Rioter Comments
: ***Tracking Trousers*** * +8% movement speed * +10% Tenacity * +450 HP * Active: Gain *True Sight* of the nearest enemy unit in a 2000 Unit range for 5 seconds (60 second CD)
You must mean TRACKY DAKS
Junkο (EUNE)
: Not really. You have champions like Corki with pretty big mana costs. Most champions can use an entire rotation of spells at 100 mana, Corki can only use Q or W and he is out.
that's completely not what I was talking about but sure change the subject ahahaha
: > [{quoted}](name=Wumachine,realm=OCE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=XVYsYTYT,comment-id=0041000000000000,timestamp=2017-07-10T13:25:33.955+0000) > > where did you mention people who declare a role? I shouldn't have to explicitly mention that when you banned someone elses champion **intentionally** that they declared that champion in the first place, because I assumed, most people aren't fucking retarded.
: > [{quoted}](name=Wumachine,realm=OCE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=XVYsYTYT,comment-id=00410000,timestamp=2017-07-10T13:12:16.708+0000) > > pls go into a ranked game for me and tell me what the first 10 seconds of champion select is for... If you're going to have a snide comment and downvote me, at least demonstrate some level of intelligence by realizing that my comment was about **banning their champion on purpose** and since if they didn't declare a champion, you can't *intentionally* ban their champion.
where did you mention people who declare a role?
Zelorxon (EUW)
: I don't understand what you're talking about, i still have to find any trace of skill in plat yet. Plat is nothing but bronzetards that stopped picking teemo and int from lv1, usually they wait 10-15 minutes to start inting because their jungler doesn't want to gank them. (not counting the yasuo/riven players that start inting as soon as first blood gets taken by anybody else besides them.) Who knows tho, if plat could actually put all the effort they make into circlejerking themselves into deluding themselves that they're not dogshit elo they could actually get to diamond. But even there they would still be garbage.
massive generalization taken from personal anecdotal evidence
Junkο (EUNE)
: I meant number my bad.
it does though most ults cost around 100 mana, and 100 mana is only 20% of 500 total mana, despite 20% sounding like a big number
: Bahahahahahahaa "Just because I banned your champ on purpose without communicating with you doesn't give you the right to be toxic duuude." Oh please. People who ban other people's champions can fuck right off. If you have such a good reason to ban the champ then communicate it to the person first. If you ban it without doing so then you're a dickhead and they have every right to be pissed at you.
pls go into a ranked game for me and tell me what the first 10 seconds of champion select is for...
Rioter Comments
: Autofill has actually increased que times.
What these nerds don't understand is that if you play autofill one game you're autofill protected for the next game, why waste 10-20 minutes queueing and dodging instead of just playing a 30 minute support game and guaranteeing your role in the next game.
Verdade (EUNE)
: 550 range "shortest" Meanwhile Sivir, Quinn, Lucian and Graves
Can you not read when I said ONE OF you nerd, read before you criticize.
: So lemme get this straight about Vayne
She's also one of the shortest range adc's that has shit all for damage early game and get's absolutely DICKED on by cait and lucian you bronzie
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: Make a champion disgustingly OP without changing their ratios/base numbers
Otter36 (EUW)
{{champion:136}} {{champion:136}} {{champion:136}} {{champion:136}} {{champion:136}} {{champion:136}} ????
: How is her new kit better ? I was a poppy player but after her rework I stopped her completly. honnestly I think the current poppy mains are at least 90% different from pre rework ones. The point of playing poppy was to completly destroy people and dive 1v5 ezpz in the lategame after having been bullied and starved for 20 min then farmed up during the midgame. Just another tank.. this is what they turned the mighty crusher into. Thanks no more for me and obviously no refund for this shitty champion I will never touch thanks greedy messed up greatfather RIOT {{sticker:slayer-jinx-unamused}}
Did you know 90% of people make up statistics?
: playing 2 games in past 2 weeks is a lot different than playing 2 games every day like i used to. calling this playing is like saying i still play starcraft brood wars as the amount of play time weekly is about the same.
But you still played 2 games therefore that must mean that you're still playing.
Rioter Comments
: once had a J4 bot penta my team XD
: G.O.A.T. (Greatest Of All Time) Don't sell yourself short.
Is that a short joke?
Jasiwel (NA)
: Hey now, Bananas have 10.3mg of Vitamin C! ..and 422 mg of Potassium. :^)
: I mean, Bard is basically so dank he's the support, a jungler, and the second mid laner as well as the scuttle crab's bong buddy. So complaining about not getting any of those is redundant.
CC and peel of a support, ganks and roaming of a jungler, damage of a mid lane mage, sums it up pretty well
Pika Fox (NA)
: If youre challenger and youre bitching about premade 5s, then you clearly dont deserve to win the game. You lost fairly, they had better teamwork. The only pathetic person here is you.
What? The argument you made was that people don't deserve their rank because of rng.... How do premades have anything to do with this what the fuck.... Changing the subject to save face lmaooooo you are pitiful.
Pika Fox (NA)
: And all youre doing is patronizing someone who plays aram and bots for fun. Im pretty sure you can be a good player and also enjoy playing bots with friends. The two arent mutually exclusive.
Yes because you're a silver 5 player who only plays bots and arams and you're talking shit to challengers and high elo people, saying that they're shit and they don't deserve their rank... Pathetic.
Pika Fox (NA)
: Sorry i enjoy playing a game for fun. I at least get to know im better than you.
Pika Fox (NA)
: Youre saying that an individual can carry in LoL. Im saying no, your individual skill matters, but you arent going to go and 1v5 the enemy team and win. If your team cant pull their own weight, it doesnt matter how good you are, you arent going to be up 1 kills, 5000 CS, and suddenly 1v5.
Are you fucking joking kid? You really think one person of challenger rank is unable to solo carry a bronze game? You are actually the dumbest person I've ever had the misfortune of talking to.
Pika Fox (NA)
: 1) ive never been in bronze 2) Ive only played a handful of ranked games because i wanted to play a couple of games with friends Get a better argument.
You spend your time playing bots and arams, you're pathetic dude.
Pika Fox (NA)
: Not really comparable. There is only 1 ball in basketball, the entire team is always playing in LoL. You can have 12 kills, all the CS in the world, and if you get collapsed on 1v5 and locked down, youre dead and out, and your team is still garbage. All the gold being on you isnt a benefit, its a detriment.
So you're saying that someone good enough to get themselves that fed would frontline and be idiotic enough to get themselves caught out? You're delusional and you just sound like a salty little silver 5 who blames the system for being such a shit player. Also all you play are bots and aram lmao, pathetic.
: Who do you consider "League's Best Girl?"... i know what it makes me sound like but I'm curious...
: Juggernauts arent slow.... look at Udyr, Trundle, Shyvana, Garen, Olaf, and Mundo... even Nasus is fast, 350 movement speed is very fast.
: Why are americans (Not meaning everyone) so obsessed with guns?
: Maybe not something "wrong", but you do have to do something. He didn't do anything, no entity wanted retribution, and so it doesn't fit. Sorry mate, but the definition doesn't agree with you.
Are you fucking dumb, he's saying he's being unfairly punished, meaning that he's being punished with LP loss for something he DIDN'T do... is this concept that hard that you can't wrap your tiny brain around?
: I assumed, yes, and that is my fault. I was wrong, I offer no excuses just an apology however I am not trying to 'white knight' this or anything and I am more than capable of taking responsibility for my actions. Are you? I didn't take offense to what you said, I agree with you on it in principle. I took issue with how you chose to put it across. Your point could have been made just as clearly without adding "a child" to it. It diminishes the validity of your point if you add in things like that. Can you not see that?
"Don't deflect the issue onto me." Obvious victim mentality here. I still fail to understand why you're so offended by me calling ragers and flamers children... That's what raging and flaming is, a negative situation presents itself to you and, unable to control your emotions, you take it out on other people. I was simply providing an analogy with a similar situation in that small children will often have tantrums, and cry, and get overly angry since they are young and unable to control their emotions when something doesn't go right for them. Is there a problem with that? And in what way does that diminish my argument?
: My presumption, yes, but you refer to them in a derogatory tone. Don't deflect the issue onto me.
Ah so you just assumed and put words in my mouth and now you're trying to come out as the white knight of the situation, taking no responsibility for your actions. In my comment did I ever once say that 'I am superior' or that 'I claim to be better than others'? I don't get why you're so offended by what I said...
: You misunderstand. You claim to be better than others then resort to labelling those who are toxic as "a child". You could have made your point just as clearly without using that but chose not to. Consider that.
You misunderstand. I didn't claim to be better than anyone... .-. Consider that.
: > [{quoted}](name=Wumachine,realm=OCE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PUpRIVPZ,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2016-06-07T15:42:13.543+0000) > > Raging and flaming and throwing tantrums just shows that you're a child that is unable to control your emotions. As opposed to someone that thinks themselves superior / above that and resorts to demeaning tags for those beneath him / her / other.
I fail to understand why you advocate toxicity and harassment so much.
: > [{quoted}](name=Wumachine,realm=OCE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=PUpRIVPZ,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2016-06-07T15:42:13.543+0000) > > I think that's load of horse crap tbh. > > Raging and flaming and throwing tantrums just shows that you're a child that is unable to control your emotions. > > Toxicity is precisely the reason that many people outright refuse to even try the game, and it pushes people away from playing in general. " Raging and flaming and throwing tantrums just shows that you're a child that is unable to control your emotions" and reporting someone for being toxic shows that you are a LIL kid who get their feeling hurts over a game getting abuse LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL Theres a button " MUTE" unfortunately not for STOP "FEEDERS"
What you just said makes no sense... "Reporting someone for sexual abuse just shows that you are a LIL bitch who get their feeling hurts over getting abused" Yes because that is ok...
: no it shows that you have passion for something and it shows that you have testosterone unlike you
I don't see how acting like a child = being a big strong beefy man lmao.
: Just be quite, you're embarrassing you're self dude.
: Toxicity of solo queue
I think that's load of horse crap tbh. Raging and flaming and throwing tantrums just shows that you're a child that is unable to control your emotions. Toxicity is precisely the reason that many people outright refuse to even try the game, and it pushes people away from playing in general.
: adding a random frog to something does not make it a meme, he is still fundamentally talking about his gold promotions.
Definition of Meme: "an image, video, piece of text, etc., typically humorous in nature, that is copied and spread rapidly by Internet users, often with slight variations." Dat boi is a meme. That makes this a meme. Adding Dat boi to something makes it a meme. This is the Memes and Games board.
: Not sure if trolling or legit?
: shh ive maintained gold for several seasons, just have not bothered with this fake season of ranked. ????? ok ? ? ? ????
: pity that there are no valid ranked ladders at the moment so this means almost nothing, if we at least had two separate ladders one for solo and one for ranked teams this score might mean something. currently all this tells us is that you earned gold somehow, it could have been by plowing though with solo skill (unlikely), voice chat superiority vs groups of unlucky solo players, boosted with plat buddies bronze smurf accounts, and without the ability to determine those things a ranked rating is just sort of meh this season. still good for you, for what it is worth.
Sounds like a salty silver is here...
Rioter Comments
Ônyx (NA)
: PSA: As a jungler im NOT obligated to give you my buffs.
Honestly how do you run out of mana on Udyr with {{item:2032}} ?
: Wouldn't this be great in hextech crafting?
MrPharmD (NA)
: A very simple solution to the dynamic/solo queue issue
Queue times would sky-rocket even further, which is one of the main complaints about dynamic queue.
: My favorite "arguments" that Pro Solo Queue players use, and the corresponding logical fallacies. *********************************************************************************************** I. "[Riot will now self destruct, just like Blizzard]" Slippery Slope: This is a conclusion based on the premise that if A happens, then eventually through a series of small steps, through B, C,..., X, Y, Z will happen, too, basically equating A and Z. So, if we don't want Z to occur, A must not be allowed to occur either. A: Implementation of Solo Queue (some even say: "Riot's attitude") Z: Out of Business, dead game *********************************************************************************************** II. "[Riot hates its veteran players, they refuse to listen to us]" Ad populum: This is an emotional appeal that speaks to positive (such as patriotism, religion, democracy) or negative (such as terrorism or fascism) concepts rather than the real issue at hand. Equates "veteran players" with "refusal to listen to us," on Riot's behave, even though there's no inherent connection between the two. *********************************************************************************************** III. "[Look at all these threads!, look at the youtube dislikes. We ARE the majority]" Hasty Generalization: This is a conclusion based on insufficient or biased evidence. In other words, you are rushing to a conclusion before you have all the relevant facts. Why insufficient or biased evidence? They are... Voluntary Response Samples *********************************************************************************************** IV. "[demanding proof as your only recourse for arguing for Riot here is getting pretty damn tiring.]" Red Herring: This is a diversionary tactic that avoids the key issues, often by avoiding opposing arguments rather than addressing them. Switching the discussion away from the fact that you don't have evidence and focus instead on the fact that I'm beating a dead horse (your argument). *********************************************************************************************** V. "[If you're for DQ you are boosting and smurfing]" Straw Man: This move oversimplifies an opponent's viewpoint and then attacks that hollow argument. Assuming that's why they are for DQ, and that all pro DQ boost and or are smurfs *********************************************************************************************** VI. "[Riot just assumes that the majority want DQ]" Straw Man: This move oversimplifies an opponent's viewpoint and then attacks that hollow argument. Assuming that's why they made their decision, and assumes they are the minority ********************************************************************************************* VII. "[Blizzard implemented DQ and then they went crashing!]" Post hoc ergo propter hoc: This is a conclusion that assumes that if 'A' occurred after 'B' then 'B' must have caused 'A.' ********************************************************************************************** VIII. "[You're either for DQ or against DQ]" Either/or: This is a conclusion that oversimplifies the argument by reducing it to only two sides or choices. ********************************************************************************************** IX. "[There is some bias for sure, people who dislike something tend to be much more vocal about it than those who like something. However when it is such a large percentage of topics you can draw a conclusion from that.]" Red Herring: This is a diversionary tactic that avoids the key issues, often by avoiding opposing arguments rather than addressing them. You can't avoid the issue that it's a BIASED SAMPLE via VOLUNTARY RESPONSE, by stating that "[when it (Pro Solo Queue) is such a large percentage of topics, (BIASED SAMPLES), you can draw a conclusion from that.]" No. You can't draw a conclusion from that.. because it's BIASED! That's the whole point of it being biased; *********************************************************************************************** X. "[Solo queue is what most people want. I know this because the people that want solo queue have posted their opinions on it.]" Circular Argument: This restates the argument rather than actually proving it. *********************************************************************************************** Logical Fallacies: Did I miss any?
Show more


Level 150 (OCE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion