Is the removal of Kleptomancy really necessary?

I really love the concept of Klepto, getting rewards for trading, while making the trades more risky (at least the early ones) trough the lack of a combat keystone. As far as i see the biggest concern about Klepto is the dominance of free scaling ranged top laners, but is this such a big problem? In the Top 20 most played champions on Top lane right now are only 2 Klepto abusers and they are only the 13th and 14th most played Top laners. Is this really a problem that requires the removal of the above mentioned concept without giving a replacement that goes even remotely in the same direction? Could not small adjustments, like a ranged attack onto a melee opponent triggering both stacks, while only granting the reward of one or adding a cooldown be enough? Even though Klepto could still be called a niche pick it's removal would leave a big hole for champions like Ezreal of MF because all the other Keystone fell really bad on them and "Omnistone" won't change anything about that. The concept of a random Keystone is interesting, but please don't use it as a replacement for Kleptomancy and instead maybe use it as an addition to the inspiration Tree.

Estamos testando uma nova função que dá a opção de exibir os comentários da discussão em ordem cronológica. Alguns participantes notaram situações em que mostraram que uma exibição linear possa ser mais útil, então gostaríamos de saber como vocês a usariam.

Reportar como:
Ofensivo Spam Mau comportamento Fórum incorreto