> [{quoted}](name=Cavalier707,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=4zP746y7,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2019-03-20T22:23:37.759+0000) > > Last time in "your shop" I had a bug and it didn't work. I sent a ticket and they told me they will give me these skins for the reduced price manually if I'd like to get any of them. Riot are actually good, but most of players only see downsides. well that's cause the down sides tend to be the balance team which by effect are the most visible to us

> [{quoted}](name=Automated Riven,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=50aB6GbJ,comment-id=00150000,timestamp=2019-03-19T00:50:11.497+0000) > > Then drive and pick it up. Gas is less then the delivery charge. > > And if you can't afford to tip then don't order delivery. I don't give a damn who you are. The OP doesn't owe you the use of his vehicle for free. Or his time. I don't OWE him a tip either. Like I said sometimes I wouldn't tip in most cases...however depending on the driver I learned that when you have a good rep for tipping at least 5-10 bucks on larger orders your food gets delivered to you 1st generally. The only reason to tip the pizza people is cause A. you like them or B. you want faster service when the food is ready. Drivers talk to each other about who does and doesn't tip well and prioritizes based off of that. In some cases where I'd demand my food be delivered asap (oh we accidentally delivered it to the wrong house and they didn't want it bullshit) I'd look at the ticket the driver had for my order and decide if they got a tip purely based off of that. Deliver my 70 dollar plus pizza order which the manager said one of the most expensive pizza prices was going to be removed from the price and let me find out it was simply cause YOU didn't know where you were going? Fuck your tip. (Managers will generally send back the employee who fucked something like that up to fix the mess and will even say hard hints like "we will send that driver back out your way with the order")

> [{quoted}](name=How Do You Meta,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=50aB6GbJ,comment-id=0009,timestamp=2019-03-18T02:44:03.751+0000) > > I agree with other posters, greedy business owners should just pay minimum wage at the minimum instead of having people tip. Tipping ruins the service industry both for the employees and the customers, and the owners are the ones that only benefit from it. The employees have to rely on tips and are really upset and nervous about being tipped while the customers feel uncomfortable with thinking what to tip the employees. The owners get to pocket those extra savings and call it a day. > > In other countries besides United States, tipping is not only discouraged but also can be illegal because the service industry gets paid a livable wage. In fact we used to not tip either and it was considered vulgar to tip someone but then somewhere along the lines the restaurant industry decided to shift it into a tip based job (I don't remember why). If other countries and United States (in the past) could pay servers a reasonable wage without tipping, then we should go back to it. > > I'll still tip when I can, but I won't follow a 15% rule. I tip based on the service. If you do a good job, I'll tip a good 15-20%. If you cut my hair and do a great job, you get a 50% tip. Other services that require some skill other than food usually get ~30% tip. I don't tip delivery drivers much (sorry op) and maybe it's 10ish%. I tip maybe max 5% if I'm picking up food. If you do a poor job like delivery my food cold, make me wait in a restaurant for 3 hours for my food (this has happened!), are rude, or anything else that really ruins my experience, then I won't tip. I'm not going to tip out of obligation because there isn't enough money coming into your paychecks if you do a terrible job. That's not how it should work. If you are in the service industry, you are expected to perform a decent service and I'll pay extra accordingly. > > Oh and PS as this actually happened before: > If you come after me and say I didn't tip the 15% or something like that, I will take back the tip, make a scene, tell everyone I know not to support the establishment, and I will leave scathing reviews on yelp and other sites to make sure no one has to go through that. There was this one time at an event where the group paid $30 in tips and the manager came at us and said we didn't tip $35 and our bill won't be considered paid. The guy who was serving us kept messing up our orders constantly and gave a person who specifically said "NO SEAFOOD IM ALLERGIC" a plate of scallops. In some places I go they try to force you to pay the 15% tip as a "service fee" which we outright would refuse to do. It was only listed AFTER the recite was made. If we got shitty service you could literally end up with us paying for our food and walking out the door (Since the "fee" was a hidden price). On the flip side sometimes we take mercy and even for a waiter tip 50% of our bill. One note-able time this happened we had a waiter who was running around a tad stressed...even though restaurant was basically empty save for 2 other groups of 10...which turns out he was serving on his own while the other waiters were doing nothing (literally just standing around talking). He got a 50% tip from us for not being a lazy shit bag and trying to make sure everything was correct on our orders.

I knew someone who worked at a pizza place here and their delivery fee was actually just a forced tip for the driver so we didn't tip unless it got here fast...or being honest if the delivery girl was cute not gonna lie about that one.

It sounds so much like a COD menu thing...I posted about it a long time ago. similar to one of the BLACK OPS series I think.

In norms especially yes. Even higher odds if you pissed off a 4 pre-made on your team.

Is shyv running conq now...? If she is that might be what's going on there.

> [{quoted}](name=Moody P,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=qXgk4iUt,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-03-16T15:25:40.825+0000) > > the reality is that Akali is a better rework than nunu and was actually too good for daring to be a champion with unique strengths in a game that punishes you for having them > > people like Warwick and Nunu because they can play against them the exact same way as anyone else (and because they aren't being visibly "outplayed") and not for any real argument of quality This is incorrect. New akali is nothing like the old one. When a "rework" happens it'd be nice if in some sense the champion's play style was preserved. New swain still has a passive that can trigger on pulling a CC'ed enemy, mana restore on an ability, a new tool (W) for people to learn how to play around, the snare got moved to a new skillshot fashion on the E that added an intresting level of skill to it, and still has his "drain tank" identity with his ult. The only thing new akali has the old one did from what I have seen is more or less her shroud which they decided to add on a toxic mechanic onto it.

haha I recall season 3 or 4 I was playing nasus vs full AD team and went for a 3v3 tower dive...Tanked enemy team under tower for over 30 seconds...turns out my teammates didn't help me and I said "Wtf guys? I was tanking all that" "Sorry didn't know you were that tanky"

uh malza off the top of my head depending on how loosely you want to use the term projectile. Ori is another one I can think of but I'm sure of how her ball interacts with windwall. Xerath can fit in this category too.

You are missing the point completely. Singed got hotfixed for a 54% winrate. Riven has been sitting for higher for longer and is still not mentioned anywhere in even official patch notes.

Oh there is no ignoring you see I have mained all solo roles at some point or another. I do agree with the later points. But the fact the video was made in the 1st place and may people are saying that the exp nerf is a bit much and using this video to push that point is fine. Honestly the exp nerf hits jungle harder for farming junglers than it does ganking junglers whos job was to snowball the early game. Now they've made that issue worse.

Jokes can have a point just as tales made fun can still have a lesson behind them.

I personally do not consider this a direct rank shame rather than making a general statement of "do not let bad players tell you what to do in this case". I have seen late game kayle in a few videos...shit is nuts from what I saw.

he's known as mister X if you're curious and not aware.

more like honor her for good sportsmanship

I ain't got plans to come back to league but it's good to see they ain't gonna stick yall with this bullshit for the next year

No shit...from what I've seen kayle gets like nothing.

Ok honestly...hmmm kata def kata. The insta gib threat was real.

From what I understood kayle is generally MEANT to be overzealous even in old lore. I suppose in a sense you could say she is the sword of justice and from my knowledge morgana would be law? Locking people up or something like that making them suffer for what they've done.

...Not trying to sound rude or anything but...when the hell was pen done THAT way...I can't seem to recall.

He has a stun and gap closer on his kit while building AP I'm fairly sure it missing the stun isn't worthless.

...don't people consider korea the highest skilled region? At one point I believe hash brought up a good argument of them deciding toplane was fine around one of the lowest skilled regions I believe. If they are balancing around highest skill then logically using stats from the highest skill region is the correct choice.

I want to see the BALANCE team do it actually. Not the rest of riot. Just the balance team. It would show us just how well they do or do not know the game.

Teemo is actually apparently getting some sort of damage buffs possibly next patch according to PBE.

That to my knowledge is a no, however by contract riot is likely allowed to enforce punishments for anything however they see fit.

Perhaps it's morgana's nature? I mean they're pros and know how to dodge a skillshot I'd hope, but you can't exactly dodge a braum auto. I'm gonna assume they had a tactical reason behind that. They react far faster than most people so to them morgana's long ass snare animation warning and the projectile itself was probably a low tier threat.

> [{quoted}](name=Hethalean,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=pT6YN5mB,comment-id=00010001,timestamp=2019-02-26T16:03:15.648+0000) > > well, the game is showing it's age lately. you can replace the tires on a car with a billion miles on it, but something else will break because you replaced the tires. > > Riot can hotfix it... but will their 'fix' actually fix the problem. From what I've seen out of their capabilities, what will they break with the fix? They haven't really fixed anything lately that doesn't break something else at the same time. Yes that's why league needs to make the game from the ground up code wise again now that they have more resources to pour into coding. Weak foundations cause weak walls and roofs.

The only reason he'd apologize for that remark would likely be to try and cover himself from any heat the bosses are giving him. Nothing more nothing less. People don't say "sorry" like that when their opinion is basically set in stone with most of/if not all the facts that they know of the place. He just wishes for this mess to go away quickly before he ends up being next to get cut off.

> [{quoted}](name=ZephyrDrake,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=lLoNj0AX,comment-id=00070000,timestamp=2019-02-23T02:38:06.693+0000) > > yeah because boards also want balance... except that most people here are more than happy to leave champions, if not entire classes, be completely unviable just because they don't like them I do get what your saying. Honestly I do agree that some champions should be left in the gutter, not because of being unliked, but due to the nature of their kits (no one likes yasuo...at all hardly, but god kassadin takes the cake for me in most cases). I could understand if it was the simple general triangle of tanks hating DPS, DPS hating assassins, assassins hating tanks, but it's not just that any more. Literally damage (and mobility) across the board is too high and that's where a lot of the balance problems stem from at present. People REFUSE to comprehend this and riot just keeps making it worse by adding more damage every patch.

I demand a fucking response as well. Banning 5 support champs can be a legit tactic in the sense that you are going to basically shoehorn bot to play to a certain style.

> [{quoted}](name=GreenKnight,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=7YzwQVP1,comment-id=000000010000,timestamp=2019-02-21T20:04:13.882+0000) > > They are responsive, it's one of the first thing that garners their attention. But, some people will buy those skins simply because of their rarity. And companies target those, as Take Two CEO's said, "whales" that will buy everything gaming company releases. This is correct. As an example say the chroma took 600 dollars worth of resources (paying for work and the actual means to do so included). If 6 people out of "millions" buy it you broke even. Any one else AFTER is a profit. Doesn't matter how much profit is just that to company profit.

I think some people are trying to say the system doesn't try to screw you into a 50% winrate by giving you inters ect. Allow me to just say that you are wrong. Typically the higher and faster you climb the more and more it will try to drop a hammer.

> [{quoted}](name=Axzarious,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=gUHTjB25,comment-id=0008,timestamp=2019-02-06T22:01:42.208+0000) > > I think it's actually impossible for RIOT to update the Death Recap. From what I remember hearing earlier, it's because that the recap is embedded in some core part of the game that makes changes nearly impossible because of what I can only assume is spaghetti code. If they change something in it, it's liable to break hundreds of other things and cause some serious bugs in things you'd never reasonably expect, so they just decided to leave it as is. Then perhaps they should re-do the core code...with far more resources at their disposal it should be easier and arguably might help make the game run smoother.

> [{quoted}](name=rujitra,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=siENkTGa,comment-id=000b000100010000000100000000,timestamp=2019-02-03T00:08:44.315+0000) > > That's fine on gameplay. The plus board is for people who don't have time to sift through 100 useless or repetitive posts just to see analysis. > > Repeating patch notes and stating things as facts that aren't facts isn't analysis. Saying farming junglers got nerfed while ganking junglers got buffed is a fact. Fairly simple flow chart would be Nerfing farming means more ganking which means junglers who can gank well and not worry much about farm is a buff to gankers and a nerf to farmers. Fact is ganking junglers got BUFFED.

> [{quoted}](name=CallMeBoomer,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=siENkTGa,comment-id=000b0001,timestamp=2019-02-02T19:47:49.258+0000) > > You honestly cherry picked and left out all of the stats/data the OP had. > > This is why people avoid the boards and use reddit more so these days. Addressing him in particular won't help ya lad...he's generally a mod that ain't willing to even slightly change his mind on hardly anything.

> [{quoted}](name=boo910,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=siENkTGa,comment-id=000500000000000100000000,timestamp=2019-02-02T16:02:23.196+0000) > > at that point you're talking semantics, because you understood the point he was trying to make. your statement didn't actually contribute anything of substance. it only pointed out a mistake in wording. and regardless of his word choice, his conclusion was sound. I'm going to address you instead of him on this, but...if something is incentivized more now due to a change doesn't that mean that action was effectively in some way, shape, or form buffed? That's the logic I'd use there.

> [{quoted}](name=Periscope,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=siENkTGa,comment-id=000500000000,timestamp=2019-02-01T23:47:09.918+0000) > > Talked with the moderator who removed that post. > > To your OP. It was not removed for that one comment. Overall, it just was not a stellar G+ post. While I do appreciate the math behind the jungle nerfs you provided, I don't feel like that should be the majority of the post. > ---------------- > Further points of improvement: > -I understand that G+ is for the really deep gameplay thinkers. I do think some context to your post would help. If you're going to relate/cite a post from a Rioter, it may be helpful to link that post at some point. > > -The Jungle nerfs are present in your post, as is a single conclusion- it's gonna cause more ganks. I think that's maybe too broad of a conclusion. I'd suggest expounding on playstyles and/or strategies; hits to champs (buff/nerfs), in particular how this may affect champions in the extremes (S tier jungles versus D tier jungles). He doesn't really need context...they nerfed farming junglers more which means by logic that you're going to just see far more ganks. You REALLY don't need context to understand that's going to end up being the ONLY way this shit plays out. I dunno how long you or most other people have played this game...or played top/jung as a main role for as LONG as I have and I can say safely he was COMPLETELY correct to say this only serves to BUFF GANKING and not reduce it.

Nothing in that post was an "Attack". I'm very sad that someone viewed it at such.

> [{quoted}](name=TwitchInMyPants,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=xvxuj3k4,comment-id=0008,timestamp=2019-02-01T14:22:04.640+0000) > > What I'm getting from a lot of those who don't agree with OP - 0 people should be banned for toxicity and people need a thicker skin. I think there might be some bias coming from toxic people in here > > https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1061/1924/products/Thinking_Face_Emoji_grande.png?v=1480481060 I wouldn't quite say bias. I'm not really toxic, but I do think people need thicker skin...IRL and in-game in most cases.

I'm gonna wait and see what the nerf does and see if it ACTUALLY changes anything. If I'm being honest I don't expect it to do much at all. This is a non-biased opinion.

> [{quoted}](name=ı Sona ı,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=4VEouhG7,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2019-02-01T07:21:41.350+0000) > > The anti-hack crasher has crashed me several times this week and twice as much as that over a month so honestly I've not much faith in it, especially how there was such a wide spread of crashes caused by the anti-hack https://twitter.com/RiotSupport/status/1083165854592692224 a bit ago and the error was clearly on Riot's side. > > What i'm getting at is that i'm highly suspect of their current fairness in gathering data when the system is flagging everything and nothing left and right. > > Send a ticket, share your match history, point out your questionable rank and lack of wins, ask them how you could be considered cheating if you aren't winning consistently, etc. They won't answer "how you're cheating". They'll literally just more or less say "get banned scrub gg"

"share in my torment" is one of her quotes right? I mean what if when she was CC'ed or something she had a passive trigger that made her start doing more AOE damage or something? Make it interact with black shield in a way that if the target of black shield was hit by some form of CC the passive would still trigger.

> [{quoted}](name=Glaricion,realm=NA,application-id=Ir7ZrJjF,discussion-id=0bQeiiG4,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-01-31T05:37:15.712+0000) > > Reminder: Don't kill Yasuo after the 7th time and be sure to draft Kindred and champions with knockbacks whenever both teams XXXX up their ban phase and let this _thing_ through. ...kindred? why kindred exactly?

I actually recall once back in season 3/4 I was playing old GP and basically literally did everything and I mean EVERYTHING I could have done to win the game but it was simply too heavy and the enemy team had the guts to say "what could you have done to win the game?" Like ya sure ignore my extremely high CS when I was in lane...ignore the fact I killed top multiple times and used my ult to try and help bot during fights. Ignore the fact that mid lane fed out the ass to a zed the entire time. I don't think it's wrong to say "think on how to fix your mistakes" but to go that far when someone did that damn well was disgusting.

> [{quoted}](name=AIQ,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=RPJVNA9t,comment-id=0002000000000000000000000000000000010002000000020000,timestamp=2019-01-30T14:48:34.456+0000) > > Score 12/17. You were on fire I'm surprised you got WW, he's one of the harder ones, even mains don't really know that line. > > I have an answer sheet sent to iamthegoatofwar, all you should have to do is hover over to see all the champions inline. > Nice job! To be fair it can be difficult for some to understand what warwick says. His VO is very deep and somewhat un-clear to me and I used to main him pre and post rework.

> [{quoted}](name=The Djinn,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=RPJVNA9t,comment-id=000200000000000000000000000000020000,timestamp=2019-01-29T22:53:20.759+0000) > > I think you underestimate the number of actions that occur, and the ratio of proper actions to improper ones. People who understand why they got the action they did rarely post on the boards about it, after all, so what we see tends to be a cross-section of those who are either angry or confused -- sometimes justifiably (like this case) and sometimes unjustifiably. > > There are a *lot* of actions, and the mistakes that I do find tend to be fairly minor for the most part -- take this example, which was a removal and no punishment issued. If there's someone who is reliably making mistakes or semi-reliably making large mistakes, we'll address it. Sure...tell that story again when you talk to ulu.

> [{quoted}](name=AIQ,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=RPJVNA9t,comment-id=0002000000000000000000000000000000010002000000000000,timestamp=2019-01-29T21:10:02.105+0000) > > Hopefully, I don't spoil it for others by messing this up. > Edit: Holy carp it worked So the ones I made guesses on I guessed correctly. Feels good.

> [{quoted}](name=AIQ,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=RPJVNA9t,comment-id=00020000000000000000000000000000000100020000,timestamp=2019-01-29T20:02:29.800+0000) > > NO CHEATING!!! I did these from memory. So they may be slightly off. Still you should be able to tell the champion. Some will be easy some a bit harder. > > 1. Agony, ecstasy, peace, every passing has a beauty all it's own. > 2. On wings of fury. > 3. You are a malodorous offense to my pallet. > 4. I do so enjoy explaining myself to idiots. > 5. I provide catharsis for both my clients and my victims. > 6. March, March, march, march. > 7. Drag them down! > 8. There's this illusion of the reality, but it's not really really real, like it's beside and inside and inside and beside, but never on top... Nevermind, just kidding, but not really.. > (I might have wrote that one wrong. Should be easy though.) > 9. Violence can be death. Or a way of life. > 10. They need wisdom, they don't need teeth. > 11. That was not.. the plan. > 12. Recognizing one's innate superiority can HARDLY be called going rouge. > 13. Disgusting! > 14. And they said I lack balance. HA! > 15. You shout and throw Machetes...? How quaint. > 16. The sun.... this sun? Oh darling. > 17. Okay. 1. Karthus. 2.Sounds like a shyvana quote. 3. sounds llike kench. 4. 5.Jhin. 6.Shaco 7.Naut I believe. Only other one that I could see having/sharing that is pyke. 8.Zoe 9. 10. 11. Kayn...I know it's him but I can not recall if that's a SA form exclusive. 12. 13.Kench says this If I recall. 14.syndra 15. Jhin. 16. 17.Rammus. Fill in the blanks if you like. Though I'm sure i can hit people with many more that I know off the top of my head. For default quotes anyway. EDIT Djinn if you're still watching this post something is very off with the way this comment is behaving. Might wanna ask wuks if he knows anything about it.

> [{quoted}](name=rujitra,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=RPJVNA9t,comment-id=000200000000000000000000000000000001,timestamp=2019-01-29T19:11:58.710+0000) > > You know, I guarantee you I could put a few quotes below, ask you to respond within 60 seconds (which you can’t because this isn’t realtime communication), and you’d not pass the test. > > Find me one person that knows even 15% of League quotes by heart. Typically to know them "by heart" might not be realistic, but in most cases (especially one with the champion's name involved) I would expect them to at least go "that sounds familiar" and look it up.