D357R0Y3R (EUW)
: I don't have to deal with it, anyone with memory and with elo above d1 would have remembered how bullshit he was basically above d1 he was 100% picked/banned he went top, autowon lane against all melees with high base armor as an anti mage, and high base hp regen with little mana cost, tankiness, mobility, cc, and ranged spells? how was that balanced? there is a reason he got olafed galio as a design, tank or mage, or assassin, or support, is always broken and requieres nerfs his rework was S H I T and solcrushed left the design team thank god
WOW NO PROOF OR ANYTHING TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIMS WOW. Even when your claims make NO SENSE. 1:Galio top was not the most played top and galio was more of a mid not a top MEANING NO HE WAS NOT AUTO WIN YOU'RE JUST LYING. 2: it sounds like you played ONE game vs galio on release AND NEVER AGAIN. Riot nerfed his armor that is why I said the galio in summer of season 7 unless you think galio has high armor now which is doesn't. But you know what GALIO NEVER HAD HIGH ARMOR THE MOST IT HAS EVER BEEN IS 27 lower basically every tank in the game. Talk about bs. Like I can go basically to every point you made and prove it's wrong and unlike you show PROOF.
D357R0Y3R (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=boricCentaur1,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ftA7dEFM,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-07-11T09:56:41.154+0000) > > When tank galio was the norm he was balanced. no he was not
He was deal with it. He could be buffed and nerfed with breaking or killing him, had more consistent player count. The fact the there was basically no buffs or nerfs to him in the summer until riot make him a ap burst mage,he could be played top and mid, being a tank makes more sense with the champion, is more fun to fight. Like I can remember galio in the summer of season 7 there were tanks that were better then him but he was not bad. Love when people say something with no proof.
: new akali rework is a fail. as a akali main il simply say why. she is simply to versatile now. and because of her current new overloaded kit. they have to constantly nerf her because they can't get her balanced at all. the rework wil be a succes once she stops needing nerfs 24/7. old akali was a nightmare for low elo players to play against. but was extremely underpowered in high elo. because everyone knew how to counter her. and was therefore a bit more balanced. i'm purely speaking on it from a balancing perspective. i am fine personally with either the new or the old. but you have to admit her balancing atm is a nightmare{{sticker:sg-soraka}}
Akali rework was a success if you think it was a failure you have no clue why she was reworked or why champions get reworked. AND STOP USING WORDS LIKE OVERLOADED SINCE YOU'RE USING THEM WRONG, she is not overloaded like at all and you saying she is, is not proof it's the opposite. Is her playrate the same as the old one NOPE meaning it was a success, the main reason riot reworks champions is to give them life and make them easier to balance and old akali does that more people play her, she can be buffed or nerfed without making her op or shit. Old akali was not more balanced like WHAT she could not be buffed without breaking the game, and she was bad for the majority of her life and the only thing she could do was snowball because of uninteractive her kit was. Also new akali having balance problems has nothing to do with the discussion here so idk why you're being it since my point is that she is more balanced then the old one.
manolis201 (EUNE)
: Lethality vs Armor.
And yet people will still stay lethality counters armor and needs to be nerfed.
Cloud273 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=ThatShinyPiplup,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=7fG37vhy,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2019-07-12T00:29:00.970+0000) > > As someone that plays Fizz, these buffs definitely help but they don't affect any of the areas that matter when it comes to the reasons typically complain about him. From what I can tell, all this does is help him a little bit early game, it definitely isn't going to make him top tier or anything. He is already top tier. Have you seen his winrate? 53% in gold and plat, and 52% in diamond. I didn't bother looking at other divisions, but if he's doing this well in gold-diamond he's a problem. https://na.op.gg/statistics/champion/
Winrate means nothing since his playrate is not high and he basically has no banrate. Meaning statistically he is weak.DON'T USE STATISTICS TO DEFEND YOUR ARGUMENT IF YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO USE THEM. He is bad, there is basically 0 reasons to pick him, he damage is lower then most assassins, he has no wave clear without losing damage, he has low range, LeBlanc can basically do everything he can do but much safer and more effective.
: Armor is the most useless stat in the game is much less gold efficient than MR. ({{item:3155}} is the most gold efficient item btw.) Also you forgot {{item:3174}} {{item:3222}} .
Armor is MUCH MUCH BETTER THEN MR since the items are better, the majority of mr items do nothing for most champions and are only built for the mr, the only ones that are not like that are {{item:3222}} ,{{item:3231}} and {{item:3174}} and MAYBE IF YOU'RE LIKE MAOKAI OR MUNDO {{item:3065}}. Two of them do the exact same thing and two are only built on enchanters. {{item:3068}} ,{{item:3076}} ,{{item:3047}} {{item:3025}} and {{item:3157}} and that's is not even all of them. Those are armor items that are built for more then the armor and things champions actually WANT to build. Building mr 90% of the item hurts your build since they're just bad items. Fun fact {{item:3155}} sucks dick if you think it's good then you're lying to yourself. The majority of champions will lose to much for building it since the upgrade is not good and the stats you get from it are not good. It is ONLY good vs heavily ap teams or as a 6th maybe 5th items. Like gold effectively doesn't mean much in the actual game. Like I see you all the time making post about how armor sucks and how good mr is BUT YOU CAN'T BACK ANY OF IT UP.
: Explanation of why the damage meta will never stop
In summary nothing you said is right. Games are about 30 mins long which is about the average for league. Cdr is only high on TWO classes nothing else. Tanks are good if you think there bad then you clearly don't have tanks and should not talk about them. THERE ARE NO ONE SHOTS RIGHT NOW UNLESS SOMEONE IS VERY FED unless there assassins but they have always done that. God why do people keep crying about damage when it's not a problem.
: Lux DOES NOT need these compensation buffs on her ult
Soooooooo how does this has ANYTHING TO DO WITH SUPPORT LUX? This is for mid lane lux who is currently fine and doesn't need nerfs. They're trying to nerf support lux without hurting mid lux. This buff doesn't do anything for support lux since she doesn't build a lot of ap.
: Riot you cant really be thinking about Buffing Lux's Ult damage....
Yeah that's fucking bs and you know it. It's actually impossible, So lets do the math on pbe lux has a 80% ap scaling on her ult meaning at a 1000 ap and her ult has a max base damage is 500 that means HER ULT WILL AT MOST DO 1300 with a amount of ap almost impossible to get especially with the current lux build. Like 1300 is true damage bty since I have not EVEN done the math for the mr yet. STOP LYING! I don't even disagree I think buffing the scaling on the ult is not good but you should be lie to be a point.
: Revert Galio's W and R
The only problem with the galio rework is that riot keeps trying to balance him to be ap when it doesn't work. When tank galio was the norm he was balanced. Also having basically no playrate SHOWS A BALANCE PROBLEM WTF.
MaFyO2154 (EUW)
: the game would be less toxic if the game would be more enjoyable
Yeah no if you get one shot IT'S YOUR FAULT FOR FEEDING. Like no damage is not a problem if you think it is then go actually play the game since it's not. Also unlike you I have PROOF look at the champions being played there not high damage champions. If damage was strong champions like draven, damage supporters, bursts mages would be the most played but there not. The top played champions in diamond are mostly champions with utility not damage kaisa,ez and you have things like tank karma and the the large amount of the supports are all utility and tanks no damage dealers. Damage is fine deal with it.
Rioter Comments
: It sucks we can't have the old league back...
LOL love that people somehow believe this even when it just not true. 1: Zoe is just weaker old nidalee. 2: Teemo shrooms ARE MUCH weaker compared to old league. 3: Basically every assassin was actually strong in old league like I not making this up like look at almost any assassin and think what was there strongest point and it would be in the older seasons. 4: Less tank items. 5: There is actually a reason to fight over lanes in all points of the game unlike old seasons where there was basically no reason to go top. Like NAME ME THE CHAMPION THAT HAS BEEN POWER CREEP since I can't think of any all old champions reached there peak in the old seasons. New champions don't have much more in damage compared to old champions meaning you're just wrong. A lot of the times it's utility that makes new champions good like no one thought sylas was good because of damage it was healing. Do you want me to keep listening things since I have not even gotten to things like ap yi? You know what I can't remember happening in older seasons damage champions GOING TANK when it should be the opposite if damage is too high.
: Popular Opinion: AD assassins are hella overtuned
Good scaling YEP YOU ARE TROLLING. Actives NOPE,lifesteal NOPE, not mana restricted yes they are go play talon or zed since they can't spam abilities. They also need damage and mobility SINCE THAT IS HOW THEY FUNCTION. They need to get to the backline and there role is to take out a champion fast meaning high burst damage is a must. Like 100% of this post is basically about Kat and has basically nothing to do with any ad assassin in the game. It's really sad that you put basically 0 seconds of thought into a post since to get upvotes.
: Riot, will you ever nerf OP tahm kench in top lane?
All you have to do vs tamh as kayle is FARM and let him push then once you're level 11 you just win vs him he can't do anything and even before 11 you can poke him down pretty easily.
: I still can't believe they released Dunkmaster Ivern
Dunkmaster ivern is soooo fucking bad like it's without any doubt the worst skin in the game not including one that aged poorly. It should be removed and the 7 people who bought get it refunded.
FkValeRly (EUW)
: his telling you how to survive lane against a kennen as a melee champion and to "mitigate poke", this is equivalent to telling a darius player how to survive lane against a nasus, kennen outscales almost all melee champions so "surviving" isn't what you wanna do at all.
Ummmm are you actually trolling???? WHO THE FUCK DOES KENNEN OUT SCALE???? IN TOP LANE???? Like basically every top lane wins 1v1s vs him since most of kennens power is IN TEAM FIGHTS he is shit at 1v1ing he doesn't have the hp or survivability to take longer trades and he doesn't have the burst or poke for shorter trades so wtf are you talking about. Jax is a popular top laner, jax in lane can easily kill kennen when he pushes up to far and out of lanning jax can just jump on him and kill him while Keenan will just at most get one stun off but he will still not get any damage off meaning kennen has to lose cs to keep his waves in a place where he can't die and he has to look for team fights since he can't 1v1. Mord is a popular one, mords w will get to a point where basically it stops anything kennen can do and that point of about first item Remember BASICALLY EVERY TOP LANER HAS CC OR A DASH A LOT HAVE BOTH whereas all kennen has is a ms buff and a slow stun meaning he doesn't scale well in 1v1s since he basically becomes a adc or a mage. So fun fact in diamond basically all of the top played champions are melee meaning range tops are not OP if they were they would be played more. This idea that range tops are unbeatable is a fucking joke.
: Shill alert... you arn't going to be an admin so learn to think for yourself.
Funny SINCE YOU HAVE NO ARGUMENT AT ALL, YOU GIVE NO PROOF AT ALL, AND YOU'RE JUST CALLING PEOPLE SHILLS AS A DEFENSE LOL. I give fucking reasons and examples how is not that thinking? Not thinking would just be saying some bs with no proof like what you did! You are just mad league is not stat check champions anymore.
: > [{quoted}](name=boricCentaur1,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=wJ0ZEAQW,comment-id=0000000200000000,timestamp=2019-07-05T10:41:57.232+0000) > > Holy fuck you're either trolling or trying to be disingenuous. I NEVER SAID BORK WAS BAD, I FUCKING SAID PEOPLE BUILD IT. I basically said the same thing as you comparing bt and bork you fucking troll. I CAN SEE MY OWN POST TO KNOW THAT. > > Here is what I said about bork bty "some that go into {{item:3153}} but NOT FOR THE LIFESTEAL for the on hit and the passive." Then here is what you said "BT is a good pick if you don't use BOTRK active" really fucking similar and I even said it could be built as a healing item on some champions. > > It's really sad you have to LIE to defend your argument lol. Guy just say your wrong lying solves nothing it shows you have no clue what you're talking about. > > Also love that you stop talking about the rest of the items I said were bad but THE ONE I WAS SAID WAS GOOD YOU LIE ABOUT SAY I SAY I SAID IT WAS BAD lol. > > So how about YOU TALK ABOUT THE ITEMS I ACTUALLY CALLED BAD AND SAID THAT BUILDING THEM IS TROLLING! O you mostly won't since it's was super wrong. I did. All those items you mentioned are built by all those players if you look at more than one game. I only mentioned botrk in one.
Guy just you know nothing you don't play any adc, you have no proof, you're lying. Like when did I say the passive on {{item:3231}} was bad???? When I said THAT WAS THE ONLY REASON TO BUILD IT. You have NOT SHOWN ANYTHING OF THE ITEMS I MENTIONED SINCE YOU HAVE ONLY POINTED OUT ITEMS I SAID WEREN'T BAD. Like also you still have not given any proof to lifesteal being a problem at all. Again TALK ABOUT THE ITEMS I SAID WERE BAD or just admit you're wrong. Also you showing people build items is not proof it means almost nothing since you change parts of your build every game it especially MEANS NOTHING WHEN YOU LINK PLAYERS WHO ONLY PLAY FOR MMR. Like they have basically no games played on there recently.
Neriticc (EUW)
: Remember guys, Fizz is allowed to be untargetable every 5 seconds.
Also remember that a lot of his damage comes from it and it's his only wave clear, and HE CAN'T DO ANYTHING WHILE IN IT meaning you actually lose damage and safety if you use it to dodge a ability. Also it WILL NEVER GET CLOSE TO 0 COOLDOWN stop lying. I'm sorry you don't like a ability that has draw backs for using it and that it makes you THINK about how to fight fizz.
: > [{quoted}](name=boricCentaur1,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=wJ0ZEAQW,comment-id=00000002,timestamp=2019-07-04T17:37:08.958+0000) > > Ummmm what? NO ONE BUILDS THOSE ITEMS. The majority of adcs go into crit then {{item:3080}} as there lifesteal but only if the game goes to full build, there are some that go into {{item:3153}} but NOT FOR THE LIFESTEAL for the on hit and the passive. > > Like wtf are you talking about? > {{item:3156}} sucks dick and you're most likely trolling if you're building it on adc there are VERY VERY few times where a adc can build it. > {{item:3812}} you're basically trolling if you build it, it doesn't do anything it's just worst {{item:3080}} on adc like wtf adcs never and will never build this. > {{item:3139}} it's only built for the passive nothing else no one builds it for lifesteal. > > Actually the only item you listed that are built for healing is {{item:3812}} and maybe {{item:3153}} on some champions. > > Like ALL YOU DID WAS LIST ITEMS WITH HEALING IN THEM WITHOUT ACTUALLY THINKING OF WHAT THEY DO. No reason other then random bs that is 100% wrong adcs are not tanky even with lifesteal basically almost every assassin will one shot them if they want more defense {{item:3046}} and {{item:3026}} are better then basically every lifesteal item. The point of lifesteal is not to be more tanky it's help deal with tanks,poke, and the closest it gets to being tanky is healing during kiting but that's it. > > I can easily do the math if you want me to and go into MUCH more detail but the better solution is for you to play and watch some adcs and learn them doing that. > > > Lifesteal is not a problem like idk why you think it is since basically NO ONE GETS IT. My best guess is your mad you lost to a fed draven building wrong and you're now blaming items instead of yourself. What you just listed is a bronze thing from players that can never remember to use their active items. BT is a good pick if you don't use BOTRK active and don't want to learn. You're literally listing things people to when they give up on trying to be competitive. Buy sword but cleanse active on it is useless...okay... https://na.op.gg/summoner/userName=Macr0+King 59% win rate Master ADCs with "useless sword" cool. 57% Diamond 1 with other "useless sword" https://na.op.gg/summoner/userName=KingRavenZ 59% Grand Master spamming the useless BOTRK over BT, what a noob. https://na.op.gg/summoner/userName=LL+Trigger It's a wonder they escaped Iron.
Holy fuck you're either trolling or trying to be disingenuous. I NEVER SAID BORK WAS BAD, I FUCKING SAID PEOPLE BUILD IT. I basically said the same thing as you comparing bt and bork you fucking troll. I CAN SEE MY OWN POST TO KNOW THAT. Here is what I said about bork bty "some that go into {{item:3153}} but NOT FOR THE LIFESTEAL for the on hit and the passive." Then here is what you said "BT is a good pick if you don't use BOTRK active" really fucking similar and I even said it could be built as a healing item on some champions. It's really sad you have to LIE to defend your argument lol. Guy just say your wrong lying solves nothing it shows you have no clue what you're talking about. Also love that you stop talking about the rest of the items I said were bad but THE ONE I WAS SAID WAS GOOD YOU LIE ABOUT SAY I SAY I SAID IT WAS BAD lol. So how about YOU TALK ABOUT THE ITEMS I ACTUALLY CALLED BAD AND SAID THAT BUILDING THEM IS TROLLING! O you mostly won't since it's was super wrong.
: It's tough to say what toplane needs
Yeah my opinion on hashinshin is that he should NEVER be listen to. Like I remember way back before swain was reworked he was asking for swain nerfs keep in mind this was season 7 swain and that was the moment I knew he was bs. Guy has 0 clue what he is talking about. In my opinion the biggest problem in top lane is snowball, riot should shift power from early game to mid and land game with a lot of the champions and buff the defensive starting items for top lane.
: > [{quoted}](name=boricCentaur1,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=AA7etzJE,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-07-04T23:45:02.027+0000) > > Ummm no mobility is not what makes a assassin. A assassin is just someone that can quickly take a champion out of a fight with damage. So according to League’s playerbase that would make like 99% of the champions an assassin.
The league playerbase will always say damage is too high even if the only champions being played are tanks with no damage. They will also say there is too much cc, too much mobility, too much survivability.
Kazekiba (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=boricCentaur1,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=AA7etzJE,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-07-04T23:45:02.027+0000) > > Ummm no mobility is not what makes a assassin. A assassin is just someone that can quickly take a champion out of a fight with damage. ... nope. Assassins specifically have to be able to move through a fight and burst down a single target, and have tools in their kit to escape pursuit or leave fights after the kill. *Ekko IS an Assassin* so calling her AD Ekko is admitting shes an Assassin. Fun fact: {{champion:84}}{{champion:28}} Assassin {{champion:131}} {{champion:56}} NOT Assassins.
Ummm what? Ekko can easily burst people down and so can noc in fact riot list noc as a assassin. Idk where this "calling her ad ekko" comes from but it makes no sense since ekko has much higher burst and can run from a fight MUST better then her. Assassins have to be able to move around a fight since that's how they can get to the back line that's it since AGAIN there jobs and role is to take a champion out quickly. Noc gets in a fight takes out the carry or something then has to escape but he still did the job of a assassin. Noc doesn't have sustain damage, he is not tanky. Like wtf makes him not a assassin. Diana is supposed to have sustain damage not burst she is similar to wukong in that because of how items and meta is the assassin build is better. Also riot has said champions like wukong and diana can be both assassins and bruisers. Like I can prove my point you can't riot has said MANY times what assassins do and I basically got what I said the definition was from the league of legends wiki. Like there is nothing to support your claim.
: She doesn't have to 1 shoot to be an assassin As long as she has Dashes and Stealth then yes she is
Ummm no mobility is not what makes a assassin. A assassin is just someone that can quickly take a champion out of a fight with damage.
Sir Gusi (EUW)
: These are champs I feel are too strong and the others too weak
These are champions who I think should be nerfed. {{champion:266}} ,{{champion:82}},{{champion:39}} , {{champion:145}} ,{{champion:64}} well not because lee is op but he has just been good for too long in my opinion. Champions who need buffs in opinion are {{champion:3}} ,{{champion:62}} ,{{champion:150}} ,{{champion:246}} ,{{champion:133}} and especially {{champion:34}} like when was the last time she got ANY CHANGES since it's has been awhile and she is shit there is basically no reason to pick her over {{champion:136}}, {{champion:69}} and {{champion:90}} since they all have better clear, more cc, better damage and basically everything LIKE WE HAD A ASSASSIN META WERE SHE HAS NEVER PLAYED like zed came back this season and nothing morg and lulu should up more as counters instead that should show how shit she is compared to other mid laners.
iiGazeii (NA)
: We need more ways to outplay Pyke's ult
Ummmm I hate to break this to you but pyke is a support not a solo lane meaning by the time he gets enough times to do that with his ult AT MOST IT'S LIKE 40% if you have low scaling hp and he will actually NEVER get to that point unless the game goes on for like 40 mins. Also the base is going down by 100 too. Also dodging and flashing is MORE then enough counter play.
JackMcCarry (EUNE)
: Dont you toplaners always cry about how the lane is all about counter picks? Now it's a good thing?
Toplaners only complain about them because they just want a reason to how they why lost since instead of what could of have done better and also toplaners ONLY WANT TO PLAY FEW CHAMPIONS having counters makes them learn other champions. Counter picks make it so you can't randomly pick a champion you have to think and it encourages team work. There are no downsides to having counter picks.
Kelg (NA)
: They need to remove the excess of lifesteal from almost every item that has it. {{item:3153}} Should just be an anti hp stacking item {{item:3156}} why can adcs even use this? should be melee only {{item:3812}} should be melee only as well {{item:3139}} you build this for the cc cleanse not lifesteal Some of these champs become more tanky than juggernauts late game{{champion:145}} {{champion:119}}(looking at you guys) and right click you down in a few hits, while fully healing any damage you do to them. It's gross.
Ummmm what? NO ONE BUILDS THOSE ITEMS. The majority of adcs go into crit then {{item:3080}} as there lifesteal but only if the game goes to full build, there are some that go into {{item:3153}} but NOT FOR THE LIFESTEAL for the on hit and the passive. Like wtf are you talking about? {{item:3156}} sucks dick and you're most likely trolling if you're building it on adc there are VERY VERY few times where a adc can build it. {{item:3812}} you're basically trolling if you build it, it doesn't do anything it's just worst {{item:3080}} on adc like wtf adcs never and will never build this. {{item:3139}} it's only built for the passive nothing else no one builds it for lifesteal. Actually the only item you listed that are built for healing is {{item:3812}} and maybe {{item:3153}} on some champions. Like ALL YOU DID WAS LIST ITEMS WITH HEALING IN THEM WITHOUT ACTUALLY THINKING OF WHAT THEY DO. No reason other then random bs that is 100% wrong adcs are not tanky even with lifesteal basically almost every assassin will one shot them if they want more defense {{item:3046}} and {{item:3026}} are better then basically every lifesteal item. The point of lifesteal is not to be more tanky it's help deal with tanks,poke, and the closest it gets to being tanky is healing during kiting but that's it. I can easily do the math if you want me to and go into MUCH more detail but the better solution is for you to play and watch some adcs and learn them doing that. Lifesteal is not a problem like idk why you think it is since basically NO ONE GETS IT. My best guess is your mad you lost to a fed draven building wrong and you're now blaming items instead of yourself.
: Riot shill alert... I didn't read it past the first line. Don't worry, I'm sure the admin will pat you on the head and feed you a cookie.
Basically you said I'm right. Like again proving you are nothing but a troll saying stuff for attention since your post could not be more wrong. Since you're just wrong and UNLIKE YOU I USED PROOF whereas you have nothing.
: League of Legends 2019: The Age of Entitlement
Are you trolling? Like WTF. Zoe HAS ONE OF THE BIGGEST CLEAREST FOCUSES IN THE WHILE GAME you pick zoe because she can easily pick people off that is it. You lose aoe cc, sustain damage, aoe damage, peel, etc. Like wtf are you talking about "these champions as you do not need to really give up anything to play these." That show you shouldn't be talking about this since that is SO FUCKING WRONG it hurts my head. LIKE ZOE HAS MORE COUNTER PLAY THEN ANNIE stop being biased please. Zoe has doesn't have a lot of mobility if you think she does you fucking lying. Annie is bad not because she has to little it's the opposite she has too MUCH point and click cc,peel, self peel, single target burst damage, aoe burst damage, poke,and aoe cc like that is MUCH MORE THEN ZOE and unlike zoe you can't dodge her abilities. THE REASON THE MAJORITY OF CHAMPIONS ARE REWORK IS BECAUSE THERE KITS ARE DO TO MUCH. Akali could not be buffed without being broken, Aatrox could not be buffed without him being broken, mundo unkillable damage dealer when he is good. Like old champions were general champions that's why they are bad since riot can't buff them without them being too good. So stop with this bs you're just showing your biased as fuck. Like champions are designed around core strengths zoe's kit based around her q and not much else.
Moody P (NA)
: Why is Bard being nerfed on PBE?
They're trying to get you to max e last for some fucking reason idk why they don't buff the w. So if you max e last this IS actually a buff a stupid fucking buff but a buff. They are not trying to nerf him.
: Teamfight Tactics-- /Dev Update: Your Feedback and the Road Ahead
I don't think people want more guaranteed drops they want everyone to the same amount of items then problem fixed you still have items be different making the game different every time without it feelings like shit. Like I don't care if I will always get one item if some else still gets a MORE THEN ME especially then items are so strong.
RaQqa (EUNE)
: Just please, don't overbuff Qiyana because of her wr now.
Let me just do some math so her q is 160 plus 90% and you said frozen so no bonus damage ok and her passive does 83 plus 55% ok since she is a assassin I'm going to assume you build either bruiser or lethality meaning her autos on there own will not do much. Soooo FUCK NO SHE WILL NEVER DO THAT DAMAGE the numbers are not there. 2.5k damage with a q and auto attack what fucking bs. One shotting someone as sona is more believable this.
: Whenever people bring up the hectic nature of toplane, Vayne is always mentioned
What do you mean VAYNE TOP IS OP that's why no one plays it.
: > [{quoted}](name=DGAGAAsharpAGD,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=jcnkX6B3,comment-id=0001000000000000,timestamp=2019-07-03T22:06:39.193+0000) > > Yeah, let me just sidestep his q+grasp that takes 1/6 of my hp at lvl1, pure counterplay. He has counter-play but that's not where it is. You *counter-build* the low level Q with things like Doran's Shield and Second Wind. You *counter-play* the barrels.
And so do assassins you can build armor, most assassins fall off hard, if you have good clear you can easily shut down talon, kat is easy beat with cc, and zed you can dodge q or cc him. All that is just a min of thought too. Like I would say 90% of assassins have MUCH more counter play then GP.
NY64 (NA)
: What happened to the Warden class?
Why are you being disingenuous? Like your title is about the class but then you only talk about how SUPPORTS are bad like WHAT. Also the majority of wardens are top laners bruam and tahm are the only two supports, taric is a enchanter first then a tank, galio was almost never a support and support galio basically not no nerfs for it soo idk what your talking about. Here is how support works you pick a enchanter if you want peel, you pick a tank if you want engage, you pick a mage if you want damage. That is a very general overview of the support lane but champions like braum are a outlier and always have been. Wardens are a majority top based class.
IttanMomen (EUNE)
: Can we *** nerf yasuo ? because it's so fking frustrating to play vs him !!!!
Ummmm no he is fine, like just learn how to play vs him. Champions being frustrating to play against is one of the stupidest reasons to nerf a champion SINCE NEWSFLASH THAT IS A OPINION NOT A REASON. Yas is ok but not op I would easily pick irelia vs yas since she can do more. A lot of the reason is played in soloQ is because he can easily solo carry but that's it, that is why he is basically not played in lcs and his play rates fall the more competitive the regions.
Galiö (NA)
: Galio changes on PBE
WHY THE ACTUAL FUCK DO THEY THINK INCREASING THE AP SCALING IS GOOD. Like its good if anything it should be lowered. Does that riot balance team just not understand that ap galio is fucking terrible to have in the game like when ever ap galio is good he is just fucking bs to fight since he becomes a tanky cc bot that can also one shot HOW IS THAT FAIR. Also not I'm not talking about bruiser galio just pure ap galio. Add mr scaling, give him more scaling on his passive but nerf it on the rest of his kit just do things like this since it pushes away from ap galio.
: Lux Mains right now...
Yeah but they're gutting lux that's my problem. Also most post I see and them saying the nerfs are too much not that she doesn't need nerfs. Also where were you when karthus players wanted a rune removed just because they didn't want karthus nerfed.
: I'm looking forward to Riot's explanation of why they're reverting this mechanic
Champion that has been basically ok for seasons even with a shit load of buffs but with no buffs becomes meta hmmmmm It has to be that lux is broken not that she does really well in the meta right now and will probably go back to being ok after this meta NOOOO CAN'T BE THAT. Riot should just nerf her numbers there is nothing to suggest that the parts they're removing make her to good in fact it's the opposite lux has been ok to bad with those mechanics in her kit meaning they're most likely NOT the cause of her being overturned and will just end up killing the champion.
D357R0Y3R (EUW)
: 9.14 changes according to Riot Repertoir (Blitzcrank, Leona, Akali, Lux, Tahm kench)
The akali changes are cool and I love the poppy changes. But the leona and especially the lux ones are just stupid.
: > [{quoted}](name=boricCentaur1,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=7c76vP0A,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-07-01T20:52:53.818+0000) > > Wait I just looked she is actually being gutted wtf WTF. There not even hitting what makes her annoying meaning we will just end up with a annoying and bad champion wtf riot. Like if you're going to change lux nerf his q r combo but nope riot is trying to do a shift in power but it is actually just a MASSIVE NERF. Like the w is just SO FUCKING BAD AFTER THIS SHE WAS NOT EVEN BROKEN, she should be nerfed but this hard. > > She has also been good for like 3 patches but nothing for thresh WTF is riot doing. Also the biggest problem is lux is actually not that good she is a good right now because of how the meta is meaning when it changes because of these hard nerfs she will be pure shit. That's why I'm mad If Lux support is the problem then go ahead and nerf it , don't nerf both Support and Mage lux
> [{quoted}](name=Kitsune Kawaii,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=7c76vP0A,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-07-01T21:08:55.812+0000) > > That's why I'm mad > If Lux support is the problem then go ahead and nerf it , don't nerf both Support and Mage lux Like why not nerf her q root and her base damage on both r and q but buff the scaling this kills lux support and lets lux mid keep the utility of her w while also making her less annoying to fight which is why a lot people complain. But also lux support is good but it doesn't deserve to be fucking gutted unless riot wants her to be only as a mid laner but like you said they're nerfing mid lux too even with the w change since it takes off her utility making her just a q r bot.
Rioter Comments
: Why is Mage Lux getting nerfed?
Wait I just looked she is actually being gutted wtf WTF. There not even hitting what makes her annoying meaning we will just end up with a annoying and bad champion wtf riot. Like if you're going to change lux nerf his q r combo but nope riot is trying to do a shift in power but it is actually just a MASSIVE NERF. Like the w is just SO FUCKING BAD AFTER THIS SHE WAS NOT EVEN BROKEN, she should be nerfed but this hard. She has also been good for like 3 patches but nothing for thresh WTF is riot doing. Also the biggest problem is lux is actually not that good she is a good right now because of how the meta is meaning when it changes because of these hard nerfs she will be pure shit.
: Maybe if Qiyana was AP she would have been more fun to play,
: > [{quoted}](name=boricCentaur1,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=YEE8FH84,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-06-29T11:11:59.734+0000) > > WHY DO PEOPLE THINK IT OK TO TALK ABOUT LAWS IF THEY NOW FUCKING NOTHING ABOUT THEM? > This is not deceptive pricing in any way if you think it is well look up the laws or cases that people have been WAIT THE LINK YOU FUCKING SHOWED IS A CASE but you still acted like this is illegal what? how? > "can't advertise a former price unless it was the going price as of three months ago," I think this is what you think there breaking, it means you can't list EXISTING products as having a price if that was not the price 3 months ago. In the case that was being talked about in the link the stores were selling things on sell but the price they listed as the regular was not the regular price. > > Riot is not breaking it since the pass bundle as not been sold before and since you can't buy everything Individually the value is up to riot to choose, > > > Like nothing here is wrong if you think it is well I guess you can't buy food anywhere without getting mad since the shit they do IS MUCH WORST. > > Also why are you making this now and not the MANY OTHER TIMES riot did this? fanboy lmao good god this multimillion company needs a hero to defend it
> [{quoted}](name=ALLMIGHTYTTT,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=YEE8FH84,comment-id=00030008,timestamp=2019-06-30T20:06:27.949+0000) > > fanboy lmao > good god this multimillion company needs a hero to defend it lol some guy who just wants to HATE SOMETHING FOR NO REASON and lie about it. lying about laws is not good and all that fact this post has so many upvotes show we don't care about anything.
: > [{quoted}](name=boricCentaur1,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=YEE8FH84,comment-id=000f00010000000000010000,timestamp=2019-06-30T14:40:49.615+0000) > > What like what you make no sense. > The fallout thing you actually made up and lied about since NO LAWSUITS HAPPENED and you NOT LINKING ANYTHING is proof you are just lying. All that comes up are people like you not understand how laws work. > > The case you said again you have 0 clue what you're talking about you need to STOP TALKING ABOUT IT SINCE YOU KNOW DID NOT READ ANYTHING ABOUT IT EVER. That thing you quoted means you can't list something as a deal if the original price listed was not the original price THAT IS ALL. Newsflash riot is not doing that. > > Also love that you also completely ignore my examples of places doing stuff like this normally really shows you have no argument. > > Like you would NEVER post anything about this if it was not popular you just want to look SMART by getting upvotes since you said something popular even if it's untrue. > > All you have done is lie and be disingenuous nothing else you give no proof or no real arguments. You lost. Go to the store. Click on the Pass. Don't just look at the thumbnail, click on it and open up its full page. It shows it as being marked down to 1650, when it has never been sold at any other price. So, yes, it is a false discount. Here. The [first](https://www.dualshockers.com/fallout-76-bethesda-business-practice-christmas-sale-atom-shop-players-criticism/) result of a 5 second google search. And, what, you mean "HOW DO YOU BUY FOOD" as your example? There's nothing there worth commenting on. To throw your own words back at you, what proof? Sit down, kid. You've poorly attempted bad faith arguments, repeatedly demonstrated your lack of basic reading comprehension, and made a huge donkey out of yourself. As I've said, there's better things to do with my time than entertaining the poorly attempted trolling and asinine braying of a dullard. Enjoy your day. {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}}
> [{quoted}](name=Corriandr,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=YEE8FH84,comment-id=000f000100000000000100000000,timestamp=2019-06-30T15:10:07.636+0000) > > Go to the store. Click on the Pass. Don't just look at the thumbnail, click on it and open up its full page. It shows it as being marked down to 1650, when it has never been sold at any other price. So, yes, it is a false discount. > > Here. The [first](https://www.dualshockers.com/fallout-76-bethesda-business-practice-christmas-sale-atom-shop-players-criticism/) result of a 5 second google search. > > And, what, you mean "HOW DO YOU BUY FOOD" as your example? There's nothing there worth commenting on. To throw your own words back at you, what proof? > > Sit down, kid. You've poorly attempted bad faith arguments, repeatedly demonstrated your lack of basic reading comprehension, and made a huge donkey out of yourself. As I've said, there's better things to do with my time than entertaining the poorly attempted trolling and asinine braying of a dullard. > > Enjoy your day. > > {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}} Please go back to school since you don't know how to have a argument lying and ignoring points should not be part of one. You don't know what a false discount since you can't read to be a false discount it HAS TO HAVE A PRICE BEFORE the passes don't have that. That is why in the law they use the words FORMER price since there has to be a former price. The link did you show anything about lawsuits like at all it was just people who know nothing about law saying they broke it. So again WHERE IS YOUR PROOF LINK TO SOMETHING THAT SAYS THE LAW FIRM HAS FILED A CLAIM AGAINST BETHESDA since that is what you said. I also that you ignored my proof since you are disingenuous there was MUCH more there and I can see it so idk why you're acting like there was none o wait I do you have no argument so you have to ignore things. Guy stop posting if you know nothing about the topic again you lied,showed no proof, and give no counter points. Like you lost deal with it.
: > [{quoted}](name=boricCentaur1,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=YEE8FH84,comment-id=000f000100000000,timestamp=2019-06-30T14:04:45.721+0000) > > Why do people have to lie about shit and act like they have proof, that fallout 76 thing you said is just a flat out lie like why are you actually lying since NONE OF THAT WAS TRUE and didn't happen. Like show proof since I can't find ANYTHING to support your claims? > > Also you have no clue what FTC v Colgate is like actually o clue I actually think you're trolling that is how bad that is. THE CASE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH FUCKING DISCOUNTS, it has about advertising and that was it, they put ads showing there products doing something they can't do. Like WHAT? one riot has 0 ads about the pass and two the pass does what it say it does soooo this has nothing do with anything here. > > So to summarize you bring up something that never happened or that I can't find, then you being up a case about ADVERTISING IN ADS that has nothing to do with anything. > > Like HOW DO YOU BUY FOOD since what they do is MUCH MUCH WORST. Like go to your local store and you will probably find items like soda saying if you buy a bunch of them you get them at this price and the price is basically the same as them added together. which rioter sucked your dick to make you so obedient to their choices and ways, league sucks as a game and so do their prices
> [{quoted}](name=Godfather Star,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=YEE8FH84,comment-id=000f0001000000000000,timestamp=2019-06-30T14:06:23.785+0000) > > which rioter sucked your dick to make you so obedient to their choices and ways, league sucks as a game and so do their prices LOL you are just hating to hate since you want to feel better about yourself nothing else.
: > [{quoted}](name=boricCentaur1,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=YEE8FH84,comment-id=000f000100000000,timestamp=2019-06-30T14:04:45.721+0000) > > Why do people have to lie about shit and act like they have proof, that fallout 76 thing you said is just a flat out lie like why are you actually lying since NONE OF THAT WAS TRUE and didn't happen. Like show proof since I can't find ANYTHING to support your claims? > > Also you have no clue what FTC v Colgate is like actually o clue I actually think you're trolling that is how bad that is. THE CASE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH FUCKING DISCOUNTS, it has about advertising and that was it, they put ads showing there products doing something they can't do. Like WHAT? one riot has 0 ads about the pass and two the pass does what it say it does soooo this has nothing do with anything here. > > So to summarize you bring up something that never happened or that I can't find, then you being up a case about ADVERTISING IN ADS that has nothing to do with anything. > > Like HOW DO YOU BUY FOOD since what they do is MUCH MUCH WORST. Like go to your local store and you will probably find items like soda saying if you buy a bunch of them you get them at this price and the price is basically the same as them added together. FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 380 U.S. 374, 387 (1965) (“It has long been considered a deceptive practice to state falsely that a product ordinarily sells for an inflated price but that it is being offered at a special reduced price, even if the offered price represents the actual value of the product and the purchaser is receiving his money's worth.”) False discounts are false advertising. Given that when I google "Bethesda christmas store false discounts" I find multiple matches - and not just ones linking to reddit - and you once again have no idea what your talking about in regards to the court ruling - likely you only read the title of it and not the description or actual wording of the ruling - you are once again being a donkey. Sit down and get out of here before you make a further fool of yourself. You're not worth engaging in conversation at all, and i've got better things to do than listen to your braying.
> [{quoted}](name=Corriandr,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=YEE8FH84,comment-id=000f0001000000000001,timestamp=2019-06-30T14:13:19.680+0000) > > FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 380 U.S. 374, 387 (1965) (“It has long been considered a deceptive practice to state falsely that a product ordinarily sells for an inflated price but that it is being offered at a special reduced price, even if the offered price represents the actual value of the product and the purchaser is receiving his money's worth.”) False discounts are false advertising. > > Given that when I google "Bethesda christmas store false discounts" I find multiple matches - and not just ones linking to reddit - and you once again have no idea what your talking about in regards to the court ruling - likely you only read the title of it and not the description or actual wording of the ruling - you are once again being a donkey. > > Sit down and get out of here before you make a further fool of yourself. You're not worth engaging in conversation at all, and i've got better things to do than listen to your braying. What like what you make no sense. The fallout thing you actually made up and lied about since NO LAWSUITS HAPPENED and you NOT LINKING ANYTHING is proof you are just lying. All that comes up are people like you not understand how laws work. The case you said again you have 0 clue what you're talking about you need to STOP TALKING ABOUT IT SINCE YOU KNOW DID NOT READ ANYTHING ABOUT IT EVER. That thing you quoted means you can't list something as a deal if the original price listed was not the original price THAT IS ALL. Newsflash riot is not doing that. Also love that you also completely ignore my examples of places doing stuff like this normally really shows you have no argument. Like you would NEVER post anything about this if it was not popular you just want to look SMART by getting upvotes since you said something popular even if it's untrue. All you have done is lie and be disingenuous nothing else you give no proof or no real arguments. You lost.
Show more

boricCentaur1

Level 155 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion