There is a method to the madness - I believe.
ßluę
(NA)
I've seen a lot of discussion on the boards about balance and one of the biggest complaints being games ending too quickly. But is this really a bad thing? Games do end quickly due to the nature of snowball but I believe that on a fundamental level - games ending quickly are not a bad thing. I mean, I'm sure that everyone has busy days and I wouldn't want to be stuck in a league game for 40+ mins because some people "never surrender". Games ending within the 30 mark seem very attractive to me.
Therefore, I think the main complaint should be that champions are TOO snowball leading to zero potential for comeback later on - not that games end faster because I think that's a good thing. The problem is champions are too strong. I think Riot has tried to fix this by increasing shut-down gold, accelerating the comeback process but still trying to keep the game within the 30+ mark. This also leads us with the decreasing the potency of certain champions via dmg nerfs and buffs.
The balance team knows what they're doing but they seem to ignore a core value in league. The players. I think that some high elo players (Diamond+) should be asked by Riot for their opinion and work aside the balance team. It's only the players themselves that know the community the best - not some people on the balance team that are *cough cough* not very good at the game to balance. I believe Riot is correct in some ways to try to keep the time frame but I think that they should discuss with people who know the game inside and out.
- Citação
- Conecte-se para comentar
- Citação
- Editar
- Excluir Excluído
- Tem certeza
- Sim
- Não
- Desfazer exclusão
- Exibir na ferramenta de moderação
Mais votados
Novos
Estamos testando uma nova função que dá a opção de exibir os comentários da discussão em ordem cronológica. Alguns participantes notaram situações em que mostraram que uma exibição linear possa ser mais útil, então gostaríamos de saber como vocês a usariam.
