camille, no... Zed and Fiora, yes.
CytheGuy (NA)
: Because that's EXACTLY what I wanted to hear /s
Watch her kit be gutted for 5 patches in a row and still being 100% pick/ban at LCS level.
: The House Triumphant
We needed just one more week at the Council to get 1st
: Not weird in the slightest - that's the hidden 3rd meme. That bot lane always argues like an angry married couple and throws the game. :P
> [{quoted}](name=ChaosReyn,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=qwHGjHm5,comment-id=002000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-06-05T18:27:16.475+0000) > > Not weird in the slightest - that's the hidden 3rd meme. That bot lane always argues like an angry married couple and throws the game. :P That's by far the most accurate.
Rioter Comments
: That goes both ways too. In like seasons 2-5, the meme was reversed - that the supports were supposed to be spammy ward bots and the adc's personal butler/maid, but if the adc died, it was cause the support either - didn't ward - didn't peel - were overextended/hiding under tier 2 tower - didn't sacrifice themselves for the cause - didn't ping *another lane's mia* in time - cant fucking dodge - stealing (literally 3) cs (in a 37 minute game) - or any combination of the above. Now in like seasons 6-current, it's the other way around. Now the adcs are either - too far overextended/hiding under tower - deal less damage than scuttle - aren't focusing the right target (trick question - the right target is always the target they weren't hitting) - can't cs for shit - cant fucking dodge - have no map awareness (since at this point pings are also a meme) - or any combination of the above. Note: a lot of the times the complaints on both sides are actually somewhat accurate in most cases. But the issue comes in neither one ever being able to accept it. And as I said, it's to the point it really doesn't matter, since the resulting flame war means neither of them are going to be relevant. I say this about myself too - the adcs who hide under tower are my biggest pet peeve since it means we're generating zero lane pressure and losing exp to the freeze. So when I tilt from that and the adc starts flaming me back for "ruining his cs" that he literally refuses to contest, our lane is pretty much done. But on a positive note - if it can change that much once, it can do so again, so your rather fruitless wish for the supports to sit down may still come to fruition.
> [{quoted}](name=ChaosReyn,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=qwHGjHm5,comment-id=0020000000000000,timestamp=2019-06-05T01:47:17.071+0000) > > That goes both ways too. In like seasons 2-5, the meme was reversed - that the supports were supposed to be spammy ward bots and the adc's personal butler/maid, but if the adc died, it was cause the support either > > - didn't ward > - didn't peel > - were overextended/hiding under tier 2 tower > - didn't sacrifice themselves for the cause > - didn't ping *another lane's mia* in time > - cant fucking dodge > - stealing (literally 3) cs (in a 37 minute game) > - or any combination of the above. > > Now in like seasons 6-current, it's the other way around. Now the adcs are either > > - too far overextended/hiding under tower > - deal less damage than scuttle > - aren't focusing the right target (trick question - the right target is always the target they weren't hitting) > - can't cs for shit > - cant fucking dodge > - have no map awareness (since at this point pings are also a meme) > - or any combination of the above. > > Note: a lot of the times the complaints on both sides are actually somewhat accurate in most cases. But the issue comes in neither one ever being able to accept it. And as I said, it's to the point it really doesn't matter, since the resulting flame war means neither of them are going to be relevant. I say this about myself too - the adcs who hide under tower are my biggest pet peeve since it means we're generating zero lane pressure and losing exp to the freeze. So when I tilt from that and the adc starts flaming me back for "ruining his cs" that he literally refuses to contest, our lane is pretty much done. > > But on a positive note - if it can change that much once, it can do so again, so your rather fruitless wish for the supports to sit down may still come to fruition. I don't want it to be a world where the Supps get blamed for everything. This is gonna sound really weird but just in like a successful marriage or a really bad divorce, it's always a dance of two. I just want people to take responsibility for their mistakes. If I'm way too extended and die, that's my fault. If Pyke can't land a Q on a snared target, then walks up to them and dies, that's on him. I also put it in Tier 2 cause it's nowhere near as bad as my Tier 1 stuff.
: I'd argue ADCs are the same way. I play both sides of bot (primary support secondary adc) so pretty much it's just "that second laner in general" with me at this point. Whether you get a support who literally hides behind your tier 2 turret so they don't get hit and tells you to stop feeding, an adc who got one early kill and decided to try a 2v4 everyone was pinging from miles away, or you get one or the other that just *can not fucking dodge*, it's always the other person's fault. It can never have anything to do with one laner playing poorly, it *has* to be the other guy, and it always inevitably makes it so that both fail equally.
> [{quoted}](name=ChaosReyn,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=qwHGjHm5,comment-id=00200000,timestamp=2019-06-05T00:44:14.616+0000) > > I'd argue ADCs are the same way. I play both sides of bot (primary support secondary adc) so pretty much it's just "that second laner in general" with me at this point. Whether you get a support who literally hides behind your tier 2 turret so they don't get hit and tells you to stop feeding, an adc who got one early kill and decided to try a 2v4 everyone was pinging from miles away, or you get one or the other that just *can not fucking dodge*, it's always the other person's fault. It can never have anything to do with one laner playing poorly, it *has* to be the other guy, and it always inevitably makes it so that both fail equally. Yeah, for sure it's a two way thing, but the common culture is that Supps are never to blame and it's always an ADC overextending. It's never a Supp missing a critical skillshot on a snared target (Had a Pyke earlier today who couldn't land a Q on my Xayah snared targets...) or the Supp being too far ahead or too far behind. I'm all for both sides seeing their faults, but when have you seen a post anywhere where a Supp admits to mistakes? It's to the point that it has become a meme, where the Supp always babysits the AD and if the AD dies is their fault. I wish this changed, but I don't think it will.
SirEnds (NA)
: What tilts you the most?
I'll put em in tiers. 1 is the bane of my League experience, 3 are mild problems that may or may not get to me depending on the situation. TIER 1 - Mid inhitor down, Top and Bot free for the taking, team groups mid like it's ARAM, nothing is achieved. - Baron secured, two inhibis down, all we need is one final push, Jungler goes farm Gromp. - Bot/Mid inhibitor down, enemy has to deal with supers, Baron free to take, team goes wonder around enemy jungle for no reason. - {{champion:81}} - Riot Meddler - One-Item Arms Race Meta - The new NA lol esports site TIER 2 - Supports acting like they're incapable of making mistakes that cost a lane. It's always the ADC's fault. They'll never accept they've messed up. - Going 30 CS ahead in lane, enemy ADC gets a kill, my lead is gone. - Exit lane 7 - 0, Mid fed so we lose anyway. - Herald Takes 2 Towers. - Tanks that deal damage. TIER 3 - The new surrender box. - The client. - Lux Support (either side) - Chat box impossible to disable. Gotta drag to a corner or make -99 size
: So, I guess we're just ignoring the fact that Tahm can no longer support?
Sir Gusi (EUW)
: What's your most hated champs to play against
{{champion:81}} Is the most degenerate champion in the game. I'd rather fight 3 fed Yasuos and 2 fed Rivens than having to deal with a single Ezreal.
: I learned something new in bot lane
Depends on the situation. When you have a lead and enemy dies or recalls, but most importantly **you see enemy Jungler on the other side of the map** then it's ok to do it. If you're 0 - 2 as Jinx/Lux (one death each) vs Draven/Nami and you have no idea where the Jungler is, better not do it. Also, sometimes is better to keep your skills for poke or response to a gank and the AD can push the wave by themselves. Not the same helping an Ezreal/Kalista clear a wave than laning with a Trist or a Sivir. If your lane partner asks you to not hit minions, better leave em alone. They may be trying to freeze or get some form of lane control. Go on a player-by-player basis and situation-by-situation.
: Updating the Gameplay Rules
As long as it's not _Reddit 2: You can't post anything really_
D357R0Y3R (EUW)
: 6th version of ryze btw
Ok https://www.meme-arsenal.com/memes/d1e063d874347c97bda33f7ea754aa88.jpg
: What is this new surrender vote box?
: Patch 9.11 notes
Well, I was worried it would just be Chibi Demon Vi and that's exactly all it is. F for Galactic Gunner... {{sticker:zombie-nunu-bummed}}
: Neeko QOL change
Add .png[] at the end of your image plz.
: Tear upgrade for supports
You forgot its best effect: **Gain 1 True Damage on your abilities per mana stack. Upon reaching 750 Mana you gain 250 extra true damage on every ability.** Designed by CertainlyT and approved by Meddler. {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-rainbows}} ######Jokes aside, I really like the idea for the item :)
Alzon (NA)
: {{champion:78}} Diplomatic Immunity
> [{quoted}](name=Alzon,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=cyZ8uyR5,comment-id=000a,timestamp=2019-05-28T01:39:07.880+0000) > > {{champion:78}} Diplomatic Immunity This, so much. {{sticker:sg-poppy}}
Vacus (NA)
: Morde isn't the Master of Metal anymore, though.
> [{quoted}](name=Vacus,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=cxz5LQE6,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-05-28T01:46:14.847+0000) > > Morde isn't the Master of Metal anymore, though. https://imgur.com/Vz9ZqG9.png[] ... I'm trying https://imgur.com/hGOgS3x.png[] https://imgur.com/W8DGWC3.png[]
Rioter Comments
: I think part of the problem... if not ALL of the problem is the champ design pissing contest. Almost every champ that comes out, or gets reworked has some new "break the rules" nonsense in their kit. Akali of course had perfect stealth.... even under turret... Cause reasons! There is a reason that the pro scene is filled with mostly reworks and newer champs, theyre just plain better than the rest, like an arms race... If an older champ is played, they already had a highly mobile, high impact kit to begin with. LeBlanc and Lee Sin for example. Any other champ has flash forcing CC or some other such utility.
> [{quoted}](name=WeaselRune,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=AQmiZB2W,comment-id=0005000000010000,timestamp=2019-05-26T09:56:53.628+0000) > > I think part of the problem... if not ALL of the problem is the champ design pissing contest. > > Almost every champ that comes out, or gets reworked has some new "break the rules" nonsense in their kit. Akali of course had perfect stealth.... even under turret... Cause reasons! > > There is a reason that the pro scene is filled with mostly reworks and newer champs, theyre just plain better than the rest, like an arms race... If an older champ is played, they already had a highly mobile, high impact kit to begin with. LeBlanc and Lee Sin for example. Any other champ has flash forcing CC or some other such utility. I think this happened with Zoe (to think of a recent example) as well to an extent. It's like they conceive the kit of a character in a vacuum. _"Oh this ability would be fun..."_ But they don't really consider how it interacts with the rest of the game. Release Akali had built in sustain, the true stealth, lower cool downs, higher damage, massive mobility, etc. you name it. Zoe's W for instance I'm not sure how it's still in the game. Many trades Zoe wins come from the free use of Summoner Spells that a minion drops or that the enemy uses. Imagine a minion drops Ignite, then Zoe uses ignite, then uses the enemy's ignite. No cooldown, no mana cost, spamability. Zoe is bad, but it's not Akali bad. Zoe at least if you lock her down she's mega dead, and she at least has to land skill shots and keep her distance or whatever. Akali is Kalista levels of overload. I don't remember if it was DL or QT or _someone_ who at one point said _"There's no point in playing any other ADC cause Kalista does everything everyone else does and better"_ and I think that's Akali as an assassin to an extent. I don't know how they make her work without reworking her _or_ keeping her over nerfed and only viable for high elo one-tricks and pro play.
: Tahm Kench in top lane is filthy
: When blitzcrank grabs you, but you are tilt-proof
: Favorite rotating game mode
URF/AURF Sucks. I don't understand what people enjoy about it.
: Ryze's Ultimate Cannot Teleport Ryze to a Targeted Place If Ryze Recalls Back During the Porcess
Rioter Comments
Kazekiba (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Yordletana,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=AQmiZB2W,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2019-05-23T14:33:12.728+0000) > > To be fair to Akali fans, it's not their fault CertainlyT came and literally murdered the character's future. I have no idea what they thought was gonna happen with her new kit. They've removed half the passives she had at launch and she's **still** too hard to keep in check for high elo. > > It's like they haven't learned anything from the many Ryze fiascos or what happened with Mordekaiser, also courtesy of CertainlyT. The reason she was ever so strong in high elo, and by "strong" I mean "45% win rate and only picked 20-30% of the time when she's not banned in pro play" is because she has 3 dashes to escape with and a fourth, targeted dash Old Akali was an all-in faceroller, who had 3 dashes but *all* targeted. Albeit theoretically infinite number of them because she regained one whenever she got a kill/takedown. Her E dash backwards should legit be removed, and her second R cast be targeted (but keep the microstun on R1) then put a heal back on her passive. Why do they seem completely incapable of doing this
> [{quoted}](name=Kazekiba,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=AQmiZB2W,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2019-05-23T15:57:09.449+0000) > > The reason she was ever so strong in high elo, and by "strong" I mean "45% win rate and only picked 20-30% of the time when she's not banned in pro play" is because she has 3 dashes to escape with and a fourth, targeted dash > Old Akali was an all-in faceroller, who had 3 dashes but *all* targeted. Albeit theoretically infinite number of them because she regained one whenever she got a kill/takedown. > > Her E dash backwards should legit be removed, and her second R cast be targeted (but keep the microstun on R1) then put a heal back on her passive. > Why do they seem completely incapable of doing this We're at a point where win ratio has become irrelevant. This isn't even Yasuo/Zoe stuff. This is starting to look like Kalista/Morde/Ryze territory, and you never wanna go there. I have no idea what they're gonna end up doing with her.
D357R0Y3R (EUW)
: Where is this Akali rage comming from?
To be fair to Akali fans, it's not their fault CertainlyT came and literally murdered the character's future. I have no idea what they thought was gonna happen with her new kit. They've removed half the passives she had at launch and she's **still** too hard to keep in check for high elo. It's like they haven't learned anything from the many Ryze fiascos or what happened with Mordekaiser, also courtesy of CertainlyT.
: Akali is worse than RYZE at this point
Oh I remember your name, and I feel so bad for you cause I know you've been an Akali fan since way before CertainlyT turned her into Ryze 2.0 :(
GankLord (NA)
: Runes reforged was the beginning of the end (opinion)
No, that's too late. Juggernauts patch was _the beginning of the end_ imho.
Remus Wins (EUNE)
: Yuumi Actual Voice
Borderline YTP Love it :D
DELDE115 (EUW)
: MSI Finals. I wanna congratulate Team Liquid.
Yeah, it was amazing! No other team in 11 years of League of Legends had lost a Bo5 that fast! Truly a unique (and probably unbeatable) record!
Sukishoo (NA)
: Yes, more missions each week. Tomorrow starts the next set and the 27th is the last.
> [{quoted}](name=Sukishoo,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=T87ELd1x,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-05-20T01:20:36.853+0000) > > Yes, more missions each week. Tomorrow starts the next set and the 27th is the last. Thank you {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
Rioter Comments
: Yuumi proves how utterly clueless this forum is.
> [{quoted}](name=MyTeamAreIdiots,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=QThKL3eI,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-05-18T19:13:50.747+0000) > Mark. https://imgur.com/naREc3B.png[]
: I think you're missing my points. First, no, garbage work environment at Riot doesn't excuse nasty exchanges between shareholders at a different organization. That does make it shitty and hypocritical that Riot demands "action be taken or endanger your LCS status" when Riot themselves did little to nothing in aftermath of multiple reports of their bad environment. Secondly, why should Riot involve themselves? It wasn't between two organizations, it was internal. Using examples of MonteCristo or Donald Sterling (which in each case were shady and overstepping appropriate responses) doesn't justify another massive overstep. Third if Riot wanted a real solution or problem solving, they would bring those shareholders and leadership in Riot's LCS structure together to find a resolution, not dangle an ominous threat that could linger over innocent bystanders like the Echo Fox players and coaches.
> [{quoted}](name=ChompyWulf,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=XIAOIipF,comment-id=0002000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-16T05:51:47.111+0000) > > I think you're missing my points. > > First, no, garbage work environment at Riot doesn't excuse nasty exchanges between shareholders at a different organization. > That does make it shitty and hypocritical that Riot demands "action be taken or endanger your LCS status" when Riot themselves did little to nothing in aftermath of multiple reports of their bad environment. > > Secondly, why should Riot involve themselves? It wasn't between two organizations, it was internal. Using examples of MonteCristo or Donald Sterling (which in each case were shady and overstepping appropriate responses) doesn't justify another massive overstep. > > Third if Riot wanted a real solution or problem solving, they would bring those shareholders and leadership in Riot's LCS structure together to find a resolution, not dangle an ominous threat that could linger over innocent bystanders like the Echo Fox players and coaches. First: This isn't about _"Oh, Riot's hypocritical"_ or what they've done within themselves. This is about the LCS organizer and owner making sure the financial partners they have agreements with is not out there misrepresenting the values of the business they own. Should they also improve themselves? Yeah, but that's a different issue. Stop bringing _"reports of their bad environment"_ because that's irrelevant to this case. They're both separate and I don't understand why you keep bringing it up. Second: Because Riot are the organizers and owners of the business called "League of Legends Championship Series" and EchoFox is a party financially and morally attached to the brand. This isn't a "massive overstep". It's an investor that represents EchoFox and by extension the LCS engaging in reproachable conduct. I have no idea why you're still trying to make it about _"Oh but Riot has also done shit stuff"_ and then use that as an excuse. Third: The only person _"endangering innocent bystanders"_ was the man who engaged in racist behavior, knowing full well he's a representative of his investment, the company he stands for and the League his team plays in. Riot has rules in place for their business partners. If the partners break such rules, Riot has the full right to demand something to right that wrong, and you need to stop pretending like this is Riot _"Going too far"_ because frankly it's an absurd concept.
: In the case of both Renegades and Sterling, there are major issues. Riot refused to give any evidence of wrongdoing by MonteCristo and others. CLG was busted for poaching, they got suspensions. Renegades and Team Dragon Knights were accused of misleading trades and were banned. (MonteCristo was banned for additional reasons which were also not proven) Even some of Donald Sterling's critics felt the NBA had gone too far. They not only banned him, they then went after him and his wife who was a co-owner pushing them to sell their team. That's insane to punish him THAT far as well as his innocent co-owner. Riot has no right to involve itself directly in an argument between shareholders of the SAME TEAM. And frankly, screw Rick Fox. He's a rat for making the issue public and kicking off the external forces rather than being a man and helping settle things between his business partners, which by all reports they have started trying to smooth out already! The power trips this company goes on are insane and they are way out of line in this case.
> [{quoted}](name=ChompyWulf,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=XIAOIipF,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-05-16T02:02:54.913+0000) > > In the case of both Renegades and Sterling, there are major issues. > > Riot refused to give any evidence of wrongdoing by MonteCristo and others. CLG was busted for poaching, they got suspensions. Renegades and Team Dragon Knights were accused of misleading trades and were banned. (MonteCristo was banned for additional reasons which were also not proven) > > Even some of Donald Sterling's critics felt the NBA had gone too far. They not only banned him, they then went after him and his wife who was a co-owner pushing them to sell their team. That's insane to punish him THAT far as well as his innocent co-owner. > > Riot has no right to involve itself directly in an argument between shareholders of the SAME TEAM. And frankly, screw Rick Fox. He's a rat for making the issue public and kicking off the external forces rather than being a man and helping settle things between his business partners, which by all reports they have started trying to smooth out already! > > The power trips this company goes on are insane and they are way out of line in this case. When did I ask for Riot to go after this person's family? All I said was that Riot is being extremely generous with the time given to EchoFox. Riot aren't white angels or anything even close resembling that, but this person deserves investigating, and **if proof is found**, consequences should follow. If you wanna go ahead and attempt to excuse racism or hope the person goes unpunished based on some bullshit reason like _"Others do it in Riot so he should be able to get away with it"_ , then good luck with that. The need for Riot to improve their working conditions and fix their internal bullshit has nothing to do with this investor getting away with his attitude within a company that represents the LCS. One thing doesn't excuse the other, and I don't know why you think it should be different.
: Whoa, wtf?
Riot are actually being incredibly lenient with EchoFox. MonteCristo was given 10 days to get his shit straight and then was forced to sell his LCS spot when the Renegades thing happened. NBA owner Donald Sterling had a racist outburst in 2015 and was eventually forced to sell his team: the Clippers. Riot are giving EF 60 days to get rid of a single person. Rick Fox has been an amazing positive presence to have in the LCS. I'm happy action is being taken and I hope Rick stays.
LTK KoRo (EUW)
: played my fair share of alistar,leona and gragas supp in this and last season, i won't play 50 games just to give you a proof. Botlaners just whine too hard, and usually the whiners are the inferior part of botlane duo
> [{quoted}](name=LTK KoRo,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=WiZTzKnk,comment-id=0016000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-15T18:41:42.621+0000) > > played my fair share of alistar,leona and gragas supp in this and last season, i won't play 50 games just to give you a proof. Botlaners just whine too hard, and usually the whiners are the inferior part of botlane duo Cool. Can't take you seriously then.
Show more

Yordletana

Level 215 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion