: Some thoughts on more dated female champions, from a girl
While we're at it, cover up up the bare chested male champs and those wearing sleeveless shirts. Makes sense.
: Up until season 8, season 6 was the unanimous worst season in the game. And a big reason why isn't just dynamic queue alone, but the fact that riot actively ignored the entire community as a whole who were all collectively saying "bring back soloQ" the entire season in _every form of input_ (surveys, reddit, boards, twitch streams, pro players on twitter, their own roundtable). And season 8 was literally the exact same "new runes are shit, too much damage in the game" feedback from literally everyone, from everywhere and they aren't listening to that even now. I'm doubtful that hoping that things change is going to change or fix anything.
> [{quoted}](name=flibitydoo,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=TPaXKKw8,comment-id=00020001,timestamp=2018-11-18T19:59:04.462+0000) > > Up until season 8, season 6 was the unanimous worst season in the game. And a big reason why isn't just dynamic queue alone, but the fact that riot actively ignored the entire community as a whole who were all collectively saying "bring back soloQ" the entire season in _every form of input_ (surveys, reddit, boards, twitch streams, pro players on twitter, their own roundtable). > > And season 8 was literally the exact same "new runes are shit, too much damage in the game" feedback from literally everyone, from everywhere and they aren't listening to that even now. > > I'm doubtful that hoping that things change is going to change or fix anything. Don't forget people came out from an all time high in Season 5. Towers were in a good place, Tank meta was there (a bit overbearing), ADC's weren't useless, Mages could actually be countered. Damage wasn't anywhere near this high. CDR wasn't heavily available. Jungle was actually good. Then they started stripping away everything and DQ was the final straw. I'm pretty sure over half my friends list stopped playing because of DQ. S8 to me isn't as bad but it's a close second.
D4M2X0 (EUW)
: full AD = high chance of winning, full ap = autolose
Laughing at how ignorant this post is. First of all, full AP? Really? Secondly, MR is shit. With the exception of tanks, hitting above 100MR is hard to do and even when you do, they buy one item that negates 40% OF THAT! Then don't forget the 33 from boots and morello. Sudden impact makes that 39 Flat MRpen. Case in point, look at this video: https://youtu.be/xEzsxkt-6RA?t=1726 Now think before you post non-factual statements. thanks m8
: Why are there multiple magic resist + AD items, and only like 1 armor + AP item?
Are you for real rn? Okay let me explain. It's pretty simple actually. MR IS A JOKE! Except you're tank late game, then you're screwed. And then even when we build these so called "MR + AD" items, we don't have enough HP for them to be effective! Plus why bother building MR when void staff negates a whooping FOURTY PERCENT OF IT! Meaning that even if by some miracle, you get 200 MR, that's 80 MR already gone with just that item. Throw in Sorcs, Morello and you're left with less than 100 MR. See how friggin dumb that is? And what is the trade off for all that magic pen? Well nothing! Because you actually GAIN shit instead of losing out.
Eedat (NA)
: I'm not "triggered" by you throwing insults.
If inters aren't as banned as toxic people, then I really don't care for the system. A mute button exists. I see insults as a distraction and mute accordingly. I don't have to be offended to do so. However inters make the game nearly impossible to win and since Rito's algorithm doesn't help punish them, then it's an insanely flawed system. But hey, go awf sis.
: 2015 Preseason Spotlight.. TOWERS.
Most balanced League season idc.
: You wouldn't work without pay. Why should Riot?
Not one is saying Riot should work without pay, people are saying that Riot is becoming greedy and everything is overpriced. Every skin now is 1350 RP with borders and chromas. Every update has a ton of icons that no one gives a shit about. Every update passes by with them not reducing the cost of champions faster which makes the game a fucking grind. It's that shit that annoys people. Oh you got a bunch of free skins, whoop-de-fcking-doo. But guess what, they been making profits since 2015 afaik. So miss me with that "Riot is generous" bs.
: What the fuck is wrong with Yi?
Yi and Tryndamere are fundamentally broken at any given point in this current meta. Why? Because they have the ability to churn out true/high dmg after a few items. The literally outscale any of their counters and take a whole team to stop. They need reworks. Especially tryndamere. Having 35% crit available from level 1 is not healthy in the slightest.
: What in the flying fuck is wrong with the damage in this game???
I mean, technically, ignite at that level probably takes about 1/4 of your hp alone. Not far-fetched tbh.
: You guys nerfed this for a reason right? Why in hell are you rebuffing it?
I mean, it's not like he has a skin coming out and they want people to buy it. Nope. Definitely not the reason.
: I'm Sure Kha Won't Be Broken At All in 8.19
Anecdote but I played 4 "high elo" games with him since the patch. 100% winrate with at least 9 kills per game. Seems stronger than usual.
Hayaishi (NA)
: why does shroud needs to give her back energy? Why is her E recast global? Why is shroud duration extended whenever she re-enters it? That champion has so much unnecessary power its ridiculous.
> [{quoted}](name=Hayaishi,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Lw7Htw5N,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-09-21T04:40:43.570+0000) > > why does shroud needs to give her back energy? > > Why is her E recast global? > > Why is shroud duration extended whenever she re-enters it? > > That champion has so much unnecessary power its ridiculous. - Because all energy champs need a way to regen energy since there's literally no other way besides blue buff. - Does it matter ? Very easy to counter since you know where she's landing - Because that's the duration her shroud was pre-rework - Unnecessary power, maybe. But I pref this to pre-rework Akali who destroyed you post-6 instantly. Old akali almost never ran out of energy with her chain Qs.
Kythers (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Primaquarius,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=AWepnJdX,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-09-19T22:53:13.839+0000) > > If this change happens, Pyke would be useless, considering he cant be tanky oh shut up pyke has no weaknesses besides being melee
> [{quoted}](name=Kythers,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=AWepnJdX,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2018-09-19T23:29:14.915+0000) > > oh shut up > > pyke has no weaknesses besides being melee So much BS in this reply that it stinks
Comentários de Rioters
: If you play competitive for a while the balance issues will eventually get under your skin.
> [{quoted}](name=IAintDarius,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=tnIAhYov,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2018-09-11T14:54:16.367+0000) > > If you play competitive for a while the balance issues will eventually get under your skin. I can see this happening but I'm not good enough yet for that to get to me.
: Have fun with Bridgittewatch! Her addition ruined the game for me. Power creep on new characters was too insane.
> [{quoted}](name=WhiteUranium,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=tnIAhYov,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2018-09-11T16:37:19.009+0000) > > Have fun with Bridgittewatch! > > Her addition ruined the game for me. Power creep on new characters was too insane. I feel she does too much damage for a "support". Moira too.
: For the love of low ranks: Find a Way to Nerf Zed
Just so you know, ANY champ can hard carry in low elo. Pick AD janna top and you can carry. Nerfing Zed will create a power vacuum and then the nerf cycle will continue.
afmghost (NA)
: Look at these fanatics, dissing Overwatch as they defend league. Overwatch, for one, has a lot more character balance than League. I mean some characters are too powerful, but it's mostly fair. League is just a mess. It also is less luck based. In league, if you're paired with a player who is either a thrower or just plain stinks, the only way the other team benefits (besides having more skill) is through ultimate charge. They don't deal more damage or have more health because of it, they just get their ultimate charged a bit quicker. Depsite all these serious fields that Overwatch dominates League over, these guys still stand by the inferior game.
> [{quoted}](name=afmghost,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=tnIAhYov,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2018-09-11T01:48:10.552+0000) > > Look at these fanatics, dissing Overwatch as they defend league. > Overwatch, for one, has a lot more character balance than League. I mean some characters are too powerful, but it's mostly fair. League is just a mess. > It also is less luck based. In league, if you're paired with a player who is either a thrower or just plain stinks, the only way the other team benefits (besides having more skill) is through ultimate charge. They don't deal more damage or have more health because of it, they just get their ultimate charged a bit quicker. > > Depsite all these serious fields that Overwatch dominates League over, these guys still stand by the inferior game. I feel it's actually a lot more balanced than league *(currently). But I see a lot of hate.
: As someone who played over 500 hours of that game, I'd quit as soon as possible.
> [{quoted}](name=MetaVolca,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=tnIAhYov,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-09-11T01:35:56.597+0000) > > As someone who played over 500 hours of that game, I'd quit as soon as possible. Any reasons in particular?
vimaid (NA)
: ive played over watch and it gets worse as you play i talk from expierience i am level 800+ and they ruined the game with the addition of Brigitte.
> [{quoted}](name=vimaid,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=tnIAhYov,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-09-11T01:17:35.499+0000) > > ive played over watch and it gets worse as you play i talk from expierience i am level 800+ and they ruined the game with the addition of Brigitte. Level 800+? That's a ton of games. I mean balance wise, there are some CLEAR issues but overall, it's a fun experience right now. I'll have to play competitive to know if I'll continue for long.
: Believe it or not, on this boards, that's an unpopular vocal opinion you got there
> [{quoted}](name=flibitydoo,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=tnIAhYov,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-09-11T01:11:21.491+0000) > > Believe it or not, on this boards, that's an unpopular vocal opinion you got there I mean I just started so who knows.
: > [{quoted}](name=Anin777,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=KHlp7UjX,comment-id=00420000000000000000,timestamp=2018-09-11T01:37:28.695+0000) > > You're missing something. If a beginner picks Zed vs. Plat Irelia, he'll lose lane 100% of the time and call Zed "hard" or "Weak". If you play against unskilled players, then your experience is easier. It's all dependent on your opponents. How long will you dodge the actual topic of the thread? Opponents don't make a champion more mechanically difficult to use.
> [{quoted}](name=BearExperiment,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=KHlp7UjX,comment-id=004200000000000000000000,timestamp=2018-09-11T04:56:43.314+0000) > > How long will you dodge the actual topic of the thread? Opponents don't make a champion more mechanically difficult to use. No! YOU are messing up the definition. Basketball will be easier when you're just shooting baskets but then you add opponents and the difficulty increases. Playing Zed against inexperienced laners will make him FEEL easy. You don't have to think alot. You don't push your limits. You don't take calculated risks or learn different combos. You just ... play. Mechanically you're weak af. I used to think I was the best Jax EUW when I was level 30 cos I had over 300 games with him back in s3. Then I jumped in ranked and got instantly dominated and this was bronze. He wasn't "easy to play" anymore.
: We are talking about how easy he is is to pick up and play, not how easily he can win games or not.
> [{quoted}](name=BearExperiment,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=KHlp7UjX,comment-id=0042000000000000,timestamp=2018-09-10T00:24:31.694+0000) > > We are talking about how easy he is is to pick up and play, not how easily he can win games or not. You're missing something. If a beginner picks Zed vs. Plat Irelia, he'll lose lane 100% of the time and call Zed "hard" or "Weak". If you play against unskilled players, then your experience is easier. It's all dependent on your opponents.
: > [{quoted}](name=Anin777,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=yjd6TdJz,comment-id=000800000001,timestamp=2018-09-10T00:18:31.069+0000) > > If it's "freelo" champ, then why haven't you used him to get out of gold 5? You literally have only one game as Yasuo and you lost 3/10/5. If this "windwall" ability is oh so strong, then why don't you abuse it? There's a fucking reason, and it's not Yasuo. Check yourself. Rank shaming is not acceptable. I also don't want to be one of those person to use the easy to victory. I also don't played on this account for 2 month so your comment is invalid.
> [{quoted}](name=Press Q Win,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=yjd6TdJz,comment-id=0008000000010000,timestamp=2018-09-10T00:28:30.909+0000) > > Rank shaming is not acceptable. I also don't want to be one of those person to use the easy to victory. I also don't played on this account for 2 month so your comment is invalid. It's not rank shaming. It's a legitimate question. "Easy way to victory" LMFAO! You cannot say that man. Until you have played a lot of games with at least 50% winrate, then you can't call a champ "easy". You haven't played for 2 months, yes, but you have also played only one game as Yasuo and did Horribly. Not sure what your argument is rn.
Comentários de Rioters
: > [{quoted}](name=AmazoX,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=yjd6TdJz,comment-id=0008,timestamp=2018-09-09T15:44:59.781+0000) > > For how linear and basic his kit is, he deserves to keep Wind Wall, without it, Yasuo cannot operate, and he had Wind Wall since release, he only ever got overpowered twice and it never was because of Wind Wall. > > #*The first time* > > SEASON 6 Warlords Bloodlust keystone which gave healing that also got doubled upon critical strike. > > #*The Second Time* > > After Mage update, ArKaDaTa made the frozen force build which had him abusing Trinity force critical chance. > > That is IT. This ability that can block most projectiles in the game has never ever made him broken neither was it ever the reason for his pick even in professional team oriented matches. No, Yasuo being at 63 % ban rate prove my point. Something is frustrating to play against Yasuo and this thing is his WINDWALL. Stop trying to defend your freelo champ.
> [{quoted}](name=Press Q Win,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=yjd6TdJz,comment-id=00080000,timestamp=2018-09-09T15:57:14.269+0000) > > No, Yasuo being at 63 % ban rate prove my point. Something is frustrating to play against Yasuo and this thing is his WINDWALL. Stop trying to defend your freelo champ. If it's "freelo" champ, then why haven't you used him to get out of gold 5? You literally have only one game as Yasuo and you lost 3/10/5. If this "windwall" ability is oh so strong, then why don't you abuse it? There's a fucking reason, and it's not Yasuo. Check yourself.
Pale Mask (EUW)
: So, Netflix is supposedly going to cast a non-white actress as Ciri for their Witcher show
Okay as a "minority", here are my thoughts: I think the race/religion/Sexual orientation of a character in any adaptation should not matter as long as it is not essential to the story or as long as it is not contradictory. So say making T'Challa white, that won't work seeing as him being black is part of what defines his character. Looking at this character, she can be played by any race and that'll be fine. Now here's the problem. Since the push for "representation", white people have been demonised a whole lot and I can understand why there is a bit of outrage over this. What I'm trying to say is, the race of the person playing this person wouldn't have mattered if SJWs didn't make race an "obvious" characteristic in movies.
: That's the elo getting harder not zed. You have to be good enough with any champion to continue a climb, that's why people stop climbing.
> [{quoted}](name=Boatwhistle,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=KHlp7UjX,comment-id=00420000,timestamp=2018-09-09T02:51:35.664+0000) > > That's the elo getting harder not zed. You have to be good enough with any champion to continue a climb, that's why people stop climbing. Saying "X champ is easy to play" doesn't mean much. You have to ask "against what champ?", "How skilled is your lane opponent?". If you play any champ in Normals for 100 games, you can easily get gold with that champ. But going against more skilled opponents, you need to get better at the champ. Every champ is easy to start playing when you aren't against skilled opponents, some easier than others (Garen easier than Azir; You get the point). So what OP said is true for every champ. Not specific to Zed.
: > [{quoted}](name=Anin777,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=2bZ5VH01,comment-id=00060000000100000000,timestamp=2018-09-07T23:14:23.414+0000) > > Lool what a first world definition of "treated like shit". Women are being turned away from jobs, being sold to slavery of all kinds, beaten up but nope, someone assuming you lack knowledge is "being treated like shit". I give up. Girl bye.
> [{quoted}](name=Spank the Fox,realm=OCE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=2bZ5VH01,comment-id=000600000001000000000000,timestamp=2018-09-08T02:17:32.988+0000) > > Girl bye. Ahh look, someone who's some comfortable in her first world skin that she can't stand to think of anything else. You close minded af. Fix up.
: Zed is way too over played, can we all finally admit it is because he is very easy to play?
Any champ is "easy to play" in Bronze - Gold. From Plat +, you start getting punished easily. If I play against a Zed with anything less than 50 games with over 50% winrate, he's losing. Facts.
: > [{quoted}](name=Anin777,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=2bZ5VH01,comment-id=000600000001,timestamp=2018-09-06T12:55:40.323+0000) > > They don't get treated like shit. The part about assumption is right. But then the same can be said for fashion. Would you rather go to a bro to ask if your outfit is tight, or your girlfriend? It's human nature to subconsciously create stereotypes. You see mostly male mechanics and assume most males know about cars (I personally don't know squat). You see mostly females on runways and assume women know more about fashion. It's everywhere. And female mechanics are welcomed with open arms once they prove their expertise. There's one thing men respect above all and and that's skill. I reckon being talked to like you have no clue what you’re talking about based on your gender is a pretty shit way to treat someone. But that’s just me
> [{quoted}](name=Spank the Fox,realm=OCE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=2bZ5VH01,comment-id=0006000000010000,timestamp=2018-09-06T14:05:34.580+0000) > > I reckon being talked to like you have no clue what you’re talking about based on your gender is a pretty shit way to treat someone. > > But that’s just me Lool what a first world definition of "treated like shit". Women are being turned away from jobs, being sold to slavery of all kinds, beaten up but nope, someone assuming you lack knowledge is "being treated like shit". I give up.
hotarse (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Anin777,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=2bZ5VH01,comment-id=000a0000,timestamp=2018-09-06T12:50:37.710+0000) > > I love how highly self-centred women are. > "He picked on me because I'm a woman" > Lool I get the same shit with guys threatening to sodomize me for bad gameplay. I don't cry about that shit. I play. Trolls don't use sexist insults because you're a woman but because you let it get to you. I promise if you are unphased, they'll change their tactics. Internet 101 people, don't be bothered by the internet. Just because you're too scared to stand up for yourself doesn't mean others shouldn't.
> [{quoted}](name=hotarse,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=2bZ5VH01,comment-id=000a00000000,timestamp=2018-09-06T15:38:00.147+0000) > > Just because you're too scared to stand up for yourself doesn't mean others shouldn't. Lool. Yeah. This is how you sound: "Let me take it upon myself to get angry and defensive because an anonymous stranger on the internet said some bad things about me even though he doesn't know me". Does that sound smart?
: > [{quoted}](name=MrFawknSunshine,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=2bZ5VH01,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2018-09-05T21:57:08.163+0000) > > i guess the auto repair industry is sexist too cuz its dominated by men by like 95%. I mean, they openly treat women like shit systematically. Ask your women friends how they get treated like they automatically get treated they know nothing about cars solely because of their gender. Happens more than you think.
> [{quoted}](name=Spank the Fox,realm=OCE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=2bZ5VH01,comment-id=00060000,timestamp=2018-09-05T22:50:57.099+0000) > > I mean, they openly treat women like shit systematically. > > Ask your women friends how they get treated like they automatically get treated they know nothing about cars solely because of their gender. > > Happens more than you think. They don't get treated like shit. The part about assumption is right. But then the same can be said for fashion. Would you rather go to a bro to ask if your outfit is tight, or your girlfriend? It's human nature to subconsciously create stereotypes. You see mostly male mechanics and assume most males know about cars (I personally don't know squat). You see mostly females on runways and assume women know more about fashion. It's everywhere. And female mechanics are welcomed with open arms once they prove their expertise. There's one thing men respect above all and and that's skill.
: Listen, dude, to be real I've dealt with 3 sexist trainwrecks of humanbeings this week, I won't type a blog post about it (if you wanna know, ask), but toxic a*holes like to pick out anything out of the norm, could be ethnicity, age, sexual orientation, whatever, and they will beeline for it. So they beeline for girls. Yes, it's not fair to give all gamers a bad rep because we're not these people's keepers, but they do exist and they are a huge turn-off when it comes to gaming. As for women in gaming industry, like most of the sexism in that is SUPER-indirect, it's mostly to do with their education and how they were encouraged, it's not on an industry to hire under-qualified workers, true. But when they do get them it is up to them to treat them right.
> [{quoted}](name=NekoniClaws,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=2bZ5VH01,comment-id=000a,timestamp=2018-09-05T22:28:09.870+0000) > > Listen, dude, to be real I've dealt with 3 sexist trainwrecks of humanbeings this week, I won't type a blog post about it (if you wanna know, ask), but toxic a*holes like to pick out anything out of the norm, could be ethnicity, age, sexual orientation, whatever, and they will beeline for it. So they beeline for girls. Yes, it's not fair to give all gamers a bad rep because we're not these people's keepers, but they do exist and they are a huge turn-off when it comes to gaming. > > As for women in gaming industry, like most of the sexism in that is SUPER-indirect, it's mostly to do with their education and how they were encouraged, it's not on an industry to hire under-qualified workers, true. But when they do get them it is up to them to treat them right. I love how highly self-centred women are. "He picked on me because I'm a woman" Lool I get the same shit with guys threatening to sodomize me for bad gameplay. I don't cry about that shit. I play. Trolls don't use sexist insults because you're a woman but because you let it get to you. I promise if you are unphased, they'll change their tactics. Internet 101 people, don't be bothered by the internet.
D357R0Y3R (EUW)
: Women being uninterested in video games is just a pure stereotype I don't get who do you think you are to claim something that you just imagine in your mind >if they want to be gamers, they will be welcomed. https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/MvsksxvBFqFaJTXeFbDI66hk0H4Ii2IFLx25zq9Ke2I/https/i.gyazo.com/thumb/1200/895fe7a239e44e56ad5a4b5f73bce51b-png.jpg I guess no one here has an idea of the amount of sexism girls encounter in games PS: **yes this pax fiasco was an aberration from riot** and **Yes, sexism against women in video games is still real**
> [{quoted}](name=D357R0Y3R,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=2bZ5VH01,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-09-05T20:06:06.037+0000) > > Women being uninterested in video games is just a pure stereotype > > I don't get who do you think you are to claim something that you just imagine in your mind > > https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/MvsksxvBFqFaJTXeFbDI66hk0H4Ii2IFLx25zq9Ke2I/https/i.gyazo.com/thumb/1200/895fe7a239e44e56ad5a4b5f73bce51b-png.jpg > > I guess no one here has an idea of the amount of sexism girls encounter in games > > PS: **yes this pax fiasco was an aberration from riot** > and > **Yes, sexism against women in video games is still real** Lol compared to what I've received, this is child's play. It's toxic people, not men.
: > [{quoted}](name=Anin777,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=YTwOVAyt,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2018-09-04T10:41:22.107+0000) > > First of all, it's irelia so honestly dgaf. Secondly. Let's analyze it. He hit every single ability. Before than he cleaved her fully meaning she had WAYYY less armor and he had a ton of AD and lethality AND ignite. So seems pretty normal given the state of the game. > > Side note: So we're just gonna ignore the fact that irelia almost killed him without ult? Okay. https://streamable.com/4ijmo Now I know I was 2 levels down but she literally only managed to auto me twice, missed her E, missed her R and almost kills me with ignite. Irelia is bullshit. Ignite is bullshit.
> [{quoted}](name=Antenora,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=YTwOVAyt,comment-id=00060001,timestamp=2018-09-04T12:02:56.288+0000) > > https://streamable.com/4ijmo > > > Now I know I was 2 levels down but she literally only managed to auto me twice, missed her E, missed her R and almost kills me with ignite. > > Irelia is bullshit. > Ignite is bullshit. That's actually BS. Meaning if she hit one of those abilities, you'd be dead almost instantly.
D357R0Y3R (EUW)
: >Side note: So we're just gonna ignore the fact that irelia almost killed him without ult? Okay. yea? i don't know what the fuck is this thread also zed's damage done on shields still increases his ult damage so sterak is useless if it didn't enchanters would completly nullify his damage
> [{quoted}](name=D357R0Y3R,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=YTwOVAyt,comment-id=00060000,timestamp=2018-09-04T11:17:27.153+0000) > > yea? i don't know what the fuck is this thread > also zed's damage done on shields still increases his ult damage so sterak is useless > > if it didn't enchanters would completly nullify his damage Exactly. Not saying the damage isn't bullshit (it's bullshit) but compared to some of the shit I see TFBlade do with irelia to MULTIPLE enemies, this is nothing.
: Does Zed needs a buff?
First of all, it's irelia so honestly dgaf. Secondly. Let's analyze it. He hit every single ability. Before than he cleaved her fully meaning she had WAYYY less armor and he had a ton of AD and lethality AND ignite. So seems pretty normal given the state of the game. Side note: So we're just gonna ignore the fact that irelia almost killed him without ult? Okay.
4eva (EUW)
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=Tetsuo and Youth,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=EAjQQWz8,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2018-09-03T16:59:59.635+0000) > > they need to nerf his ridiculous lane sustain with the regen passive, do that and he will be quite balanced. Nope. It's there to make up for his lack of HP. Do you know how hard he get cucked by poke lanes?
Saibbo (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=PrismalDawn,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=7r0WK1zs,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-09-01T22:09:39.183+0000) > > Someone fill me in, what happened? > Which riot employee made eye contact for too long? The usual journalist that made a 5000 words essay from 3/4 woman that worked at riot talking about being harassed and stuff, blown out of proportion rightfully or not, but now they did restricted the entranced in a room at PAX to only woman and non-binary people until a certain hour because of that, like they did a good move to not be considered a sexist company by some anymore
> [{quoted}](name=Saibbo,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=7r0WK1zs,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2018-09-02T09:55:51.445+0000) > > The usual journalist that made a 5000 words essay from 3/4 woman that worked at riot talking about being harassed and stuff, blown out of proportion rightfully or not, but now they did restricted the entranced in a room at PAX to only woman and non-binary people until a certain hour because of that, like they did a good move to not be considered a sexist company by some anymore Thought it was 28 women/men?
: > [{quoted}](name=Clockwork Mouse,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ocN6f7jO,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-09-02T22:55:39.814+0000) > > it is a damn shame that some people need the roles reversed to be able to understand how sexist it was for Riot to do this. What's even worse is that even looking at it with the roles reverse, some people still think that this current situation is fine (but the reverse is terrible).
> [{quoted}](name=DotEleven,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ocN6f7jO,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-09-02T22:57:14.912+0000) > > What's even worse is that even looking at it with the roles reverse, some people still think that this current situation is fine (but the reverse is terrible). And THAT my friend, is called bias.
: it is a damn shame that some people need the roles reversed to be able to understand how sexist it was for Riot to do this.
> [{quoted}](name=Clockwork Mouse,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ocN6f7jO,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-09-02T22:55:39.814+0000) > > it is a damn shame that some people need the roles reversed to be able to understand how sexist it was for Riot to do this. But isn't that how society in general is?
: NO MORE RP PURCHASES!!!!!
Lool what took you so long?
Comentários de Rioters
: > [{quoted}](name=Anin777,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=o5EdEfyP,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2018-09-01T03:43:11.904+0000) > > Racial diversity should be considered is when your target audience consists of a substantial amount of other races. In that scenario you need input from "representatives" of other races so you don't create a product that doesn't appeal to them. Take Riot for example. Gameplay>Lore. In gameplay, you need intellectual diversity because that's how you achieve balance. In Lore, you don't necessarily need race diversity because tbh Runeterra isn't even on earth and there are different cultures that don't translate into the ones on earth. Wait so you achieve balance by making champs diverse or by actually balancing the game? Smh
> [{quoted}](name=RyzeTheSmurfMage,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=o5EdEfyP,comment-id=000400000000,timestamp=2018-09-01T05:15:59.742+0000) > > Wait so you achieve balance by making champs diverse or by actually balancing the game? Smh By having an INTELLECTUALLY diverse team, you balance the game.
: No, people wanted *all* the turrets buffed. They wanted more damage, they wanted true damage, they wanted %percent health damage, they wanted a whole lot more stuff than just "buffing turrets". They wanted the return of the tower shield, they wanted constant tracking of targets even through untargetibility, they wanted to somehow be safe from 2v1 dives when the enemy pushed the minions into their turret. The community had mixed, extreme wants for towers. The turret changes here are all focused on the first tower, mainly on durability, maybe on damage. The changes as a whole, aren't to buff turrets entirely, but to let laning phase draw out longer. Don't act like "Oh wow, they're *finally* listening to us", when we've give a whole lot of shitty ideas.
> [{quoted}](name=Dr Mercy,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=RiTzk6ch,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-08-31T22:39:43.454+0000) > > No, people wanted *all* the turrets buffed. They wanted more damage, they wanted true damage, they wanted %percent health damage, they wanted a whole lot more stuff than just "buffing turrets". They wanted the return of the tower shield, they wanted constant tracking of targets even through untargetibility, they wanted to somehow be safe from 2v1 dives when the enemy pushed the minions into their turret. The community had mixed, extreme wants for towers. > > The turret changes here are all focused on the first tower, mainly on durability, maybe on damage. The changes as a whole, aren't to buff turrets entirely, but to let laning phase draw out longer. Don't act like "Oh wow, they're *finally* listening to us", when we've give a whole lot of shitty ideas. Lool this is a dumb argument. Of course we want ALL towers to be buffed back to s5 standards. The current state of towers is a joke. People were throwing out suggestions like that because 1 champ could tank 40+ NEXUS TOWER SHOTS. Don't act like the outrage wasn't warranted.
: Very wrong. If a bunch of "intellectual diversity" was just a bunch of purple people, something is up and it's not really diverse.
> [{quoted}](name=Colonel J,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=o5EdEfyP,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2018-08-31T22:57:18.733+0000) > > Very wrong. > > If a bunch of "intellectual diversity" was just a bunch of purple people, something is up and it's not really diverse. Do you know what diversity is?
: Well... yes and no. Actually, it might be better to say "yes and not necessarily". You could potentially have a room filled with people who are of the same race/ethnicity and all think vastly different from one another due to factors beyond their racial/ethnic identity. However, intellectual diversity is logistically far more common in a racially/ethnically diverse group since they will all most likely come from far different backgrounds and therefore have very different worldviews, whereas it might be harder to find different points of view in a group containing one or few demographics. Yes, you should definitely value intellectual diversity above racial diversity, but you could also get intellectual diversity more easily _through_ racial diversity. Again, this is all just logistics and technicalities; I'm not really trying to argue or anything. I just thought I'd throw this out there.
> [{quoted}](name=Kairoptra,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=o5EdEfyP,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2018-08-31T22:01:53.628+0000) > > Well... yes and no. Actually, it might be better to say "yes and not necessarily". You could potentially have a room filled with people who are of the same race/ethnicity and all think vastly different from one another due to factors beyond their racial/ethnic identity. However, intellectual diversity is logistically far more common in a racially/ethnically diverse group since they will all most likely come from far different backgrounds and therefore have very different worldviews, whereas it might be harder to find different points of view in a group containing one or few demographics. Yes, you should definitely value intellectual diversity above racial diversity, but you could also get intellectual diversity more easily _through_ racial diversity. > > Again, this is all just logistics and technicalities; I'm not really trying to argue or anything. I just thought I'd throw this out there. Racial diversity should be considered is when your target audience consists of a substantial amount of other races. In that scenario you need input from "representatives" of other races so you don't create a product that doesn't appeal to them. Take Riot for example. Gameplay>Lore. In gameplay, you need intellectual diversity because that's how you achieve balance. In Lore, you don't necessarily need race diversity because tbh Runeterra isn't even on earth and there are different cultures that don't translate into the ones on earth.
SEKAI (OCE)
: The League community is having its worst worst knee-jerk ever, it would seem. ..... Also, what's wrong with a Shuriman doctor, or that a doctor somehow only makes 100% more sense to be from Zaun? You don't suppose Shurima had something like doctors in the height of their empire and after?
> [{quoted}](name=SEKAI,realm=OCE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=goNRhuyl,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2018-08-31T22:21:08.327+0000) > > The League community is having its worst worst knee-jerk ever, it would seem. > > ..... > > Also, what's wrong with a Shuriman doctor, or that a doctor somehow only makes 100% more sense to be from Zaun? You don't suppose Shurima had something like doctors in the height of their empire and after? Did you read the Shurima lore at all? Pretty sure apart from Nasus, Azir and Renek, Xerath killed the rest.
CLG ear (NA)
: is it good
> [{quoted}](name=CLG ear,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=zaZQiA9r,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2018-08-31T14:32:57.854+0000) > > is it good Really good
Exibir mais

Anin777

Nível 30 (EUW)
Total de votos positivos
Criar uma discussão