If "FILL" is your primary role, the "SECONDARY" Role should let us choose what role we don't want

I still don't know why we haven't done this yet.. **I'm not talking about AUTOFILL** If you go into a game and you **CHOOSE** "FILL" as your Primary Role then you don't get to choose a Secondary Role. It makes sense because "FILL" means "give me anything". Players that choose "FILL" need to be allowed a Secondary choice for a Role they DO NOT wish to play. How this would work: Choosing **FILL / BOTTOM** means a player would be queued to play any role, except ADC. Choosing **FILL / JUNGLE** means a player can be queued into any role, except Jungle. **HOW WOULD AUTOFILL WORK?** If **AUTOFILL** is Active when a player chooses **FILL / (any role)** then the player can still be placed into the undesired role if they're autofilled. If **AUTOFILL** is Protected, then the undesired role will not be assigned. **WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?** Some players choose "FILL" to just get into games quick, knowing they can play almost anywhere. Players usually have at least one role they don't want to play, and if a player is sacrificing one of their choices to be filled wherever, then it seems reasonable to allow us an option to "BAN" a role we absolutely don't want. When a player picks any two roles, they're already an exception from 3 roles. Let's give "FILL" players an option to at least be protected from playing 1 role.
Compartilhar
Mais votados Novos

Estamos testando uma nova função que dá a opção de exibir os comentários da discussão em ordem cronológica. Alguns participantes notaram situações em que mostraram que uma exibição linear possa ser mais útil, então gostaríamos de saber como vocês a usariam.

Reportar como:
Ofensivo Spam Mau comportamento Fórum incorreto
Cancelar