: Intentionally feeding
The only thing that is bannable in this game is BM. Riot would rather you afk or run it down to relieve stress/vent in game
Seen (NA)
: How long until player like these get punished?
As long as he doesn't say bad words he will never get banned
: I hardly ever am bothered by bm but today it felt personal
If you are this easily intimidated by the enemy team then why did you turn off the all-chat filter. When you make an account it is initially made so that you can't engage in all chat. You manually went in and chose to be able to interact with the enemy team
: 0 respect whoever spamming GGEZ
: When is it BMing or verbal abuse?
Its a video game with both a mute button and an option to turn off all chat. If you considered that interaction offensive then I guess congrats to your first day on the internet
Rioter Comments
: no. lost is where the game says defeat. losing is where you have very slight chances of winning. If there is a .1% chance of winning, where the enemy team literally ints, then yes, im gonna keep playing. worst comes to worse? i lose, oh noooooooooo. i am the type of guy who has a 1-17 bot lane and thinks "thats alright, i can pick up their slack and keep up pressure else where. This is winnable if i keep my head in the game." it sounds like you just give up. or you are a quitter.
> [{quoted}](name=TheSnowyLeopard,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=000400010000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-01-18T18:06:08.926+0000) > > no. lost is where the game says defeat. losing is where you have very slight chances of winning. > > If there is a .1% chance of winning, where the enemy team literally ints, then yes, im gonna keep playing. worst comes to worse? i lose, oh noooooooooo. i am the type of guy who has a 1-17 bot lane and thinks "thats alright, i can pick up their slack and keep up pressure else where. This is winnable if i keep my head in the game." it sounds like you just give up. or you are a quitter. So you have fun playing in games where you are 99.9% sure you are going to lose? To me that is disgusting. You are literally maximizing the time you spend losing like that
: congrats! probably means: a) you are of a higher skill capacity than me. or b) have played more often than me and are actively trying to climb! or c) some other option or combination I have not considered I have played one game of ranked recently and have stopped trying to climb, instead trying to enjoy the game with friends. I am sure that I can climb to Diamond or near there (at least Platinum 2) by the end of season 9 and that is my current goal! I am sure if I played 19 games a week (like you did the past 7 days) in ranked, i would be higher in platinum! Keep it strong my friend.
> [{quoted}](name=TheSnowyLeopard,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=000400010000000000000000000000010000,timestamp=2019-01-18T18:16:49.823+0000) > > congrats! probably means: > > a) you are of a higher skill capacity than me. > or > b) have played more often than me and are actively trying to climb! > or > c) some other option or combination I have not considered > > I have played one game of ranked recently and have stopped trying to climb, instead trying to enjoy the game with friends. I am sure that I can climb to Diamond or near there (at least Platinum 2) by the end of season 9 and that is my current goal! > > I am sure if I played 19 games a week (like you did the past 7 days) in ranked, i would be higher in platinum! Keep it strong my friend. Your account has more games on it than mine
: sorry, you are mis inturpretting the definition of lost, and giving up :) Lost, is when the game is over, aka the nexus explodes. therefore you have lost. giving up, you are losing the game, and therefore dont want to put in the necessary energy to make it a winning game. so no. a game is not LOST as you say, until the game tells you DEFEAT. sorry bud, gonna have to get rid of your mentality of giving up if you want to actually get better.
> [{quoted}](name=TheSnowyLeopard,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=0004000100000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-01-18T17:44:13.482+0000) > > sorry, you are mis inturpretting the definition of lost, and giving up :) > > Lost, is when the game is over, aka the nexus explodes. therefore you have lost. > > giving up, you are losing the game, and therefore dont want to put in the necessary energy to make it a winning game. > > so no. a game is not LOST as you say, until the game tells you DEFEAT. sorry bud, gonna have to get rid of your mentality of giving up if you want to actually get better. We are the same elo despite my mentality. Interesting
rujitra (NA)
: 1. You don't get to decide that. 2. There isn't some sort of "captain" or "mvp" role in League.
> [{quoted}](name=rujitra,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=0004000200000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-01-18T00:08:36.408+0000) > > 1. You don't get to decide that. > > 2. There isn't some sort of "captain" or "mvp" role in League. Thats not true. I can go on op.gg and see how much higher my winrates, KDA, kill participation, damage, etc. is every game
rujitra (NA)
: You are arguing that you should be allowed to leave if your teammates aren't listening to you. They don't get listen to you.
> [{quoted}](name=rujitra,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=00040002000000000000,timestamp=2019-01-17T20:39:08.520+0000) > > You are arguing that you should be allowed to leave if your teammates aren't listening to you. They don't get listen to you. why. I'm better then they are
Khabith (NA)
: Why can't riot make Adc's super meaningful and decently strong throughout all of the game, smh
> [{quoted}](name=Khabith,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=9ru3oPsW,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-01-17T18:49:34.953+0000) > > Why can't riot make Adc's super meaningful and decently strong throughout all of the game, smh Dumb to have a role be strong early, mid, and then be the strongest late. They need to be relevant early and mid, and very strong late
saltran (EUW)
: >on-hit itemization....and a very strong but not OP late game. Ah yeah lategame Kog'Maw or Kai'Sa are specially not OP lategame amirite.
> [{quoted}](name=saltran,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=9ru3oPsW,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-01-17T18:19:22.924+0000) > > Ah yeah lategame Kog'Maw or Kai'Sa are specially not OP lategame amirite. Easy to tone the numbers down so they became less OP late. Unlike crit which has proven to be hard to balance
Rioter Comments
rujitra (NA)
: You aren't the boss of your teammates
> [{quoted}](name=rujitra,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=000400020000,timestamp=2019-01-17T17:36:30.182+0000) > > You aren't the boss of your teammates ?
Xidphel (NA)
: These so-called trolls. Were they literally doing this to piss you off or where they actually trying to win?
> [{quoted}](name=Xidphel,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=000800000000,timestamp=2019-01-17T15:46:34.187+0000) > > These so-called trolls. Were they literally doing this to piss you off or where they actually trying to win? If this was them trying to win then holy shit lmfao
Hotarµ (NA)
: I wouldn't know anything about that since I don't have the replay on hand, but in that situation just report the player for griefing and try to farm up or split push. Even if it looks like a guaranteed loss and your team is toxic, you still committed to the game and you have to see it through to the end. Obviously it sucks and I'd be mad too but AFKing is against the rules, there's never a situation where it's acceptable.
> [{quoted}](name=Hotarµ,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=000300010000,timestamp=2019-01-17T14:58:06.637+0000) > > I wouldn't know anything about that since I don't have the replay on hand, but in that situation just report the player for griefing and try to farm up or split push. Even if it looks like a guaranteed loss and your team is toxic, you still committed to the game and you have to see it through to the end. > > Obviously it sucks and I'd be mad too but AFKing is against the rules, there's never a situation where it's acceptable. Playing badly isn't reportable Riot wouldn't do anything. Which is fine. I'm just venting and wishing that there was something Riot could do for players who felt like they were trapped in dead games.
: Position ranks and split rewards coming to PBE today for 9.2!
Personally really excited for this change. I only play ranked so its cool that I can try to mid lane games out without trolling
Hotarµ (NA)
: I just looked at the match history of the game in question and although nobody on your team performed outrageously well, that game wasn't 100% over and given time your team could have scaled and won the game. Personally I don't mind that some players want to forfeit early, but it's not fair to blame your teammates and call them trolls for wanting to play out a game. What you see as a lost cause, others see as an opportunity for comeback. Edit: Totally forgot to mention that adding a log out function wouldn't do anything in a scenario like this. If the tables were turned and you were fed, someone could just log out and force you into a 4v5.
> [{quoted}](name=Hotarµ,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-01-17T00:50:22.696+0000) > > I just looked at the match history of the game in question and although nobody on your team performed outrageously well, that game wasn't 100% over and given time your team could have scaled and won the game. > > Personally I don't mind that some players want to forfeit early, but it's not fair to blame your teammates and call them trolls for wanting to play out a game. > > What you see as a lost cause, others see as an opportunity for comeback. > > Edit: Totally forgot to mention that adding a log out function wouldn't do anything in a scenario like this. If the tables were turned and you were fed, someone could just log out and force you into a 4v5. If that was true they'd be identifying win conditions. Instead, the ezreal was having fun dying 1 v 1 to a mundo and typing "I don't care" afterwards. If players want to stall out a game in hopes of a comeback that is fine. Identify win conditions and rally, sounds great. None of the players in question did that
PH45 (EUNE)
: Maybe think twice before pushing the play button. If you can't handle a one-sided loss I don't think League is the game for you, as those games **will** happen from time to time to everyone.
> [{quoted}](name=PH45,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=0008,timestamp=2019-01-17T06:03:47.342+0000) > > Maybe think twice before pushing the play button. If you can't handle a one-sided loss I don't think League is the game for you, as those games **will** happen from time to time to everyone. So you enjoy one sided loses? You like to maximize the amount of time you spend losing? Because I prefer winning and like to minimize my time spent in a game that is a clear loss
: there is logging out of a game. it is called exit button. it is located right near surrender. look for it next match.
> [{quoted}](name=Inkling Commando,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-01-17T00:48:48.019+0000) > > there is logging out of a game. it is called exit button. it is located right near surrender. look for it next match. That isn't the same a logging out. Logging out of a program usually brings you right back to a log in screen. How is that similar to what happens when you exit a game
rujitra (NA)
: If you don't want to play a game of League, please do not push the "Play" or "Queue" buttons. If you can't agree to play a **full** game until the Nexus falls, either don't play or take your punishment.
> [{quoted}](name=rujitra,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lkzAavKX,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2019-01-17T01:17:14.363+0000) > > If you don't want to play a game of League, please do not push the "Play" or "Queue" buttons. > > If you can't agree to play a **full** game until the Nexus falls, either don't play or take your punishment. I want to play. But if their jungle is greeding for scuttle that we have warded when she is lvl 2 with 20% hp, and I spam ping to collapse on her, and nobody pings or reacts, then its clear that they didn't sign up to play a competitive game of league. If due to Riots terrible matchmaking, both bot and mid have lost all lane priority 30 seconds into the game, thats fine. But at least fucking ping that you aren't going to be able to move to scuttle. Or type "hey, I'm dogshit. I'll never have lane priority" and I'll play around that.
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=comedybingbongs,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AERshW4o,comment-id=0010,timestamp=2019-01-14T16:23:53.832+0000) > > In my experience, when someone on the enemy team literally starts running it down mid, it makes my team play waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay worse. Probably acting cocky and tunneling to kill the inter
> [{quoted}](name=R107 Games,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AERshW4o,comment-id=00100000,timestamp=2019-01-14T17:42:14.732+0000) > > Probably acting cocky and tunneling to kill the inter Exactly. Which is why you need to let AP champs with the mejais get the kills to make up for the dumber teammates
: If the other team has an actual Intentional Feeder......don't kill the feeder.
In my experience, when someone on the enemy team literally starts running it down mid, it makes my team play waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay worse. Like so bad that the enemy team is ridiculing them in all chat for 35 minutes telling them to uninstall if they aren't good enough to win a 4 v 5. So, to compensate for Riot's OP matchmaking, I always buy a mejais and make sure to be the one to get the kills. I also type in all caps to the AD champs not to take the kills and let the AP champions with a mejais get the kills.
: That actually helps reinforce my point, I think. If the self-checkout machines don't work that well, then that's another downside to taking the approach of trying to cull everything related to the problem instead of focusing on the problem itself. So, rather than singularly firing/despatching the problem cashier, solving the problem in short order, we wind up with several people out of a job because of one person's misbehavior, and others outside of the situation now have to deal with holistically worse conditions because the business decided to do away with all cashier positions, when firing the delinquent cashier would have fixed the problem much cleaner.
> [{quoted}](name=Umbral Regent,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=MNA85yhV,comment-id=000200010000,timestamp=2019-01-09T16:39:15.425+0000) > > That actually helps reinforce my point, I think. If the self-checkout machines don't work that well, then that's another downside to taking the approach of trying to cull everything related to the problem instead of focusing on the problem itself. > > So, rather than singularly firing/despatching the problem cashier, solving the problem in short order, we wind up with several people out of a job because of one person's misbehavior, and others outside of the situation now have to deal with holistically worse conditions because the business decided to do away with all cashier positions, when firing the delinquent cashier would have fixed the problem much cleaner. One would need to make the case that having a chat filter would cause some problems that don't exist currently. Self checkout machines have unique problems that did not exist when it was only human cashiers. Self checkout machines break, piss customers off, are loud, etc. What issues would an automatic chat filter bring that is analogous to our cashier situation?
Scrunny D (EUW)
: Riot needs to remove chat from this game. It's causing teen suicides.
You can set your account to star out curses if you are easily offended. Though I don't understand why Riot doesn't automatically star out phrases that they will ban you for. Like they 100% have the technology to automatically censor out any phrase they want and make it so nobody ever gets a chat ban again. My theory is that they like banning people and want the game to die. So they ban players, they make new accounts, they flame new players, new players uninstall, player growth slows, mission complete EDIT: I had put in aestrics instead of the word "star." Made post unreadable
: I'm gonna be short and to the point about this. > Toxicity is ruining this game and children's lives. > --- > The honor system, reports system everything should just go. chat should be deleted fullstop... This line of thinking is "my thumb hurts because I have a splinter, so I have to amputate my hand". If you say "toxicity is ruining the game", then targeting chat and the behavior systems wholesale instead of focusing on toxicity (which, focusing on toxicity is what Riot is already doing, no less) is pretty much overshooting the target entirely and trying to get rid of everything _related_ to the problem in hopes that you'll take the problem out with it. Imagine if businesses employed that strategy. "Well, we're receiving complaints about one cashier making rude remarks about customers on their way out, so let's just fire everyone who works the registers and set up self-checkout lanes to replace them". It's asinine, and causes more harm than good. Nobody in their right mind would try to solve problems that way.
> [{quoted}](name=Umbral Regent,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=MNA85yhV,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-01-08T22:55:45.996+0000) > > I'm gonna be short and to the point about this. > > This line of thinking is "my thumb hurts because I have a splinter, so I have to amputate my hand". > > If you say "toxicity is ruining the game", then targeting chat and the behavior systems wholesale instead of focusing on toxicity (which, focusing on toxicity is what Riot is already doing, no less) is pretty much overshooting the target entirely and trying to get rid of everything _related_ to the problem in hopes that you'll take the problem out with it. > > Imagine if businesses employed that strategy. "Well, we're receiving complaints about one cashier making rude remarks about customers on their way out, so let's just fire everyone who works the registers and set up self-checkout lanes to replace them". It's asinine, and causes more harm than good. Nobody in their right mind would try to solve problems that way. That is a good idea except for the fact that self checkout machines don't work that well
: It would be really nice if Riot actually punished Inting/trolling in ranked
They take is a lot more seriously if you send in a ticket and take screenshots of them admitting to inting in the post game lobby. I've been sending in lots of tickets lately and its been working. This one guy had an account with 2K games on it last season and soft intd me. No way the system would pick it up. So I sent in a ticket with screenshots and a detailed explanation of his actions. Curiously enough he hasn't played any games in the past week ;)
Rioter Comments
: I do know that but it doesn't concern me because i get explosive when i engage either way but i usually do build zeal right after for more. But the problem isn't me just check the kill count and assists i get and how many turrets i blow up. The problem is that my team is litteraly feeding and won't push and most times they afk. If my team would stop afking then maybe i would win the game
> [{quoted}](name= kababtaleIL,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=QYRQmgjO,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2018-12-26T23:09:11.015+0000) > > I do know that but it doesn't concern me because i get explosive when i engage either way but i usually do build zeal right after for more. But the problem isn't me just check the kill count and assists i get and how many turrets i blow up. The problem is that my team is litteraly feeding and won't push and most times they afk. If my team would stop afking then maybe i would win the game I know how you feel. But the fact is that if I played on your account with the same teammates I'd be winning 90% of those games. If you play well, and don't tilt / flame your teammates, you will climb. Simple. (If you are smurfing you can still flame your teammates and climb) I also see you have won 7 of your last 12 games. If you keep doing that you will climb pretty quickly. AND PLEASE fix your build. If you want to play full damage sion build lethality. The items are cheaper and go better with his kit
: Why does this happen?
Next time this happens, dodge. You save 20 minutes, 17 LP, your MMR, and your sanity.
: I wish I could tell you the game improves as you Rank up, but sadly I can't. I've been as high as S2-S1 and the skill of the teams still seem to be random. Even Gold players who have been in my game seem to lack the basic understanding of how to win a game. Since solo carrying has been reduced, the games now force you to play with and rely on your teammates more than previous seasons in this game. It's highly disturbing.
> [{quoted}](name=FixThisBSGame,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=QYRQmgjO,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-12-26T06:22:52.876+0000) > > I wish I could tell you the game improves as you Rank up, but sadly I can't. I've been as high as S2-S1 and the skill of the teams still seem to be random. Even Gold players who have been in my game seem to lack the basic understanding of how to win a game. Since solo carrying has been reduced, the games now force you to play with and rely on your teammates more than previous seasons in this game. It's highly disturbing. The frequency of people legit going afk certainly goes down as you rank up
: Ranked is so frustrating
Learning how to read will help. Every single game you build IE before your zeal item. IE gives you AD, doubles your crit chance, and converts some crit damage into true damage. If you have 0% crit, then you are doubling that to still 0, and converting some of that damage to 0 true damage. On top of that, if you want to play AD sion you should be building him full lethality
: "Easy"/"ez" at the end of a match should be a zero-tolerance phrase
I would suggest full muting every game if comments like that are capable of tilting you. Lots of people play online games to joke around and have fun
: Banned after a single game??
14 days for this???? LOL that is wild
: Let us revise who we give honor to
Play better and you wont get called that. Alternatively you can leave the post game lobby to avoid being offended by online video game banter
: later wuk hae fun u literally just lost us the game kys i mean good job gj wuk ur really good at this game Yeah, you totally said 'gj' and 'ur really good at this game' in a totally serious, not sarcastic in the least, way .. especially given all the other chat you're not showing. We have a zero tolerance policy about telling people to kill themselves, so you claim it's something else. You were harassing people, so they are all jokes. You sarcastically say 'good job' to people who are doing poorly, so you were doing it sincerely. You paste small, composed, screenshots and selective snippets of chat. You are completely ignoring the other game given in your reform card. The bottom line here is you were given numerous warnings, more than you should have IMHO. You were told the next penalty would be a perma-ban. You continued this behavior. You got banned. Player support already looked into this, review it, found the penalty to be appropriate, and said the penalty will stand. I looked into this, reviewed it, and find that you have been dishonest in your presentation of this and are deserving of your penalty. Please, feel free to post your chat logs in their ENTIRETY if you'd like to get other peoples' opinions of this.
> [{quoted}](name=Riot Tantram,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=xfl0teU4,comment-id=0014000200000000000100000000,timestamp=2018-10-09T23:31:27.992+0000) > > later > wuk > hae fun > u literally just lost us the game > kys > i mean good job > gj wuk > ur really good at this game > > Yeah, you totally said 'gj' and 'ur really good at this game' in a totally serious, not sarcastic in the least, way .. especially given all the other chat you're not showing. > > We have a zero tolerance policy about telling people to kill themselves, so you claim it's something else. You were harassing people, so they are all jokes. You sarcastically say 'good job' to people who are doing poorly, so you were doing it sincerely. You paste small, composed, screenshots and selective snippets of chat. You are completely ignoring the other game given in your reform card. > > The bottom line here is you were given numerous warnings, more than you should have IMHO. > You were told the next penalty would be a perma-ban. > You continued this behavior. > You got banned. > > Player support already looked into this, review it, found the penalty to be appropriate, and said the penalty will stand. > I looked into this, reviewed it, and find that you have been dishonest in your presentation of this and are deserving of your penalty. > > Please, feel free to post your chat logs in their ENTIRETY if you'd like to get other peoples' opinions of this. lol banned for banter in a video game feelsbadman
Pika Fox (NA)
: Winrate isnt a valid argument. Back in the day riot intentionally nerfed eve to the point where she was practically incapable of being played well. People were literally reported just for picking her. Mains still played her, even though her winrate was garbage, because it was who they liked. Playing something with a low winrate isnt a banable offense.
> [{quoted}](name=Pika Fox,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AYMAc6aE,comment-id=000a000000000000000000010000000100000000000000000000,timestamp=2018-10-09T18:52:54.226+0000) > > Winrate isnt a valid argument. Back in the day riot intentionally nerfed eve to the point where she was practically incapable of being played well. People were literally reported just for picking her. Mains still played her, even though her winrate was garbage, because it was who they liked. > > Playing something with a low winrate isnt a banable offense. So a 1% winrate disco nunu is OK then
Pika Fox (NA)
: One is straight up attempting to lose (inting sion doesnt int, and it wouldnt work mid), the other can work (anyone can jungle) and isnt straight up attempting to lose.
> [{quoted}](name=Pika Fox,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AYMAc6aE,comment-id=000a0000000000000000000100000001000000000000,timestamp=2018-10-09T16:08:36.757+0000) > > One is straight up attempting to lose (inting sion doesnt int, and it wouldnt work mid), the other can work (anyone can jungle) and isnt straight up attempting to lose. What is the winrate on yasuo jg or kallista jg? Is it that much higher than the winrate on disco nunu?
Pika Fox (NA)
: Not an argument. Straight inting down mid is not the same as yas jungle, and you know this.
> [{quoted}](name=Pika Fox,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AYMAc6aE,comment-id=000a00000000000000000001000000010000,timestamp=2018-10-09T13:47:07.275+0000) > > Not an argument. Straight inting down mid is not the same as yas jungle, and you know this. Why is it different
ExpStealer (EUNE)
: Then I just wonder how far he's gonna go. I'm betting it's not even his actual account in this case and he has done the same thing at least once before since he's trying to find loopholes in the rules/context to justify it.
> [{quoted}](name=ExpStealer,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AYMAc6aE,comment-id=000a0000000000010000000000010000,timestamp=2018-10-08T20:07:16.710+0000) > > Then I just wonder how far he's gonna go. I'm betting it's not even his actual account in this case and he has done the same thing at least once before since he's trying to find loopholes in the rules/context to justify it. I'm not saying all that. I'm just saying that he doesn't even play ranked. Who gives a fuck what he thinks
Pika Fox (NA)
: No one cares if they want yas jungle or not, theyre gunna get it. Its not their pick.
> [{quoted}](name=Pika Fox,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AYMAc6aE,comment-id=000a000000000000000000010000,timestamp=2018-10-08T23:35:14.731+0000) > > No one cares if they want yas jungle or not, theyre gunna get it. Its not their pick. By that logic I can pick ghost cleanse nunu mid and run it down mid. Its my pick. My teammates have no say on what I pick or on my gameplay strategy
ExpStealer (EUNE)
: Wait, are you telling me my team got Kalista jungle as a *direct result* of me banning that guys's Yasuo?
> [{quoted}](name=ExpStealer,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AYMAc6aE,comment-id=000a00000000000100000000,timestamp=2018-10-08T18:36:30.440+0000) > > Wait, are you telling me my team got Kalista jungle as a *direct result* of me banning that guys's Yasuo? Dude. You are arguing with someone who literally doesn't play this game. He is just trolling you. Look at his match history. He literally only plays bots, and the one recent normal game he has he went AP tristana. You might as well get an opinion from someone who plays chess online
Ayzev (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Pika Fox,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AYMAc6aE,comment-id=000a00010000,timestamp=2018-10-08T18:04:41.217+0000) > > If someone wants to vayne support and CS, they can. Its not gunna go well, but they can. This begs the question - at what point does something go from off-meta to breaking rules? Couldn't even running straight into the enemy turret to hit it as soon and as often as possible be excused as just trying to push very fast?
> [{quoted}](name=Ayzev,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AYMAc6aE,comment-id=000a000100000001,timestamp=2018-10-08T19:00:21.937+0000) > > This begs the question - at what point does something go from off-meta to breaking rules? > Couldn't even running straight into the enemy turret to hit it as soon and as often as possible be excused as just trying to push very fast? These people will say yes lmfao
Pika Fox (NA)
: Summoner code, which is the rulebook riot goes by, boils down to essentially "dont be a dick". Intentionally banning someone else's pick violates this.
> [{quoted}](name=Pika Fox,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AYMAc6aE,comment-id=000a0000000000000000,timestamp=2018-10-08T18:03:34.507+0000) > > Summoner code, which is the rulebook riot goes by, boils down to essentially "dont be a dick". Intentionally banning someone else's pick violates this. But picking Yasuo jungle doesn't violate the "don't be a dick rule." If someone is troll picking, by banning that pick you are actually helping out the 3 other innocent members of your team that obviously don't want someone playing fucking Yasuo jungle
Pika Fox (NA)
: As far as i can tell, they didnt troll. They picked a subpar champ but played the game. You intentionally geiefed your team, however, and openly admitted doing so, stating you intentionally banned their pick, and telling them "*I* dont want a yasuo jungle". Its not YOUR pick, its theirs. You dont get to tell your team what they can and cant play.
> [{quoted}](name=Pika Fox,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AYMAc6aE,comment-id=000a,timestamp=2018-10-08T17:42:17.826+0000) > > As far as i can tell, they didnt troll. They picked a subpar champ but played the game. > > You intentionally geiefed your team, however, and openly admitted doing so, stating you intentionally banned their pick, and telling them "*I* dont want a yasuo jungle". Its not YOUR pick, its theirs. You dont get to tell your team what they can and cant play. lol. By that logic picking vayne as a support and taking all the cs isn't toxic, but your team telling you to uninstall would be. NA IQ right here
ExpStealer (EUNE)
: I should have, but I thought they'd just pick that to mock us and showing that they can win with any champ in jungler role. Oh, well... :/
> [{quoted}](name=ExpStealer,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=AYMAc6aE,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2018-10-08T16:39:00.516+0000) > > I should have, but I thought they'd just pick that to mock us and showing that they can win with any champ in jungler role. Oh, well... :/ I mean you can always op.gg someone just to see if, on the off chance, they are smurfing. But most of the time tho they are a playing 4fun and will int you
: "You have no reason to report me"
You did the right thing banning yasuo. Once you saw him pick kalista, you should of dodged though. No point auto-losing your LP like that. Don't listen to comet Bard (lol) players
: Hey there Compulsory, it looks like this issue was taken care of by one of our support agents. I just wanted to follow up and make sure it's all good now!
> [{quoted}](name=Digital Ram,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=fqi7bmbE,comment-id=000c,timestamp=2018-10-08T16:09:20.712+0000) > > Hey there Compulsory, it looks like this issue was taken care of by one of our support agents. I just wanted to follow up and make sure it's all good now! LOL. Making Inting unpunishable. I love Riot games
Show more

comedybingbongs

Level 47 (NA)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion