: You just gotta play better. Sometimes it will be your teams fault but a lot of the times they won’t feed hard enough to make the game uncarryable
: in theory if everyone is solo and no duos are encountered you would be able to hard influence (carry) only 20% of your games this means if you are very consistently playing your best you would be at 60% win rate (very high win rate) only smurfs and duos are capable of surpasing 60% TFblade once he reaches challenger 500 lp his win rate goes to 55-60% win rate so yeah the 4/5 game seems accurate but that only applies to your losses as 50% of your 8/10 games will be lost or won without you
> [{quoted}](name=Ornndyr2k19,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=74VoXEAM,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-09-12T08:08:13.940+0000) > > in theory if everyone is solo and no duos are encountered > you would be able to hard influence (carry) only 20% of your games interesting > this means if you are very consistently playing your best you would be at 60% win rate (very high win rate) > only smurfs and duos are capable of surpasing 60% I was close to 70% (cant remember exactly) when I reached gold then it was a fuckfest of trolls, inters, and unrankeds > TFblade once he reaches challenger 500 lp his win rate goes to 55-60% win rate in challenger or in gold? > so yeah the 4/5 game seems accurate > but that only applies to your losses as 50% of your 8/10 games will be lost or won without you true, even when I win I feel like they would have done well without me anyway. If I think about the games I've won recently, I played well and fed the lanes I ganked, but even if I left some lanes completely alone, they still went 6/0 on their own. And in the lost games, I camped some lanes, got my laner fed, but as soon as I left they started feeding and losing anyway.
Comentários de Rioters
Kai Guy (NA)
: https://imgur.com/a/mhkihSs
kids, never do crack https://i.ibb.co/PtMLmp9/Untitled-1.jpg
floo (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=AngelooJzC,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Bice8law,comment-id=0001000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-10T03:36:20.448+0000) > > nah I allocate wisely Haha, is that why you felt like you had something there? Or did you already realize you're not gonna "educate" a lot today?
who are you talking to exactly?
Mortismo (EUW)
: gold 4 with silver 2 mmr what will you do when nunu gets nerfed?
errr what will YOU do? You have a weird fetish with nunu or you just like don't like to make sense
: New players should be placed in Iron, not Silver. This shit causes a lot of problems.
exactly I see more gap in gold between people than in silver. I had an adc with 1/3 the other adc's farm; hadnt seen that for a long time, except for trolls. But this guy seemed to be doing his best, he was just unranked against a gold. It feels like playing an aram when bots are mixed with real players
: you can dodge
yeah, once per day at this rate I'd need 15
floo (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=AngelooJzC,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Bice8law,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-09-09T22:32:14.742+0000) > > lmao this is the typical board lurker who thinks he's good because he got carried by inters > it's your lucky day you're about to get educated > 4-5 is low, ~3 is mid, 1-2 is high > you can keep this post in a .txt for future reference, in case you don't get it the first time Maybe you should read more carefully next time then. 1. There is no more 5th division 2. I said there is no difference in silver 1-4 and barely any between silver and gold entirely Nowadays there are so many people in that cluster of silver/gold which is the main rank for anyone who begins ranked and isn't a smurf. Bronze and iron, as harsh as it may sound, is for those who are worse than average and have to learn more about the game to get better than others. Both gold and silver are filled with people who can be good at mechanics, but simply lack macro of rotations, map awareness and objective control. That's why there is no difference between those 2 tiers. Play with people in "high" gold and they will still not understand when to baron, as much as any silver player. Also who am I being educated by? Someone who got the same rank with about 6 times the amount of games played? Well at least you're good at numbers from 1 to 5 I see.
> [{quoted}](name=floo,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Bice8law,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2019-09-10T00:17:46.323+0000) > > Maybe you should read more carefully next time then. nah I allocate wisely
Hi im 12 (EUNE)
: >they're aware of the calls you make, they follow adequately. I don't know what gold you've been playing in but every time I go through gold its the same drooling special ed kids in the corner
yeah I see what you mean I got the same impression when I first reached gold, but now I feel more like they're playing carelessly on purpose than really ignoring how to play well people who unload steam because they got out of bronze, people who are used to stomp by spamming Q, and suddenly encoutering some resistance and just feeding over and over out of frustration; but once they focus and do some efforts, they actually play on a totally different level than lower elos
Comentários de Rioters
: Feel free to elaborate. We can see you are lv53 and past-season unranked right here on this page. Your current season rank is Gold IV with rather average stats and not very many games played.
: You are lv53, you are not gold MMR, probably dont belong in gold yet, and you are matched with equally new players who have not played enough to stabilize their MMR. I get matched with everything from unranked to plat, and i can safely say that has no impact on their actual abilities. Rank means very little at that point and is often wildly disconnected from MMR until people play hundreds of games.
> [{quoted}](name=MagicFlyingLlama,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=hIbwlEMB,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-09-09T23:16:51.295+0000) > > You are lv53, you are not gold MMR, probably dont belong in gold yet LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO thx for the joke xDDDD
Kai Guy (NA)
: Yea you should dodge that game. 18 / 4 / 7 6.25:1 KDA Penta Kill MVP ^ that Vayne is duoed with the bronze guy whos 14G 11W 3L 78%. Clearly unwinnable. get out now.
: is matchmaker intentionally ruining accounts, or just patehtic garbage?
lmao now a FKN BRONZE 2 ADC IN GOLD 53 FARMS TO 120 WITH AN UNRANKED TOP PURE GARBAGE MATCH MAKING AT WORK...
: is matchmaker intentionally ruining accounts, or just patehtic garbage?
And now I have an unranked and A FKN BRONZE!!! A FKN BRONZE IN GOLD LOL Riot is pathetic
Comentários de Rioters
floo (EUW)
: There is no such thing as low, mid or high silver other than numbers. Pretty much same goes for gold. The only difference between the 2 is people in gold sometimes realize they should listen to calls. Other than that barely anything.
lmao this is the typical board lurker who thinks he's good because he got carried by inters it's your lucky day you're about to get educated 4-5 is low, ~3 is mid, 1-2 is high you can keep this post in a .txt for future reference, in case you don't get it the first time
Comentários de Rioters
Comentários de Rioters
: Dude all of this "inting" you're seeing is just them getting their asses handed to them, not actual inting. Have you considered actually having presence as a jungler? Throughout those two matches, you had precisely 1 kill botlane. Your assists weren't that great, either. And in both, you had placed practically no wards - A combined total of 9 throughout two games. That's...actually pathetic. You got out-warded by a fucking *Vayne*.
https://streamable.com/sl9pq though you did try to desperately defend riot, maybe they'll give you a colored name some day
: It's not your team's fault you can't *climb*. Individual games can be lost to your team, but it's never their fault if you're hardstuck.
right now it's the teams' fault I get _demoted _ https://matchhistory.euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/EUW1/4177886713/2185850441223328?tab=overview https://matchhistory.euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/EUW1/4177904953/2185850441223328?tab=overview 8 inters in just 3 games
Comentários de Rioters
5050BS (NA)
: I finished my last game at 98 LP...... Really Riot
Once I suggested a system that would give a chance of winning free LPs as u get close to 100... Something like, you have a 80% chance of going to promo if you reach 99 LP, 70% if you're 98LP, 60% if you're 97 LP etc
: Let's face it Riot probably has no idea how any of this works. I doubt the person who created the ranked system in the first place is even still at the company, so they don't know how to change it without breaking everything, and instead just slap a new coat of paint on every now and then to give the illusion of maintenance.
aahahahahaha I like that take
Comentários de Rioters
Comentários de Rioters
: But your Elo (MMR) is supposed to BE your level. It isn't exactly that in practice because the system is not perfect, but that's what it's *supposed* to be. That's also (part of) why you get a MMR and a Rank that are not always aligned. Because MMR is supposed to be your "true" level, and just that, while Rank has a lot more conflicting goals, like pushing you to play all year long and not just your 10 placement games.
how can it reflect someone's skills when the only thing that influences mmr is winning or losing a game?
: Why "in high Elo"? If the system works correctly, **everyone** is getting fair games, not just the people at the top, there is nothing specific about them. So everyone should be at the same winrate, except for (small) statistical fluctuations.
the system chooses people in the same elo, so if you're playing at a lower elo it cannot give you players of your level
: No you don't. The game does when you hover over an enemy with the intent of Q'ing at them and as demonstrated it does it incorrectly.
what I'm saying is that you choose it before Qing I have experienced it before with riven, and lately I have with nunu; though it's annoying, I've always thought of it as a normal mechanic that I had to think of before Qing
: So what do you think about people who do manage to climb? What's the difference? Why is the algorithm treating them differently?
there can be tons of reasons -they might be privileged because they bought RPs or are identified as streamers -they might be privileged because of their behaviour (high honor, low reports etc) -they might be randomly picked to be in the "winning bracket" aside from algorythm -they might get good teams and face bad teams, repeatedly, simply by chance -they might just be lucky consistently (on the billions of games played, that definitely happens) -their play style and attitude might give them an advantage when paired with bad players (like being a hypocrite doormat and overlooking annoying brats) -they aren't advantaged, they just play better; instead, it's people like me who are disadvantaged (because of not buying RPs, "negative behaviour"...?) a few explainations that came to mind
: I get what you are saying , its not normal, teams dont try to win and it seems the enemy team allways has someone actually trying to do something. Its frustrating , you know you are better than this but the game wont let you climb. There should be individual ranking systems, its called solo/duo but the team of 5 fucks up ur game, why is it solo/duo if u relly on them? A big percentage of us is not where they are supposed to be.
Exactly... People ruin the game because you took one of their cs, because you ganked at 7:23 instead of 7:22... The only people who manage to climb play very specific champs and learn to trick idiots into winning despite their intention to lose lol...
: To be fair, you are playing a jungle that relies on your team. So maybe its time to give up on nunu and try something that doesnt rely on these r%%%%%s as much.
I see extremely few junglers that don't rely on the team... Maybe kha zix and shaco?
: > [{quoted}](name=DeathBurst,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=2V2aHnHe,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2019-08-23T12:21:41.583+0000) > > Can I ask you a question? > > Imagine we are in an ideal world and matchmaking is perfect. Every game is fair, and both team are of exactly equal strength every time. In that perfect world, what would your winrate be?
That would be 50%... IN HIGH ELO THOUGH {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}}
: > [{quoted}](name=AngelooJzC,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=OE0lJIn1,comment-id=0004000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-27T00:52:58.883+0000) > > Really? How does posting 10 different games, circling out the KDAs, can make you think I want to highlight their names? > I'm pretty sure that a topic named RIOT DOES THIS intends to attract attention on riot's actions and not players. I’m talking about this post. Like the one you and I are commenting on right now.
> [{quoted}](name=Periscope,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=OE0lJIn1,comment-id=00040000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-27T01:23:19.952+0000) > > I’m talking about this post. Like the one you and I are commenting on right now. lol are you serious? The topic is literally TITLED "naming and shaming"
Comentários de Rioters
: > [{quoted}](name=AngelooJzC,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=OE0lJIn1,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2019-08-23T09:50:19.897+0000) > > LOL the only reason this rule exists, is to avoid the boards getting flooded with "kevin_yasuo7457 is an inter and a flamer". Ya, I think that’d be a lot of wasted space. > Which has nothing to do with my topic. None of your rules apply either, my topic was about riot ruining games, not the people ? Your title, pictures, and most of your content seem devoted to naming and shaming.
> [{quoted}](name=Periscope,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=OE0lJIn1,comment-id=000400000000,timestamp=2019-08-23T11:19:48.120+0000) > ? Your title, pictures, and most of your content seem devoted to naming and shaming. Really? How does posting 10 different games, circling out the KDAs, can make you think I want to highlight their names? I'm pretty sure that a topic named RIOT DOES THIS intends to attract attention on riot's actions and not players.
Proxy345 (NA)
: This game can really feel like a huge waste of time sometimes honestly
matchmaking has become the biggest ennemy in the game, look at this https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/2V2aHnHe-team-algorithm-is-designed-to-prevent-you-from-climbing this is what happens when you don't dodge
: No reason at all https://i.ibb.co/W2Wn9TB/noreas.jpg
> [{quoted}](name=AngelooJzC,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=s28AAoLp,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2019-08-23T04:02:02.121+0000) > > No reason at all > > https://i.ibb.co/W2Wn9TB/noreas.jpg imagine people downvote MEMES
: team algorithm is designed to prevent you from climbing
wasnt lying, riot intentionally int games https://i.ibb.co/qpd0SfH/rigged.jpg
R4ndom F1nn (EUNE)
: All part of the 50% holy winrate riot wants everyone to have
I doubt In 10 games, they lost me 8. Or it's part of the algorithm to screw a minority of accounts to make the majority closer to 50%
: Hey there, There's a lot of reasons behind the naming and shaming rule that was involved in some recent removals you had. 1. Players should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to reform when they've been negative in game. 2. We simply don't have access to all of the information behind a player's game to definitively judge a person as toxic. Often times that's lacking a recording or all of the chat leading up to, during, and after a game. 3. There is no guarantee that a player's actions will get looked into if they're posted on the boards. Rioters are not obligated to look into such behavior/actions, although occasionally they have. This is why such removals are accompanied by report/support ticket instructions. 4. Images can be manipulated and can thus provide false information. 5. There are few exceptions, such as popular streamers, due to the fact they're affiliated with Riot and have already posted their content online. There should be a *reasonable* area of discussion for abhorrent League behavior, but that shouldn't lead to increasing toxicity in the form of witch hunts. Edit: I'll also point out that warnings are atypical for these removals, but there were several, similar removals. And you'd also posted that content in a thread where I'd specifically stated that wasn't ok.
LOL the only reason this rule exists, is to avoid the boards getting flooded with "kevin_yasuo7457 is an inter and a flamer". Which has nothing to do with my topic. None of your rules apply either, my topic was about riot ruining games, not the people
: No. It dashes in the direction she is facing unless you target an enemy unit in which case it will dash in their direction if necessary but if the target is moving it will instead dash to/face a position infront of and potentially away from the target.
Comentários de Rioters
Rockman (NA)
: You literally don't have to be specific.
> [{quoted}](name=Rockman,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=OE0lJIn1,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-08-23T04:00:45.477+0000) > > You literally don't have to be specific. yeah just as you don't have to censor the names names are just irrelevant and nobody cares about them
: Is there a reason Riot doesn't listen to their player base anymore?
No reason at all https://i.ibb.co/W2Wn9TB/noreas.jpg
Comentários de Rioters
: [GAMEPLAY] Riven's Q With 100% Consistency Fails to Deal Damage
I don't get it. Doesn't the Q follow your cursor?

AngelooJzC

Nível 56 (EUW)
Total de votos positivos
Criar uma discussão